← New search

2007 Cadillac Srx

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2007 Cadillac Srx do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 192.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Srx years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

42 reports with mileage · 10 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Power Train. Review the 12 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 7 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Visibility. Review the 7 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

3 crash reports1 fire reports3 injury reports

Wheels complaints

1 reports
Clear category filter
3,500 miles · Sep 30, 2007
Wheels

VEHICLE: 2007 CADILLAC SRX BUILD DATE APPROXIMATELY APRIL 2007 PROBLEM: WHEEL LUG NUTS NOT STAYING TIGHT. HISTORY: ALL 24 LUG NUTS FOUND LOOSE OR FINGER TIGHT (ABLE TO BE REMOVED BY HAND WITH SOCKET BUT WITHOUT USING WRENCH) AT 3,500 MILES. TIGHTENED BY OWNER USING OWNER'S CALIBRATED/CERTIFIED TORQUE WRENCH AND RETURNED …

Read full complaint

VEHICLE: 2007 CADILLAC SRX BUILD DATE APPROXIMATELY APRIL 2007 PROBLEM: WHEEL LUG NUTS NOT STAYING TIGHT. HISTORY: ALL 24 LUG NUTS FOUND LOOSE OR FINGER TIGHT (ABLE TO BE REMOVED BY HAND WITH SOCKET BUT WITHOUT USING WRENCH) AT 3,500 MILES. TIGHTENED BY OWNER USING OWNER'S CALIBRATED/CERTIFIED TORQUE WRENCH AND RETURNED VEHICLE TO DEALER FOR INSPECTION. DEALER FOUND ALL LUG NUTS TIGHT. DEALER RETURNED CAR TO OWNER. NUTS RE-CHECKED AND FOUND LOOSE ON 3 WHEELS. RETURNED TO DEALER TO INSPECT AND TIGHTEN. DEALER FOUND ALL LUG NUTS TIGHT BUT BROKE ONE (1) WHEEL STUD OFF TIGHTENING LOOSE STUD BEFORE REACHING SPECIFIED TORQUE. DEALER RE-CHECKED THE PREVIOUSLY VERIFIED NUTS AND FOUND 3 NUTS ON ONE WHEEL AT LESS THAN THE PROPER TORQUE. NO SIGN OF WHEEL DAMAGE FOUND. ALL NUTS AND STUDS THREADED SMOOTHLY AND DID NOT APPEAR DAMAGED. NO EVIDENCE PAINT ACTED AS A SHIM THUS PREVENTING STUDS FROM ACHIEVING NECESSARY CLAMPING FORCE. CONCLUSION: DETERMINED PROBLEM IS NOT THAT THE WHEEL NUTS WERE LOOSE, BUT THAT THEY WOULDN'T STAY TIGHT. POSSIBLE CAUSE(S): DEFECTIVE STUDS WITH IMPROPER STEEL HARDENING OR MATERIAL. HYDROGEN EMBRITTLEMENT OF THE HARDENED ELECTROPLATED STUDS. OVERTIGHTENED STUDS WHICH STRETCHED BEYOND ELASTIC LIMIT. REASON OR TIME OF POSSIBLE OVER-TIGHTENING UNKNOWN; DEALERS RECORDS DO NOT SHOW WHEELS HAVE BEEN OFF THE VEHICLE. DRIVING THE VEHICLE WITH LOOSE NUTS FROM TIME OF ASSEMBLY (NOT LIKELY IN MODERN ASSEMBLY LINE METHODS) OR LOOSENED NUTS (CAUSE UNKNOWN) WHICH SEQUENTIALLY STRETCHED EACH UNTIL FATIGUED. NO EVIDENCE THIS COULD HAVE OCCURRED WITHOUT DEFORMING HOLES IN WHEEL. REMEDY: DEALER REMOVED AND INSPECTED WHEEL AND AXLE FLANGE AND REPLACED ALL WHEEL STUDS AND NUTS. RESULT: NEW STUDS ARE PERFORMING SATISFACTORY AND HOLDING PROPER TORQUE. NOT KNOWN IF OLD PARTS WERE KEPT. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10204503

