NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
What owners actually said
132 reportsMileage unknown · Dec 23, 2015
Exterior Lighting
REPETITIVE HEADLIGHT LOW-BEAM BULBS APPEARING TO BE BURNT OUT; MECHANIC SAID THAT THE 'CONNECTOR' IS DISINTEGRATING. THIRD NEW BULB WAS INSTALLED 3 DAYS AGO; SINCE THEN WHEN HEADLIGHTS ARE ON LOW-BEAM, THE HEADLIGHTS COMES ON AND WITHIN MINUTES GOES OUT AND THEN WITHIN MINUTES GOES ON AGAIN; ETC. SO TO HAVE HEADLIGHTS WE NEED …
Read full complaint
REPETITIVE HEADLIGHT LOW-BEAM BULBS APPEARING TO BE BURNT OUT; MECHANIC SAID THAT THE 'CONNECTOR' IS DISINTEGRATING. THIRD NEW BULB WAS INSTALLED 3 DAYS AGO; SINCE THEN WHEN HEADLIGHTS ARE ON LOW-BEAM, THE HEADLIGHTS COMES ON AND WITHIN MINUTES GOES OUT AND THEN WITHIN MINUTES GOES ON AGAIN; ETC. SO TO HAVE HEADLIGHTS WE NEED TO RUN ON HIGH BEAM. THIS OCCURS AT ALL TIMES WHEN USING HEADLIGHTS WHETHER THE VEHICLE IS STATIONARY OR IN MOTION.
NHTSA ODI #10812007
97,400 miles · Dec 18, 2015
Electrical SystemEnginePower Train
WHEN DECELERATING, MY CAR SOMETIMES "JERKS", ACCOMPANIED BY MULTIPLE WARNING LIGHTS AND--DANGEROUSLY--A TOTAL LOSS OF ENGINE POWER. THE CAR GOES DEAD, IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD, AND HAS TO BE RESTARTED BY REMOVING THE KEY AND REINSERTING IT. THIS COULD CAUSE A COLLISION BOTH FROM BEHIND (BY SOMEONE WHO DOESN'T REALIZE THAT THE C…
Read full complaint
WHEN DECELERATING, MY CAR SOMETIMES "JERKS", ACCOMPANIED BY MULTIPLE WARNING LIGHTS AND--DANGEROUSLY--A TOTAL LOSS OF ENGINE POWER. THE CAR GOES DEAD, IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD, AND HAS TO BE RESTARTED BY REMOVING THE KEY AND REINSERTING IT. THIS COULD CAUSE A COLLISION BOTH FROM BEHIND (BY SOMEONE WHO DOESN'T REALIZE THAT THE CAR HAS JUST "DIED"--ESPECIALLY AT NIGHT), AS WELL AS THE "JERK" POTENTIALLY CAUSING ME TO COLLIDE WITH SOMEONE IN FRONT. MY DEALERSHIP TOLD ME THAT FORD HAD "PUT OUT A BULLETIN" REGARDING THIS ISSUE, WHICH CALLED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A NEW WIRING HARNESS. AND YET--INEXPLICABLY GIVEN THAT THIS IS A SAFETY HAZARD--THIS APPARENTLY "KNOWN" ISSUE IS NOT TREATED AS A RECALL, WITH ME BEING CHARGED MORE THAN $500 FOR PARTS AND LABOR. I'VE SEEN NUMEROUS REPORTS OF PEOPLE WITH THE SAME ISSUE, MANY WITH LESS MILEAGE THAN MYSELF (97,000), SO I'M SHOCKED THAT A RECALL HASN'T HAPPENED, ESPECIALLY GIVEN THE DANGER THAT THIS ISSUE POSES TO THE CAR'S OCCUPANTS AND THOSE NEARBY.
