SkipThatYearREAL DATA. SMARTER CAR DECISIONS.
← New search

1993 Toyota SR5

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →
2Owner complaints

Model-year median: 5

0Recall campaigns

View recall details →

0Investigations

View investigation details →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
3
19905
19915
19922
1993
Compare all SR5 years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

Engine And Engine Cooling
1Structure
1

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

Limited mileage data: 1 of 2 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Engine And Engine Cooling. Review the 1 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Structure. Review the 1 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

0 crash reports0 fire reports0 injury reports

Structure complaints

1 reports
Clear category filter
314,000 miles · Jun 24, 2009
Structure

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1994 (NA) TOYOTA SR5. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRAME WAS RUSTED ON HIS VEHICLE. HE RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE AND TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER FOR REPAIR, BUT THEY ONLY PERFORMED AN INSPECTION. THE VEHICLE FAILED THE INSPECTION DUE TO THE RUSTED FRAME. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THEY COULD NOT ASSI…

Read full complaint

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1994 (NA) TOYOTA SR5. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRAME WAS RUSTED ON HIS VEHICLE. HE RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE AND TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER FOR REPAIR, BUT THEY ONLY PERFORMED AN INSPECTION. THE VEHICLE FAILED THE INSPECTION DUE TO THE RUSTED FRAME. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THEY COULD NOT ASSIST AND SUGGESTED THAT HE GET RID OF THE VEHICLE BECAUSE IT COULD NOT BE DRIVEN. THE NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER WAS UNKNOWN. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 314,000.

NHTSA ODI #10274816

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

0

No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.