← New search

2015 Subaru Outback

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Outback years

Owner complaints for the 2015 Subaru Outback are substantially higher than the model-year median of 207.5.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

343 reports with mileage · 167 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Visibility/wiper. Review the 130 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 127 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Engine. Review the 47 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

20 crash reports5 fire reports13 injury reports

Visibility/wiper complaints

130 reports
Clear category filter
820 miles · May 18, 2015
Visibility/wiper

SUBARU OUTBACK IS TWO MONTHS OLD AND DEVELOPED A CRACK IN THE WINDSHIELD, WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED. CRACK STARTED AT THE BOTTOM/CENTER OF THE WINDSHIELD AND WAS ROUGHLY EIGHT INCHES STRAIGHT UP. SUBARU ACCEPTS ZERO RESPONSIBILITY, SO I HAVE TO PAY FOR A NEW WINDSHIELD. I HAVE BEEN WAITING TWO WEEKS WITH NO WINDSHIELDS AVA…

Read full complaint

SUBARU OUTBACK IS TWO MONTHS OLD AND DEVELOPED A CRACK IN THE WINDSHIELD, WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED. CRACK STARTED AT THE BOTTOM/CENTER OF THE WINDSHIELD AND WAS ROUGHLY EIGHT INCHES STRAIGHT UP. SUBARU ACCEPTS ZERO RESPONSIBILITY, SO I HAVE TO PAY FOR A NEW WINDSHIELD. I HAVE BEEN WAITING TWO WEEKS WITH NO WINDSHIELDS AVAILABLE. CRACK HAS GROWN TO ROUGHLY THIRTY INCHES AND A ZIG ZAG PATTERN NOW.

NHTSA ODI #10717178

943 miles · May 17, 2015
Visibility/wiper

MY WINDSHIELD WIPERS STOPPED WORKING. I WAS DRIVING IN ATLANTA, GEORGIA ON 5/17/15 AT 4-7PM AND MY WINDSHIELD WIPERS DON'T WORK. I PULLED INTO A PARKING SPACE TO RESTART MY VEHICLE AND THE WIPERS STILL NOT WORK. I ENDED UP WAITING INSIDE MY OUTBACK FOR OVER TWO HOURS WAITING ON THE RAIN TO STOP. THIS IS RIDICULOUS! I BROUGHT T…

Read full complaint

MY WINDSHIELD WIPERS STOPPED WORKING. I WAS DRIVING IN ATLANTA, GEORGIA ON 5/17/15 AT 4-7PM AND MY WINDSHIELD WIPERS DON'T WORK. I PULLED INTO A PARKING SPACE TO RESTART MY VEHICLE AND THE WIPERS STILL NOT WORK. I ENDED UP WAITING INSIDE MY OUTBACK FOR OVER TWO HOURS WAITING ON THE RAIN TO STOP. THIS IS RIDICULOUS! I BROUGHT THIS CAR BRAND NEW WITH 11 MILES ON IT AND AFTER DRIVING 900 MILES THE WINDSHIELD WIPERS ARE NOT WORKING.

NHTSA ODI #10716960

6,000 miles · May 11, 2015
Visibility/wiper

I PURCHASED MY 2015 SUBARU OUTBACK IN NOVEMBER 2014 AND THE FIRST WINDSHIELD CRACK OCCURRED BEGINNING OF MARCH 2015. THE CRACK HAPPENED OVERNIGHT AND IT WAS THE DAY AFTER A MAJOR SNOW STORM. THE CRACK INITIATED FROM THE PASSENGER SIDE AND UP TO THE CENTER OF WINDSHIELD. THERE WAS NO SIGN OF CHIPS/CRACKS DUE TO FOREIGN OBJECTS WH…

