← New search

2000 Mitsubishi Montero

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2000 Mitsubishi Montero do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 20.5.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Montero years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

Limited mileage data: 5 of 51 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 7 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Structure. Review the 7 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 6 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

8 crash reports1 fire reports5 injury reports

What owners actually said

51 reports
Mileage unknown · Jun 24, 2001
Suspension

THE VEHICLE WAS SOLD WITH INADEQUATE REAR COIL SUSPENSION RESULTING IN THE VEHICLE "BOTTOMING OUT" WITH REAR PASSENGERS. THE VEHICLE WAS REPRESENTED TO BE ABLE TO TOW 5000#. BUT DUE TO THE IMPROPER SUSPENSION, TOWING ANYTHING IS DANGEROUS AS A RESULT OF THE INABILITY OF THE SUSPENSION TO ACCOMMODATE MINIMAL TONGUE WEIGHT. S…

Read full complaint

THE VEHICLE WAS SOLD WITH INADEQUATE REAR COIL SUSPENSION RESULTING IN THE VEHICLE "BOTTOMING OUT" WITH REAR PASSENGERS. THE VEHICLE WAS REPRESENTED TO BE ABLE TO TOW 5000#. BUT DUE TO THE IMPROPER SUSPENSION, TOWING ANYTHING IS DANGEROUS AS A RESULT OF THE INABILITY OF THE SUSPENSION TO ACCOMMODATE MINIMAL TONGUE WEIGHT. SUPPOSED REPAIR DID NOT FIX THE PROBLEM. A CUSHION WAS INSTALLED RATHER THAN INCREASING THE COIL STRENGTH OR OTHERWISE "REPAIRING" THE PROBLEM. THE CUSHION MERELY ATTEMPTS TO "MASK" THE INADEQUATE SUSPENSION AND DOES NOT RESOLVE ANYTHING.

NHTSA ODI #747306

Mileage unknown · Apr 25, 2001
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

VEHICLE WAS RIDING SLUGGISH, BUT BRAKING DISTANCE WAS FINE. DEALER REPLACED BRAKE PADS THAT WERE WORN OUT. CONSUMER BELIEVED BRAKE WERE STICKING. CURRENTLY, VEHICLE'S PERFORMANCE IS BETTER.*AK CONSUMER WAS ADVISED THAT UNEVEN BRAKE WEAR IS NORMAL. *JB

NHTSA ODI #886734

Mileage unknown · Mar 14, 2001
Engine And Engine CoolingVisibility

WHILE DRIVING HEARD NOISE COMING FROM ENGINE. THEN, TOOK VEHICLE TO DEALER, THEY FOUND ENGINE BLOCK WAS CRACKED. ALSO, DISCOVERED THAT HEATER CORE SEPARATED. TOOK VEHICLE BACK TO DEALER FOR TWO OTHER PROBLEMS.*AK THE VEHICLE WAS RETURNED TO THE CONSUMER WITHOUT PROPERLY REPAIRING. WHILE DRIVING, THE CRANK SHAFT FELL OFF AN…

Read full complaint

WHILE DRIVING HEARD NOISE COMING FROM ENGINE. THEN, TOOK VEHICLE TO DEALER, THEY FOUND ENGINE BLOCK WAS CRACKED. ALSO, DISCOVERED THAT HEATER CORE SEPARATED. TOOK VEHICLE BACK TO DEALER FOR TWO OTHER PROBLEMS.*AK THE VEHICLE WAS RETURNED TO THE CONSUMER WITHOUT PROPERLY REPAIRING. WHILE DRIVING, THE CRANK SHAFT FELL OFF AND THE CONUMER LOST CONTROL OF VEHICLE. *YH

NHTSA ODI #883074

Mileage unknown · Mar 9, 2001
Suspension

VEHICLE DOES NOT STAY IN ALIGNMENT, CAUSING EXCESSIVE WEAR ON TIRES. CAUSE IS UNKNOWN.*AK

NHTSA ODI #882631

Mileage unknown · Feb 27, 2001
Fuel System, GasolinePower TrainUnknown Or Other

TOOK MY TRUCK BACK TO THE DEALER ON 2/22/01 FOR ENGINE LIGHT THAT CAME ON. THEY REPLACED A LEAKY FUEL CAP AND ENGINE LIGHT WENT OFF. TOLD THEM WHEN I CALL FOR SERVICE ABOUT THE 2ND -3RD SHIFT THAT WAS SLIPPING IN THE TRANSMISSION. THE COULD NOT FIND WHAT I WAS SPEAKING OF THE FIRST TIME. THE SECOND TIME I TOOK IT BACK FOR TH…

