AEB MALFUNCTIONING BRAKES APPLY INTERMITTENTLY WHILE DRIVING WITH NO OBSTRUCTION IN FRONT OF THE CAR. VERY SERIOUS AND DANGEROUS SITUATION. WHILE MY WIFE WAS DRIVING ON A 40MPH SPEED LIMIT ROAD THE BRAKES APPLIED AND SHE JUST MISSED BEING REAR ENDED.
2018 Nissan Rogue
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
More warning signs than most Rogue years
Owner complaints for the 2018 Nissan Rogue are substantially higher than the model-year median of 320.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Rogue years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
409 reports with mileage · 258 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Service Brakes. Review the 261 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Forward Collision Avoidance. Review the 174 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Electrical System. Review the 94 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
Service Brakes complaints
261 reportsTHE AEB SYSTEM IS MALFUNCTIONING. ON MULTIPLE OCCASSIONS THE CAR SUDDENLY BREAKS EVENTHOUGH THERE IS NOTHING IN FRONT OF THE CAR. IT HAS ONLY HAPPENED TO ME WHILE ON THE HIGHWAY - GENERALLY THE ROADS ARE CLEAR. ON ONE OF THE MULTIPLE OCCASSIONS, CLEARING THE RADAR OF BUG SPLATTER SOLVED THE PROBLEM. ON ALL THE OTHER OCCASSIONS, …
Read full complaint
THE AEB SYSTEM IS MALFUNCTIONING. ON MULTIPLE OCCASSIONS THE CAR SUDDENLY BREAKS EVENTHOUGH THERE IS NOTHING IN FRONT OF THE CAR. IT HAS ONLY HAPPENED TO ME WHILE ON THE HIGHWAY - GENERALLY THE ROADS ARE CLEAR. ON ONE OF THE MULTIPLE OCCASSIONS, CLEARING THE RADAR OF BUG SPLATTER SOLVED THE PROBLEM. ON ALL THE OTHER OCCASSIONS, THERE WAS NO OBSTRUCTION TO THE RADAR. THE BRAKES COME ON, THE AEB LIGHT ON THE CONSOLE COMES ON, A WARNING FLASHES, AND THEN THE CAR MOVES ON AS IF NOTHING HAPPENED. AFTER DOING THIS SEVERAL TIMES OVER SEVERAL MILES, THE AEB LIGHT COMES ON AND IT DESPLAYS AN ERROR MESSAGE ABOUT THE FRONT RADAR IS NOT WORKING AND THE CRUISE IS DISABLED. ON ONE OF THE OCCASSIONS A LARGE PICKUP TRUCK TOWING A TRAILER WAS RIGHT BEHIND ME WHEN THE CAR SUDDENLY PUT ON THE BRAKES. FORTUNATELY, HE WAS ABLE TO STOP BEFORE HITTING MY CAR. WHEN I HAD THE CAR SERVICED AT THE DEALER, I TOLD THE SERVICE REP ABOUT THE ISSUE. HE INDICATED THAT A SHADOW OR SOMETHING LIKE A LEAF BLOWN ACROSS THE RADAR CAN CAUSE IT TO REACT. I DID NOT NOTICE ANY OCCRENCE OF SUCH. I AM EXTREMELY CONCERNED THAT SOMEONE FOLLOWING TO CLOSE WILL END UP RAMMING ME IN THE REAR END. AFTER DOING AN INTERNET SEARCH, I HAVE FOUND MULTIPLE OCCURENCES OF THIS PROBLEM AND THAT NISSAN HAS SENT OUT SEVERAL TECHNICAL BULLETINS ABOUT THE PROBLEM. AS NOTED ABOVE, THERE HAVE BEEN MULTIPLE EVENTS OF THIS TYPE. IT TYPICALLY HAPPENS ON THE HIGHWAY.
