← New search

2010 Lexus Hs 250 Hybrid

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Hs 250 Hybrid years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

54 reports with mileage · 22 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Suspension. Review the 30 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 20 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 15 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

9 crash reports0 fire reports3 injury reports

Suspension complaints

30 reports
Clear category filter
142,000 miles · Oct 28, 2021
Suspension

The contact owns a 2010 Lexus HS250 Hybrid. The contact stated had they had recently purchased the vehicle and had minor repairs performed on the vehicle by an independent mechanic, who informed the contact that the vehicle could not be aligned due to the repair as stated in NHTSA Campaign Number: 16V596000 (Suspension). The con…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2010 Lexus HS250 Hybrid. The contact stated had they had recently purchased the vehicle and had minor repairs performed on the vehicle by an independent mechanic, who informed the contact that the vehicle could not be aligned due to the repair as stated in NHTSA Campaign Number: 16V596000 (Suspension). The contact stated that the tie rod could not be adjusted. The mechanic referred the contact to a dealer to get the vehicle repaired. The contact reached out to the manufacturer and was informed that the vehicle needed to be inspected by an authorized dealer. the vehicle was taken to the dealer to be diagnosed. The contact was informed that the wheel bearings on the rear driver’s wheel needed to be replaced. The contact was informed that the part was no longer manufactured by the vehicle manufacturer however, there was an aftermarket part to fix the vehicle. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 142,000.

NHTSA ODI #11438534

79,000 miles · Apr 26, 2018
Electronic Stability Control (esc)EngineSuspension

I PURCHASED A 2010 HS 250H LEXUS IN AUG 8, 2016. I RECENTLY FOUND OUT THAT IT HAS BEEN RECALLED 7 TIMES WITH SERIOUS UNDER THE HOOD ISSUES AND WAS TOLD THE ONLY ONE OUTSTANDING THE ONE I STUMBLED UPON DUE TO RESEARCH. THIS CAR HAS RUINED MY LIFE.IT HAS NEEDED ALL SORT OF REPAIRS SINCE I PURCHASED IT. MOST OF THE TIME IT HAS HAD …

Read full complaint

I PURCHASED A 2010 HS 250H LEXUS IN AUG 8, 2016. I RECENTLY FOUND OUT THAT IT HAS BEEN RECALLED 7 TIMES WITH SERIOUS UNDER THE HOOD ISSUES AND WAS TOLD THE ONLY ONE OUTSTANDING THE ONE I STUMBLED UPON DUE TO RESEARCH. THIS CAR HAS RUINED MY LIFE.IT HAS NEEDED ALL SORT OF REPAIRS SINCE I PURCHASED IT. MOST OF THE TIME IT HAS HAD TO JUST SIT IN THE YARD DUE TO THE FACT THAT I WAS AND STILL IS, AFRAID TO DRIVE IT.. IT STARTED JUST A FEW DAYS AFTER MY DEALER WARRANTY HAD RUN OUT. IT CUTS OFF IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD, LOSING THE ABILITY TO ACCELERATE,ETC. ONE DAY DURING WORK TRAFFIC IT CUT OFF ON ME AND TRAFFIC STAYED BACKED UP FOR MILES BEFORE I COULD CALL AND PAY FOR A TOW TRUCK. IN FACT, NOWADAYS, THAT'S BEEN THE ONLY WAY I CAN GET IT TO AND FROM THE REPAIR SHOP. NOT TO MENTION THE FACT THAT I SOCKED MUCH OF MY SAVINGS INTO THIS CAR BECAUSE I HAD JUST RECENTLY RECEIVED MY TEACHING CERTIFICATION AND EXPECTED TO BE WORKING FULL TIME AND WOULD HAVE NO PROBLEMS. I'VE RECEIVED NUMEROUS OFFERS TO APPLY FOR NUMEROUS TEACHING POSITIONS BUT HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO APPLY DUE TO THE LACK OF TRANSPORTATION. I HAVE A LOAN AND INSURANCE THAT HAD TO BE MAINTAINED. I ALSO HAVE A MORTGAGE THAT I EXPECTED TO BE ABLE TO PAY FOR DUE TO MY NEWLY ACQUIRED CERTIFICATION AND OBTAINING A DEPENDABLE FORM OF TRANSPORTATION BECAME A NECCESITY. AT THIS POINT I HAVE HAD TO MOVE IN WITH RELATIVES BECAUSE I CAN NO LONGER AFFORD THE HOUSE AND DUE TO CONTINUOUS CAR REPAIR COST, MAY EVEN BE LOSING THE NON OPERATING 2010 LEXUS HS250H, THAT I HAVE BASICALLY NEVER BEEN ABLE UTILIZE FOR A BETTER LIFE FOR MYSELF. THE LEXUS DEALER WHO NOW HAS THE CAR HAS GIVEN ME A LOANER. I THINK THAT DRIVING THE CAR FOR EIGHT YEARS WITH THIS LAST TWO RECALLS, HAS DESTROYED IT.LIES HAVE BEEN TOLD BECAUSE A RECALL DATED 8/11/2016, 3 DAYS AFTER MY PURCHASE CONTRACT, AND I NEVER RECEIVED ANY NOTICE OF THIS RECALL NON WORK DONE.

