← New search

2009 Toyota Matrix

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Matrix years

Owner complaints for the 2009 Toyota Matrix are substantially higher than the model-year median of 70.5.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Matrix years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

114 reports with mileage · 78 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Air Bags. Review the 78 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Vehicle Speed Control. Review the 45 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Steering. Review the 22 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

34 crash reports1 fire reports18 injury reports

Vehicle Speed Control complaints

45 reports
Clear category filter
300 miles · May 10, 2010
Vehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THREE WEEKS AFTER THE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED SHE MADE A LEFT TURN, THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED AND CRASHED INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE. THE CONTACT WAS INJURED. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED AN AUTHORIZED DEALER WHO REPAIRED THE VEHICLE PER NHTSA CAMPAIGN …

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THREE WEEKS AFTER THE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED SHE MADE A LEFT TURN, THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED AND CRASHED INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE. THE CONTACT WAS INJURED. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED AN AUTHORIZED DEALER WHO REPAIRED THE VEHICLE PER NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 10V023000 (VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL: ACCELERATOR PEDAL); HOWEVER, THE VEHICLE CONTINUED TO ACCELERATE. THE CONTACT ADVISED THE MANUFACTURER THAT SHE WANTED TO REPLACE THE VEHICLE; HOWEVER, THEY WOULD NOT OFFER ANY ASSISTANCE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 300 MILES AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 4,000.

NHTSA ODI #10329773

37,000 miles · Apr 18, 2010
EquipmentVehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

I WAS ATTEMPTING A LEFT TURN AND HAD BEGUN TO ACCELERATE BUT THEN DECIDED TO NOT TURN, I TOOK MY FOOT OFF THE GAS PEDAL AND IT CONTINUED TO ACCELERATE, I'M NOT SURE IF I WAS ABLE TO APPLY THE BRAKE AND GET ANY RESULTS OR NOT BECAUSE I WAS HIT BY ONCOMING TRAFFIC SUDDENLY. I WAS VERY CONFUSED BY THE INCIDENT, BECAUSE IT WAS NOT …

Read full complaint

I WAS ATTEMPTING A LEFT TURN AND HAD BEGUN TO ACCELERATE BUT THEN DECIDED TO NOT TURN, I TOOK MY FOOT OFF THE GAS PEDAL AND IT CONTINUED TO ACCELERATE, I'M NOT SURE IF I WAS ABLE TO APPLY THE BRAKE AND GET ANY RESULTS OR NOT BECAUSE I WAS HIT BY ONCOMING TRAFFIC SUDDENLY. I WAS VERY CONFUSED BY THE INCIDENT, BECAUSE IT WAS NOT MY INTENT TO DRIVE FORWARD AND YET IT DID SO. I WAS ASSUMING THAT SINCE I HAD THE CAR SERVICED FOR THE RECALL ISSUES LAST MONTH, THE CAR WAS SAFE. WE HAVE ALSO HAD ISSUES WITH THE GAS PEDAL BEING NON RESPONSIVE WHEN IN CRUISE CONTROL MODE. IT HAD HAPPENED ONCE WHEN I HAD USED IT AND ONCE WHEN MY HUSBAND HAD USED IT, BUT WE HAD NO INCIDENTS FROM IT AND DISCONTINUED USING CRUISE CONTROL. THE CAR WAS TOWED TO THE CHEROKEE COUNTY (GA) TOYOTA COLLISION CENTER WHERE I TOLD THEM OF THE NON INTENDED ACCELERATION. THEY ASSURED ME THEY WOULD LOOK INTO IT, BUT ONLY AFTER REPAIRING THE BODY. AFTER THEY HAD DONE SO, THEY CALLED ME AND TOLD ME TO GENERATE A CASE AND GAVE ME THE NUMBER TO TOYOTA. I DID SO ON FRIDAY, APRIL 16TH. I HAVE NOT YET HEARD FROM THE CASE MANAGER, BUT AM CONCERNED AND FRIGHTENED OF THE VEHICLE AT THIS POINT. I HAVE A HEAD INJURY; A CONCUSSION AND A WRIST INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE ACCIDENT. THE RECALL SERVICE WORK WAS DONE AT CHEROKEE COUNTY TOYOTA IN GEORGIA WHERE I PURCHASED THE CAR. MY INSURANCE COMPANY WAS ALSO INFORMED OF THE ISSUE AND HAVE ASSURED ME THAT THEY WILL LOOK INTO THE ISSUE AND SEEK REPAYMENT FROM TOYOTA IF THEY ARE LIABLE FOR THE ACCIDENT. THE SERVICE MANAGER AND COLLISION CENTER GUY WHO IS HANDLING MY VEHICLE HAVE TOLD ME THAT IT IS MORE LIKELY THAT I WOULD BE "HIT BY LIGHTENING AND MAULED BY A BEAR ON THE SAME DAY" THAN IT IS THAT MY ACCIDENT WAS CAUSED BY A PROBLEMATIC OR UNINTENTIONAL ACCELERATION THAT IS A RESULT OF AN ISSUE WITH THE CAR. THEY ALSO TOLD ME THAT A COMPUTERIZED "TEST" WAS DONE AND THAT MY CAR IS OK, BUT THEN TOLD ME TO INITIATE A CASE WITH TOYOTA. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10326251

