Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
380–25K
5025–50K
13750–75K
12275–100K
127100–150K
52150K+
526 reports with mileage · 109 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
Service Brakes. Review the 253 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Air Bags. Review the 91 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Electrical System. Review the 83 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
24 crash reports4 fire reports13 injury reports
What owners actually said
635 reports
44,000 miles · Jul 3, 2011
Visibility
SUNROOF EXPLODED OUT WHILE TRAVELING AT HIGHWAY SPEED (70 MPH) AT APPROXIMATELY 0930 AM. WEATHER CONDITIONS: CLEAR AND SUNNY. ROAD CONDITIONS: DRY AND SMOOTH, NO DEBRIS. NO OTHER VEHICLES TO THE FRONT OR SIDES SO IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO BE ROAD DEBRIS DAMAGE SUCH AS ROCKS OR OTHER DEBRIS. APPEARS TO BE A PRODUCT OR DESIGN DEFECT…
Read full complaint
SUNROOF EXPLODED OUT WHILE TRAVELING AT HIGHWAY SPEED (70 MPH) AT APPROXIMATELY 0930 AM. WEATHER CONDITIONS: CLEAR AND SUNNY. ROAD CONDITIONS: DRY AND SMOOTH, NO DEBRIS. NO OTHER VEHICLES TO THE FRONT OR SIDES SO IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO BE ROAD DEBRIS DAMAGE SUCH AS ROCKS OR OTHER DEBRIS. APPEARS TO BE A PRODUCT OR DESIGN DEFECT. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10410329
48,000 miles · Jun 20, 2011
Fuel System, Gasoline
CAN NOT FILL THE TANK WITH FUEL NO MATTER HOW SLOW YOU TRY. THE MECHANIC SAYS THE ROLL OVER SAFETY DEVICE IS THE PROBLEM WHICH REQUIRES A WHOLE NEW GAS TANK AT A COST OF OVER $1000.00
NHTSA ODI #10408257
57,000 miles · Mar 5, 2011
Engine And Engine Cooling
WE OWN A 2009 NISSAN MURANO SL BOUGHT NEW AND THE HEAD GASKET CRACKED LEAKING FLUIDS AND EMITTING A STRONG SMELL OF COOLANT. WE HAVE HAD A FEW UNPLEASANT REPAIRS, NEW BRAKES AT 30,000, NEW TIRES AT 32,000 AND NOW AT ONLY 57,000 MILES CRACKED HEAD GASKETS. WE HAVE HAD ALL THE RECOMMEND SERVICES PERFORMED. HAD WE WAITED WE JUST W…
Read full complaint
WE OWN A 2009 NISSAN MURANO SL BOUGHT NEW AND THE HEAD GASKET CRACKED LEAKING FLUIDS AND EMITTING A STRONG SMELL OF COOLANT. WE HAVE HAD A FEW UNPLEASANT REPAIRS, NEW BRAKES AT 30,000, NEW TIRES AT 32,000 AND NOW AT ONLY 57,000 MILES CRACKED HEAD GASKETS. WE HAVE HAD ALL THE RECOMMEND SERVICES PERFORMED. HAD WE WAITED WE JUST WOULD NEED TO GET USE TO THE SMELL OF COOLANT. IT WAS COVERED UNDER THE WARRANTY. BOTH THE NISSAN DEALER AND AN INDEPENDENT SHOP CONFIRMED THE NEED TO REPLACE BOTH HEAD GASKETS. THE ENGINE NEEDS TO BE DROPPED IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE