← New search

2008 Toyota Prius

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Prius years

Owner complaints for the 2008 Toyota Prius are substantially higher than the model-year median of 164.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

1,248 reports with mileage · 249 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Exterior Lighting. Review the 579 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 235 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 171 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

152 crash reports6 fire reports50 injury reports

Exterior Lighting complaints

579 reports
Clear category filter
41,500 miles · Oct 21, 2009
Exterior Lighting

THE HID BULB ON THE PASSENGER SIDE OF MY 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS WITH ONLY 40K MILES ON IT, GOES OUT INTERMITTENTLY. IF I TURN MY SWITCH OFF AND THEN BACK ON, THE BULB WILL COME BACK ON, FOR A LITTLE WHILE. THE DEALERSHIP WANTS $300 TO REPLACE THE BULB. THE HAZARD OF POSSIBLY LOSING THE DRIVER SIDE LIGHT BEFORE I CAN GET THE PASSEN…

Read full complaint

THE HID BULB ON THE PASSENGER SIDE OF MY 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS WITH ONLY 40K MILES ON IT, GOES OUT INTERMITTENTLY. IF I TURN MY SWITCH OFF AND THEN BACK ON, THE BULB WILL COME BACK ON, FOR A LITTLE WHILE. THE DEALERSHIP WANTS $300 TO REPLACE THE BULB. THE HAZARD OF POSSIBLY LOSING THE DRIVER SIDE LIGHT BEFORE I CAN GET THE PASSENGER SIDE REPAIRED IS OF GREAT CONCERN. THIS IS A CONTINUING, CONSTANT PROBLEM. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10289272

37,000 miles · Oct 19, 2009
Exterior Lighting

I WORK IN THE FIELD OF LAW ENFORCEMENT. I GOT OFF DUTY AND WAS GETTING READY TO LEAVE WHEN ANOTHER OFFICER NOTIFIED ME THAT MY DRIVERS SIDE HEADLAMP WAS NOT OPERABLE. AS A PEACE OFFICER I CAN TESTIFY THAT I'VE HAD NUMEROUS CONTACTS WITH THE OWNERS OF LATE MODEL PRIUS' PERTAINING TO HEADLAMPS AND TAIL LAMPS BEING INOPERABLE. THIS…

Read full complaint

I WORK IN THE FIELD OF LAW ENFORCEMENT. I GOT OFF DUTY AND WAS GETTING READY TO LEAVE WHEN ANOTHER OFFICER NOTIFIED ME THAT MY DRIVERS SIDE HEADLAMP WAS NOT OPERABLE. AS A PEACE OFFICER I CAN TESTIFY THAT I'VE HAD NUMEROUS CONTACTS WITH THE OWNERS OF LATE MODEL PRIUS' PERTAINING TO HEADLAMPS AND TAIL LAMPS BEING INOPERABLE. THIS IS A SERIOUS SAFETY ISSUE AND TOYOTA NEEDS TO RECALL THE VEHICLES AND MAKE THE NECESSARY REPAIRS. I CAN SAY THAT THE LOCAL TOYOTA DEALER FIXED THE ISSUE IMMEDIATELY WHEN I TOOK IT IN FOR REPAIRS. I TOLD THEM I WAS NOT GOING TO PAY THE $300.00 PLUS TO FIX THE ISSUE CONSIDERING IT'S A COMMON PROBLEM WITH THE LATE MODEL VEHICLES. THE DEALER IS VERY REPUTABLE AND FIXED THE VEHICLE WITHOUT CHARGE. NOW I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THE OTHER HEAD LAMP AND HAVING IT REPLACED BEFORE IT GOES OUT. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10289037

38,000 miles · Oct 17, 2009
Exterior Lighting

THE HD HEADLIGHTS ON MY 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS GO OFF AT TIMES. LAST NIGHT I WAS DRIVING AND BOTH HEADLIGHTS WENT OFF, I TRIED THE BRIGHTS BUT THEY DIDN'T WORK EITHER. I PULLED OVER TO A GAS STATION AND TURNED OF THE CAR AND RESTARTED IT. THIS TIME ONLY ONE LIGHT CAME ON AND THE BRIGHTS WORKED ONLY ON ONE SIDE. THIS HAPPENED IN…