25,000 miles · Apr 8, 2010
Vehicle Speed ControlCrash

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 5 MPH, THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED AND CRASHED INTO A PARKED VEHICLE. THERE WERE NO INJURIES NOR WAS A POLICE REPORT FILED. THE FAILURE RECURRED WHILE THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 50 MPH; THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY SURGED AS THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESS…

Read full complaint

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 5 MPH, THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED AND CRASHED INTO A PARKED VEHICLE. THERE WERE NO INJURIES NOR WAS A POLICE REPORT FILED. THE FAILURE RECURRED WHILE THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 50 MPH; THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY SURGED AS THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER WHERE THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL WAS REPAIRED, THE FLOOR MAT WAS REMOVED AND THE VEHICLE WAS RECALIBRATED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 25,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 35,000.

NHTSA ODI #10324434

289 miles · Apr 6, 2010
Air BagsVehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED RAPIDLY AFTER SHE DEPRESSED THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL TO MAKE A LEFT TURN. THE VEHICLE CRASHED INTO ANOTHER VEHICE. THE AIR BAGS DID NOT DEPLOY. BOTH THE CONTACT AND DRIVER OF THE OTHER VEHICLE SUSTAINED NECK INJURIES; A POLICE REPORT …

Read full complaint

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED RAPIDLY AFTER SHE DEPRESSED THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL TO MAKE A LEFT TURN. THE VEHICLE CRASHED INTO ANOTHER VEHICE. THE AIR BAGS DID NOT DEPLOY. BOTH THE CONTACT AND DRIVER OF THE OTHER VEHICLE SUSTAINED NECK INJURIES; A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALERSHIP WHERE IT WAS REPAIRED AT THE CONTACTS EXPENSE. THE MANUFACTURER CALLED THE CONTACT AND REQUESTED TO TAKE THE VEHICLE APART TO REPAIR THE PROBLEM. THE CONTACT WANTED REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE REPAIRS AND WANTED TO GIVE THE VEHICLE BACK ,AS SHE WAS STILL EXPERIENCING SUDDEN ACCELERATION INTERMITTENTLY. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 289. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 2,900.

NHTSA ODI #10323936

49,675 miles · Mar 25, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control

IT IS REPORTED REGARDING THE TOYOTA SUDDEN ACCELERATION RECALL THAT FOR OWNERS WHO HAVE HAD THE FIRST ATTEMPT TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM (INSTALL METAL REINFORCEMENT BARS IN THE ACCELERATOR) AND THE ATTEMPT DID NOT WORK TOYOTA WOULD REPLACE THE ENTIRE ACCELERATOR ASSEMBLY AT THE VEHICLE OWNER'S REQUEST. I HAVE HAD PROBLEMS WITH TH…

