← New search

2000 Chevrolet S10

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most S10 years

Owner complaints for the 2000 Chevrolet S10 are substantially higher than the model-year median of 42.5.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

199 reports with mileage · 272 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Structure. Review the 93 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 92 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Seats. Review the 55 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

52 crash reports8 fire reports39 injury reports

What owners actually said

471 reports
Mileage unknown · May 3, 2002
Seats

PASSENGER SIDE SEAT FAILS TO LOCK AND SLAMS FOREWARD UPON DECELERATION, THIS IS A DESIGN FUNCTION ACCORDING TO BARTOW CHEVROLET , SEAT MUST BE FORCEFULLY SLAMMED BACK, TO IT'S FULL REAR POSITION IN ORDER TO LOCK ANYWHERE ON THE SLIDING CARRIAGE IF THE SEAT HAS BEEN TILTED FOREWARD TO ACCESS THE REAR STORAGE AREA I.E. INSTALL CH…

Read full complaint

PASSENGER SIDE SEAT FAILS TO LOCK AND SLAMS FOREWARD UPON DECELERATION, THIS IS A DESIGN FUNCTION ACCORDING TO BARTOW CHEVROLET , SEAT MUST BE FORCEFULLY SLAMMED BACK, TO IT'S FULL REAR POSITION IN ORDER TO LOCK ANYWHERE ON THE SLIDING CARRIAGE IF THE SEAT HAS BEEN TILTED FOREWARD TO ACCESS THE REAR STORAGE AREA I.E. INSTALL CHILD IN REAR SEAT , SLAM PASSENGER SEAT FULLY BACK, OR IT WILL NOT LOCK AND WILL SLIDE PASSENGER INTO DASHBOARD WHEN DECELERATING ,EVEN AN ADULT WOULD PROBABLY NOT SURVIVE AN AIRBAG DEPLOYMENT AT POINT BLANK RANGE. *AK

NHTSA ODI #761486

Mileage unknown · Apr 29, 2002
Vehicle Speed Control

WHILE TRAVELING ON HIGHWAY THROTTLE BECOMES STUCK WITHOUT PRIOR WARNING. DEALERSHIP IS AWARE OF PROBLEM.*AKWHILE SLOWING DOWN TO EXIT THE FREEWAY, VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED TO A SPEED WELL OVER 50 MPH. EVEN WITH CONSUMERS FOOT OFF THE GAS VEHICLE STILL ACCELERATED. CONSUMER HAD TO SHUT THE VEHICLE OFF TO STOP. TOOK VEHIC…

Read full complaint

WHILE TRAVELING ON HIGHWAY THROTTLE BECOMES STUCK WITHOUT PRIOR WARNING. DEALERSHIP IS AWARE OF PROBLEM.*AKWHILE SLOWING DOWN TO EXIT THE FREEWAY, VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED TO A SPEED WELL OVER 50 MPH. EVEN WITH CONSUMERS FOOT OFF THE GAS VEHICLE STILL ACCELERATED. CONSUMER HAD TO SHUT THE VEHICLE OFF TO STOP. TOOK VEHICLE TO MECHANIC AND WAS INFORMED THE THROTTLE PLATE BOLTS HAD COME OUT OF THE THROTTLE PLATE CAUSING THE THROTTLE TO LOCK IN AN OPEN POSITION. *JG

NHTSA ODI #8008805

Mileage unknown · Apr 24, 2002
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

BRAKES ARE FAILING WHEN I STOP IT WON'T STOP SOMETIMES.*AK

NHTSA ODI #761133

Mileage unknown · Mar 19, 2002
Exterior Lighting

MULTI-FUNCTION SWITCH FAILED THREE TIMES, SHORTING OUT BATTERY AND BRAKE LIGHTS. COULD NOT CHARGE BATTERY. *AK *TT

NHTSA ODI #8005949

Mileage unknown · Mar 13, 2002
Air BagsCrashInjury

VEHICLE WAS INVOLVED IN A FRONTAL COLLISION AT ABOUT 35-40 MPH AND NEITHER AIR BAG DEPLOYED. DEALER AND MANUFACTURER WERE NOT NOTIFIED, THERE WAS ONE INJURY. *AK *YH

