NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
What owners actually said
164 reports22,000 miles · Sep 25, 2019
Exterior Lighting
2015 FORD EDGE WITH 22,000 MILES. THE REAR CENTER BRAKE LIGHT ASSEMBLY HAS MALFUNCTIONED AND THE LIGHTS ARE NOT WORKING. THE LIGHTS CANNOT BE REPLACED - THE WHOLE UNIT HAS TO BE REPLACED, WHICH COSTS ALMOST $300. THE DEALER TOLD ME THERE IS WATER IN THE UNIT. THIS CAR IS GARAGED AT WORK AND AT HOME. I HAVE READ THAT OTHER PEOPLE…
Read full complaint
2015 FORD EDGE WITH 22,000 MILES. THE REAR CENTER BRAKE LIGHT ASSEMBLY HAS MALFUNCTIONED AND THE LIGHTS ARE NOT WORKING. THE LIGHTS CANNOT BE REPLACED - THE WHOLE UNIT HAS TO BE REPLACED, WHICH COSTS ALMOST $300. THE DEALER TOLD ME THERE IS WATER IN THE UNIT. THIS CAR IS GARAGED AT WORK AND AT HOME. I HAVE READ THAT OTHER PEOPLE HAVE HAD THE SAME ISSUE. I HAVE AN EXTENDED WARRANTY BUT LIGHTS AREN'T INCLUDED. SINCE THIS IS A WHOLE UNIT - NOT JUST A BULB - IT SHOULD BE INCLUDED.
NHTSA ODI #11258201
35,000 miles · Sep 4, 2019
Electrical SystemService Brakes
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2015 TOYOTA PRIUS. WHILE THE CONTACT'S DAUGHTER WAS DRIVING AT AN UNKNOWN SPEED, THE BRAKE WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT INFORMED HIS DAUGHTER TO CHECK UNDER THE HOOD FOR POSSIBLE LOW BRAKE FLUID. WHEN EVERYTHING CHECKED OUT, THE CONTACT'S DAUGHTER RESTARTED THE VEHICLE AND THE WARNING INDICAT…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2015 TOYOTA PRIUS. WHILE THE CONTACT'S DAUGHTER WAS DRIVING AT AN UNKNOWN SPEED, THE BRAKE WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT INFORMED HIS DAUGHTER TO CHECK UNDER THE HOOD FOR POSSIBLE LOW BRAKE FLUID. WHEN EVERYTHING CHECKED OUT, THE CONTACT'S DAUGHTER RESTARTED THE VEHICLE AND THE WARNING INDICATOR TURNED OFF. THE CONTACT RECEIVED A CUSTOMER SUPPORT PROGRAM NOTIFICATION (ZJB) REGARDING A DEFECT WITH THE BRAKE BOOSTER OR BRAKE BOOSTER PUMP, WHICH COULD CAUSE THE BRAKE LAMP WARNING INDICATOR TO ILLUMINATE. THE CONTACT NOTIFIED FRONTIER TOYOTA (23621 CREEKSIDE RD, VALENCIA, CA 91355, 661-255-7575) OF THE NOTIFICATION AND WAS INFORMED THAT A DIAGNOSTIC TEST WOULD NEED TO BE PERFORMED BEFORE THEY COULD MAKE ANY REPAIRS. THE MANUFACTURER WAS ALSO NOTIFIED OF THE NOTIFICATION AND PROVIDED THE SAME INFORMATION AS THE DEALER. THE MANUFACTURER PROVIDED CASE NUMBER: 1909041948. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 35,000.
