← New search

2017 Nissan Rogue

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2017 Nissan Rogue do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 320.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

299 reports with mileage · 297 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Power Train. Review the 122 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 111 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Forward Collision Avoidance. Review the 76 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

57 crash reports8 fire reports42 injury reports

Service Brakes complaints

111 reports
Clear category filter
22,609 miles · Apr 10, 2019
Service Brakes

I WAS TRAVELLING IN TEANECK, NJ, GOING EAST ON CHURCHILL ROAD , APPROACHING TTHE INTERSECTION OF WINDSOR ROAD. I ATTEMPTED TO SLOW MY VEHICLE, IN ORDER TO MAKE A RIGHT TURN. I STEPPED ON THE BRAKE PEDAL, BUT THE CAR DID NOT SLOW DOWN OR STOP. AS A RESULT, I WENT THROUGH THE INTERSECTION, HIT THE CURB, AND WENT OFF THE ROAD, FINA…

Read full complaint

I WAS TRAVELLING IN TEANECK, NJ, GOING EAST ON CHURCHILL ROAD , APPROACHING TTHE INTERSECTION OF WINDSOR ROAD. I ATTEMPTED TO SLOW MY VEHICLE, IN ORDER TO MAKE A RIGHT TURN. I STEPPED ON THE BRAKE PEDAL, BUT THE CAR DID NOT SLOW DOWN OR STOP. AS A RESULT, I WENT THROUGH THE INTERSECTION, HIT THE CURB, AND WENT OFF THE ROAD, FINALLY COMING TO A STOP IN A GRASSY AREA.

NHTSA ODI #11195404

24,000 miles · Apr 6, 2019
Electronic Stability Control (esc)Service BrakesVehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

ON MARCH 16TH I HAD A ACCIDENT THAT WAS A RESULT OF A KNOWN ISSUE THAT NISSAN IS NOT ADDRESSING (MORE IF I AT WWW.NISSANPROBLEMS.COM/AEB ). BASICALLY, WHEN LEAVING A PARKING GARAGE MY CAR SUDDENLY MADE BEEP BEEP BEEP SOUNDS AND STOPPED ON ITS OWN AND THE CAR BEHIND ME HIT MY CAR. I HAVE ALREADY REACHED TO THE INSURANCE WHER…

Read full complaint

ON MARCH 16TH I HAD A ACCIDENT THAT WAS A RESULT OF A KNOWN ISSUE THAT NISSAN IS NOT ADDRESSING (MORE IF I AT WWW.NISSANPROBLEMS.COM/AEB ). BASICALLY, WHEN LEAVING A PARKING GARAGE MY CAR SUDDENLY MADE BEEP BEEP BEEP SOUNDS AND STOPPED ON ITS OWN AND THE CAR BEHIND ME HIT MY CAR. I HAVE ALREADY REACHED TO THE INSURANCE WHERE I WOULD JUST NEED TO PAY $500 DEDUCTIBLE FOR THE FIX HOWEVER THE FIX WOULD ONLY HANDLE THE BUMPER FIXING AND NOT THE FACT THAT THE CAR IS DEFECTIVE. I'D OBVIOUSLY DON'T WANT TO KEEP THIS CAR. IN THIS CASE I'D BE LOOKING FOR ASSISTANCE WITH NISSAN, WITH LEASE TERMINATION AND WITH BODY INJURIES. NISSAN REQUIRES THE CAR TO BE UNTOUCHED FOR THEIR 'INVESTIGATION' IN A CERTIFIED LOCATION (THEY CLAIM MY CURRENT SHOP IS NOT CERTIFIED EVEN THOUGH IT IS LISTED IN THEIR SITE IT IS) WHERE THE ENTIRE PROCESS WOULD TAKE BETWEEN 4-12 WEEKS. DURING THIS TIME THE CAR CAN'T BE TOUCHED AND OF COURSE NOT DRIVEN. NO RESOLUTION OFFERED TO MEANTIME TRANSPORTATION AND EXPENSE COVERAGE.

