Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
50–25K
525–50K
950–75K
875–100K
3100–150K
4150K+
34 reports with mileage · 2 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
Vehicle Speed Control. Review the 12 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Power Train. Review the 9 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Electrical System. Review the 6 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
1 crash reports0 fire reports1 injury reports
What owners actually said
36 reports
18,000 miles · Jul 3, 2012
Suspension
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 MERCURY MONTEGO. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE WHEEL BEARING FAILED ON THE FRONT DRIVER SIDE OF THE VEHICLE AND ALSO DAMAGED THE SPINDLE. THE CONTACT WAS REVERSING FROM A RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY WHEN THERE WAS A LOUD BANG SOUND FROM THE FRONT OF THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE REPAIR SHOP WHERE T…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 MERCURY MONTEGO. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE WHEEL BEARING FAILED ON THE FRONT DRIVER SIDE OF THE VEHICLE AND ALSO DAMAGED THE SPINDLE. THE CONTACT WAS REVERSING FROM A RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY WHEN THERE WAS A LOUD BANG SOUND FROM THE FRONT OF THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE REPAIR SHOP WHERE THEY ADVISED THE CONTACT THAT THE WHEEL COULD POTENTIALLY HAVE SEPARATED FROM THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 18,000. . UPDATED 07/27/12 *BF THE CONSUMER HAS THE VEHICLE'S BROKEN PART. UPDATED 08/02/2012 *JS
NHTSA ODI #10464107
155,000 miles · Jun 6, 2012
Vehicle Speed Control
ENGINE SPEED FLUCTUATES SUDDENLY WITH NO OPERATOR INPUT (THROTTLE PEDAL), ESPECIALLY WHEN SHIFTING (AUTOMATIC) TRANSMISSION FROM PARK TO REVERSE OR DRIVE. CAUSES VEHICLE TO LUNGE DURING PARKING MANEUVERS. ALSO REQUIRES ABNORMAL BRAKING INPUT IN TRAFFIC WHEN NORMALLY ENGINE BRAKING WOULD SUFFICE. HAS BEEN SERVICED ONCE BY A FOR…
Read full complaint
ENGINE SPEED FLUCTUATES SUDDENLY WITH NO OPERATOR INPUT (THROTTLE PEDAL), ESPECIALLY WHEN SHIFTING (AUTOMATIC) TRANSMISSION FROM PARK TO REVERSE OR DRIVE. CAUSES VEHICLE TO LUNGE DURING PARKING MANEUVERS. ALSO REQUIRES ABNORMAL BRAKING INPUT IN TRAFFIC WHEN NORMALLY ENGINE BRAKING WOULD SUFFICE. HAS BEEN SERVICED ONCE BY A FORD DEALER (COMPUTER WAS REPROGRAMMED); WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10460738
112,400 miles · Aug 17, 2011
Unknown Or Other
FIRST AT 56K MILES WHEN PUTTING THE CAR INTO REVERSE IT WOULDN'T GO INTO GEAR, UNDER WARRANTY FORD CHANGED THE FLUID SAID NOTHING ELSE WAS WRONG, GOT CAR BACK AND IT STILL DID SAME THING, TOOK BACK TO FORD NOTHING WRONG BUT CAR CONTINUED TO HAVE SAME PROBLEM AND A THE MOTOR NOISE GOT LOUDER. THEN AT 112K CAR WOULDN'T GO INTO GE…
Read full complaint
FIRST AT 56K MILES WHEN PUTTING THE CAR INTO REVERSE IT WOULDN'T GO INTO GEAR, UNDER WARRANTY FORD CHANGED THE FLUID SAID NOTHING ELSE WAS WRONG, GOT CAR BACK AND IT STILL DID SAME THING, TOOK BACK TO FORD NOTHING WRONG BUT CAR CONTINUED TO HAVE SAME PROBLEM AND A THE MOTOR NOISE GOT LOUDER. THEN AT 112K CAR WOULDN'T GO INTO GEAR, HIGH SPEED WAS 10MPH. IT WAS THE CVT TRANSMISSION. CALLED NUMEROUS TRANSMISSION GARAGES NO ONE WORKS ON THEM. FOUND ONE THAT WOULD LOOK AT IT, THEY CONFIRMED IT WAS THE TRANSMISSION, FORD WOULD NOT RELEASE ANY PARTS FOR REBUILDING IT. THEN FORD WOULD NOT RELEASE A REFURBISHED TRANSMISSION FOR IT, THEN THEY CLAIMED THE GARAGES JUST HAD A MISS COMMUNICATIONS. CALLED FORD CUSTOMER SERVICE, THEY SAID CALL BACK IN 48 HRS HAD TO CALL THEM BACK A WK N HALF LATER, JUST TO BE TOLD BY KIM THE SUPERVISOR THAT SHE HOPES I HAVE A NICE DAY. ENDED UP PAYING $6800. TO HAVE MY TRANSMISSION REPLACED WITH A REFURBISHED ONE FROM TENN. HAD TO PAY XTRA SHIPPING. FORD QUIT MAKING THE CVT BECAUSE THEY KNOW THE PROBLEMS THAT IT HAS AND IS NOT STANDING BEHIND THEIR ERROR.
