← New search

2016 Honda CR-V

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2016 Honda CR-V do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 400.5.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

235 reports with mileage · 157 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Engine. Review the 101 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Fuel/propulsion System. Review the 65 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 64 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

40 crash reports4 fire reports28 injury reports

What owners actually said

392 reports
1,945 miles · Oct 13, 2016
Service BrakesCrash

I PULLED INTO A PARKING LOT GOING ABOUT 2 OR 3 MPH. WHEN I PULLED INTO THE PARKING SPACE TO PARK, I PRESSED ON THE BRAKE PEDAL BUT THE PEDAL DIDN'T SEEM TO MOVE. IT FELT SOLID AND THERE WERE NO BRAKES. MY CAR JUMPED THE SMALL CURB AND HIT A VEHICLE IN THE ADJACENT PARKING LOT. MY DRIVER SIDE AIRBAG DEPLOYED. THE CAR WAS T…

Read full complaint

I PULLED INTO A PARKING LOT GOING ABOUT 2 OR 3 MPH. WHEN I PULLED INTO THE PARKING SPACE TO PARK, I PRESSED ON THE BRAKE PEDAL BUT THE PEDAL DIDN'T SEEM TO MOVE. IT FELT SOLID AND THERE WERE NO BRAKES. MY CAR JUMPED THE SMALL CURB AND HIT A VEHICLE IN THE ADJACENT PARKING LOT. MY DRIVER SIDE AIRBAG DEPLOYED. THE CAR WAS TOWED TO THE BODY SHOP AND THE BODY SHOP OWNER SAID THE BRAKE SYSTEM LIGHT WAS ON. HONDA AGREED TO HAVE THE CAR TOWED TO THE DEALERSHIP TO HAVE A HONDA CERTIFIED MECHANIC CHECK OUT THE BRAKE SYSTEM. A HONDA REPRESENTATIVE CAME TO THE DEALERSHIP TO CHECK OUT THE BRAKE SYSTEM AND SAID THEY CAN'T REPLICATE THE PROBLEM SO THERE IS NOTHING THEY CAN DO. THEY SAID I SHOULD DRIVE IT AND MONITOR THE BRAKES. WITH THE POSSIBILITY OF THE BRAKES FAILING AGAIN, I DON'T WANT TO DRIVE THAT VEHICLE AGAIN.

NHTSA ODI #10915920

14,500 miles · Oct 6, 2016
Engine

EXCESSIVE VIBRATION - THE ENGINE IS AT 600 RPM WHEN IDLING. THIS CREATES A NOTICEABLE VIBRATION THROUGHOUT THE CAR AT IDLE. THIS IS ALSO A PROBLEM WHEN DRIVING IN HEAVY TRAFFIC. THIS VIBRATION IS CAUSING ME DIZZINESS AND SOMETIMES I HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO CONTINUE DRIVING (AND I NEEDED TO BE PICKED UP). I TOLD THE SERVICE DEPA…

Read full complaint

EXCESSIVE VIBRATION - THE ENGINE IS AT 600 RPM WHEN IDLING. THIS CREATES A NOTICEABLE VIBRATION THROUGHOUT THE CAR AT IDLE. THIS IS ALSO A PROBLEM WHEN DRIVING IN HEAVY TRAFFIC. THIS VIBRATION IS CAUSING ME DIZZINESS AND SOMETIMES I HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO CONTINUE DRIVING (AND I NEEDED TO BE PICKED UP). I TOLD THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT AT MY HONDA DEALERSHIP. THEY SAID THAT ALL 2016 HONDA CR-V IDLE AT 600 RPM. THEY OFFERED NO RESOLUTION TO THIS PROBLEM.