NHTSA ODI #8005563

Mileage unknown · Mar 12, 2002
Exterior Lighting

WHILE DRIVING HEADLIGHTS FLICKER, LESS THAN A SECOND. THEN, THEY HAVE GONE COMPLETELY OUT. DEALER STATED IT WAS NORMAL. *AK

NHTSA ODI #8005411

Mileage unknown · Feb 28, 2002
Exterior LightingSeat BeltsSeats

WHILE DRIVING, HEAD LIGHTS FLICKERED ON AND OFF, AND HAVE GONE COMPLETELY OUT WITHOUT COMING BACK ON. DEALER STATED IT WAS NORMAL AND THERE WAS NO FIX. *AK CONSUMER STATES THE SEAT BELT WAS JAMMED, AND ALSO THE PASSENGER SEAT WOULD NOT LOCK INTO PLACE *YH

NHTSA ODI #8004762

Mileage unknown · Feb 27, 2002
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

BOTH REAR HYDRAULIC BRAKE LINES RUPTURED AT THE FLARE FITTING ENTERING EACH CALIPER WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF EACH OTHER. THE DEALER WAS UNABLE TO REPLACE THE FIRST ONE, RIGHT REAR, BECAUSE CHEVROLET INFORMED THEM THAT "THE PART DID NOT EXIST!" THE DEALER WAS FORCED TO REFLARE THE OLD LINE. WITHIN 1 WEEK, IT BROKE AGAIN IN THE SAME SPOT…

Read full complaint

BOTH REAR HYDRAULIC BRAKE LINES RUPTURED AT THE FLARE FITTING ENTERING EACH CALIPER WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF EACH OTHER. THE DEALER WAS UNABLE TO REPLACE THE FIRST ONE, RIGHT REAR, BECAUSE CHEVROLET INFORMED THEM THAT "THE PART DID NOT EXIST!" THE DEALER WAS FORCED TO REFLARE THE OLD LINE. WITHIN 1 WEEK, IT BROKE AGAIN IN THE SAME SPOT. I REPLACED THE LINE WITH AN AFTERMARKET ONE MYSELF. LESS THAN A WEEK LATER, THE OTHER REAR BRAKE LINE (LEFT REAR) RUPTURED AT THE FLARE IN THE SAME SPOT AS THE RIGHT REAR, ENTERING THE CALIPER. I REPLACED IT MYSELF AND TOOK THE OEM BROKEN LINE TO VIVA MOTORS TO INFORM THEM TO INFORM CHEVROLET THAT THERE WAS A POTENTIAL SERIOUS DEFECT IN CHEVROLET S-10 REAR BRAKE LINES. THE SERVICE MANAGER ADVISED ME TO CALL CHEVROLET MYSELF SINCE THEY (CHEVROLET) WOULDN'T LISTEN TO HIM. SINCE CHEVROLET'S SOUTHWEST AREA ZONE REPRESENTATIVE HAD PREVIOUSLY TOLD ME TO "GO POUND SAND" I FIGURED WHY BOTHER WITH HIM. I FEEL THE ODDS OF TWO OEM BRAKE LINES FAILING WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF EACH OTHER ARE ASTRONOMICAL AND SINCE CHEVROLET CHOSE TO IGNORE THE INCIDENTS, I'D BETTER CONTACT YOU TO INVESTIGATE FURTHER. HOPEFULLY, MINE WAS AN ISOLATED CASE BUT I DOUBT IT BECAUSE AS I SAID, THE ODDS ARE ASTRONOMICAL AND THE SW AREA ZONE REP CHOSE TO SAY THE PART DIDN'T EXIST RATHER THAN ADMIT HE HAD A SERIOUS LIFE THREATENING PROBLEM. IN REALITY, HOW CAN HE SAY THE TRUCK NEVER HAD BRAKE LINES? I SMELL A RAT AND WOULD LIKE YOUR ORGANIZATION TO CHECK INTO IT. IF FURTHER INVESTIGATION SAVES 1 LIFE, THIS IS WELL WORTH OUR EFFORTS. FORTUNATELY, I WAS ABLE TO STOP SAFELY BOTH TIMES MY HYDRAULIC SYSTEM SUFFERED MASSIVE FAILURES BUT I WILL SAY, I THINK THE FAILURES TOOK A FEW YEARS OFF MY LIFE AND ABSOLUTELY CAUSED SOME SOILED PANTS. I'M NOT A CHRONIC COMPLAINER BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION BUT I'M NOT STUPID EITHER AND CHEVROLET HAS PROBLEM WITH AT LEAST ONE OF ITS TRUCKS AND IS CHOOSING TO HIDE ITS HEAD IN THE SAND IT WANTS ME TO GO POUND. THANKS FOR YOUR EFFORTS, JOHN MULLEN. *AK

