NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
Structure complaints
20 reportsClear category filter28,000 miles · May 27, 2015
Electrical SystemStructure
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 JEEP LIBERTY. WHILE DRIVING AT 50 MPH, THE SKY SLIDER ROOF FAILED TO AUTOMATICALLY CLOSE. THE CONTACT HAD TO MANUALLY CLOSE THE SLIDER. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER AND AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC, BUT IT WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 JEEP LIBERTY. WHILE DRIVING AT 50 MPH, THE SKY SLIDER ROOF FAILED TO AUTOMATICALLY CLOSE. THE CONTACT HAD TO MANUALLY CLOSE THE SLIDER. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER AND AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC, BUT IT WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 28,000.
NHTSA ODI #10721795
28,000 miles · Apr 1, 2015
Structure
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 JEEP LIBERTY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE PANORAMIC ROOF WAS LOOSE AT THE REAR AND THE ROOF WAS UNSTABLE AND UNSECURED. THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURES WAS NOT DIAGNOSED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED. THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 28,000.
NHTSA ODI #10703023
Mileage unknown · Dec 2, 2014
Structure
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 JEEP LIBERTY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS LEAKING WATER FROM THE INTERIOR DRIVER SIDE FLOOR BOARD. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER HOWEVER, THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS UNKNOWN.
NHTSA ODI #10661581
Mileage unknown · Dec 2, 2014
Structure
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 JEEP LIBERTY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS LEAKING WATER FROM THE INTERIOR DRIVER SIDE FLOORBOARD. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER, BUT WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS UNKNOWN.
NHTSA ODI #10661560
Mileage unknown · Jun 22, 2014
Structure
LIFT GATE HYDRAULICS RUSTING. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10605096
90,000 miles · May 3, 2014
StructureSuspension
THE BODY HAS A NOTICEABLE LEAN TO THE DRIVER SIDE. THE DRIVER SIDE IS ONE INCH LOWER THAN THE PASSENGER SIDE. I HAD NEW SHOCKS AND STRUTS INSTALLED THINKING THAT THIS WOULD BRING THE BODY BACK TO A LEVEL POSITION. I ALSO REMOVED ALL EXTRA GEAR FROM THE VEHICLE TO ELIMINATE THE POSSIBILITY OF EXTRA WEIGHT, BUT THE VEHICLE STILL H…
Read full complaint
THE BODY HAS A NOTICEABLE LEAN TO THE DRIVER SIDE. THE DRIVER SIDE IS ONE INCH LOWER THAN THE PASSENGER SIDE. I HAD NEW SHOCKS AND STRUTS INSTALLED THINKING THAT THIS WOULD BRING THE BODY BACK TO A LEVEL POSITION. I ALSO REMOVED ALL EXTRA GEAR FROM THE VEHICLE TO ELIMINATE THE POSSIBILITY OF EXTRA WEIGHT, BUT THE VEHICLE STILL HAS THE SAME AMOUNT OF LEAN TO THE DRIVER SIDE. THE MEASUREMENTS ARE TAKEN ON LEVEL GROUND. THE MEASUREMENTS ARE TAKEN FROM THE GROUND TO THE WHEEL WELL LIP THROUGH THE CENTER LINE OF THE WHEEL. THE DRIVER SIDE, FRONT AND REAR IS ONE INCH LOWER THAN THE PASSENGER SIDE FRONT AND REAR. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10586334
6,000 miles · Jun 14, 2013
Electrical SystemStructure
I BOUGHT MY JEEP BRAND NEW IN APRIL OF 2009. WHEN IT WAS JUST A FEW MONTHS OLD, I STARTED EXPERIENCING A PHANTOM 'DING' THAT WOULD NORMALLY BE ASSOCIATED WITH LOW FUEL, CHECK ENGINE, ETC. BUT WHEN THE DING WOULD SOUND, NO WARNING LIGHTS WOULD APPEAR. TRIED TO HAVE DEALER FIND PROBLEM, THEY COULDN'T REPLICATE SINCE IT WAS SO RAND…
Read full complaint
I BOUGHT MY JEEP BRAND NEW IN APRIL OF 2009. WHEN IT WAS JUST A FEW MONTHS OLD, I STARTED EXPERIENCING A PHANTOM 'DING' THAT WOULD NORMALLY BE ASSOCIATED WITH LOW FUEL, CHECK ENGINE, ETC. BUT WHEN THE DING WOULD SOUND, NO WARNING LIGHTS WOULD APPEAR. TRIED TO HAVE DEALER FIND PROBLEM, THEY COULDN'T REPLICATE SINCE IT WAS SO RANDOM, SO IT NEVER GOT FIXED. AROUND APRIL OF THIS YEAR (2013) THE DING STILL CONTINUES TO DRIVE ME NUTS, AND NOW MY 'ESPOFF,' '4WD,' 'SERVICE 4WD,' AND '4LOW' LIGHTS COME ON AND OFF AT RANDOM;SOMETIMES EVERY TEN SECONDS WHILE I'M DRIVING. ALSO, MY RADIO/NAV SCREEN SYSTEM WILL RANDOMLY TURN ITSELF OFF AND RESTART. TOOK IT TO THE DEALER, THEY SAID THEY HAVE GOTTEN THIS SAME COMPLAINT FROM A LOT OF OTHER PEOPLE, BUT THERE IS NO RECALL ISSUED. I WAS TOLD THE PROBLEM WITH THE STEREO ALONE IS A $1,200 FIX AND THAT I'M BETTER OFF GOING TO A CAR AUDIO DEALER AND GETTING SOMETHING CUSTOM DONE. I CAN'T BELIEVE THERE ISN'T A RECALL FOR THIS, IT IS VERY DISTRACTING TO HAVE ALL THESE LIGHTS COMING ON AND OFF WHILE DRIVING, NOT TO MENTION UNNERVING. ALSO, MY LIFT GATE WINDOW HAS ALWAYS LEAKED AROUND THE SEAL, EVEN AFTER THE DEALER REPLACED IT. THEY SAID THEY TESTED IT UNDER HIGH PRESSURE WASH AND IT DIDN'T LEAK, THEN A FEW DAYS LATER IT RAINED AND THERE WAS WATER ALL OVER THE INSIDE OF MY LIFT GATE. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10519783