ON OCT 24TH I WAS ON MY WAY TO DRIVE MY AUTISTIC SON TO HIS DAY PROGRAM WHICH IS LESS THEN A MILE AWAY. AS I WAS DRIVING THE EMERGENCY BRAKE CAME ON AND PULLING ME TO A STOP, THEN I PROCEEDED TO PULL OVER AFTER BEING SHAKEN UP ALONG WITH MY SON. THEN CONTINUE TO TRY AGAIN. I CALLED NISSAN AND THEY TOLD ME I CAN BRING THE CAR IN…
Read full complaint
ON OCT 24TH I WAS ON MY WAY TO DRIVE MY AUTISTIC SON TO HIS DAY PROGRAM WHICH IS LESS THEN A MILE AWAY. AS I WAS DRIVING THE EMERGENCY BRAKE CAME ON AND PULLING ME TO A STOP, THEN I PROCEEDED TO PULL OVER AFTER BEING SHAKEN UP ALONG WITH MY SON. THEN CONTINUE TO TRY AGAIN. I CALLED NISSAN AND THEY TOLD ME I CAN BRING THE CAR IN THE NEXT DAY. I DID AND THAT AFTERNOON THEY INFORMED ME THEY FIXED THE SENSOR AND EVERYTHING IS FINE NOW. ON NOV 7TH I WAS DRIVING ON THE SERVICE ROAD WITH IS ALONG SIDE THE HIGHWAY GOING TO LUNCH WITH MY SON AND HIS RESPITE WORKER AND AGAIN THE EMERGENCY BRAKE PULLED US TO A STOP THAT NEARLY CAUSE US AND OTHERS INTO A ACCIDENT BECAUSE ITS A VERY BUSY SERVICE ROAD. AGAIN I PULLED OVER UPSET AND CALLED NISSAN AND I WAS TOLD BRING IT IN TOMORROW MORNING. I HEADED HOME VERY SLOWLY. THAT TIME THEY KEPT THE CAR OVERNIGHT. AGAIN I WAS TOLD IT WAS THE SENSOR. I PICKED UP THE CAR ON NOV 9TH. ON NOV 10TH MY SON, HIS WORKER AND I WERE GOING TO LUNCH AGAIN AND THEN SHOPPING SO I DECIDED TO GET ON THE HIGHWAY AND THATS WHEN IT HAPPEN AGAIN NEARLY CAUSING ANOTHER INCIDENT WHICH WAS EXTREMELY SCARY BEING ON THE HIGHWAY. IT PULLING UP AND CAME TO A STOP CAUSING BEEPING AND CARS NEARLY HITTING US. I CALLED NISSAN VERY UPSET AND THEY SAID BRING IT IN. WHILE DRIVING IT VERY VERY SLOW IT DID IT TWO MORE TIMES TRYING TO STOP. AT THAT TIME THEY FINALLY OFFERED ME A LOANER AND DAYS LATER TOOK IT BACK AND WANTED TO CHARGE ME SO I GAVE IT BACK. THEN THEY TOLD ME THEY CHANGE THE BRACKETS NEAR THE SENSOR. WHICH SHOULD OF BEEN DONE THE FIRST TIME. I REFUSE TO HAVE A CAR AN PLAY RUSSIAN ROULETTE WITH MINE AND MY FAMILIES LIVES. I AM EXTREMELY SCARED TO GO ON A HIGHWAY AND THIS IS WHAT IM UP AGAINST. *DT
IN CONSISTENT BRAKING. WHEN APPLYING THE BRAKES THE PEDAL FEELS MUSHY AND THE BRAKING POOR. I WAITING ABOUT 300 MILES HOPING THAT THE BRAKES WOULD BED IN AND START TO WORK CORRECTLY BUT IT DID NOT HAPPEN. AFTER HAVING SEVERAL SCARES WHERE THE COLLISION AVOIDANCE HAD TO INTERVENE TO PREVENT AN ACCIDENT. INFORMING THE DEALER OF TH…
