← New search

1999 Pontiac Grand Am

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Grand Am years

Owner complaints for the 1999 Pontiac Grand Am are substantially higher than the model-year median of 82.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

273 reports with mileage · 576 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 203 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Engine And Engine Cooling. Review the 133 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 132 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

73 crash reports13 fire reports48 injury reports

Suspension complaints

107 reports
Clear category filter
41,000 miles · Jul 20, 2004
Suspension

VEHICLE WAS PARKED IN GARAGE, COIL SPRING ON RIGHT FRONT FRACTURED, REPLACED BOTH OF THE FRONT SPRINGS,STRUTS,TOP PLATES & DUST BOOTS. COST OF REPAIRS IN EXCESS OF $500. FRACTURED SPRING & NON FRACTURED SPRING ARE AVAILABLE. *JB

NHTSA ODI #10082324

69,000 miles · Jul 6, 2004
Suspension

WHILE PULLING OUT OF THE GARAGE THE CONSUMER HEARD A NOISE. THE CONSUMER THOUGHT IT WAS A BLOWN TIRE BUT WHEN THE CONSUMER EXAMINED THE TIRE AND CHANGED IT, HE DISCOVERED THAT THE COIL SPRING HAD BROKEN. THIS BREAKAGE DAMAGED THE TIRE AND THE FRONT RIGHT STRUT. THE CONSUMER CALLED THE MANUFACTURER, BUT WAS TOLD BY THE MANUFA…

Read full complaint

WHILE PULLING OUT OF THE GARAGE THE CONSUMER HEARD A NOISE. THE CONSUMER THOUGHT IT WAS A BLOWN TIRE BUT WHEN THE CONSUMER EXAMINED THE TIRE AND CHANGED IT, HE DISCOVERED THAT THE COIL SPRING HAD BROKEN. THIS BREAKAGE DAMAGED THE TIRE AND THE FRONT RIGHT STRUT. THE CONSUMER CALLED THE MANUFACTURER, BUT WAS TOLD BY THE MANUFACTURER THAT THEY WOULD ONLY PROVIDE 40% OF THE COST. THE CONSUMER FELT THAT THE MANUFACTURER SHOULD PAY ALL OF THE COST BECAUSE THIS WAS A DEFECT. *AK *SC *JB

NHTSA ODI #10075582

69,334 miles · Jul 6, 2004
Suspension

WHILE PULLING OUT OF THE DRIVEWAY CONSUMER HEARD THE TIRE EXPLODE. CONSUMER PUT THE VEHICLE BACK IN THE DRIVEWAY TO REPAIR THE TIRE, AND DISCOVERED THAT THE RIGHT FRONT SPRING BROKE IN HALF. MANUFACTURER WAS CONSULTED ABOUT THE PROBLEM AND OFFERED A FORTY PERCENT DISCOUNT. *AK THE FAULTY COIL SPRING ALSO DAMAGED THE VEHICL…

Read full complaint

WHILE PULLING OUT OF THE DRIVEWAY CONSUMER HEARD THE TIRE EXPLODE. CONSUMER PUT THE VEHICLE BACK IN THE DRIVEWAY TO REPAIR THE TIRE, AND DISCOVERED THAT THE RIGHT FRONT SPRING BROKE IN HALF. MANUFACTURER WAS CONSULTED ABOUT THE PROBLEM AND OFFERED A FORTY PERCENT DISCOUNT. *AK THE FAULTY COIL SPRING ALSO DAMAGED THE VEHICLE'S STRUT WHEN IT BROKE. THE CONSUMER BELIEVES THEY SHOULD PAY FOR ALL THE REPAIR COST. *NM

