Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
340–25K
1325–50K
1150–75K
575–100K
12100–150K
2150K+
77 reports with mileage · 19 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
Tires. Review the 23 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Structure. Review the 18 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Vehicle Speed Control. Review the 13 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
6 crash reports0 fire reports1 injury reports
What owners actually said
96 reports
55,000 miles · May 14, 2012
Visibility
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING 70 MPH WHEN THE CONTACT REACHED FOR THE SUN VISOR AND THE MIRROR THAT WAS ATTACHED TO THE SUN VISOR FELL IN HER LAP. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE THE DRIVER SIDE SUN VISOR MIRROR WAS REPAIRED. THE PASSENGER SIDE MIRROR DETACHED FROM THE PASS…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING 70 MPH WHEN THE CONTACT REACHED FOR THE SUN VISOR AND THE MIRROR THAT WAS ATTACHED TO THE SUN VISOR FELL IN HER LAP. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE THE DRIVER SIDE SUN VISOR MIRROR WAS REPAIRED. THE PASSENGER SIDE MIRROR DETACHED FROM THE PASSENGER SIDE SUN VISOR SIX WEEKS AFTER THE REPAIRS TO THE PASSENGER SIDE SUN VISOR. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 55000. UPDATED 06/05/12*LJ THE CONSUMER STATED IT WAS THIRD OCCURRENCE. UPDATED 06/06/2012*JS
NHTSA ODI #10458338
37,423 miles · Mar 28, 2012
Structure
THE CAR HAD LESS THAN 38,000 MILES, IT HAD JUST PAST THE WARRANTY PERIOD AND THE PAINT STARTED BLISTERING ON THE TOP, TRUNK AND HOOD. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10453373
Mileage unknown · Feb 24, 2012
Structure
PAINT BEGAN PEELING ON THE REAR DECK LID. THEN WE NOTICED THE ROOF STARTED TOO. THEN THE HOOD. SINCE WRITING MY LETTER TO FORD MOTOR COMPANY, THE PROBLEM HAS GOTTEN WORSE. THIS VEHICLE ONLY HAD 52,000 MILES ON IT WHEN THIS STARTED AND THEY HAVE DENIED ANY RELIEF. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10449235
20,000 miles · Feb 21, 2012
Power TrainService Brakes, Hydraulic
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 35 MPH, THE VEHICLE SURGED FORWARD UNTIL HEAVY PRESSURE WAS APPLIED TO THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN DIRECTLY TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER AND THE TRANSMISSION LINKAGE WAS REPAIRED. APPROXIMATELY THREE YEARS LATER, THE CONTACT WAS …
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 35 MPH, THE VEHICLE SURGED FORWARD UNTIL HEAVY PRESSURE WAS APPLIED TO THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN DIRECTLY TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER AND THE TRANSMISSION LINKAGE WAS REPAIRED. APPROXIMATELY THREE YEARS LATER, THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT THE MASTER CYLINDER WAS LEAKING DURING A ROUTINE INSPECTION. THE INSPECTION WAS BEING PERFORMED BY AN AUTHORIZED DEALER. THE DEALER REPLACED THE MASTER CYLINDER. APPROXIMATELY TWO YEARS AFTER THE MASTER CYLINDER FAILURE, THE CONTACT EXPERIENCED A COMPLETE BRAKING LOSS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 40 MPH, HE APPLIED THE BRAKE PEDAL AND THE PEDAL DEPRESSED TO THE FLOOR. THE CONTACT WAS ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY COAST TO A STOP. THE CONTACT ADDED BRAKE FLUID TO THE VEHICLE AND TOWED IT TO AN INDEPENDENT REPAIR SHOP. THE MASTER CYLINDER WAS REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 20,000.
NHTSA ODI #10448798
26,093 miles · Jan 9, 2012
Vehicle Speed ControlCrash
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT ACCELERATE FROM A STOP. THE CONTACT THEN SHIFTED INTO REVERSE AND THE VEHICLE SURGED BACKWARD UNTIL CRASHING INTO A CONCRETE POST. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED HOME. THE FAILURE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE A…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT ACCELERATE FROM A STOP. THE CONTACT THEN SHIFTED INTO REVERSE AND THE VEHICLE SURGED BACKWARD UNTIL CRASHING INTO A CONCRETE POST. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED HOME. THE FAILURE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 26,093.