NHTSA ODI #10811127
40,799 miles · Dec 17, 2015
Electronic Stability Control (esc)Power TrainSteering
POWER STEERING AND ADVANCETRAC FAILED DURING DRIVING. THE STEERING WHEEL SUDDENLY BECAME VERY HARD TO TURN. I BARELY COULD AVOID A COLLISION. IN AN EARLIER EVENT, THE HYBRID SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONED AND THE CAR ACCELERATED WITH MAXIMUM ELECTRIC POWER DESPITE THE FOOT BEING OFF THE ACCELERATOR. THE VEHICLE COULD BE STOPPED AND AND…
Read full complaint
POWER STEERING AND ADVANCETRAC FAILED DURING DRIVING. THE STEERING WHEEL SUDDENLY BECAME VERY HARD TO TURN. I BARELY COULD AVOID A COLLISION. IN AN EARLIER EVENT, THE HYBRID SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONED AND THE CAR ACCELERATED WITH MAXIMUM ELECTRIC POWER DESPITE THE FOOT BEING OFF THE ACCELERATOR. THE VEHICLE COULD BE STOPPED AND AND WORKED AGAIN NORMALLY AFTER TURNING OFF THE IGNITION KEY.
NHTSA ODI #10811046
95,000 miles · Dec 14, 2015
Steering
WHILE DRIVING 35-40 MPH IN THE CITY, THE SERVICE ADVANCETRAC AND SERVICE POWER STEERING NOW LIGHTS CAME ON AS WELL AS TCS OFF AND TCS ON INDICATORS AND IT WAS BECOMING HARDER TO DRIVE. ONCE I REACHED MY DESTINATION AND I RESTARTED THE CAR I HAD NO POWER STEERING ASSIST. THIS IS THE SECOND OCCASION. FIRST TIME MY BOYFRIEND WAS DR…
Read full complaint
WHILE DRIVING 35-40 MPH IN THE CITY, THE SERVICE ADVANCETRAC AND SERVICE POWER STEERING NOW LIGHTS CAME ON AS WELL AS TCS OFF AND TCS ON INDICATORS AND IT WAS BECOMING HARDER TO DRIVE. ONCE I REACHED MY DESTINATION AND I RESTARTED THE CAR I HAD NO POWER STEERING ASSIST. THIS IS THE SECOND OCCASION. FIRST TIME MY BOYFRIEND WAS DRIVING 11/20/15 AND DESCRIBED THE SAME OCCURANCES. IT WAS TAKEN TO A FORD DEALER FT WAYNE INDIANA AND WAS TOLD IT WAS THE STEERING GEAR. THIS WAS REPLACED AND IVE LEARNED THAT ITS BEEN PART OF A RECALL. SO $1700 LATER IT WAS FINE. PICKED UP MY VEHICLE DEC 1 THEN THE SECOND OCCURANCE WAS JUST 10 DAYS LATER ON DEC 11. TAKEN TO THE DEALER ONCE AGAIN. THE DEALER CLEARED THE CODES AND RECALIBRATED AND POWER STEERING WAS BACK BUT NOW IM TOLD THE CONTROL ARMS CAUSED IT THIS TIME.
NHTSA ODI #10809948
51,000 miles · Nov 16, 2015
Electrical SystemEngine
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD FUSION HYBRID. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE COMING TO A STOP, THE VEHICLE STALLED AND VARIOUS WARNING LIGHTS ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT MENTIONED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS ABLE TO START AFTER MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS. THE FAILURE RECURRED INTERMITTENTLY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSE…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD FUSION HYBRID. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE COMING TO A STOP, THE VEHICLE STALLED AND VARIOUS WARNING LIGHTS ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT MENTIONED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS ABLE TO START AFTER MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS. THE FAILURE RECURRED INTERMITTENTLY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE ELECTRONIC COOLING PUMP FAILED AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED, BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 51,000.
NHTSA ODI #10790616
36,000 miles · Sep 18, 2015
Equipment Adaptive/mobilityCrashInjury
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD FUSION HYBRID. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO PARK, THE VEHICLE SURGED FORWARD WITHOUT THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL BEING DEPRESSED, CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO CRASH INTO A GUARD RAIL. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 14E028000 (EQUIPMENT). THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLO…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD FUSION HYBRID. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO PARK, THE VEHICLE SURGED FORWARD WITHOUT THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL BEING DEPRESSED, CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO CRASH INTO A GUARD RAIL. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 14E028000 (EQUIPMENT). THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRONT SEAT PASSENGER SUSTAINED INJURIES TO THE HEAD AND FACE THAT REQUIRED MEDICAL ATTENTION. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO INDEPENDENT MECHANIC BUT WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 36,000.