Read full complaint

I PURCHASED MY 2015 SUBARU OUTBACK IN NOVEMBER 2014 AND THE FIRST WINDSHIELD CRACK OCCURRED BEGINNING OF MARCH 2015. THE CRACK HAPPENED OVERNIGHT AND IT WAS THE DAY AFTER A MAJOR SNOW STORM. THE CRACK INITIATED FROM THE PASSENGER SIDE AND UP TO THE CENTER OF WINDSHIELD. THERE WAS NO SIGN OF CHIPS/CRACKS DUE TO FOREIGN OBJECTS WHICH SEEM LIKE A DEFECTIVE PART/DESIGN TO ME. THE CRACK PROPAGATED REALLY QUICKLY. I CONTACTED DEALERSHIP AND THEY SAID ITS NOT COVERED UNDER WARRANTY AND REFUSED TO LOOK AT THE CRACK. THE DEALERSHIP ALSO TOLD ME STRAIGHT UP TO GO THROUGH INSURANCE AND DEAL WITH IT MYSELF. I WENT THROUGH INSURANCE AND REPLACED THE WINDSHIELD WITH A GENUINE SUBARU PART BY THE END OF MARCH. JUST WHEN I THOUGH IT IS OVER, A CRACK JUST APPEARED ON MY WINDSHIELD ON MAY 10, 2015. THE CRACK SEEM TO HAVE INITIATED FROM THE WINDSHIELD HEATING COMPARTMENT AGAIN. DURING THE MORNING OF MAY 11, 2015, I LOOKED AT THE CRACK AGAIN AND IT DIDN'T GROW OVERNIGHT. HOWEVER, WHEN I CHECKED ON IT WHILE IT WAS PARKED AT WORK DURING NOON TIME, THE CRACK GREW ABOUT 2 INCHES. THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE FOR A BRAND NEW CAR TO HAVE TO GO THROUGH 2 CRACKED WINDSHIELDS. A GOOD WINDSHIELD SHOULD BE ABLE TO WITHSTAND TEMPERATURE CHANGE AND MINOR IMPACTS FROM FOREIGN OBJECTS AND THE 2015 SUBARU OUTBACK IS DEFINITELY NOT MEETING THAT REQUIREMENT. IN ADDITION, THE DEALERSHIP IS NOT BEING HELPFUL WITH THE SITUATION AND NOT TAKING ANY RESPONSIBILITIES IN INVESTIGATING WHETHER THIS CAN BE A VEHICLE DEFECT OR NOT. I AM NOT GOING TO REPLACE MY WINDSHIELD OUT OF MY OWN EXPENSE AND I DEMAND FOR AN ANSWER/EXPLANATION FROM SUBARU.

NHTSA ODI #10715794

2,192 miles · May 11, 2015
Visibility/wiper

WINDSHIELD HIT BY PEBBLE ON FREEWAY, SMALL CHIP NOTED ON PARKING VEHICLE FOR THE NIGHT IN GARAGE. NEXT MORNING APPROXIMATE 9"VERTICAL CRACK ON WINDSHIELD WHILE DRIVING TO WORK, BY THE TIME I HAD DRIVEN VEHICLE 12 MILES CRACK GREW TO APPROXIMATELY 27 INCHES HORIZONTALLY ACROSS WINDSHIELD. AFTER TWO WEEKS OF DRIVING THERE ARE NOW …

Read full complaint

WINDSHIELD HIT BY PEBBLE ON FREEWAY, SMALL CHIP NOTED ON PARKING VEHICLE FOR THE NIGHT IN GARAGE. NEXT MORNING APPROXIMATE 9"VERTICAL CRACK ON WINDSHIELD WHILE DRIVING TO WORK, BY THE TIME I HAD DRIVEN VEHICLE 12 MILES CRACK GREW TO APPROXIMATELY 27 INCHES HORIZONTALLY ACROSS WINDSHIELD. AFTER TWO WEEKS OF DRIVING THERE ARE NOW COMPETING DUAL CRACKS EACH MEASURING IN EXCESS OF 30 INCHES HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE WINDSHIELD. WITH OVER 45 YEARS OF SAFE DRIVING UNDER MY BELT I HAVE NEVER SEEN A WINDSHIELD PERFORM IN THIS MANNER. THIS MUST BE A SAFETY ISSUE, I HAVE A DIFFICULT TIME BELIEVING THIS IS NOT A ISSUE WITH EITHER THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE VEHICLE AND OR THE WINDSHIELD. WHAT IS THE NHTSA DOING TO INVESTIGATE THIS ISSUE AND INSURE OR SAFETY? I HAVE THE OLD WINDSHIELD IF THIS WILL HELP TO DETERMINE THE ISSUE.