NHTSA ODI #11090203

Mileage unknown · Mar 28, 2018
Suspension

THIS CAR HAS HAD 7 RECALLS. WHEN YOU REVIEW THE CARFAX OR NHTSA WEBSITE, IT ONLY SHOW OPEN RECALLS. THE REAR SUSPENSION PROBLEM WAS ORIGINALLY RECALLED 08/02/12 RECALL NUMBER 12V37-3000, DEALERS WERE INSTRUCTED TO INSPECT FOR LOOSE TIE-ROD NUTS AND REPLACE AS NEEDED. THEN 08/28/13 RECALL NOTICE 13V383-000 WAS ISSUED AND THE …

Read full complaint

THIS CAR HAS HAD 7 RECALLS. WHEN YOU REVIEW THE CARFAX OR NHTSA WEBSITE, IT ONLY SHOW OPEN RECALLS. THE REAR SUSPENSION PROBLEM WAS ORIGINALLY RECALLED 08/02/12 RECALL NUMBER 12V37-3000, DEALERS WERE INSTRUCTED TO INSPECT FOR LOOSE TIE-ROD NUTS AND REPLACE AS NEEDED. THEN 08/28/13 RECALL NOTICE 13V383-000 WAS ISSUED AND THE REAR TIE RODS WILL BE ENCASED IN EPOXY TO PREVENT FUTURE ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE. SINCE THIS DIDN'T WORK, IT WAS REPLACED WITH RECALL 16V596-000 ON 08/12/16. THIS RECALL SUPERSEDED 13V-383, THE AFFECTED VEHICLES THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY RECALLED BUT DID NOT HAVE BOTH SUSPENSION ARMS REPLACED. THOSE VEHICLES WERE SUPPOSED TO HAVE THEM REPLACED AND ENCAPSULATE THE LOCKNUTS. HERE IS THE PROBLEM... WITHIN 7 MONTHS OF NORMAL DRIVING, NO POTHOLES, NO SPEED BUMPS, THE CAR IS SO FAR OUT OF ALIGNMENT IT RUINED 2 REAR TIRES. PLUS, THE CAR CAN'T BE ALIGNED WITHOUT REPLACING THE TIE RODS TO THE COST OF $735! LEXUS REFUSES TO PAY FOR THIS SINCE IT IS OUT OF WARRANTY. THIS IS A RECALL THAT DID NOT FIX THE PROBLEM.

NHTSA ODI #11081861

Mileage unknown · Feb 22, 2018
Suspension

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 LEXUS HS 250 HYBRID. THE CONTACT RECEIVED A RECALL NOTIFICATION FOR NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 16V596000 (SUSPENSION); HOWEVER, THE PARTS TO DO THE REPAIR WERE UNAVAILABLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THE RECALL REPAIR. THE DEALER (LEXUS OF TACOMA IN …

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 LEXUS HS 250 HYBRID. THE CONTACT RECEIVED A RECALL NOTIFICATION FOR NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 16V596000 (SUSPENSION); HOWEVER, THE PARTS TO DO THE REPAIR WERE UNAVAILABLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THE RECALL REPAIR. THE DEALER (LEXUS OF TACOMA IN FIFE, WASHINGTON) WAS CONTACTED AND CONFIRMED THAT THE PARTS WERE NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE RECALL REMEDY. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE ISSUE. THE CONTACT HAD NOT EXPERIENCED A FAILURE. PARTS DISTRIBUTION DISCONNECT.