REPAIR. WE HAVE BEEN WAITING A WEEK FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE REPAIRS. MANY REPORTS SHOW THAT THEIR MURANO JUST WAS NOT THE SAME AFTER THE HEAD GASKET ISSUE AND WE DON'T WANT TO HAVE ANOTHER FAILURE AND FIND OUT WHAT WILL HAPPEN WHEN IT OUR NISSAN TURNS 60,001....OUR CONCERN IS THE NUMBER OF MURANO'S THAT THIS KNOWN DEFECT AFFECTS. NISSAN HAS YET TO RELEASE THIS PROPRIETARY INFORMATION. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10386524
60,200 miles · Jan 22, 2011
Power Train
CRACKED METAL TRANSFER CASE UNDER NORMAL WORK-COMMUTE DRIVING CONDITIONS AT 60,200 MILES. CASE AND SEALS HAD TO BE REPLACED. CANNOT DRIVE VEHICLE. NISSAN HAS HAD THIS PROBLEM BEFORE - NOTE NISSAN SERVICE BULLETIN NTB04129. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10378261
50,000 miles · Jan 6, 2011
Power Train
AFTER SHIFTING GEAR IN THE 2009 NISSAN MURANO FROM DRIVE TO REVERSE OR REVERSE TO DRIVE, THE CAR CONTINUES TO ROLL IN PREVIOUS GEAR EVEN WITH THE GAS PEDAL PRESSED. THIS IS SEVERE ON HILLS AND HAS RESULTED IN NOT BEING ABLE TO DRIVE THE CAR IN THE DESIRED DIRECTION. THIS IS AN EXTREMELY DANGEROUS DEFECT. ALSO-THE CAR ENABLES …
Read full complaint
AFTER SHIFTING GEAR IN THE 2009 NISSAN MURANO FROM DRIVE TO REVERSE OR REVERSE TO DRIVE, THE CAR CONTINUES TO ROLL IN PREVIOUS GEAR EVEN WITH THE GAS PEDAL PRESSED. THIS IS SEVERE ON HILLS AND HAS RESULTED IN NOT BEING ABLE TO DRIVE THE CAR IN THE DESIRED DIRECTION. THIS IS AN EXTREMELY DANGEROUS DEFECT. ALSO-THE CAR ENABLES THE KEY TO BE REMOVED AND CAR SHUT OFF WHILE TRANSMISSION IS IN DRIVE OR REVERSE AND THE CAR CONTINUES TO MOVE IN EITHER DIRECTION EVEN WITH THE CAR POWERED OFF! IT DOES NOT LOCK OR PREVENT YOU FROM SHUTTING CAR OFF - EXTREMELY DANGEROUS!!! *TR
NHTSA ODI #10374892
Mileage unknown · Dec 8, 2010
Visibility
THE NIGHTTIME VISIBILITY WHEN DRIVING MY RECENTLY ACQUIRED MURANO IN REVERSE IS EXTREMELY POOR. IT MAKES DRIVING DANGEROUS. NISSAN HAS REFUSED TO FIX THIS SAFETY DEFECT, EVEN IF I AGREE TO PAY A REASONABLE AMOUNT FOR THE NECESSARY REPAIR. THE VEHICLE HAS VERY DARK TINTED WINDOWS. IT DOES NOT HAVE A REAR VIEW CAMERA. I BELIE…
Read full complaint
THE NIGHTTIME VISIBILITY WHEN DRIVING MY RECENTLY ACQUIRED MURANO IN REVERSE IS EXTREMELY POOR. IT MAKES DRIVING DANGEROUS. NISSAN HAS REFUSED TO FIX THIS SAFETY DEFECT, EVEN IF I AGREE TO PAY A REASONABLE AMOUNT FOR THE NECESSARY REPAIR. THE VEHICLE HAS VERY DARK TINTED WINDOWS. IT DOES NOT HAVE A REAR VIEW CAMERA. I BELIEVE NISSAN SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO REMEDY THIS SAFETY DEFECT.