NHTSA ODI #10442878
Mileage unknown · Oct 7, 2011
Vehicle Speed Control
SPEED CONTROL IS NOT WORKING CORRECTLY. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10429062
40,000 miles · Sep 29, 2011
Structure
PAINT PEELING REAR BUMPER. *TT
NHTSA ODI #10427841
98,000 miles · Aug 3, 2011
Structure
PAINT IS BLISTERING OFF THE ROOF. *KB
NHTSA ODI #10416931
Mileage unknown · Jun 1, 2011
Engine And Engine CoolingPower Train
2007 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. CONSUMER STATES DEFECT WITH COMPUTER/POWER TRAIN CONTROL MODULE *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED WHEN HIS WIFE ATTEMPTED TO APPLY THE BRAKE ON TWO SEPARATE OCCASIONS, THE VEHICLE FAILED TO REDUCE ITS SPEED. CONSEQUENTLY, HIS WIFE WENT THROUGH THE RED LIGHT. THE CONSUMER TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER FOR AN…
Read full complaint
2007 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. CONSUMER STATES DEFECT WITH COMPUTER/POWER TRAIN CONTROL MODULE *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED WHEN HIS WIFE ATTEMPTED TO APPLY THE BRAKE ON TWO SEPARATE OCCASIONS, THE VEHICLE FAILED TO REDUCE ITS SPEED. CONSEQUENTLY, HIS WIFE WENT THROUGH THE RED LIGHT. THE CONSUMER TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER FOR AN INSPECTION. THE DEALER ASKED THE CONSUMER DID THE VEHICLE HAVE ADJUSTABLE PEDALS AND WHEN THE CONSUMER STATED IT DID, THE DEALER SUGGESTED THAT MAYBE HIS WIFE PUT HER FOOT ON BOTH PEDALS SIMULTANEOUSLY. THE CONSUMER ALSO STATED THERE WAS MESSAGE ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL IN FRENCH. WHEN HE LOOKED AT THE OWNERS MANUAL, IT MEANT CHANGE OIL. THE CONSUMER BELIEVED THE MESSAGE IN FRENCH, INSTEAD OF ENGLISH EFFECTED THE COMPUTER SYSTEM.*JB THE CONSUMER STATED THE INCIDENT HAS SINCE HAPPENED FOR A THIRD TIME. WHEN THE CONSUMERS WIFE PULLED INTO A PARKING SPOT, SHE PUT THE GEAR IN PARK AND TURNED OFF THE IGNITION. HOWEVER, THE VEHICLE CONTINUED TO MOVE EVEN THOUGH THE VEHICLE WAS IN PARK AND WHEN SHE STEPPED ON THE BRAKE THE VEHICLE DID NOT STOP. SHE IMMEDIATELY ENGAGED THE EMERGENCY BRAKE AND THE VEHICLE STOPPED. SHE TRIED TO RESTART THE VEHICLE, BUT IT WOULD NOT START. THE CONSUMER STATED WHEN HE ARRIVED TO HIS WIFE'S DESTINATION, THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT START WHEN IT WAS IN PARK. HOWEVER, ALL OF THE LIGHTS AND THE DASHBOARD LIGHTS WORKED. WHEN THE KEY WAS IN THE ON POSITION, HE COULD FREELY MOVE THE GEAR SHIFT INDICATOR BETWEEN GEARS, BUT THERE WAS NO FEEL THAT THE GEAR INDICATOR WAS IN ANY GEAR. UPDATED 06/14/11
NHTSA ODI #10404792
63,000 miles · Apr 21, 2011
Structure
NORMAL DRIVING FAILURE STARTED WITH PAINT PEALING OFF AND CONTINUING NOTHING HAS BEEN AS YET TO CORRECT PROBLEM. *TR
Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2005-2011 Ford Crown Victoria, 2005-2011 Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles manufactured March 23, 2004, to August 30, 2011, and 2005-2011 Lincoln Town Car vehicles manufactured March 8, 2004, to August 30, 2011, and on which the upper intermediate shaft was serviced during the course of safety recall 13V-385. The prior repairs may not have been correctly performed.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: Improper servicing of the upper intermediate shaft could cause the shaft to separate, which can then result in a loss of steering control, and increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Ford will notify the owners of vehicles whose repair records reflect that the upper intermediate steering shaft was repaired during the course of the prior recall 13V-385. Dealers will inspect and replace the upper immediate shaft if necessary free of charge. The recall began November 17, 2014. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 14S25.