NHTSA ODI #758730

Mileage unknown · Feb 19, 2002
Engine And Engine Cooling

CONSUMER STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING HE HERD BIG THUMP BEFORE HE LOST STEERING, CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO LEAVE THE ROADWAY, COULD NOT STOP THE VEHICLE WITH THE BRAKES, VEHICLE RAN INTO A TREE, CONSUMER STATED THE PULLY SHEARED OFF FROM ENGINE. *YD

NHTSA ODI #564377

Mileage unknown · Feb 15, 2002
Air BagsService Brakes, HydraulicCrash

MY SON WENT OVER A BRIDGE AND THE BRAKES MADE A LOUD NOISE, ENGAGED AND CAUSED HIM TO FISHTAIL AND RUN HIS FRONT END INTO THE BRIDGE. HE HAD A WITNESS BEHIND HIM THAT SAW THE WHOLE THING AND SAID IT WAS VERY SCARY AND A GOOD THING THERE WAS NO ONCOMING TRAFFIC. IT DID $2300 WORTH OF DAMAGE AND HIS AIRBAGS DID NOT EMPLOY. *AK

NHTSA ODI #758282

Official recalls

4

00V258001 · Equipment:other:labels

Sep 8, 2000

VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: LIGHT DUTY PICKUP TRUCKS AND SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES. SOME OF THESE VEHICLES WERE BUILT WITH INCORRECT PAYLOAD INFORMATION ON THE VEHICLE CERTIFICATION LABEL. THE PAYLOAD SHOWN ON THE LABEL IS GREATER THAN THE MAXIMUM VALIDATED PAYLOAD. IF THE VEHICLE WERE LOADED TO THE INCORRECTLY LABELED PAYLOAD, IT MAY NOT RIDE AND HANDLE IN THE MANNER THAT THE DRIVER EXPECTS.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: THIS COULD RESULT IN A LOSS OF CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE OR AN INABILITY TO STOP THE VEHICLE WITHIN EXPECTED STOPPING DISTANCES.

Remedy: OWNERS WILL BE SENT A NEW LABEL FOR INSTALLATION ON THE DRIVER'S DOOR OF THE VEHICLE.

00V228003 · Seat Belts

Aug 7, 2000

VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES, LIGHT DUTY TRUCKS, SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, AND MINI VANS EQUIPPED WITH TRW SEAT BELT BUCKLE ASSEMBLIES. THE BUCKLE BASE OF THESE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES WERE NOT PROPERLY HEAT TREATED AND THEREFORE DO NOT PASS THE LOAD BEARING REQUIREMENT OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 209, "SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES."

