IllustrationACCELERATION WENT OUT. JUST QUIT WORKING WHILE ON INTERSTATE. FORTUNATELY WAS ABLE TO COAST OVER THREE LANES TO SHOULDER. FORD DEALER MECHANIC TOLD ME "HAVE TO RESET COMPUTER. THAT IT HAPPENS". IT WAS SECOND TIME IT HAPPENED. FIRST TIME WAS THREE YEARS AGO WHILE PULLING OUT OF PARKING LOT. *TR
2011 Ford Fusion Hybrid
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
More warning signs than most Fusion Hybrid years
Owner complaints for the 2011 Ford Fusion Hybrid are substantially higher than the model-year median of 65.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Fusion Hybrid years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
60–25K
1125–50K
3550–75K
2475–100K
16100–150K
5150K+
97 reports with mileage · 35 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Steering. Review the 43 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Air Bags. Review the 34 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Service Brakes. Review the 21 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
3 crash reports0 fire reports2 injury reports
What owners actually said
132 reportsTL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD FUSION HYBRID. WHILE DRIVING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 MPH, THE STEERING WHEEL SEIZED AND THE TRACTION CONTROL AND AN UNKNOWN WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE FAILURE RECURRED NUMEROUS TIMES. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MI…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD FUSION HYBRID. WHILE DRIVING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 MPH, THE STEERING WHEEL SEIZED AND THE TRACTION CONTROL AND AN UNKNOWN WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE FAILURE RECURRED NUMEROUS TIMES. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 60,000.
WAS AT DR APPOINTMENT WITH MY SON, BACKED UP AND THE STEERING POWER SERVICE LIGHT POPPED UP! LOST ALL POWER STEERING WHEN DRIVING TO GET IT HOME, COULD OF DIED!!! I CALLED FORD TO TOW CAR, AND THEY SAID MY WARRANTY RAN OUT 1,000 MILES AGO...... THERE ARE SOOO MANY COMPLAINTS THAT THIS SHOULD BE A RECALL TO SAVE LIVES!!!!! I WIL…
Read full complaint
WAS AT DR APPOINTMENT WITH MY SON, BACKED UP AND THE STEERING POWER SERVICE LIGHT POPPED UP! LOST ALL POWER STEERING WHEN DRIVING TO GET IT HOME, COULD OF DIED!!! I CALLED FORD TO TOW CAR, AND THEY SAID MY WARRANTY RAN OUT 1,000 MILES AGO...... THERE ARE SOOO MANY COMPLAINTS THAT THIS SHOULD BE A RECALL TO SAVE LIVES!!!!! I WILL NEVER BUY A FORD AGAIN! PART COSTS ABOUT $1400-1600??????? I PLAN ON TRADING THIS CAR I LOVED IN! *TR
STARTED CAR, WENT TO BACK UP AND NOTICED VERY QUICKLY I HAD NO POWER STEERING - POWER STEERING ASSIST FAULT ERROR MESSAGE DISPLAYED. I AM CURRENTLY UNABLE TO USE MY FORD FUSION DUE TO THE LACK OF POWER STEERING. IT WOULD BE HAZARDOUS FOR ME TO TRY AND DRIVE MY FUSION AT THIS TIME. *TR
POWER STEERING WARNING MESSAGE AND ADVANCETRAC ASSIST BOTH BECAME ILLUMINATED AFTER NORMAL DRIVING. THIS IS THE 3RD TIME THIS HAS OCCURRED. THE FIRST WAS JUST OVER 38000 MILES, THE SECOND AT 75000 MILES AND NOW THIS WEEK AT 89000 MILES. AFTER TURNING OFF VEHICLE AND TURNING BACK ON, THE INDICATOR MESSAGES WENT FROM JUST A WARNIN…
Read full complaint