NHTSA ODI #11194380

38,000 miles · Mar 31, 2019
Service Brakes

UNAVAILABLE FRONT RADAR OBSTRUCTION, HAPPENED WHILE DRIVING

NHTSA ODI #11192719

24,535 miles · Mar 19, 2019
Service BrakesUnknown Or Other

'LEASE STARTED IN 08/17 (CAR HAS AN AUTO SENOR (AS)) '11/11/17: BROUGHT MY CAR TO THE SERVICE CENTER, AS ACTIVATED WITH NO CARS AROUND. THE SHOP SCANNED THE SYSTEM, SAID THERE WAS A RADAR STAIN. THEY CLEARED THE SYSTEM AND GAVE IT BACK '12/06/17: BROUGHT MY CAR TO THE SERVICE CENTER, AS ACTIVATED WITH NO CARS AROUND. 'THE SH…

Read full complaint

'LEASE STARTED IN 08/17 (CAR HAS AN AUTO SENOR (AS)) '11/11/17: BROUGHT MY CAR TO THE SERVICE CENTER, AS ACTIVATED WITH NO CARS AROUND. THE SHOP SCANNED THE SYSTEM, SAID THERE WAS A RADAR STAIN. THEY CLEARED THE SYSTEM AND GAVE IT BACK '12/06/17: BROUGHT MY CAR TO THE SERVICE CENTER, AS ACTIVATED WITH NO CARS AROUND. 'THE SHOP SCANNED THE SYSTEM, SAID THAT THERE WAS A RADAR STAIN. THEY CLEARED THE SYSTEM AND GAVE IT BACK '08/17/2018: BROUGHT MY CAR TO THE SERVICE CENTER, THERE WAS A RECALL FOR THE AS PART. THEY REPLACED THE SENOR AND REPROGRAMED THE SYSTEM, CAR WAS GIVEN BACK '01/14/19: AS ACTIVATED WITH NO CARS AROUND IT, INFORMED THE DEALERSHIP AND THEY SAID CONTACT CORPORATE. CALLED CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND ASSIGNED A CASE MANAGER (CM) '01/15/19: EXPLAINED MY SITUATION TO THE CM AND SHE EXPLAINED THE PROCESS. SHE INFORMED ME I WOULD HEAR BACK IN 10 DAYS IF NISSAN WOULD BUY BACK MY CAR OR PUT ME IN ANOTHER CAR. THE SERVICE CENTER MANAGER DROVE MY CAR, TO DUPLICATE THE ISSUE BUT DIDN'T '01/18/19: CM CALLED AND INFORMED ME I SHOULD HEAR SOMETHING BY 01/23/19 '01/23/19 :CM CALLED AND INFORMED ME THAT I WILL HEAR SOMETHING BY MONDAY '01/28/19: CM CALLED AND INFORMED ME THAT NISSAN WON'T BUY THE CAR BACK OR PUT ME IN ANOTHER CAR. I WAS INFORMED THAT A CORPORATE TECHNICIAN WOULD COME ON 02/07/19 TO INSPECT THE CAR. I ASKED TO SPEAK TO A MANAGER ON 01/29/2019, MY CM MANAGERS CALLED AND INFORMED ME THAT THERE IS NOTHING THEY CAN DO AND I CAN CALL THE BBB '02/07/219:TECHNICIAN CALLED TO GET A SPECIFIC LOCATION OF THE INCIDENT, TO TRY TO REENACT '02/11/19: CM INFORMED ME THE TECHNICIAN WAS UNABLE TO REENACT THE INCIDENT AND THEY WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO MAKE REPAIRS TO THE CAR '03/07/19: AS ACTIVATED AND NO CARS WERE AROUND IT ' CALLED THE DEALERSHIP AND BROUGHT MY CAR TO THE SERVICE CENTER ON 03/12/19. INFORMED THAT THEY COULDN'T DO ANYTHING AND TO HANDLE WITH CORPORATE

