← New search

2013 Chrysler 300

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most 300 years

Owner complaints for the 2013 Chrysler 300 are substantially higher than the model-year median of 90.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

209 reports with mileage · 97 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Electrical System. Review the 131 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Power Train. Review the 58 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Engine. Review the 36 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

19 crash reports16 fire reports13 injury reports

Visibility complaints

7 reports
Clear category filter
10,200 miles · Mar 7, 2015
StructureVisibility

ON FRIDAY MARCH 7, 2015 MY CAR WAS PARKED OUTSIDE OF MY HOME AND THE SUNROOF SPONTANEOUSLY SHATTERED. I CONTACTED CHRYSLER DIRECTLY ABOUT MY 300 S AND WAS TOLD TO CONTACT MY LOCAL CHRYSLER DEALERSHIP. ONCE I GOT IN TOUCH WITH THE DEALER THEY TOLD ME IT'S SOMETHING THEY WOULD HAVE TO CONTACT CHRYSLER ABOUT AND THEY ARE UNSURE IF …

Read full complaint

ON FRIDAY MARCH 7, 2015 MY CAR WAS PARKED OUTSIDE OF MY HOME AND THE SUNROOF SPONTANEOUSLY SHATTERED. I CONTACTED CHRYSLER DIRECTLY ABOUT MY 300 S AND WAS TOLD TO CONTACT MY LOCAL CHRYSLER DEALERSHIP. ONCE I GOT IN TOUCH WITH THE DEALER THEY TOLD ME IT'S SOMETHING THEY WOULD HAVE TO CONTACT CHRYSLER ABOUT AND THEY ARE UNSURE IF MY WARRANTY WILL COVER IT. THE DEALER STATED THEY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF SUCH A THING BEFORE, HOWEVER I'VE SEEN NUMEROUS REPORTS. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10692697

16,000 miles · Feb 24, 2015
Visibility

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2013 CHRYSLER 300. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MOON ROOF WAS CRACKED AND THE GLASS SHATTERED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 16,000.

NHTSA ODI #10690193

23,000 miles · Mar 25, 2014
Visibility

THE WINDOWS WOULD NOT ROLL BACK UP IT'S BEEN TO THE SHOP NUMEROUS TIMES WE HAD THE SAME PROBLEM WITH OUR DODGE CARAVAN I'M SO OVER CHRYSLER CAUSE WE KEEP HAVING SAME PROBLEMS. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10574790

20,223 miles · Mar 9, 2014
Visibility

I WAS DRIVING ON FREEWAY AND SUNROOF EXPLODED. THERE WAS NO ROCKS OR ANY ADVERSE WEATHER. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10568054

800 miles · Jan 21, 2014
Visibility

CABIN AIR RECIRCULATE STOPS WORKING. CHRYSLER SAYS THAT IS NORMAL FUNCTION. BUT WHEN YOU ARE DRIVING BEHIND A DIESEL VEHICLE, YOU ARE STUCK BREATHING THAT AIR, AND IT MAKES ME SICK. IT GOES ON OCCASIONALLY, BUT ONLY FOR A MINUTE OR TWO. THEN IT GOES OFF, AND YOU CANNOT TURN IT BACK ON. I HAVE DRIVEN MANY MILES IN MANY CLIMATES A…

Read full complaint

CABIN AIR RECIRCULATE STOPS WORKING. CHRYSLER SAYS THAT IS NORMAL FUNCTION. BUT WHEN YOU ARE DRIVING BEHIND A DIESEL VEHICLE, YOU ARE STUCK BREATHING THAT AIR, AND IT MAKES ME SICK. IT GOES ON OCCASIONALLY, BUT ONLY FOR A MINUTE OR TWO. THEN IT GOES OFF, AND YOU CANNOT TURN IT BACK ON. I HAVE DRIVEN MANY MILES IN MANY CLIMATES AND GET THE SAME RESULT. I HAVE OWNED A CHRYSLER 300 BEFORE AND IT DID NOT FUNCTION LIKE THIS. NOR, ANY OTHER VEHICLE I HAVE OWNED. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10560872

6,935 miles · Nov 25, 2013
Visibility

MY MOON ROOF EXPLODED ON MY 2013 CHRYSLER 300S. I BOUGHT IT IN AUGUST AND ON NOVEMBER 5TH THIS OCCURRED. I WAS DRIVING 65MPH DOWN THE FREEWAY AND HEARD A LOUD EXPLOSION THAT I INITIALLY THOUGHT WAS A TIRE BUT THE WIND I HEARD WAS COMING FROM ABOVE ME WHEN MY MOON ROOF WAS CLOSED. MY MOON ROOF SHADE WAS CLOSED AND I COULD HEAR…

