← New search

2008 Toyota Prius

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Prius years

Owner complaints for the 2008 Toyota Prius are substantially higher than the model-year median of 164.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

1,248 reports with mileage · 249 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Exterior Lighting. Review the 579 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 235 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 171 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

152 crash reports6 fire reports50 injury reports

Exterior Lighting complaints

579 reports
Clear category filter
44,270 miles · Apr 22, 2009
Exterior Lighting

I OWN A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS. I HAVE, WITHIN THE PAST TWO DAYS, EXPERIENCED THE FAILURE OF ONE OF THE HID HEADLIGHTS. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PRIUS HAS BEEN EXPERIENCING PREMATURE FAILURE OF THE HID LIGHTS. MY CAR IS JUST OVER A YEAR OLD WITH 44,000 MILES ON IT. I BELIEVE THE HEADLIGHTS GOING OUT, NOT STAYING ON, OR FA…

Read full complaint

I OWN A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS. I HAVE, WITHIN THE PAST TWO DAYS, EXPERIENCED THE FAILURE OF ONE OF THE HID HEADLIGHTS. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PRIUS HAS BEEN EXPERIENCING PREMATURE FAILURE OF THE HID LIGHTS. MY CAR IS JUST OVER A YEAR OLD WITH 44,000 MILES ON IT. I BELIEVE THE HEADLIGHTS GOING OUT, NOT STAYING ON, OR FAILING PREMATURELY IS CERTAINLY A SAFETY ISSUE. I DRIVE HOME FROM WORK EACH NIGHT IN THE DARK AND HAVE DECIDE THE PRIUS IS NOW A 'DAYTIME' ONLY VEHICLE SINCE IT CANNOT BE TRUSTED TO KEEP HEADLIGHTS ON A DARK, WOODED HIGHWAY AT NIGHT. THIS IS AN ACCIDENT WAITING TO HAPPEN. I BELIEVE IT IS TIME TO HAVE TOYOTA OWN UP TO THEIR PROBLEM WITH THE PREMATURE FAILURE OF THESE BULBS. HID ARE EXPECTED TO LAST SOMEWHERE IN THE VICINITY OF 3000-5000 HOURS, EVEN WITH MY HIGH MILEAGE, MY HID HAVE LESS THAN 1000 HOURS ON THEM. THERE IS OBVIOUSLY SOMETHING MORE TO THIS THAN JUST BULB FAILURE AND IT IS PLAINLY DANGEROUS AND SHOULD NOT WAIT FOR SOMEONE TO BE INJURED! *TR

NHTSA ODI #10266415

24,183 miles · Apr 9, 2009
Exterior Lighting

PREMATURE HEADLAMP FAILURE ON TOYOTA PRIUS AND EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE REPLACEMENT. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10264877

20,000 miles · Apr 8, 2009
Exterior Lighting

I HAVE A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS, PACKAGE 6 MODEL THAT I BOUGHT DECEMBER 27, 2008. THE CAR HAS ABOUT 23,000 MILES ON IT. BEGINNING IN MID-FEBRUARY 2009, THE LEFT HEADLAMP STARTED GOING ON AND OFF. ABOUT TWO WEEKS AGO, THE RIGHT HEADLAMP BEGAN DOING THE SAME THING. WHEN I START THE CAR, BOTH HEADLAMPS WILL BE ON AND ON MOST…

Read full complaint

I HAVE A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS, PACKAGE 6 MODEL THAT I BOUGHT DECEMBER 27, 2008. THE CAR HAS ABOUT 23,000 MILES ON IT. BEGINNING IN MID-FEBRUARY 2009, THE LEFT HEADLAMP STARTED GOING ON AND OFF. ABOUT TWO WEEKS AGO, THE RIGHT HEADLAMP BEGAN DOING THE SAME THING. WHEN I START THE CAR, BOTH HEADLAMPS WILL BE ON AND ON MOST DRIVES, ONE OF THE HEADLAMPS WILL GO OUT. IF I TURN THE LIGHTS OFF AND THEN BACK ON, THE HEADLAMP WILL USUALLY COME BACK ON FOR A BIT (THOUGH SOMETIMES IT LOOKS VERY WEAK) BEFORE GOING OUT AGAIN. SOMETIMES THE HEADLAMP WILL COME BACK ON BY ITSELF WHEN I AM DRIVING. ON SOME DRIVES (USUALLY SHORT ONES) NEITHER HEADLAMP WILL GO OUT. THE LEFT (DRIVER SIDE) HEADLAMP DOES THIS MUCH MORE FREQUENTLY THAN THE RIGHT. I'M CONCERNED ABOUT BEING STOPPED FOR HAVING A HEADLIGHT OUT AND THAT BOTH LIGHTS MAY GO OUT AT THE SAME TIME (THEY HAVEN'T YET). SINCE THE HEADLAMP KEEPS COMING BACK ON, I DON'T THINK THAT REPLACING IT WILL FIX THIS ISSUE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10264469