NHTSA ODI #11189976

13,500 miles · Mar 13, 2019
SeatsService BrakesSuspension

IF THIS FEEDBACK GOES TO MAIN CORPORATE I WILL BE GLAD TO SHARE MY EXPERIENCE.I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO GET A BETTER SERVICE FROM NISSAN. BOUGHT MY NEW NISSAN 2017 ON DECEMBER 29TH 2017 AND I HAVE BEEN TO THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT SEVERAL TIME IN 2018 AND 2019 AND FOR A PROOF YOU GUYS CAN ACCESS THE REPAIR LOG. EVERY TIME THEY HAVE …

Read full complaint

IF THIS FEEDBACK GOES TO MAIN CORPORATE I WILL BE GLAD TO SHARE MY EXPERIENCE.I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO GET A BETTER SERVICE FROM NISSAN. BOUGHT MY NEW NISSAN 2017 ON DECEMBER 29TH 2017 AND I HAVE BEEN TO THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT SEVERAL TIME IN 2018 AND 2019 AND FOR A PROOF YOU GUYS CAN ACCESS THE REPAIR LOG. EVERY TIME THEY HAVE BEEN CHANGING PARTS AND I FEEL THAT THIS CAR IS HAS RECALL OR THEY HAVE SOLD ME THE WORST DEFECTIVE ONE. AFTER TALKING TO WARRANTY DEPARTMENT AS IT HAS BEEN 14000 MILES SERVICE DUE, REQUESTED THEM ALSO TO PROVIDE APPRAISAL. IT WAS DEVASTATING AND UPSETTING ON TALKING TO THE SALES DIRECTOR HE HAS APPRAISED MY CAR $17000 , AS I HAVE PAID $31000 LESS THAN 15K MILES ASKED HIM HOW COME THAT UPSETTING PRICE. HE TOLD ME THATS WHAT THEY CAN OFFER. LEARNED LESSON THAT NISSAN CARS ARE THE WORST AND THEY HAVE NO VALUE EVEN THOUGH THE CAR IS BRAND NEW LESS THAN A YEAR MODEL. NEVER EVER RECOMMEND TO ANYONE

NHTSA ODI #11186337

47,000 miles · Feb 13, 2019
Air BagsService BrakesCrash

BRAKES DID NOT ENGAGE WHEN BRAKING. WAS IN BUMPER TO BUMPER TRAFFIC LET CAR IN FRONT OF ME TO GO A 1.5 CAR LENGTHS BEFORE I TOOK FOOT OF THE BRAKE NEVER HIT THE GAS COASTED UNTIL I WAS 1/2 A CAR LENGTH FROM THE CAR IN FRONT OF ME AND WENT TO HIT THE BRAKES AGAIN AND IT DID NOT ENGAGE CAUSING ME TO HIT THE BACK OF THE VEHICLE IN …

Read full complaint

BRAKES DID NOT ENGAGE WHEN BRAKING. WAS IN BUMPER TO BUMPER TRAFFIC LET CAR IN FRONT OF ME TO GO A 1.5 CAR LENGTHS BEFORE I TOOK FOOT OF THE BRAKE NEVER HIT THE GAS COASTED UNTIL I WAS 1/2 A CAR LENGTH FROM THE CAR IN FRONT OF ME AND WENT TO HIT THE BRAKES AGAIN AND IT DID NOT ENGAGE CAUSING ME TO HIT THE BACK OF THE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF ME. MEANWHILE THE AIRBAGS DID NOT DEPLOY EVEN THOUGH IMPACT SPEED WAS 2 MPH I BELIEVE THE AIRBAGS SHOULD HAVE GONE OFF WITH HOW FAR THE HOOD GOT SMASHED.