Ford is recalling certain model year 2005-2011 Ford Crown Victoria (including Crown Victoria Police Interceptors), Mercury Grand Marquis, and Lincoln Town Car vehicles. The affected vehicles are currently registered or were originally sold in Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Severe corrosion can seize the lower intermediate shaft which may cause the upper intermediate shaft to collapse and the steering column lower bearing to separate.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: If the lower bearing separates, the vehicle may experience a loss of steering, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Ford will notify owners and dealers will replace the lower intermediate shaft, free of charge. The upper intermediate shaft and steering column lower bearing will be inspected to identify any damage that may have occurred as a result of lower intermediate shaft corrosion, and repaired or replaced as necessary. If the steering column lower bearing has separated, a retainer clip will be installed. The recall began on October 23, 2013. Owners may contact Ford at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's recall number is 13S08.
CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 212, 'WINDSHIELD MOUNTING.' THE WINDSHIELD MAY NOT BE PROPERLY SECURED TO THE VEHICLE BODY.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF THE WINDSHIELD IS NOT PROPERLY RETAINED TO THE VEHICLE, WIND NOISE, SQUEAK/RATTLES AND/OR WATER LEAKS MAY OCCUR. ALSO, LOSS OF WINDSHIELD RETENTION MAY REDUCE OCCUPANT PROTECTION IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE WINDSHIELD FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON NOVEMBER 22, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-800-392-3673.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
2
PE14021 · Steering Column Shaft Obstruction
Opened Jul 7, 2014 · Closed Nov 21, 2014
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Engine And Engine Cooling:exhaust System; Steering
On July 7, 2014 the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a preliminary evaluation based on five complaints (VOQs) alleging incidents ofinterference between dislodged exhaust manifold heat shields and the lower steering shaft/knuckle, including one alleging the interference resulted in a crash on a highway entrance ramp. Since opening this investigation, ODI has received four additional owner complaints.One indicated that the shield was removed before binding could occur.The other three occurred at low speed and produced some momentary steering binding that was overcome by the driver when additional steering effort was applied.Once the shield was repaired or removed, the steering returned to normal.The single incident ODI identified as a possible crash (VOQ No. 10578715) related to this condition could not be verified and the description of the crash in the complaint was not supported by the police accident report.No additional crash allegations have been identified related to the alleged defect condition.Information provided by Ford in its September 10, 2014 response to ODI's information request letter identified 10 additional incidents resulting in a low rate of 1.6 incidents per 100,000 vehicles sold in vehicles ranging from 7 to 11 years in service.Six of these incidents were reported by a single source, a state police fleet that corrected the problems in March 2011 and has not reported any additional failures since.Ford also reported 5 warranty claims, but these incidents occurred at very low mileages and appeared to be caused by loose or missing heat shield attachment hardware rather than the corrosion condition that was the cause of the more recent incidents and the focus of this investigation.This investigation is closed. The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The Agency will continue to monitor complaints and other information relating to the alleged defect in the subject vehicles and take further action in the future if warranted.The following VOQs are associated with this investigation:10643753, 10615584, 10611362, 10610451, 10578715, 10479681, 10471833, 10317493.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Engine And Engine Cooling:exhaust System
On July 7, 2014 the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a preliminary evaluation based on five complaints (VOQs) alleging incidents ofinterference between dislodged exhaust manifold heat shields and the lower steering shaft/knuckle, including one alleging the interference resulted in a crash on a highway entrance ramp. Since opening this investigation, ODI has received four additional owner complaints.One indicated that the shield was removed before binding could occur.The other three occurred at low speed and produced some momentary steering binding that was overcome by the driver when additional steering effort was applied.Once the shield was repaired or removed, the steering returned to normal.The single incident ODI identified as a possible crash (VOQ No. 10578715) related to this condition could not be verified and the description of the crash in the complaint was not supported by the police accident report.No additional crash allegations have been identified related to the alleged defect condition.Information provided by Ford in its September 10, 2014 response to ODI's information request letter identified 10 additional incidents resulting in a low rate of 1.6 incidents per 100,000 vehicles sold in vehicles ranging from 7 to 11 years in service.Six of these incidents were reported by a single source, a state police fleet that corrected the problems in March 2011 and has not reported any additional failures since.Ford also reported 5 warranty claims, but these incidents occurred at very low mileages and appeared to be caused by loose or missing heat shield attachment hardware rather than the corrosion condition that was the cause of the more recent incidents and the focus of this investigation.This investigation is closed. The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The Agency will continue to monitor complaints and other information relating to the alleged defect in the subject vehicles and take further action in the future if warranted.The following VOQs are associated with this investigation:10643753, 10615584, 10611362, 10610451, 10578715, 10479681, 10471833, 10317493.