Read full complaint

MY MOON ROOF EXPLODED ON MY 2013 CHRYSLER 300S. I BOUGHT IT IN AUGUST AND ON NOVEMBER 5TH THIS OCCURRED. I WAS DRIVING 65MPH DOWN THE FREEWAY AND HEARD A LOUD EXPLOSION THAT I INITIALLY THOUGHT WAS A TIRE BUT THE WIND I HEARD WAS COMING FROM ABOVE ME WHEN MY MOON ROOF WAS CLOSED. MY MOON ROOF SHADE WAS CLOSED AND I COULD HEAR SOUNDS OF WIND AND GLASS FALLING ONTO IT. I DID NOT SEE ANY DEBRIS COMING AT ME WHEN THIS OCCURRED. IF MY MOON ROOF WASN'T CLOSED I WOULD HAVE BEEN SHOWERED WITH GLASS. I PULLED OFF AT THE NEAREST EXIT TO TAKE PICTURES OF THE DAMAGE AND CALLED IN TO HAVE AN OFFICER SHOW UP TO FILE A POLICE REPORT. PICTURES SHOW THE GLASS BOWING IN AN UPWARD FASHION. I HAVE FOUND MULTIPLE INCIDENTS AND CLAIMS SIMILAR TO MINE ON THE INTERNET. I WILL NEVER DRIVE WITH MY MOON ROOF SHADE OPEN WHILE THE GLASS IS CLOSED. I HAVE A WIFE AND TWO LITTLE GIRLS 3YRS AND 9 MONTHS THAT IF THIS HAPPENED AGAIN WHILE THEY WERE IN THE CAR WOULD BE A CATASTROPHE. I REGRET THAT I PURCHASED THE MODEL WITH A MOON ROOF. BEING THAT THERE ARE SO MANY PEOPLE WRITING ABOUT THESE EXPLOSIONS, I WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOMETHING MAKE IT TO THE MEDIA THE SAME WAY THAT SUV ROLLOVERS DID YEARS BACK ENSURING THAT CONSUMERS KNEW OF A GREAT DANGER THAT COULD COME UNTIL MANUFACTURERS PAID MORE ATTENTION TO THE ISSUE AT HAND. MY DEALERSHIP TOLD CHRYSLER THAT THEY WERE UNABLE TO IDENTIFY WHAT CAUSED THE EXPLOSION / GLASS BREAKAGE. THE EXPLOSION AND GLASS SHATTERING CAUSED PAINT DAMAGE TO THE CAR AS WELL. BEING THAT MY DEALERSHIP TOLD CHRYSLER THAT THEY COULD NOT VERIFY THE CAUSE, CHRYSLER'S STANCE IS THAT THEY ARE NOT WILLING TO DO ANYTHING. AFTER SEEING THE AMOUNT OF INCIDENTS SIMILAR TO MINE ACROSS MULTIPLE MAKES AND MODELS OF VEHICLES, I FEEL ADDITIONAL AWARENESS SHOULD BE GIVEN TO CONSUMERS REGARDING SUN / MOON ROOFS. MANUFACTURES SHOULD TAKE MORE RESPONSIBILITY ON THIS. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10553799

4,800 miles · Nov 18, 2013
Visibility

WENT THRU A DRIVE THRU MY VENT WAS OPEN SO I DECIDED TO CLOSE IT & THE ENTIRE GLASS SHATTERED! I CALLED THE DEALERSHIP & THEY SAID DROP IT OFF. THE ASST. MGR CALLED ME BACK MON. & ASKED WHAT HAPPENED, I TOLD HIM. THE NEXT DAY HE CALLED & SAID THEY FOUND THE PROBLEM, A PIECE OF PAPER THAT I WROTE GPS DIRECTIONS 2 WEEKS PRIOR WAS …