NHTSA ODI #11179858

35,000 miles · Jan 31, 2019
Electrical SystemService Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 NISSAN ROGUE. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 50 MPH, THE SENSOR IN THE FRONT BUMPER ENGAGED AND LOCKED THE BRAKES, CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO SLOW DOWN. THE "SYSTEM LOCK-DOWN" INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO TED RUSSELL NISSAN (865-223-6744, LOCATED AT 8565 KINGSTON PIKE, KNOXVILLE, TN 37919)…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 NISSAN ROGUE. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 50 MPH, THE SENSOR IN THE FRONT BUMPER ENGAGED AND LOCKED THE BRAKES, CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO SLOW DOWN. THE "SYSTEM LOCK-DOWN" INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO TED RUSSELL NISSAN (865-223-6744, LOCATED AT 8565 KINGSTON PIKE, KNOXVILLE, TN 37919) WHERE THE SENSORS WERE REPLACED, BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE AND OFFERED TO PAY 50 PERCENT OF THE REPAIR COSTS. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED, BUT THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE SAFETY ISSUE WAS NOT ADDRESSED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 35,000. THE VIN WAS NOT PROVIDED.

NHTSA ODI #11173302

1,300 miles · Jan 7, 2019
Service BrakesCrashInjury

TL* THE CONTACT OWNED A 2017 NISSAN ROGUE. WHILE DRIVING 20 MPH, ANOTHER VEHICLE WAS IN THE CONTACT'S BLIND SPOT AND DRIVING WITHOUT THE HEADLIGHTS ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT ATTEMPTED TO STOP, BUT THE BRAKES SEIZED. THE CONTACT HEARD AN ABNORMAL BUMPING NOISE COMING FROM THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE COULD NOT STOP AND THE…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNED A 2017 NISSAN ROGUE. WHILE DRIVING 20 MPH, ANOTHER VEHICLE WAS IN THE CONTACT'S BLIND SPOT AND DRIVING WITHOUT THE HEADLIGHTS ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT ATTEMPTED TO STOP, BUT THE BRAKES SEIZED. THE CONTACT HEARD AN ABNORMAL BUMPING NOISE COMING FROM THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE COULD NOT STOP AND THE CONTACT CRASHED INTO THE OTHER VEHICLE IN HIS BLIND SPOT. THE AIR BAG DEPLOYED AFTER THE CRASH. THE CONTACT SUSTAINED INJURIES TO HIS LEG, BUT DID NOT SEEK MEDICAL ATTENTION. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE CONTACT ATTEMPTED TO CALL MOMENTUM NISSAN (2545 AUTO MALL PKWY, FAIRFIELD, CA 94533, (707) 402-3200) WHERE THE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED; HOWEVER, ALL SEVEN LOCATIONS AFTER CLOSED AFTER REPORTS OF TOO MANY VEHICLES BEING SOLD WITH MULTIPLE FAILURES. THE VEHICLE WAS TOTALED AND TOWED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 1,300.

NHTSA ODI #11164965

3,000 miles · Nov 23, 2018
Service BrakesUnknown Or Other

THREE TIMES I HAVE BEEN DRIVING DOWN THE ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY 35 - 45 MPH WITH NO OBSTRUCTIONS OR VEHICLES WHEN THE CAR SUDDENLY BEEPED THE COLLISION WARNING AND AUTOMATICALLY APPLIED THE BRAKES AND ALMOST COMPLETELY STOPPED THE VEHICLE. I WAS ALMOST REAR ENDED ON TWO OCCASIONS BY THE VEHICLE THAT WAS BEHIND ME AS THERE WAS NO …