39,500 miles · Mar 31, 2009
Exterior Lighting

RECURRING HID HEADLIGHT /COMPUTER FAILURE ON 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS. MY HID HEADLIGHT/COMPUTER HAS FAILED ON MY 2008 PRIUS COSTING $600 TO REPLACE. I FREQUENTLY ENCOUNTER OTHER PRIUS VEHICLES ON THE ROAD WITH ONE HEADLIGHT OUT WHICH LEADS ME TO BELIEVE THERE IS A MANUFACTURING DEFECT IN THE COMPUTER. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10263800

38,000 miles · Mar 30, 2009
Exterior Lighting

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE HEADLIGHTS WORKED INTERMITTENTLY. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE WARRANTY WOULD NOT COVER THE REPAIRS FOR THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE LESS THAN 38,000.

NHTSA ODI #10263645

40,600 miles · Mar 19, 2009
Exterior Lighting

I OWN A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS, PACKAGE 6, WITH 40600 MILES ON IT. THE HID HEADLIGHTS STARTED TO GO OUT WHILE DRIVING. IT STARTED WITH THE DRIVERS SIDE, THEN THE PASSENGER SIDE LIGHT WAS AFFECTED. I COULD TURN THE LIGHTS OFF THEN BACK ON AND THEY WOULD WORK AGAIN FOR A PERIOD OF TIME. TWICE, WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT THEY BOTH WENT …

Read full complaint

I OWN A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS, PACKAGE 6, WITH 40600 MILES ON IT. THE HID HEADLIGHTS STARTED TO GO OUT WHILE DRIVING. IT STARTED WITH THE DRIVERS SIDE, THEN THE PASSENGER SIDE LIGHT WAS AFFECTED. I COULD TURN THE LIGHTS OFF THEN BACK ON AND THEY WOULD WORK AGAIN FOR A PERIOD OF TIME. TWICE, WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT THEY BOTH WENT OUT. LUCKILY I WAS ABLE TO TURN THEM OFF AND BACK ON AND IT STAYED ON. THIS PROBLEM SHOULDN'T OCCUR ON A NEW VEHICLE WITH 40K MILES. I WAS CITED BY A POLICE OFFICER ON 18MAR09 FOR DRIVING WITH 1 OPERATING HEADLIGHT. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10262439

41,000 miles · Mar 12, 2009
Exterior Lighting

2008 PRIUS WITH HID HEADLIGHTS. BOTH INTERMITTENTLY FAIL. CAN BE CORRECTED BY SWITCHING LIGHTS OFF/ON. SAFETY ISSUE BECAUSE NEVER CAN TELL WHEN THEY WILL FAIL. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10261603

31,330 miles · Mar 10, 2009
Exterior Lighting

2008 TOYOTA PRIUS BOTH HEADLIGHTS WENT OUT THIS MORNING AND I WAS ABLE TO GET THEM TO COME BACK ON FOR ABOUT 5 MINUTES TOTAL WHILE DRIVING TO WORK. I DRIVE 70 MILES ON FREEWAY EACH WAY IN THE DARK. DRIVER SIDE BRIGHT LIGHT WOULD COME ON BRIEFLY THEN GO OUT AGAIN. PASSENGER SIDE BRIGHT LIGHT DID NOT. I DROVE TO WORK WITH THE…

Read full complaint

2008 TOYOTA PRIUS BOTH HEADLIGHTS WENT OUT THIS MORNING AND I WAS ABLE TO GET THEM TO COME BACK ON FOR ABOUT 5 MINUTES TOTAL WHILE DRIVING TO WORK. I DRIVE 70 MILES ON FREEWAY EACH WAY IN THE DARK. DRIVER SIDE BRIGHT LIGHT WOULD COME ON BRIEFLY THEN GO OUT AGAIN. PASSENGER SIDE BRIGHT LIGHT DID NOT. I DROVE TO WORK WITH THE FOG LIGHTS ON ONLY. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10261403

60,000 miles · Feb 24, 2009
Exterior Lighting

2008 TOYOTA PRIUS HID BULBS HAVE FAILED INTERMITTENT TAKE IT TO THE DEALER AND THEY REPLACED THE ECU FOR THE HID'S 2X BUT WILL NOT WARRANTY BULB, THEY WANT $349.99 FOR BULB AND 1 HR LABOR THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE AS BOTH CAN GO OFF TOGETHER IF I TURN HEADLIGHTS ON THEN OFF THEY WORK I HAVE BEEN GIVEN WARNINGS BY THE POLICE 3X ALRE…