NHTSA ODI #10420448
65,000 miles · Aug 14, 2011
Fuel System, Other
I HAVE A 2007 FORD MERCURY MONTEGO THAT THE THROTTLE HAS A MIND OF ITS OWN-IT OFTEN FLUCTUATES AND I FEEL THAT FORD SHOULD RECALL THIS DEFECT IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SERIOUS ACCIDENTS OCCURS. IT IS AN ON-GOING ISSUE AND HAPPENS DAILY. THERE IS NO WARNING WHEN THE THROTTLE FLUCTUATES-IT IS SOMETHING I MUST BE COGNIZANT ABOUT AT ALL …
Read full complaint
I HAVE A 2007 FORD MERCURY MONTEGO THAT THE THROTTLE HAS A MIND OF ITS OWN-IT OFTEN FLUCTUATES AND I FEEL THAT FORD SHOULD RECALL THIS DEFECT IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SERIOUS ACCIDENTS OCCURS. IT IS AN ON-GOING ISSUE AND HAPPENS DAILY. THERE IS NO WARNING WHEN THE THROTTLE FLUCTUATES-IT IS SOMETHING I MUST BE COGNIZANT ABOUT AT ALL TIMES. I HAVE BEEN TO THE FORD DEALER TO SEE IF THERE HAS BEEN A RECALL AND IF OTHERS HAVE MADE COMPLAINTS ABOUT THIS AS WELL.. THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR SEVERAL MONTHS NOW AND THE LAST INCIDENT WAS YESTERDAY! *TR
NHTSA ODI #10419403
80,000 miles · Jul 15, 2011
Electrical System
WE HAVE HAD INTERMITTENT ELECTRICAL ISSUES FOR SEVERAL YEARS.THE CAR SUDDENLY LOOSES ALL ELECTRICAL POWER. THE BATTERY IS COMPLETELY DEPLETED. ONCE JUMP STARTED THE CAR WILL THEN OPERATE PROPERLY. I HAVE HAD THE ALTERNATOR REPLACED ONCE AND THE CAR HAS BEEN CHECKED BY MECHANICS SEVERAL TIMES, NO ONE CAN FIND THE PROBLEM. WE OFTE…
Read full complaint
WE HAVE HAD INTERMITTENT ELECTRICAL ISSUES FOR SEVERAL YEARS.THE CAR SUDDENLY LOOSES ALL ELECTRICAL POWER. THE BATTERY IS COMPLETELY DEPLETED. ONCE JUMP STARTED THE CAR WILL THEN OPERATE PROPERLY. I HAVE HAD THE ALTERNATOR REPLACED ONCE AND THE CAR HAS BEEN CHECKED BY MECHANICS SEVERAL TIMES, NO ONE CAN FIND THE PROBLEM. WE OFTEN TIMES SMELL A BURNT PLASTIC ODOR JUST BEFORE THE FAILURES. THIS FAILURE HAS HAPPENED DOZENS OF TIME OVER THE PAST 4 YEARS, EVEN DURING WARRANTY. FORD DID NOTHING FOR US. *TT
NHTSA ODI #10413082
50,000 miles · Jul 13, 2011
Fuel System, Gasoline
SUDDEN ACCELERATION WHEN TAKING OFF AND BACKING UP. ESPECIALLY INTO REVERSE. THERE HAS BEEN A FEW CLOSE CALLS BECAUSE OF THIS. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10412170
83,500 miles · May 20, 2011
Vehicle Speed Control
I HAVE EXPERIENCED A SUDDEN UNEXPECTED LUNGE WHEN BACKING OUT OF A PARKING SPACE AFTER PLACING THE VEHICLE IN REVERSE ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS. YOU CAN HEAR THE ENGINE RPM INCREASE QUICKLY, THEN DECREASE JUST AS QUICKLY WHEN THIS HAPPENS. THIS TYPICALLY OCCURS WHEN THE VEHICLE IS PLACED IN REVERSE AND THE WHEEL IS BEING TURNED AND…
Read full complaint
