← New search

2008 Toyota Prius

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Prius years

Owner complaints for the 2008 Toyota Prius are substantially higher than the model-year median of 164.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

1,248 reports with mileage · 249 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Exterior Lighting. Review the 579 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 235 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 171 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

152 crash reports6 fire reports50 injury reports

Service Brakes, Hydraulic complaints

171 reports
Clear category filter
9,980 miles · Feb 4, 2010
Service Brakes, HydraulicCrashInjury

I WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 25MPH. A FIRE ENGINE ENTERED THE INTERSECTION AHEAD OF ME WITHOUT WARNING. I APPLIED THE BRAKES IMMEDIATELY, BUT THEY LOCKED UP AND I SLID ON ICE. I COULD NOT STOP AND HIT THE FIRE ENGINE. MY VEHICLE WAS TOTALED AND I WAS FOUND AT FAULT FOR THE ACCIDENT. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10305290

8,500 miles · Feb 4, 2010
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

2008 TOYOTA PRIUS - THE CAR HAD STRANGE ACCELERATION ISSUES AND WOULD ACT LIKE IT WAS GOING OVER POTHOLES WHEN THE ROAD WAS SMOOTH. THE ABS WOULD ENGAGE WHEN THE ROADS WERE DRY, EVEN AT SLOW SPEEDS. I WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 15 MPH, LOOKING FOR A PARKING SPACE. I SAW ONE, APPLIED PRESSURE TO THE BRAKE PEDAL, AND MY CAR LUR…

Read full complaint

2008 TOYOTA PRIUS - THE CAR HAD STRANGE ACCELERATION ISSUES AND WOULD ACT LIKE IT WAS GOING OVER POTHOLES WHEN THE ROAD WAS SMOOTH. THE ABS WOULD ENGAGE WHEN THE ROADS WERE DRY, EVEN AT SLOW SPEEDS. I WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 15 MPH, LOOKING FOR A PARKING SPACE. I SAW ONE, APPLIED PRESSURE TO THE BRAKE PEDAL, AND MY CAR LURCHED SIDEWAYS, TO THE RIGHT. I THOUGHT MY AXLE HAD BROKEN. I GOT OUT AND SAW THAT I HAD HIT THE CAR THAT WAS PARKED ALONG THE STREET, BUT HAD NOT CAUSED ANY DAMAGE TO IT. MY TIRE RODS AND AXLE WERE BROKEN AND DAMAGE TO MY STEERING COLUMN WAS FOUND. I THOUGHT THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN COVERED BY MY WARRANTY, BUT THE DEALERSHIP SAID IT WAS CAUSED BY HITTING THE CAR NEXT TO ME. MY CAR SHOULD NOT HAVE GONE SIDEWAYS WHEN I BRAKED. THE DEALERSHIP HOOKED THE CAR UP TO THE COMPUTER AND SAID THAT THERE WAS NO RECORD OF ANY FAILURES. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10305283

13,605 miles · Feb 4, 2010
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

PRIUS BRAKE PROBLEMS - ON 4-24-08 I BROUGHT MY PRUIS INTO TOYOTA TO REPLACE A BRAKE ACTUATOR. AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT MY DASH BOARD LIT UP LIKE A CHRISTMAS TREE. IT TOOK TOYOTA ABOUT 4 WEEKS TO FIX THE PROBLEM. IS THIS RELATED TO THE BRAKE PROBLEMS RELEASED RECENTLY OR A NEW PROBLEM. THERE WAS NO ACCIDENT INVOLVED. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10305250

34,000 miles · Feb 4, 2010
Electronic Stability Control (esc)Service Brakes, Hydraulic

2008 TOYOTA PRIUS. BRAKES FAIL/INOPERATIVE WHEN DRIVING OVER BUMPY ROADS AND/OR POTHOLES. IT SEEMS AS THOUGH THE ABS OR THE ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL ENGAGES WHEN THERE IS NO NEED. THIS IS THE SAME TYPE OF INCIDENT THAT IS BEING REPORTED IN NEWER PRIUS MODELS AS WELL. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10305234