NHTSA ODI #10765115
Mileage unknown · Sep 4, 2015
EngineFuel/propulsion SystemPower Train
WHILE DRIVING FROM LOS ANGELES TO PHOENIX IN THE SUMMER, THE CAR SUDDENLY FLASHED A RED WARNING LIGHT, AND SHUT THE ENGINE OFF WITH THE CAR MOVING AT FREEWAY SPEED. AFTER PULLING TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD, AND TURNING THE ENGINE OFF AND ON AGAIN, THE CAR GAVE NO INDICATION THAT SOMETHING HAD HAPPENED. IT SHUT OFF AGAIN TEN MILES L…
Read full complaint
WHILE DRIVING FROM LOS ANGELES TO PHOENIX IN THE SUMMER, THE CAR SUDDENLY FLASHED A RED WARNING LIGHT, AND SHUT THE ENGINE OFF WITH THE CAR MOVING AT FREEWAY SPEED. AFTER PULLING TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD, AND TURNING THE ENGINE OFF AND ON AGAIN, THE CAR GAVE NO INDICATION THAT SOMETHING HAD HAPPENED. IT SHUT OFF AGAIN TEN MILES LATER, AND AGAIN, AND AGAIN. I TURNED AROUND AND BROUGHT THE CAR HOME AND TOOK IT TO A DEALER. THEY REPLACED THE HYBRID COMPUTER, BUT IT DID THE SAME THING AGAIN DRIVING TO LAS VEGAS A FEW MONTHS LATER. THE DEALER CLEANED THE THROTTLE BODY, AND SAID EVERYTHING WAS GOOD. IT HAS SINCE DONE IT AGAIN AND AGAIN, SOMETIMES JUST MERGING ONTO THE FREEWAY NEAR MY HOME. REPEATEDLY, THE CAR HAS LOST POWER - USUALLY ON THE FREEWAY, AND OFTEN WITH MY FAMILY IN THE CAR. I TRY NOT TO LET MY WIFE DRIVE IT AT THIS POINT, BECAUSE I'M WORRIED THAT SHE'LL EITHER GET STRANDED WITH THE KIDS, OR GET HIT BY SOMEONE WHEN THE CAR SHUTS OFF ON THE FREEWAY. WE NO LONGER DRIVE IT SIGNIFICANT DISTANCES.
NHTSA ODI #10761432
61,000 miles · Jul 21, 2015
Fuel/propulsion System
LOST POWER ON HIGHWAY
NHTSA ODI #10735471
55,003 miles · Jul 7, 2015
Electronic Stability Control (esc)Steering
LOST POWER STEERING AND THE ADVANCE TRACK SYSTEM. THE STEERING WHEEL WAS TO HARD TO TURN FOR MY WIFE AND MADE THE CAR UNDRIVEABLE. IT WAS TRAILERED TO A DEALER FOR REPAIR. THIS A COMMON PROBLEM FOR THIS YEAR AND VERY COSTLY TO FIX.