NHTSA ODI #11253199
70,000 miles · Aug 16, 2019
Air BagsSeat BeltsCrashInjury
TL* THE CONTACT OWNED A 2015 TOYOTA PRIUS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE HER HUSBAND WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 55 MPH, ANOTHER VEHICLE REAR-ENDED THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE. AS RESULT THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE ROLLED OVER MULTIPLE TIMES CRASHING INTO A DITCH. THE CONTACT STATED THAT ONLY THE FRONT PASSENGER AIR BAG DEPLOYED. THERE WAS N…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNED A 2015 TOYOTA PRIUS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE HER HUSBAND WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 55 MPH, ANOTHER VEHICLE REAR-ENDED THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE. AS RESULT THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE ROLLED OVER MULTIPLE TIMES CRASHING INTO A DITCH. THE CONTACT STATED THAT ONLY THE FRONT PASSENGER AIR BAG DEPLOYED. THERE WAS NO WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE FRONT SEAT PASSENGER SUSTAINED FRACTURES TO THE RIGHT ARM, WRIST, PELVIS, RIBS AND STERNUM AS WELL A FEW BUMPS AND BRUISES ON LOWER LEG AND CHIN. THE DRIVER SUSTAINED A CONCUSSION, MULTIPLE FACIAL FRACTURES AND LACERATIONS AND A BROKEN NOSE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE SHE BELIEVES THAT THE .DRIVER SIDE SEAT BELT AND HEAD REST FRACTURED AS HER HUSBAND WAS FOUND LAYING UNCONSCIOUS IN THE REAR PASSENGER SEAT FACE DOWN. THE CONTACT AND THE DRIVER WERE TRANSPORTED TO THE HOSPITAL BY AMBULANCE. THE CONTACT WAS UNAWARE OF INJURIES IN THE OTHER VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO TOW LOT AND DEEMED A TOTAL LOSS. THE DEALER AND THE MANUFACTURER WERE NOT CONTACTED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 70,000. THE VIN WAS NOT PROVIDED.
NHTSA ODI #11244474
Mileage unknown · Aug 5, 2019
Tires
DRIVING ON THE FREEWAY HOME HEARD A STRANGE NOISE, PULLED OVER TO CHECK AND THOUGHT I HAD BLOWN A TIRE SOMEHOW. WHEN CLOSELY INSPECTING TIRE TREADING THE CENTER OF THE TIRE COMPLETELY CAME OFF IN A PERFECT CIRCLE WHEN DRIVING. TOOK TIRE TO COSTCO WHERE TIRES WERE PURCHASED LESS THAN A YEAR A AGO (8/24/18) WAS INFORMED ITS A MANU…
Read full complaint
DRIVING ON THE FREEWAY HOME HEARD A STRANGE NOISE, PULLED OVER TO CHECK AND THOUGHT I HAD BLOWN A TIRE SOMEHOW. WHEN CLOSELY INSPECTING TIRE TREADING THE CENTER OF THE TIRE COMPLETELY CAME OFF IN A PERFECT CIRCLE WHEN DRIVING. TOOK TIRE TO COSTCO WHERE TIRES WERE PURCHASED LESS THAN A YEAR A AGO (8/24/18) WAS INFORMED ITS A MANUFACTURER'S DEFECT. HAD TO PAY FOR A NEW TIRE. IT WAS ALSO DISCOVERED THAT PASSENGER BACK TIRE HAD A WHOLE IN IT WHICH WAS MISSED WHEN I TOOK CAR IN FOR TIRE INSPECTION.
NHTSA ODI #11241659
47,500 miles · Jul 30, 2019
Wheels
TAKATA RECALL I HAVE HAD MY CAR FOR OVER 1 YR. I NOTICED THAT THE DRIVER'S SIDE FRONT TIRE GOES FLAT FASTER THAN THE REST. ONE DAY WHEN I WAS MAKING A U-TURN THERE WAS A NOISE AND I COULD FEEL THE CAR SHAKE. I CANNOT TO THIS DAY MAKE A QUICK LEFT U-TURN. THIS LOUD NOISE HAS CAUSED ME TO PARK AND CHECK ON THE CAR ITSELF. MY SIST…
Read full complaint
TAKATA RECALL I HAVE HAD MY CAR FOR OVER 1 YR. I NOTICED THAT THE DRIVER'S SIDE FRONT TIRE GOES FLAT FASTER THAN THE REST. ONE DAY WHEN I WAS MAKING A U-TURN THERE WAS A NOISE AND I COULD FEEL THE CAR SHAKE. I CANNOT TO THIS DAY MAKE A QUICK LEFT U-TURN. THIS LOUD NOISE HAS CAUSED ME TO PARK AND CHECK ON THE CAR ITSELF. MY SISTER WAS IN THE CAR WHEN IT HAPPENED ONE DAY. SHE CAN ATTEST TO THE NOISE. I TOOK THE CAR TO THE DEALERSHIP HERE AT HILLTOP AND THEY DROVE THE CAR AND DIAGNOSED IT AS FINE. IT IS NOT FINE.
