← New search

2008 Toyota Prius

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Prius years

Owner complaints for the 2008 Toyota Prius are substantially higher than the model-year median of 164.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

1,248 reports with mileage · 249 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Exterior Lighting. Review the 579 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 235 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 171 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

152 crash reports6 fire reports50 injury reports

Service Brakes complaints

145 reports
Clear category filter
112,000 miles · Apr 17, 2018
Service Brakes

BRAKE, ABS, VSC, ! WITH CIRCLE AROUND IT, AND A SOLID HIGH PITCH ALARM CAME ON WHILE DRIVING AND WHEN COMING TO A RED LIGHT AT 55MPH, I NOTICED MY BRAKES HAD FAILED. THIS HAD ALMOST CAUSED ME AN ACCIDENT BY RUNNING INTO THE BACK END OF ANOTHER CAR. THANKFULLY I HAD MY FOOT AND THE BRAKE PEDDLE PRESSED ALMOST THROUGH THE FIREWALL…

Read full complaint

BRAKE, ABS, VSC, ! WITH CIRCLE AROUND IT, AND A SOLID HIGH PITCH ALARM CAME ON WHILE DRIVING AND WHEN COMING TO A RED LIGHT AT 55MPH, I NOTICED MY BRAKES HAD FAILED. THIS HAD ALMOST CAUSED ME AN ACCIDENT BY RUNNING INTO THE BACK END OF ANOTHER CAR. THANKFULLY I HAD MY FOOT AND THE BRAKE PEDDLE PRESSED ALMOST THROUGH THE FIREWALL AS WAS ABLE TO STOP. THIS IS NOT A HAZARD, THIS IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS FOR ANY PRIUS DRIVEN LIKE THIS.

NHTSA ODI #11088541

113,000 miles · Apr 13, 2018
Service Brakes

THE ABS WARNING CAME ON AND WE TOOK IT TO THE DEALERSHIP FOR DIAGNOSIS. APPARENTLY THERE WAS A "WARRANTY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM" ATTACHED TO THIS CAR FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROBLEM, THE BRAKE ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY". HOWEVER, EVEN THIS IS A KNOWN MANUFACTURING-DEFECT, TOYOTA IS REFUSING TO PAY FOR THIS SERVICE BECAUSE THEY REASONED THAT TH…

Read full complaint

THE ABS WARNING CAME ON AND WE TOOK IT TO THE DEALERSHIP FOR DIAGNOSIS. APPARENTLY THERE WAS A "WARRANTY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM" ATTACHED TO THIS CAR FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROBLEM, THE BRAKE ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY". HOWEVER, EVEN THIS IS A KNOWN MANUFACTURING-DEFECT, TOYOTA IS REFUSING TO PAY FOR THIS SERVICE BECAUSE THEY REASONED THAT THIS HAS FALLEN OUT OF THEIR WARRANTY DATES, WHICH INCLUDED 2 TYPES OF COVERAGE: PRIMARY COVERAGE ENDED 12/31/2017 AND SECONDARY COVERAGE FOR CAR LESS THAN 10 YEARS OLD FROM THE FIRST USE OR 150,000 MILES, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST. ACCORDING TO TOYOTA, THE FIRST USE OF MY TOYOTA PRIUS IS 10/13/2007, AND 10 YEARS FROM THAT DATE IS 10/13/2017, WHICH CAME BEFORE EVEN THE DEADLINE FOR PRIMARY COVERAGE. THIS "WARRANTY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM" IS FOR 2004-2009 PRIUS. YOU WOULD THINK IT WILL COVER AT LEAST UNTIL THE LAST MANUFACTURED CAR OF 2009, BUT THAT WAS NOT THE CASE. ALSO, THE DEALER AND THE MANUFACTURER BOTH STATED THAT THEY CAN'T FIX IT UNLESS YOU ACTUALLY HAVE THE ABS LIGHT TURNED ON AND IT WARNS ABOUT THE ISSUE. YOU WOULD THINK IF THAT LIGHT COMES ON, IT WILL BE VERY DANGEROUS IF YOU ARE DRIVING 60 MPH ON THE FREEWAY AND YOU CAN'T BRAKE! TOYOTA DEFINITELY DID NOT THINK SO. THE REPAIRS I WAS QUOTED FOR THIS PARTICULAR PROBLEM IS $2800 + TAX, WHICH IS EXPENSIVE AND I CAN'T AFFORD TO PAY FOR IT. I FEEL RIDICULED BECAUSE THIS IS A MANUFACTURING DEFECT AND IT IS NOT SOMETHING RELATED TO WEAR-AND-TEAR. TOYOTA ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THIS IS A MANUFACTURER DEFECT AND THE REASON THEY REFUSE TO PAY FOR THIS SERVICE IS BECAUSE IT FELL OUTSIDE OF THE "EXTENDED WARRANTY PERIOD". WE DID NOT EVEN RECEIVE THE NOTICE TO BEGIN WITH; I FOUND THIS OUT ON THE INTERNET AND APPARENTLY, A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE THIS PROBLEM WITH THEIR VEHICLES AND TOYOTA EITHER DRAGGED OUT THE TIMELINE OF REPAIR SO THAT IT WILL SURPASS THE DEADLINE STATED ON THE LETTER OF THE PROGRAM.