POWER STEERING WARNING MESSAGE AND ADVANCETRAC ASSIST BOTH BECAME ILLUMINATED AFTER NORMAL DRIVING. THIS IS THE 3RD TIME THIS HAS OCCURRED. THE FIRST WAS JUST OVER 38000 MILES, THE SECOND AT 75000 MILES AND NOW THIS WEEK AT 89000 MILES. AFTER TURNING OFF VEHICLE AND TURNING BACK ON, THE INDICATOR MESSAGES WENT FROM JUST A WARNING TO THE WHOLE SYSTEM BECOMING DISABLED. POWER STEERING IS COMPLETELY OFF AND STEERING IS NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE. WE WERE 200 MILES FROM HOME ON A HOLIDAY WEEKEND KNOWING IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO GET TOWING SO WE DECIDED TO MAKE THE DRIVE WITHOUT POWER STEERING. A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION FOR US. FORD KNOWS ABOUT THESE PROBLEMS AND THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF COMPLAINTS ONLINE. A RECALL HAS TO BE MADE. THE FIRST TIME IT HAPPENED I TOOK IT TO THE DEALER AND THEY WANTED $3200 FOR AN ENTIRE STEERING SYSTEM. MY CAR WAS ONLY 2000 MILES ABOVE WARRANTY AND THEY WOULDN'T COVER IT. SO I HAD THEM RESET THE CODE AND THE STEERING BEGAN WORKING AGAIN FOR ANOTHER THREE YEARS WITHOUT INCIDENT. PLEASE PROTECT THE CONSUMER AND THE PUBLIC'S SAFETY BY MAKING FORD RECALL THE FUSION. IT CLEARLY HAS A STEERING FLAW. THANK YOU. *TR
1. THE 2011 FORD FUSION HYBRID IS EQUIPPED WITH A POWER POINT PROVIDING 110 VOLTS ALTERNATING CURRENT (VAC) TO A 3-PRONG RECEPTACLE LOCATED IN THE REAR SEAT AREA OF THE CENTER CONSOLE. THE 110 VAC POWER POINT IS EQUIPPED WITH A SAFETY CAP AND A SAFETY TWIST TAB THAT PROVIDE PROTECTION FROM INSERTING ANY OBJECT INTO THE POWER P…
Read full complaint
1. THE 2011 FORD FUSION HYBRID IS EQUIPPED WITH A POWER POINT PROVIDING 110 VOLTS ALTERNATING CURRENT (VAC) TO A 3-PRONG RECEPTACLE LOCATED IN THE REAR SEAT AREA OF THE CENTER CONSOLE. THE 110 VAC POWER POINT IS EQUIPPED WITH A SAFETY CAP AND A SAFETY TWIST TAB THAT PROVIDE PROTECTION FROM INSERTING ANY OBJECT INTO THE POWER POINT OTHER THAN THE 110 VAC ELECTRICAL DEVICE PLUG. 2. A CHILD LEAVING OUR VEHICLE HAD A FOOT ENTANGLED WITH A 3-PRONG CORD CONNECTED TO THE POWER POINT, RESULTING IN DISASSEMBLY OF THE SAFETY CAP FROM THE BODY OF THE POWER POINT. THE DISASSEMBLED POWER POINT EXPOSES TWO BRASS ELECTRICAL CONTACTS WITH 110 VAC. A PERSON ATTEMPTING TO REASSEMBLE THE SAFETY CAP WITH THE POWER POINT BODY WHILE THE ENGINE IS RUNNING MAY CONTACT THE HIGH VOLTAGE CONTACTS, RESULTING IN A BURN INJURY OR DEATH BY ELECTROCUTION. 3. THE POWER POINT SHOULD BE RECALLED AND REPLACED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE THAT CANNOT BE DISASSEMBLED. *TR
WHEN DRIVING THROUGH TOWN AT 25 MPH A WARNING SOUND AND TEXT "SERVICE STEERING SYSTEM NOW" CAME ON THE DASH AND STEERING WAS VERY DIFFICULT, REQUIRING ALL MY ARM STRENGTH TO STEER THE CAR AT LOW SPEEDS. I WAS ABLE TO PARK WITHOUT INCIDENT. I TURNED THE CAR OFF THEN BACK ON . THE SAME MESSAGE APPEARED. I DROVE THE CAR HOME, THEN …
Read full complaint
WHEN DRIVING THROUGH TOWN AT 25 MPH A WARNING SOUND AND TEXT "SERVICE STEERING SYSTEM NOW" CAME ON THE DASH AND STEERING WAS VERY DIFFICULT, REQUIRING ALL MY ARM STRENGTH TO STEER THE CAR AT LOW SPEEDS. I WAS ABLE TO PARK WITHOUT INCIDENT. I TURNED THE CAR OFF THEN BACK ON . THE SAME MESSAGE APPEARED. I DROVE THE CAR HOME, THEN THE NEXT DAY TO THE FORD DEALER WITH NO POWER STEERING AND LOTS OF PHYSICAL EFFORT TO KEEP THE CAR ON THE ROAD. HAD THIS OCCURRED THE PREVIOUS DAY WHEN I WAS ON I-66I IN NORTHERN VA , IT COULD HAVE BEEN VERY BAD. WHY WOULD THIS HAPPEN IN A 3 YEAR OLD CAR THAT COSTS 35K? *TR
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD FUSION. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE STEERING WHEEL SEIZED AND THE POWER STEERING ASSIST FAULT MESSAGE ILLUMINATED. THE FAILURE RECURRED NUMEROUS TIMES. THE DEALER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 84,000.
