← New search

2008 Toyota Prius

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Prius years

Owner complaints for the 2008 Toyota Prius are substantially higher than the model-year median of 164.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

1,248 reports with mileage · 249 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Exterior Lighting. Review the 579 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 235 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 171 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

152 crash reports6 fire reports50 injury reports

Exterior Lighting complaints

579 reports
Clear category filter
36,900 miles · Mar 13, 2010
Exterior Lighting

2008 TOYOTA PRIUS HID HEADLAMP HAS GONE OUT ON THE DRIVERS SIDE...DEALERSHIP IN ASHEVILLE ONLY SAYS ITS PAST THE 36,000 MILES AND OUT OF WARRANTY. GOING TO HAVE THE DEALERSHIP CHECK OUT THE LIGHT AND WHAT IS WRONG. SAW ALL THE COMPLAINTS WITH OTHER OWNERS AND THIS IS A PROBLEM, AND A SAFETY ISSUE. THERE SHOULD BE A RECALL ON …

Read full complaint

2008 TOYOTA PRIUS HID HEADLAMP HAS GONE OUT ON THE DRIVERS SIDE...DEALERSHIP IN ASHEVILLE ONLY SAYS ITS PAST THE 36,000 MILES AND OUT OF WARRANTY. GOING TO HAVE THE DEALERSHIP CHECK OUT THE LIGHT AND WHAT IS WRONG. SAW ALL THE COMPLAINTS WITH OTHER OWNERS AND THIS IS A PROBLEM, AND A SAFETY ISSUE. THERE SHOULD BE A RECALL ON THIS OR A LEMON LAW PUT ON IT SO TOYOTA WILL HANDLE THE COSTS. I AM JUST WONDERING HOW MUCH IT WILL COST. THE LIGHT ALONE IS ABOUT $150.00 EACH. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10319454

49,878 miles · Mar 10, 2010
Exterior Lighting

PREMATURE FAILURE OF HID LIGHT BULB ON 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS WITH 49,000 MILES ON IT . THEN BEING TOLD BY THE DEALER IT WILL COST 250.00 TO REPLACE IT.I UNDERSTAND THIS A REALLY COMMON FAILURE ON PRIUS WITH HID LIGHT BULBS AND IT HAPPENS ALOT.. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10318767

43,000 miles · Mar 9, 2010
Exterior Lighting

BOTH HEADLIGHTS WENT OUT PERIODICALLY WITHOUT WARNING MAKING IT UNSAFE TO DRIVE AT NIGHT. THEN NOTICED THE DRIVERS SIDE WENT OUT PERIODICALLY AND HAD TO FLIP THE SWITCH FOR LIGHT TO GO BACK ON. THIS HAPPENED FOR MONTH OR SO. THEN IT COMPLETELY WENT OUT. THEN ABOUT MONTH LATER - THE PASSENGER LIGHT WOULD GO OUT WITHOUT WARNIN…

Read full complaint

BOTH HEADLIGHTS WENT OUT PERIODICALLY WITHOUT WARNING MAKING IT UNSAFE TO DRIVE AT NIGHT. THEN NOTICED THE DRIVERS SIDE WENT OUT PERIODICALLY AND HAD TO FLIP THE SWITCH FOR LIGHT TO GO BACK ON. THIS HAPPENED FOR MONTH OR SO. THEN IT COMPLETELY WENT OUT. THEN ABOUT MONTH LATER - THE PASSENGER LIGHT WOULD GO OUT WITHOUT WARNING LEAVING ME WITH NO LIGHTS WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT. BY FLIPPING THE SWITCH, THE LIGHT WOULD GO BACK ON FOR FEW MINUTES AND THEN AGAIN SHUT OFF. CAR IS A 2008 PRIUS. THIS SHOULD NOT HAPPEN TO A BARELY 2 YEAR OLD CAR. THERE SEEMS TO BE SOME SORT OF MALFUNCTION WITH THE WIRING, ETC BECAUSE THE LIGHTS SHOULD NOT BE GOING OUT SO SOON... *TR