Read full complaint
IN CONSISTENT BRAKING. WHEN APPLYING THE BRAKES THE PEDAL FEELS MUSHY AND THE BRAKING POOR. I WAITING ABOUT 300 MILES HOPING THAT THE BRAKES WOULD BED IN AND START TO WORK CORRECTLY BUT IT DID NOT HAPPEN. AFTER HAVING SEVERAL SCARES WHERE THE COLLISION AVOIDANCE HAD TO INTERVENE TO PREVENT AN ACCIDENT. INFORMING THE DEALER OF THE PROBLEM THEY BLEED THE BRAKES TWICE ON 2 SEPARATE OCCASIONS AND THE BRAKES FELT A LITTLE BETTER BUT STILL DID NOT INSPIRE CONFIDENCE..ON THE 3RD TIME GOING TO THE DEALER INFORMING THE DEALER AND NISSAN CORPORATE ABOUT THE BRAKES ISSUE NISSAN IN FORMED THE DEALER TO REPLACE THE CALIBERS AND THE BRAKE HOSES. THE VEHICLE HAS SPENT A TOTAL OF 3 WEEKS AT THE DEALER FOR THE BRAKE ISSUE. AS OF TODAY 11-12-2018 THE VEHICLE IS STILL AT THE DEALER WAITING ON PARTS AND A SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM
WHEN THE ENGINE IS STARTED COLD. SITTING FOR 6 HOURS OR MORE. THERE IS A RATTLING SOUND COMING FROM THE ENGINE AS IF THERE WERE TOO MUCH ENGINE BEARING CLEARANCE. AFTER 2 SECONDS THE NOISE GOES AWAY. DEALER SAYS THEY CAN NOT DUPLICATED IT BUT I HAVE 2 AUDIOS OF IT AND PRESENTED TO THEM.
MULTIPLE OCCURRENCES OF CAR TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEM WARNING LIGHT APPEARING ON DASH AND IT SEEMED THE BRAKES WERE GOING ON TOO, WITHOUT BEING APPLIED. BUT I DIDN'T BELIEVE THAT COULD HAPPEN ON ITS OWN. IT HAPPENED ONE TIME ON EXPRESSWAY BUT I THOUGHT I MUST HAVE HIT A POTHOLE (CAR WAS PRETTY NEW THEN) AND HAPPENED MUL…
Read full complaint
MULTIPLE OCCURRENCES OF CAR TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEM WARNING LIGHT APPEARING ON DASH AND IT SEEMED THE BRAKES WERE GOING ON TOO, WITHOUT BEING APPLIED. BUT I DIDN'T BELIEVE THAT COULD HAPPEN ON ITS OWN. IT HAPPENED ONE TIME ON EXPRESSWAY BUT I THOUGHT I MUST HAVE HIT A POTHOLE (CAR WAS PRETTY NEW THEN) AND HAPPENED MULTIPLE TIMES ON SURFACE STREETS. DEALERSHIP TOLD ME TIRE PRESSURE WAS NOT EVEN AND THAT SENSOR WAS VERY SENSITIVE. WHY THE CAR WAS BRAKING WAS BEYOND ME, BUT WAS ATTRIBUTED TO UNEVEN TIRE PRESSURE. IT HAPPENED AGAIN AND THIS TIME TIRE PRESSURE WAS AT 33 PSI ON ALL TIRES (RECOMMENDED NUMBER ON EACH TIRE), SO I BROUGHT IT TO DEALER AGAIN. THIS TIME IT WAS THOROUGHLY EXAMINED AND I WAS QUESTIONED THOROUGHLY ON THE SITUATIONS WHEN THIS HAPPENED. THE COLLISION MONITORING SYSTEM UNIT(S) WERE REPLACED. CAR HAD 9,800 MILES. THE TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEM WAS FINE. SCARY SITUATION AND I MUST ADMIT I'M APPREHENSIVE TO BE DRIVING IT STILL. BUT, IT'S A LEASE SO I'M COMMITTED. I SHOULD FIND COMFORT IN THE FACT THAT THE PARTS WERE REPLACED, HOWEVER, I'M NOT YET COMFORTABLE. SO, I THOUGHT IT NEEDED TO BE REPORTED SO OTHERS CAN BE AWARE. *DT *JB