NHTSA ODI #10370190
18,900 miles · Dec 3, 2010
Air Bags
I WAS DRIVING LAST NIGHT AND MY AIR BAG SENSOR STARTED BLINKING IN THE DASH FOR NO APPARENT REASON. LESS THEN 6 MONTHS AGO I HAD THE SAME ISSUE. I CONTACTED THE DEALERSHIP AND NISSAN CONSUMER AFFAIRS TO INFORM THEM OF THE PROBLEM. THEY HAD MY CAR FOR ALMOST A MONTH AND I THOUGHT IT HAD BEEN FIXED. THIS IS THE SECOND TIME FOR…
Read full complaint
I WAS DRIVING LAST NIGHT AND MY AIR BAG SENSOR STARTED BLINKING IN THE DASH FOR NO APPARENT REASON. LESS THEN 6 MONTHS AGO I HAD THE SAME ISSUE. I CONTACTED THE DEALERSHIP AND NISSAN CONSUMER AFFAIRS TO INFORM THEM OF THE PROBLEM. THEY HAD MY CAR FOR ALMOST A MONTH AND I THOUGHT IT HAD BEEN FIXED. THIS IS THE SECOND TIME FOR THIS ISSUE TO OCCUR. I DO NOT IN ANYWAY FEEL SAFE IN THIS CAR. IT GOES BACK TO THE DEALERSHIP TO BE REPAIRED AGAIN AND I WANT IT PERMANENTLY FIXED. I DON'T KNOW THE EQUIPMENT DETAILS SO YOU'LL HAVE TO CHECK WITH NISSAN. I HAD TO PUT SOMETHING IN ORDER TO PROCEED WITH COMPLAINT. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10369096
25,000 miles · Oct 8, 2010
VisibilityInjury
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 NISSAN MURANO. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 60 MPH WHEN THE SUNROOF SUDDENLY EXPLODED AND SHATTERED. THE CONTACT DID NOT NOTICE AN ISSUE WITH THE SUNROOF BEFORE THE FAILURE. THE CONTACT WAS INJURED AND CUT FROM THE GLASS SHATTERING. THE VEHICLE WAS BEING REPAIRED BY AN AUTHORIZED DEALER. THE…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 NISSAN MURANO. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 60 MPH WHEN THE SUNROOF SUDDENLY EXPLODED AND SHATTERED. THE CONTACT DID NOT NOTICE AN ISSUE WITH THE SUNROOF BEFORE THE FAILURE. THE CONTACT WAS INJURED AND CUT FROM THE GLASS SHATTERING. THE VEHICLE WAS BEING REPAIRED BY AN AUTHORIZED DEALER. THE CONTACT CALLED THE MANUFACTURER WHO OFFERED NO ASSISTANCE. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 25,000.
NHTSA ODI #10359683
40,000 miles · Sep 27, 2010
Visibility
VEHICLE 2009 NISSAN MURANO MILEAGE 70,000 SAFETY ISSUE: HIGH SPEED WIPERS AND INTERMITTENT FRONT WINDSHIELD WIPERS DO NOT WORK ON EITHER MANUAL MODE OR AUTOMATIC RAIN SENSING MODE. ONE DEALER CAN NOT DIAGNOSE PROBLEM, BUT WANTS TO REPROGRAM COMPUTER @ $500 IN HOPES OF FIXING THE ISSUE. ANOTHER DEALER WANTS TO REPLACE WIN…
Read full complaint
VEHICLE 2009 NISSAN MURANO MILEAGE 70,000 SAFETY ISSUE: HIGH SPEED WIPERS AND INTERMITTENT FRONT WINDSHIELD WIPERS DO NOT WORK ON EITHER MANUAL MODE OR AUTOMATIC RAIN SENSING MODE. ONE DEALER CAN NOT DIAGNOSE PROBLEM, BUT WANTS TO REPROGRAM COMPUTER @ $500 IN HOPES OF FIXING THE ISSUE. ANOTHER DEALER WANTS TO REPLACE WINDSHIELD FOR $1,100 AS THEY BELIEVE THAT SOMETHING IN THE COMPOSITION OF THE WINDSHIELD IS INTERFERING WITH THE RAIN-SENSING SENSOR MONITORING SYSTEM. THIS IS A WELL CARED FOR VEHICLE UNDER A PROFESSIONAL FLEET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM. THIS VEHICLE IS AVAILABLE FOR USE BY SEVERAL EXECUTIVES AND TO HAVE AN INOPERABLE HIGH-SPEED WIPER FUNCTION IS A SERIOUS SAFETY ISSUE. NISSAN'S CORPORATE SAFETY RESPONSE TO THIS BASIC SAFETY ISSUE IS TO KEEP SENDING THE VEHICLE FOR MORE DIAGNOSIS BY THE DEALER, WHO WANTS TO START REPLACING PARTS AT THE OWNER'S EXPENSE AND TO NISSAN'S PROFIT IN HOPES OF FINDING A SOLUTION. ENGINEERING PROPERLY FUNCTIONING WINDSHIELD WIPERS ON A VEHICLE THAT COST $40,000 NEW SHOULD BE A BASIC SAFETY REQUIREMENT UPON THE MANUFACTURER THIS WIPER ISSUE HAS BEEN A LONG-TERM CHRONIC PROBLEM WITH THIS VEHICLE TO WHICH I ONLY RECENTLY BECAME AWARE. AN INTERNET SEARCH INDICATES OTHER NISSANS WITH RAIN-SENSING WIPERS ALSO HAVE THIS ISSUE. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10357903