Read full complaint

TOOK MY TRUCK BACK TO THE DEALER ON 2/22/01 FOR ENGINE LIGHT THAT CAME ON. THEY REPLACED A LEAKY FUEL CAP AND ENGINE LIGHT WENT OFF. TOLD THEM WHEN I CALL FOR SERVICE ABOUT THE 2ND -3RD SHIFT THAT WAS SLIPPING IN THE TRANSMISSION. THE COULD NOT FIND WHAT I WAS SPEAKING OF THE FIRST TIME. THE SECOND TIME I TOOK IT BACK FOR THE SAME REASON THEY THEN SAID THAT MITSUBISHI HAD A LETTER STATING THAT THERE WAS A PROBLEM WITH THE 2ND - 3RD SHIFT. THE CALLED THE TECH LINE AND NO ONE NEW WHAT TO DO WITH THE VEHICLE. THEY IN TURN WANTED ME TO PAY FOR A TRANNY FLUSH, I REFUSED TELLING THEM I HAD BEEN INSTRUCTED BY A MECHANIC FRIEND THAT THIS IS NOT THE PROBLEM, SO I DID NOT HAVE THAT DONE. TO BOOT THEY WANTED ME TO PAY FOR THIS (80.00).!! WHEN I CALLED AGAIN ABOUT MY VECHICLE DOING THE SAME THING I TOLD THEM I DID NOT FEEL THE VEHICLE WAS SAFE TO DRIVE BECAUSE DRIVING A DAMAGED TRANSMISSION WAS NOT GOOD, THE TOLD ME THAT I WAS IN NO DANGER. THE THIRD TIME, THEY INSTRUCTED ME MITSUBISHI COULD DO NOTHING ELSE TO HELP ME AND I HAD TO PICK UP THE VEHICLE IMMEDIATELY. SO NOW I AM DRIVING A POSSIBLE DAMAGED TRANSMISSION AND WHO KNOWS WHAT ELSE WILL HAPPEN. I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST AND INVESTIGATION INTO THIS, THE MECHANIC AT THE DEALERSHIP TOLD ME OTHER VEHICLES(MONTERO'S) HAVE BEEN DOING THE SAME THING AS WELL NOT JUST MINE. I BELIEVE THIS IS MITSUBISHI'S RESPONSIBLITY TO FIX THIS EVEN IF IT MEANS A NEW TRANSMISSION!! IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO TALK FURTHER ON THIS PROBLEM PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME AT THE GIVEN NUMBERS. THANKS AND HAVE A GREAT DAY. --- CONCERNED CONSUMER

NHTSA ODI #741600

Mileage unknown · Oct 20, 2000
Engine And Engine CoolingCrash

IN FEBRUARY, 2000, I HAD PULLED UP UNDERNEATH MY HOME. THE CAR WAS IN PARK WHEN THE MOTOR EXCELLED. I THOUGHT SOMETHING MUST BE WRONG WITH THE TIMING. I TURNED OFF THE CAR. I DIDN'T THINK ANY MORE ABOUT IT UNTIL 9-20-2000 WHEN THE ENGINE DID IT AGAIN. I WAS PICKING MY CHILD UP FROM FOOTBALL PRACTICE I PULLED INTO A PARKING…

Read full complaint

IN FEBRUARY, 2000, I HAD PULLED UP UNDERNEATH MY HOME. THE CAR WAS IN PARK WHEN THE MOTOR EXCELLED. I THOUGHT SOMETHING MUST BE WRONG WITH THE TIMING. I TURNED OFF THE CAR. I DIDN'T THINK ANY MORE ABOUT IT UNTIL 9-20-2000 WHEN THE ENGINE DID IT AGAIN. I WAS PICKING MY CHILD UP FROM FOOTBALL PRACTICE I PULLED INTO A PARKING PLACE. THE SPACES ARE CLOSE TOGETHER AND YOU GO INTO THE PARKING AREA WITH YOUR FOOT ON THE BRAKE. I HAD PULLED STRAIGHT UP IN THE SPACE AND WAS GETTING READY TO PUT IT IN PARK WHEN THE MOTOR EXCELLED AGAIN. I BRAKED AS HARD AS I COULD BUT THE CAR WOULD NOT STOP. I DID NOT HAVE MY FOOT ON THE GAS AS MITSUBISHI HAS SUGGESTED I MIGHT HAVE DONE. I RAN OVER A METAL FENCE. I WAS HEADED TOWARD A BLEACHER WHEN I DID A 90 DEGREE TURN AND HEADED DOWN A PATH. THE ONLY THING THAT WAS WORKING WAS THE STEERING. I HEARD A CLICK AND THE MOTOR DIED DOWN AND I WAS ABLE TO STOP THE CAR. I HAVE A NUMBER OF WITNESSES WHO SAW ME PULL IN. I HAVE A VERY GOOD DRIVING RECORD AND I AM 49 YEARS OLD. BY THE POLICE SUGGESTIONS I HAD THE VECHILDE TOWED TO A TOWING PLACE UNTIL I COULD CONTACT MY INSURANCE COMPANY. I CONTACTED LIBERTY MUTUAL. I ASKED THEM TO HAVE THE CAR INSPECTED BEFORE THEY TOWED IT TO MITSUBISHI DEALERSHIP IN CHARLESTON.THEY WERE ON AN OFF ABOUT THIS FOR SEVERAL DAYS THEN THEY SAID IT HAD TO GO TO THE DEALERSHIP, THAT THEY DID NOT HAVE A PLACE THAT COULD CHECK IT OUT. IT WAS TOWED TO THE DEALERSHIP AND THEY WENT OVER IT. I WAS TOLD BY THE MANAGER IT COULD BE MANY THINGS BUT WHEN THEY CHECKED IT OUT, EVERYTHING WAS OKAY. THE MANGER SAID IT COULD BE AIR FLOW FROM THE COMPUTER THAT IS SHOT INTO DIFFFERENT SYSYTEMS, BUT THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE. LIBERTY MUTUAL THEN SENT SOMEONE OUT. WHY THEY DIDN'T DO THIS BEFORE, I DON'T KNOW. THEIR ENGINEER LOOKED OVER EVERYTHING WITH MITSUBISHI AND GUESS WHAT NOTHING IS WRONG WITH IT. WRONG! 7 MONTHS BETWEEN THE INCIDENCES. WHEN WILL BE THE NEXT TIME??? MITSUBISHI SAYS I HAVE TO TAKE A LEASED CAR BAC