Read full complaint

WENT THRU A DRIVE THRU MY VENT WAS OPEN SO I DECIDED TO CLOSE IT & THE ENTIRE GLASS SHATTERED! I CALLED THE DEALERSHIP & THEY SAID DROP IT OFF. THE ASST. MGR CALLED ME BACK MON. & ASKED WHAT HAPPENED, I TOLD HIM. THE NEXT DAY HE CALLED & SAID THEY FOUND THE PROBLEM, A PIECE OF PAPER THAT I WROTE GPS DIRECTIONS 2 WEEKS PRIOR WAS STUCK IN THE MECHANISM. I WAS LIKE, A PIECE OF PAPER? I WENT TO THE DEALERSHIP TO HAVE THEM SHOW ME THE PAPER. I TOLD THEM THERE WAS NO WAY THAT PIECE OF PAPER THAT WAS IN THE CUBBY IN FRONT OF THE SHIFT LEVER: FLEW PAST MY HEAD FOLDED 2 MORE TIMES & STUCK IN THE VENT MECHANISM, THUS SHATTERING THE GLASS. THE PAPER (5"X 8") HAD ONLY BEEN IN THE CAR FOR 2 WEEKS & WAS FOLDER IN 1/4'S NOT 16THS. I SAID THERE IS NO WAY THAT PIECE OF PAPER FLEW PAST MY HEAD, FOLDED 2 MORE TIMES (WAS NOW 1.5" X 2") & STUCK IN THE MECHANISM. THEY SAID BECAUSE OF THIS IT IS NOT UNDER WARRANTY. I'VE TALKED TO FRIENDS, INSURANCE COMP (LOCAL & MAIN AGENT), 6 OTHER MECHANICS (2 AT OTHER CHRYSLER DEALERSHIPS), ALL SAY BOGUS! THE INS. ADJUSTER SAID IN HIS 30 YRS HE HAS NEVER HEARD OF SUCH A THING OR DID HE BELIEVE IT! I BOUGHT THE CAR DEC. 2012, IT HAS 4800 MILES SO I'M APPALLED! I ADDED TO THE EDMUNDS FORUM & RECEIVED A REPLY FROM THE 'HOST' OF THE FORUM: #160 OF 161 RE:2013 CHRYSLER MOONROOF GLASS SHATTERED [BHERTZ300] BY [XXX] HOST NOV 15, 2013 (12:01 PM), REPLYING TO: BHERTZ300 (NOV 13, 2013 5:46 AM) WOW. THAT HAS TO BE THE MOST BIZARRE "BLAME" STORY I'VE SEEN IN THIS DISCUSSION. THERE ARE A LOT OF INSTANCES OF DEALERSHIP SERVICE PERSONNEL BLAMING THE INCIDENT ON THE OWNER DROPPING SOMETHING ON THE SUNROOF, OR SOMETHING SPONTANEOUSLY FALLING FROM THE SKY ONTO THE SUNROOF, BUT THIS IS DEFINITELY THE FIRST "MAGIC PAPER" EXCUSE I'VE SEEN! IT'S A SHAME THAT EITHER SERVICE PERSONNEL ARE BLAMING IT ON AN OUTSIDE FORCE, OR DON'T KNOW ABOUT POTENTIAL DEFECTS IN GLASS. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR

NHTSA ODI #10552699

Official recalls

6

19V018000 · Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

Jan 15, 2019

Chrysler (FCA US LLC) is recalling certain 2010 Dodge Ram 3500, Ram 4500/5500, 2010-2011 Dodge Dakota, 2010-2014 Dodge Challenger, 2010-2015 Dodge Challenger, Chrysler 300, and 2010-2016 Jeep Wrangler vehicles. Upon deployment of the driver's frontal air bag, excessive internal pressure may cause the inflator to explode.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the passenger's frontal air bag, the inflator could explode with metal fragments striking the vehicle occupants potentially resulting in serious injury or death.

Remedy: Owners are advised not to drive their vehicle until the recall repair is complete. Chrysler will notify owners, and dealers will replace the passenger frontal air bag inflator, free of charge. The recall began February 4, 2019. Owners may contact Chrysler customer service at 1-800-853-1403. Chrysler's number for this recall is V01.

18V021000 · Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

Jan 9, 2018

Chrysler (FCA US LLC) is recalling certain 2009-2013 Jeep Wrangler, Chrysler 300, Dodge Challenger and Dodge Charger vehicles, and 2009-2011 Dodge Dakota vehicles sold, or ever registered, in the states of Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands (Saipan), and the U.S. Virgin Islands or "Zone A." Additionally, Chrysler is recalling certain 2009-2010 RAM 4500 Cab Chassis, RAM 5500 Cab Chassis, RAM 3500 Cab Chassis, Jeep Wrangler, Chrysler 300, Dodge Dakota, Dodge Challenger, and Dodge Charger vehicles ever registered in the states of Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia or "Zone B." Chrysler is also recalling certain 2009 RAM 3500, RAM 2500, RAM 4500 Cab Chassis, RAM 5500 Cab Chassis, Dodge Durango, Chrysler Aspen, RAM 3500 Cab Chassis, Jeep Wrangler, Chrysler 300, Dodge Dakota, Dodge Challenger, and Dodge Charger vehicles ever registered in the states of Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the passenger frontal air bag, these passenger air bag inflator may explode due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to absolute humidity and temperature cycling.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An inflator explosion may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.