WHILE ACCELERATING ON A COUNTY STREET, AT ALMOST 40 MPH, MY CAR DECIDED TO SUDDENLY BRAKE AND ALMOST IMMEDIATELY STOP. IT VIBRATED AND WE HEARD A LOUD GRINDING TYPE NOISE. I REMOVED MY FOOT FROM ACCELERATOR, AND AFTER JUST A SECOND, THE BRAKING STOPPED AND I WAS ABLE TO ACCELERATE AGAIN. I WAS ALMOST REAR-ENDED BY THE CAR BEH…
Read full complaint
WHILE ACCELERATING ON A COUNTY STREET, AT ALMOST 40 MPH, MY CAR DECIDED TO SUDDENLY BRAKE AND ALMOST IMMEDIATELY STOP. IT VIBRATED AND WE HEARD A LOUD GRINDING TYPE NOISE. I REMOVED MY FOOT FROM ACCELERATOR, AND AFTER JUST A SECOND, THE BRAKING STOPPED AND I WAS ABLE TO ACCELERATE AGAIN. I WAS ALMOST REAR-ENDED BY THE CAR BEHIND ME. NO WARNING LIGHTS OR SOUNDS WERE HEARD. THE CAR HAS ABOUT 15,500 MILES. THIS IS THE SECOND TIME THAT THIS HAS HAPPENED. THE FIRST TIME WAS JUST STARTING TO ACCELERATE FROM A STOP LIGHT, SO IT WAS AT ONLY ABOUT 10 MPH. THEN THE DEALERSHIP SAID NO CODES WERE THROWN, SO THEY COULD NOT FIND A PROBLEM TO FIX. IT'S IN THE DEALERSHIP AGAIN TODAY, HOPING THAT THEY CAN FIGURE OUT THE PROBLEM AND FIX IT. I'M SCARED TO DRIVE THIS ON THE FREEWAY, OR ACTUALLY ANYWHERE I WANT TO GO MORE THAN 10 MILES PER HOUR...SO THAT WOULD BE EVERY TIME I WANT TO DRIVE MY CAR!
I WAS DRIVING AROUND 11AM USING LOCAL ROADS. I HAD BEEN DRIVING ABOUT 5 MINUTES WHEN I PULLED UP TO A STOP SIGN. IT WAS A CLEAR DAY, LIGHT TRAFFIC, DRY PAVEMENT, NO LEAVES OR OTHER ROAD DEBRIS. AS I PULLED AWAY FROM THE STOP SIGN, WITHIN 20 FEET, THE CAR SUDDENLY STARTED SHAKING AND STOPPING. IT MADE AN INCREDIBLY LOUD NOISE…
Read full complaint
I WAS DRIVING AROUND 11AM USING LOCAL ROADS. I HAD BEEN DRIVING ABOUT 5 MINUTES WHEN I PULLED UP TO A STOP SIGN. IT WAS A CLEAR DAY, LIGHT TRAFFIC, DRY PAVEMENT, NO LEAVES OR OTHER ROAD DEBRIS. AS I PULLED AWAY FROM THE STOP SIGN, WITHIN 20 FEET, THE CAR SUDDENLY STARTED SHAKING AND STOPPING. IT MADE AN INCREDIBLY LOUD NOISE. I IMMEDIATELY PULLED OVER THE SHOULDER. THERE WERE NO MESSAGES ON THE DASH OR BEHIND THE STEERING WHEEL. AFTER SITTING THERE A FEW MINUTES, I PROCEEDED