Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
20–25K
825–50K
1750–75K
1075–100K
11100–150K
3150K+
51 reports with mileage · 42 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
Air Bags. Review the 40 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Seat Belts. Review the 18 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Electrical System. Review the 17 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
1 crash reports6 fire reports3 injury reports
What owners actually said
93 reports
72,000 miles · Jul 9, 2015
Fuel/propulsion System
WEEK OF JUNE 27TH, I STARTED TO NOTE GAS FUMES COMING FROM MY VEHICLE. GIVEN, I HAD RECENTLY FILLED UP ON GAS TANK, THOUGHT IT WAS DUE TO "BURN OFF"... ON JULY 2ND, TOOK MY VEHICLE IN FOR OIL CHANGE AND THEY NOTED THAT THEY COULD DETECT GAS FUMES COMING FROM UNDER MY VEHICLE AND ADVISED TO TAKE IT TO DEALERSHIP IN ASAP... SAME D…
Read full complaint
WEEK OF JUNE 27TH, I STARTED TO NOTE GAS FUMES COMING FROM MY VEHICLE. GIVEN, I HAD RECENTLY FILLED UP ON GAS TANK, THOUGHT IT WAS DUE TO "BURN OFF"... ON JULY 2ND, TOOK MY VEHICLE IN FOR OIL CHANGE AND THEY NOTED THAT THEY COULD DETECT GAS FUMES COMING FROM UNDER MY VEHICLE AND ADVISED TO TAKE IT TO DEALERSHIP IN ASAP... SAME DAY, TOOK IT TO DEALERSHIP AND AFTER A FULL INSPECTION OF MY VEHICLE, THEY ADVISED ME THE FUEL SENDING UNIT WAS BRAKING DOWN AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THEY ADVISED THIS WAS SO INCREDIBLY RARE AND SHOULD NOT HAVE OCCURRED. DRIVING MY VEHICLE WAS A HAZARD AND COULD HAVE EXPLODED. GIVEN THIS IS MY MAIN VEHICLE FOR ME AND MY SON, THIS IS VERY CONCERNING TO ME!!! AND NOTHING SHOULD BE BRAKING DOWN AT 70,000 MILES... MY EXTENDED WARRANTY DID NOT COVER IT AND IT COST ME $2000 TO HAVE IT REPAIRED. AGAIN, NO ONE CAN ADVISE HOW THIS OCCURRED BUT NO ONE I HAVE SPOKEN TO CAN GIVE ME A REASON BUT NOTHING SHOULD BE DETERIORATING ON A LUXURY VEHICLE.
NHTSA ODI #10733001
Mileage unknown · May 7, 2015
Fuel/propulsion System
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCEDES BENZ ML350. AFTER REFUELING THE VEHICLE, FUEL FUMES EMITTED IN AND AROUND THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE ALSO STALLED AFTER THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO THE DEALER. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS UNKNOWN.
NHTSA ODI #10715118
48,000 miles · May 5, 2015
Seat Belts
REAR SEAT BELTS ARE LOOSE, SEAT BELTS DON'T HOLD AND DON'T GO BACK. ON BOTH SIDES IN REAR. SEAT BELTS STAYS LOOSE. THIS IS A DEFECT. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10714711
54,000 miles · May 5, 2015
Electrical System
INSTRUMENT CLUSTER HAS AN ORANGE LEAK INSIDE, DEALER SAID THAT THEY NEVER SAW SOMEHING LIKE IT BEFORE. NEED TO BE REPLACED, THE CHARGE IS ABOUT $2000. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10714709
68,822 miles · Feb 2, 2015
Seat Belts
I HAD A PASSENGER IN THE REAR OF MY VEHICLE AND SHE TOLD ME THE SEAT BELTS DID NOT WORK. THE REAR PASSENGER BELT WOULD NOT RETRACT. WHEN I STOPPED THE VEHICLE WE CHECKED BOTH SIDES AND NEITHER REAR BELTS ARE WORKING. THEY ARE ALL OUT OF THE CONTAINMENT SYSTEM AND LOCKED. THEY WILL NOT RETRACT AND THEREFORE CANNOT BE USED. …
Read full complaint