I HAVE EXPERIENCED A SUDDEN UNEXPECTED LUNGE WHEN BACKING OUT OF A PARKING SPACE AFTER PLACING THE VEHICLE IN REVERSE ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS. YOU CAN HEAR THE ENGINE RPM INCREASE QUICKLY, THEN DECREASE JUST AS QUICKLY WHEN THIS HAPPENS. THIS TYPICALLY OCCURS WHEN THE VEHICLE IS PLACED IN REVERSE AND THE WHEEL IS BEING TURNED AND THE MY FOOT IS ON THE BRAKE PEDAL. IT HAS ALSO OCCURRED AGAIN WHEN THE VEHICLE IS PUT INTO DRIVE AFTER GOING FROM REVERSE AND THE WHEEL IS TURNED. HAVING THE BRAKE PEDAL DEPRESSED, IS EFFECTIVE IN STOPPING THE VEHICLE, BUT SINCE THE TIMING AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE MALFUNCTION IS UNPREDICTABLE, IT HAS BECOME A NOTICEABLE AND CONSTANT ISSUE. I THOUGHT MY VEHICLE WAS AN ISOLATED ISSUE, BUT IT APPEARS TO BE MORE WIDESPREAD. AFTER SEEING THIS ISSUE ON ONLINE DISCUSSION BOARDS FOR FORD FIVE HUNDRED/MONTEGO/FREESTYLE VEHICLES AND NOW THE 2005-2007 FORD FREESTYLE INVESTIGATION, I WOULD STRONGLY URGE NHTSA TO EXPAND THIS INVESTIGATION TO INCLUDE 2005-2007 FORD FIVE HUNDRED/MERCURY MONTEGO SINCE THESE VEHICLE USE SIMILAR DRIVETRAIN COMPONENTS. THE SYMPTOMS I HAVE SEEN ARE EXACTLY THE SAME AS THOSE DESCRIBED IN THE INVESTIGATION OF THE FORD FREESTYLE IN INVESTIGATION PE 11-018 OPENED ON 5/11/2011
NHTSA ODI #10403179
Mileage unknown · Mar 12, 2011
Power Train
NEED YOU TO LOOK AT THE TRANSMISSION OF THE 2007 MERCURY MONTEGO.... THE OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF THE VEHICLE IS GREAT.. I HAD OTHERS INQUIRE ABOUT MY TRANSMISSION... SLIPPING. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10389916
86,847 miles · Nov 3, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 MERCURY MONTEGO. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE THROTTLE BODY CONTROL FAILED TWICE. WHEN THE FAILURE OCCURRED THE VEHICLE WOULD ACCELERATE WHEN HE REMOVED HIS FOOT OFF OF THE BRAKE PEDAL AND BEFORE HE PLACED HIS FOOT BACK ON IT. THE THROTTLE BODY WAS REPLACED TWICE IN THE PAST 15 MONTHS. THE FAILURE MILEA…
Read full complaint
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 MERCURY MONTEGO. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE THROTTLE BODY CONTROL FAILED TWICE. WHEN THE FAILURE OCCURRED THE VEHICLE WOULD ACCELERATE WHEN HE REMOVED HIS FOOT OFF OF THE BRAKE PEDAL AND BEFORE HE PLACED HIS FOOT BACK ON IT. THE THROTTLE BODY WAS REPLACED TWICE IN THE PAST 15 MONTHS. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 86847. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 109847. UPDATED 01/20/11 *BF UPDATED 04/13/11
NHTSA ODI #10363911
40,000 miles · Sep 27, 2010
Power Train
2007 MERCURY MONTEGO SURGES IN BOTH FORWARD AND BACKWARD MODE. IT IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS AND DOES THIS UNEXPECTEDLY. IS THIS GOING TO BE A TOYOTA TYPE PROBLEM WHERE IT WILL TAKE A SERIOUS ACCIDENT TO GET THESE CARS RECALLED ? THIS IS AN ONGOING PROBLEM WITH THE ELECTRONIC THROTTLE BODY WHICH MANY PEOPLE HAVE REPORTED AND IT SE…
Read full complaint
2007 MERCURY MONTEGO SURGES IN BOTH FORWARD AND BACKWARD MODE. IT IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS AND DOES THIS UNEXPECTEDLY. IS THIS GOING TO BE A TOYOTA TYPE PROBLEM WHERE IT WILL TAKE A SERIOUS ACCIDENT TO GET THESE CARS RECALLED ? THIS IS AN ONGOING PROBLEM WITH THE ELECTRONIC THROTTLE BODY WHICH MANY PEOPLE HAVE REPORTED AND IT SEEMS FORD MOTOR COMPANY WISHES TO IGNORE INSTEAD OF ADDRESS. THIS IS TRULY A SHAME BECAUSE WE WERE SO PROUD OF AN AMERICAN AUTO COMPANY WHO REFUSED TO TAKE THE GOVERNMENT BAIL OUT , BUT AT THE SAME TIME, THEY NEED TO STEP UP AND STAND BEHIND A REAL PROBLEM WITH THEIR VEHICLE. *TR