NHTSA ODI #11084939

Mileage unknown · Apr 13, 2018
Service Brakes

ABS,BREAK AND THE VSC LIGHTS ARE ON WHICH IS INDICATE THAT MY ACTUATOR ABS SYSTEM FAILS IN MY PRIUS 2008 . TECHNICIAN NOTES: C1256 ACCUMULATOR LOW PRESSURE. 0.00 0.00 C1391 ABNORMAL LEAK OF PRESSURE. THE ABS BRAKE ACTUATOR HAS FAILED. THIS A KNOWN ISSUE. TO RECTIFY THIS ISSUE WE WILL NEED TO REPLACE THE ABS BRAKE ACTUATO…

Read full complaint

ABS,BREAK AND THE VSC LIGHTS ARE ON WHICH IS INDICATE THAT MY ACTUATOR ABS SYSTEM FAILS IN MY PRIUS 2008 . TECHNICIAN NOTES: C1256 ACCUMULATOR LOW PRESSURE. 0.00 0.00 C1391 ABNORMAL LEAK OF PRESSURE. THE ABS BRAKE ACTUATOR HAS FAILED. THIS A KNOWN ISSUE. TO RECTIFY THIS ISSUE WE WILL NEED TO REPLACE THE ABS BRAKE ACTUATOR, RESISTOR, AND FLUSH THE SYSTEM. TSB-0032-16 STATES THAT THIS IS A COMMON ISSUE CAUSED BY AN INTERNAL BRAKE FLUID LEAK IN THE BRAKE ACTUATOR. THE FRONT BRAKE PADS LOOK ALMOST NEW, AND THE ROTORS ARE IN GOOD SHAPE. THE REAR SHOES AND DRUMS ARE IN GOOD SHAPE AS WELL. THE NOISE THE CUSTOMER IS HEARING IS THE ABS ENGAGING. THIS IS COVERED UNDER WARRANTY FROM TOYOTA FOR 10 YEARS, 100,000 MILES. I CALLED TO SEE IF THEY WOULD HONOR THIS. THEY SAID THAT THE VEHCILE IS OUT OF WARRANTY. BRK0 RP R&R ABS BRAKE ACTUATOR AND BLEED THE SYSTEM. LABOR : $624.75 EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY PARTS : $1,981.39 IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND SUBLET : $0.00 NEITHER ASSUMES NOR AUTHORIZES ANY PERSON TO ASSUME FOR IT ANY LIABILITY IN $0.00 CONNECTION WITH THE SALE OF SAID PRODUCTS. SUPPLY CHARG OTHER FEES : $30.00 SUBTOTAL : $2,636.14 X____________________________________________________ DATE ________________ SALES TAX : $165.94 TOTAL : $2,802.08 PAID BY : PAY REF : PAID : $0.00 DUE : $2,802.08

NHTSA ODI #11084867

150,000 miles · Apr 11, 2018
Service Brakes

BRAKE ACTUATOR FAILING (WARNING LIGHTS ON, CLUNKING SOUND WHEN DEPRESSING BRAKE, INCREASED FORCE TO APPLY BRAKES) TWO MONTHS AFTER EXTENDED "SERVICE CAMPAIGN" ENDED. HAD A RECALL BEEN ISSUED I WOULD HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED THERE WAS A TECHNICAL PROBLEM THAT NEEDS TO BE FIXED. A KNOWN TECHNICAL ISSUE THAT AFFECTS A VEHICLE'S BRAKES AN…