Read full complaint

2008 TOYOTA PRIUS HID BULBS HAVE FAILED INTERMITTENT TAKE IT TO THE DEALER AND THEY REPLACED THE ECU FOR THE HID'S 2X BUT WILL NOT WARRANTY BULB, THEY WANT $349.99 FOR BULB AND 1 HR LABOR THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE AS BOTH CAN GO OFF TOGETHER IF I TURN HEADLIGHTS ON THEN OFF THEY WORK I HAVE BEEN GIVEN WARNINGS BY THE POLICE 3X ALREADY AND TRY TO EXPLAIN SO BACK TO THE DEALER FOR THE SAME RUN AROUND I PURCHASED 2 BULBS FROM MY LOCAL PARTS STORE FOR A FRACTION AT $149EA BUT STILL THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS...NHTSA SHOULD FORCE TOYOTA INTO A SAFETY RECALL WHICH THIS IS ONE. YOU NEED LIGHTS TO DRIVE AT NIGHT? I DO THINK SO. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10259825

20,000 miles · Jan 15, 2009
Exterior Lighting

HAVE A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS. HEADLIGHTS OPERATE INTERMITTENTLY. I UNDERSTAND THIS HAS BEEN A PROBLEM WITH PRIUS FOR A FEW YEARS AND HAS BILKED ALOT OF MONEY FROM OWNERS UNFAIRLY. WHO IS OUR ADVOCATE. EXORBITANT PRICES ARE BEING CHARGED FOR PARTS AND LABOR. PLEASE HELP US. THANK YOU. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10255157

Official recalls

4

12V536000 · Engine And Engine Cooling; Hybrid Propulsion System: Inverter

Nov 14, 2012

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Hybrid Propulsion System: Inverter

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Engine And Engine Cooling

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

12V537000 · Steering; Steering:gear Box:shaft Sector

Nov 14, 2012

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Steering:gear Box:shaft Sector

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Steering

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

10V036000 · Equipment:other:labels

Feb 3, 2010

SOUTHEAST TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2005-2011 PASSENGER VEHICLES FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 110, "TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS." THESE VEHICLES WERE SOLD WITHOUT THE REQUISITE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY MODIFICATION LABELS.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A DRIVER MAY OVERLOAD A VEHICLE WHICH MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL MAIL TO CONSUMERS THE CORRECTED LABEL OR THE CUSTOMER WILL HAVE THE OPTION FOR DEALERS TO INSTALL THE LABEL FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 27, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT SOUTHEAST TOYOTA AT 1-800-301-6859.

09V388000 · Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

Oct 5, 2009

TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2004-2010 PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL CAN GET STUCK IN THE WIDE OPEN POSITION DUE TO ITS BEING TRAPPED BY AN UNSECURED OR INCOMPATIBLE DRIVER'S FLOOR MAT.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A STUCK OPEN ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY RESULT IN VERY HIGH VEHICLE SPEEDS AND MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO STOP THE VEHICLE, WHICH COULD CAUSE A CRASH, SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH.

Remedy: TOYOTA FILED AN AMENDED DEFECT REPORT ON NOVEMBER 25, 2009, STATING THAT DEALERS WILL MODIFY THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL AND, ON CERTAIN VEHICLES, ALTER THE SHAPE OF THE FLOOR SURFACE UNDER THE PEDAL. THESE CHANGES ADDRESS THE RISK OF PEDAL ENTRAPMENT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITH THE FLOOR MAT. REDESIGNED ACCELERATOR PEDALS WILL BECOME AVAILABLE BEGINNING IN APRIL 2010 AND DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY MODIFIED PEDAL WITH THE NEW PEDAL IF DESIRED. ALSO, DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY GENUINE TOYOTA OR LEXUS ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MATS WITH REDESIGNED ALL-WEATHER MATS, OR REPURCHASE THE PREVIOUS MATS FROM OWNERS WHO DO NOT WANT THE NEW ONES. ADDITIONALLY, SOFTWARE MODIFICATIONS WILL BE INSTALLED ON CAMRY, AVALON AND LEXUS ES 350, IS 350 AND IS 250 MODELS THAT WILL ENSURE THAT THE BRAKE OVERRIDES THE ACCELERATOR IN THE EVENT BOTH BRAKE AND ACCELERATOR PEDALS ARE APPLIED. TOYOTA WILL BEGIN MAILING LETTERS TO OWNERS ON DECEMBER 31, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TOYOTA AT 1-800-331-4331, LEXUS AT 1-800-255-3987.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

2

DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds

Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System

NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.

DP13001 · Intermediate Steering Shaft Separation

Opened Feb 21, 2013 · Closed Apr 8, 2020

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Steering; Steering:column; Steering:linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Additional source detail variants (3)

Steering:column

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Steering:linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Steering

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606