NHTSA ODI #10318204

44,000 miles · Mar 9, 2010
Electrical SystemExterior Lighting

I PURCHASED A 2008 PRIUS WITH HID BULBS AND THEY BOTH STARTED GOING OUT A COUPLE WEEKS AFTER OWNING IT WHILE I WAS DRIVING HOME AT NIGHT. IN JUST A MATTER OF MINUTES, I HAD NO LIGHTS AT ALL! I WAS IN A URBAN AREA, SO THE STREET LIGHTS WERE THERE SO THAT I COULD SEE. BUT IF I WERE IN THE COUNTRY, AS I USUALLY AM ABOUT ONCE A …

Read full complaint

I PURCHASED A 2008 PRIUS WITH HID BULBS AND THEY BOTH STARTED GOING OUT A COUPLE WEEKS AFTER OWNING IT WHILE I WAS DRIVING HOME AT NIGHT. IN JUST A MATTER OF MINUTES, I HAD NO LIGHTS AT ALL! I WAS IN A URBAN AREA, SO THE STREET LIGHTS WERE THERE SO THAT I COULD SEE. BUT IF I WERE IN THE COUNTRY, AS I USUALLY AM ABOUT ONCE A WEEK, I WOULD HAVE BEEN IN BIG TROUBLE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10318140

25,000 miles · Mar 8, 2010
Exterior Lighting

THE DRIVER'S SIDE HID HEADLAMP INTERMITTENTLY FAILS WHILE THE CAR IS IN OPERATION. I HAVE BROUGHT THIS TO THE TOYOTA DEALERS SEVERAL TIMES, ONLY TO BE TOLD THE PROBLEM CANNOT BE RECREATED. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10317822

49,000 miles · Mar 7, 2010
Exterior Lighting

HEADLIGHTS OFTEN GO OUT. IF I STOP AND MANIPULATE THE CONNECTION, IT WILL COME BACK ON. THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THE LIGHT WILL STAY ON. PRIMARILY HAPPENS ON THE DRIVERS SIDE LIGHT BUT PASSENGER SIDE HAS ALSO GONE OUT. THEY HAVE NEVER(AS YET) BOTH GONE OUT AT THE SAME TIME. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10317463

30,200 miles · Mar 6, 2010
Exterior Lighting

APPROX. ONE MONTH AGO I NOTICED THAT THE HEADLIGHTS ON MY 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS WOULD INTERMITTENTLY TURN OFF WHILE I WAS DRIVING. THIS HAS HAPPENED ON AT LEAST 4 OCCASIONS. THREE TIMES ONLY THE LEFT HEADLIGHT WOULD GO OUT, AND ONE TIME BOTH HEADLIGHTS WENT OUT SIMULTANEOUSLY. I DON'T DO TOO MUCH NIGHT DRIVING SO I DON'T KNOW EXA…

Read full complaint

APPROX. ONE MONTH AGO I NOTICED THAT THE HEADLIGHTS ON MY 2008 TOYOTA PRIUS WOULD INTERMITTENTLY TURN OFF WHILE I WAS DRIVING. THIS HAS HAPPENED ON AT LEAST 4 OCCASIONS. THREE TIMES ONLY THE LEFT HEADLIGHT WOULD GO OUT, AND ONE TIME BOTH HEADLIGHTS WENT OUT SIMULTANEOUSLY. I DON'T DO TOO MUCH NIGHT DRIVING SO I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHEN THE PROBLEM BEGAN, BUT MY BEST ESTIMATE IS ONE MONTH AGO. AGAIN, THIS IS AN INTERMITTENT PROBLEM AS THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE TIME THE HEADLIGHTS ARE WORKING AS THEY SHOULD. I KNOW OF NO CAUSE FOR THIS PROBLEM AS THE SITUATION HAS OCCURRED DURING FREEWAY DRIVING DURING CLEAR CONDITIONS AND RAIN CONDITIONS, AS WELL ON WHEN DRIVING ON SURFACE STREETS. WHEN BOTH HEADLIGHTS WENT COMPLETELY OUT IT WAS DUSK AND I WAS ONLY A BLOCK FROM HOME. THE 3 OTHER TIMES WHEN JUST THE LEFT HEADLIGHT WENT OUT I KNEW OF NO WAY TO GET THE LIGHT BACK ON AND JUST CONTINUED MY TRIP WITH ONE HEADLIGHT FUNCTIONING. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10317383

