Air BagsService BrakesVehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury
TL* THE CONTACT OWNED A 2006 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. WHILE DRIVING AT AN UNKNOWN SPEED WITH THE CRUISE CONTROL ACTIVATED, THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED. THE REAR BRAKES LOCKED WHEN THE FAILURE OCCURRED. THE CONTACT WAS UNABLE TO STOP THE VEHICLE AND CRASHED INTO A TREE. THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. THE FRONT SEAT PASSENGER W…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNED A 2006 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. WHILE DRIVING AT AN UNKNOWN SPEED WITH THE CRUISE CONTROL ACTIVATED, THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED. THE REAR BRAKES LOCKED WHEN THE FAILURE OCCURRED. THE CONTACT WAS UNABLE TO STOP THE VEHICLE AND CRASHED INTO A TREE. THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. THE FRONT SEAT PASSENGER WAS INJURED AND RECEIVED MEDICAL ATTENTION. THE VEHICLE WAS DESTROYED. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 38,000.
NHTSA ODI #10706270
Mileage unknown · Feb 23, 2015
Air BagsSteering
2006 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO RECALL REPAIR ISSUES. *SMD THE CONSUMER STATED THE AIR BAG LIGHT ILLUMINATED AND THERE WAS A DINGING SOUND COMING FROM THE VEHICLE. *JB
NHTSA ODI #10667998
Mileage unknown · Jan 28, 2015
Air BagsSeat Belts
2006 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE AIR BAG LIGHT ILLUMINATED. *TA THE DEALER REPLACED THE SEAT BELT TENSIONER. *JB
NHTSA ODI #10659574
24,391 miles · Nov 25, 2014
Air BagsSeat Belts
FIRST NOTICED AIRBAG LIGHT BEGAN FLASHING ON AND OFF. WITHIN TWO DAYS THE AIRBAG LIGHT CAME ON AND REMAINED ON. HAD THE DEALER CHECK THIS OUT. THE REPORT CAME BACK DRIVER SIDE SEAT BELT WAS AT FAULT. NO REPAIR AVAILABLE MUST BE REPLACED. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10660950
62,418 miles · Nov 20, 2014
Air Bags
LIGHT FOR AIR BAG CAME ON WITH WARNING SOUND. HAD LOCAL GARAGE FIX WITH NEW PARTS FROM FORD DEALER. THIS MORNING UPON BACKING OUT OF GARAGE AT APPROXIMATELY 70,000. MILES SAME PROBLEM OF LIGHT AND SOUND. SUPPOSED TO TAKE IT TO SAME GARAGE TO DIAGNOSE TOMORROW. IT COST ME, A 78 YR. WIDOW, $561.72 TO REPLACE THIS IN AUG. OF 2013. …
Read full complaint
LIGHT FOR AIR BAG CAME ON WITH WARNING SOUND. HAD LOCAL GARAGE FIX WITH NEW PARTS FROM FORD DEALER. THIS MORNING UPON BACKING OUT OF GARAGE AT APPROXIMATELY 70,000. MILES SAME PROBLEM OF LIGHT AND SOUND. SUPPOSED TO TAKE IT TO SAME GARAGE TO DIAGNOSE TOMORROW. IT COST ME, A 78 YR. WIDOW, $561.72 TO REPLACE THIS IN AUG. OF 2013. I AM NOT GOING TO SPEND ANOTHER CENT ON THIS PROBLEM. WHAT IN THE WORLD HAS HAPPENED TO AIR BAG INSTALLATION? *TR
NHTSA ODI #10659853
100,000 miles · Nov 3, 2014
Air BagsSeat Belts
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2006 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE AIR BAG WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC, WHO DIAGNOSED THAT THE SEAT BELT TENSION NEEDED TO BE REPLACED HOWEVER, THE PART TO DO THE REPAIR WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS …
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2006 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE AIR BAG WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC, WHO DIAGNOSED THAT THE SEAT BELT TENSION NEEDED TO BE REPLACED HOWEVER, THE PART TO DO THE REPAIR WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 100,000.