FORD IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2007 FORD FIVE HUNDRED AND MERCURY MONTEGO VEHICLES MANUFACTURED FROM SEPTEMBER 5, 2006, THROUGH SEPTEMBER 11, 2006. THE FUEL TANKS MAY NOT HAVE CONSISTENT WELDS BETWEEN THE FUEL TANK AND FUEL FILLER NECK SPUD WHICH CAN AFFECT THE STRENGTH OF THE JOINT. SOME FUEL TANK SPUD WELDS MAY NOT PROVIDE THE EXPECTED STRENGTH IN THE EVENT OF A SEVERE REAR IMPACT TO THE VEHICLE. AN IMPROPER WELD CAN RESULT IN A CRACK IN THE JOINT WHICH COULD ILLUMINATE THE EMISSIONS MALFUNCTION INDICATOR LIGHT, CAUSE A FUEL ODOR, OR ALLOW FUEL TO LEAK OUT.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: FUEL LEAKAGE, IN THE PRESENCE OF AN IGNITION SOURCE, COULD RESULT IN A FIRE.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE FUEL TANK FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON AUGUST 16, 2011. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD MOTOR COMPANY CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP CENTER AT 1-866-436-7332.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
2
PE11018 · Idle Instability
Opened May 11, 2011 · Closed Feb 7, 2013
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Vehicle Speed Control
On November 29, 2012, Ford Motor Company (Ford) initiated Customer Satisfaction Program 12N03 to extend warranty coverage terms for repair of engine idle RPM surge caused by throttle body deposits in all model year (MY) 2005 through 2007 Ford Freestyle, Five Hundred and Mercury Montego vehicles.The program extends the coverage for up to 10 years of service or 150,000 miles from the warranty start date of the vehicle (all vehicles are eligible for the program through May 31, 2013, regardless of mileage).Dealers will repair vehicles exhibiting the condition by removing and cleaning the throttle body and reprogramming the PCM with software containing an updated idle speed control strategy.According to Ford, some of the affected vehicles may experience momentary, intermittent engine idle RPM surge (idle flare) when stopped or during low speed driving maneuvers such as in a parking lot or driveway.Unstable idle speed control (dips and flares) around the target engine speed (700 rpm) can occur in vehicles with deposit build-up in the throttle body when the system adjusts engine speed in response to changes in engine load, typically from power steering application or air-conditioner compressor cycling.Idle speed control logic is only active at vehicle speeds below 3.5 mph and when the accelerator pedal is not applied.Ford testing of a vehicle with a worst case throttle body measured a maximum idle flare of 1360 RPM lasting approximately 1 second, which Ford indicated was consistent with system design to limit vehicle speed and acceleration in idle control mode.Ford indicated that the test vehicle was held in place with normal brake effort and that vehicle speed remained