NHTSA ODI #10914213

3,000 miles · Sep 20, 2016
Service Brakes

ON 8/10/2016, MY WIFE WAS DRIVING THE VEHICLE SLOWLY ON A STREET WITH A DOWNWARD SLOPE TOWARDS A CROSSROAD. MY DAUGHTER (A KID) WAS SITTING AT THE BACK SEAT. WHEN SHE SAW THE TRAFFIC LIGHT WAS RED, SHE TRIED TO STOP THE VEHICLE BY PRESSING THE BRAKE. BUT THE BRAKE DID NOT WORK. SHE FELT THAT SHE WAS PRESSING A ROCK. SHE WAS PLA…

Read full complaint

ON 8/10/2016, MY WIFE WAS DRIVING THE VEHICLE SLOWLY ON A STREET WITH A DOWNWARD SLOPE TOWARDS A CROSSROAD. MY DAUGHTER (A KID) WAS SITTING AT THE BACK SEAT. WHEN SHE SAW THE TRAFFIC LIGHT WAS RED, SHE TRIED TO STOP THE VEHICLE BY PRESSING THE BRAKE. BUT THE BRAKE DID NOT WORK. SHE FELT THAT SHE WAS PRESSING A ROCK. SHE WAS PLANNING TO GO STRAIGHT ACROSS THE JUNCTURE, BUT IN ORDER TO AVOID RUNNING INTO THE RED LIGHT AND A POTENTIAL ACCIDENT, SHE TURNED THE VEHICLE RIGHT TOWARDS THE STREET ON HER RIGHT SIDE. THEN SHE TURNED OFF THE ENGINE, AND THE VEHICLE STOPPED. IT WAS A VERY SCARY EXPERIENCE FOR MY WIFE. CLEARLY THE BRAKE FAILED. SO THE NEXT MORNING (8/11) WE TOOK THE VEHICLE TO OUR LOCAL DEALER, AND ASKED THEM TO CHECK THE BRAKE. AFTER CHECKING, THEY TOLD US THAT THEY COULD NOT REPLICATE THE INCIDENT, AND COULD NOT DO ANYTHING. THEREFORE I CALLED AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. AND REQUESTED THAT THEY SEND SOMEBODY TO CHECK THE VEHICLE. AFTER A LONG DELAY, THEIR DISTRICT SERVICES MANAGER VISITED THE LOCAL DEALER, AND INSTRUCTED THE DEALERSHIP TO BLEED THE BRAKE FLUID. THIS IS NOT THE RIGHT SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM. IF THERE IS AIR IN THE BRAKE FLUID, YOU NEED TO BLEED THE BRAKE FLUID. BUT THAT'S NOT THE PROBLEM MY WIFE EXPERIENCED WHEN THE INCIDENT HAPPENED. THE PROBLEM WAS WHEN SHE PRESSED THE BRAKE, SHE FELT SHE WAS PRESSING A ROCK. THE BRAKE FAILED AT THAT TIME. SO WE REQUESTED AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. TO REPLACE THE BRAKE SYSTEM, BUT THEY DECLINED ON THE BASIS THAT THEY COULD NOT REPLICATE THE INCIDENT. IT HAS BEEN ONE AND A HALF MONTHS SINCE WE TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE LOCAL DEALER. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. DID NOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM, AND THE DEALER NOW ASKED ME TO TAKE THE VEHICLE HOME. HOW CAN WE DRIVE THE VEHICLE AGAIN IF THERE IS A POTENTIAL RISK OF THIS INCIDENT HAPPENING AGAIN. THE BRAKE MAY FAIL AGAIN, AND SOMEBODY MAY DIE.

NHTSA ODI #10908334

2,552 miles · Sep 13, 2016
Service Brakes, HydraulicCrash

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2016 HONDA CR-V. WHILE PULLING INTO A PARKING SPOT AT 3 MPH, THE BRAKE PEDAL DEPRESSED COMPLETELY TO THE FLOORBOARD. THE VEHICLE CRASHED INTO A CONCRETE WALL WITHOUT WARNING. WHEN THE CONTACT TURNED OFF AND RESTARTED THE VEHICLE, THE BRAKE INDICATOR ILLUMINATED AND THE BRAKE PEDAL DEPRESSED TO THE FLOOR AG…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2016 HONDA CR-V. WHILE PULLING INTO A PARKING SPOT AT 3 MPH, THE BRAKE PEDAL DEPRESSED COMPLETELY TO THE FLOORBOARD. THE VEHICLE CRASHED INTO A CONCRETE WALL WITHOUT WARNING. WHEN THE CONTACT TURNED OFF AND RESTARTED THE VEHICLE, THE BRAKE INDICATOR ILLUMINATED AND THE BRAKE PEDAL DEPRESSED TO THE FLOOR AGAIN. THE AIR BAGS DID NOT DEPLOY. A POLICE REPORT WAS NOT FILED AND THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A DEALER, BUT WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 2,552. UPDATED 11/07/16*LJ THE CONSUMER SOLD THE VEHICLE BACK TO THE DEALER AS A TRADE IN ON ANOTHER VEHICLE.