Read full complaint

IT IS REPORTED REGARDING THE TOYOTA SUDDEN ACCELERATION RECALL THAT FOR OWNERS WHO HAVE HAD THE FIRST ATTEMPT TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM (INSTALL METAL REINFORCEMENT BARS IN THE ACCELERATOR) AND THE ATTEMPT DID NOT WORK TOYOTA WOULD REPLACE THE ENTIRE ACCELERATOR ASSEMBLY AT THE VEHICLE OWNER'S REQUEST. I HAVE HAD PROBLEMS WITH THE UNINTENDED ACCELERATION, HAD THE FIRST REPAIR ATTEMPT COMPLETED AND I STILL HAVE THE PROBLEM. I CALLED MY LOCAL TOYOTA DEALER WHERE I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE AND WAS TOLD THAT TOYOTA WILL NOW REFUSE TO PERFORM THIS SECOND ATTEMPT UNTIL NEXT MONTH WHEN ANOTHER DIFFERENT TYPE OF "FIX" WILL BE SCHEDULED (SHAVING THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL). MY VEHICLE DOES NOT HAVE FLOOR MATS AND I FIND THIS EXCUSE UNACCEPTABLE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10322174

6,200 miles · Mar 18, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED WITHOUT WARNING AT A TRAFFIC LIGHT. IN ORDER TO STOP THE VEHICLE FROM ACCELERATING, THE CONTACT HAD TO APPLY THE BRAKES AND SHIFT THE VEHICLE INTO NEUTRAL GEAR. PRIOR TO THE RECENT FAILURE, THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE NHTSA RECALL # 10V0230…

Read full complaint

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED WITHOUT WARNING AT A TRAFFIC LIGHT. IN ORDER TO STOP THE VEHICLE FROM ACCELERATING, THE CONTACT HAD TO APPLY THE BRAKES AND SHIFT THE VEHICLE INTO NEUTRAL GEAR. PRIOR TO THE RECENT FAILURE, THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE NHTSA RECALL # 10V023000, VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL, ACCELERATOR PEDAL WAS PERFORMED ON THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE IS CURRENTLY BEING DIAGNOSED BY THE DEALER. THERE ARE TWO OTHER PEOPLE THAT DRIVE THE VEHICLE AND THEY HAVE ALSO EXPERIENCED UNINTENDED ACCELERATION. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 6,200 AND THE APPROXIMATE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 6,200.

NHTSA ODI #10320774

Mileage unknown · Mar 16, 2010
Air BagsVehicle Speed ControlCrash

LTR FWD FM (NE) RE UNINTENDED SUDDEN ACCELERATION FROM OWNER OF A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX INVOLVED IN AN AUTO ACCIDENT ON 1/13/2010, REPLY TO OMAHA, NE OFC. *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED HE REAR ENDED ANOTHER VEHICLE WHILE ATTEMPTING TO BRAKE, BUT INSTEAD THE VEHICLE CONTINUED TO ACCELERATE. THE CONSUMER STATED THE POLICE DID NOT WRITE …

Read full complaint

LTR FWD FM (NE) RE UNINTENDED SUDDEN ACCELERATION FROM OWNER OF A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX INVOLVED IN AN AUTO ACCIDENT ON 1/13/2010, REPLY TO OMAHA, NE OFC. *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED HE REAR ENDED ANOTHER VEHICLE WHILE ATTEMPTING TO BRAKE, BUT INSTEAD THE VEHICLE CONTINUED TO ACCELERATE. THE CONSUMER STATED THE POLICE DID NOT WRITE UP POLICE REPORT. THE CONSUMER ALSO STATED THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. UPON INSPECTION, IT WAS DETERMINED THE AIR BAG SENSORS WERE FRIED, PROBABLY WELL BEFORE THE ACCIDENT.

NHTSA ODI #10319748

Mileage unknown · Mar 9, 2010
Vehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX. WHILE DRIVING 30 MPH THE GAS PEDAL STUCK AND THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED. THE CONTACT APPLIED THE BRAKES AND THE EMERGENCY BRAKE AND THE VEHICLE DID NOT SLOW DOWN. THE VEHICLE CRASHED INTO THE CURB CAUSING DAMAGE TO THE UNDER CARRIAGE. THE AIR BAGS DEPLOYED AND THE CONTACT INJURED HER ARM…

Read full complaint

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX. WHILE DRIVING 30 MPH THE GAS PEDAL STUCK AND THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED. THE CONTACT APPLIED THE BRAKES AND THE EMERGENCY BRAKE AND THE VEHICLE DID NOT SLOW DOWN. THE VEHICLE CRASHED INTO THE CURB CAUSING DAMAGE TO THE UNDER CARRIAGE. THE AIR BAGS DEPLOYED AND THE CONTACT INJURED HER ARM. THE CONTACT HAS NOT CALLED THE MANUFACTURER AT THIS TIME. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS UNKNOWN.