NHTSA ODI #11240756
Mileage unknown · Jul 13, 2019
Service Brakes
VIOLENT SHAKING WHEN APPLYING BRAKES IN FORWARD AND REVERSE. VEHICLE DOES NOT SLOW AND STOP PROPERLY WHEN BRAKING. VEHICLE INTERMITTENTLY SKIPS WITH NO SLOWING OR STOPPING EFFECT WHEN BRAKING.
NHTSA ODI #11231660
63,000 miles · Jun 11, 2019
Service Brakes
SENT AN ALERT ON CERTAIN INTERNAL MALFUNCTION OF INTERNAL ASSEMBLIES OF THE BRAKE BOOSTER FROM TOYOTA. ASKING ME TO BRING IT IN FOR EXAMINATION. BRAKES HAVE BEEN ACTING SPONGY AND AM LOSING A SMALL AMOUNT OF BRAKE FLUID MONTHLY.
NHTSA ODI #11219354
50,000 miles · Jun 10, 2019
Power TrainService BrakesVehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury
I ENTERED MY PARKED, STATIONARY PRIUS, PRESSED MY RIGHT FOOT ON THE BRAKE PEDAL, DISENGAGED THE PARKING BRAKE AND PRESSED THE ON/OFF BUTTON TO TURN THE CAR ON. MY FOOT REMAINED ON THE BRAKE PEDAL. THE ENGINE IMMEDIATELY RACED AND THE CAR BEGAN TO ACCELERATE AT HIGH SPEED. I STOMPED ON THE BRAKE PEDAL AND THE CAR KEPT MOVING. THE…
Read full complaint
I ENTERED MY PARKED, STATIONARY PRIUS, PRESSED MY RIGHT FOOT ON THE BRAKE PEDAL, DISENGAGED THE PARKING BRAKE AND PRESSED THE ON/OFF BUTTON TO TURN THE CAR ON. MY FOOT REMAINED ON THE BRAKE PEDAL. THE ENGINE IMMEDIATELY RACED AND THE CAR BEGAN TO ACCELERATE AT HIGH SPEED. I STOMPED ON THE BRAKE PEDAL AND THE CAR KEPT MOVING. THE SOUND OF THE ENGINE WAS LOUD ENOUGH THAT PEOPLE IN NEARBY HOUSES HEARD IT. MY CAR WOULD NOT SLOW WITH MY EFFORTS TO BRAKE. I TRIED TO SHIFT INTO NEUTRAL AND PARK BUT THE CAR DID NOT SLOW DOWN. IT RACED ACROSS THE STREET AND PLOWED DIRECTLY INTO A NEIGHBOR'S STONE WALL. MY CAR BECAME WEDGED BETWEEN THE WALL AND A LARGE TREE. I HAD TO EXIT THE VEHICLE FROM THE PASSENGER SIDE AS THE DRIVER'S DOOR WAS PRESSED AGAINST THE TREE. AFTER THE COLLISION, INTERIOR LIGHTS WERE NON-FUNCTIONING EVEN WHEN THE DOOR WAS PROPPED OPEN. THE CAR WOULD HAVE CRASHED THROUGH THE HOUSE IF IT HAD NOT BEEN STOPPED BY THE WALL AND TREE.
NHTSA ODI #11219137
60,000 miles · Apr 30, 2019
Service Brakes
TOYOTA SENT ME A LETTER STATING THE BRAKE BOOSTER MAY CAUSE ISSUES WITH MY CAR AND ALL MY LIGHTS CAME ON FOR THIS ISSUE. TOYOTA TOLD ME TO TAKE CAR TO DEALER FOR REPAIR UNDER NEW WARRANTY EXTENSION FOR BRAKE BOOSTER ISSUES. DEALER IS NOW TELLING ME IT'S NOT COVERED SO I NEED TO PAY FOR REPAIRS. I ASKED WHAT I'M PAYING FOR AND…
Read full complaint
TOYOTA SENT ME A LETTER STATING THE BRAKE BOOSTER MAY CAUSE ISSUES WITH MY CAR AND ALL MY LIGHTS CAME ON FOR THIS ISSUE. TOYOTA TOLD ME TO TAKE CAR TO DEALER FOR REPAIR UNDER NEW WARRANTY EXTENSION FOR BRAKE BOOSTER ISSUES. DEALER IS NOW TELLING ME IT'S NOT COVERED SO I NEED TO PAY FOR REPAIRS. I ASKED WHAT I'M PAYING FOR AND THEY STATED NEW BRAKE BOOSTER. WHAT'S GOING ON HERE??
