2011 Buick Lacrosse

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK LACROSSE. THE CONTACT WAS INVOLVED IN A CRASH WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 40 MPH. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE DRIVERS SIDE AIR BAG PREMATURELY DEPLOYED WITHOUT WARNING. THE CONTACT SUSTAINED A CONCUSSION. THE DEALER WAS NOTIFIED AND ADVISED THE CONTACT FILE A COMPLAINT WITH NHTSA. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 6,000 AND THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 5,700. THE VIN WAS UNAVAILABLE. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED.

I WAS DRIVING OUR BUICK LACROSSE WITH 3036 MILES ON IT, AT 58 MPH, WHEN THE WHEEL BEGAN TO JERK BACK & FORTH VIOLENTLY. I WAS SKIDDING DOWN THE ROAD UNABLE TO STEER. I WAS ABLE TO GET TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD AND EVENTUALLY HAVE THE CAR TOWED IN. THE RIGHT REAR TIE ROD BOLT HAD BROKEN. WHEN THIS HAPPENED THE SUSPENSION CONTROL ARM WAS BENT. BOTH PARTS HAVE BEEN REPLACED.. WE WERE TOLD THEY HAD NOT SEEN THIS HAPPEN BEFORE AND NO EXPLANATION AS TO WHAT WOULD HAVE MADE IT HAPPEN. *TR

2011 BUICK LACROSSE. CONSUMER STATES PROBLEMS WITH KEYLESS PUSH BUTTON START FEATURE SYSTEM *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED THE MANUAL DESCRIBED THE METHOD TO MOVE THE TRANSMISSION LEVER FROM PARK TO NEUTRAL WITHOUT STARTING THE ENGINE, FOR THE PURPOSE OF TOWING THE VEHICLE OR MOVING IT WITHOUT STARTING THE ENGINE IF THE BATTERY WAS DEAD OR THE ENGINE WILL NOT START FOR ANY OTHER REASON. THE MANUAL STATED TO SET THE PARKING BRAKE WHICH CAN NOT BE DONE IF THE BATTERY IS DEAD BECAUSE THE PARKING BRAKE IS ELECTRICALLY OPERATED. THE CONSUMER STATED EVERYTHING STATED IN THE MANUAL, CAN NOT BE PERFORMED IN REALITY. THE CONSUMER STATED IT SEEMED AS THOUGH INSUFFICIENT TESTING WAS DONE ON THE FEATURE. *JB

WE BOUGHT A NEW 2011 BUICK LACROSSE CXS 11-15-10, DROVE IT 200 MILES AND THE FRONT SUSPENSION FAILED IN COSTCO PARKING LOT AT 10 MPH AND NO IMPACT. THE RIM POPPED OPEN AT THE CENTER SEAM CREATING A BIG OVAL OPENING THAT LOCKED UP ON THE BRAKE CALIPER, STOPPING THE WHEEL WHICH SNAPPED THE TIE ROD END, LETTING THE TIRE WEDGE INTO THE INNER FENDER THEN THE A-ARM BENT AND CAUSED SOME DAMAGE TO THE ENGINE CRADLE. MY WIFE CRACKED HER HEAD ON THE SIDE WINDOW IT WENT DOWN SO FAST. THE GENERAL MOTORS ENGINEER CAME TO INVESTIGATE THE INCIDENT, FOUND NO IMPACT DAMAGE, BUT REFUSED TO DISCUSS THE STRUCTURAL FAILURE OF THE LEFT FRONT SUSPENSION. THE TIRE SHOWS NO IMPACT BRUISES AND THE RIM HAS NO DAMAGE EXCEPT FOR A SMALL CHUNK ON THE INSIDE OF THE RIM WHERE THE STEERING RAM POPPED THE RIM WHEN IT LOCKED INTO THE INTER FENDER. MY POINT: IF THIS HAPPENED AT HIGHWAY SPEED IT WOULD HAVE CAUSED A MAJOR ACCIDENT. THE RIM STARTED THIS CHAIN REACTION, BUT AT SUCH A MINOR SPEED THE SUSPENSION SHOULD NOT HAVE FAILED. I WAS TOLD THAT THIS IS A NEW SUSPENSION FOR THE 2011 CXS SPORT MODEL. PLEASE LOOK INTO THIS. I DO NOT WANT TO RISK MY FAMILIES SAFETY WHEN I FEEL UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THIS NEW SUSPENSION AND HAVE ASK FOR A REFUND. GM HAS DENIED MY REQUEST, AND NOW IT GOES TO MY ATTORNEY. PLEASE LOOK INTO THIS FOR CONSUMER SAFETY. *TR