under 4 mph without the brake pedal applied.In addition to throttle body deposit accumulation, symptoms associated with the condition may include Check Engine lamp illumination and diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs) P0505, P0506 or P061B.Ford attributed the surge condition to changes in idle air flow resulting from the progressive buildup of deposits in the throttle body from normal Positive Crankcase Ventilation (PCV) system operation.This condition was not adequately compensated for in the original Powertrain Control Module (PCM) calibration.Ford issued a technical service bulletin on August 15, 2011 (TSB 11-8-5), releasing an updated powertrain control calibration for vehicles with CVT transmissions.On October 19, 2011, Ford issued a second bulletin (TSB 11-10-21) superseding TSB 11-8-5 and including updated powertrain control calibration for vehicles with 6-speed transmissions.Prior to Ford issuing the TSB?s, owner?s experiencing the alleged defect either received no repairs, if dealers could not duplicate the condition, or had the throttle body cleaned or replaced, which only provided temporary correction until the throttle deposit build-up returned.Ford?s revised powertrain calibrations appear to be effective remedies for the idle instability caused by build-up of throttle body deposits.However, even after the TSB?s were released, many owners experiencing the condition continued to have difficulty with proper diagnosis and repair as dealers were often either unable to duplicate the condition or were unfamiliar with the new repair procedures.Ford's new program addresses those concerns.NHTSA's testing and complaint analysis indicate that the idle speed control issue in the subject vehicles can only occur at very low speeds, are very brief events, are easily controlled by moderate brake pedal forces and result in minor increases in vehicle speed even with no braking.This investigation is closed.The closing of this in
PE08060 · Tire Valve Cracking
Opened Oct 14, 2008 · Closed Apr 9, 2009
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Tires:valve
ON OCTOBER 14, 2008, ODI OPENED PE08-060 TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF CRACKED AND LEAKING SNAP-IN TIRE VALVES IN MODEL YEAR (MY) 2007 VEHICLES MANUFACTURED BY FORD MOTOR COMPANY.THE VALVES WERE SUPPLIED TO FORD BY TOPSEAL AUTO-PARTS, A SUBSIDIARY OF THE SHANGHAI BAOLONG AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION IN CHINA.VALVES MADE BY TOPSEAL FOR AFTERMARKET SALE WERE THE SUBJECT OF TWO RECENT SAFETY RECALLS BY TECH INTERNATIONAL (08T-018) AND DILL AIR CONTROLS (08T-028), THE LATTER OF WHICH WAS INVESTIGATED BY ODI IN PE08-036 AND EA08-022.THE DEFECT CONDITIONS ADDRESSED BY THE AFTERMARKET TIRE VALVE RECALLS BOTH INVOLVED INADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO OZONE CRACKING DUE TO ISSUES WITH THE SUPPLY OF ANTI-OZONANT CHEMICALS TO TOPSEAL FOR A PERIOD FROM JULY TO MID-NOVEMBER 2006.THE AFTERMARKET VALVES WERE COMPOUNDED WITH A BLEND OF EPDM AND NATURAL RUBBER, USING A RELATIVELY LOW PERCENTAGE