NHTSA ODI #734806

Mileage unknown · Oct 6, 2000
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

ABS LIGHT COMES ON PERIODICALLY, BUT THE PROBLEM IS INTERMITTENT. PUSHING ON THE BRAKES, IT FEELS LIKE A DELAY RESPONSE IN THE BRAKES. CONSUMER WILL CONTACT THE DEALER.*AK

NHTSA ODI #872486

Mileage unknown · Sep 20, 2000
Vehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

RENTED VEHICLE. SPEED CONTROL LOCKED UP AT 60MPH. DRIVER SWERVED, AND VEHICLE ROLLED OVER, RESULTING IN INJURIES. VEHICLE WAS TOTALLED. *AK

NHTSA ODI #871052

Mileage unknown · Sep 18, 2000
Suspension

WHILE DRIVING FROM 35 MPH AND UP THERE IS VIBRATION COMING FROM THE FRONT END. VEHICLE HAS BEEN TAKEN BACK TO THE DEALERSHIP SEVEN TIMES IN THE LAST TEN MONTHS FOR THIS PROBLEM. DEALERSHIP HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO CORRECT OR FIGURE OUT WHAT WAS CAUSING THE PROBLEM. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION.*AK

NHTSA ODI #870806

Mileage unknown · Sep 8, 2000
Fuel System, Gasoline

EVERY TIME WE REFUEL A GASOLINE ODOR PERSISTS INSIDE THE VEHICLE. WE DO NOT "TOP OFF" THE TANK AND WE ARE CAREFUL TO AVOID GETTING FUEL ON OUR SHOES/CLOTHING.

NHTSA ODI #730748

Official recalls

2

20V035000 · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module

Jan 23, 2020

Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. (MMNA) is recalling certain 1998-2000 Montero vehicles. These vehicles were equipped with Non-Azide Driver air bag Inflators (NADI) and do not contain phase stabilized ammonium nitrate (PSAN) propellant. Due to a manufacturing issue, the NADI inflators may absorb moisture, causing the inflators to rupture or the air bag cushion to underinflate.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: In the event of a crash necessitating air bag deployment, an inflator rupture may result in metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants. An underinflated air bag may not properly protect the occupant. These scenarios increase the risk of serious injury or death.

Remedy: MMNA will notify owners, and dealers will replace the air bag inflator, free of charge. The recall began February 25, 2021. Owners may contact MMNA customer service at 1-888-648-7820. MMNA's number for this recall is SR-20-001.

04V428000 · Equipment:other:labels

Sep 1, 2004

CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 208, 'OCCUPANT CRASH PROTECTION.' THE BILINGUAL ENGLISH/SPANISH REMOVABLE AIR BAG WARNING LABELS AFFIXED TO THE DASH AND TO THE SUNVISOR DO NOT MEET THE SIZE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARD.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: THIS DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARD.

Remedy: MITSUBISHI CARIBBEAN WILL MAIL A CUSTOMER NOTIFICATION LETTER CONTAINING A WRITTEN DESCRIPTION AND A GRAPHIC OF THE BI-LINGUAL DASHBOARD AIR BAG WARNING LABEL. IN ADDITION, ALL CURRENT 2000-2004 NATIVA OWNERS WILL ALSO RECEIVE REPLACEMENT AIR BAG ALERT LABELS FOR THE SUN VISORS. THIS RECALL IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN DURING MARCH OR APRIL 2005. THE NOTIFICATION TO THE NATIVA OWNERS IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN DURING APRIL OR MAY 2005. OWNERS SHOULD CONTACT MITSUBISHI CARIBBEAN AT 1-787-251-8715.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

0

No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.