NHTSA ODI #10652234
72,800 miles · Sep 15, 2014
Air Bags
AIR BAG LIGHT ON THE DASH COMES ON AND STAY ON WHILE DRIVING. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10633404
107,242 miles · Jul 18, 2014
Air BagsSeat Belts
STARTED CAR TO GO TO WORK IDLING IN DRIVE WAY AND I GOT AN AIR BAG LIGHT AND ALARM GOING OFF, TURNED CAR OFF AND RESTARTED AND SAME THING. WAS SCARED TO DRIVE UNTIL I TALKED TO MECHANIC AT LOCAL DEALERSHIP. HE SAID THE PROBLEM IS IN THE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY AND WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED.PARTS ABOUT 260 DOLLARS PLUS LABOR PROBABLY …
Read full complaint
STARTED CAR TO GO TO WORK IDLING IN DRIVE WAY AND I GOT AN AIR BAG LIGHT AND ALARM GOING OFF, TURNED CAR OFF AND RESTARTED AND SAME THING. WAS SCARED TO DRIVE UNTIL I TALKED TO MECHANIC AT LOCAL DEALERSHIP. HE SAID THE PROBLEM IS IN THE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY AND WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED.PARTS ABOUT 260 DOLLARS PLUS LABOR PROBABLY ANOTHER 200 DOLLARS. RESEARCHING AIR BAG LIGHT ISSUES FOR GRAND MARQUIS FOR FIXES FOR MY PROBLEM I DISCOVERED THERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER OWNERS OF SAME MODEL WITH SAME ISSUE. WAS WONDERING IF OTHERS HAS REPORTED AND IF SO WHY HAS THERE NOT BEEN A RECALL. I LOVE MY CAR OTHERWISE AND POOR SINGLE FATHER RAISING MY CHILDREN ON MY OWN AND CANNOT AFFORD THESE REPAIRS PLUS DRIVING A CAR THAT THE AIR BAGS POSSIBLE WONT WORK ON LORD FORBID WE WERE IN AN ACCIDENT. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10614585
96,000 miles · Jul 7, 2014
Air BagsEngineFire
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2006 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE AIR BAG WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED. IN ADDITION, A BURNING ODOR EMITTED INSIDE OF THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE OCCURRED WHENEVER THE VEHICLE WAS IN OPERATION. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE …
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2006 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE AIR BAG WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED. IN ADDITION, A BURNING ODOR EMITTED INSIDE OF THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE OCCURRED WHENEVER THE VEHICLE WAS IN OPERATION. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 96,000. MA 09/03/15 THE CONSUMER STATED THE CRUISE CONTROL FAILED TO OPERATE. UPDATED 12/9/2015 *JS
NHTSA ODI #10608577
60,177 miles · Jul 3, 2014
Air BagsSeat Belts
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2006 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE AIR BAG WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED CONTINUOUSLY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING WHERE THE TECHNICIAN CONFIRMED THAT THE FAILURE WAS CONTRIBUTED TO THE FAULTY FRONT DRIVER AND PASSENGER SIDE SEAT BELT PRETENSIONER. THE VEHI…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2006 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE AIR BAG WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED CONTINUOUSLY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING WHERE THE TECHNICIAN CONFIRMED THAT THE FAILURE WAS CONTRIBUTED TO THE FAULTY FRONT DRIVER AND PASSENGER SIDE SEAT BELT PRETENSIONER. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 60,177. UPDATED 8/28/14*CN UPDATED 09/11/2014 *JS
Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2005-2011 Ford Crown Victoria, 2005-2011 Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles manufactured March 23, 2004, to August 30, 2011, and 2005-2011 Lincoln Town Car vehicles manufactured March 8, 2004, to August 30, 2011, and on which the upper intermediate shaft was serviced during the course of safety recall 13V-385. The prior repairs may not have been correctly performed.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: Improper servicing of the upper intermediate shaft could cause the shaft to separate, which can then result in a loss of steering control, and increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Ford will notify the owners of vehicles whose repair records reflect that the upper intermediate steering shaft was repaired during the course of the prior recall 13V-385. Dealers will inspect and replace the upper immediate shaft if necessary free of charge. The recall began November 17, 2014. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 14S25.