OF EPDM (EPDM PROVIDES INHERENT RESISTANCE TO OZONE CRACKING).HENCE, THE NEED FOR ANTI-OZONANT CHEMICALS AND THE PROBLEMS WITH CRACKING WHEN THOSE CHEMICALS WERE MISSING OR OUT OF SPECIFICATION IN SOME LOTS OF VALVES.BOTH RECALL CAMPAIGNS INVOLVED INSPECTION PROGRAMS TO IDENTIFY AND REPLACE VALVES WITH VISIBLE SURFACE CRACKING.ALTHOUGH THE TOPSEAL VALVES SUPPLIED TO FORD ALSO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN AFFECTED BY THE ANTI-OZONANT SUPPLY ISSUES IN MID TO LATE-2006, FORD INDICATED THAT ITS VALVES WERE MADE AT A DIFFERENT TOPSEAL PRODUCTION LINE AND WERE COMPOUNDED WITH A HIGHER PERCENTAGE OF EPDM RUBBER TO MEET MORE STRINGENT SPECIFICATIONS FROM FORD.ODI'S ANALYSIS OF COMPLAINT AND WARRANTY DATA PROVIDED BY FORD SHOWED THAT PROBLEMS WITH CRACKED TIRE VALVES WERE SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER FOR MY 2007 VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM DECEMBER 2006 THROUGH MARCH 2007.FORD RESPONDED BY IMPLEMENTING CHANGES IN ITS MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR SNAP-IN RUBBER TIRE VALVES AND ALSO INCREASING THE QUALITY AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS FOR VALVES IMPORTED FOR USE IN ITS VEHICLES.WHILE THE COMPLAINT AND WARRANTY CLAIM RATES ARE ELEVATED FOR SUBJECT VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM DECEMBER 2006 THROUGH MARCH 2007, THE RATES OF LEAKING VALVES ARE WELL BELOW ONE PERCENT OF PRODUCTION FOR EACH OF THE PEAK MONTHS FOR ALL OF THE AFFECTED MODELS.A SUBSTANTIAL MAJORITY OF THE SUBJECT VEHICLES ARE EQUIPPED WITH TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEMS (TPMS) WHICH WARN THE DRIVER WHEN ANY TIRE PRESSURES DROPS BELOW 25 PERCENT OF RECOMMENDED INFLATION PRESSURE. AS OUTLINED IN A LETTER TO ODI DATED APRIL 6, 2009, FORD HAS AGREED TO SEND LETTERS TO OWNERS OF CERTAIN MY 2007 AND 2008 FORD, LINCOLN AND MERCURY VEHICLES TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CRACKING CONCERN. LETTERS WILL BE SENT TO OWNERS OF VEHICLES BUILT FROM NOVEMBER 2006 THROUGH MAY 2007.OWNERS CAN OPT FOR A FREE DEALER INSPECTION.VALVES EXHIBITING SURFACE CRACKS OR AIR LEAKAGE RELATED TO OZONE ATTACK WILL BE REPLACED BY FORD UNDER ITS NORMAL WARRANTY TERMS.FORD EXPECTS TO SEND THE LETTER BY APPROXIMATELY MID-MAY 2009. BASED ON THE USE OF TPMS IN THE MAJORITY OF SUBJECT VEHICLES AND THE RELATIVELY LOW RATES OF REPAIRS ASSOCIATED WITH LEAKING VALVES AND RESULTANT TIRE DAMAGE, ODI BELIEVES THAT THE ACTIONS FORD HAS AGREED TO TAKE WILL PROVIDE EFFECTIVE AND EXPEDITIOUS RESOLUTION FOR VEHICLES THAT WERE BUILT DURING THE PERIOD WHEN VALVES WITH INADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO OZONE CRACKING WERE MOST LIKELY TO HAVE BEEN USED IN VEHICLE PRODUCTION.FURTHER INVESTIGATION OF THIS MATTER WOULD NOT BE AN EFFICIENT ALLOCATION OF AGENCY RESOURCES.ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT A SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT DOES NOT EXIST.THE AGENCY WILL CONTINUE TO
2007 Mercury Montego Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year