Read full complaint

BRAKE ACTUATOR FAILING (WARNING LIGHTS ON, CLUNKING SOUND WHEN DEPRESSING BRAKE, INCREASED FORCE TO APPLY BRAKES) TWO MONTHS AFTER EXTENDED "SERVICE CAMPAIGN" ENDED. HAD A RECALL BEEN ISSUED I WOULD HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED THERE WAS A TECHNICAL PROBLEM THAT NEEDS TO BE FIXED. A KNOWN TECHNICAL ISSUE THAT AFFECTS A VEHICLE'S BRAKES AND ANTI- LOCKING BRAKING SYSTEM SHOULD RESULT IN A RECALL.

NHTSA ODI #11084663

142,583 miles · Apr 4, 2018
Service Brakes

IN BUMPER TO BUMPER TRAFFIC THE BRAKES FAILED TO STOP THE CAR WHEN APPROACHING A TRAFFIC LIGHT. IT BUMPED THE VEHICLE IN FRONT AT A LOW SPEED WITHOUT INJURIES OR DAMAGE.

NHTSA ODI #11083300

141,160 miles · Mar 23, 2018
Electrical SystemExterior LightingService Brakes

MY MOTHER HAS A 2008 PRIUS THAT HAS TWO SERIOUS ISSUES THAT TOYOTA HAS ACKNOWLEDGED AND EVEN OFFERED TO FIX UNDER WHAT THEY CALL A SUPPORT PROGRAM. SOUNDS GREAT RIGHT? HERE'S THE PROBLEM. 1. SHE NEVER RECEIVED A LETTER NOTIFYING HER OF THE PROBLEM AND THAT IT NEEDED TO BE FIXED (AND ONLY NOW THAT THE ISSUES HAVE BECOME HER ISSUE…

Read full complaint

MY MOTHER HAS A 2008 PRIUS THAT HAS TWO SERIOUS ISSUES THAT TOYOTA HAS ACKNOWLEDGED AND EVEN OFFERED TO FIX UNDER WHAT THEY CALL A SUPPORT PROGRAM. SOUNDS GREAT RIGHT? HERE'S THE PROBLEM. 1. SHE NEVER RECEIVED A LETTER NOTIFYING HER OF THE PROBLEM AND THAT IT NEEDED TO BE FIXED (AND ONLY NOW THAT THE ISSUES HAVE BECOME HER ISSUES IS SHE AWARE THERE WAS A RECALL AND 2. TOYOTA SET A TIME FRAME TO FIX THESE ISSUES WHICH SHE IS NOW PAST. AGAIN, SOUNDS LIKE THEY TRIED TO DO THE RIGHT THING? THE FIRST ISSUE IS AN INTERNAL LEAK CAUSING HER BRAKE BOOSTER TO MALFUNCTION (WHICH IS A TOYOTA ISSUE, NOT AN AGE OR WEAR AND TEAR ISSUE) AND THE SECOND ISSUE IS THAT THERE ARE NO LIGHTS ON HER DASH BOARD(COMBINATION METER) WHICH MEANS THAT FOR A PRIUS, THERE IS NO WAY TO TELL YOUR SPEED OR GAS LEVELS. SO TAKE THAT IN. SHE HAS A CAR, THAT HAS TWO MAJOR ISSUES, ONE OF WHICH TOYOTA FIXED UP UNTIL DEC OF 2017 AND THE OTHER DEC OF 2016 AND ARE CAUSED BY FAULTY PARTS AND LABOR BY TOYOTA, AND THEY WILL NO LONGER FIX THESE. THE BREAK ISSUE COST $2400 AND THE DASH $800. FOR AN ISSUE THAT IS CAUSED BY TOYOTA NOT THE DRIVER OR WEAR AND TEAR AND IS A SERIOUS SAFETY ISSUE. THIS IS THE KIND OF COMPANY TOYOTA REALLY IS. SEVERAL YEARS AGO MY MOM RECEIVED ABOUT 14 LETTERS STATING SHE NEEDED TO COME IN AND REPLACE HER FLOOR MATTS BECAUSE THEY WERE PART OF A RECALL. FLOOR MATS! SHE'S RECEIVED RECALL ISSUES ON HER DOOR LOCK AMONG OTHER THINGS THAT SHE PROMPTLY HAD FIXED. SHE TOOK HER CAR TO THE TOYOTA DEALERSHIP MANY TIMES AND NO ONE EVER MENTIONED THESE ISSUES OR "SUPPORT PROGRAMS". BUT BREAKS AND DASHBOARDS AREN'T AS IMPORTANT AS FLOOR MATS OR DOOR LOCKS. I WOULD LOVE FOR TOYOTA TO EXPLAIN TO ME AND EVERYONE ELSE, HOW SOMETHING THEY ACKNOWLEDGE IS A TOYOTA ISSUE, HAS AN EXPIRATION DATE TO GET FIXED BY THEM.