NHTSA ODI #10318279

4,000 miles · Mar 8, 2010
Vehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

I RECENTLY BOUGHT A 2010 TOYOTA CAMRY AND WAS NEVER CONTACTED BY THE DEALERSHIP OR TOYOTA ABOUT THE TWO RECALLS ON MY CAR. WHEN I CALLED THE DEALERSHIP TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT TO FIX MY CAR, I WAS TOLD BY THE SERVICE PERSON THAT WHY DID I NEED TO FIX IT FOR, HE ACTED LIKE HE DIDN'T EVEN KNOW ABOUT THE RECALLS. THEY MADE ME WAIT…

Read full complaint

I RECENTLY BOUGHT A 2010 TOYOTA CAMRY AND WAS NEVER CONTACTED BY THE DEALERSHIP OR TOYOTA ABOUT THE TWO RECALLS ON MY CAR. WHEN I CALLED THE DEALERSHIP TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT TO FIX MY CAR, I WAS TOLD BY THE SERVICE PERSON THAT WHY DID I NEED TO FIX IT FOR, HE ACTED LIKE HE DIDN'T EVEN KNOW ABOUT THE RECALLS. THEY MADE ME WAIT TWO WEEKS FOR THE APPOINTMENT AND THEN HAD TO KEEP MY CAR FOR A WHOLE DAY. BEFORE THE 2010 CAMRY I HAD BOUGHT A 2009 MATRIX THROUGH ANOTHER DEALERSHIP AND I FINALLY THIS PAST WEEK RECEIVED A SAFETY RECALL ON THAT VEHICLE, WELL UNFORTUNATELY I DON'T HAVE THE CAR ANYMORE SINCE I HAD A CAR ACCIDENT IN MARCH OF 2009, WHERE I ALMOST LOST MY LIFE. HAD I KNOWN THE VEHICLE HAD ISSUES I WOULD HAVE IMMEDIATELY RETURNED THE CAR. I WENT THROUGH MONTHS OF PHYSICAL AGONY AND MEDICAL APPOINTMENTS AND TODAY I AM STILL NOT BETTER A YEAR LATER. I FEEL THAT I WAS BETRAYED BY TOYOTA NOT ONCE BUT TWICE. I WOULD NEVER BUY ANOTHER VEHICLE FROM TOYOTA. I FEEL THAT THE WAY THEY HANDLED THIS WHOLE RECALL SITUATION IS UNETHICAL. I COULD HAVE LOST MY LIFE AND NEVER KNOWN ABOUT THE CAR PROBLEMS. THEN I WATCH THE NEWS AND SEE THAT THERE HAS BEEN MANY DEATHS BECAUSE OF THIS AND I COULD HAVE BEEN ANOTHER STATISTIC. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10317819

28,213 miles · Mar 5, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THEY NEVER HAD AN ACCELERATION PROBLEM UNTIL AFTER HAVING THE VEHICLE REPAIRED. WHILE PULLING OUT OF A PARKING SPACE, AND DRIVING 10 MPH, THE VEHICLE JERKED FORWARD AND THEN SETTLED DOWN. THE RPM JUMPED UP AND THEN WENT BACK DOWN. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 28213 A…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 TOYOTA MATRIX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THEY NEVER HAD AN ACCELERATION PROBLEM UNTIL AFTER HAVING THE VEHICLE REPAIRED. WHILE PULLING OUT OF A PARKING SPACE, AND DRIVING 10 MPH, THE VEHICLE JERKED FORWARD AND THEN SETTLED DOWN. THE RPM JUMPED UP AND THEN WENT BACK DOWN. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 28213 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 28500.

NHTSA ODI #10317088

Official recalls

3

16V340000 · Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

May 23, 2016

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2008-2011 Scion xB and Lexus IS F, 2009-2011 Toyota Corolla and Corolla Matrix, 2006-2011 Toyota Yaris, Lexus IS250 and Lexus IS350, 2010-2011 Toyota 4Runner, Lexus IS250C, Lexus IS350C and Lexus GX460, 2011 Sienna, 2007-2011 Lexus ES350, and 2009-2010 Pontiac Vibe vehicles, originally sold, or ever registered, in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands (Saipan), and the U.S. Virgin Islands, or "Zone A." Additionally, unless included in "Zone A" above, Toyota is recalling certain model year 2008 Scion xB and Lexus IS F, 2007-2008 Toyota Yaris, 2006-2008 Lexus IS250 and Lexus IS350 and 2007-2008 Lexus ES350 vehicles, originally sold, or ever registered, in Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, or "Zone B." Vehicles of these model years and models that were not originally sold or ever registered in either Zones A or B are not subject to this safety recall. These vehicles are equipped with certain air bag inflators assembled as part of the passenger frontal air bag modules, and used as original equipment or replacement equipment. In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the front air bags, these inflators may rupture due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to absolute humidity and temperature cycling.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An inflator rupture may result in metal fragments striking the vehicle occupants resulting in serious injury or death.