STEERING THE VEHICLE BECAME HARDER OVER THE WEEKEND. NOT SIGNIFICANTLY, BUT SOMEWHAT MORE DIFFICULT THAN NORMAL. IT FELT LIKE I WAS FIGHTING THE STEERING SOME. IT WANTED TO DO ONE THING AND I WANTED IT TO DO SOMETHING ELSE. BEFORE I WAS ABLE TO GET IT IN THE SHOP, THE STEERING BEGAN TO CATCH EACH TIME THE WHEEL WAS TURNED IN …
Read full complaint
STEERING THE VEHICLE BECAME HARDER OVER THE WEEKEND. NOT SIGNIFICANTLY, BUT SOMEWHAT MORE DIFFICULT THAN NORMAL. IT FELT LIKE I WAS FIGHTING THE STEERING SOME. IT WANTED TO DO ONE THING AND I WANTED IT TO DO SOMETHING ELSE. BEFORE I WAS ABLE TO GET IT IN THE SHOP, THE STEERING BEGAN TO CATCH EACH TIME THE WHEEL WAS TURNED IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION. IT DID NOT AFFECT DIRECTIONAL CONTROL, BUT WAS AN ANNOYANCE. THE STEERING WHEEL PRESSURE REQUIRED TO TURN REMAINED THE SAME AS AFTER THE INITIAL INCIDENT. WHEN TAKEN TO THE SHOP, THEY INDICATED THE ELECTRONIC STEERING CONTROL WAS MAKING A NOISE AND POSSIBLY CAUSING THE CATCHING AND RECOMMENDED I TAKE IT TO THE DEALER. THE DEALER REPLACED THE ENTIRE RACK AND PINION SYSTEM AND THE ASSOCIATED ELECTRONIC STEERING CONTROL AT SIGNIFICANT COST. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I HAVE EVER HAD STEERING ISSUES ON ANY CAR AND MOST OF MY VEHICLES ARE NOT REPLACED UNTIL CLOSE TO 200,000 MILES. I RESEARCHED THE ISSUE AND FOUND THAT NHTSA IS INVESTIGATING THE STEERING ON THE FUSION AND WANT TO PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION FOR THE INVESTIGATION. *TR
NORMAL DRIVING IN 55 MPH ZONE CAR SUDDENLY WOULD NOT ACCELERATE PAST 40 MPH. NOTICED WRENCH LIGHT ILLUMINATED. TURNED CAR AROUND AND PROCEEDED TOWARD HOME. ENGINE REVVED AT STOPPING BUT COULD NOT GET OUT OF WAY OF FAST TRAFFIC. ALMOST HIT IN REAR SEVERAL TIMES. FLASHER EMERGENCY LIGHTS NECESSARY. GOOGLED ISSUE TO SEE THAT IT I…
Read full complaint
NORMAL DRIVING IN 55 MPH ZONE CAR SUDDENLY WOULD NOT ACCELERATE PAST 40 MPH. NOTICED WRENCH LIGHT ILLUMINATED. TURNED CAR AROUND AND PROCEEDED TOWARD HOME. ENGINE REVVED AT STOPPING BUT COULD NOT GET OUT OF WAY OF FAST TRAFFIC. ALMOST HIT IN REAR SEVERAL TIMES. FLASHER EMERGENCY LIGHTS NECESSARY. GOOGLED ISSUE TO SEE THAT IT IS A DEFECT AND NHTSA HAS DECIDED TO LET FORD HANDLE RESOLUTION. FOX IN CHARGE OF THE HEN HOUSE AGAIN. THANKS AGAIN TO ANOTHER GOVERNMENT CONSUMER PROTECTION AGENCY THAT WILL NOT PROTECT US. CALLED FORD CORPORATE CUSTOMER SERVICE AND OF COURSE MY VEHICLE IS NOT PART OF THE FORD "CUSTOMER SATISFACTION" REPAIR. WHY AM I NOT SURPRISED? *TR
Official recalls
0No recalls in this snapshot.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
3DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds
Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System
NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.