NHTSA ODI #11081039

198,000 miles · Mar 17, 2018
Seat BeltsService Brakes

MY CAR HAS BEEN MAKING NOISES FOR A COUPLE YEARS NOW AND I RECENTLY FOUND OUT IT'S BEEN MY BRAKE ACTUATOR. DUE TO THE ACTUATOR NOT KEEPING COMPRESSION THE ABS BRAKE SYSTEM ISN'T WORKING PROPERLY AND MY CAR ROLLS RIGHT OUT OF THE DRIVEWAY INTO THE ROAD DIE TO POOR BRAKING SYSTEM. I'VE CALLED TOYOTA AND SPOKEN WITH THE DEALERSHIP …

Read full complaint

MY CAR HAS BEEN MAKING NOISES FOR A COUPLE YEARS NOW AND I RECENTLY FOUND OUT IT'S BEEN MY BRAKE ACTUATOR. DUE TO THE ACTUATOR NOT KEEPING COMPRESSION THE ABS BRAKE SYSTEM ISN'T WORKING PROPERLY AND MY CAR ROLLS RIGHT OUT OF THE DRIVEWAY INTO THE ROAD DIE TO POOR BRAKING SYSTEM. I'VE CALLED TOYOTA AND SPOKEN WITH THE DEALERSHIP THEY'RE AWARE OF THE SAFETY ISSUE BUT STATE MY CAR IS OUTSIDE OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD AND WANT $3400 FOR REPAIRS THAN MAY INCREASE ONCE WORK HAS BEGUN.

NHTSA ODI #11079891

141,000 miles · Mar 15, 2018
Service Brakes

HAVE BEEN HEARING MORE NOISES THAN USUAL AND THEN THE BRAKE WASN'T STAYING ENGAGED AFTER STARTING THE VEHICLE AND PUTTING IT IN GEAR. THEN ALL BRAKE WARNING LIGHTS HAVE COME ON, BRAKE, ABS, VSC, AND (O), AND STAYED ON. LOCAL DEALERSHIP IS SAYING IT'S THE BRAKE ACTUATOR AND QUOTED ME $2,900 TO FIX. REALLY?!

NHTSA ODI #11079554

149,800 miles · Mar 4, 2018
EngineService BrakesVehicle Speed Control

RUNNING ON A CITY STREET AT 20 MILES, GAS PEDAL WOULD NOT WORK, COULD NOT DECREASE OR INCREASE MILEAGE. BRAKE PEDAL WORKED BUT WENT ALL THE WAY DOWN AND FINALLY STOPPED WITH A JERK. A CONSTANT NOISE AND AND HAS A TOYOTA CONFIRMED BRAKE ACCTUATOR PROBLEM THAT TOYOTA REFUSES TO HELP SINCE EXTRA WARRANT EXPIRED IN 12/2017

NHTSA ODI #11076134

85,000 miles · Feb 27, 2018
Service Brakes

PURCHASED 2008 PRIUS IN JULY 2017. THE CAR HAS 85K MILES ON IT NOW. RECENTLY FOUND OUT THE BRAKE ACTUATORS NEED TO BE REPLACED. THIS WAS DIAGNOSED AT THE NEAREST TOYOTA DEALERSHIP. THEY QUOTED IT WILL BE $2200.00 TO REPLACE. IN ADDITION, THE DEALER SAID IT WAS A KNOWN SAFETY ISSUE AND THERE WAS NO WARRANTEE AVAILABLE FOR IT…