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE OCCUPANT MAY NOT BE PROPERLY RESTRAINED.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE VEHICLE'S SAFETY BELT BUCKLE ASSEMBLY DATE CODES AND, IF NECESSARY, WILL REPLACE ANY SAFETY BELT BUCKLE ASSEMBLY.

00V055000 · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip

Feb 28, 2000

VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: LIGHT DUTY PICKUP TRUCKS EQUIPPED WITH 4-WHEEL DISC BRAKES. SOME OF THESE VEHICLES HAVE AN ANTILOCK BRAKE SYSTEM (ABS) MOTOR CONTAINING AN OUT-OF-SPECIFICATION SPRING CLIP. THIS CLIP COULD ALLOW THE MOTOR BEARING TO BECOME MISALIGNED. IF MISALIGNMENT OCCURS, EVENTUALLY THE ABS WOULD BE NON-FUNCTIONAL.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: THE BASE BRAKES WOULD REMAIN FULLY FUNCTIONAL, BUT THE DYNAMIC REAR PROPORTIONING (DRP) SYSTEM, WHICH OPTIMIZES FRONT TO REAR BRAKE BALANCE, WOULD BECOME INOPERATIVE.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE BRAKE PRESSURE MODULE VALVE ASSEMBLY.

99V220000 · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip

Aug 11, 1999

VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: S -TRUCKS EQUIPPED WITH 2 WHEEL DRIVE. THESE VEHICLES MAY HAVE HAD THE RIGHT-HAND ANTILOCK BRAKE SYSTEM (ABS) MODULE FEED PIPE AND/OR BRAKE CROSSOVER PIPE TUBE NUTS TIGHTENED WITHOUT SEATING THE PIPE-FLARED-ENDS ENOUGH TO WITHSTAND NORMAL ASSEMBLY AND VEHICLE INPUTS WITHOUT PARTIALLY UNSEATING. THIS DOES NOT COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF FMVSS NO. 105, "HYDRAULIC SERVICE BRAKE NORMAL, EMERGENCY, AND PARK BRAKING PERFORMANCE."

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: IF THIS OCCURRED, THE SEATING SEAL COULD BE BROKEN DURING VEHICLE ASSEMBLY, OR FROM EARLY ROAD INPUTS OR BRAKE FLUID CYCLING, AND A LEAK COULD OCCUR INCREASING THE BRAKE STOPPING DISTANCE.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE BRAKE PIPE UNION FOR SIGNS OF BRAKE FLUID, AND IF NECESSARY, INSTALL A NEW BRAKE PIPE UNION.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

3

EA05008 · Tailgate Support Cables

Opened Apr 14, 2005 · Closed May 19, 2006

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Latches/locks/linkages:tailgate:latch

GENERAL MOTORS IS CONDUCTING A SPECIAL POLICY PROGRAM FOR 903,464 OWNERS OF 2000 - 2003 MODEL S/T VEHICLES THROUGH WHICH OWNERS MAY, AT THEIR OPTION, EITHER (1) PERIODICALLY INSPECT THE TAILGATE SUPPORT CABLES INSTALLED IN THEIR VEHICLE AND HAVE THE CABLES REPLACED IF THE CABLE COATING EXHIBITS ANY INDICATIONS OF DAMAGE OR DETERIORATION OR (2) REQUEST THAT THE TAILGATE SUPPORT CABLES BE REPLACED FREE OF CHARGE. GM WILL HONOR ALL REQUESTS BY OWNERS WHO OPT FOR REPLACEMENT WITHOUT QUESTION REGARDLESS OF THE CONDITION OR APPEARANCE OF THE CABLES. GM HAS AGREED TO MAIL REMINDER NOTIFICATIONS TO OWNERS EVERY TWO YEARS UNTIL THE TAILGATE SUPPORT CABLES HAVE BEEN REPLACED OR UNTIL THE VEHICLE IS 12 YEARS OLD.ODI'S INVESTIGATION INDICATES THAT A SIGNIFICANT MAJORITY OF THE REPORTED COMPLAINTS (87%) AND INJURIES (94%) HAVE OCCURRED IN MY 2000 - 2003 S/T VEHICLES.