Read full complaint

THE HD HEADLIGHTS ON MY 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS GO OFF AT TIMES. LAST NIGHT I WAS DRIVING AND BOTH HEADLIGHTS WENT OFF, I TRIED THE BRIGHTS BUT THEY DIDN'T WORK EITHER. I PULLED OVER TO A GAS STATION AND TURNED OF THE CAR AND RESTARTED IT. THIS TIME ONLY ONE LIGHT CAME ON AND THE BRIGHTS WORKED ONLY ON ONE SIDE. THIS HAPPENED IN AUGUST TOO BUT THEN THE LIGHTS CAME ON AGAIN AND THERE WASN'T A PROBLEM. HOWEVER IN THE PAST 3 DAYS THE PROBLEM HAS RESURFACED. THE BULBS ARE NOT BURNT. I LIVE IN THE MOUNTAINS SO IT WAS VERY SCARY WHEN THE LIGHTS SUDDENLY WENT OFF ON THE WINDING MOUNTAIN ROAD. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10288785

24,000 miles · Oct 9, 2009
Exterior Lighting

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS. WHILE DRIVING 45 MPH AT NIGHT THE DRIVER-SIDE HEADLIGHT FAILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER, AND THE HEADLIGHTS' COMPUTER CHIP WAS REPLACED. AFTER THE REPAIR BOTH EXTERIOR HEAD LAMPS FAILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN BACK TO THE DEALER AND BOTH COMPUTER CHIPS WERE REPLACED. THE …

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS. WHILE DRIVING 45 MPH AT NIGHT THE DRIVER-SIDE HEADLIGHT FAILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER, AND THE HEADLIGHTS' COMPUTER CHIP WAS REPLACED. AFTER THE REPAIR BOTH EXTERIOR HEAD LAMPS FAILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN BACK TO THE DEALER AND BOTH COMPUTER CHIPS WERE REPLACED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 24,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 25,000. THE VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER WAS UNAVAILBLE. UPDATED 10/29/09. *LJ BOTH HEADLIGHTS FAILED AND WERE REPLACED. UPDATED 10/29/09*JB

NHTSA ODI #10286909

36,600 miles · Oct 8, 2009
Exterior Lighting

I HAVE A HID HEADLIGHT ON A 2008 PRIUS THAT APPEARS TO FLICKER AND THEN GOES OUT. THE PROBLEM SEEMS TO BE INTERMITTENT AND WAS BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION BY A POLICEMAN. WHEN I START THE CAR AT HOME THE HEADLIGHT COMES ON BRIGHTLY. A FEW MILES DOWN THE ROAD THE PROBLEM STARTS. REPAIR COST IS VERY EXPENSIVE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10286796

Mileage unknown · Oct 7, 2009
Exterior Lighting

I HAVE A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS WITH HIGH INTENSITY DISCHARGE HEADLAMPS, AND MORE OFTEN THAN NOT THEY BOTH GO OUT RANDOMLY, I HAVE TO TURN THEM OFF THEN ON AGAIN TO GET THEM TO WORK AS MANY AS 5 TIMES AN HOUR OF DRIVING (COMMUTER), THIS PROBLEM REALLY STARTED TO BE AN ISSUE BACK IN MARCH WHEN THE LEFT HEADLAMP CONSISTENTLY KEPT GOING…

Read full complaint

I HAVE A 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS WITH HIGH INTENSITY DISCHARGE HEADLAMPS, AND MORE OFTEN THAN NOT THEY BOTH GO OUT RANDOMLY, I HAVE TO TURN THEM OFF THEN ON AGAIN TO GET THEM TO WORK AS MANY AS 5 TIMES AN HOUR OF DRIVING (COMMUTER), THIS PROBLEM REALLY STARTED TO BE AN ISSUE BACK IN MARCH WHEN THE LEFT HEADLAMP CONSISTENTLY KEPT GOING OUT. NOW I BROUGHT IT IN FOR SERVICE AND TOYOTA WILL COVER IT THIS TIME BUT ALTHOUGH MY CAR IS 1 YEAR AND 11 MONTHS OLD I HAVE ALMOST REACHED THE 36,000 MILE LIMITATION. AFTER WHICH THIS REPAIR WILL COST ME APPROXIMATELY $1000.00. I DO HAVE TOYOTA EXTRA CARE WARRANTY FOR 8 YEARS OR 125,000 MILES AND THE WILL NOT COVER SUCH ISSUES EVEN IF THEY ARE DUE TO DEFECTS. I AM CONCERNED THAT IF THIS BECOMES A CONSISTENT PROBLEM IT MAY CAUSE AN ACCIDENT. I COMMUTE DAILY APPROXIMATELY 50 MILES AND I ALWAYS RETURN FROM WORK AT NIGHT. I WILL GET THE OLD SET OF LAMPS BACK FROM THE DEALER FOR ANALYSIS IF NEEDED. I REALLY THINK THAT THIS CONCERN SHOULD BE OF UTMOST IMPORTANCE BECAUSE IT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO CAUSE SERIOUS INJURY IF IT IS NOT CORRECTED. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10286686