UPON LEAVING DEALERSHIP AFTER PURCHASE OF NEW CAR, TURNED RIGHT TO EXIT AND TRANSMISSION JUMPED INTO NEUTRAL, ALMOST REAR-ENDED. THOUGHT I MAY HAVE HIT SHIFTER. ANOTHER TURN FROM STOP AND TRANS JUMPED INTO NEUTRAL DURING TURN WHILE ENTERING TRAFFIC. JUST MISSED BEING HIT AND PERHAPS KILLED. MANUALLY RETURNED TO "D". LIFE THREATENING DEFECT. RET TO DEALER AND DEMONSTRATED. NEXT DAY DEALER ADVISED THAT A "MODULE" ON THE TRANSMISSION WAS INSTALLED BACKWARDS BY GM MFG. ADVISED GM DAY AFTER OCCURRENCE. LATER GM CALLED AND TOLD ME CAR HAD BEEN REPAIRED AND GET IT OR "THEY" WOULD CHARGE ME STORAGE. OBVIOUSLY, AFTER EXPOSING WIFE AND MYSELF TO GREAT RISK, WE DID NOT WANT THAT VEHICLE. NOW GM WILL NOT SPEAK TO ME AS I TRY TO ENSURE THAT THE AUTOS PRODUCED PRIOR AND POST TO MINE WERE VERIFIED TO ENSURE THEY DID NOT HAVE THE SAME LIFE THREATENING DEFECT AND REACT ACCORDINGLY. GM SEEMS NOT TO CARE. PLS NOTE: THE CAR "DROPPED" FROM DRIVE IN NEUTRAL EVERYTIME I ACCELERATED FROM A TURN INTO TRAFFIC. THIS PROBLEM WAS DEMONSTRATED TO THE DEALER; DEALER SAID PARK IT NOW. QUESTION IS HOW MANY BUICKS WERE MANUFACTURED WITH THIS VERY DANGEROUS DEFECT. THE 2 TIMES THIS HAPPENED, PRIOR TO KNOWLEDGE OF THE/A PROBLEM, IF I HAD NOT BEEN ABLE TO RETURN TO "DRIVE" AND PROCEED WITH MAXIMUM ACCELERATION, WE WOULD HAVE BEEN UNQUESTIONABLY HIT BY APPROACHING CARS. HAD MY WIFE BEEN DRIVING, HER REACTION WOULD HAVE BEEN SLOWER AND SHE COULD HAVE EASILY BEEN KILLED. THIS IS LIFE THREATENING. I DELAYED CONTACTING THE NTSB IN THAT I BELIEVED GM WOULD TAKE ACTION. I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT TO BE THE SITUATION. HELP - LIVES ARE DEFINITELY AT RISK IF ANY CARS PRIOR TO OR AFTER MINE HAVE THIS DEFECT. SUSPECT POORLY TRAINED INDIVIDUAL ON THE LINE THAT DAY "FILLING" IN. POOR ENGINEERING AS DEALER STATED THE PART WAS SO DESIGNED AS IT COULD BE INSTALLED BACKWARDS. PLEASE CONFIRM YOU ARE TAKING ACTION AS THIS IS A CRITICAL DEFECT THAT COULD VERY EASILY RESULT IN DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY AS I CANNOT CONFIRM GM ACTION. *TR