NHTSA ODI #10906215

3,500 miles · Sep 8, 2016
Tires

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2016 HONDA CR-V EQUIPPED WITH BRIDGESTONE DUELER H/P (NA) TIRES, SIZE: 225/65R17 (NA). WHILE DRIVING 55 MPH, THERE WAS AN ABNORMAL NOISE COMING FROM THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE. UPON INSPECTION, THE CONTACT NOTICED THAT THE REAR PASSENGER SIDE TIRE HAD DEFLATED. THE CONTACT INDEPENDENTLY REPLACED THE TIRE WITH…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2016 HONDA CR-V EQUIPPED WITH BRIDGESTONE DUELER H/P (NA) TIRES, SIZE: 225/65R17 (NA). WHILE DRIVING 55 MPH, THERE WAS AN ABNORMAL NOISE COMING FROM THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE. UPON INSPECTION, THE CONTACT NOTICED THAT THE REAR PASSENGER SIDE TIRE HAD DEFLATED. THE CONTACT INDEPENDENTLY REPLACED THE TIRE WITH THE SPARE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED NOR REPAIRED. THE VEHICLE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE TIRE AND VEHICLE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 3,500.

NHTSA ODI #10904611

8,500 miles · Aug 27, 2016
Visibility/wiper

CHIPPED AND/OR CRACKED HONDA WINDSHIELD SEEMS TO BE A PROBLEM. THIS IS OUR 3RD HONDA CR-V (2010, 2013, AND 2016) AND WITH EACH VEHICLE, THE WINDSHIELD WOULD CHIP EASILY FROM A STONE OR PEBBLE ON THE HIGHWAY; TRY TO REPAIR BUT THE CHIP/CRACK WOULD SPREAD; AND SO, EACH TIME THE WINDSHIELD HAD TO BE REPLACED. SAFELITE TRIED TO REPA…

Read full complaint

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

NHTSA ODI #10901941

12,500 miles · Aug 25, 2016
Power TrainInjury

VEHICLE WAS STOPPED ON A SLOPED DRIVEWAY, MOTOR RUNNING, IN PARK. DRIVER WAS STANDING OUTSIDE THE CAR WITH DRIVER DOOR OPEN ATTEMPTING TO ADJUST DRIVER SEAT POSITION. PASSENGER REACHED OVER AND PUSHED START/STOP BUTTON (DID NOT CONTACT THE SHIFT LEVER). VEHICLE STARTED ROLLING BACKWARD,ACROSS STREET INTO NEIGHBOR'S DRIVEWAY AND…

Read full complaint

VEHICLE WAS STOPPED ON A SLOPED DRIVEWAY, MOTOR RUNNING, IN PARK. DRIVER WAS STANDING OUTSIDE THE CAR WITH DRIVER DOOR OPEN ATTEMPTING TO ADJUST DRIVER SEAT POSITION. PASSENGER REACHED OVER AND PUSHED START/STOP BUTTON (DID NOT CONTACT THE SHIFT LEVER). VEHICLE STARTED ROLLING BACKWARD,ACROSS STREET INTO NEIGHBOR'S DRIVEWAY AND THEN CAME TO REST IN THE MIDDLE OF THE STREET. DRIVER DROPPED AND ROLLED AND SUSTAINED MINOR INJURIES(SCRAPES AND BRUISING) NO POLICE REPORT FILED.

NHTSA ODI #10898506

Mileage unknown · Aug 23, 2016
Electrical SystemPower Train

2016 HONDA CR-V. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO VEHICLE TRANSMISSION HESITATES, FAIL TO ACCELERATE AND CUT OFF. DEALERSHIP STATED NOTHING WRONG WITH THE VEHICLE/ *SMD

NHTSA ODI #10896764

136,000 miles · Aug 12, 2016
Power Train

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2016 HONDA CR-V. THE CONTACT STATED THAT A BUZZING NOISE WAS HEARD WHEN THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED. IN ADDITION, WHILE DRIVING AT VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE VEHICLE VIBRATED SEVERELY. THE FAILURE RECURRED WHENEVER THE VEHICLE WAS OPERATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED, BUT T…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2016 HONDA CR-V. THE CONTACT STATED THAT A BUZZING NOISE WAS HEARD WHEN THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED. IN ADDITION, WHILE DRIVING AT VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE VEHICLE VIBRATED SEVERELY. THE FAILURE RECURRED WHENEVER THE VEHICLE WAS OPERATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED, BUT THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE WAS NOT FOUND. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 136,000.