3,254,960 miles · Feb 22, 2013
Latches/locks/linkagesStructure
IN JUNE 2011, THE REAR LIFT GATE WOULD NOT UNLOCK ON MY 09 JEEP LIBERTY SPORT. THE DEALERSHIP REPLACED THE REAR LIFT GATE LATCH AS WELL AS BOTH IGNITION KEYS UNDER WARRANTY. THOUGHT THE PROBLEM WAS RESOLVED BUT IN FEBRUARY 2013, 1 1/2 YEARS LATER HAD THE SAME FAILURE WITH THE REAR LIFT GATE NOT UNLOCKING ON THE SAME VEHICLE. THE…
Read full complaint
IN JUNE 2011, THE REAR LIFT GATE WOULD NOT UNLOCK ON MY 09 JEEP LIBERTY SPORT. THE DEALERSHIP REPLACED THE REAR LIFT GATE LATCH AS WELL AS BOTH IGNITION KEYS UNDER WARRANTY. THOUGHT THE PROBLEM WAS RESOLVED BUT IN FEBRUARY 2013, 1 1/2 YEARS LATER HAD THE SAME FAILURE WITH THE REAR LIFT GATE NOT UNLOCKING ON THE SAME VEHICLE. THE DEALERSHIP AGAIN REPLACED THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED REAR LIFT GATE LATCH AS WELL AS THE REAR GLASS WINDOW WEATHER STRIPPING DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE WEATHER STRIPPING JOINT HAD SIGNS OF RUST STAINS (PREMATURE FAILURE). THE FIX TO PREVENT WATER LEAKING THROUGH THE UPPER GLASS WINDOW LATCH POCKET TO THE REAR LIFT GATE LATCH, WHICH HAD SHORTED OUT AGAIN WAS TO OFFSET THE WEATHER STRIPPING JOINT 6" VERTICALLY AWAY FROM THE UPPER GLASS WINDOW LATCH POCKET SO THAT ANY WATER COULD NOT ENTER THE INNER REAR LIFT GATE. THE NON-WARRANTY REPAIR FOR THIS PROBLEM IS APPROXIMATELY $400.00. ROUTINE MAINTENANCE INSPECTION FOR ANY WEATHER STRIPPING IS NOT IN YOUR VEHICLE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL BUT I WOULD HIGHLY RECOMMEND THAT YOU PERIODICALLY CHECK ALL DOORS AND LIFT GATES SEALS AND WEATHER STRIPPING FOR SIGNS OF WEAR OR PREMATURE FAILURES OR YOU WILL BE REPLACING INTERNAL COMPONENTS DUE TO WATER DAMAGE. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10499698
150 miles · Jan 8, 2013
Structure
AS WE WERE DRIVING OUR CAR ON THE INTERSTATE, WE NOTICED THAT THE CLOSED SLIDING ROOF WAS BUCKLING ON BOTH THE DRIVER SIDE AND PASSENGER SIDE (RIGHT ABOVE THE HEADRESTS) AND WE COULD HEAR THIS WHISTLING SOUND AND FEEL AIR COMING FROM THE RAISED JUNCTION. WE SUBSEQUENTLY CALLED THE DEALERSHIP FROM WHICH WE HAD PURCHASED THE NEW…
Read full complaint
AS WE WERE DRIVING OUR CAR ON THE INTERSTATE, WE NOTICED THAT THE CLOSED SLIDING ROOF WAS BUCKLING ON BOTH THE DRIVER SIDE AND PASSENGER SIDE (RIGHT ABOVE THE HEADRESTS) AND WE COULD HEAR THIS WHISTLING SOUND AND FEEL AIR COMING FROM THE RAISED JUNCTION. WE SUBSEQUENTLY CALLED THE DEALERSHIP FROM WHICH WE HAD PURCHASED THE NEW VEHICLE, BRUNSWICK AUTO, AND INQUIRED ABOUT ANY RECALLS ON THE SLIDING ROOF. WE WERE TOLD THAT THERE HAD BEEN NO RECALLS. WE LATER HAD THE ROOF EXAMINED AND WAS TOLD THAT NO PROBLEMS WERE FOUND. WE CONTINUED TO NOTICE THE SAME ISSUES. IN DECEMBER 2012, PRIOR TO OUR ORIGINAL WARRANTY EXPIRING (WE DID PURCHASE AN EXTENDED WARRANTY AT THE TIME OF VEHICLE PURCHASE), WE TOOK THE CAR TO ADVENTURE JEEP OF WILLOUGHBY, OH TO HAVE THE ROOF RE-EXAMINED. WE WERE TOLD THAT THE SLIDING ROOF WAS MISALIGNED AND THE PROBLEM HAD BEEN CORRECTED. UPON DRIVING HOME, WE NOTICED THE PROBLEM HAD NOT BEEN CORRECTED AND REMAINED THE SAME. WE HAVE TEN MONTH OLD TWINS AND ARE TRAVELING FREQUENTLY TO VISIT FAMILY. WE ARE CONCERNED NOW THAT THE SLIDING ROOF MAY FLY OFF COMPLETELY WHEN WE ARE ON THE INTERSTATE. WE HAVE HAD THIS ISSUE LOOKED AT TWICE BY "PROFESSIONALS". ANY ASSISTANCE AND ADVOCACY IS APPRECIATED. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10491913
36,000 miles · Jul 10, 2012
Structure