RQ04012 · Tailgate Support Cable(s) Break

Opened Nov 22, 2004 · Closed Apr 14, 2005

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Structure:body:hatchback/liftgate:support Device/strut

ODI IS UPGRADING RQ04-012 AND OPENING AN EA TO INVESTIGATE THE TAILGATE SUPPORT CABLES INSTALLED IN 1998 - 2004 MODEL YEAR SONOMA AND S10 MODEL VEHICLES.GENERAL MOTORS IS CONDUCTING RECALL CAMPAIGN 04V-129 TO REPLACE THE TAILGATE SUPPORT CABLES ORIGINALLY INSTALLED IN CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2000-2004 SIERRAS AND SILVERADOS AND CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2002-2004 AVALANCHES AND ESCALADE EXTS (C/K MODELS).GENERAL MOTORS HAS ADVISED ODITHAT THE TAILGATE SUPPORT CABLES INSTALLED IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES WERE FABRICATED USING IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR SHEATHING MATERIAL AS THE RECALLED VEHICLES.HOWEVER,GENERAL MOTORS HAS ADVISED ODI THAT SONOMA AND S-10 VEHICLES DIFFER FROM C/K MODELS IN SEVERAL WAYS: THE VEHICLE HEIGHT IS LOWER; THE TAILGATE DISPLACEMENT (DROP) WHEN NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CABLES IS SMALLER AND THE TAILGATE COMES TO REST AT A LESS SEVERE TIP ANGLE WHEN NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CABLES; THE TAILGATE MASS IS SMALLER; AND THE SIZE, PAYLOAD, AND USAGE CHARACTERISTCIS ARE LESS DEMANDING THAN C/K MODEL VEHICLES.GM ALSO STATED THAT SONOMA AND S-10 WARRANTY CLAIM INFORMATION INDICATES A LOWER CLAIM COUNT AND A LOWER CLAIM RATE THAN RECALLED C/K MODELS.NOTWITHSTANDING THE ABOVE INFORMATION, ODI HAS RECEIVED AN ADDITIONAL 73 NON-INJURY COMPLAINTS AND 10 INJURY COMPLAINTS ON THE SUBJECT VEHICLES DURING RQ04-012 (SINCE NOVEMBER 2004 TO DATE), WHICH JUSTIFIES OPENING AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE THIS ISSUE.

PE02066 · Engine Stall Due To Fuel Starvation

Opened Sep 6, 2002 · Closed Nov 3, 2003

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Fuel System, Gasoline; Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:fuel Pump; Fuel System, Other; Fuel System, Other:delivery:fuel Pump

ODI OPENED PE02-066 TO EVALUATE THE SCOPE AND CONSEQUENCE OF ENGINE POWER-LOSS DUE TO FUEL STARVATION INDUCED BY IN-TANK MODULAR FUEL PUMP STRAINER RESTRICTION.THE SUBJECT PUMPS USE AN EXTERNAL ?SOCK? STRAINER TO FILTER FUEL FLOWING TO THE PUMP INLET.THIS FILTER CAN SOMETIMES BECOME CLOGGED, RESULTING IN A REDUCED FLOW OF FUEL TO THE ENGINE.GM HAS SUBSEQUENTLY MODIFIED THE STRAINERS TO REDUCE THIS RESTRICTION.ANALYSIS OF THE ODI COMPLAINT DATABASE SHOWS THAT DESPITE THESE RESTRICTIONS, THE SUBJECT VEHICLES STALL AT A RATE THAT IS COMPARABLE TO THOSE OF MANY PEER VEHICLES.ADDITIONALLY, NONE OF THE RELEVANT WARRANTY REPAIR RATES EXCEED 1% AT 36 MONTHS OF EXPOSURE.ONE RELATED CRASH INVOLVES A STALLED VEHICLE THAT WAS REAR-ENDED ON THE ROADWAY, WHILE THE REMAINDER INVOLVED MINOR COLLISIONS OR SCRAPES.THE SOLE INJURY CONSISTED OF BRUISING FROM A LOW SPEED FRONTAL CRASH. GIVEN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, FURTHER EXPENDITURE OF AGENCY RESOURCES IS NOT JUSTIFIED IN THIS MATTER.THE PRELIMINARY EVALUATION IS THEREFORE CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY WILL TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN THE FUTURE IF WARRANTED.