Remedy: Owners are advised not to drive their vehicle until the recall repair is complete. Chrysler will notify owners, and dealers will replace the passenger frontal air bag inflator, free of charge. The recall began February 28, 2018. Owners may contact Chrysler customer service at 1-800-853-1403. Chrysler's number for this recall is U03.

17V435000 · Electrical System:alternator/generator/regulator

Jul 10, 2017

Chrysler (FCA US LLC) is recalling certain model year 2011-2014 Dodge Challenger, Dodge Charger, Chrysler 300, Dodge Durango, and 2012-2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles. The affected vehicles have electro-hydraulic power steering (EHPS) and are equipped with a 5.7L or a 3.6L engine and a 160, 180 or 220 amp alternator. In the affected vehicles, the alternator may suddenly fail.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the alternator fails, the vehicle may stall without warning, increasing the risk of a crash. There is also the possibility that the alternator may short circuit, increasing the risk of a fire.

Remedy: Chrysler will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the alternator and depending on the part number, will replace the alternator, if necessary, free of charge. The recall began February 12, 2018. Owners may contact Chrysler customer service at 1-800-853-1403. Chrysler's number for this recall is T36.

16V240000 · Power Train:automatic Transmission:control Module (tcm/pcm/tecm)

Apr 25, 2016

Chrysler (FCA US LLC) is recalling certain model year 2012-2014 Dodge Charger and Chrysler 300 vehicles manufactured February 15, 2011, to November 27, 2014, and 2014-2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles manufactured July 16, 2012, to December 22, 2015. The affected vehicles, equipped with an eight-speed automatic transmission and a monostable gear selector, may not adequately warn the driver when driver's door is opened and the vehicle is not in PARK, allowing them to exit the vehicle while the vehicle is still in gear.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Drivers thinking that their vehicle's transmission is in the PARK position may be struck by the vehicle and injured if they attempt to get out of the vehicle while the engine is running and the parking brake is not engaged.

Remedy: Chrysler will notify owners, and dealers will update the vehicle software to mitigate the risk of vehicle rollaway, free of charge. The recall began on June 24, 2016. Owners may contact Chrysler customer service at 1-800-853-1403. Chrysler's number for this recall is S27. Note: On October 19, 2016 Chrysler identified some previously repaired vehicles did not receive the complete software updates. Chrysler will renotify the affected owners, and dealers will update the software again.

14V634000 · Electrical System:alternator/generator/regulator

Oct 8, 2014

Chrysler Group LLC (Chrysler) is recalling certain model year 2011-2014 Chrysler 300, Dodge Charger, Challenger, and Durango; and 2012-2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles manufactured April 22, 2010, to January 2, 2014, and equipped with a 3.6L engine and a 160 amp alternator. In the affected vehicles, the alternator may suddenly fail.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the alternator fails, the vehicle may stall without warning, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Chrysler has notified owners, and dealers will replace the alternator, free of charge. The recall began on February 27, 2015. Owners may contact Chrysler customer service at 1-800-853-1403. Chrysler's number for this recall is P60.

13V610000 · Power Train:automatic Transmission

Dec 6, 2013

Chrysler Group LLC (Chrysler) is recalling certain model year 2013 Chrysler 300 AWD, Dodge Charger AWD, and Dodge Ram 1500 4x4 vehicles equipped with ZF all wheel drive ("AWD") 8HP45 transmissions. In the affected vehicles, the transmission output shaft may fracture.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: The transmission output shaft fracture could result in a loss of power, increasing the risk of a crash. Additionally, if the parking brake is not applied before exiting the vehicle, the vehicle may roll away despite the transmission being placed in 'Park'.