32,000 miles · Feb 4, 2010
Service Brakes, HydraulicCrash

2008 PRIUS BRAKE ACCELERATION. I PULLED SLOWLY INTO MY REGULAR PARKING SPOT AT WORK . MY PRIUS ALL OF A SUDDEN SPED UP AND I COULDN'T STOP IT BEFORE THE CAR HIT THE UTILITY BOX ON THE SIDE OF OUR OFFICE. I HAVE PICTURES AND A WITNESS. I INFORMED MY INSURANCE "ALLSTATE" WHEN THE PROBLEM WAS BROUGHT TO PUBLIC ATTENTION BUT …

Read full complaint

2008 PRIUS BRAKE ACCELERATION. I PULLED SLOWLY INTO MY REGULAR PARKING SPOT AT WORK . MY PRIUS ALL OF A SUDDEN SPED UP AND I COULDN'T STOP IT BEFORE THE CAR HIT THE UTILITY BOX ON THE SIDE OF OUR OFFICE. I HAVE PICTURES AND A WITNESS. I INFORMED MY INSURANCE "ALLSTATE" WHEN THE PROBLEM WAS BROUGHT TO PUBLIC ATTENTION BUT BECAUSE I HAD MOVED AND NO LONGER HAVE ALLSTATE, THEY WERE NOT CONCERNED. I HAVE NOTIFIED TOYOTA AND AS OF THIS DATE, THEY HAVE NOT COMMENTED. I WAS TOLD AT THE TIME THAT IT WAS MY FAULT, THEREFORE I ASSUMED IT MUST HAVE BEEN. I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT I EXPERIENCED THIS PROBLEM AND NOW REALIZE I WAS NOT AT FAULT. THE ACCIDENT IS ON MY RECORD FOR THREE YEARS AND MY PRIUS HAD TO HAVE A NEW BUMPER WHICH CAUSES IT TO NO LONGER HAVE FULL RESALE VALUE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10305215

30,000 miles · Feb 4, 2010
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

WHEN TRYING TO BRAKE AT SLOW SPEEDS FOR VERY BUMPY, ROUGH OR POT HOLED ROAD, THE BRAKE PEDAL GOES DEAD FOR A VERY SHORT INSTANT. IT FEELS LIKE THERE IS NO BRAKE PEDAL AT ALL. YOUR NOT SURE IF YOU LOST YOUR BRAKES OR WHAT. IT IS LIKE IT SKIPS A BEAT OR SOMETHING. IT MUST BE WHEN THE CAR IS IN THE TRADITIONAL BRAKING MODE VERSUS …

Read full complaint

WHEN TRYING TO BRAKE AT SLOW SPEEDS FOR VERY BUMPY, ROUGH OR POT HOLED ROAD, THE BRAKE PEDAL GOES DEAD FOR A VERY SHORT INSTANT. IT FEELS LIKE THERE IS NO BRAKE PEDAL AT ALL. YOUR NOT SURE IF YOU LOST YOUR BRAKES OR WHAT. IT IS LIKE IT SKIPS A BEAT OR SOMETHING. IT MUST BE WHEN THE CAR IS IN THE TRADITIONAL BRAKING MODE VERSUS RE-GEN MODE. THIS HAS HAPPENED ABOUT 10 TIMES OVER 2 YEARS. NO ACCIDENT. IT JUST MAKES YOU STOP SLOWER/LONGER. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10305191

Mileage unknown · Feb 4, 2010
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

2008 PRIUS ON VERY SLUSHY ROADS CAN MOMENTARILY "LOSE" ITS BRAKES WHEN TRANSITIONING FROM REGENERATIVE BRAKING TO THE WET AND INEFFECTIVE FRICTION BRAKES AT ABOUT 6 MPH. THE FRICTION BRAKES THEN DRY QUICKLY AND WORK. CONSIDER REQUIRING AUTOMATIC INTERMITTENT LIGHT FRICTION BRAKE APPLICATION DURING REGENERATIVE BRAKING SO THAT …