52,000 miles · Aug 30, 2010
Steering
COLUMN 2009 NISSAN MURANO: THE STEERING COLUMN POWER ADJUSTMENT (TILT OR TELESCOPE) DOES NOT WORK OR MAKES ABNORMAL NOISE WHEN OPERATING THE SWITCH. *TR
Nissan of North America, Inc (Nissan) is recalling certain 2009 Murano vehicles. The valves within the ABS Hydraulic Control Units (HCU) may react with brake fluids containing specific corrosion preventative additives. This reaction may cause the valves to not close properly.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: If the valves do not properly close, additional brake pedal travel may be required to stop the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Nissan has notified owners, and dealers will flush the brake system with DOT 4 fluid. The HCU will then be tested to detect a possible stuck valve condition. If necessary, the HCU will be replaced, free of charge. The recall began February 7, 2019. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-867-7669.
NISSAN IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2008-2010 VEHICLES ORIGINALLY SOLD IN OR CURRENTLY REGISTERED IN THE STATES OF CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, IOWA, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, MASSACHUSETTS, MAINE, MARYLAND, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSOURI, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE ISLAND, VERMONT, WASHINGTON D.C., WEST VIRGINIA AND WISCONSIN. THE MATERIAL IN THE NUT USED TO SECURE THE SENSOR-TRANSMITTER OF THE TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEM (TPMS) MAY CORRODE AND POTENTIALLY CRACK IN AREAS WITH HEAVY CONCENTRATIONS OF ROAD SALT. IF THIS OCCURS, THE NUT MAY COME OUT OF THE SENSOR-TRANSMITTER AND THE TPMS LAMP WILL ILLUMINATE.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF THE TPMS LAMP IS DISREGARDED AND THE VEHICLE CONTINUES TO BE DRIVEN IN THIS CONDITION, THE TIRE WILL QUICKLY LOSE AIR PRESSURE AT A CONSISTENT RATE RESULTING IN A FLAT TIRE INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
Remedy: THE DEALER WILL REPLACE THE TPMS NUT WITH A NEW, MORE ROBUST NUT. THIS SERVICE WILL BE PERFORMED FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 9, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261 AND INFINITI AT 1-800-662-6200.
NISSAN IS RECALLING 204,361 MY 2007-2008 ALTIMA, ALTIMA HYBRID, 350Z, 350Z ROADSTER, MY 2008 ALTIMA COUPE, ROGUE, MY 2009 MURANO, AND INFINITI MY 2007-2008 G35 SEDAN, MY 2008 G37 COUPE AND EX35 PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS' OCCUPANT CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (OCS) CONTROL UNITS. A VARISTOR IN THE OCS CONTROL UNIT LOCATED IN THE PASSENGER SEAT CUSHION MAY HAVE BEEN MANUFACTURED OUT OF SPECIFICATION. UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS, THIS COULD CAUSE AN INTERRUPTION OF SIGNAL BETWEEN THE OCS AND THE AIR BAG CONTROL UNIT (ACU).