Additional source detail variants (4)

Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:fuel Pump

ODI OPENED PE02-066 TO EVALUATE THE SCOPE AND CONSEQUENCE OF ENGINE POWER-LOSS DUE TO FUEL STARVATION INDUCED BY IN-TANK MODULAR FUEL PUMP STRAINER RESTRICTION.THE SUBJECT PUMPS USE AN EXTERNAL ?SOCK? STRAINER TO FILTER FUEL FLOWING TO THE PUMP INLET.THIS FILTER CAN SOMETIMES BECOME CLOGGED, RESULTING IN A REDUCED FLOW OF FUEL TO THE ENGINE.GM HAS SUBSEQUENTLY MODIFIED THE STRAINERS TO REDUCE THIS RESTRICTION.ANALYSIS OF THE ODI COMPLAINT DATABASE SHOWS THAT DESPITE THESE RESTRICTIONS, THE SUBJECT VEHICLES STALL AT A RATE THAT IS COMPARABLE TO THOSE OF MANY PEER VEHICLES.ADDITIONALLY, NONE OF THE RELEVANT WARRANTY REPAIR RATES EXCEED 1% AT 36 MONTHS OF EXPOSURE.ONE RELATED CRASH INVOLVES A STALLED VEHICLE THAT WAS REAR-ENDED ON THE ROADWAY, WHILE THE REMAINDER INVOLVED MINOR COLLISIONS OR SCRAPES.THE SOLE INJURY CONSISTED OF BRUISING FROM A LOW SPEED FRONTAL CRASH. GIVEN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, FURTHER EXPENDITURE OF AGENCY RESOURCES IS NOT JUSTIFIED IN THIS MATTER.THE PRELIMINARY EVALUATION IS THEREFORE CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY WILL TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN THE FUTURE IF WARRANTED.

Fuel System, Gasoline

ODI OPENED PE02-066 TO EVALUATE THE SCOPE AND CONSEQUENCE OF ENGINE POWER-LOSS DUE TO FUEL STARVATION INDUCED BY IN-TANK MODULAR FUEL PUMP STRAINER RESTRICTION.THE SUBJECT PUMPS USE AN EXTERNAL ?SOCK? STRAINER TO FILTER FUEL FLOWING TO THE PUMP INLET.THIS FILTER CAN SOMETIMES BECOME CLOGGED, RESULTING IN A REDUCED FLOW OF FUEL TO THE ENGINE.GM HAS SUBSEQUENTLY MODIFIED THE STRAINERS TO REDUCE THIS RESTRICTION.ANALYSIS OF THE ODI COMPLAINT DATABASE SHOWS THAT DESPITE THESE RESTRICTIONS, THE SUBJECT VEHICLES STALL AT A RATE THAT IS COMPARABLE TO THOSE OF MANY PEER VEHICLES.ADDITIONALLY, NONE OF THE RELEVANT WARRANTY REPAIR RATES EXCEED 1% AT 36 MONTHS OF EXPOSURE.ONE RELATED CRASH INVOLVES A STALLED VEHICLE THAT WAS REAR-ENDED ON THE ROADWAY, WHILE THE REMAINDER INVOLVED MINOR COLLISIONS OR SCRAPES.THE SOLE INJURY CONSISTED OF BRUISING FROM A LOW SPEED FRONTAL CRASH. GIVEN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, FURTHER EXPENDITURE OF AGENCY RESOURCES IS NOT JUSTIFIED IN THIS MATTER.THE PRELIMINARY EVALUATION IS THEREFORE CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY WILL TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN THE FUTURE IF WARRANTED.