PE14030 · Electric Power Steering Failure
Opened Oct 2, 2014 · Closed Sep 10, 2015
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Steering:electric Power Assist System
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a preliminary evaluation to investigate complaints of the loss of power steering while driving. The subject vehicles are equipped with a rack mounted Electric Power Assisted Steering (EPAS) unit.Some of the complaints alleged that the steering assist failed and resulted in increased steering efforts that contributed to a loss of control and in some cases a crash.The EPAS system was manufactured by TRW Automotive for Ford and was designated as Generation I.These units were first produced and put into vehicle production in July 2008 beginning with the model year (MY) 2010 Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan.The system is comprised of a mechanical steering rack-and-pinion gear with torque sensor, electric assist motor, motor position sensor and a power steering control module (PSCM). The PSCM is self-monitoring and designed to detect faults within the system and can store diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs) if a problem is detected.There are 29 potential DTCs the system can detect.Many of these allow the system to go into reduced-assist steering mode by using the default vehicle speed signal should the live speed signal be lost, if voltage to EPAS system falls below 10.7 or goes above 17 volts, the temperature at the PSCM goes above 105C (221F), or if high friction is detected.Some DTCs will cause the system to go into manual steering mode (no assist). On July 1, 2015, Ford filed a Defect Information Report (DIR) identifying a safety related defect in TRW GEN I EPAS systems installed in some of the subject vehicles (NHTSA Recall 15V-340, Ford No. 15S18).The DIR indicated that intermittent electrical connections caused by quality issues associated with conformal coat contamination and ribbon cable pin misalignment within the steering gear motor may lead to a loss of the motor position sensor signal, resulting in a sudden loss of power assist while driving.The recall covers approximately 393,623 vehicles built from September 2010 through February 2012:2011-12 Fusion built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012; 2011-12 Lincoln MKZ built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012; 2011 Milan built SEP 2010 - DEC 2010; 2011-13 Taurus built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012; 2011-13 Flex with 3.5L GTDI engine built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012; and 2011-13 MKS, MKT with 3.5L GTDI engine built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012.The repair consists of updating the PSCM software to prevent a loss of steering assist while driving. The revised software will provide audible and visual warnings to the driver. If one or more of the following DTCs are stored, C1B00-62, C200B-2F, C200B-61, C200B-62, C200C-2F, C200D-49, U0300-00, U2011-49, U2011-61, U3000-46, U3000-49, U3000-61, U3000-72, U3000-96, P07AE-09, the dealer will replace the EPAS system at no charge to the owner.ODI's analysis of failure data for this PE identified a total of 2,584 complaints to ODI and Ford and 9,967 Ford warranty claims related to the alleged defect.The recalled vehicles account for 1,634 of the complaints and 7,311 of the warranty claims.ODI's analysis identified 40 complaints alleging crashes that may be related to loss of steering assist while driving, 20 of which involved vehicles included in Ford's recall.The information available for the alleged crashes were not sufficient to assess specific causes of the incidents or to verify EPAS malfunctions in each case.Most of the crashes were low-speed impacts with curbs or roadside objects resulting in wheel or minor body damage.None of the injury claims indicated medical attention was required.In addition, statistical modeling of the failure data by NHTSA's National Center for Statistics and Analysis projected 10-year failur
EA12009 · Floor Mat Interference With Accelerator
Opened Dec 12, 2012 · Closed Jun 12, 2014
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Vehicle Speed Control; Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal
On May 27, 2014, Ford Motor Company submitted recall 14E-028 (Ford recall #14S07) to correct a safety-related problem with certain driver's side Ford optional all-weather floor mats sold for use in model year 2006 through 2011 model year Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Lincoln Zephyr, and Lincoln MKZ vehicles built at Hermosillo Assembly Plant (HAP) from November 9, 2007, to October 31 ,2010.NHTSA testing determined that the original accessory all-weather mat with a single retention clip (Figure 1), may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle with the mat retained by the clip and rotated clockwise.Both the single- and double-clip (Figure 2) all-weather floor mats may interfere with the accelerator pedal return to idle when the mats are not secured by the retention clip(s).Testing showed that this can occur if the mats are moved forward from the clipped position approximately two inches into a position in which the rear edge of the mats will abut the retention clip(s) when installed singly and align with the clip(s) when stacked on another floor mat.The pedal interference incidents reviewed by the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) include 1 crash and 9 incidents with allegations of brake friction materials smoking and/or requiring repair for heat related damage.The crash incident occurred after the parking brake was applied at speed, resulting in loss-of-control vehicle yaw event caused by lock-up of the rear tires.The spin-out resulted in a side impact collision with an oncoming vehicle in an opposing lane of traffic. For the 29 incidents with sufficient information available to make an assessment; 23 (79%) were controlled by the driver either shifting to neutral, turning the engine off, or both; 4 (14%) were ended by the driver either kicking the pedal free (2) or pulling the mat away from the pedal (2); and 2 (7%) were ended by the pedal freeing itself from the mat with no apparent driver action.None of the drivers who reacted to the incident by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off reported any difficulties with either action.The subject mats were sold by Ford and Lincoln dealers directly to customers as an optional accessory equipment item or, beginning in November 2007, the mats were also available as a factory installed accessory if ordered with a new vehicle.Ford estimates that approximately 82,579 affected driver's side all weather floor mats were sold worldwide; either over the counter through Ford dealerships or as original equipment.Owners that purchased the subject all-weather floor mats as a factory installed accessory with their new vehicle will be notified to return their all weather floor mats to their Ford or Lincoln Dealership in exchange for replacement mats.Owners of all other potentially affected vehicles will be notified that, if they have an affected Ford driver's side all weather floor mat, they should return their mats to the dealership in exchange for replacement mats.The VOQs associated with the closing of this investigation are: 10327597, 10332233, 10334211, 10335336, 10339330, 10348772 (and duplicate 10342572), 10372674, 10379562, 10415911, 10426255, 10434107, 10521053, 10554966.This investigation is hereby closed.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal
On May 27, 2014, Ford Motor Company submitted recall 14E-028 (Ford recall #14S07) to correct a safety-related problem with certain driver's side Ford optional all-weather floor mats sold for use in model year 2006 through 2011 model year Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Lincoln Zephyr, and Lincoln MKZ vehicles built at Hermosillo Assembly Plant (HAP) from November 9, 2007, to October 31 ,2010.NHTSA testing determined that the original accessory all-weather mat with a single retention clip (Figure 1), may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle with the mat retained by the clip and rotated clockwise.Both the single- and double-clip (Figure 2) all-weather floor mats may interfere with the accelerator pedal return to idle when the mats are not secured by the retention clip(s).Testing showed that this can occur if the mats are moved forward from the clipped position approximately two inches into a position in which the rear edge of the mats will abut the retention clip(s) when installed singly and align with the clip(s) when stacked on another floor mat.The pedal interference incidents reviewed by the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) include 1 crash and 9 incidents with allegations of brake friction materials smoking and/or requiring repair for heat related damage.The crash incident occurred after the parking brake was applied at speed, resulting in loss-of-control vehicle yaw event caused by lock-up of the rear tires.The spin-out resulted in a side impact collision with an oncoming vehicle in an opposing lane of traffic. For the 29 incidents with sufficient information available to make an assessment; 23 (79%) were controlled by the driver either shifting to neutral, turning the engine off, or both; 4 (14%) were ended by the driver either kicking the pedal