NHTSA ODI #10715748

900 miles · May 8, 2015
Visibility/wiper

FIRST TIME WASHING MY NEW 2015 SUBARU OUTBACK WITH BARELY 900 MILES ON IT. PARKED IT IN FRONT OF THE HOUSE. WALKED FROM THE GARAGE TO THE VEHICLE TO CHECK FOR WATER SPOTS AND NOTED A 5" CRACK IN THE WINDSHIELD WHERE THERE WASN'T ONE WHILE I WASHED IT! STARTS WHERE THE HEATING ELEMENT IS UNDER THE PASSENGER SIDE WIPER. IT'S RAPID…

Read full complaint

FIRST TIME WASHING MY NEW 2015 SUBARU OUTBACK WITH BARELY 900 MILES ON IT. PARKED IT IN FRONT OF THE HOUSE. WALKED FROM THE GARAGE TO THE VEHICLE TO CHECK FOR WATER SPOTS AND NOTED A 5" CRACK IN THE WINDSHIELD WHERE THERE WASN'T ONE WHILE I WASHED IT! STARTS WHERE THE HEATING ELEMENT IS UNDER THE PASSENGER SIDE WIPER. IT'S RAPIDLY SPREAD UP AND ACROSS MY DRIVING LINE OF SIGHT. WHEN THE SUN IS UP, THE GLINTING BECOMES ALMOST BLINDING. I TOOK IT TO THE DEALER WHERE I PURCHASED IT TO REPORT WHAT TO ME WAS AN OBVIOUS DEFECT. THEIR HEAD OF SERVICE LOOKED AT IT AND PRONOUNCED IT WAS CAUSED BY A ROCK. HE TRIED TO EXPLAIN WHERE HE SAW THIS "IMPACT". I DISAGREED. THERE IS NO IMPACT CRAZE. THEY TOLD ME TO CONTACT MY INSURANCE COMPANY. THE INSURANCE EXAMINER TOOK PICTURES AND PRONOUNCED IT DUE TO "A STRUCTURAL DEFECT". SUBSEQUENTLY, THE GLASS WAS ORDERED AND I'M SUPPOSED TO PAY FOR IT PLUS THE INSTALLATION OR THERE'LL BE A RE-STOCKING FEE. I'VE WAITED OVER A MONTH WHILE BEING TOLD THERE ARE SHORTAGES, OR IT'S TOO NEW, AND "DUE TO THE LONGSHOREMAN'S STRIKE IN LONG BEACH..." I RANG UP SUBARU OF AMERICA, WHO OPENED A CASE AND ARE HAVING ME GO BACK TO THE DEALER, HAVE THEM TAKE PICTURES, SEND THOSE AND THE REPORT FROM THE INSURANCE COMPANY TO THEM. SEEMS LIKE I'M DOING A LOT OF WORK FOR WHAT TO ME SHOULD BE COVERED AS A DEFECTIVE WINDSHIELD OR A STRUCTURAL PROBLEM WITH THIS MODEL. THERE ARE 7 COMPLAINTS, FILED ON THIS WEB-SITE FROM SUBARU OWNERS, THIS MODEL, SAME YEAR, WITH THE IDENTICAL PASSENGER SIDE CRACK. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER RECORDS OF THESE INCIDENTS RECORDED AT SAFERCAR.GOV, AND SUBARUOUTBACK.ORG I'M FRUSTRATED AND DISAPPOINTED BEYOND WORDS AS THIS IS A NEW CAR. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10715404