NHTSA ODI #10075549

60,461 miles · Jun 14, 2004
Suspension

LEFT FRONT COIL SPRING BROKEN ON 1999 PONTIAC GRAND AM. *MR *SC *JB

NHTSA ODI #10079333

64,000 miles · Jun 4, 2004
Suspension

WHILE DRIVING, THE DRIVER SIDE FRONT COIL SPRING BROKE WHICH CAUSED A LOUD NOISE AT 45-50 MPH, DRIVING. *JB THE CONSUMER HEARD RUBBING NOISES AFTER SEVERAL TURNS. THE CONSUMER FOUND A BROKEN SPRING RESTING ON THE TIRE. *SC *JB

NHTSA ODI #10065490

Mileage unknown · May 21, 2004
Suspension

WHILE BACKING OUT OF A PARKING SPACE A LOUD SNAP OCCURRED FROM THE RIGHT PASSENGER SIDE. A COIL SPRING SNAPPED INTO TWO PIECES AND CAUSED THE CAR TO IMMEDIATELY DROP DOWN ON TOP OF THE RIGHT FRONT TIRE. THIS LED TO PUNCTURING OF THE TIRE. THE CAR HAD TO BE TOWED TO A GARAGE AND IT IS CURRENTLY BEING SERVICED. AFTER LOOKING O…

Read full complaint

WHILE BACKING OUT OF A PARKING SPACE A LOUD SNAP OCCURRED FROM THE RIGHT PASSENGER SIDE. A COIL SPRING SNAPPED INTO TWO PIECES AND CAUSED THE CAR TO IMMEDIATELY DROP DOWN ON TOP OF THE RIGHT FRONT TIRE. THIS LED TO PUNCTURING OF THE TIRE. THE CAR HAD TO BE TOWED TO A GARAGE AND IT IS CURRENTLY BEING SERVICED. AFTER LOOKING ON THIS WEBSITE I SAW AT LEAST 15 CASES LIKE MINE. THIS COULD'VE LED TO A SERIOUS INJURY IF I WERE TRAVELING AT A HIGHER SPEED. PLEASE LOOK INTO THIS SITUATION.*AK

NHTSA ODI #10072932

Mileage unknown · May 18, 2004
Suspension

WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED THE DRIVER NOTICED THAT THE FRONT DRIVER SIDE TIRED WAS DEFLATED. THE DRIVER INSPECTED THE TIRE AND NOTICED THAT COIL SPRING WAS BROKEN. PLEASE PROVIDE FURTHER DETAILS. *JB

NHTSA ODI #10073811

87,249 miles · May 17, 2004
Suspension

WHILE DRIVING ON THE INTERSTATE , THE FRONT RIGHT TIRE BLOW . WHICH CAUSED THE FRONT RIGHT SPRING TO BREAK OFF . LUCKLY , THE VEHICLE DID NOT FLIP OVER ON THE INTERSTATE . HAD TO GET THE CAR TOWED BECAUSE THE FRONT OF THE VEHICLE WAS LYING ON THE GROUND BECAUSED OF THE SPRING BRAKING OFF . HAD TO REPLACED "NEW ", RIGHT SPRING …

Read full complaint

WHILE DRIVING ON THE INTERSTATE , THE FRONT RIGHT TIRE BLOW . WHICH CAUSED THE FRONT RIGHT SPRING TO BREAK OFF . LUCKLY , THE VEHICLE DID NOT FLIP OVER ON THE INTERSTATE . HAD TO GET THE CAR TOWED BECAUSE THE FRONT OF THE VEHICLE WAS LYING ON THE GROUND BECAUSED OF THE SPRING BRAKING OFF . HAD TO REPLACED "NEW ", RIGHT SPRING , RIGHT STRUT AND A NEW RIGHT TIRE FOR THE VEHIVLE . NOW HAVE TO REPLACE LEFT STRUT AND SPRING DUE TO CAR NOT LEVEL . 1999 GRAND AM SE. *AK

NHTSA ODI #10072782

55,298 miles · May 10, 2004
Suspension

1. DROVE 1999 PONTIAC GRAND AM WITH 55,000 MILES ABOUT 600 MILES AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS OVER 3 DAYS, THEN PARKED CAR OVERNIGHT. 2. PULLED OUT OF DRIVEWAY AT SLOW SPEED NEXT MORNING. RUBBING NOISE AND SOME RESISTANCE FROM RIGHT FRONT (PASSENGER) SIDE WHEEL. STOPPED CAR AFTER 50 FEET. THOUGHT IT WAS WET BRAKES. STOPPED CAR AND START…