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THIS COULD RESULT IN THE PASSENGER AIR BAG BEING SUPPRESSED WHICH COULD FAIL TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL TEST THE SIGNAL BETWEEN THE OCS AND ACU SYSTEMS USING A SPECIAL TOOL TO CHECK THAT IT IS FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED. IF NECESSARY, THE SEAT CUSHION (CONTAINING OCS HARDWARE) WILL BE REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE MANUFACTURED TO SPECIFICATION. THE RECALL BEGAN ON NOVEMBER 4, 2008. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261 OR INFINITI AT 1-800-662-6200.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Electrical System:software
NISSAN IS RECALLING 204,361 MY 2007-2008 ALTIMA, ALTIMA HYBRID, 350Z, 350Z ROADSTER, MY 2008 ALTIMA COUPE, ROGUE, MY 2009 MURANO, AND INFINITI MY 2007-2008 G35 SEDAN, MY 2008 G37 COUPE AND EX35 PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS' OCCUPANT CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (OCS) CONTROL UNITS. A VARISTOR IN THE OCS CONTROL UNIT LOCATED IN THE PASSENGER SEAT CUSHION MAY HAVE BEEN MANUFACTURED OUT OF SPECIFICATION. UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS, THIS COULD CAUSE AN INTERRUPTION OF SIGNAL BETWEEN THE OCS AND THE AIR BAG CONTROL UNIT (ACU).
Consequence: THIS COULD RESULT IN THE PASSENGER AIR BAG BEING SUPPRESSED WHICH COULD FAIL TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL TEST THE SIGNAL BETWEEN THE OCS AND ACU SYSTEMS USING A SPECIAL TOOL TO CHECK THAT IT IS FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED. IF NECESSARY, THE SEAT CUSHION (CONTAINING OCS HARDWARE) WILL BE REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE MANUFACTURED TO SPECIFICATION. THE RECALL BEGAN ON NOVEMBER 4, 2008. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261 OR INFINITI AT 1-800-662-6200.
Air Bags
NISSAN IS RECALLING 204,361 MY 2007-2008 ALTIMA, ALTIMA HYBRID, 350Z, 350Z ROADSTER, MY 2008 ALTIMA COUPE, ROGUE, MY 2009 MURANO, AND INFINITI MY 2007-2008 G35 SEDAN, MY 2008 G37 COUPE AND EX35 PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS' OCCUPANT CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (OCS) CONTROL UNITS. A VARISTOR IN THE OCS CONTROL UNIT LOCATED IN THE PASSENGER SEAT CUSHION MAY HAVE BEEN MANUFACTURED OUT OF SPECIFICATION. UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS, THIS COULD CAUSE AN INTERRUPTION OF SIGNAL BETWEEN THE OCS AND THE AIR BAG CONTROL UNIT (ACU).
Consequence: THIS COULD RESULT IN THE PASSENGER AIR BAG BEING SUPPRESSED WHICH COULD FAIL TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL TEST THE SIGNAL BETWEEN THE OCS AND ACU SYSTEMS USING A SPECIAL TOOL TO CHECK THAT IT IS FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED. IF NECESSARY, THE SEAT CUSHION (CONTAINING OCS HARDWARE) WILL BE REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE MANUFACTURED TO SPECIFICATION. THE RECALL BEGAN ON NOVEMBER 4, 2008. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261 OR INFINITI AT 1-800-662-6200.