Read full complaint

THREE TIMES I HAVE BEEN DRIVING DOWN THE ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY 35 - 45 MPH WITH NO OBSTRUCTIONS OR VEHICLES WHEN THE CAR SUDDENLY BEEPED THE COLLISION WARNING AND AUTOMATICALLY APPLIED THE BRAKES AND ALMOST COMPLETELY STOPPED THE VEHICLE. I WAS ALMOST REAR ENDED ON TWO OCCASIONS BY THE VEHICLE THAT WAS BEHIND ME AS THERE WAS NO REASON TO STOP. I BROUGHT INTO DEALERSHIP TWO TIMES AND WAS TOLD THEY COULD NOT FIND ANY CODES AND THEY CLEANED OFF THE CAMERA AREA (I KEEP THE CAR RELATIVELY CLEAN). THEY TOLD ME TO TURN OFF THE PROXIMITY ALERT SYSTEM TO HELP PREVENT THE PROBLEM. THERE IS A SERIOUS ISSUE WITH NISSAN'S COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM THAT IS VERY DANGEROUS AND NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED AND RESOLVED. MY WIFE IS AFRAID TO DRIVE THE VEHICLE AS SHE WAS WITH ME TWICE WHEN IT HAPPENED. PLEASE ISSUE A RECALL OR SOMETHING AS NISSAN IS NOT FIXING THE ISSUE OR INVESTIGATING THE PROBLEM. MY VEHICLE HAD BETWEEN 3,000 AND 9,000 MILES WHEN THESE EVENTS OCCURRED.

NHTSA ODI #11153334

16,100 miles · Oct 28, 2018
Air BagsForward Collision AvoidanceService BrakesCrash

MY DAUGHTER WAS AT A TRAFFIC LIGHT BEHIND A JEEP. THE CARS BEGAN TO DRIVE FORWARD AFTER THE LIGHT TURNED GREEN. AS THEY WERE SPEEDING UP, THE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF HER SLAMMED ON HIS BRAKES AND THE ROGUE DID NOT STOP AND RAN INTO THE JEEP.I LEASED THIS CAR FOR SAFETY FEATURES THAT DID NOT DO WHAT THEY ARE ADVERTISED TO TO DO. FORW…

Read full complaint

MY DAUGHTER WAS AT A TRAFFIC LIGHT BEHIND A JEEP. THE CARS BEGAN TO DRIVE FORWARD AFTER THE LIGHT TURNED GREEN. AS THEY WERE SPEEDING UP, THE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF HER SLAMMED ON HIS BRAKES AND THE ROGUE DID NOT STOP AND RAN INTO THE JEEP.I LEASED THIS CAR FOR SAFETY FEATURES THAT DID NOT DO WHAT THEY ARE ADVERTISED TO TO DO. FORWARD EMERGENCY BRAKING DID NOT ACTIVATE, NO AUDIBLE ALERTS, AND AIR BAGS DID NOT DEPLOY. MY DAUGHTER HIT A VEHICLE IN FRONT OF HER AND CAUSED ABOUT $8,000 IN DAMAGE.

NHTSA ODI #11143570

Official recalls

5

23V093000 · Electrical SYSTEM:IGNITION:ANTI-THEFT:IMMOBILIZER/PROXIMITY:KEY/SENDER

Feb 16, 2023

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2014-2020 Rogue and 2017-2022 Rogue Sport vehicles equipped with a jackknife style ignition key. The jackknife key may collapse into a folded position while driving.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Driver contact with a key in the collapsed position could inadvertently shut off the vehicle while driving, increasing the risk of a crash. Additionally, if the vehicle shuts off while driving, the air bags may not deploy in a crash as intended, increasing the risk of injury.

Remedy: Dealers will insert a spacer into the key slot of the jackknife key, free of charge. Interim notification letters notifying owners of the safety risk were mailed March 29, 2023. Owner notification letters are expected to be mailed August 30, 2023. Owners may contact Nissan's customer service at 1-800-867-7669. Nissan's number for this recall is R22C5.

22V875000 · Electrical System:wiring

Nov 23, 2022

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2017 Rogue vehicles. Water may leak into and corrode the dash side harness connector.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A corroded dash side harness connector increases the risk of a fire.