Read full complaint

1. DROVE 1999 PONTIAC GRAND AM WITH 55,000 MILES ABOUT 600 MILES AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS OVER 3 DAYS, THEN PARKED CAR OVERNIGHT. 2. PULLED OUT OF DRIVEWAY AT SLOW SPEED NEXT MORNING. RUBBING NOISE AND SOME RESISTANCE FROM RIGHT FRONT (PASSENGER) SIDE WHEEL. STOPPED CAR AFTER 50 FEET. THOUGHT IT WAS WET BRAKES. STOPPED CAR AND STARTED UP AGAIN AND SAME RUBBING NOISE. BACKED CAR SLOWLY BACK INTO DRIVEWAY. SHUT OFF CAR. HEARD LOUD METAL SNAP NOISE FROM RIGHT FRONT (PASSENGER) SIDE WHEEL. CAR THEN DROPPED DOWN WITH NO SPACE BETWEEN TOP OF TIRE AND SUSPENSION. 3. CALLED LOCAL GARAGE AND HAD CAR TOWED. REPLACED RIGHT FRONT (PASSENGER) WHEEL SPRING. CHECKED, ADJUSTED AND DID FULL ALIGNMENT ON CAR. WOULD HAVE REPLACED BOTH SPRINGS BUT PARTS ON NATIONAL BACKORDER. 4. TIRE PUNCTURE AND MAJOR ACCIDENT OR DEATH COULD HAVE OCCURRED IF THIS HAD HAPPENED ONLY A FEW HOURS EARLIER WHILE DRIVING AT 65 MPH! *LA

NHTSA ODI #10072376

89,993 miles · May 8, 2004
Suspension

FORTUNATELY, I WAS BACKING OUT OF GARAGE AND TURNING STEERING WHEEL WHEN THE FRONT LEFT COIL SPRING SNAPPED AND DUG INTO THE BACK OF MY FRONT LEFT TIRE. I ONLY WONDER WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF THE HAD BEEN ON THE HIGHWAY AT A HIGH RATE OF SPEED WITH SURRONDING TRAFFIC. COIL SPRINGS WERE REPLACED ALONG WITH A NEW TIRE FOR W…

Read full complaint

FORTUNATELY, I WAS BACKING OUT OF GARAGE AND TURNING STEERING WHEEL WHEN THE FRONT LEFT COIL SPRING SNAPPED AND DUG INTO THE BACK OF MY FRONT LEFT TIRE. I ONLY WONDER WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF THE HAD BEEN ON THE HIGHWAY AT A HIGH RATE OF SPEED WITH SURRONDING TRAFFIC. COIL SPRINGS WERE REPLACED ALONG WITH A NEW TIRE FOR WRECKED ONE THAT ONLY HAD 8000 MILES ON IT. TOTAL COST $545.26.*AK

NHTSA ODI #10068497

Official recalls

3

14V400000 · Electrical System:ignition

Jul 3, 2014

This defect can affect the safe operation of the airbag system. Until this recall is performed, customers should remove all items from their key rings, leaving only the ignition key. The key fob (if applicable), should also be removed from the key ring. General Motors LLC (GM) notified the agency on July 3, 2014, that they are recalling 5,877,718 model year 2000-2005 Chevrolet Impala and Monte Carlo, 1997-2003 Chevrolet Malibu, 2004-2005 Malibu Classic, 1999-2004 Oldsmobile Alero, 1998-2002 Oldsmobile Intrigue, 1999-2005 Pontiac Grand Am and 2004-2008 Pontiac Grand Prix vehicles. In these models, the weight on the key ring and/or road conditions or some other jarring event may cause the ignition switch to move out of the run position, turning off the engine.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the key is not in the run position, the air bags may not deploy if the vehicle is involved in a crash, increasing the risk of injury.

Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will install two key rings and an insert in the key slot or a cover over the key head on all ignition keys, free of charge. The recall began on September 9, 2014. GM's number for this recall is 14350.

00V140000 · Structure:body

May 18, 2000

VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: THESE VEHICLES DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE OCCUPANT PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS OF FMVSS NO. 201, "OCCUPANT PROTECTION IN INTERIOR IMPACT." THE CONSOLE COVER ON THESE VEHICLES DOES NOT STAY CLOSED WHEN A SPECIFIED VERTICAL LOAD IS APPLIED.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH, THE CONSOLE COVER COULD OPEN AND THE COVER OR ITEMS STORED UNDER IT COULD INJURE AN OCCUPANT.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE CONSOLE LATCH MECHANISM.

98V320000 · Steering: Steering Wheel/handle Bar

Dec 15, 1998

VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE STEERING WHEEL CAN COME LOOSE FROM THE STEERING SHAFT BECAUSE THE STEERING WHEEL RETAINING NUT COULD HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY TIGHTENED.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: THIS CONDITION COULD CAUSE A LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE STEERING WHEEL RETAINING NUT FOR CORRECT TIGHTNESS AND TIGHTEN IF NECESSARY.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

3

RQ04005 · Turn Signal Failures

Opened Jun 18, 2004 · Closed Nov 30, 2004

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Exterior Lighting:hazard Flashing Warning Lights:switch; Exterior Lighting:turn Signal:switch

GM CONDUCTED A RECALL (NHTSA RECALL NUMBER 03V327) ON MODEL YEAR (MY) 2000-2001 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES TO REPLACE DEFECTIVE HAZARD SWITCHES THAT CAUSE THE TURN SIGNALS AND HAZARD LIGHTS TO FAIL.THE RECALL COVERED VEHICLES BUILT FROM FEBRUARY 2000 THROUGH MAY 2001 (DEPENDING ON MODEL).ODI OPENED THIS INVESTIGATION BASED ON 64 REPORTS ALLEGING TURN SIGNAL FAILURE ON MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER THE RECALL AND BUILT PRIOR TO FEBRUARY 2000.IN DECEMBER 2004, GM WILL ISSUE A SPECIAL POLICY FOR MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER RECALL 03V327.THE POLICY COVERS TURN SIGNAL/HAZARD FLASHER FAILURE FOR A PERIOD OF 10 YEARS OR 150,000 MILES (WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST) TO PROVIDE A NO COST REPLACEMENT OF THE HAZARD SWITCH.GM WILL SEND LETTERS TO OWNERS STARTING DECEMBER 30, 2004.THE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE MANUFACTURER IS SUFFICIENT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUES RAISED BY THIS INVESTIGATION.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE FUTURE ACTION IF WARRANTED BY THE CIRCUMSTANCES.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Exterior Lighting:hazard Flashing Warning Lights:switch

GM CONDUCTED A RECALL (NHTSA RECALL NUMBER 03V327) ON MODEL YEAR (MY) 2000-2001 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES TO REPLACE DEFECTIVE HAZARD SWITCHES THAT CAUSE THE TURN SIGNALS AND HAZARD LIGHTS TO FAIL.THE RECALL COVERED VEHICLES BUILT FROM FEBRUARY 2000 THROUGH MAY 2001 (DEPENDING ON MODEL).ODI OPENED THIS INVESTIGATION BASED ON 64 REPORTS ALLEGING TURN SIGNAL FAILURE ON MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER THE RECALL AND BUILT PRIOR TO FEBRUARY 2000.IN DECEMBER 2004, GM WILL ISSUE A SPECIAL POLICY FOR MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER RECALL 03V327.THE POLICY COVERS TURN SIGNAL/HAZARD FLASHER FAILURE FOR A PERIOD OF 10 YEARS OR 150,000 MILES (WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST) TO PROVIDE A NO COST REPLACEMENT OF THE HAZARD SWITCH.GM WILL SEND LETTERS TO OWNERS STARTING DECEMBER 30, 2004.THE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE MANUFACTURER IS SUFFICIENT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUES RAISED BY THIS INVESTIGATION.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE FUTURE ACTION IF WARRANTED BY THE CIRCUMSTANCES.