NHTSA ODI #11074253

48,533 miles · Jan 3, 2018
Suspension

THE 2010 HS250H REAR LOWER SUSPENSION ARM RECALL FLAW THE SAFETY RECALL WORK CAUSED NON-RECOVERABLE DAMAGES TO THE REAR TIRES OF MY 2010 HS250H. TORONTO LEXUS TOLD ME THAT THE DAMAGES TO THE TIRES WEREREAR DUE TO MISALIGNMENT BY WESTSIDE LEXUS. LEXUS USA ONLY REIMBURSED ME A SMALL PORTION OF THE TOTAL COST (REDO OF RECALL WORK…

Read full complaint

THE 2010 HS250H REAR LOWER SUSPENSION ARM RECALL FLAW THE SAFETY RECALL WORK CAUSED NON-RECOVERABLE DAMAGES TO THE REAR TIRES OF MY 2010 HS250H. TORONTO LEXUS TOLD ME THAT THE DAMAGES TO THE TIRES WEREREAR DUE TO MISALIGNMENT BY WESTSIDE LEXUS. LEXUS USA ONLY REIMBURSED ME A SMALL PORTION OF THE TOTAL COST (REDO OF RECALL WORK + 4 NEW TIRES). NEITHER LEXUS USA NOR WESTSIDE LEXUS WOULD PAY FOR THE DAMAGES ON THE TIRES. THE STORY: I PURCHASE THE LEXUS 2010 H250H FROM WESTSIDE LEXUS HOUSTON IN 2010. ON APRIL 10, 2015, WESTSIDE LEXUS DID A RECALL WORK ON THE REAR SUSPENSION ARMS (REAR TIE RODS). AT THE SAME TIME, I HAD WESTDISE LEXUS INSTALLED 4 NEW DUNLOP 225/45ZR18 TIRES. FEB. 2017 I MOVED BACK TO CANADA. ON THE LONG WEEKEND OF AUG. 2017, I WAS DRIVING ON HIGHWAY NEAR TORONTO. ONE OF REAR TIRE SUDDENLY BURST OUT. I SENT THE CAR TO A LEXUS SERVICE CENTER IN TORONTO FOR REPAIR. THE TECHNICIAN TOLD ME THAT THE TIRE WAS NOT REPAIRABLE. THERE WAS UNEVEN WEAR-OUT ON THE INNER EDGES OF BOTH REAR TIRES. TORONTO LEXUS TOLD ME THAT THE UNEVEN WEAR OF TIRES WAS DUE TO MISALIGNMENT OF TIRES BY WESTSIDE LEXUS. AND IT WAS ALSO RELATED TO THE REAR SUSPENSION ARMS RECALL WORK. SINCE EPOXY WAS APPLIED TO THE REAR TIE RODS, THOSE RODS WERE NO LONGER ADJUSTABLE. TORONTO LEXUS HAD TO REDO THE RECALL WORK AND REPLACE ALL 4 TIRES. TORONTO LEXUS CHARGED ME TOTAL $1762.82. THE TECHNICIAN ALSO HAD GIVEN ME A REPORT OF THE MISALIGNMENT BY WESTSIDE LEXUS.

NHTSA ODI #11058362

Mileage unknown · Dec 14, 2017
Power TrainSuspension

RECALL NO. 17V-619 AND 16V-596. THIS IS AN URGENT RECALL BUT THE DEALER NOT ABLE TO GET THE REPLACEMENT PARTS TO FIX MY CAR UNTIL THE NEXT 30 DAYS. AND DIDN'T OFFER ME A LOANER CAR DUE TO THIS WILL BE A SAFETY ISSUE IF I STILL DRIVE THIS CAR.

NHTSA ODI #11054834

Mileage unknown · Dec 11, 2017
Suspension

REAR LOWER SUSPENSION ARM RECALL WAS IN PLACE AUGUST OF 2016. AS OF DECEMBER OF 2017 DEALERS ARE STILL ADVISING OF PARTS NOT BEING AVAILABLE FOR REPAIR. REMEDY NOTICE HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM LEXUS ADVISING ALL DEALERS SHOULD BE PREPARED.

