← New search

2015 Mercedes Benz B-CLASS Electric

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all B-CLASS Electric years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

Limited mileage data: 18 of 25 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Power Train. Review the 14 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Fuel/propulsion System. Review the 10 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Engine. Review the 7 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

0 crash reports0 fire reports0 injury reports

Fuel/propulsion System complaints

10 reports
Clear category filter
Mileage unknown · May 2, 2023
Electrical SystemFuel/propulsion System

The electric motor was leaking coolant and needs to be replaced. I have read countless accounts that this is a known issue with this car.

NHTSA ODI #11520040

Mileage unknown · Jun 14, 2022
Electrical SystemEngineFuel/propulsion System

The main electric drive motor will start leaking coolant which then damages the motor and even electronics. Well known issue and makes the vehicle unsafe and isn't a matter of "if" but "when" the seals will go bad and this is on our car that has less than 40k miles on the odometer.

NHTSA ODI #11469255

1,600 miles · Oct 11, 2015
EngineFuel/propulsion SystemPower Train

MY B-CLASS ELECTRIC HAD A SUDDEN LOSS OF POWER. HERE'S THE DETAILS: LEFT THE HOUSE IN SAN DIEGO AT 7:00 AM. OUTSIDE TEMPERATURE ABOUT 75+DEGREES. ABOUT 1 MILE FROM THE START, I BRAKED SLIGHTLY TO MAINTAIN SPEED OF ABOUT 25 MPH, COASTED TOWARDS AND UPHILL, PUT MY FOOT ON THE ACCELERATOR TO MAINTAIN SPEED AND THERE WAS NO P…

Read full complaint

MY B-CLASS ELECTRIC HAD A SUDDEN LOSS OF POWER. HERE'S THE DETAILS: LEFT THE HOUSE IN SAN DIEGO AT 7:00 AM. OUTSIDE TEMPERATURE ABOUT 75+DEGREES. ABOUT 1 MILE FROM THE START, I BRAKED SLIGHTLY TO MAINTAIN SPEED OF ABOUT 25 MPH, COASTED TOWARDS AND UPHILL, PUT MY FOOT ON THE ACCELERATOR TO MAINTAIN SPEED AND THERE WAS NO POWER-JUST COASTING. THERE WAS NO UNUSUAL SOUND AND NO WARNING DISPLAYED. THE CAR APPEARED NORMAL EXCEPT THE GUAGE WAS SHOWING FULL REGENERATIVE BRAKING WHILE THE CAR WAS COASTING. TRANSMISSION WAS IN D-AUTO. POWER STEERING WORKED, AC AND RADIO WERE STILL ON. I BROUGHT IT TO A STOP. PUSHED THE BUTTON TO TURN IT OFF. AT THAT TIME ALL THE LIGHTS ON THE DASH LIT UP. I PUSHED IT AGAIN AND THE CAR WAS BACK TO NORMAL WITH THE INDICATOR SHOWING ZERO BETWEEN REGENERATION AND DISCHARGE. I FINISHED THE DRIVE WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. MILEAGE: 1620 MILES PURCHASED: JUNE 2015 MFG DATE: 4/15 TOOK THE CAR TO THE DEALER TWO HOURS LATER AND TOLD THEM ABOUT THE PROBLEM AND THAT THE FORUM SAYS THERE IS A CODE UPDATE AVAILABLE. WAITED THERE FOR 3 HOURS. THEIR PAPER WORK SAYS: 1639 541011, 540991, 540992. PROGRAMMED POWER TRAIN CONTROL UNIT. PERFORMED SHORT TEST; NO RELEVANT FAULT CODES. CHECKED POWER TRAIN CONTROL UNIT FOR SOFTWARE UPDATES. UPDATE WAS AVAILABLE. PROGRAMMED AND CODED POWER TRAIN CONTROL UNIT. COMPLETE.

NHTSA ODI #10781331

1,280 miles · Oct 1, 2015
Fuel/propulsion SystemPower TrainVehicle Speed Control

DRIVING ON THE FREEWAY AT 65MPH, EXPERIENCED COMPLETE AND SUDDEN LOSS OF DRIVE/POWER. CAR CHARGE WAS AROUND 1/2 FULL. HAD TO PULL TO THE SHOULDER AS THE CAR ROLLED TO A COMPLETE STOP. FINDING LOTS OF OTHER REPORTS ONLINE, DEALER HAS BEEN UNABLE TO DETERMINE THE ROOT CAUSE AFTER 1 WEEK. DEALER REPORTED OTHER SIMILAR INCIDENTS…

Read full complaint

DRIVING ON THE FREEWAY AT 65MPH, EXPERIENCED COMPLETE AND SUDDEN LOSS OF DRIVE/POWER. CAR CHARGE WAS AROUND 1/2 FULL. HAD TO PULL TO THE SHOULDER AS THE CAR ROLLED TO A COMPLETE STOP. FINDING LOTS OF OTHER REPORTS ONLINE, DEALER HAS BEEN UNABLE TO DETERMINE THE ROOT CAUSE AFTER 1 WEEK. DEALER REPORTED OTHER SIMILAR INCIDENTS FROM OTHER DRIVERS.