NISSAN IS RECALLING 16,365 MY 2008 INFINITI EX35 AND MY 2009 NISSAN MURANO VEHICLES. DUE TO INCORRECT SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING, THE AIR BAG CONTROL UNIT (ACU) MAY CAUSE THE PASSENGER AIR BAG NOT TO OPERATE AS DESIGNED IF THE VEHICLE BATTERY BECOMES SIGNIFICANTLY DISCHARGED.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THIS COULD RESULT IN THE PASSENGER AIR BAG NOT INFLATING IN A CRASH IN WHICH IT WAS DESIGNED TO DO SO, AND INCREASING THE RISK OF INJURY.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPROGRAM THE ACU IN AFFECTED VEHICLES. THE RECALL BEGAN ON FEBRUARY 19, 2008. OWNERS MAY CONTACT INFINITI AT 1-800-662-6200 OR NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
2
EA18001 · Extended Braking Distances
Opened Apr 18, 2018 · Closed Jan 17, 2023
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip
On April 18, 2018, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened Engineering Analysis (EA) 18-001 to investigate reports of braking concerns in model year (MY) 2009 Nissan Murano vehicles. A failure of the hydraulic control unit (HCU) portion of the antilock brake system (ABS), which involves improper operation of an internal hydraulic control valve(s), can cause extended brake pedal travel and may result in a reduction in overall braking effectiveness. Tier-one supplier Continental manufactured the HCU for Nissan.The corrosion-preventive, zinc coating used on the armatures of the normally closed (NC) valves within ABS HCU may react with brake fluids lacking sufficient corrosion-preventative additives. This reaction can cause the formation of a gelatinous material, which may cause the NC valves to close slowly. Over time, the gel can solidify to an extent such that the spring used to return the valve to the closed position may not be able to overcome the gel buildup, allowing the NC valve to remain open. If any of the four NC valves remains open, fluid will be diverted to one or two accumulator(s). This misdirected fluid has the net effect of causing brake pedal travel to increase, however enough stroke remains in the pedal to generate braking force. Although the hydraulic braking system remains intact and full braking force is maintained once the pedal travels the additional distance, when this condition occurs, the initial increase in brake pedal travel could result in increased stopping distance. An existing Nissan Service Campaign was launched for MY 2009 vehicles built prior to 11/1/2007. After consultation with ODI as part of EA18-001, Nissan decided to expand this population to the full range of MY2009 Murano vehicles. Later Murano vehicles exhibit significantly lower rates of malfunction.During this investigation 156 complaints were identified that related to the braking concern. Within the complainants 2 allege crashes with 4 injuries. The Nissan reports from investigation Information Request letter responses, were similar in content and identified 870 reports with 16 crashes and no injuries.On December 19, 2018, Nissan notified ODI it would conduct a safety recall (18V916) to remedy the ABS modules on certain MY 2009 Nissan Murano vehicles. The remedy procedure involves dealers flushing the brake system with DOT 4 fluid. The HCU will then be tested to detect a possible stuck valve condition. If necessary, the HCU will be replaced. The 2010-14 Murano SUVs outside the recall population and equipped with zinc-coated armatures will be inspected under a service campaign P0A08 using the same procedure as recall 18V916.Continental HCUs with a redesigned armature coating were phased into new vehicle production after December 2014 and do not appear to be experiencing corrosion. The recall action initiated by the manufacturer appears to address the safety risks of concern to ODI. Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exists on other model or MY vehicles outside of the recall scope. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For a complete summary of this investigation and related consumer complaints, please see attached closing resume document.