750 miles · May 6, 2015
Visibility/wiper

I JUST BOUGHT A BRAND NEW 2015 SUBARU OUTBACK ON MARCH 18, 2015. I SEE ALREADY THAT THERE ARE NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS ALREADY ON THE SAFETY OF THE 2015 SUBARU OUTBACK WINDSHIELDS. I WAS DRIVING DOWN THE FREEWAY ON MAY 2, 2015 AND A VERY SMALL PEBBLE FLEW INTO THE WINDSHIELD AND I COULDN'T BELIEVE THAT SMALL A PEBBLE WOULD CRACK T…

Read full complaint

I JUST BOUGHT A BRAND NEW 2015 SUBARU OUTBACK ON MARCH 18, 2015. I SEE ALREADY THAT THERE ARE NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS ALREADY ON THE SAFETY OF THE 2015 SUBARU OUTBACK WINDSHIELDS. I WAS DRIVING DOWN THE FREEWAY ON MAY 2, 2015 AND A VERY SMALL PEBBLE FLEW INTO THE WINDSHIELD AND I COULDN'T BELIEVE THAT SMALL A PEBBLE WOULD CRACK THE WINDSHIELD OVER 6 INCHES! I AM VERY UPSET. I PARKED THE CAR IN A RESTAURANT PARKING LOT THAT DAY AND WHEN I CAME OUT, THE CRACK HAD GROWN TO 12 INCHES BY ITSELF! MY RELATIVES WERE IN TOWN AND I COULDN'T DRIVE MY NEW VEHICLE ON A SHORT TRIP I WANTED TO TAKE THEM ON. OF COURSE THIS IS A SPECIAL ORDER ITEM SO I AM WAITING AND WAITING FOR IT TO BE REPLACED. CALLED SUBARU SERVICE DEPARTMENT AND THEY CLAIM NO KNOWLEDGE OF PROBLEMS WITH THE WINDSHIELDS (OF COURSE). I HAVE NO VEHICLE TO DRIVE BECAUSE I FEEL IT IS UNSAFE TO DRIVE AND HAVE BEEN INCONVENIENCED TO HAVE TO DRIVE MY OTHER OLDER VEHICLE. I DIDN'T WANT TO HAVE INSURANCE ALSO PAY FOR A RENTAL/REPLACEMENT VEHICLE AS WELL WHEN THIS IS A SUBARU PROBLEM AND A NATIONAL SAFETY PROBLEM WITH THIS VEHICLE THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED IMMEDIATELY. IT IS NOW MAY 6TH AND I STILL HAVE NO NEW WINDSHIELD AND DON'T EXPECT ONE ANYTIME SOON. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE IS A GOOD POSSIBILITY THAT THE WINDSHIELD WILL CRACK AGAIN FROM ALL THE COMPLAINTS I AM READING ON THIS WEBSITE. WHEN WILL SOMEONE RECALL THIS WINDSHIELD? AFTER SOMEONE GETS KILLED? PLEASE RECALL THIS WINDSHIELD! *TR

NHTSA ODI #10715062

13,000 miles · Apr 27, 2015
Visibility/wiper

OUR FULLY-LOADED '15 OUTBACK WITH EYESIGHT & LANE ASSIST WAS PARKED OVERNIGHT IN THE GARAGE (AS ALWAYS). WHEN WE GOT INTO THE VEHICLE, WE NOTICED AN 12-INCH CRACK IN THE WINDSHIELD (BEGINNING IN THE LOWER CORNER ON THE PASSENGER SIDE AND HEADING UP TOWARD THE CENTER OF THE VEHICLE). THERE WAS NO ACCIDENT OR ROCK INCIDENT TO WA…