Official recalls

1

07V589000 · Power Train:axle Assembly:axle Shaft:seal

Dec 20, 2007

ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES, THE REAR AXLE PINION SEAL DOES NOT MEET ALL OF THE SPECIFICATIONS AND MAY EXPERIENCE A FLUID LEAK.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A REAR DIFFERENTIAL FAILURE MAY CAUSE LOSS OF MOTIVE POWER AND POSSIBLY LOSS OF CONTROL INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE PINION SEAL FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON FEBRUARY 1, 2008. OWNERS MAY CONTACT CADILLAC AT 1-800-458-8006 OR HTTP://WWW.CADILLAC.COM; PONTIAC AT 1-800-620-7668 OR HTTP://WWW.PONTIAC.COM; AND SATURN AT 1-800-972-8876 OR HTTP://WWW.SATURN.COM.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE07037 · Failure Of The Rear Differential

Opened Jul 17, 2007 · Closed Dec 27, 2007

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Power Train:driveline:differential Unit

ODI EVALUATED TWO DIFFERENT ALLEGED DEFECTS INVOLVING REAR DRIVETRAIN COMPONENTS DURING THIS PRELIMINARY EVALUATION.GM IS CONDUCTING A RECALL TO ADDRESS ONE OF THE DEFECT CONDITIONS AND ODI HAS OPENED AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO CONTINUE ITS INVESTIGATION OF THE OTHER ALLEGED DEFECT. ON DECEMBER 19, 2007, GM SUBMITTED A DEFECT INFORMATION REPORT TO NHTSA CONCERNING DEFECTIVE REAR AXLE PINION SEALS IN APPROXIMATELY 275,936 MODEL YEAR (MY) 2005-07 CADILLAC CTS, STS AND SRX VEHICLES AS WELL AS MY 2006-07 PONTIAC SOLSTICE AND MY 2007 SATURN SKY VEHICLES (RECALL 07V-589).ON STS AND SRX VEHICLES WITH ALL WHEEL DRIVE, THE FRONT AXLE PINION SEAL ALSO DOES NOT MEET ALL OF GM'S SPECIFICATIONS AND MAY EXPERIENCE A FLUID LEAK.GM INDICATED THAT THE SEAL SUPPLIER MADE AN UNAUTHORIZED CHANGE TO THE PINION SEAL MATERIAL.LEAKING PINION SEALS COULD RESULT IN LOSS OF REAR DIFFERENTIAL LUBRICATION WHICH COULD RESULT IN REAR WHEEL LOCK-UP AND LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL. ON DECEMBER 7, 2007, ODI OPENED AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS (EA07-017) TO INVESTIGATE COMPLAINTS OF REAR DRIVETRAIN COMPONENT FAILURE (E.G., FRACTURED REAR DIFFERENTIAL CARRIER HOUSING OR REAR AXLE HALF SHAFTS) WHILE DRIVING IN APPROXIMATELY 7,600 MY 2004 THROUGH 2006 CADILLAC CTS-V VEHICLES.THIS CONDITION MAY RESULT IN A LOSS OF MOTIVE POWER AND VEHICLE DISABLEMENT AND IS NOT ADDRESSED BY RECALL 07V-589.ODI IDENTIFIED 35 COMPLAINTS (16 TO ODI AND 19 TO GM) AND 128 WARRANTY CLAIMS POTENTIALLY RELATED TO THIS CONDITION (SEE EA07-017 OPENING RESUME).THESE COMPLAINTS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE FAILURE REPORT SUMMARY OF THIS CLOSING RESUME. THE COMPLAINTS AND WARRANTY FIGURES GIVEN IN THIS RESUME ARE LIMITED TO THOSE THAT (A) ARE MOST LIKELY CAUSED BY A LEAKING REAR PINION SEAL; AND (B) RESULTED IN AN ALLEGATION OF A REAR DIFFERENTIAL FAILURE WHILE DRIVING.THE DATA DO NOT INCLUDE ALL REPORTS OF SEAL LEAKAGE.