NHTSA ODI #10895429

1,600 miles · Aug 11, 2016
Service BrakesVehicle Speed Control

DRIVING IN NEIGHBORHOOD AT 20-25 MPH, GOING DOWN SMALL HILL, VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED TO ABOUT 40 MPH. APPLIED BRAKES, WITH NO RESULT. CONTINUED UP GRADUAL INCLINE AND WAS ABLE TO STOP. AFTER A COUPLE OF MINUTES, DETERMINED THAT BRAKES WERE AGAIN RESPONDING, CONTINUED SLOWLY TO DESTINATION (TWO OR THREE BLOCKS). HONDA AR…

Read full complaint

DRIVING IN NEIGHBORHOOD AT 20-25 MPH, GOING DOWN SMALL HILL, VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED TO ABOUT 40 MPH. APPLIED BRAKES, WITH NO RESULT. CONTINUED UP GRADUAL INCLINE AND WAS ABLE TO STOP. AFTER A COUPLE OF MINUTES, DETERMINED THAT BRAKES WERE AGAIN RESPONDING, CONTINUED SLOWLY TO DESTINATION (TWO OR THREE BLOCKS). HONDA ARRANGED TOW TO DEALER. DEALER HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO "DUPLICATE CUSTOMER CONCERN," AND STATES THAT THE VEHICLE IS READY FOR US TO PICK UP. DO NOT WANT TO DRIVE THIS BRAND NEW CAR AGAIN.

NHTSA ODI #10895087

Official recalls

3

23V858000 · Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:fuel Pump

Dec 18, 2023

Honda (American Honda Motor Co.) is recalling certain 2013-2023 Honda Accord, Civic Coupe, Civic Sedan, Civic Hatchback, Civic Type R, CR-V, HR-V, Ridgeline, Odyssey, Acura ILX, MDX, MDX Hybrid, RDX, RLX, TLX, 2019-2022 Honda Insight, Passport, 2020 Honda CR-V Hybrid, 2018-2019 Honda Clarity PHEV, Fit, and 2015-2020 Honda Accord Hybrid, Pilot, Acura NSX vehicles. The fuel pump inside the fuel tank may fail.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Fuel pump failure can cause an engine stall while driving, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Dealers will replace the fuel pump module, free of charge. Owner letters were mailed September 6, 2024. Owners may contact Honda customer service at 1-888-234-2138. Honda's numbers for this recall are KGC and KGD. This recall is an expansion of NHTSA recall numbers 21V-215 and 20V-314.

17V305000 · Engine

May 4, 2017

Honda (American Honda Motor Co.) is recalling certain 2015-2016 Honda CR-V vehicles that recently received a replacement engine. The replacement engine may have been built with the wrong pistons, potentially affecting the engine's performance.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: The reduced performance may result in an engine stall, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Honda will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the engines and replace the incorrect components, as necessary, free of charge. The recall began June 20, 2017. Owners may contact Honda customer service at 1-888-234-2138. Honda's number for this recall is KF6.

15V714000 · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module

Oct 29, 2015

American Honda Motor Company, Inc. (Honda) is recalling certain model year 2016 CR-V vehicles manufactured October 12, 2015, to October 19, 2015. The metal housing surrounding the driver's air bag inflator in these vehicles may have been manufactured incorrectly.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the driver's frontal air bag, the inflator could rupture with metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.