NHTSA ODI #10732591
56,280 miles · Jun 5, 2015
Service Brakes
IN A SHOPPING PLAZA WENT TO STOP AT A STOP SIGN AND BRAKES BECAME SPONGY AND CAR WAS VERY DIFFICULT TO STOP WHERE NORMALLY EXPECTED. WHEN FINALLY STOPPED IT SEEMED TO WANT TO LURCH AHEAD DASHBOARD HAD A RED " BRAKE SERVICE" WARNING LIGHT AND THEN A NUMBER A NUMBER OF YELLOW WARNINGS APPEARED. HAPPENED AGAIN AT ANOTHER STOP SIGN …
Read full complaint
IN A SHOPPING PLAZA WENT TO STOP AT A STOP SIGN AND BRAKES BECAME SPONGY AND CAR WAS VERY DIFFICULT TO STOP WHERE NORMALLY EXPECTED. WHEN FINALLY STOPPED IT SEEMED TO WANT TO LURCH AHEAD DASHBOARD HAD A RED " BRAKE SERVICE" WARNING LIGHT AND THEN A NUMBER A NUMBER OF YELLOW WARNINGS APPEARED. HAPPENED AGAIN AT ANOTHER STOP SIGN ON MY WAY HOME. DROVE TO THE NEAREST DEALER WHERE CAR IS SERVICED AND THEY PULLED A CODE C1012 MEMORY CONTINUOUS CODE. THEY COULD NOT RECREATE THE PROBLEM AND RELEASED THE CAR BACK TO ME. IN SEP 2015 CAR HAD SOFTWARE UPDATED AFTER A " TOOL" KEPT APPEARING. AFTER YOU TURNED OFF CAR THEY BRAKES SEEMED TO WORK OK. I'M CONCERNED IF THIS HAPPENS ON FREEWAY.
NHTSA ODI #10723604
NHTSA investigations
3DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds
Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System
NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.
PE14030 · Electric Power Steering Failure
Opened Oct 2, 2014 · Closed Sep 10, 2015
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Steering:electric Power Assist System
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a preliminary evaluation to investigate complaints of the loss of power steering while driving. The subject vehicles are equipped with a rack mounted Electric Power Assisted Steering (EPAS) unit.Some of the complaints alleged that the steering assist failed and resulted in increased steering efforts that contributed to a loss of control and in some cases a crash.The EPAS system was manufactured by TRW Automotive for Ford and was designated as Generation I.These units were first produced and put into vehicle production in July 2008 beginning with the model year (MY) 2010 Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan.The system is comprised of a mechanical steering rack-and-pinion gear with torque sensor, electric assist motor, motor position sensor and a power steering control module (PSCM). The PSCM is self-monitoring and designed to detect faults within the system and can store diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs) if a problem is detected.There are 29 potential DTCs the system can detect.Many of these allow the system to go into reduced-assist steering mode by using the default vehicle speed signal should the live speed signal be lost, if voltage to EPAS system falls below 10.7 or goes above 17 volts, the temperature at the PSCM goes above 105C (221F), or if high friction is detected.Some DTCs will cause the system to go into manual steering mode (no assist). On July 1, 2015, Ford filed a Defect Information Report (DIR) identifying a safety related defect in TRW GEN I EPAS systems installed in some of the subject vehicles (NHTSA Recall 15V-340, Ford No. 15S18).The DIR indicated that intermittent electrical connections caused by quality issues associated with conformal coat contamination and ribbon cable pin misalignment within the steering gear motor may lead to a loss of the motor position sensor signal, resulting in a sudden loss of power assist while driving.The recall covers approximately 393,623 vehicles built from September 2010 through February 2012:2011-12 Fusion built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012; 2011-12 Lincoln MKZ built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012; 2011 Milan built SEP 2010 - DEC 2010; 2011-13 Taurus built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012; 2011-13 Flex with 3.5L GTDI engine built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012; and 2011-13 MKS, MKT with 3.5L GTDI engine built SEP 2010 - FEB 2012.The repair consists of updating the PSCM software to prevent a loss of steering assist while driving. The revised software will provide audible and visual warnings to the driver. If one or more of the following DTCs are stored, C1B00-62, C200B-2F, C200B-61, C200B-62, C200C-2F, C200D-49, U0300-00, U2011-49, U2011-61, U3000-46, U3000-49, U3000-61, U3000-72, U3000-96, P07AE-09, the dealer will replace the EPAS system at no charge to the owner.ODI's analysis of failure data for this PE identified a total of 2,584 complaints to ODI and Ford and 9,967 Ford warranty claims related to the alleged defect.The recalled vehicles account for 1,634 of the complaints and 7,311 of the warranty claims.ODI's analysis identified 40 complaints alleging crashes that may be related to loss of steering assist while driving, 20 of which involved vehicles included in Ford's recall.The information available for the alleged crashes were not sufficient to assess specific causes of the incidents or to verify EPAS malfunctions in each case.Most of the crashes were low-speed impacts with curbs or roadside objects resulting in wheel or minor body damage.None of the injury claims indicated medical attention was required.In addition, statistical modeling of the failure data by NHTSA's National Center for Statistics and Analysis projected 10-year failur