25,000 miles · Feb 23, 2010
Exterior Lighting

THE HIGH INTENSITY DISCHARGE ("HID") HEADLAMP ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE CONTINUES TO FLICKER ON AND OFF. THE CAR IS STILL UNDER WARRANTY, BUT ACCORDING TO TOYOTA, THEY ARE UNABLE TO REPLICATE THIS AND CONTINUE TO SEND ME BACK ON THE ROAD WITH MALFUNCTIONING HEADLIGHTS. THIS COMBINED WITH ISSUES SURROUNDING THE TRACTION CONTROL (SUB…

Read full complaint

THE HIGH INTENSITY DISCHARGE ("HID") HEADLAMP ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE CONTINUES TO FLICKER ON AND OFF. THE CAR IS STILL UNDER WARRANTY, BUT ACCORDING TO TOYOTA, THEY ARE UNABLE TO REPLICATE THIS AND CONTINUE TO SEND ME BACK ON THE ROAD WITH MALFUNCTIONING HEADLIGHTS. THIS COMBINED WITH ISSUES SURROUNDING THE TRACTION CONTROL (SUBMITTED IN A PRIOR COMPLAINT) RENDER THE VEHICLE DANGEROUS AND I AM NOW UNCOMFORTABLE DRIVING THIS VEHICLE. TOYOTA AND MY DEALERSHIP, WALSER TOYOTA OF BLOOMINGTON (MINNESOTA) HAVE REFUSED TO DO ANYTHING. I HAVE NOW SCHEDULED AN APPOINTMENT TO HAVE THE LIGHTS REPLACED AT MY OWN EXPENSE (DESPITE THE FACTORY WARRANTY). *TR

NHTSA ODI #10313324

20,000 miles · Feb 23, 2010
Exterior Lighting

WHILE DRIVING MY 2008 PRIUS AT APPROXIMATELY 2 A.M.ON A MOUNTAINOUS ROAD WITH MANY CURVES AND WILDLIFE THE PASSENGER HEADLIGHT WENT OUT IN BOTH THE HIGH AND LOW BEAMS. I WAS STARTLED AND SWERVED, BUT LUCKILY I MAINTAINED CONTROL OF THE CAR. I DID NOT FEEL SAFE DRIVING WHILE IT WAS STILL DARK. AT THE FIRST OPPORTUNITY I PULLED …

Read full complaint

WHILE DRIVING MY 2008 PRIUS AT APPROXIMATELY 2 A.M.ON A MOUNTAINOUS ROAD WITH MANY CURVES AND WILDLIFE THE PASSENGER HEADLIGHT WENT OUT IN BOTH THE HIGH AND LOW BEAMS. I WAS STARTLED AND SWERVED, BUT LUCKILY I MAINTAINED CONTROL OF THE CAR. I DID NOT FEEL SAFE DRIVING WHILE IT WAS STILL DARK. AT THE FIRST OPPORTUNITY I PULLED OF THE ROAD IN A SAFE PLACE AND SPENT THE REMAINDER OF THE NIGHT IN THE CAR. WHEN IT WAS LIGHT ENOUGH TO CONTINUE I DROVE TO MY DESTINATION AND CALLED THE LOCAL TOYOTA DEALER AND WAS UTTERLY SHOCKED WHEN I WAS TOLD WHAT IT WOULD COST TO REPLACE THE BULB. I AM ON A FIXED INCOME AND THIS POSED A FINANCIAL HARDSHIP. THE CAR ONLY HAD A LITTLE LESS THAN 20,000 MILES. I HAVE SINCE LEARNED THAT THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM. NOT ONLY IS THE COST TO REPLACE A BULB (YES A BULB) RIDICULOUS BUT THIS POSES A SAFETY HAZARD AND TOYOTA SHOULD "BE MADE" TO CORRECT THIS DEFECT. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10313126