Read full complaint

OUR FULLY-LOADED '15 OUTBACK WITH EYESIGHT & LANE ASSIST WAS PARKED OVERNIGHT IN THE GARAGE (AS ALWAYS). WHEN WE GOT INTO THE VEHICLE, WE NOTICED AN 12-INCH CRACK IN THE WINDSHIELD (BEGINNING IN THE LOWER CORNER ON THE PASSENGER SIDE AND HEADING UP TOWARD THE CENTER OF THE VEHICLE). THERE WAS NO ACCIDENT OR ROCK INCIDENT TO WARRANT THE CRACK - IT CAME OUT OF NOWHERE. WE CALLED OUR SUBARU SERVICE DEPARTMENT AND THEY REFERRED US TO THEIR (OUTSIDE VENDOR) WINDSHIELD REPAIR GUY. AFTER SEVERAL CALLS TO SUBARU, HE WAS TOLD THAT SUBARU HAS PULLED THESE WINDSHIELDS FROM THEIR PRODUCTION LINE BECAUSE THERE IS AN INHERENT PROBLEM WITH CRACKING DUE TO THEIR SUBSTANDARD QUALITY AND INFERIOR AERONAUTICAL DESIGN. HE SAID THAT THE SUBARU PLANT WAS WAITING ON A SET OF WINDSHIELDS AND AN ORDER WAS PLACED FOR ME, BUT THAT I WOULD BE COMPETING WITH THE NEW CARS ROLLING OFF THE PRODUCTION LINE. THIS INFORMATION ALONE (ASSUMING IT IS ACCURATE) SHOULD WARRANT A RECALL. WE CONTACTED THE WINDSHIELD GUY AGAIN TODAY TO FOLLOW UP AND HE SAID HE JUST ORDERED ANOTHER '15 OUTBACK WINDSHIELD FOR SOMEONE THIS MORNING - - SAME PROBLEM (NO ACCIDENT OR INCIDENT). HE REITERATED HIS CONVERSATION WITH SUBARU PRODUCTION PERSONNEL ONCE AGAIN THAT "THERE IS A DESIGN PROBLEM WITH THE WINDSHIELDS AND SUBARU HAS PULLED THEM FROM THEIR PRODUCTION LINES." TWO WEEKS AGO WE PUT A POST-IT FLAG INSIDE THE WINDSHIELD AT THE END OF THE CRACK TO MARK ITS PLACE AND PROGRESS - THE CRACK HAS NOW GROWN TO 20+ INCHES STRAIGHT ACROSS THE CENTER OF THE WINDSHIELD. IT IS EASY TO FIND OTHER FOLKS WITH THIS PROBLEM - - INEXPLICABLE CRACKED WINDSHIELDS WITH NO OBVIOUS SIGNS OF CAUSE. THE CAUSE AND EFFECT OF THESE BROKEN WINDSHIELDS SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SOMEONE IS SERIOUSLY HURT OR INJURED THROUGH NO FAULT OF THEIR OWN. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10713161

1,300 miles · Apr 21, 2015
Visibility/wiper

UPON ENTRY OF VEHICLE FOR THE FIRST TIME OF THE DAY, I DISCOVERED A 5-6 IN. CRACK IN WINDSHIELD. I HAD NOT OBSERVED ANY IMPACTS WHILE DRIVING THE DAY PRIOR. THE VEHICLE WAS ONLY 2 MONTHS OLD AT THE TIME. ALL OTHER AUTO GLASS ISSUES PREVIOUSLY WERE OBSERVED AND OBVIOUS. HAVING REVIEWED SIMILAR STORIES AND PICTURES ONLINE OF IS…

Read full complaint

UPON ENTRY OF VEHICLE FOR THE FIRST TIME OF THE DAY, I DISCOVERED A 5-6 IN. CRACK IN WINDSHIELD. I HAD NOT OBSERVED ANY IMPACTS WHILE DRIVING THE DAY PRIOR. THE VEHICLE WAS ONLY 2 MONTHS OLD AT THE TIME. ALL OTHER AUTO GLASS ISSUES PREVIOUSLY WERE OBSERVED AND OBVIOUS. HAVING REVIEWED SIMILAR STORIES AND PICTURES ONLINE OF ISSUES WITH THE WINDSHIELD OF THIS MODEL AND YEAR THE VEHICLE, I AM CONCERNED THAT THE ISSUE IS MORE THAN COINCIDENCE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10712088