I HAD A PASSENGER IN THE REAR OF MY VEHICLE AND SHE TOLD ME THE SEAT BELTS DID NOT WORK. THE REAR PASSENGER BELT WOULD NOT RETRACT. WHEN I STOPPED THE VEHICLE WE CHECKED BOTH SIDES AND NEITHER REAR BELTS ARE WORKING. THEY ARE ALL OUT OF THE CONTAINMENT SYSTEM AND LOCKED. THEY WILL NOT RETRACT AND THEREFORE CANNOT BE USED. I CONTACTED MB USA TO FIND OUT IF THERE IS A RECALL FOR THE SEAT BELTS AFTER I WENT ONLINE AND FOUND OUT THAT THIS IS A VERY COMMON PROBLEM WITH THEIR VEHICLES. THEY TOLD ME THERE IS NO RECALL AND THEY REFERRED ME BACK TO THE DEALERSHIP. I AM ABOUT TO CALL THE DEALERSHIP, BUT I SUSPECT THAT WHAT I READ ONLINE IS TRUE. THEY ARE PASSING ON A DEFECTIVE SEAT BELT TO THE CONSUMER TO REPAIR JUST AS I READ ONLINE. I AM FILING THIS COMPLAINT IN THE HOPE THAT YOU WILL INVESTIGATE MB FOR THIS ISSUE. I HAVE BEEN A LONG-TIME CUSTOMER OF MB, BUT THIS MAY JUST CHANGE MY MIND. *TR
AUTO WAS IN FORWARD AN AT COMPLETE STOP AND DRIVER PLACED IN PARK BUT LEFT ENGINE RUNNING AND EXITED THE CAR. CAR WENT INTO REVERSE AND STARTED TO ACCELERATE. DRIVER WAS KNOCKED TO THE GROUND AND RUN OVER BY CAR. CAR WAS STOPPED WHEN IT RAN INTO BUILDING STRUCTURE. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10676860
60,000 miles · Oct 12, 2014
Seat Belts
REAR SEATBELT WILL NOT RETRACT. MILEAGE IS PAST WARRANTY COVERAGE & FIX IS VERY PRICEY (APPROX $800). THIS IS A MAJOR SAFETY ISSUE ESPECIALLY WITH PASSENGERS, MOSTLY CHILDREN, IN THE BACK. I GOOGLED THIS & IT SEEMS I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS THIS ISSUE. IT IS WIDE SPREAD & A FAULT OF THE MANUFACTURER. MERCEDES SHOULD BE REQUI…
Read full complaint
REAR SEATBELT WILL NOT RETRACT. MILEAGE IS PAST WARRANTY COVERAGE & FIX IS VERY PRICEY (APPROX $800). THIS IS A MAJOR SAFETY ISSUE ESPECIALLY WITH PASSENGERS, MOSTLY CHILDREN, IN THE BACK. I GOOGLED THIS & IT SEEMS I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS THIS ISSUE. IT IS WIDE SPREAD & A FAULT OF THE MANUFACTURER. MERCEDES SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO FIX THIS FREE OF CHARGE! PLEASE HELP. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10644186
63,000 miles · Oct 9, 2014
Structure
THE AUTOMATIC REAR HATCH CLOSED BUT DID NOT LOCK. DURING ACCELERATION THE REAR HATCH STARTED TO OPEN. ANY FURTHER ATTEMPTS TO LOCK THE HATCH WERE UNSUCCESSFUL AND THE REAR HATCH COULD NOT BE LOCKED. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10643659
Mileage unknown · Apr 28, 2014
Seat Belts
REAR SEAT BELTS ON BOTH SIDES DO NOT RETRACT. THEY HAVE NOT WORKED SINCE WE PURCHASED THE CAR. ALTHOUGH I HAVE FOUND NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS ONLINE OF THIS PROBLEM, WITH THIS MAKE AND MODEL, I HAVE NOT YET FOUND A RECALL. PLEASE CONSIDER AN INVESTIGATION ON THIS ISSUE. AS OUR CHILDREN ARE ALMOST ALWAYS THE ONES IN THE BACK SEAT,…
Read full complaint
REAR SEAT BELTS ON BOTH SIDES DO NOT RETRACT. THEY HAVE NOT WORKED SINCE WE PURCHASED THE CAR. ALTHOUGH I HAVE FOUND NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS ONLINE OF THIS PROBLEM, WITH THIS MAKE AND MODEL, I HAVE NOT YET FOUND A RECALL. PLEASE CONSIDER AN INVESTIGATION ON THIS ISSUE. AS OUR CHILDREN ARE ALMOST ALWAYS THE ONES IN THE BACK SEAT, IT IS THEIR LIVES AT RISK FROM THIS FAULTY EQUIPMENT. *JS
NHTSA ODI #10585301
59,000 miles · Apr 14, 2014
Seat Belts
THE REAR PASSENGER AND MIDDLE PASSENGER SEAT BELTS BOTH WENT SLACK. NOT DUE TO ANY MISUSE. CERTIFIED PREOWNED WARRANTY EXPIRED OCTOBER 31, 2013. MERCEDES COVERED COST OF PARTS, I PICKED UP COST OF LABOR. *JS