30,000 miles · Oct 5, 2009
Exterior Lighting

SAFETY ISSUES WITH TOYOTA 2008 PRIUS HEADLIGHT SYSTEM. AFTER LIVING WITH POOR HEADLIGHT ILLUMINATION AND OTHER HEADLIGHT ISSUES FOR ABOUT 19 MONTHS, I AM REGISTERING WHAT I CONSIDER TO BE SIGNIFICANT SAFETY ISSUES. HEADLIGHTS: 1. NOT BRIGHT ENOUGH. 2. CANNOT BE AIMED TO GIVE DISTANCE ILLUMINATION 3. BLINK OFF DRIVING AT NI…

Read full complaint

SAFETY ISSUES WITH TOYOTA 2008 PRIUS HEADLIGHT SYSTEM. AFTER LIVING WITH POOR HEADLIGHT ILLUMINATION AND OTHER HEADLIGHT ISSUES FOR ABOUT 19 MONTHS, I AM REGISTERING WHAT I CONSIDER TO BE SIGNIFICANT SAFETY ISSUES. HEADLIGHTS: 1. NOT BRIGHT ENOUGH. 2. CANNOT BE AIMED TO GIVE DISTANCE ILLUMINATION 3. BLINK OFF DRIVING AT NIGHT I HAVE MADE NUMEROUS, MOSTLY UNRESOLVED, TRIPS TO THE DEALER WHERE WE BOUGHT THE CAR NEW. 1. IT TOOK TWO TRIPS TO THE DEALER, TO RESOLVE PROBLEMS WITH THE AUTOMATIC SYSTEM FOR RAISING AND LOWERING THE HEADLIGHTS. I WAS TOLD THE ASSEMBLY HAS NO SHIELDING OR SEALS TO PROTECT IT FROM PHYSICAL OR CORROSION DAMAGE 2. AFTER ALIGNMENT ADJUSTMENTS, THE HEADLIGHTS CONTINUED TO BE AIMED TOO LOW. WITH LOW BEAM THEY ARE SO LOW THAT A PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE, ANIMAL, MORE THAN ABOUT 30 FEET AWAY IS VERY DIFFICULT TO SEE AT NIGHT. THE HIGH BEAM SETTING IS SOMEWHAT BETTER. WE HAVE HAD SEVERAL CLOSE ENCOUNTERS WITH DEER STANDING ON THE ROAD AND SEEING THEM BARELY IN TIME TO AVOID THEM. ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS I HAVE NOT SEEN BICYCLES OR PEOPLE WALKING ON THE EDGE OF THE ROAD IN THE DARK AGAIN, AVOIDING THEM AT THE LAST SECOND. THE HIGH BEAM THE HEADLIGHTS ARE NOT BRIGHT ENOUGH TO CAUSE ANYONE TO FLASH BACK AT ME WHEN THEY APPROACH FROM THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION. I HAVE THE (EXPENSIVE) HIGH INTENSITY LIGHTS. THEY HAVE INVESTIGATED AUXILIARY HEADLIGHTS FOR ME BUT HAVE NOTHING TO OFFER, SUGGESTING I GO TO AN AFTERMARKET PERSON TO INSTALL ADDITIONAL LIGHTS. (I AM RELUCTANT TO DO THIS, FOR REASONS OF COMPLEXITY, AND POTENTIAL LEGALITY.) 3. I HAVE MADE THREE ADDITIONAL ROUND TRIPS TO THE DEALER FOR THE PROBLEM OF HEADLIGHTS (HIGH AND/OR LOW BEAM) THAT TURN OFF FOR NO REASON AFTER DRIVING A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME. LUCKILY IT IS JUST ONE'.USUALLY BUT NOT ALWAYS THE RIGHT SIDE. ONE 'COMPUTER' HAS BEEN REPLACED. THE DEALER'S SERVICE SHOP PERSONNEL INDICATE ALL THESE ARE PROBLEMS THEY HAVE SEEN PREVIOUSLY AND ARE CHARACTERISTIC OF THE CAR. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10286388