Remedy: Honda will notify owners, and dealers will replace the driver side frontal air bag module, free of charge. The recall began in November 2015. Owners may contact Honda customer service at 1-888-234-2138. Honda'a number for this recall is JV9.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

EA19001 · Electrical Overstress

Opened Apr 19, 2019 · Closed Sep 19, 2024

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags: Air Bag/restraint Control Module

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation to determine if the failure of airbags to deploy during severe crashes, in certain vehicles, was the result of a safety related defect.  During the investigation a complex failure was studied that can result in non-deployment of subject vehicle air bags and other restraint system devices in severe crash events. The subject vehicles may be equipped with an airbag control unit (ACU) for the supplemental restraint system (SRS) Electronic Control Unit (ECU) manufactured by ZF-TRW.  The ECU receives signals from crash sensors mounted in the vehicle and deploys the vehicle air bags and seat belt pretensioners in accordance with manufacturer design specifications.  The ECU in the subject vehicles contains a model DS84 application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) which controls the communication of the crash sensor signal, firing commands (i.e., when to deploy the airbag(s) and/or pretensioners), and fault information (e.g., diagnostic trouble codes). In September 2016, FCA announced recall 16V-668 for certain model year (MY) 2010 to 2014 Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep products manufactured with the subject ZF-TRW ACU.  In this recall, FCA discussed an EOS condition that resulted in a failure of the subject DS84 ASIC, which caused air bag non-deployment.  FCA noted that the defect condition had only been observed in vehicles equipped with sensor harnessing routed across the front of the vehicle.  Other FCA vehicles that also used the subject ACU, but were not equipped with cross-car harnessing, had not experienced EOS failures, despite similar time in service. During the course of this investigation, ODI sent two separate Information Request (IR) letters to six vehicle manufactures (including FCA, Hyundai, Honda, Kia, Mitsubishi, and Toyota) and one IR letter to ZF-TRW.  These IR letters resulted in ODI receiving comprehensive data from these manufacturers and suppliers. Studies of this data found that the DS84 ASIC does not have sufficient protection against negative electrical transients or electrical overstress (“EOS”) that can be generated in certain severe crashes.  An electrical transient occurs when the electrical power supplied to a circuit changes momentarily over a short duration of time.   In these severe crash cases, the crash sensors and other powered wiring can be damaged and short circuited so as to create a negative electrical transient of sufficient intensity and duration (that are outside the vehicle manufacturer's specification) to damage the ASIC before the restraint device deployment signal is received by the SRS ECU.  This damaged signal can lead to incomplete or nondeployment of the air bags and/or pretensioners.  Airbag non-deployment and/or lack of pretensioner operation can increase the risk or severity of injury in a crash.A total of 8 fatalities and 14 injuries were associated with known EOS events. The common element in all investigated manufacturers vehicles is the SRS ECU containing a DS84 ASIC manufactured by ZF-TRW.  The risk associated with the ASIC is equally shared among all OEMS involved in the investigation.  The actual real-world risk can be mitigated by other factors which were assessed by ODI during this investigation. The first mitigating factor involves protections built into the ACU design which protect the DS84 ASIC from damage.  There are multiple strategies and levels of protection employed by different OEMs that provide effective EOS mitigation.  The two most common strategies at the ACU level are circuit protection diodes on the remote senor signal lines, and current limiting resistors that protect critical components. The second mitigating factor is found at the vehicle level and involves the location and routing of the wires leading from the crash sensors to the SRS ECU.  If the wires are well protected in a crash and are not routed with other power wires carrying large currents, the risk for an EOS event is significantly reduced or eliminated. These design specific factors combine to produce a spectrum of risk for the vehicles equipped with ACUs using the DS84 ASIC.  Given the many of years of field exposure, it is possible to divide the subject population into two groups; vehicles which have experienced EOS events, and vehicles which have not experienced EOS field events. Four of the six OEMs involved in this investigation have experienced EOS field events on at least one of their models equipped with a DS84 ASIC.  All vehicle models (including the Toyota models identified in the Failure Report Summary of the opening resume for this investigation) with field events have been recalled.  In an abundance of caution, ODI kept this investigation open five years to monitor field performance and did not identify any field events on vehicles not included in existing safety recalls. Given the spectrum of risk identified in this investigation and that all vehicles with a demonstrated unreasonable risk have been recalled, ODI is closing this investigation. ODI is closing this investigation with the following manufacturer safety recalls: 16V-668, 18E-043, 18V-137, 18V-363, and 20V-024.  With the recall actions taken by the subject vehicle and equipment manufacturers, this investigation is closed. The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exists on other model or model year vehicles outside of the recall scopes. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.

Go deeper into Honda CR-V problems