SkipThatYearREAL DATA. SMARTER CAR DECISIONS.
← New search

2016 Ford C-MAX Energi

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2016 Ford C-MAX Energi do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 30.

About this comparison →
32Owner complaints

Model-year median: 30

0Recall campaigns

View recall details →

1Investigations

View investigation details →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
50
201330
201415
201532
201610
2017
Compare all C-MAX Energi years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

Electrical System
13Power Train
5Back Over Prevention
4Engine
3Steering
3
All reported categories
Unknown Or Other
3Structure
2Vehicle Speed Control
2Wheels
2Electronic Stability Control (esc)
1Equipment
1Exterior Lighting
1Lane Departure
1Seat Belts
1

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

22 reports with mileage · 10 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Electrical System. Review the 13 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Power Train. Review the 5 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Back Over Prevention. Review the 4 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

5 crash reports0 fire reports2 injury reports

Electronic Stability Control (esc) complaints

1 reports
Clear category filter
13,000 miles · Jan 4, 2017
Electrical SystemElectronic Stability Control (esc)Unknown Or Other

I ENTERED THE CAR AND TRIED TO START. IMMEDIATELY IT FAILED TO START AND WARNING LIGHTS CAME ON SAYING NOT TO DRIVE THE CAR THEN IT WENT DARK AND I AM NOT CERTAIN IF THE CAR IS RUNNING OR NOT. I WAS UNABLE TO DRIVE IT AT ALL AND HAD TO GET IT TOWED TO THE DEALER. THIS IS THE SECOND TIME I HAVE HAD RODENT DAMAGE SINCE I BOUGH…

Read full complaint

I ENTERED THE CAR AND TRIED TO START. IMMEDIATELY IT FAILED TO START AND WARNING LIGHTS CAME ON SAYING NOT TO DRIVE THE CAR THEN IT WENT DARK AND I AM NOT CERTAIN IF THE CAR IS RUNNING OR NOT. I WAS UNABLE TO DRIVE IT AT ALL AND HAD TO GET IT TOWED TO THE DEALER. THIS IS THE SECOND TIME I HAVE HAD RODENT DAMAGE SINCE I BOUGHT THE CAR NEW. FIRST TIME WAS IN AUGUST 2016.

NHTSA ODI #10939733

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds

Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System

NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.