Remedy: Chrysler will notify owners, and dealers will inspect and replace the transmissions, as necessary, free of charge. The recall began on March 31, 2014. Customers may contact Chrysler at 1-800-853-1403. Chrysler's recall number is N65.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

2

EA21002 · Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture

Opened Sep 17, 2021 · No close date supplied

Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module; Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

EA16002 · Vehicle Rollaway, Engine On

Opened Feb 3, 2016 · Closed Jun 24, 2016

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Power Train:automatic Transmission:gear Position Indication (prndl)

On April 22, 2016, Fiat Chrysler Automotive US LLC, (FCA) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA regarding a defect that could result in unattended vehicle rollaway with the engine running in approximately 811,586 model year (MY) 2012 to 2014 Dodge Charger and Chrysler 300 vehicles and MY 2014 to 2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles equipped with 8-speed transmissions and a monostable gear selector (NHTSA Recall #16V-240, FCA Recall #S27). According to FCA's DIR, The existing strategies built into these vehicles to deter drivers from exiting the vehicle after failing to put the transmission into PARK have not stopped some from doing so. Drivers erroneously concluding that their vehicle's transmission is in the PARK position may be struck by the vehicle and injured if they attempt to get out of the vehicle while the engine is running and the parking brake is not engaged.The vehicles recalled by FCA are equipped with Monostable electronic (shift-by-wire) gearshift assemblies supplied by ZF Group (see Figure 1).The subject Monostable shifter has a single neutral position that it snaps back to when the driver releases the shift knob.Although the Monostable gearshift has the familiar appearance of a conventional console mechanical gearshift assembly, it has an unfamiliar movement that does not provide the tactile or visual feedback that drivers are accustomed to receiving from conventional shifters.Consequently, the driver must take additional time to verify that the desired gear position was achieved by checking the PRNDL display on the shift knob or the Electronic Vehicle Information Center (EVIC) display.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Power Train:automatic Transmission:gear Position Indication (prndl)

On April 22, 2016, Fiat Chrysler Automotive US LLC, (FCA) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA regarding a defect that could result in unattended vehicle rollaway with the engine running in approximately 811,586 model year (MY) 2012 to 2014 Dodge Charger and Chrysler 300 vehicles and MY 2014 to 2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles equipped with 8-speed transmissions and a monostable gear selector (NHTSA Recall #16V-240, FCA Recall #S27). According to FCA's DIR, The existing strategies built into these vehicles to deter drivers from exiting the vehicle after failing to put the transmission into PARK have not stopped some from doing so. Drivers erroneously concluding that their vehicle's transmission is in the PARK position may be struck by the vehicle and injured if they attempt to get out of the vehicle while the engine is running and the parking brake is not engaged.The vehicles recalled by FCA are equipped with Monostable electronic (shift-by-wire) gearshift assemblies supplied by ZF Group (see Figure 1).The subject Monostable shifter has a single neutral position that it snaps back to when the driver releases the shift knob.Although the Monostable gearshift has the familiar appearance of a conventional console mechanical gearshift assembly, it has an unfamiliar movement that does not provide the tactile or visual feedback that drivers are accustomed to receiving from conventional shifters.Consequently, the driver must take additional time to verify that the desired gear position was achieved by checking the PRNDL display on the shift knob or the Electronic Vehicle Information Center (EVIC) display.

Power Train:automatic Transmission:gear Position Indication (prndl)

On April 22, 2016, Fiat Chrysler Automotive US LLC, (FCA) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA regarding a defect that could result in unattended vehicle rollaway with the engine running in approximately 811,586 model year (MY) 2012 to 2014 Dodge Charger and Chrysler 300 vehicles and MY 2014 to 2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles equipped with 8-speed transmissions and a monostable gear selector (NHTSA Recall #16V-240, FCA Recall #S27). According to FCA's DIR, The existing strategies built into these vehicles to deter drivers from exiting the vehicle after failing to put the transmission into PARK have not stopped some from doing so. Drivers erroneously concluding that their vehicle's transmission is in the PARK position may be struck by the vehicle and injured if they attempt to get out of the vehicle while the engine is running and the parking brake is not engaged.The vehicles recalled by FCA are equipped with Monostable electronic (shift-by-wire) gearshift assemblies supplied by ZF Group (see Figure 1).The subject Monostable shifter has a single neutral position that it snaps back to when the driver releases the shift knob.Although the Monostable gearshift has the familiar appearance of a conventional console mechanical gearshift assembly, it has an unfamiliar movement that does not provide the tactile or visual feedback that drivers are accustomed to receiving from conventional shifters.Consequently, the driver must take additional time to verify that the desired gear position was achieved by checking the PRNDL display on the shift knob or the Electronic Vehicle Information Center (EVIC) display.