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 JEEP LIBERTY. WHILE PARKED THE CONTACT DEPRESSED THE SWITCH THAT CONTROLLED THE SKY SLIDER ROOF AND NOTICED THAT THE ROOF WOULD NOT CLOSE PROPERLY. THE DEALER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE AND STATED THE SKY SLIDER ROOF CABLE MAY HAVE TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILU…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 JEEP LIBERTY. WHILE PARKED THE CONTACT DEPRESSED THE SWITCH THAT CONTROLLED THE SKY SLIDER ROOF AND NOTICED THAT THE ROOF WOULD NOT CLOSE PROPERLY. THE DEALER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE AND STATED THE SKY SLIDER ROOF CABLE MAY HAVE TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 36,000.
NHTSA ODI #10465095
NHTSA investigations
1DP14004 · Totally Integrated Power Module Failure
Opened Sep 25, 2014 · Closed Jul 24, 2015
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System
In a letter dated August 21, 2014, the Center for Auto Safety (CAS) petitioned the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to initiate a defect investigation of alleged failures associated with the Totally Integrated Power Module (TIPM) installed in Chrysler SUV?s, trucks, and vans beginning in the 2007 model year. The petitioner alleges that TIPM defects may result in engine stall, airbag non-deployment, failure of fuel pump shutoff resulting in unintended acceleration, fire, and other symptoms. On September 25, 2014, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened DP14-004 to evaluate the petition for a grant or deny decision. ODI analyzed complaint data provided by CAS as well as complaints submitted to ODI from consumers. In total, there were 296 complaints submitted by the petitioner in the original petition and five supplements, including 271 complaints related to the subject vehicles equipped with TIPM-7. Approximately 3 percent of CAS complaints are related to vehicles equipped with TIPM-6 and ODI?s review of these complaints did not identify any safety defect trends. ODI conducted a detailed review of complaints narratives submitted by CAS and consumers including careful analysis of vehicle repair histories, warranty claims obtained from the manufacturer and any available Customer Assistance Inquiry reports (CAIR). Analysis of the field data indicated that MY2011-2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles exhibited significantly higher complaint rates related to fuel pump relay (FPR) failures than other subject vehicles. In a September 3, 2014 letter to NHTSA, Chrysler submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) identifying a defect in the FPR within the TIPM-7 which can result in a no start or stall condition in approximately 188,723 model year (MY) 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (WK) and Dodge Durango (WD) vehicles manufactured from January 5, 2010 through July 20, 2011 (14V-530).In a February 24, 2015 letter, Chrysler submitted a second DIR expanding the scope of the FPR defect condition to include an additional 338,216 MY 2012 through 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles manufactured from September 17, 2010 through August 19, 2013 and MY 2012 through 2013 Dodge Durango vehicles manufactured from January 18, 2011 through August 19, 2013 (15V-115).ODI analysis of the CAS allegations of TIPM defects resulting in stall while driving, airbag non-deployment, unintended acceleration, fire and other faults identified a single defect condition related to 1 of over 60 different circuits in the TIPM assembly. The most common effect of this defect condition, related to the fuel pump relay, was a no-start concern, but it could also result in stall while driving (76 complaints). No valid evidence was presented in support of claims related to airbag non-deployment, unintended acceleration or fire resulting from TIPM faults and these claims were found to be wholly without merit based on review of the field data and design of the relevant systems and components.Except insofar as the petitioner's contentions relate to the defect condition addressed by the Chrysler recalls, the factual bases of the petitioner's contentions that any further investigation is necessary are unsupported. In our view, additional investigation is unlikely to result in a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists or a NHTSA order for the notification and remedy of a safety-related defect as alleged by the petitioner at the conclusion of the requested investigation. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA's limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is den