EA12009 · Floor Mat Interference With Accelerator
Opened Dec 12, 2012 · Closed Jun 12, 2014
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Vehicle Speed Control; Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal
On May 27, 2014, Ford Motor Company submitted recall 14E-028 (Ford recall #14S07) to correct a safety-related problem with certain driver's side Ford optional all-weather floor mats sold for use in model year 2006 through 2011 model year Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Lincoln Zephyr, and Lincoln MKZ vehicles built at Hermosillo Assembly Plant (HAP) from November 9, 2007, to October 31 ,2010.NHTSA testing determined that the original accessory all-weather mat with a single retention clip (Figure 1), may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle with the mat retained by the clip and rotated clockwise.Both the single- and double-clip (Figure 2) all-weather floor mats may interfere with the accelerator pedal return to idle when the mats are not secured by the retention clip(s).Testing showed that this can occur if the mats are moved forward from the clipped position approximately two inches into a position in which the rear edge of the mats will abut the retention clip(s) when installed singly and align with the clip(s) when stacked on another floor mat.The pedal interference incidents reviewed by the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) include 1 crash and 9 incidents with allegations of brake friction materials smoking and/or requiring repair for heat related damage.The crash incident occurred after the parking brake was applied at speed, resulting in loss-of-control vehicle yaw event caused by lock-up of the rear tires.The spin-out resulted in a side impact collision with an oncoming vehicle in an opposing lane of traffic. For the 29 incidents with sufficient information available to make an assessment; 23 (79%) were controlled by the driver either shifting to neutral, turning the engine off, or both; 4 (14%) were ended by the driver either kicking the pedal free (2) or pulling the mat away from the pedal (2); and 2 (7%) were ended by the pedal freeing itself from the mat with no apparent driver action.None of the drivers who reacted to the incident by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off reported any difficulties with either action.The subject mats were sold by Ford and Lincoln dealers directly to customers as an optional accessory equipment item or, beginning in November 2007, the mats were also available as a factory installed accessory if ordered with a new vehicle.Ford estimates that approximately 82,579 affected driver's side all weather floor mats were sold worldwide; either over the counter through Ford dealerships or as original equipment.Owners that purchased the subject all-weather floor mats as a factory installed accessory with their new vehicle will be notified to return their all weather floor mats to their Ford or Lincoln Dealership in exchange for replacement mats.Owners of all other potentially affected vehicles will be notified that, if they have an affected Ford driver's side all weather floor mat, they should return their mats to the dealership in exchange for replacement mats.The VOQs associated with the closing of this investigation are: 10327597, 10332233, 10334211, 10335336, 10339330, 10348772 (and duplicate 10342572), 10372674, 10379562, 10415911, 10426255, 10434107, 10521053, 10554966.This investigation is hereby closed.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal
On May 27, 2014, Ford Motor Company submitted recall 14E-028 (Ford recall #14S07) to correct a safety-related problem with certain driver's side Ford optional all-weather floor mats sold for use in model year 2006 through 2011 model year Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Lincoln Zephyr, and Lincoln MKZ vehicles built at Hermosillo Assembly Plant (HAP) from November 9, 2007, to October 31 ,2010.NHTSA testing determined that the original accessory all-weather mat with a single retention clip (Figure 1), may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle with the mat retained by the clip and rotated clockwise.Both the single- and double-clip (Figure 2) all-weather floor mats may interfere with the accelerator pedal return to idle when the mats are not secured by the retention clip(s).Testing showed that this can occur if the mats are moved forward from the clipped position approximately two inches into a position in which the rear edge of the mats will abut the retention clip(s) when installed singly and align with the clip(s) when stacked on another floor mat.The pedal interference incidents reviewed by the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) include 1 crash and 9 incidents with allegations of brake friction materials smoking and/or requiring repair for heat related damage.The crash incident occurred after the parking brake was applied at speed, resulting in