Read full complaint

2008 PRIUS ON VERY SLUSHY ROADS CAN MOMENTARILY "LOSE" ITS BRAKES WHEN TRANSITIONING FROM REGENERATIVE BRAKING TO THE WET AND INEFFECTIVE FRICTION BRAKES AT ABOUT 6 MPH. THE FRICTION BRAKES THEN DRY QUICKLY AND WORK. CONSIDER REQUIRING AUTOMATIC INTERMITTENT LIGHT FRICTION BRAKE APPLICATION DURING REGENERATIVE BRAKING SO THAT THE FRICTION BRAKES ARE READY TO TAKE OVER WHEN THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO. THERE IS NO SINGLE INCIDENT DATE; IT'S AN ONGOING PROBLEM. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10305178

Mileage unknown · Feb 4, 2010
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

2008 PRIUS ABS TAKES MUCH LONGER TO RESUME BRAKING AFTER LOSING TRACTION OVER RAILROAD TRACKS OR OTHER BUMPS THAN DID MY THREE PREVIOUS ABS-EQUIPPED CARS (FROM 1987 AND 2001 WITH BOSCH ABS). CAR TRAVELS TENS OF FEET AT 30 MPH WITH NO APPARENT BRAKING BEFORE BRAKING RETURNS. DON'T BELIEVE REGENERATIVE BRAKING FORCES BAD ABS PERFO…

Read full complaint

2008 PRIUS ABS TAKES MUCH LONGER TO RESUME BRAKING AFTER LOSING TRACTION OVER RAILROAD TRACKS OR OTHER BUMPS THAN DID MY THREE PREVIOUS ABS-EQUIPPED CARS (FROM 1987 AND 2001 WITH BOSCH ABS). CAR TRAVELS TENS OF FEET AT 30 MPH WITH NO APPARENT BRAKING BEFORE BRAKING RETURNS. DON'T BELIEVE REGENERATIVE BRAKING FORCES BAD ABS PERFORMANCE -- THERE'S AN AMPLE SOURCE OF ACCUMULATED HIGH PRESSURE FLUID AVAILABLE FOR THE FRICTION BRAKES THAT IS QUITE INSTANTANEOUS IF EVER YOU STAMP ON THE PEDAL ENOUGH TO TRIGGER "BRAKE ASSIST". IF TOYOTA CAN'T MAKE REGEN COMPATIBLE WITH GOOD ABS, ASK THEM TO REVERT TO THE HYDRAULICS. PLEASE UPDATE FMVSS NO. 135 TO DISALLOW THIS KIND OF ABS PERFORMANCE. IT'S AN ONGOING PROBLEM. THERE IS NO SINGLE INCIDENT DATE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10305168

Mileage unknown · Feb 4, 2010
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

WHENEVER I DRIVE MY 2008 PRIUS OVER AN UNEVEN ROAD SURFACE, THE BRAKE ABS LIGHT GOES ON AND THE BRAKES APPEAR MOMENTARILY UNRESPONSIVE. THIS HAPPENS ON A REGULAR BASIS. IT HAS NOT CAUSED AN ACCIDENT, IN PART BECAUSE I AM A VERY CONSERVATIVE DRIVER. BUT, I WORRY THAT IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION I WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO STOP IN TIM…

Read full complaint

WHENEVER I DRIVE MY 2008 PRIUS OVER AN UNEVEN ROAD SURFACE, THE BRAKE ABS LIGHT GOES ON AND THE BRAKES APPEAR MOMENTARILY UNRESPONSIVE. THIS HAPPENS ON A REGULAR BASIS. IT HAS NOT CAUSED AN ACCIDENT, IN PART BECAUSE I AM A VERY CONSERVATIVE DRIVER. BUT, I WORRY THAT IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION I WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO STOP IN TIME. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10305163

13,000 miles · Feb 4, 2010
Service Brakes, HydraulicTraction Control System

WHEN GOING DOWNHILL AND APPROACHING A RIGHT TURN NEAR MY HOME I APPLY THE BRAKES AND OFTEN RUNOVER THE SAME UNEVEN SURFACE ON THE ROAD. THAT TRIGGERS MY 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS' TRACTION CONTROL LIGHT TO BLINK ON AND OFF A FEW TIMES AND MY BRAKES SEEM TO STOP APPLYING PRESSURE AT THAT POINT WHILE MY CAR'S SPEED INCREASES FOR 1-2 SECO…