Ford is recalling certain model year 2005-2011 Ford Crown Victoria (including Crown Victoria Police Interceptors), Mercury Grand Marquis, and Lincoln Town Car vehicles. The affected vehicles are currently registered or were originally sold in Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Severe corrosion can seize the lower intermediate shaft which may cause the upper intermediate shaft to collapse and the steering column lower bearing to separate.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: If the lower bearing separates, the vehicle may experience a loss of steering, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Ford will notify owners and dealers will replace the lower intermediate shaft, free of charge. The upper intermediate shaft and steering column lower bearing will be inspected to identify any damage that may have occurred as a result of lower intermediate shaft corrosion, and repaired or replaced as necessary. If the steering column lower bearing has separated, a retainer clip will be installed. The recall began on October 23, 2013. Owners may contact Ford at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's recall number is 13S08.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
1
PE14021 · Steering Column Shaft Obstruction
Opened Jul 7, 2014 · Closed Nov 21, 2014
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Engine And Engine Cooling:exhaust System; Steering
On July 7, 2014 the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a preliminary evaluation based on five complaints (VOQs) alleging incidents ofinterference between dislodged exhaust manifold heat shields and the lower steering shaft/knuckle, including one alleging the interference resulted in a crash on a highway entrance ramp. Since opening this investigation, ODI has received four additional owner complaints.One indicated that the shield was removed before binding could occur.The other three occurred at low speed and produced some momentary steering binding that was overcome by the driver when additional steering effort was applied.Once the shield was repaired or removed, the steering returned to normal.The single incident ODI identified as a possible crash (VOQ No. 10578715) related to this condition could not be verified and the description of the crash in the complaint was not supported by the police accident report.No additional crash allegations have been identified related to the alleged defect condition.Information provided by Ford in its September 10, 2014 response to ODI's information request letter identified 10 additional incidents resulting in a low rate of 1.6 incidents per 100,000 vehicles sold in vehicles ranging from 7 to 11 years in service.Six of these incidents were reported by a single source, a state police fleet that corrected the problems in March 2011 and has not reported any additional failures since.Ford also reported 5 warranty claims, but these incidents occurred at very low mileages and appeared to be caused by loose or missing heat shield attachment hardware rather than the corrosion condition that was the cause of the more recent incidents and the focus of this investigation.This investigation is closed. The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The Agency will continue to monitor complaints and other information relating to the alleged defect in the subject vehicles and take further action in the future if warranted.The following VOQs are associated with this investigation:10643753, 10615584, 10611362, 10610451, 10578715, 10479681, 10471833, 10317493.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Engine And Engine Cooling:exhaust System
On July 7, 2014 the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a preliminary evaluation based on five complaints (VOQs) alleging incidents ofinterference between dislodged exhaust manifold heat shields and the lower steering shaft/knuckle, including one alleging the interference resulted in a crash on a highway entrance ramp. Since opening this investigation, ODI has received four additional owner complaints.One indicated that the shield was removed before binding could occur.The other three occurred at low speed and produced some momentary steering binding that was overcome by the driver when additional steering effort was applied.Once the shield was repaired or removed, the steering returned to normal.The single incident ODI identified as a possible crash (VOQ No. 10578715) related to this condition could not be verified and the description of the crash in the complaint was not supported by the police accident report.No additional crash allegations have been identified related to the alleged defect condition.Information provided by Ford in its September 10, 2014 response to ODI's information request letter identified 10 additional incidents resulting in a low rate of 1.6 incidents per 100,000 vehicles sold in vehicles ranging from 7 to 11 years in service.Six of these incidents were reported by a single source, a state police fleet that corrected the problems in March 2011 and has not reported any additional failures since.Ford also reported 5 warranty claims, but these incidents occurred at very low mileages and appeared to be caused by loose or missing heat shield attachment hardware rather than the corrosion condition that was the cause of the more recent incidents and the focus of this investigation.This investigation is closed. The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The Agency will continue to monitor complaints and other information relating to the alleged defect in the subject vehicles and take further action in the future if warranted.The following VOQs are associated with this investigation:10643753, 10615584, 10611362, 10610451, 10578715, 10479681, 10471833, 10317493.
Steering
On July 7, 2014 the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a preliminary evaluation based on five complaints (VOQs) alleging incidents ofinterference between dislodged exhaust manifold heat shields and the lower steering shaft/knuckle, including one alleging the interference resulted in a crash on a highway entrance ramp. Since opening this investigation, ODI has received four additional owner complaints.One indicated that the shield was removed before binding could occur.The other three occurred at low speed and produced some momentary steering binding that was overcome by the driver when additional steering effort was applied.Once the shield was repaired or removed, the steering returned to normal.The single incident ODI identified as a possible crash (VOQ No. 10578715) related to this condition could not be verified and the description of the crash in the complaint was not supported by the police accident report.No additional crash allegations have been identified related to the alleged defect condition.Information provided by Ford in its September 10, 2014 response to ODI's information request letter identified 10 additional incidents resulting in a low rate of 1.6 incidents per 100,000 vehicles sold in vehicles ranging from 7 to 11 years in service.Six of these incidents were reported by a single source, a state police fleet that corrected the problems in March 2011 and has not reported any additional failures since.Ford also reported 5 warranty claims, but these incidents occurred at very low mileages and appeared to be caused by loose or missing heat shield attachment hardware rather than the corrosion condition that was the cause of the more recent incidents and the focus of this investigation.This investigation is closed. The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The Agency will continue to monitor complaints and other information relating to the alleged defect in the subject vehicles and take further action in the future if warranted.The following VOQs are associated with this investigation:10643753, 10615584, 10611362, 10610451, 10578715, 10479681, 10471833, 10317493.
2006 Mercury Grand Marquis Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year
Illustration