22,400 miles · Feb 22, 2010
Electrical SystemExterior Lighting

I HAVE A 08 PRIUS. SEVERAL DAYS AGO SOMEONE TOLD ME THAT ONE DAY-TIME RUNNING LIGHT WAS OUT. TWO NIGHTS AGO I CHECKED AND BOTH LIGHTS WERE WORKING SO I THOUGHT I WAS OK. LAST NIGHT AFTER DRIVING ABOUT AN HOUR, BOTH HEAD LIGHTS WENT OUT. I TURNED THE SWITCH OFF AND ON AGAIN AND THE LIGHTS CAME BACK ON. ABOUT A MINUTE LATER T…

Read full complaint

I HAVE A 08 PRIUS. SEVERAL DAYS AGO SOMEONE TOLD ME THAT ONE DAY-TIME RUNNING LIGHT WAS OUT. TWO NIGHTS AGO I CHECKED AND BOTH LIGHTS WERE WORKING SO I THOUGHT I WAS OK. LAST NIGHT AFTER DRIVING ABOUT AN HOUR, BOTH HEAD LIGHTS WENT OUT. I TURNED THE SWITCH OFF AND ON AGAIN AND THE LIGHTS CAME BACK ON. ABOUT A MINUTE LATER THE RIGHT LIGHT WENT OFF. AFTER ANOTHER HOUR OF DRIVING THE LEFT LIGHT WENT OUT AND I REPEATED THE TURN ON CYCLE AND IT STAYED ANOTHER COUPLER HOURS. (I DROVE HOME WITH THE FLASHER AS THIS WOULD HAVE ENABLED ME TO SEE THE ROAD A LITTLE IS CASE THE LIGHT WENT OUT AGAIN., ) I MADE IT HOME OK AND AM CONTACTING MY DEALER TODAY. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10312625

Official recalls

4

12V536000 · Engine And Engine Cooling; Hybrid Propulsion System: Inverter

Nov 14, 2012

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Hybrid Propulsion System: Inverter

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Engine And Engine Cooling

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2003, through March 30, 2009 and FCHV-adv vehicles manufactured December 12, 2008, through September 13, 2011. During manufacturing, a scratch may have occurred inside of the electrically driven water pump at the coil wire. The coil wire may corrode at the scratched portion.

Consequence: The corroded coil wire may break and the water pump could stop. The corroded coil wire could cause a short circuit between coil wires and a possible open fuse, creating a stall-like condition of the hybrid system while the vehicle is being driven. This may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify its owners, and dealers will replace the electric water pump, free of charge. The recall began on January 17, 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

12V537000 · Steering; Steering:gear Box:shaft Sector

Nov 14, 2012

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Steering:gear Box:shaft Sector

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

Steering

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2009 Prius vehicles manufactured August 5, 2003, through March 30, 2009. The affected vehicles have a steering intermediate extension shaft assembly built with metal splines that complete the connection from the steering wheel to the steering gear. These splines may have been manufactured with an insufficient hardness.

Consequence: Over time, the splines may wear and eventually fail resulting in a loss of steering ability, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the extension shaft and replace it if it is one with insufficient hardness, free of charge. The recall began during December 2012. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

10V036000 · Equipment:other:labels

Feb 3, 2010

SOUTHEAST TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2005-2011 PASSENGER VEHICLES FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 110, "TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS." THESE VEHICLES WERE SOLD WITHOUT THE REQUISITE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY MODIFICATION LABELS.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A DRIVER MAY OVERLOAD A VEHICLE WHICH MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL MAIL TO CONSUMERS THE CORRECTED LABEL OR THE CUSTOMER WILL HAVE THE OPTION FOR DEALERS TO INSTALL THE LABEL FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 27, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT SOUTHEAST TOYOTA AT 1-800-301-6859.