Remedy: Dealers will apply grease and repair any corroded connector as necessary, free of charge. Owner notification letters are expected to be mailed January 20, 2023. Owners may contact Nissan's customer service at 1-800-867-7669. Nissan's number for this recall is PC934.

21V839000 · Engine And Engine Cooling:engine:engine Control Module (ecu/ecm); Hybrid Propulsion System

Oct 26, 2021

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2017-2019 Rogue Hybrid vehicles. Contact with the Electronic Control Module (ECM) bracket may damage the engine harness, causing a blown fuse.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A blown fuse may cause an engine stall, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Dealers will install a harness protector cover, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed December 16, 2021. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-867-7669. Nissan's number for this recall is R21B6.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Engine And Engine Cooling:engine:engine Control Module (ecu/ecm)

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2017-2019 Rogue Hybrid vehicles. Contact with the Electronic Control Module (ECM) bracket may damage the engine harness, causing a blown fuse.

Consequence: A blown fuse may cause an engine stall, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Dealers will install a harness protector cover, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed December 16, 2021. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-867-7669. Nissan's number for this recall is R21B6.

Hybrid Propulsion System

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2017-2019 Rogue Hybrid vehicles. Contact with the Electronic Control Module (ECM) bracket may damage the engine harness, causing a blown fuse.

Consequence: A blown fuse may cause an engine stall, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Dealers will install a harness protector cover, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed December 16, 2021. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-867-7669. Nissan's number for this recall is R21B6.

17V663000 · Seat Belts; Seats

Oct 18, 2017

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2016-2017 Nissan Rogue vehicles. The recliner joints on the lower seat frame for the rear seats may have improper welds. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) number 207, "Seating Systems," and 210, "Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages."

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: The insufficient welds can increase the risk of injury to the occupants in the event of a crash.

Remedy: Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the seat frames and replace any defective lower seat frames, free of charge. The recall began December 6, 2017. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-647-7261.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Seats

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2016-2017 Nissan Rogue vehicles. The recliner joints on the lower seat frame for the rear seats may have improper welds. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) number 207, "Seating Systems," and 210, "Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages."

Consequence: The insufficient welds can increase the risk of injury to the occupants in the event of a crash.

Remedy: Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the seat frames and replace any defective lower seat frames, free of charge. The recall began December 6, 2017. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-647-7261.

Seat Belts

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2016-2017 Nissan Rogue vehicles. The recliner joints on the lower seat frame for the rear seats may have improper welds. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) number 207, "Seating Systems," and 210, "Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages."

Consequence: The insufficient welds can increase the risk of injury to the occupants in the event of a crash.

Remedy: Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the seat frames and replace any defective lower seat frames, free of charge. The recall began December 6, 2017. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-647-7261.

16V244000 · Air Bags:sensor:occupant Classification

Apr 26, 2016

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain model year 2016-2017 Nissan Maxima, 2013-2016 Nissan Altima, NV200, LEAF, Sentra, and Pathfinder, 2014-2016 Nissan NV200 Taxi, Infiniti QX60, QX60 Hybrid, and Q50 Hybrid, 2014-2017 Nissan Rogue and Infiniti Q50, 2015-2016 Nissan Murano, Murano Hybrid, and Chevrolet City Express, 2014-2015 Nissan Pathfinder Hybrid, and 2013 Infiniti JX35 vehicles. In these vehicles, the front seat passenger Occupant Classification System (OCS) may incorrectly classify an adult passenger as a child or classify the seat as empty despite it being occupied. As a result, the passenger frontal air bag may be turned off and not deploy in the event of a crash.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the passenger frontal air bag does not deploy as intended in the event of a crash, the passenger is at an increased risk of injury.