loss-of-control vehicle yaw event caused by lock-up of the rear tires.The spin-out resulted in a side impact collision with an oncoming vehicle in an opposing lane of traffic. For the 29 incidents with sufficient information available to make an assessment; 23 (79%) were controlled by the driver either shifting to neutral, turning the engine off, or both; 4 (14%) were ended by the driver either kicking the pedal free (2) or pulling the mat away from the pedal (2); and 2 (7%) were ended by the pedal freeing itself from the mat with no apparent driver action.None of the drivers who reacted to the incident by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off reported any difficulties with either action.The subject mats were sold by Ford and Lincoln dealers directly to customers as an optional accessory equipment item or, beginning in November 2007, the mats were also available as a factory installed accessory if ordered with a new vehicle.Ford estimates that approximately 82,579 affected driver's side all weather floor mats were sold worldwide; either over the counter through Ford dealerships or as original equipment.Owners that purchased the subject all-weather floor mats as a factory installed accessory with their new vehicle will be notified to return their all weather floor mats to their Ford or Lincoln Dealership in exchange for replacement mats.Owners of all other potentially affected vehicles will be notified that, if they have an affected Ford driver's side all weather floor mat, they should return their mats to the dealership in exchange for replacement mats.The VOQs associated with the closing of this investigation are: 10327597, 10332233, 10334211, 10335336, 10339330, 10348772 (and duplicate 10342572), 10372674, 10379562, 10415911, 10426255, 10434107, 10521053, 10554966.This investigation is hereby closed.
Vehicle Speed Control
On May 27, 2014, Ford Motor Company submitted recall 14E-028 (Ford recall #14S07) to correct a safety-related problem with certain driver's side Ford optional all-weather floor mats sold for use in model year 2006 through 2011 model year Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Lincoln Zephyr, and Lincoln MKZ vehicles built at Hermosillo Assembly Plant (HAP) from November 9, 2007, to October 31 ,2010.NHTSA testing determined that the original accessory all-weather mat with a single retention clip (Figure 1), may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle with the mat retained by the clip and rotated clockwise.Both the single- and double-clip (Figure 2) all-weather floor mats may interfere with the accelerator pedal return to idle when the mats are not secured by the retention clip(s).Testing showed that this can occur if the mats are moved forward from the clipped position approximately two inches into a position in which the rear edge of the mats will abut the retention clip(s) when installed singly and align with the clip(s) when stacked on another floor mat.The pedal interference incidents reviewed by the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) include 1 crash and 9 incidents with allegations of brake friction materials smoking and/or requiring repair for heat related damage.The crash incident occurred after the parking brake was applied at speed, resulting in loss-of-control vehicle yaw event caused by lock-up of the rear tires.The spin-out resulted in a side impact collision with an oncoming vehicle in an opposing lane of traffic. For the 29 incidents with sufficient information available to make an assessment; 23 (79%) were controlled by the driver either shifting to neutral, turning the engine off, or both; 4 (14%) were ended by the driver either kicking the pedal free (2) or pulling the mat away from the pedal (2); and 2 (7%) were ended by the pedal freeing itself from the mat with no apparent driver action.None of the drivers who reacted to the incident by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off reported any difficulties with either action.The subject mats were sold by Ford and Lincoln dealers directly to customers as an optional accessory equipment item or, beginning in November 2007, the mats were also available as a factory installed accessory if ordered with a new vehicle.Ford estimates that approximately 82,579 affected driver's side all weather floor mats were sold worldwide; either over the counter through Ford dealerships or as original equipment.Owners that purchased the subject all-weather floor mats as a factory installed accessory with their new vehicle will be notified to return their all weather floor mats to their Ford or Lincoln Dealership in exchange for replacement mats.Owners of all other potentially affected vehicles will be notified that, if they have an affected Ford driver's side all weather floor mat, they should return their mats to the dealership in exchange for replacement mats.The VOQs associated with the closing of this investigation are: 10327597, 10332233, 10334211, 10335336, 10339330, 10348772 (and duplicate 10342572), 10372674, 10379562, 10415911, 10426255, 10434107, 10521053, 10554966.This investigation is hereby closed.
Illustration