Steering
On July 7, 2014 the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a preliminary evaluation based on five complaints (VOQs) alleging incidents ofinterference between dislodged exhaust manifold heat shields and the lower steering shaft/knuckle, including one alleging the interference resulted in a crash on a highway entrance ramp. Since opening this investigation, ODI has received four additional owner complaints.One indicated that the shield was removed before binding could occur.The other three occurred at low speed and produced some momentary steering binding that was overcome by the driver when additional steering effort was applied.Once the shield was repaired or removed, the steering returned to normal.The single incident ODI identified as a possible crash (VOQ No. 10578715) related to this condition could not be verified and the description of the crash in the complaint was not supported by the police accident report.No additional crash allegations have been identified related to the alleged defect condition.Information provided by Ford in its September 10, 2014 response to ODI's information request letter identified 10 additional incidents resulting in a low rate of 1.6 incidents per 100,000 vehicles sold in vehicles ranging from 7 to 11 years in service.Six of these incidents were reported by a single source, a state police fleet that corrected the problems in March 2011 and has not reported any additional failures since.Ford also reported 5 warranty claims, but these incidents occurred at very low mileages and appeared to be caused by loose or missing heat shield attachment hardware rather than the corrosion condition that was the cause of the more recent incidents and the focus of this investigation.This investigation is closed. The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The Agency will continue to monitor complaints and other information relating to the alleged defect in the subject vehicles and take further action in the future if warranted.The following VOQs are associated with this investigation:10643753, 10615584, 10611362, 10610451, 10578715, 10479681, 10471833, 10317493.
PE08060 · Tire Valve Cracking
Opened Oct 14, 2008 · Closed Apr 9, 2009
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Tires:valve
ON OCTOBER 14, 2008, ODI OPENED PE08-060 TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF CRACKED AND LEAKING SNAP-IN TIRE VALVES IN MODEL YEAR (MY) 2007 VEHICLES MANUFACTURED BY FORD MOTOR COMPANY.THE VALVES WERE SUPPLIED TO FORD BY TOPSEAL AUTO-PARTS, A SUBSIDIARY OF THE SHANGHAI BAOLONG AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION IN CHINA.VALVES MADE BY TOPSEAL FOR AFTERMARKET SALE WERE THE SUBJECT OF TWO RECENT SAFETY RECALLS BY TECH INTERNATIONAL (08T-018) AND DILL AIR CONTROLS (08T-028), THE LATTER OF WHICH WAS INVESTIGATED BY ODI IN PE08-036 AND EA08-022.THE DEFECT CONDITIONS ADDRESSED BY THE AFTERMARKET TIRE VALVE RECALLS BOTH INVOLVED INADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO OZONE CRACKING DUE TO ISSUES WITH THE SUPPLY OF ANTI-OZONANT CHEMICALS TO TOPSEAL FOR A PERIOD FROM JULY TO MID-NOVEMBER 2006.THE AFTERMARKET VALVES WERE