HOME WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. LATER THAT DAY, I DROPPED THE CAR OFF AT THE CAR DEALER TO CHECK INTO THIS PROBLEM. I WAS GIVEN A LOANER CAR, AND BY THE FOLLOWING MONDAY, GOT A CALL TO COME AND PICK UP MY CAR. THE SERVICE TEAM WAS UNABLE TO REPLICATE THE PROBLEM, SO NOTHING WAS FIXED. THIS ALSO HAPPENED ON SEPTEMBER 24, 2018. THIS TIME, I WAS EXITING A HIGHWAY AND WAS SLOWING DOWN ON A RAMP. THE CAR SUDDENLY STARTED SHAKING AND MADE A LOUD NOISE. IT GRINDED TO A STOP. IT WAS STARTLING TO ME, AS I'VE NEVER HAD A CAR DO THIS TO ME BEFORE. I ASSUMED THERE WAS SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE ROAD SURFACE AND FIGURED THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKE OR THE COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM HAD ENGAGED. I WAS TAKING A FRIEND HOME FROM CANCER SURGERY THAT DAY, SO I DIDN'T THINK ABOUT IT A WHOLE LOT. I HAD OTHER WORRIES. IN CONSIDERING WHAT HAPPENED, I BELIEVE THAT THE BRAKES AUTOMATICALLY ENGAGED IN BOTH CASES. IT SEEMED LIKE THE CAR WAS DETERMINED TO STOP, EVEN THOUGH THERE WERE NO OBSTACLES IN MY WAY. I HAD NO CONTROL OVER THE CAR. IT'S AN UNNERVING THING TO HAVE OCCUR, BUT AT LEAST I WAS GOING SLOW AND DIDN'T HAVE CARS BEHIND ME. I'M CONCERNED THAT IF IT HAPPENED AS I'M GOING AT A HIGH RATE OF SPEED ON A HIGHWAY, IT COULD CAUSE A CAR TO REAR-END ME, OR CAUSE MY CAR TO SWERVE OUT OF CONTROL AND CAUSE AN ACCIDENT.
WHILE DRIVING ON A STAIGHT ROADWAY THE VEHICLE STARTED TO SHAKE AND AN ALARM SOUNDED AND A RED BOX WITH A YELLOW TRIANGLE APPEARED ON THE DISPLAY AND THE CAR BEGAN TO SLOW DOWN AS IF TO AVOID A CRASH OR SOMETHING IN THE ROADWAY. THERE WAS NOTHING IN THE ROADWAY, NO CARS, NO DEER, NO PEOPLE. LUCKILY THERE WAS NO ONE BEHIND ME E…
Read full complaint
WHILE DRIVING ON A STAIGHT ROADWAY THE VEHICLE STARTED TO SHAKE AND AN ALARM SOUNDED AND A RED BOX WITH A YELLOW TRIANGLE APPEARED ON THE DISPLAY AND THE CAR BEGAN TO SLOW DOWN AS IF TO AVOID A CRASH OR SOMETHING IN THE ROADWAY. THERE WAS NOTHING IN THE ROADWAY, NO CARS, NO DEER, NO PEOPLE. LUCKILY THERE WAS NO ONE BEHIND ME EITHER. I WAS SHOCKED THAT HIS HAPPENED UNTIL I READ THAT THIS IS HAPPENING WITH A LOT OF ROGUE'S FROM 2018 MODEL YEAR. CONTACTED NISSAN AND WAS TOLD TO CALL THE DEARLERSHIP. DEALERSHIP SAID TO BRING IT IN FOR AN INSPECTION. THE INCIDENT LASTED ABOUT 20 SECONDS AND THEN THE CAR RESUMED NORMAL FUNCTION.