Exterior Lighting:turn Signal:switch

GM CONDUCTED A RECALL (NHTSA RECALL NUMBER 03V327) ON MODEL YEAR (MY) 2000-2001 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES TO REPLACE DEFECTIVE HAZARD SWITCHES THAT CAUSE THE TURN SIGNALS AND HAZARD LIGHTS TO FAIL.THE RECALL COVERED VEHICLES BUILT FROM FEBRUARY 2000 THROUGH MAY 2001 (DEPENDING ON MODEL).ODI OPENED THIS INVESTIGATION BASED ON 64 REPORTS ALLEGING TURN SIGNAL FAILURE ON MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER THE RECALL AND BUILT PRIOR TO FEBRUARY 2000.IN DECEMBER 2004, GM WILL ISSUE A SPECIAL POLICY FOR MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER RECALL 03V327.THE POLICY COVERS TURN SIGNAL/HAZARD FLASHER FAILURE FOR A PERIOD OF 10 YEARS OR 150,000 MILES (WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST) TO PROVIDE A NO COST REPLACEMENT OF THE HAZARD SWITCH.GM WILL SEND LETTERS TO OWNERS STARTING DECEMBER 30, 2004.THE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE MANUFACTURER IS SUFFICIENT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUES RAISED BY THIS INVESTIGATION.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE FUTURE ACTION IF WARRANTED BY THE CIRCUMSTANCES.

EA03021 · Front Suspension Coil Spring Fracture

Opened Nov 4, 2003 · Closed Oct 19, 2004

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Suspension; Suspension:front; Suspension:front:springs:coil Springs

THE FAILURE RATE OF THE SUBJECT VEHICLES IS LOW RELATIVE TO PAST ODI INVESTIGATIONS.THE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS IS THEREFORE CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR COMPLAINTS AND OTHER INFORMATION RELATING TO THE ALLEGED DEFECT IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES AND TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN THE FUTURE IF WARRANTED.PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.

Additional source detail variants (3)

Suspension:front

THE FAILURE RATE OF THE SUBJECT VEHICLES IS LOW RELATIVE TO PAST ODI INVESTIGATIONS.THE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS IS THEREFORE CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR COMPLAINTS AND OTHER INFORMATION RELATING TO THE ALLEGED DEFECT IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES AND TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN THE FUTURE IF WARRANTED.PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.

Suspension:front:springs:coil Springs

THE FAILURE RATE OF THE SUBJECT VEHICLES IS LOW RELATIVE TO PAST ODI INVESTIGATIONS.THE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS IS THEREFORE CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR COMPLAINTS AND OTHER INFORMATION RELATING TO THE ALLEGED DEFECT IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES AND TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN THE FUTURE IF WARRANTED.PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.

Suspension

THE FAILURE RATE OF THE SUBJECT VEHICLES IS LOW RELATIVE TO PAST ODI INVESTIGATIONS.THE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS IS THEREFORE CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR COMPLAINTS AND OTHER INFORMATION RELATING TO THE ALLEGED DEFECT IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES AND TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN THE FUTURE IF WARRANTED.PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.