44,000 miles · Oct 2, 2009
Exterior Lighting

TOYOTA 2008 PRIUS HID HEADLIGHTS RANDOMLY TURN OFF (ONE AT A TIME, USUALLY NOT TOGETHER) WHILE DRIVING AT DAWN, NIGHT OR DUSK. NO REPAIRS DONE AT THIS TIME UNTIL TOYOTA OR THE VENDOR WHO SUPPLIES TOYOTA HID HEADLIGHTS, COMPUTER CHIP, ELECTRONICS, SOFTWARE, SENSORS, ETC. EVALUATE WHY THIS IS HAPPENING. THE WORKAROUND IS DRIVE T…

Read full complaint

TOYOTA 2008 PRIUS HID HEADLIGHTS RANDOMLY TURN OFF (ONE AT A TIME, USUALLY NOT TOGETHER) WHILE DRIVING AT DAWN, NIGHT OR DUSK. NO REPAIRS DONE AT THIS TIME UNTIL TOYOTA OR THE VENDOR WHO SUPPLIES TOYOTA HID HEADLIGHTS, COMPUTER CHIP, ELECTRONICS, SOFTWARE, SENSORS, ETC. EVALUATE WHY THIS IS HAPPENING. THE WORKAROUND IS DRIVE TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD AND STOP, AND TO UNSAFELY TURN THE LIGHT SWITCH OFF, THEN BACK ON. IT IS UNFAIR TO THE CONSUMERS TO PAY FOR REPLACEMENT COMPONENTS, LABOR WHEN THE MANUFACTURER(S) DOES NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THIS IS HAPPENING (BASED ON TALKING TO SERVICE REP IN JULY 2009, NO SERVICE BULLETINS FROM TOYOTA, AT AIRPORT TOYOTA IN VANDALIA, OH). *TR

NHTSA ODI #10286116

39,400 miles · Sep 30, 2009
Exterior Lighting

PASSENGER-SIDE HID HEADLAMP FAILED ON MY 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS AT ~36,400 MILEAGE. TOOK IT TO DEALER 2 DAYS LATER AND THEY SAID PROBLEM COULD BE LAMP OR COMPUTER AND THAT BOTH WERE EXPENSIVE ($300), BUT SINCE LAMP WAS ON THEY COULD NOT INVESTIGATE THE PROBLEM. I TOOK CAR BACK AND ONCE AGAIN LIGHT DIMMED THEN FLICKERED OFF WHILE …

Read full complaint

PASSENGER-SIDE HID HEADLAMP FAILED ON MY 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS AT ~36,400 MILEAGE. TOOK IT TO DEALER 2 DAYS LATER AND THEY SAID PROBLEM COULD BE LAMP OR COMPUTER AND THAT BOTH WERE EXPENSIVE ($300), BUT SINCE LAMP WAS ON THEY COULD NOT INVESTIGATE THE PROBLEM. I TOOK CAR BACK AND ONCE AGAIN LIGHT DIMMED THEN FLICKERED OFF WHILE DRIVING. I DID SOME READING AND FOUND THAT THIS HID FAILURE IS A WELL-KNOWN DEFECT ON SECOND GENERATION PRIUS. CURRENT MILEAGE IS 36,900 SO NOT UNDER WARRANTY. PLACED CALL TO MANUFACTURER TO FIND OUT IF THERE IS ANY REMEDY FOR THIS DEFECT AND THEY WILL GET BACK TO ME W/IN 24 HOURS. I WILL HAVE TO GET A REPLACEMENT SINCE IT IS UNSAFE TO DRIVE AT NIGHT IN SEMI-RURAL AREA WITH ON-AGAIN/OFF-AGAIN HEADLIGHTS. THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE AND I HOPE WE DON'T HAVE TO WAIT FOR A FATALITY, LIKE WITH THE FLOORMATS, TO GET SOME ACTION. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10285845