THE FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE (FCA) / AUTOMATIC EMERGENCY BRAKING SYSTEM INADVERTENTLY ACTIVATED RESULTING THE BRAKES BEING ABRUPTLY APPLIED WHILE DRIVING FORWARD ON A NEIGHBORHOOD THOROUGHFARE AT 40 MPH AND NOTHING IN FRONT OF ME.. THERE WAS A VEHICLE FOLLOWING ME WHICH HAD TO SWERVE AROUND ME OR ELSE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN A …
Read full complaint
THE FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE (FCA) / AUTOMATIC EMERGENCY BRAKING SYSTEM INADVERTENTLY ACTIVATED RESULTING THE BRAKES BEING ABRUPTLY APPLIED WHILE DRIVING FORWARD ON A NEIGHBORHOOD THOROUGHFARE AT 40 MPH AND NOTHING IN FRONT OF ME.. THERE WAS A VEHICLE FOLLOWING ME WHICH HAD TO SWERVE AROUND ME OR ELSE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN A REAR COLLISION. THE SYSTEM GENERATED A FALSE WARNING WITH A BEEPING AND DASHBOARD LIGHTS. THIS IS THE 1ST TIME THE VEHICLE HAS APPLIED THE BRAKES IN THE 3 MONTHS I'VE HAD THE VEHICLE. I HAVE CALLED THE AUTONATION PINECREST DEALERSHIP AND THEY TOLD ME TO BRING THE VEHICLE IN TO CHECK THE FCA SENSOR BECAUSE THEY HAVE SIMILAR COMPLAINTS FROM OTHER NEW ROGUE OWNERS.
Official recalls
323V093000 · Electrical SYSTEM:IGNITION:ANTI-THEFT:IMMOBILIZER/PROXIMITY:KEY/SENDER
Feb 16, 2023
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2014-2020 Rogue and 2017-2022 Rogue Sport vehicles equipped with a jackknife style ignition key. The jackknife key may collapse into a folded position while driving.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: Driver contact with a key in the collapsed position could inadvertently shut off the vehicle while driving, increasing the risk of a crash. Additionally, if the vehicle shuts off while driving, the air bags may not deploy in a crash as intended, increasing the risk of injury.
Remedy: Dealers will insert a spacer into the key slot of the jackknife key, free of charge. Interim notification letters notifying owners of the safety risk were mailed March 29, 2023. Owner notification letters are expected to be mailed August 30, 2023. Owners may contact Nissan's customer service at 1-800-867-7669. Nissan's number for this recall is R22C5.
21V839000 · Engine And Engine Cooling:engine:engine Control Module (ecu/ecm); Hybrid Propulsion System
Oct 26, 2021
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2017-2019 Rogue Hybrid vehicles. Contact with the Electronic Control Module (ECM) bracket may damage the engine harness, causing a blown fuse.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: A blown fuse may cause an engine stall, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Dealers will install a harness protector cover, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed December 16, 2021. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-867-7669. Nissan's number for this recall is R21B6.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Engine And Engine Cooling:engine:engine Control Module (ecu/ecm)
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2017-2019 Rogue Hybrid vehicles. Contact with the Electronic Control Module (ECM) bracket may damage the engine harness, causing a blown fuse.
Consequence: A blown fuse may cause an engine stall, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Dealers will install a harness protector cover, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed December 16, 2021. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-867-7669. Nissan's number for this recall is R21B6.
Hybrid Propulsion System
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2017-2019 Rogue Hybrid vehicles. Contact with the Electronic Control Module (ECM) bracket may damage the engine harness, causing a blown fuse.
Consequence: A blown fuse may cause an engine stall, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Dealers will install a harness protector cover, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed December 16, 2021. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-867-7669. Nissan's number for this recall is R21B6.
19V654000 · Back Over Prevention: Sensing System: Camera
Sep 12, 2019
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2018-2019 Nissan Altima, Armada, Frontier, Kicks, Leaf, Maxima, Murano, NV, NV200, Pathfinder, Rogue, Rogue Sport, Sentra, Titan, Titan Diesel, Versa Note and Versa Sedan vehicles, as well as Infiniti Q50, Q60, QX30 and QX80 vehicles. Additionally included are 2019 Nissan GT-R and Taxi and Infiniti QX50, QX60, Q70, Q70L vehicles. The back-up camera and display settings can be adjusted such that the rear view image is no longer visible and the system will retain that setting the next time the vehicle is placed in reverse. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 111, "Rear Visibility."