Fuel System, Other:delivery:fuel Pump

ODI OPENED PE02-066 TO EVALUATE THE SCOPE AND CONSEQUENCE OF ENGINE POWER-LOSS DUE TO FUEL STARVATION INDUCED BY IN-TANK MODULAR FUEL PUMP STRAINER RESTRICTION.THE SUBJECT PUMPS USE AN EXTERNAL ?SOCK? STRAINER TO FILTER FUEL FLOWING TO THE PUMP INLET.THIS FILTER CAN SOMETIMES BECOME CLOGGED, RESULTING IN A REDUCED FLOW OF FUEL TO THE ENGINE.GM HAS SUBSEQUENTLY MODIFIED THE STRAINERS TO REDUCE THIS RESTRICTION.ANALYSIS OF THE ODI COMPLAINT DATABASE SHOWS THAT DESPITE THESE RESTRICTIONS, THE SUBJECT VEHICLES STALL AT A RATE THAT IS COMPARABLE TO THOSE OF MANY PEER VEHICLES.ADDITIONALLY, NONE OF THE RELEVANT WARRANTY REPAIR RATES EXCEED 1% AT 36 MONTHS OF EXPOSURE.ONE RELATED CRASH INVOLVES A STALLED VEHICLE THAT WAS REAR-ENDED ON THE ROADWAY, WHILE THE REMAINDER INVOLVED MINOR COLLISIONS OR SCRAPES.THE SOLE INJURY CONSISTED OF BRUISING FROM A LOW SPEED FRONTAL CRASH. GIVEN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, FURTHER EXPENDITURE OF AGENCY RESOURCES IS NOT JUSTIFIED IN THIS MATTER.THE PRELIMINARY EVALUATION IS THEREFORE CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY WILL TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN THE FUTURE IF WARRANTED.

Fuel System, Other

ODI OPENED PE02-066 TO EVALUATE THE SCOPE AND CONSEQUENCE OF ENGINE POWER-LOSS DUE TO FUEL STARVATION INDUCED BY IN-TANK MODULAR FUEL PUMP STRAINER RESTRICTION.THE SUBJECT PUMPS USE AN EXTERNAL ?SOCK? STRAINER TO FILTER FUEL FLOWING TO THE PUMP INLET.THIS FILTER CAN SOMETIMES BECOME CLOGGED, RESULTING IN A REDUCED FLOW OF FUEL TO THE ENGINE.GM HAS SUBSEQUENTLY MODIFIED THE STRAINERS TO REDUCE THIS RESTRICTION.ANALYSIS OF THE ODI COMPLAINT DATABASE SHOWS THAT DESPITE THESE RESTRICTIONS, THE SUBJECT VEHICLES STALL AT A RATE THAT IS COMPARABLE TO THOSE OF MANY PEER VEHICLES.ADDITIONALLY, NONE OF THE RELEVANT WARRANTY REPAIR RATES EXCEED 1% AT 36 MONTHS OF EXPOSURE.ONE RELATED CRASH INVOLVES A STALLED VEHICLE THAT WAS REAR-ENDED ON THE ROADWAY, WHILE THE REMAINDER INVOLVED MINOR COLLISIONS OR SCRAPES.THE SOLE INJURY CONSISTED OF BRUISING FROM A LOW SPEED FRONTAL CRASH. GIVEN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, FURTHER EXPENDITURE OF AGENCY RESOURCES IS NOT JUSTIFIED IN THIS MATTER.THE PRELIMINARY EVALUATION IS THEREFORE CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY WILL TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN THE FUTURE IF WARRANTED.