NHTSA ODI #11204770
89,000 miles · Apr 5, 2019
Electrical SystemPower Train
VEHICLE JERKED VIOLENTLY AND HAD LOSS OF POWER ON HIGHWAY AT SPEED OF 65MPH GOING STRAIGHT. TOYOTA EVALUATED AND DETERMINED THE INVERTER WAS BURNT DUE TO OVERHEATING CAUSING HYBRID SYSTEM TO FAIL. TOYOTA STATED WAS NOT COVERED BY VIN FOR EXISTING RECALL.
NHTSA ODI #11194080
NHTSA investigations
3DP23005 · Brake Actuator Valve Wear
Opened Nov 22, 2023 · No close date supplied
Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:foundation Components; Service Brakes, Hydraulic:power Assist
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) has received a petition dated September 19, 2023 from the owner of a 2012 Toyota Prius V requesting that ODI reevaluate its decision to deny DP19-004. In the letter, the petitioner reported experiencing an unexpected and complete loss of brake power while driving, accompanied by multiple dashboard warning lights. This petition is based on the petitioner's direct experience and assessment that ODI closed DP19-004 because its prompting petition was withdrawn by that petitioner. ODI will review the work conducted during DP19-004 and a review of any additional related complaints and crashes via a new defect petition The petition and related materials can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under the following ODI number:11553736.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Service Brakes, Hydraulic:foundation Components
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) has received a petition dated September 19, 2023 from the owner of a 2012 Toyota Prius V requesting that ODI reevaluate its decision to deny DP19-004. In the letter, the petitioner reported experiencing an unexpected and complete loss of brake power while driving, accompanied by multiple dashboard warning lights. This petition is based on the petitioner's direct experience and assessment that ODI closed DP19-004 because its prompting petition was withdrawn by that petitioner. ODI will review the work conducted during DP19-004 and a review of any additional related complaints and crashes via a new defect petition The petition and related materials can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under the following ODI number:11553736.
Service Brakes, Hydraulic:power Assist
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) has received a petition dated September 19, 2023 from the owner of a 2012 Toyota Prius V requesting that ODI reevaluate its decision to deny DP19-004. In the letter, the petitioner reported experiencing an unexpected and complete loss of brake power while driving, accompanied by multiple dashboard warning lights. This petition is based on the petitioner's direct experience and assessment that ODI closed DP19-004 because its prompting petition was withdrawn by that petitioner. ODI will review the work conducted during DP19-004 and a review of any additional related complaints and crashes via a new defect petition The petition and related materials can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under the following ODI number:11553736.
DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds
Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System
NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.
DP19004 · Brake Actuator Valve Wear
Opened Sep 30, 2019 · Closed Jan 21, 2021
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:power Assist
On September 19, 2019, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a defect petition from Mr. Roger Hogan requesting that the Agency investigate and recall certain Toyota Prius, Prius PHV, Camry Hybrid and Avalon Hybrid vehicles for a brake actuator valve wear condition covered under Toyota Customer Support Programs ZJB and ZKK (subject CSP?s). In support of his request, the petitioner identified 117 NHTSA complaints allegedly related to the subject CSP condition, including 60 reporting crashes. On September 30, 2019, ODI opened Defect Petition DP19-004 to evaluate the petitioner?s request for an investigation. In August 2020, the petitioner notified the Agency that he was withdrawing his petition. Because the petitioner has withdrawn the petition, we are denying the petition as moot and no further analysis of this petition is necessary.NHTSA is authorized to issue an order requiring notification and remedy of a defect if the Agency?s investigation shows a defect in the design, construction, or performance of a motor vehicle that presents an unreasonable risk to safety. 49 U.S.C. ?? 30102(a)(9), 30118. Because the petitioner has with withdrawn the petition, the petition is denied as moot. This action does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The Agency notes that it is not required to receive a defect petition prior to opening a defect investigation and will take further action if warranted by future circumstances.