PE17002 · Extended Braking Distances
Opened May 3, 2017 · Closed May 4, 2018
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes; Service Brakes, Air:antilock; Service Brakes, Air:antilock:control Unit/module
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) is closing this Preliminary Evaluation and upgrading to an Engineering Analysis (EA) 18-001.During the PE, ODI requested and reviewed information provided by Nissan including consumer complaints and other field and technical data related to failures of the hydraulic control unit (HCU), an electro-mechanical brake system component that provides antilock braking and other functionality in the subject model year (MY) 2009 Murano.The subject failure of the HCU, which involves improper operation of an internal hydraulic control valve, can cause extended brake pedal travel and may result in a reduction in overall braking effectiveness.Tier-one supplier Continental manufactured the HCU for Nissan.ODI currently recognizes 484 subject vehicle complaints that appear related to the alleged defect.Fourteen crash allegations, with three non-life threatening injuries are under evaluation also.ODI has been monitoring consumer complaints received, and in some cases has obtained suspect HCUs from complainants' vehicles.Recovered HCUs sent to NHTSA's Vehicle Research and Test Center (VRTC) in East Liberty, Ohio are under evaluation, and VRTC has conducted limited vehicle testing also.In a July 28, 2017 submission, Nissan acknowledged that a failure of the HCU can result in increased brake pedal travel during braking.Nissan's analysis of returned parts revealed that a zinc coating used on the normally closed valve assemblies inside the HCU may react with certain brake fluid constituents.The reaction results in the formation of a gelatinous material that can harden with time and prevent the valve from closing after opening in an ABS event.When this occurs, Nissan maintains that the hydraulic brake system remains intact and that full braking is available once the pedal travels an additional distance, about 36 mm according to Nissan.Although still under investigation, Nissan states it has not determined the condition represents an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety, citing low rate and vehicle age as additional factors.In March 2018, Nissan began conducting a customer satisfaction campaign on certain MY 2009 Murano to service (flush and replace the brake fluid), and then test and replace the HCU as needed.The campaign is being conducted free of charge to customers.During the EA, ODI will request VRTC continue to evaluate the cause and consequence of HCU failures, including the affects of multi-valve failures.ODI will further study the potential scope of the alleged defect as it understands similar HCUs and brake fluid is used in other MY Muranos, and potentially in other Nissan models as well.ODI notes that improved valve coatings were introduced on Nissan HCUs at some subsequent stage.
Additional source detail variants (3)
Service Brakes, Air:antilock:control Unit/module
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) is closing this Preliminary Evaluation and upgrading to an Engineering Analysis (EA) 18-001.During the PE, ODI requested and reviewed information provided by Nissan including consumer complaints and other field and technical data related to failures of the hydraulic control unit (HCU), an electro-mechanical brake system component that provides antilock braking and other functionality in the subject model year (MY) 2009 Murano.The subject failure of the HCU, which involves improper operation of an internal hydraulic control valve, can cause extended brake pedal travel and may result in a reduction in overall braking effectiveness.Tier-one supplier Continental manufactured the HCU for Nissan.ODI currently recognizes 484 subject vehicle complaints that appear related to the alleged defect.Fourteen crash allegations, with three non-life threatening injuries are under evaluation also.ODI has been monitoring consumer complaints received, and in some cases has obtained suspect HCUs from complainants' vehicles.Recovered HCUs sent to NHTSA's Vehicle Research and Test Center (VRTC) in East Liberty, Ohio are under evaluation, and VRTC has conducted limited vehicle testing also.In a July 28, 2017 submission, Nissan acknowledged that a failure of the HCU can result in increased brake pedal travel during braking.Nissan's analysis of returned parts revealed that a zinc coating used on the normally closed valve assemblies inside the HCU may react with certain brake fluid constituents.The reaction results in the formation of a gelatinous material that can harden with time and prevent the valve from closing after opening in an ABS event.When this occurs, Nissan maintains that the hydraulic brake system remains intact and that full braking is available once the pedal travels an additional distance, about 36 mm according to Nissan.Although still under investigation, Nissan states it has not determined the condition represents an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety, citing low rate and vehicle age as additional factors.In March 2018, Nissan began conducting a customer satisfaction campaign on certain MY 2009 Murano to service (flush and replace the brake fluid), and then test and replace the HCU as needed.The campaign is being conducted free of charge to customers.During the EA, ODI will request VRTC continue to evaluate the cause and consequence of HCU failures, including the affects of multi-valve failures.ODI will further study the potential scope of the alleged defect as it understands similar HCUs and brake fluid is used in other MY Muranos, and potentially in other Nissan models as well.ODI notes that improved valve coatings were introduced on Nissan HCUs at some subsequent stage.
