IllustrationWHEN APPLYING BRAKES AT 40 MPH AND HIGHER THERE IS VIBRATION. VEHICLE HAS BEEN TAKEN TO DEALER 4-5 TIMES, NO PROBLEM WAS FOUND.*AK
1999 Oldsmobile Alero
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
Similar to other model years
Owner complaints for the 1999 Oldsmobile Alero do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 279.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Alero years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
150–25K
3625–50K
5550–75K
3575–100K
21100–150K
7150K+
169 reports with mileage · 293 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 111 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Electrical System. Review the 89 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Engine And Engine Cooling. Review the 85 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
14 crash reports11 fire reports13 injury reports
Service Brakes, Hydraulic complaints
111 reportsWHEN APPLYING BRAKES STEERING WHEEL VIBRATES, MOSTLY AT HIGH SPEED. ROTORS WERE TURNED AT 13000 MILES, REPLACED AT 16000 MILES. THEY WERE WARPED. AT THIS TIME ROTORS NEED TO BE REPLACED AGAIN.*AK
WHEN APPLYING BRAKES THERE IS A CLICKING NOISE THAT COMES FROM BRAKE AREA. CONTACTED DEALER. *AK THE BRAKES PULSATE AND CONSUMER HAS TO USE EXCESSIVE EFFORT IN PUSHING THE PEDAL DOWN BEFORE BRAKING ENGAGES. THE BRAKES ALSO SQUEAL WHEN THEY ARE APPLIED, PRIOR TO AND AFTER THE PADS AND ROTORS WERE REPLACED. *JG
I HAVE TAKEN THE VEHICAL TO BE FIXED UNDER WARRANTY 3 TIME STARTING IN JULY 2000, SEPT 2001 AT THE SAME DEALERSHIP (SCHAUMBURG OLDS) AND THIRD TIME TO MARTIN J KELLY. FIRST TWO TIME, THE PROBLEM WAS THAT THE WHEN DEPRESSING THE BRAKES I GOT A PULSATION AND VIBRATION FELT THROUGH THE PEDAL. THE THIRD TIME, THE ROTORS SOUNDED AS I…
Read full complaint
I HAVE TAKEN THE VEHICAL TO BE FIXED UNDER WARRANTY 3 TIME STARTING IN JULY 2000, SEPT 2001 AT THE SAME DEALERSHIP (SCHAUMBURG OLDS) AND THIRD TIME TO MARTIN J KELLY. FIRST TWO TIME, THE PROBLEM WAS THAT THE WHEN DEPRESSING THE BRAKES I GOT A PULSATION AND VIBRATION FELT THROUGH THE PEDAL. THE THIRD TIME, THE ROTORS SOUNDED AS IF THEYW ERE GRINDING AND BRAKING WAS DIFFICULT TO APPLY. FIRST TIME THE VEHICVAL HAD 7957 MILES AND THIRD TIME 21,000 MILES. I AM GOING TO TAKE THE VEHICAL BACK AGAIN NEXT WEEK BECAUSE THE GRINDING SOUND HAS NOW RETURNED EVEN WHEN BRAKES ARE NOT APPLIED AND THE CAR IS ROLLING. THERE WOULD APPEAR TO BE A MANUFACTURER DEFECT FOR THE VEHICAL TO REQUIRE SUCH A REPEATED NUMBER OF TRIPS TO THE DEALER. THE DEALERS HAVE RESURFACED THE ROTORS AND MAY HAVE CHANGED THEM ON ONE OCCASION. MY CONCERN IS WEHETHER THE BRAKES ON THE VEHICAL WILL FAIL AT SOME POINT IN TIME AS A RESULT OF THIS ROTOR/BRAKE ISSUE.*AK
CONSUMER STATES WHILE DRIVING AT ANY SPEED AND WHEN APPLYING BRAKES, WITHOUT WARNING THE FRONT END OF VEHICLE WILL VIBRATE VIOLENTLY HAS HAD BRAKES REPAIRED TWICE AND HAVE NOTIFIED DEALER AND MANUFACTURER.*JB *TT
WHEN BACKING UP AND APPLYING BRAKES PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR, NO BRAKING ACTION. VEHICLE HIT ANOTHER VEHICLE. DAMAGE WAS $ 2500.00, NO INJURIES.*AK
CONSUMER HAS REPLACED FRONT BRAKE SYSTEM ABOUT 6 TIMES. MECHANIC STATED THERE WAS A SERVICE BULLETIN. HOWEVER, HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO REPAIR THE OCCURRING PROBLEM. *AK
DEALER REPAIRED ROTORS TWICE, REPLACED ROTORS ONCE AND THEY ARE WARPED AGAIN. *AK
THE DEALER FOUND THAT THE VEHICLE HAD FAULTY ROTORS AS A RESULT THE VEHICLE DRIVES ERRATIC AT TIMES. NLM
BRAKES FAILED AND SHAKED THE WHOLE CAR. REPAIRED FIVE TIMES. DRIVERS SIDE SEAT BELT BROKEN.
Official recalls
314V400000 · Electrical System:ignition
Jul 3, 2014
This defect can affect the safe operation of the airbag system. Until this recall is performed, customers should remove all items from their key rings, leaving only the ignition key. The key fob (if applicable), should also be removed from the key ring. General Motors LLC (GM) notified the agency on July 3, 2014, that they are recalling 5,877,718 model year 2000-2005 Chevrolet Impala and Monte Carlo, 1997-2003 Chevrolet Malibu, 2004-2005 Malibu Classic, 1999-2004 Oldsmobile Alero, 1998-2002 Oldsmobile Intrigue, 1999-2005 Pontiac Grand Am and 2004-2008 Pontiac Grand Prix vehicles. In these models, the weight on the key ring and/or road conditions or some other jarring event may cause the ignition switch to move out of the run position, turning off the engine.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: If the key is not in the run position, the air bags may not deploy if the vehicle is involved in a crash, increasing the risk of injury.
Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will install two key rings and an insert in the key slot or a cover over the key head on all ignition keys, free of charge. The recall began on September 9, 2014. GM's number for this recall is 14350.
00V140000 · Structure:body
May 18, 2000
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: THESE VEHICLES DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE OCCUPANT PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS OF FMVSS NO. 201, "OCCUPANT PROTECTION IN INTERIOR IMPACT." THE CONSOLE COVER ON THESE VEHICLES DOES NOT STAY CLOSED WHEN A SPECIFIED VERTICAL LOAD IS APPLIED.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH, THE CONSOLE COVER COULD OPEN AND THE COVER OR ITEMS STORED UNDER IT COULD INJURE AN OCCUPANT.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE CONSOLE LATCH MECHANISM.
98V320000 · Steering: Steering Wheel/handle Bar
Dec 15, 1998
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE STEERING WHEEL CAN COME LOOSE FROM THE STEERING SHAFT BECAUSE THE STEERING WHEEL RETAINING NUT COULD HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY TIGHTENED.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THIS CONDITION COULD CAUSE A LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE STEERING WHEEL RETAINING NUT FOR CORRECT TIGHTNESS AND TIGHTEN IF NECESSARY.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
1RQ04005 · Turn Signal Failures
Opened Jun 18, 2004 · Closed Nov 30, 2004
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Exterior Lighting:hazard Flashing Warning Lights:switch; Exterior Lighting:turn Signal:switch
GM CONDUCTED A RECALL (NHTSA RECALL NUMBER 03V327) ON MODEL YEAR (MY) 2000-2001 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES TO REPLACE DEFECTIVE HAZARD SWITCHES THAT CAUSE THE TURN SIGNALS AND HAZARD LIGHTS TO FAIL.THE RECALL COVERED VEHICLES BUILT FROM FEBRUARY 2000 THROUGH MAY 2001 (DEPENDING ON MODEL).ODI OPENED THIS INVESTIGATION BASED ON 64 REPORTS ALLEGING TURN SIGNAL FAILURE ON MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER THE RECALL AND BUILT PRIOR TO FEBRUARY 2000.IN DECEMBER 2004, GM WILL ISSUE A SPECIAL POLICY FOR MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER RECALL 03V327.THE POLICY COVERS TURN SIGNAL/HAZARD FLASHER FAILURE FOR A PERIOD OF 10 YEARS OR 150,000 MILES (WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST) TO PROVIDE A NO COST REPLACEMENT OF THE HAZARD SWITCH.GM WILL SEND LETTERS TO OWNERS STARTING DECEMBER 30, 2004.THE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE MANUFACTURER IS SUFFICIENT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUES RAISED BY THIS INVESTIGATION.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE FUTURE ACTION IF WARRANTED BY THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Exterior Lighting:hazard Flashing Warning Lights:switch
GM CONDUCTED A RECALL (NHTSA RECALL NUMBER 03V327) ON MODEL YEAR (MY) 2000-2001 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES TO REPLACE DEFECTIVE HAZARD SWITCHES THAT CAUSE THE TURN SIGNALS AND HAZARD LIGHTS TO FAIL.THE RECALL COVERED VEHICLES BUILT FROM FEBRUARY 2000 THROUGH MAY 2001 (DEPENDING ON MODEL).ODI OPENED THIS INVESTIGATION BASED ON 64 REPORTS ALLEGING TURN SIGNAL FAILURE ON MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER THE RECALL AND BUILT PRIOR TO FEBRUARY 2000.IN DECEMBER 2004, GM WILL ISSUE A SPECIAL POLICY FOR MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER RECALL 03V327.THE POLICY COVERS TURN SIGNAL/HAZARD FLASHER FAILURE FOR A PERIOD OF 10 YEARS OR 150,000 MILES (WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST) TO PROVIDE A NO COST REPLACEMENT OF THE HAZARD SWITCH.GM WILL SEND LETTERS TO OWNERS STARTING DECEMBER 30, 2004.THE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE MANUFACTURER IS SUFFICIENT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUES RAISED BY THIS INVESTIGATION.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE FUTURE ACTION IF WARRANTED BY THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
Exterior Lighting:turn Signal:switch
GM CONDUCTED A RECALL (NHTSA RECALL NUMBER 03V327) ON MODEL YEAR (MY) 2000-2001 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES TO REPLACE DEFECTIVE HAZARD SWITCHES THAT CAUSE THE TURN SIGNALS AND HAZARD LIGHTS TO FAIL.THE RECALL COVERED VEHICLES BUILT FROM FEBRUARY 2000 THROUGH MAY 2001 (DEPENDING ON MODEL).ODI OPENED THIS INVESTIGATION BASED ON 64 REPORTS ALLEGING TURN SIGNAL FAILURE ON MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER THE RECALL AND BUILT PRIOR TO FEBRUARY 2000.IN DECEMBER 2004, GM WILL ISSUE A SPECIAL POLICY FOR MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER RECALL 03V327.THE POLICY COVERS TURN SIGNAL/HAZARD FLASHER FAILURE FOR A PERIOD OF 10 YEARS OR 150,000 MILES (WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST) TO PROVIDE A NO COST REPLACEMENT OF THE HAZARD SWITCH.GM WILL SEND LETTERS TO OWNERS STARTING DECEMBER 30, 2004.THE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE MANUFACTURER IS SUFFICIENT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUES RAISED BY THIS INVESTIGATION.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE FUTURE ACTION IF WARRANTED BY THE CIRCUMSTANCES.