Read full complaint

PURCHASED 2008 PRIUS IN JULY 2017. THE CAR HAS 85K MILES ON IT NOW. RECENTLY FOUND OUT THE BRAKE ACTUATORS NEED TO BE REPLACED. THIS WAS DIAGNOSED AT THE NEAREST TOYOTA DEALERSHIP. THEY QUOTED IT WILL BE $2200.00 TO REPLACE. IN ADDITION, THE DEALER SAID IT WAS A KNOWN SAFETY ISSUE AND THERE WAS NO WARRANTEE AVAILABLE FOR IT. THIS KNOWN SAFETY ISSUE IS A VERY EXPENSIVE ORDEAL TO HANDLE. THIS IS A TOYOTA STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY PROBLEM FROM THE INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE SERVICE DEPT. AT THE TOYOTA DEALER. IF THERE WAS A EXTENDED WARRANTEE OUT THERE THAT TERMED, THEY NEED TO RE-INSTATE IT. TOYOTA NEEDS TO CORRECT KNOWN SAFETY ISSUES AS SUCH, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT COMES TO THE BRAKING SYSTEM.

NHTSA ODI #11075333

Official recalls

4

12V536000 · Engine And Engine Cooling; Hybrid Propulsion System: Inverter

Nov 14, 2012

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Hybrid Propulsion System: Inverter

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Engine And Engine Cooling

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

12V537000 · Steering; Steering:gear Box:shaft Sector

Nov 14, 2012

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Steering:gear Box:shaft Sector

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Steering

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

10V036000 · Equipment:other:labels

Feb 3, 2010

SOUTHEAST TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2005-2011 PASSENGER VEHICLES FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 110, "TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS." THESE VEHICLES WERE SOLD WITHOUT THE REQUISITE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY MODIFICATION LABELS.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A DRIVER MAY OVERLOAD A VEHICLE WHICH MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL MAIL TO CONSUMERS THE CORRECTED LABEL OR THE CUSTOMER WILL HAVE THE OPTION FOR DEALERS TO INSTALL THE LABEL FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 27, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT SOUTHEAST TOYOTA AT 1-800-301-6859.

09V388000 · Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

Oct 5, 2009

TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2004-2010 PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL CAN GET STUCK IN THE WIDE OPEN POSITION DUE TO ITS BEING TRAPPED BY AN UNSECURED OR INCOMPATIBLE DRIVER'S FLOOR MAT.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A STUCK OPEN ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY RESULT IN VERY HIGH VEHICLE SPEEDS AND MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO STOP THE VEHICLE, WHICH COULD CAUSE A CRASH, SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH.

Remedy: TOYOTA FILED AN AMENDED DEFECT REPORT ON NOVEMBER 25, 2009, STATING THAT DEALERS WILL MODIFY THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL AND, ON CERTAIN VEHICLES, ALTER THE SHAPE OF THE FLOOR SURFACE UNDER THE PEDAL. THESE CHANGES ADDRESS THE RISK OF PEDAL ENTRAPMENT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITH THE FLOOR MAT. REDESIGNED ACCELERATOR PEDALS WILL BECOME AVAILABLE BEGINNING IN APRIL 2010 AND DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY MODIFIED PEDAL WITH THE NEW PEDAL IF DESIRED. ALSO, DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY GENUINE TOYOTA OR LEXUS ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MATS WITH REDESIGNED ALL-WEATHER MATS, OR REPURCHASE THE PREVIOUS MATS FROM OWNERS WHO DO NOT WANT THE NEW ONES. ADDITIONALLY, SOFTWARE MODIFICATIONS WILL BE INSTALLED ON CAMRY, AVALON AND LEXUS ES 350, IS 350 AND IS 250 MODELS THAT WILL ENSURE THAT THE BRAKE OVERRIDES THE ACCELERATOR IN THE EVENT BOTH BRAKE AND ACCELERATOR PEDALS ARE APPLIED. TOYOTA WILL BEGIN MAILING LETTERS TO OWNERS ON DECEMBER 31, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TOYOTA AT 1-800-331-4331, LEXUS AT 1-800-255-3987.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

2

DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds

Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System

NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.

DP13001 · Intermediate Steering Shaft Separation

Opened Feb 21, 2013 · Closed Apr 8, 2020

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Steering; Steering:column; Steering:linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Additional source detail variants (3)

Steering:column

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Steering:linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Steering

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606