NHTSA ODI #11053891

Mileage unknown · May 7, 2017
Suspension

RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE FROM LEXUS (NHTSA RECALL NUMBER:16V596 RECALL DATE: AUGUST 10, 2016). POHANKA LEXUS IN CHANTILLY, VA SAID THEY DIDN'T HAVE THE PARTS BUT WOULD CONTACT ME WHEN THEY DID. I CONTACTED THEM AGAIN IN JANUARY 2017 AND THEY SAID THEY WOULD CONTACT ME IN FEBRUARY. AFTER NO CONTACT, I CONTACTED LEXUS CORPORATE…

Read full complaint

RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE FROM LEXUS (NHTSA RECALL NUMBER:16V596 RECALL DATE: AUGUST 10, 2016). POHANKA LEXUS IN CHANTILLY, VA SAID THEY DIDN'T HAVE THE PARTS BUT WOULD CONTACT ME WHEN THEY DID. I CONTACTED THEM AGAIN IN JANUARY 2017 AND THEY SAID THEY WOULD CONTACT ME IN FEBRUARY. AFTER NO CONTACT, I CONTACTED LEXUS CORPORATE IN APRIL 2017 AND NEVER RECEIVED A REPLY. THE RECALL WORK HAS NOT BEEN PERFORMED. WHEN DID THIS HAPPEN DATE IS APPROXIMATE.

NHTSA ODI #10983896

108,000 miles · May 5, 2017
Suspension

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 LEXUS HS 250 HYBRID. WHILE DRIVING, THE CONTACT FELT THE VEHICLE'S ALIGNMENT MOVING AROUND. THE TIRE WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE VEHICLE NEEDED TO BE REALIGNED DUE TO AN ISSUE WITH THE CONTROL ARM. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED; HOWEVER, …

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 LEXUS HS 250 HYBRID. WHILE DRIVING, THE CONTACT FELT THE VEHICLE'S ALIGNMENT MOVING AROUND. THE TIRE WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE VEHICLE NEEDED TO BE REALIGNED DUE TO AN ISSUE WITH THE CONTROL ARM. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED; HOWEVER, THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE, BUT DID NOT OFFER ANY ASSISTANCE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 108,000.

NHTSA ODI #10983639

Mileage unknown · May 4, 2017
Suspension

I RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE FROM LEXUS LAST YEAR (NHTSA RECALL NO 16V-596) RE REAR LOWER SUSPENSION ARM (NO.1) ASSEMBLIES. AS OF TODAY, WELL OVER SIX MONTHS LATER, LEXUS HAS BEEN UNABLE TO OFFER ME THIS FREE SERVICE TO CORRECT THE DEFECT. I HAVE TRIED TO ARRANGE IT MULTIPLE TIMES OVER THE PAST 6+ MONTHS AND THEY CLAIM THEY ARE …

Read full complaint

I RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE FROM LEXUS LAST YEAR (NHTSA RECALL NO 16V-596) RE REAR LOWER SUSPENSION ARM (NO.1) ASSEMBLIES. AS OF TODAY, WELL OVER SIX MONTHS LATER, LEXUS HAS BEEN UNABLE TO OFFER ME THIS FREE SERVICE TO CORRECT THE DEFECT. I HAVE TRIED TO ARRANGE IT MULTIPLE TIMES OVER THE PAST 6+ MONTHS AND THEY CLAIM THEY ARE OUT OF THE PART(S).

NHTSA ODI #10983514

Official recalls

4

17V619000 · Electrical System

Oct 4, 2017

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2010 Lexus HS 250h Hybrid vehicles. A component within the hybrid transaxle assembly may short circuit and result in a reduction or a complete loss of available power for moving the vehicle.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A complete loss of motive power can increase the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Lexus will notify owners, and dealers will replace the hybrid vehicle transaxle assembly, free of charge. The recall began on December 1, 2017. Owners may contact 1-800-255-3987. Toyota's number for this recall is HLE.