Remedy: Nissan will notify their owners. Chevrolet City Express owners will be notified by General Motors. Dealers will reprogram the Air Bag Control Unit (ACU) and OCS Electronic Control Unit (ECU) in Altima, Maxima, Murano, Rogue, and Sentra vehicles, and replace the OCS ECU in LEAF, NV200, NV200 Taxi, Pathfinder, Infiniti Q50, JX35, and QX60 and Chevrolet City Express vehicles, free of charge. Interim notices were sent to owners on May 31, 2016. Owners will receive a second notice when remedy parts become available. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-867-7669, Infiniti customer service at 1-888-833-3216 or Chevrolet customer service at 1-800-222-1020.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

2

PE19010 · False Automatic Emergency Braking

Opened Sep 9, 2019 · No close date supplied

Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Forward Collision Avoidance: Automatic Emergency Braking

NHTSA received a defect petition (DP19-001) from the Center for Auto Safety (CAS) on March 21, 2019 alleging that the Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) system on Model Year (MY) 2017-2018 Nissan Rogue and Rogue Sport vehicles was engaging in cases where there was no obstruction in the path of the vehicle. The CAS petition additionally alleges that, based on Nissan's actions, the manufacturer is aware of the issue due to issuing a Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) launching two "Quality Actions," and initiating a "Customer Service Initiative" in relation to it. CAS contends that Nissan's actions do not represent an adequate long-term solution to the problem, as the action is only available during the basic coverage period of the warranty. CAS also argues that the alleged failures are an unreasonable risk to safety and views Nissan's communications as not acknowledging the potential safety issue involved, instead treating the alleged problem as a performance update.The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) analyzed Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) complaints received from consumers and identified a total of 129 unique subject vehicle reports (for all submission dates) alleging a false positive triggering of AEB. Of these complaints, three were identified that contained allegations of a collision resulting from the activation of the system, and all three indicating related injuries.In response to ODI's April 15, 2019 Information Request letter, Nissan provided data indicating that it has received 750 unique subject vehicle complaints relating to false positive activation of the AEB system. Of these complaints, 12 were identified that contained allegations of a collision resulting from the activation of the system. Four complaints contained allegations of injuries, three of which were the result of a collision. These complaints included duplicates of complaints that ODI received. The injury allegations were limited to soft tissue type injuries such as whiplash and bruising.Based on its review of the information identified to date, ODI has granted the petition and is opening this preliminary evaluation in order to evaluate the cause, scope and frequency of AEB false positive activations, as well as to evaluate the suitability of the manufacturer's campaign to address the concern or improve performance of the AEB system. The complaints cited can be viewed at NHTSA.gov under the following ODI identification numbers: 11230875, 11230481, 11230361, 11229400, 11229302, 11229294, 11228994, 11223074, 11222925, 11222644, 11220499, 11218713, 11218608, 11217157, 11210334, 11210256, 11210148, 11209127, 11209032, 11207333, 11205931, 11205717, 11205661, 11205172, 11205124, 11205027, 11204803, 11204349, 11204324, 11196805, 11196561, 11196466, 11196091, 11195938, 11195574, 11194380, 11193989, 11192761, 11192283, 11192063, 11190855, 11190840, 11189976, 11187374, 11186903, 11185890, 11185883, 11185132, 11183406, 11180813, 11174713, 11173666, 11173302, 11172299, 11171331, 11170989, 11165434, 11164646, 11162898, 11162502, 11162396, 11161413, 11161230, 11155985, 11155209, 11155181, 11154181, 11153607, 11153334, 11151373, 11151028, 11142595, 11142557, 11142386, 11141775, 11141433, 11141387, 11141347, 11140604, 11139711, 11139226, 11133402, 11132376, 11130998, 11130662, 11129949, 11128704, 11124099, 11123564, 11123353, 11123321, 11122783, 11119475, 11119300, 11118604, 11115088, 11113479, 11113371, 11112371, 11111659, 11111057, 11110919, 11110689, 11104075, 11103844, 11103437, 11102715, 11102333, 11100117, 11099313, 11091006, 11089960, 11089798, 11089533, 11088815, 11088718, 11081072, 11079453, 11073644, 11072718, 11065505, 11061598, 11057739, 11056061, 11055766, 11048349, 11035301, 11033225, and 10972343.