Service Brakes, Air:antilock
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) is closing this Preliminary Evaluation and upgrading to an Engineering Analysis (EA) 18-001.During the PE, ODI requested and reviewed information provided by Nissan including consumer complaints and other field and technical data related to failures of the hydraulic control unit (HCU), an electro-mechanical brake system component that provides antilock braking and other functionality in the subject model year (MY) 2009 Murano.The subject failure of the HCU, which involves improper operation of an internal hydraulic control valve, can cause extended brake pedal travel and may result in a reduction in overall braking effectiveness.Tier-one supplier Continental manufactured the HCU for Nissan.ODI currently recognizes 484 subject vehicle complaints that appear related to the alleged defect.Fourteen crash allegations, with three non-life threatening injuries are under evaluation also.ODI has been monitoring consumer complaints received, and in some cases has obtained suspect HCUs from complainants' vehicles.Recovered HCUs sent to NHTSA's Vehicle Research and Test Center (VRTC) in East Liberty, Ohio are under evaluation, and VRTC has conducted limited vehicle testing also.In a July 28, 2017 submission, Nissan acknowledged that a failure of the HCU can result in increased brake pedal travel during braking.Nissan's analysis of returned parts revealed that a zinc coating used on the normally closed valve assemblies inside the HCU may react with certain brake fluid constituents.The reaction results in the formation of a gelatinous material that can harden with time and prevent the valve from closing after opening in an ABS event.When this occurs, Nissan maintains that the hydraulic brake system remains intact and that full braking is available once the pedal travels an additional distance, about 36 mm according to Nissan.Although still under investigation, Nissan states it has not determined the condition represents an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety, citing low rate and vehicle age as additional factors.In March 2018, Nissan began conducting a customer satisfaction campaign on certain MY 2009 Murano to service (flush and replace the brake fluid), and then test and replace the HCU as needed.The campaign is being conducted free of charge to customers.During the EA, ODI will request VRTC continue to evaluate the cause and consequence of HCU failures, including the affects of multi-valve failures.ODI will further study the potential scope of the alleged defect as it understands similar HCUs and brake fluid is used in other MY Muranos, and potentially in other Nissan models as well.ODI notes that improved valve coatings were introduced on Nissan HCUs at some subsequent stage.
Service Brakes
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) is closing this Preliminary Evaluation and upgrading to an Engineering Analysis (EA) 18-001.During the PE, ODI requested and reviewed information provided by Nissan including consumer complaints and other field and technical data related to failures of the hydraulic control unit (HCU), an electro-mechanical brake system component that provides antilock braking and other functionality in the subject model year (MY) 2009 Murano.The subject failure of the HCU, which involves improper operation of an internal hydraulic control valve, can cause extended brake pedal travel and may result in a reduction in overall braking effectiveness.Tier-one supplier Continental manufactured the HCU for Nissan.ODI currently recognizes 484 subject vehicle complaints that appear related to the alleged defect.Fourteen crash allegations, with three non-life threatening injuries are under evaluation also.ODI has been monitoring consumer complaints received, and in some cases has obtained suspect HCUs from complainants' vehicles.Recovered HCUs sent to NHTSA's Vehicle Research and Test Center (VRTC) in East Liberty, Ohio are under evaluation, and VRTC has conducted limited vehicle testing also.In a July 28, 2017 submission, Nissan acknowledged that a failure of the HCU can result in increased brake pedal travel during braking.Nissan's analysis of returned parts revealed that a zinc coating used on the normally closed valve assemblies inside the HCU may react with certain brake fluid constituents.The reaction results in the formation of a gelatinous material that can harden with time and prevent the valve from closing after opening in an ABS event.When this occurs, Nissan maintains that the hydraulic brake system remains intact and that full braking is available once the pedal travels an additional distance, about 36 mm according to Nissan.Although still under investigation, Nissan states it has not determined the condition represents an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety, citing low rate and vehicle age as additional factors.In March 2018, Nissan began conducting a customer satisfaction campaign on certain MY 2009 Murano to service (flush and replace the brake fluid), and then test and replace the HCU as needed.The campaign is being conducted free of charge to customers.During the EA, ODI will request VRTC continue to evaluate the cause and consequence of HCU failures, including the affects of multi-valve failures.ODI will further study the potential scope of the alleged defect as it understands similar HCUs and brake fluid is used in other MY Muranos, and potentially in other Nissan models as well.ODI notes that improved valve coatings were introduced on Nissan HCUs at some subsequent stage.
2009 Nissan Murano Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year
Illustration