16V596000 · Suspension:rear

Aug 12, 2016

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2006-2011 Toyota RAV4 vehicles manufactured October 31, 2005, to September 7, 2010, and 2010 Lexus HS250h vehicles manufactured July 6, 2009, to August 26, 2010. The affected vehicles have rear suspension arms (rear tie rods) with adjusting lock nuts that may have been improperly tightened after servicing. As a result of being loose, the arm may have thread damage and may rust, possibly leading to the failure of the arm and an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Failure of the rear tie rod could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners and dealers will replace both rear suspension arms and encapsulate the locknuts, free of charge. The recall began on September 30, 2016. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331. Toyota's numbers for this recall are G0V for Toyota vehicles and GLK for Lexus vehicles. Note: This recall supersedes recall 13V-383, in which some vehicles were only inspected, sealed, and did not have both arms replaced. The affected vehicles were previously recalled under 13V-383, but did not have both rear suspension arms replaced at that time. Those vehicles need to have both arms replaced as part of this recall remedy.

13V383000 · Suspension:rear

Aug 28, 2013

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2006 through 2011 RAV4 and 2010 Lexus HS250h passenger vehicles manufactured from October 2005 through September 2010. If the nuts for adjusting the rear wheel alignment are improperly tightened during service, the rear suspension arm (rear tie rod) may develop unwanted movement and rust leading to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the rear tie rod will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Failure of the rear tie rod could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the tie rods and replace any that have rust or corrosion on the alignment adjustment threads. All of the rear tie rods will then be encased in an epoxy to prevent future environmental damage. Due to limitations in parts, the recall remedy will be launched in phases from September 2013 through mid-April 2014. All owners will receive notification of the recall, with most receiving second notifications when parts are available in their area. IMPORTANT: This recall supersedes Toyota and Lexus recall 12V-373. All vehicles that have been inspected and remedied under the previous recall need to be re-inspected and have the appropriate remedy applied.

12V373000 · Suspension:rear

Aug 2, 2012

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2006 through 2011 RAV4 and 2010 Lexus HS250h passenger vehicles manufactured from October 2005 through September 2010. If the nuts for adjusting the rear wheel alignment are improperly tightened during service, the rear suspension arm (rear tie rod) may develop unwanted movement and rust, leading to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the rear tie rod will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Failure of the rear tie rod could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the rear tie-rod nut for looseness and replace any suspect tie-rod found loose. Dealers will also affix instructions in multiple places to prevent improper servicing in the future. The recall began on November 30, 2012. Owners may contact Toyota at 1-800-331-4331 or Lexus at 1-800-255-3987.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

DP15007 · Low-speed Surging

Opened Oct 19, 2015 · Closed Feb 25, 2016

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Vehicle Speed Control

In a letter dated September 15, 2015, a consumer submitted a petition to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) alleging that software defects caused an accident experienced by his wife in their model year 2010 Lexus HS250H vehicle as she was attempting to park the vehicle. The petition requests that NHTSA have Toyota correct software defects in their electronic throttle control software and then issue a national recall of all effected [sic] vehicles and have Toyota replace the old faulty code with the new safer code. NHTSA has reviewed the material cited by the petitioner.The results of this review and our evaluation of the petition are set forth in the DP15-007 Petition Analysis Report, published in its entirety in the Federal Register and included in the repository for this investigation, available at www.safercar.gov. The Agency performed a thorough technical review of the concerns raised in the petition.The petitioner believes that the information from the Event Data Recorder (EDR), which records certain pieces of information for five seconds prior to a crash, shows that for the last 0.8 seconds prior to hitting the brick building the accelerator pedal was wide open at 100% at the same time the brake pedal was being depressed. Our analysis of data recovered from the EDR and from the engine management Hybrid Control Unit (HCU), together with vehicle inspection information contained in the petition, indicate that:1) Sometime during the last 0.512 seconds of the event time frame the accelerator pedal was fully applied; 2) At the airbag trigger point (EDR t = 0s) immediately following the vehicle's impact with the building, the stop lamp switch status was ON, indicating that the brake had been applied at least enough to illuminate the brake lights; 3) At no time during the event were the brake and the accelerator pedals depressed simultaneously (based on information from the HCU); and 4) The braking system on the vehicle was fully functional and was capable of stopping a vehicle at full throttle if meaningfully applied in sufficient time. After a thorough assessment of the material submitted by the petitioner, the information already in NHTSA's possession, and the potential risks to safety implicated by the petitioner's allegations, it is unlikely that an order concerning the notification and remedy of a safety-related defect would result from any proceeding initiated bygranting the petition.After full consideration of the potential for finding a safety related defect in the vehicle, and in view of NHTSA's enforcement priorities and its previous investigations into this issue, the petition is denied.