09V388000 · Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

Oct 5, 2009

TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2004-2010 PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL CAN GET STUCK IN THE WIDE OPEN POSITION DUE TO ITS BEING TRAPPED BY AN UNSECURED OR INCOMPATIBLE DRIVER'S FLOOR MAT.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A STUCK OPEN ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY RESULT IN VERY HIGH VEHICLE SPEEDS AND MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO STOP THE VEHICLE, WHICH COULD CAUSE A CRASH, SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH.

Remedy: TOYOTA FILED AN AMENDED DEFECT REPORT ON NOVEMBER 25, 2009, STATING THAT DEALERS WILL MODIFY THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL AND, ON CERTAIN VEHICLES, ALTER THE SHAPE OF THE FLOOR SURFACE UNDER THE PEDAL. THESE CHANGES ADDRESS THE RISK OF PEDAL ENTRAPMENT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITH THE FLOOR MAT. REDESIGNED ACCELERATOR PEDALS WILL BECOME AVAILABLE BEGINNING IN APRIL 2010 AND DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY MODIFIED PEDAL WITH THE NEW PEDAL IF DESIRED. ALSO, DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY GENUINE TOYOTA OR LEXUS ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MATS WITH REDESIGNED ALL-WEATHER MATS, OR REPURCHASE THE PREVIOUS MATS FROM OWNERS WHO DO NOT WANT THE NEW ONES. ADDITIONALLY, SOFTWARE MODIFICATIONS WILL BE INSTALLED ON CAMRY, AVALON AND LEXUS ES 350, IS 350 AND IS 250 MODELS THAT WILL ENSURE THAT THE BRAKE OVERRIDES THE ACCELERATOR IN THE EVENT BOTH BRAKE AND ACCELERATOR PEDALS ARE APPLIED. TOYOTA WILL BEGIN MAILING LETTERS TO OWNERS ON DECEMBER 31, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TOYOTA AT 1-800-331-4331, LEXUS AT 1-800-255-3987.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

2

DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds

Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System

NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.

DP13001 · Intermediate Steering Shaft Separation

Opened Feb 21, 2013 · Closed Apr 8, 2020

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Steering; Steering:column; Steering:linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Additional source detail variants (3)

Steering:column

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Steering:linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606

Steering

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a January 2013 defect petition requesting that it open an investigation on Model Year (MY) 2004-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles to address a possible manufacturing safety defect related to the steering column intermediate shaft.During the defect petition evaluation, ODI: 1.Reviewed the petition and its enclosures; 2.Reviewed the subject steering system layout; 3.Examined the Petition Vehicle?s history, including its repair history; 4.Reviewed and followed-up potentially related consumer complaints; 5.Assessed Safety Recalls 06V-188 and 12V-537; and, 6.Requested and examined complaint, claim, field report, service history, and warranty information from Toyota.ODI's review revealed that the petition vehicle had been recalled (Recall 06V188) to remedy a defect in the system identified in the petition with the remedy taking place prior to the failure that prompted the petition. Circumstances point to incorrect reassembly of the petitioner's vehicle by those who performed the recall remedy.ODI examined the issues raised by this petition to identify any related safety defect trend in the general subject vehicle population.That review identified a low rate of related consumer complaints (twenty-five over a eight year period from a population of over 600,000 vehicles) and no pattern that would identify either a safety defect not already covered by the two existing steering safety recalls by Toyota or a systematic problem with either recall remedy.Based on this evaluation, ODI does not believe that additional investigation will lead to a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists in the subject vehicles. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA?s limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For more information, see the Federal Register notice in the public file for this action (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle, select NHTSA ID, enter: DP13001)The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed on-line (https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls#vehicle) under the following NHTSA ID numbers:10407520, 10418710, 10429551, 10473654, 10478195, 10478053, 10437229, 10489425, 10510722, 10639984, 10648277, 10499778, 10712626, 10723196, 10787530, 10808124, 10838803, 11071646, 11098144, 11099507, 11102659, 11160767, 11192607, 11287550, 11287606