free (2) or pulling the mat away from the pedal (2); and 2 (7%) were ended by the pedal freeing itself from the mat with no apparent driver action.None of the drivers who reacted to the incident by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off reported any difficulties with either action.The subject mats were sold by Ford and Lincoln dealers directly to customers as an optional accessory equipment item or, beginning in November 2007, the mats were also available as a factory installed accessory if ordered with a new vehicle.Ford estimates that approximately 82,579 affected driver's side all weather floor mats were sold worldwide; either over the counter through Ford dealerships or as original equipment.Owners that purchased the subject all-weather floor mats as a factory installed accessory with their new vehicle will be notified to return their all weather floor mats to their Ford or Lincoln Dealership in exchange for replacement mats.Owners of all other potentially affected vehicles will be notified that, if they have an affected Ford driver's side all weather floor mat, they should return their mats to the dealership in exchange for replacement mats.The VOQs associated with the closing of this investigation are: 10327597, 10332233, 10334211, 10335336, 10339330, 10348772 (and duplicate 10342572), 10372674, 10379562, 10415911, 10426255, 10434107, 10521053, 10554966.This investigation is hereby closed.
Vehicle Speed Control
On May 27, 2014, Ford Motor Company submitted recall 14E-028 (Ford recall #14S07) to correct a safety-related problem with certain driver's side Ford optional all-weather floor mats sold for use in model year 2006 through 2011 model year Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Lincoln Zephyr, and Lincoln MKZ vehicles built at Hermosillo Assembly Plant (HAP) from November 9, 2007, to October 31 ,2010.NHTSA testing determined that the original accessory all-weather mat with a single retention clip (Figure 1), may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle with the mat retained by the clip and rotated clockwise.Both the single- and double-clip (Figure 2) all-weather floor mats may interfere with the accelerator pedal return to idle when the mats are not secured by the retention clip(s).Testing showed that this can occur if the mats are moved forward from the clipped position approximately two inches into a position in which the rear edge of the mats will abut the retention clip(s) when installed singly and align with the clip(s) when stacked on another floor mat.The pedal interference incidents reviewed by the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) include 1 crash and 9 incidents with allegations of brake friction materials smoking and/or requiring repair for heat related damage.The crash incident occurred after the parking brake was applied at speed, resulting in loss-of-control vehicle yaw event caused by lock-up of the rear tires.The spin-out resulted in a side impact collision with an oncoming vehicle in an opposing lane of traffic. For the 29 incidents with sufficient information available to make an assessment; 23 (79%) were controlled by the driver either shifting to neutral, turning the engine off, or both; 4 (14%) were ended by the driver either kicking the pedal free (2) or pulling the mat away from the pedal (2); and 2 (7%) were ended by the pedal freeing itself from the mat with no apparent driver action.None of the drivers who reacted to the incident by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off reported any difficulties with either action.The subject mats were sold by Ford and Lincoln dealers directly to customers as an optional accessory equipment item or, beginning in November 2007, the mats were also available as a factory installed accessory if ordered with a new vehicle.Ford estimates that approximately 82,579 affected driver's side all weather floor mats were sold worldwide; either over the counter through Ford dealerships or as original equipment.Owners that purchased the subject all-weather floor mats as a factory installed accessory with their new vehicle will be notified to return their all weather floor mats to their Ford or Lincoln Dealership in exchange for replacement mats.Owners of all other potentially affected vehicles will be notified that, if they have an affected Ford driver's side all weather floor mat, they should return their mats to the dealership in exchange for replacement mats.The VOQs associated with the closing of this investigation are: 10327597, 10332233, 10334211, 10335336, 10339330, 10348772 (and duplicate 10342572), 10372674, 10379562, 10415911, 10426255, 10434107, 10521053, 10554966.This investigation is hereby closed.