DP19001 · False Automatic Emergency Braking

Opened Apr 8, 2019 · Closed Sep 16, 2019

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Forward Collision Avoidance: Automatic Emergency Braking

NHTSA received a letter from the Center for Auto Safety (CAS) on March 21, 2019 alleging that the Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) system on Model Year (MY) 2017-2018 Nissan Rogue and Rogue Sport vehicles was engaging in cases where there was no obstruction in the path of the vehicle. The CAS petition additionally alleged that, based on Nissan's actions, the manufacturer was aware of the issue due to issuing a Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) launching two Quality Actions, and initiation of a Customer Service Initiative in relation to it. CAS contended that Nissan's actions do not represent an adequate long-term solution to the problem, as the action is only available during the basic coverage period of the warranty. CAS also argued that the alleged failures are an unreasonable risk to safety and views Nissan's communications as not acknowledging the potential safety issue involved, instead treating the alleged problem as a performance update.The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) analyzed Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) complaints received from consumers and identified a total of 129 unique subject vehicle reports (for all submission dates) alleging a false positive triggering of AEB. Of these complaints, three were identified that contained allegations of a collision resulting from the activation of the system, and all three indicating related injuries.In response to ODI's April 15, 2019 Information Request letter, Nissan provided data indicating that it has received 750 unique subject vehicle complaints relating to false positive activation of the AEB system. Of these complaints, 12 were identified that contained allegations of a collision resulting from the activation of the system. Four complaints contained allegations of injuries, three of which were the result of a collision. These complaints included duplicates of complaints that ODI received. The injury allegations were limited to soft tissue type injuries such as whiplash and bruising.Based on its review of the information identified to date, ODI grants this petition and has opened preliminary evaluation PE19-010 in order to evaluate the cause, scope and frequency of AEB false positive activations, as well as to evaluate the suitability of the manufacturer's campaign to address the concern or improve performance of the AEB system. The complaints cited can be viewed at NHTSA.gov under the following ODI identification numbers: 11230875, 11230481, 11230361, 11229400, 11229302, 11229294, 11228994, 11223074, 11222925, 11222644, 11220499, 11218713, 11218608, 11217157, 11210334, 11210256, 11210148, 11209127, 11209032, 11207333, 11205931, 11205717, 11205661, 11205172, 11205124, 11205027, 11204803, 11204349, 11204324, 11196805, 11196561, 11196466, 11196091, 11195938, 11195574, 11194380, 11193989, 11192761, 11192283, 11192063, 11190855, 11190840, 11189976, 11187374, 11186903, 11185890, 11185883, 11185132, 11183406, 11180813, 11174713, 11173666, 11173302, 11172299, 11171331, 11170989, 11165434, 11164646, 11162898, 11162502, 11162396, 11161413, 11161230, 11155985, 11155209, 11155181, 11154181, 11153607, 11153334, 11151373, 11151028, 11142595, 11142557, 11142386, 11141775, 11141433, 11141387, 11141347, 11140604, 11139711, 11139226, 11133402, 11132376, 11130998, 11130662, 11129949, 11128704, 11124099, 11123564, 11123353, 11123321, 11122783, 11119475, 11119300, 11118604, 11115088, 11113479, 11113371, 11112371, 11111659, 11111057, 11110919, 11110689, 11104075, 11103844, 11103437, 11102715, 11102333, 11100117, 11099313, 11091006, 11089960, 11089798, 11089533, 11088815, 11088718, 11081072, 11079453, 11073644, 11072718, 11065505, 11061598, 11057739, 11056061, 11055766, 1104

Go deeper into Nissan Rogue problems