Mileage unknown · Apr 21, 2015
Visibility/wiper

SUBARU OUTBACK 2015 WINDSHIELDS HAVE VERY LOW QUALITY AND CRACK WITH MINIMAL CONTACT. OUR WINDSHIELDS BROKE TWICE IN ONE MONTH AFTER REPLACING THE ORIGINAL ONE WITH ANOTHER FROM SUBARU. THE TWO TIMES DRIVEN ON THE HIGHWAY AND TWO TINY ROCK HIT THE WINDSHIELD AND CREATED A 12" LONG CRACK ACROSS THE WINDSHIELD. THE COST FOR THE W…

Read full complaint

SUBARU OUTBACK 2015 WINDSHIELDS HAVE VERY LOW QUALITY AND CRACK WITH MINIMAL CONTACT. OUR WINDSHIELDS BROKE TWICE IN ONE MONTH AFTER REPLACING THE ORIGINAL ONE WITH ANOTHER FROM SUBARU. THE TWO TIMES DRIVEN ON THE HIGHWAY AND TWO TINY ROCK HIT THE WINDSHIELD AND CREATED A 12" LONG CRACK ACROSS THE WINDSHIELD. THE COST FOR THE WINDSHIELDS IS VERY EXPENSIVE AT AROUND $700 TO PURCHASE A NEW WINDSHIELD AND TO HAVE IT INSTALLED. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10712080

2,500 miles · Apr 13, 2015
Visibility/wiper

WINDSHIELD ON EYESIGHT EQUIPPED 2015 OUTBACK DEVELOPED A LARGE CRACK STARTING IN THE WIPER HEATING AREA JUST UNDER THE PASSENGER SIDE WIPER. THE CRACK APPEARED SPONTANEOUS AS IT APPEARED WHILE THE CAR WAS PARKED AND WAS AT LEAST EIGHT INCHES LONG. BY THE NEXT MORNING WITH THE CAR REMAINING PARKED AND ONLY A FEW DEGREE TEMPERATU…

Read full complaint

WINDSHIELD ON EYESIGHT EQUIPPED 2015 OUTBACK DEVELOPED A LARGE CRACK STARTING IN THE WIPER HEATING AREA JUST UNDER THE PASSENGER SIDE WIPER. THE CRACK APPEARED SPONTANEOUS AS IT APPEARED WHILE THE CAR WAS PARKED AND WAS AT LEAST EIGHT INCHES LONG. BY THE NEXT MORNING WITH THE CAR REMAINING PARKED AND ONLY A FEW DEGREE TEMPERATURE CHANGE OVERNIGHT IT WAS AT LEAST 14 INCHES LONG. THE ONLY MARK ON THE GLASS I CAN FIND ALONG THE CRACK IS A MINUSCULE DOT THAT IS ABSOLUTELY NO LARGER THAN A GRAIN OF SAND IN THE WIPER HEATING AREA. IT IS A BARELY VISIBLE AND IS NOT EVEN AS DEEP AS A GRAIN OF SAND. IT WOULD BE INVISIBLE EXCEPT IN THE BRIGHTEST LIGHT AND IT SEEMS IMPOSSIBLE THAT IT COULD OR SHOULD BE RELATED TO THE CRACK. I HAVE DONE A QUICK SEARCH ONLINE AND AM FINDING AN INORDINATE NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS OF SPONTANEOUS CRACKING, OR CRACKING FROM ENTIRELY INSIGNIFICANT CHIPS ON OUTBACK WINDSHIELDS. MY OLDER OUTBACK HAS 160,000 MILES AND NUMEROUS PITS AND MARKS ON THE WINDSHIELD WITH NO CRACKING. DITTO WITH THE OLD LEGACY WAGON I OWNED BEFORE THAT. I'VE NEVER HEARD OF WINDSHIELDS CRACKING THE WAY THEY ARE ON THE NEW EYESIGHT EQUIPPED VEHICLES. I BELIEVE THERE IS A DEFECT IN MANUFACTURE THAT RESULTS IN THE WINDSHIELDS BEING UNDER ENORMOUS PRESSURE. IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE A SPONTANEOUS CRACK SHOOTS THROUGH SOMEONE'S LINE OF SIGHT AS THEY ARE DRIVING AND CAUSES AN ACCIDENT. SUBARU NEEDS TO BE ORDERED TO RECALL THESE VEHICLES AND FIND A WAY A TO PREVENT THIS. I FORESEE A CLASS ACTION SUIT PARTICULARLY IN LIGHT OF THOSE WHO HAVE REPORTED TWO OR THREE DESTROYED WINDSHIELDS IN THE FIRST MONTHS OF VEHICLE USE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10705316