Read full complaint

WHEN GOING DOWNHILL AND APPROACHING A RIGHT TURN NEAR MY HOME I APPLY THE BRAKES AND OFTEN RUNOVER THE SAME UNEVEN SURFACE ON THE ROAD. THAT TRIGGERS MY 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS' TRACTION CONTROL LIGHT TO BLINK ON AND OFF A FEW TIMES AND MY BRAKES SEEM TO STOP APPLYING PRESSURE AT THAT POINT WHILE MY CAR'S SPEED INCREASES FOR 1-2 SECONDS THEN THE TRACTION CONTROL LIGHT GOES OFF AND THE BRAKES WORK FINE. I AM JUST WORRIED ABOUT ALL THE ISSUES WITH TOYOTA CARS AND WANT TO MAKE SURE MY FAMILY IS SAFE. HENCE, TELLING MY SMALL STORY BEFORE IT HAPPENS AND I CAN'T CONTROL IT. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10305123

Official recalls

4

12V536000 · Engine And Engine Cooling; Hybrid Propulsion System: Inverter

Nov 14, 2012

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Hybrid Propulsion System: Inverter

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Engine And Engine Cooling

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

12V537000 · Steering; Steering:gear Box:shaft Sector

Nov 14, 2012

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Steering:gear Box:shaft Sector

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Steering

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

10V036000 · Equipment:other:labels

Feb 3, 2010

SOUTHEAST TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2005-2011 PASSENGER VEHICLES FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 110, "TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS." THESE VEHICLES WERE SOLD WITHOUT THE REQUISITE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY MODIFICATION LABELS.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A DRIVER MAY OVERLOAD A VEHICLE WHICH MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL MAIL TO CONSUMERS THE CORRECTED LABEL OR THE CUSTOMER WILL HAVE THE OPTION FOR DEALERS TO INSTALL THE LABEL FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 27, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT SOUTHEAST TOYOTA AT 1-800-301-6859.

09V388000 · Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

Oct 5, 2009

TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2004-2010 PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL CAN GET STUCK IN THE WIDE OPEN POSITION DUE TO ITS BEING TRAPPED BY AN UNSECURED OR INCOMPATIBLE DRIVER'S FLOOR MAT.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A STUCK OPEN ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY RESULT IN VERY HIGH VEHICLE SPEEDS AND MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO STOP THE VEHICLE, WHICH COULD CAUSE A CRASH, SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH.

Remedy: TOYOTA FILED AN AMENDED DEFECT REPORT ON NOVEMBER 25, 2009, STATING THAT DEALERS WILL MODIFY THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL AND, ON CERTAIN VEHICLES, ALTER THE SHAPE OF THE FLOOR SURFACE UNDER THE PEDAL. THESE CHANGES ADDRESS THE RISK OF PEDAL ENTRAPMENT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITH THE FLOOR MAT. REDESIGNED ACCELERATOR PEDALS WILL BECOME AVAILABLE BEGINNING IN APRIL 2010 AND DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY MODIFIED PEDAL WITH THE NEW PEDAL IF DESIRED. ALSO, DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY GENUINE TOYOTA OR LEXUS ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MATS WITH REDESIGNED ALL-WEATHER MATS, OR REPURCHASE THE PREVIOUS MATS FROM OWNERS WHO DO NOT WANT THE NEW ONES. ADDITIONALLY, SOFTWARE MODIFICATIONS WILL BE INSTALLED ON CAMRY, AVALON AND LEXUS ES 350, IS 350 AND IS 250 MODELS THAT WILL ENSURE THAT THE BRAKE OVERRIDES THE ACCELERATOR IN THE EVENT BOTH BRAKE AND ACCELERATOR PEDALS ARE APPLIED. TOYOTA WILL BEGIN MAILING LETTERS TO OWNERS ON DECEMBER 31, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TOYOTA AT 1-800-331-4331, LEXUS AT 1-800-255-3987.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

2

DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds

Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System

NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.

DP13001 · Intermediate Steering Shaft Separation

Opened Feb 21, 2013 · Closed Apr 8, 2020

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Steering; Steering:column; Steering:linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Additional source detail variants (3)

Steering:column

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Steering:linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Steering

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606