39,000 miles · Sep 30, 2009
Exterior Lighting

I HAVE A 2008 PRIUS WITH ABOUT 40,000 MILES ON IT, THE HEADLAMPS ARE TURNING OFF RANDOMLY. I QUICKLY FLIP THE SWITCH OFF, THEN BACK ON AND THEY REMAIN ON FOR ABOUT 2 MINUTES, THEN FAIL AGAIN. VERY DANGEROUS WHEN ON COUNTRY ROADS. I KEEP THE FOG LIGHTS ON AS BACK UP. JUST GOT BACK FROM DEALER AND THEY TOLD ME $400 TO REPLACE.…

Read full complaint

I HAVE A 2008 PRIUS WITH ABOUT 40,000 MILES ON IT, THE HEADLAMPS ARE TURNING OFF RANDOMLY. I QUICKLY FLIP THE SWITCH OFF, THEN BACK ON AND THEY REMAIN ON FOR ABOUT 2 MINUTES, THEN FAIL AGAIN. VERY DANGEROUS WHEN ON COUNTRY ROADS. I KEEP THE FOG LIGHTS ON AS BACK UP. JUST GOT BACK FROM DEALER AND THEY TOLD ME $400 TO REPLACE. OUCH! I DECIDED TO TAKE THE RISK AND KEEP ON DRIVING DUE TO THE EXTREMELY HIGH COST AND NO DECENT GUARANTEE AFTER THE INSTALL. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10285811

Official recalls

4

12V536000 · Engine And Engine Cooling; Hybrid Propulsion System: Inverter

Nov 14, 2012

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Hybrid Propulsion System: Inverter

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Engine And Engine Cooling

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

12V537000 · Steering; Steering:gear Box:shaft Sector

Nov 14, 2012

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Steering:gear Box:shaft Sector

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Steering

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

10V036000 · Equipment:other:labels

Feb 3, 2010

SOUTHEAST TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2005-2011 PASSENGER VEHICLES FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 110, "TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS." THESE VEHICLES WERE SOLD WITHOUT THE REQUISITE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY MODIFICATION LABELS.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A DRIVER MAY OVERLOAD A VEHICLE WHICH MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL MAIL TO CONSUMERS THE CORRECTED LABEL OR THE CUSTOMER WILL HAVE THE OPTION FOR DEALERS TO INSTALL THE LABEL FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 27, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT SOUTHEAST TOYOTA AT 1-800-301-6859.

09V388000 · Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

Oct 5, 2009

TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2004-2010 PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL CAN GET STUCK IN THE WIDE OPEN POSITION DUE TO ITS BEING TRAPPED BY AN UNSECURED OR INCOMPATIBLE DRIVER'S FLOOR MAT.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A STUCK OPEN ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY RESULT IN VERY HIGH VEHICLE SPEEDS AND MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO STOP THE VEHICLE, WHICH COULD CAUSE A CRASH, SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH.

Remedy: TOYOTA FILED AN AMENDED DEFECT REPORT ON NOVEMBER 25, 2009, STATING THAT DEALERS WILL MODIFY THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL AND, ON CERTAIN VEHICLES, ALTER THE SHAPE OF THE FLOOR SURFACE UNDER THE PEDAL. THESE CHANGES ADDRESS THE RISK OF PEDAL ENTRAPMENT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITH THE FLOOR MAT. REDESIGNED ACCELERATOR PEDALS WILL BECOME AVAILABLE BEGINNING IN APRIL 2010 AND DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY MODIFIED PEDAL WITH THE NEW PEDAL IF DESIRED. ALSO, DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY GENUINE TOYOTA OR LEXUS ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MATS WITH REDESIGNED ALL-WEATHER MATS, OR REPURCHASE THE PREVIOUS MATS FROM OWNERS WHO DO NOT WANT THE NEW ONES. ADDITIONALLY, SOFTWARE MODIFICATIONS WILL BE INSTALLED ON CAMRY, AVALON AND LEXUS ES 350, IS 350 AND IS 250 MODELS THAT WILL ENSURE THAT THE BRAKE OVERRIDES THE ACCELERATOR IN THE EVENT BOTH BRAKE AND ACCELERATOR PEDALS ARE APPLIED. TOYOTA WILL BEGIN MAILING LETTERS TO OWNERS ON DECEMBER 31, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TOYOTA AT 1-800-331-4331, LEXUS AT 1-800-255-3987.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

2

DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds

Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System

NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.

DP13001 · Intermediate Steering Shaft Separation

Opened Feb 21, 2013 · Closed Apr 8, 2020

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Steering; Steering:column; Steering:linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Additional source detail variants (3)

Steering:column

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Steering:linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Steering

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606