Remedy: Toyota will notify the Toyota and Lexus owners. General Motors will contact the Pontiac owners. Depending on the model, dealers will replace the passenger frontal air bag inflator or the air bag assembly, free of charge. The recall began on December 6, 2016. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331. Toyota's numbers for interim notification for this campaign are G1P (Toyota Zone A), G1R (Toyota Zone B), G2G (Lexus Zone A), and G2H (Lexus Zone B). Toyota's numbers for final remedy for this campaign are G0P (Toyota Zone A), G0R (Toyota Zone B), GLG (Lexus Zone A), and GLH (Lexus Zone B).

10V035000 · Equipment:other:labels

Feb 3, 2010

GULF STATES TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2005-2010 VEHICLES FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 110, "TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS." THESE VEHICLES WERE SOLD BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 1, 2005 AND JUNE 2, 2008 WITHOUT THE REQUISITE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY MODIFICATION LABELS.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: THIS DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARD REQUIREMENTS.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL MAIL TO CONSUMERS THE CORRECTED LABEL OR THE CUSTOMER WILL HAVE THE OPTION FOR DEALERS TO INSTALL THE LABEL FREE OF CHARGE. DEALERS WILL ALSO CORRECT THE OWNER'S MANUAL. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 27, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT GULF STATES TOYOTA AT 713-580-3300.

10V023000 · Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

Jan 27, 2010

TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2008-2010 HIGHLANDER, MODEL YEAR 2009-2010 COROLLA, VENZA AND MATRIX PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL CAN GET STUCK IN THE WIDE OPEN POSITION DUE TO ITS BEING TRAPPED BY AN UNSECURED OR INCOMPATIBLE DRIVER'S FLOOR MAT. THIS RECALL IS AN EXPANSION OF A CAMPAIGN OF 3.8 MILLION OTHER TOYOTA VEHICLES ANNOUNCED IN 2009 FOR THE SAME ISSUE (SEE 09V-388).

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A STUCK OPEN ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY RESULT IN VERY HIGH VEHICLE SPEEDS AND MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO STOP THE VEHICLE, WHICH COULD CAUSE A CRASH, SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH.

Remedy: TOYOTA WILL MODIFY OR REPLACE THE ACCELERATOR PEDALS ON THE SUBJECT VEHICLES. FLOOR SURFACE MODIFICATIONS ARE ALSO BEING CONSIDERED AND WILL BE INCLUDED FOR ANY MODEL FOR WHICH IT IS DEEMED APPROPRIATE. INITIALLY, DEALERS WILL BE INSTRUCTED ON HOW TO RESHAPE THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL FOR THE REPAIR. AS REPLACEMENT PARTS WITH THE SAME SHAPE AS THE MODIFIED PEDAL BECOME AVAILABLE, THEY WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE DEALERS FOR THE REPAIR. CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE HAD THE PEDAL RESHAPE REMEDY COMPLETED WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO RECEIVE A NEW PEDAL IF THEY DESIRE, AFTER REPLACEMENT PEDALS BECOME AVAILABLE. IN ADDITION, TOYOTA WILL REPLACE ANY TOYOTA ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MAT IN A SUBJECT VEHICLE WITH A NEWLY DESIGNED MAT, FREE OF CHARGE. FOR THOSE CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE THE PREVIOUS DESIGN ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MAT BUT DO NOT NEED OR WANT THE NEWLY DESIGNED ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MAT, TOYOTA WILL RECOVER THE PREVIOUS DESIGN ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MAT AND REIMBURSE ITS PRICE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN MARCH 30, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TOYOTA AT 1-800-331-4331.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

EA21002 · Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture

Opened Sep 17, 2021 · No close date supplied

Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module; Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.