Official recalls

5

16V292000 · Steering:column

May 11, 2016

Subaru of America, Inc. (Subaru) is recalling certain model year 2016-2017 Legacy and Outback vehicles manufactured February 29, 2016, to May 6, 2016. The steering column on the affected vehicles may have been improperly machined, and as a result, turning the steering wheel may have no effect on the direction of the wheels.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: The loss of steering ability would increase the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Subaru will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the lot number on the steering column, replacing the steering column, as necessary, free of charge. The recall began May 13, 2016. Owners may contact Subaru customer service at 1-800-782-2783 or by visiting http://www.wtd65.service-campaign.com. Subaru's number for this recall is WTD-65. Note: Until the vehicles have been inspected, owners are advised not to drive their vehicles.

16V251000 · Electronic Stability Control (esc)

Apr 27, 2016

Subaru of America, Inc. (Subaru) is recalling certain model year 2015 Legacy and Outback vehicles manufactured on July 20, 2015. The brake fluid used in these vehicles may contain excess moisture which may adversely affect the performance of the electronic stability control system. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 126, "Electronic Stability Control Systems."

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Poor performance of the electronic stability control system when it is activated may result in a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Subaru will notify owners, and dealers will perform an ABS activation, then flush and replace the brake fluid, free of charge. The recall began on May 20, 2016. Owners may contact Subaru customer service at 1-800-782-2783. Subaru's number for this recall is WTC-64.

15V502000 · Power Train:automatic Transmission; Power Train:driveline:driveshaft

Aug 10, 2015

Subaru of America, Inc. (Subaru) is recalling certain 2015 and 2016 model year Subaru Legacy 4-Door and Outback vehicles manufactured July 3, 2015, to July 27, 2015. Transmission oil may leak from a deformed seal cap on the propeller shaft yoke.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the transmission oil leaks onto the exhaust pipe, there is a possible risk of fire.

Remedy: Subaru will notify owners, and dealers will replace the propeller shaft, free of charge. The recall began on August 28, 2015. Owners may contact 1-800-782-2783. Subaru's number for this recall is WQU-56.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Power Train:driveline:driveshaft

Subaru of America, Inc. (Subaru) is recalling certain 2015 and 2016 model year Subaru Legacy 4-Door and Outback vehicles manufactured July 3, 2015, to July 27, 2015. Transmission oil may leak from a deformed seal cap on the propeller shaft yoke.

Consequence: If the transmission oil leaks onto the exhaust pipe, there is a possible risk of fire.

Remedy: Subaru will notify owners, and dealers will replace the propeller shaft, free of charge. The recall began on August 28, 2015. Owners may contact 1-800-782-2783. Subaru's number for this recall is WQU-56.

Power Train:automatic Transmission

Subaru of America, Inc. (Subaru) is recalling certain 2015 and 2016 model year Subaru Legacy 4-Door and Outback vehicles manufactured July 3, 2015, to July 27, 2015. Transmission oil may leak from a deformed seal cap on the propeller shaft yoke.

Consequence: If the transmission oil leaks onto the exhaust pipe, there is a possible risk of fire.

Remedy: Subaru will notify owners, and dealers will replace the propeller shaft, free of charge. The recall began on August 28, 2015. Owners may contact 1-800-782-2783. Subaru's number for this recall is WQU-56.