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: The lack of an image in the back-up camera display increases the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Nissan will notify owners in phases, having dealers update the back-up camera settings software, free of charge. The recall began November 11, 2019 and all affected VINs should be activated. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-867-7669 or INFINITI customer service at 1-800-662-6200.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
2PE19010 · False Automatic Emergency Braking
Opened Sep 9, 2019 · No close date supplied
Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Forward Collision Avoidance: Automatic Emergency Braking
NHTSA received a defect petition (DP19-001) from the Center for Auto Safety (CAS) on March 21, 2019 alleging that the Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) system on Model Year (MY) 2017-2018 Nissan Rogue and Rogue Sport vehicles was engaging in cases where there was no obstruction in the path of the vehicle. The CAS petition additionally alleges that, based on Nissan's actions, the manufacturer is aware of the issue due to issuing a Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) launching two "Quality Actions," and initiating a "Customer Service Initiative" in relation to it. CAS contends that Nissan's actions do not represent an adequate long-term solution to the problem, as the action is only available during the basic coverage period of the warranty. CAS also argues that the alleged failures are an unreasonable risk to safety and views Nissan's communications as not acknowledging the potential safety issue involved, instead treating the alleged problem as a performance update.The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) analyzed Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) complaints received from consumers and identified a total of 129 unique subject vehicle reports (for all submission dates) alleging a false positive triggering of AEB. Of these complaints, three were identified that contained allegations of a collision resulting from the activation of the system, and all three indicating related injuries.In response to ODI's April 15, 2019 Information Request letter, Nissan provided data indicating that it has received 750 unique subject vehicle complaints relating to false positive activation of the AEB system. Of these complaints, 12 were identified that contained allegations of a collision resulting from the activation of the system. Four complaints contained allegations of injuries, three of which were the result of a collision. These complaints included duplicates of complaints that ODI received. The injury allegations were limited to soft tissue type injuries such as whiplash and bruising.Based on its review of the information identified to date, ODI has granted the petition and is opening this preliminary evaluation in order to evaluate the cause, scope and frequency of AEB false positive activations, as well as to evaluate the suitability of the manufacturer's campaign to address the concern or improve performance of the AEB system. The complaints cited can be viewed at NHTSA.gov under the following ODI identification numbers: 11230875, 11230481, 11230361, 11229400, 11229302, 11229294, 11228994, 11223074, 11222925, 11222644, 11220499, 11218713, 11218608, 11217157, 11210334, 11210256, 11210148, 11209127, 11209032, 11207333, 11205931, 11205717, 11205661, 11205172, 11205124, 11205027, 11204803, 11204349, 11204324, 11196805, 11196561, 11196466, 11196091, 11195938, 11195574, 11194380, 11193989, 11192761, 11192283, 11192063, 11190855, 11190840, 11189976, 11187374, 11186903, 11185890, 11185883, 11185132, 11183406, 11180813, 11174713, 11173666, 11173302, 11172299, 11171331, 11170989, 11165434, 11164646, 11162898, 11162502, 11162396, 11161413, 11161230, 11155985, 11155209, 11155181, 11154181, 11153607, 11153334, 11151373, 11151028, 11142595, 11142557, 11142386, 11141775, 11141433, 11141387, 11141347, 11140604, 11139711, 11139226, 11133402, 11132376, 11130998, 11130662, 11129949, 11128704, 11124099, 11123564, 11123353, 11123321, 11122783, 11119475, 11119300, 11118604, 11115088, 11113479, 11113371, 11112371, 11111659, 11111057, 11110919, 11110689, 11104075, 11103844, 11103437, 11102715, 11102333, 11100117, 11099313, 11091006, 11089960, 11089798, 11089533, 11088815, 11088718, 11081072, 11079453, 11073644, 11072718, 11065505, 11061598, 11057739, 11056061, 11055766, 11048349, 11035301, 11033225, and 10972343.