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA) is recalling certain 2006-2012 ML, GL, and R-Class vehicles. Please refer to MBUSA's recall report for specific vehicle model details. Moisture may accumulate and cause corrosion in the brake booster housing unit, which can result in reduced brake performance or brake failure.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: Reduced brake performance or brake failure can increase the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Owners are advised not to drive their vehicles until the remedy has been performed. Dealers will remove the rubber sleeve, inspect the brake booster, and as necessary, replace the brake booster. All repairs will be performed free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed on May 24, 2024. Owners may contact MBUSA customer service at 1-800-367-6372. MMUSA's number for this recall is 2024050001/2. This recall is an expansion of previous recall number 22V-315.
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA) is recalling certain 2006-2012 ML-Class, GL-Class, and R-Class vehicles. Please refer to MBUSA's recall report for specific vehicle model details. Moisture may accumulate and cause corrosion in the brake booster housing unit, which can result in reduced brake performance or brake failure.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: Reduced brake performance or brake failure can increase the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Owners are advised not to drive their vehicles until the remedy has been performed. Dealers will remove the rubber sleeve, inspect the brake booster, and as necessary, replace the brake booster. All repairs will be performed free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed June 30, 2022. Owners may contact MBUSA customer service at 1-800-367-6372. MBUSA's numbers for this recall are 2022050014, 2022050015 2022090006, & 2022090007.
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (MBUSA) is recalling certain model year 2009-2010 ML320 BlueTec 4Matic, GL320 BlueTec 4Matic and R320 CDI 4Matic, 2011 E350 Cabriolet and E550 Cabriolet, 2009-2011 ML350, ML350 4Matic, ML550 4Matic, ML63 AMG, and C63 AMG, 2010-2011 ML450 4Matic Hybrid, E350 Coupe, E350 4Matic, E550 Coupe, E550 4Matic, and E63 AMG, 2011-2012 GL350 BlueTec 4Matic and R350 BlueTec 4Matic, 2009-2012 GL450 4Matic, GL550 4Matic and R350 4Matic, 2007-2008 SLK280, SLK350, and SLK55 AMG, 2011-2014 SLS AMG Coupe, 2012 SLS AMG Cabriolet, 2013-2014 SLS AMG GT and SLS AMG GT Cabriolet, 2005 C230 Kompressor and C320, 2006-2007 C230, 2006-2011 C350, 2008-2011 C300 and C300 4Matic, 2010-2012 GLK350 and GLK350 4Matic and 2007-2008 Chrysler Crossfire vehicles. Upon deployment of the driver's frontal air bag, excessive internal pressure may cause the inflator to rupture.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the driver's frontal air bag, the inflator could rupture with metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.
Remedy: MBUSA will their notify owners, and Fiat Chrysler will notify the affected Chrysler owners. Dealers for the respective brands will replace the driver's frontal air bag module, free of charge. This recall began November 2016. Mercedes-Benz owners may contact MBUSA customer service at 1-800-367-6372 and Chrysler owners may contact Fiat Chrysler customer service at 1-800-853-1403.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
1
EA21002 · Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture
Opened Sep 17, 2021 · No close date supplied
Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module; Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module
From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module
From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.
Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module
From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.
2009 Mercedes Benz ML350 Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year