PE03031 · Front Suspension Coil Spring Fracture

Opened Jul 14, 2003 · Closed Nov 4, 2003

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Suspension:front; Suspension:front:springs:coil Springs

THE SUBJECT VEHICLES ARE EQUIPPED WITH A COIL SPRING-OVER-STRUT FRONT SUSPENSION WITH THE SPRING ITSELF RESTING IN COMPRESSION BETWEEN TWO POLYMER ISOLATORS.PE03-031 WAS OPENED TO INVESTIGATE REPORTS OF FRACTURE OF THIS SPRING.THE FRACTURES OCCUR IN THE FIRST ACTIVE COIL ABOVE THE LOWER ISOLATOR AND APPARENTLY ORIGINATE IN CORROSION PITS FOUND BENEATH REGIONS OF DAMAGED EPOXY COATING.CONSUMER COMPLAINTS AND WARRANTY DATA SHOW THAT THE FAILURES OCCUR PREDOMINANTLY IN THE ?CORROSION STATES? AND TEND TO APPEAR OUTSIDE OF THE STANDARD 36,000 MILE WARRANTY TERM.THESE DATA ALSO SUGGEST THAT THESE FAILURES WILL CONTINUE TO HAPPEN.SLIGHTLY MORE THAN ONE THIRD OF THE CONSUMER COMPLAINTS HAVE INVOLVED THE BROKEN SPRING COIL CONTACTING THE ADJACENT TIRE.ODI IS UPGRADING PE03-031 TO AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO GATHER FURTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SCOPE AND CONSEQUENCES OF THESE FAILURES.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Suspension:front

THE SUBJECT VEHICLES ARE EQUIPPED WITH A COIL SPRING-OVER-STRUT FRONT SUSPENSION WITH THE SPRING ITSELF RESTING IN COMPRESSION BETWEEN TWO POLYMER ISOLATORS.PE03-031 WAS OPENED TO INVESTIGATE REPORTS OF FRACTURE OF THIS SPRING.THE FRACTURES OCCUR IN THE FIRST ACTIVE COIL ABOVE THE LOWER ISOLATOR AND APPARENTLY ORIGINATE IN CORROSION PITS FOUND BENEATH REGIONS OF DAMAGED EPOXY COATING.CONSUMER COMPLAINTS AND WARRANTY DATA SHOW THAT THE FAILURES OCCUR PREDOMINANTLY IN THE ?CORROSION STATES? AND TEND TO APPEAR OUTSIDE OF THE STANDARD 36,000 MILE WARRANTY TERM.THESE DATA ALSO SUGGEST THAT THESE FAILURES WILL CONTINUE TO HAPPEN.SLIGHTLY MORE THAN ONE THIRD OF THE CONSUMER COMPLAINTS HAVE INVOLVED THE BROKEN SPRING COIL CONTACTING THE ADJACENT TIRE.ODI IS UPGRADING PE03-031 TO AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO GATHER FURTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SCOPE AND CONSEQUENCES OF THESE FAILURES.

Suspension:front:springs:coil Springs

THE SUBJECT VEHICLES ARE EQUIPPED WITH A COIL SPRING-OVER-STRUT FRONT SUSPENSION WITH THE SPRING ITSELF RESTING IN COMPRESSION BETWEEN TWO POLYMER ISOLATORS.PE03-031 WAS OPENED TO INVESTIGATE REPORTS OF FRACTURE OF THIS SPRING.THE FRACTURES OCCUR IN THE FIRST ACTIVE COIL ABOVE THE LOWER ISOLATOR AND APPARENTLY ORIGINATE IN CORROSION PITS FOUND BENEATH REGIONS OF DAMAGED EPOXY COATING.CONSUMER COMPLAINTS AND WARRANTY DATA SHOW THAT THE FAILURES OCCUR PREDOMINANTLY IN THE ?CORROSION STATES? AND TEND TO APPEAR OUTSIDE OF THE STANDARD 36,000 MILE WARRANTY TERM.THESE DATA ALSO SUGGEST THAT THESE FAILURES WILL CONTINUE TO HAPPEN.SLIGHTLY MORE THAN ONE THIRD OF THE CONSUMER COMPLAINTS HAVE INVOLVED THE BROKEN SPRING COIL CONTACTING THE ADJACENT TIRE.ODI IS UPGRADING PE03-031 TO AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO GATHER FURTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SCOPE AND CONSEQUENCES OF THESE FAILURES.