15V366000 · Exterior Lighting:brake Lights:switch; Forward Collision Avoidance: Crash Imminent Braking

Jun 12, 2015

Subaru of America, Inc. (Subaru) is recalling certain model year 2015 Legacy vehicles manufactured March 10, 2014, to April 16, 2015, Outback vehicles manufactured February 24, 2014, to April 16, 2015, Impreza vehicles manufactured September 9, 2014, to April 14, 2015, XV Crosstrek vehicles manufactured October 16, 2014, to April 15, 2015, and 2016 WRX vehicles manufactured March 23, 2015, and equipped with the Eyesight Driver Assist System. If the switch that activates the brake lights fails, the automatic pre-collision braking component of the driver assist system will not function.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the automatic pre-collision braking system does not function as intended, the vehicle will not react to an obstacle in its path, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Subaru will notify owners, and dealers will reprogram the driver assist system, free of charge. The recall began on July 20, 2015. Owners may contact Subaru customer service at 1-800-782-2783. Subaru's number for this recall is WQS-54.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Forward Collision Avoidance: Crash Imminent Braking

Subaru of America, Inc. (Subaru) is recalling certain model year 2015 Legacy vehicles manufactured March 10, 2014, to April 16, 2015, Outback vehicles manufactured February 24, 2014, to April 16, 2015, Impreza vehicles manufactured September 9, 2014, to April 14, 2015, XV Crosstrek vehicles manufactured October 16, 2014, to April 15, 2015, and 2016 WRX vehicles manufactured March 23, 2015, and equipped with the Eyesight Driver Assist System. If the switch that activates the brake lights fails, the automatic pre-collision braking component of the driver assist system will not function.

Consequence: If the automatic pre-collision braking system does not function as intended, the vehicle will not react to an obstacle in its path, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Subaru will notify owners, and dealers will reprogram the driver assist system, free of charge. The recall began on July 20, 2015. Owners may contact Subaru customer service at 1-800-782-2783. Subaru's number for this recall is WQS-54.

Exterior Lighting:brake Lights:switch

Subaru of America, Inc. (Subaru) is recalling certain model year 2015 Legacy vehicles manufactured March 10, 2014, to April 16, 2015, Outback vehicles manufactured February 24, 2014, to April 16, 2015, Impreza vehicles manufactured September 9, 2014, to April 14, 2015, XV Crosstrek vehicles manufactured October 16, 2014, to April 15, 2015, and 2016 WRX vehicles manufactured March 23, 2015, and equipped with the Eyesight Driver Assist System. If the switch that activates the brake lights fails, the automatic pre-collision braking component of the driver assist system will not function.

Consequence: If the automatic pre-collision braking system does not function as intended, the vehicle will not react to an obstacle in its path, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Subaru will notify owners, and dealers will reprogram the driver assist system, free of charge. The recall began on July 20, 2015. Owners may contact Subaru customer service at 1-800-782-2783. Subaru's number for this recall is WQS-54.

14V577000 · Trailer Hitches

Sep 19, 2014

Subaru of America, Inc. (Subaru) is recalling certain model year 2015 Outback vehicles manufactured January 22, 2014, to August 18, 2014, and equipped with a Subaru accessory trailer hitch assembly. During installation, the trailer hitch mounting nuts may have been overtightened, potentially resulting in failure of the trailer hitch mounting studs.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: The mounting nut(s) may not provide sufficient force to remain attached to the studs or the studs themselves might break. If this were to happen while a trailer is being towed, the driver might not be able to operate the vehicle as desired or the trailer may detach from the vehicle. Either situation could increase the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Subaru will notify owners, and dealers will replace all eight mounting nuts for the trailer hitch assembly, and will inspect all eight mounting studs for damage, free of charge. The recall began on October 7, 2014. Owners may contact Subaru customer service at 1-800-782-2783. Subaru's number for this recall is WQN-50.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

EA21002 · Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture

Opened Sep 17, 2021 · No close date supplied

Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module; Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Go deeper into Subaru Outback problems