DP19001 · False Automatic Emergency Braking
Opened Apr 8, 2019 · Closed Sep 16, 2019
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Forward Collision Avoidance: Automatic Emergency Braking
NHTSA received a letter from the Center for Auto Safety (CAS) on March 21, 2019 alleging that the Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) system on Model Year (MY) 2017-2018 Nissan Rogue and Rogue Sport vehicles was engaging in cases where there was no obstruction in the path of the vehicle. The CAS petition additionally alleged that, based on Nissan's actions, the manufacturer was aware of the issue due to issuing a Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) launching two Quality Actions, and initiation of a Customer Service Initiative in relation to it. CAS contended that Nissan's actions do not represent an adequate long-term solution to the problem, as the action is only available during the basic coverage period of the warranty. CAS also argued that the alleged failures are an unreasonable risk to safety and views Nissan's communications as not acknowledging the potential safety issue involved, instead treating the alleged problem as a performance update.The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) analyzed Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) complaints received from consumers and identified a total of 129 unique subject vehicle reports (for all submission dates) alleging a false positive triggering of AEB. Of these complaints, three were identified that contained allegations of a collision resulting from the activation of the system, and all three indicating related injuries.In response to ODI's April 15, 2019 Information Request letter, Nissan provided data indicating that it has received 750 unique subject vehicle complaints relating to false positive activation of the AEB system. Of these complaints, 12 were identified that contained allegations of a collision resulting from the activation of the system. Four complaints contained allegations of injuries, three of which were the result of a collision. These complaints included duplicates of complaints that ODI received. The injury allegations were limited to soft tissue type injuries such as whiplash and bruising.Based on its review of the information identified to date, ODI grants this petition and has opened preliminary evaluation PE19-010 in order to evaluate the cause, scope and frequency of AEB false positive activations, as well as to evaluate the suitability of the manufacturer's campaign to address the concern or improve performance of the AEB system. The complaints cited can be viewed at NHTSA.gov under the following ODI identification numbers: 11230875, 11230481, 11230361, 11229400, 11229302, 11229294, 11228994, 11223074, 11222925, 11222644, 11220499, 11218713, 11218608, 11217157, 11210334, 11210256, 11210148, 11209127, 11209032, 11207333, 11205931, 11205717, 11205661, 11205172, 11205124, 11205027, 11204803, 11204349, 11204324, 11196805, 11196561, 11196466, 11196091, 11195938, 11195574, 11194380, 11193989, 11192761, 11192283, 11192063, 11190855, 11190840, 11189976, 11187374, 11186903, 11185890, 11185883, 11185132, 11183406, 11180813, 11174713, 11173666, 11173302, 11172299, 11171331, 11170989, 11165434, 11164646, 11162898, 11162502, 11162396, 11161413, 11161230, 11155985, 11155209, 11155181, 11154181, 11153607, 11153334, 11151373, 11151028, 11142595, 11142557, 11142386, 11141775, 11141433, 11141387, 11141347, 11140604, 11139711, 11139226, 11133402, 11132376, 11130998, 11130662, 11129949, 11128704, 11124099, 11123564, 11123353, 11123321, 11122783, 11119475, 11119300, 11118604, 11115088, 11113479, 11113371, 11112371, 11111659, 11111057, 11110919, 11110689, 11104075, 11103844, 11103437, 11102715, 11102333, 11100117, 11099313, 11091006, 11089960, 11089798, 11089533, 11088815, 11088718, 11081072, 11079453, 11073644, 11072718, 11065505, 11061598, 11057739, 11056061, 11055766, 1104
Illustration