COMPOUNDED WITH A BLEND OF EPDM AND NATURAL RUBBER, USING A RELATIVELY LOW PERCENTAGE OF EPDM (EPDM PROVIDES INHERENT RESISTANCE TO OZONE CRACKING).HENCE, THE NEED FOR ANTI-OZONANT CHEMICALS AND THE PROBLEMS WITH CRACKING WHEN THOSE CHEMICALS WERE MISSING OR OUT OF SPECIFICATION IN SOME LOTS OF VALVES.BOTH RECALL CAMPAIGNS INVOLVED INSPECTION PROGRAMS TO IDENTIFY AND REPLACE VALVES WITH VISIBLE SURFACE CRACKING.ALTHOUGH THE TOPSEAL VALVES SUPPLIED TO FORD ALSO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN AFFECTED BY THE ANTI-OZONANT SUPPLY ISSUES IN MID TO LATE-2006, FORD INDICATED THAT ITS VALVES WERE MADE AT A DIFFERENT TOPSEAL PRODUCTION LINE AND WERE COMPOUNDED WITH A HIGHER PERCENTAGE OF EPDM RUBBER TO MEET MORE STRINGENT SPECIFICATIONS FROM FORD.ODI'S ANALYSIS OF COMPLAINT AND WARRANTY DATA PROVIDED BY FORD SHOWED THAT PROBLEMS WITH CRACKED TIRE VALVES WERE SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER FOR MY 2007 VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM DECEMBER 2006 THROUGH MARCH 2007.FORD RESPONDED BY IMPLEMENTING CHANGES IN ITS MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR SNAP-IN RUBBER TIRE VALVES AND ALSO INCREASING THE QUALITY AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS FOR VALVES IMPORTED FOR USE IN ITS VEHICLES.WHILE THE COMPLAINT AND WARRANTY CLAIM RATES ARE ELEVATED FOR SUBJECT VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM DECEMBER 2006 THROUGH MARCH 2007, THE RATES OF LEAKING VALVES ARE WELL BELOW ONE PERCENT OF PRODUCTION FOR EACH OF THE PEAK MONTHS FOR ALL OF THE AFFECTED MODELS.A SUBSTANTIAL MAJORITY OF THE SUBJECT VEHICLES ARE EQUIPPED WITH TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEMS (TPMS) WHICH WARN THE DRIVER WHEN ANY TIRE PRESSURES DROPS BELOW 25 PERCENT OF RECOMMENDED INFLATION PRESSURE. AS OUTLINED IN A LETTER TO ODI DATED APRIL 6, 2009, FORD HAS AGREED TO SEND LETTERS TO OWNERS OF CERTAIN MY 2007 AND 2008 FORD, LINCOLN AND MERCURY VEHICLES TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CRACKING CONCERN. LETTERS WILL BE SENT TO OWNERS OF VEHICLES BUILT FROM NOVEMBER 2006 THROUGH MAY 2007.OWNERS CAN OPT FOR A FREE DEALER INSPECTION.VALVES EXHIBITING SURFACE CRACKS OR AIR LEAKAGE RELATED TO OZONE ATTACK WILL BE REPLACED BY FORD UNDER ITS NORMAL WARRANTY TERMS.FORD EXPECTS TO SEND THE LETTER BY APPROXIMATELY MID-MAY 2009. BASED ON THE USE OF TPMS IN THE MAJORITY OF SUBJECT VEHICLES AND THE RELATIVELY LOW RATES OF REPAIRS ASSOCIATED WITH LEAKING VALVES AND RESULTANT TIRE DAMAGE, ODI BELIEVES THAT THE ACTIONS FORD HAS AGREED TO TAKE WILL PROVIDE EFFECTIVE AND EXPEDITIOUS RESOLUTION FOR VEHICLES THAT WERE BUILT DURING THE PERIOD WHEN VALVES WITH INADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO OZONE CRACKING WERE MOST LIKELY TO HAVE BEEN USED IN VEHICLE PRODUCTION.FURTHER INVESTIGATION OF THIS MATTER WOULD NOT BE AN EFFICIENT ALLOCATION OF AGENCY RESOURCES.ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT A SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT DOES NOT EXIST.THE AGENCY WILL CONTINUE TO
2007 Mercury Grand Marquis Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year
Illustration