2001 Mercedes Benz Slk

WHILE DRIVING UNDER 30 MPH, VEHICLE RANDOMLY APPLIES FRONT OR REAR BRAKE CAUSING A LOUD BRAKING SQUEAL AND CAUSING THE CAR TO BUCK OR PITCH TO ONE SIDE. IT HAS OCCURRED FROM A STOPPED POSITION AS I STARTED TO ACCELERATE, BUT 90% OF THE TIME IT OCCURS AT SPEEDS UNDER 30-35 MPH WHILE JUST DRIVING IN A SIMPLE OR LONG CURVE. IT HAS ALSO HAPPENED IN PARKING LOTS WHEN APPLYING THE BRAKES BY LOCKING UP ONE OR MORE BRAKES SO HARD AS TO MAKE VERY LOUD SQUEALING SOUNDS. THIS IS VERY SCARY AND COMPLETELY UNSAFE. *TR

REAR BRAKE LAMPS FAILED OVER AND OVER SINCE VEHICLE PURCHASED IN 2001. DEALER REPLACED BULBS NUMEROUS TIMES AND LAST REPLACED L & R BULBS ON 12/29/2006 AT 29005 MILES. IN APRIL 2007 A SAFETY RECALL WAS ISSUED FOR REAR BRAKE LAMPS FAILURE. REAR LAMPS FAILED ONCE AGAIN AT 39697 MILES AND VEHICLE WAS BROUGHT IN TO BEVERLY HILLS MB TO HAVE RECALL PERFORMED ON MAY 30, 2008. REAR BRAKE LAMPS HAVE FAILED ONCE AGAIN AS OF 6/1/ 2012 WITH 78000 MILES ON VEHICLE IN SPITE OF THE RECALL. INSPECTIONS BY AN INDEPENDENT MERCEDES REPAIR FACILITY AS WELL AS SIMONSON MERCEDES, SANTA MONICA REVEAL THAT THE LAMP SOCKETS ARE FAILING DUE TO ELECTRICAL ARCING AND BEGINNING TO MELT RESULTING IN FAILURE OF THE REAR BRAKE LAMPS TO FUNCTION. I AM CONCERNED THAT THIS IS A SERIOUS SAFETY ISSUE WHICH MAY RESULT IN A REAR COLLISION. I AM HOPING THAT YET ANOTHER SAFETY RECALL CAMPAIGN CAN BE INITIATED AS IT SEEMS THAT THE FIRST RECALL WAS NOT ENTIRELY EFFECTIVE. THANK YOU. *TR

THE AUTOMATICALLY DIMMING INTERIOR REAR VIEW MIRROR HAS LEAKED PART OF LIQUID CRYSTAL FLUID, SEVERELY DISTORTING THE REFLECTED IMAGE. IN ADDITION, SINCE THE MIRROR DOES NOT HAVE ANT MANUAL ADJUSTMENT FOR DAY/NIGHT SELECTION, ANY BRIGHT LIGHTS FROM BEHIND TEND TO BLIND OR AT LEAST INTERFERE WITH THE PROPER VISION. THIS DEFECT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED A SAFETY ISSUE.THE MANUFACTURER'S QUOTE TO CORRECT THIS DEFECT IS IN EXCESS OF $300 FOR PARTS AND LABOR. THE SAME DEFECT HAS BEEN REPORTED WIDELY IN VARIOUS USER GROUPS AND FORUMS. IN THE PAST THE MIRROR'S MANUFACTURER, MAGNA DONNELLY CORPORATION OF HOLLAND, MI DID PROVIDE FREE REPLACEMENTS UNDER AN EXTENDED WARRANTY, BUT SINCE EARLY 2008 HAS DISCONTINUED TO HONOR THIS PRACTICE WITHOUT EXPLANATION. AS THIS IS A QUALITY ISSUE WITH POTENTIALLY SERIOUS SAFETY CONSEQUENCES, I REQUEST THE MANUFACTURER OF THE VEHICLE, MERCEDES BENZ, TO RECALL THE AFFECTED VEHICLES AND REPLACE THE DEFECTIVE MIRRORS. ACCORDING TO MANY OWNERS, THE AUTO DIMMING EXTERIOR MIRRORS ALSO FREQUENTLY SUFFER THE SAME FAILURES. *TR

CAR HESITATES SOMETIMES WHEN TAKING OFF AND ACCELERATING IF I DON'T RELEASE CLUTCH PROPERLY. IT'S AS IF THE COMPUTER TAKES OVER AND PREVENTS CAR FROM ACCELERATING. I'VE STALLED CARS; THIS IS DIFFERENT. THE STALL IS NOT RELATED TO THE SHIFTING BUT TO THE ACCELERATION. IT'S LIKE THE COMPUTER SOFTWARE TAKES OVER AND STOPS THE ACCELERATION. SUCH IS NOT NEED AND ACTUALLY MAKES LESS SAFE THE CONDITION. IF I RELEASE THE CLUTCH A BIT OUT-OF-TIME I DON'T WANT MY ACCELERATION BEING CHANGED. THIS HAS HAPPENED NINE OR MORE TIMES. I AM INDICATING A DATE BELOW BECAUSE IT IS REQUIRED. IT HAS NOT HAPPENED TAKING OFF ONTO A HIGHWAY, BUT SUCH IS A CONCERN. I DON'T LIKE MY CONTROL OVER THE ACCELERATOR BEING MANIPULATED BY SOFTWARE OR SOME COMPUTER PROGRAM. I'M 54 YEARS OLD AND HAVE DRIVEN AUTOMATICS AND MANUAL TRANSMISSIONS FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS AND MAYBE A MILLION OR MORE MILES. UNTIL THIS CAR, IF I SLIPPED A BIT ON THE CLUTCH MY ACCELERATION HAD NEVER BEFORE IN OTHER CARS BEEN AFFECTED OTHER THAN BY MY OWN FOOT TO ACCELERATOR PEDAL. WITH THIS 2001 SLK 320, I CAN DEPRESS THE PEDAL AND IT DOESN'T SPEED UP, BUT BOGS DOWN. A MECHANIC TOLD ME IT'S THE MERCEDES SAFETY FEATURE IN THE COMPUTER SOFTWARE. I FIND IT A SAFETY HAZARD, AS IT PREVENTS MY CONTROL OF THE CAR'S ACCELERATION AND CAUSE ME CONCERN AS I AM DRIVING. I JUST WANTED TO REPORT THIS, AS THE NEW STORIES BLAST TOYOTA I REALIZED I'D CHECK ON RECALLS ON THE 2001 SLK 320 MB, BUT I FOUND NONE RELATED TO THIS ISSUE. THANK YOU. *TR

THE TRUNK LID ON THE MERCEDES BENZ MODEL SLK320, ALL MODEL YEARS, FALLS DOWN ON ITS OWN ONTO THE UNSUSPECTING HEAD OF THE INDIVIDUAL LOADING OR UNLOADING THE TRUNK. THIS HAS HAPPENED TO ME AND OTHER OWNERS OF THIS MODEL. WE ALL HAVE SHARED THIS PAINFUL EXPERIENCE. IT HAS HAPPENED TO ME 4 TIMES IN RECENT TIMES. THE STRUTS, RESEMBLING SHOCK ABSORBERS SIMPLY DO NOT HOLD UP THE LID TIGHTLY ENOUGH. HAS BEEN HAPPENING CONSISTENTLY; THE LID FAILS ALL THE TIME; CONSEQUENCES ARE A CUT HEAD, SLIGHT CONCUSSION AND HEADACHES; NO PARTS WERE REPLACED, IT SEEMS TO BE A DESIGN FLAW. *TR