NHTSA ODI #10778913

1,000 miles · Sep 21, 2015
Fuel/propulsion SystemPower Train

I WAS DRIVING ON THE 91 FREEWAY IN ANAHEIM CA WHEN MY BRAND NEW (APPROXIMATELY 1000 MILES ON THE ODOMETER) 2015 MB ALL ELECTRIC AUTOMOBILE BEGAN TO DECELERATE. MY FOOT WAS ON THE ACCELERATOR AS I LOST ALL POWER TO THE ENGINE. THE BATTERY WAS FULLY CHARGED. THE RADIO AND ALL OF THE ELECTRONIC INTERIOR FEATURES WERE INTACT. I WAS…

Read full complaint

I WAS DRIVING ON THE 91 FREEWAY IN ANAHEIM CA WHEN MY BRAND NEW (APPROXIMATELY 1000 MILES ON THE ODOMETER) 2015 MB ALL ELECTRIC AUTOMOBILE BEGAN TO DECELERATE. MY FOOT WAS ON THE ACCELERATOR AS I LOST ALL POWER TO THE ENGINE. THE BATTERY WAS FULLY CHARGED. THE RADIO AND ALL OF THE ELECTRONIC INTERIOR FEATURES WERE INTACT. I WAS IN THE 3RD LANE OF TRAFFIC (OUT OF 5). LUCKILY THE TRAFFIC WAS LIGHT AS I PULLED OVER TO THE SIDE OF THE FREEWAY AND THE CAR CAME TO A COMPLETE STOP. I WAS QUITE UNNERVED BY THE INCIDENT BUT THE CAR STARTED UP AND I CONTINUED MY COMMUTE TO WORK UNEVENTFULLY. I TOOK MY VEHICLE TO THE MERCEDES DEALERSHIP AND THEY EVALUATED THE CAR. THEY COULD NOT REPLICATE THE EVENT AND COULD NOT FIND AN ANOMALY IN THE ON BOARD COMPUTERS. I PRESENTED TESTIMONY FROM THIS VERY WEBSITE DISCLOSING 7 OTHER RECENT SIMILAR EVENTS IN THIS MODEL CAR. I ADVISED THE DEALERSHIP THAT I WAS NOT TAKING POSSESSION OF THE AUTO UNLESS SOMETHING WAS DONE. THEY PRESENTED THE INFORMATION TO MERCEDES BENZ/TESLA TECHNICAL SUPPORT. THE GATEWAY POWERTRAIN CONTROL UNIT WAS REPLACED. I EXPRESSED MY CONCERN TO THE MB DEALERSHIP THAT THIS MAYBE A SYSTEMIC PROBLEM, GIVEN THE NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS IN SUCH A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME. THE DEALERSHIP REPRESENTATIVE EXPRESSED SYMPATHY WITH MY SITUATION BUT DECLARED THAT THIS IS SOMETHING WE SHOULD TAKE UP WITH DAIMLER-BENZ. THE DEALERSHIP IS A SEPARATE ENTITY WHICH ONLY BUYS/SELLS AND PROVIDES MAINTENANCE FOR MB AUTOMOBILES. I EXPRESSED THAT THIS DEFECT HAS ME CONCERNED EVERY TIME I ENTER A FREEWAY. THE SERVICE MANAGER COULD NOT REASSURE ME THAT THIS WILL NOT HAPPEN AGAIN. I HOPE IT DOES NOT TAKE FATALITIES BEFORE THERE IS A RECALL.

NHTSA ODI #10766546

3,000 miles · Sep 16, 2015
Fuel/propulsion System

THERE HAS BEEN TWO INCIDENT, IN WHICH I AM DRIVING THE CAR AND THE ACCELERATOR DOES NOT RESPOND, REQUIRING ME TO MAKE AN EMERGENCY LANE CHANGE TO GET OFF THE ROAD, THESE SITUATION HAVE BEEN VERY FRIGHTENING AND I FEAR FOR MY LIFE DRIVING SUCH A CAR. THE FIRST SITUATION OCCURRED AUGUST 2015 , WHILE TRAVELING ON A HIGH WAY AT …

Read full complaint

THERE HAS BEEN TWO INCIDENT, IN WHICH I AM DRIVING THE CAR AND THE ACCELERATOR DOES NOT RESPOND, REQUIRING ME TO MAKE AN EMERGENCY LANE CHANGE TO GET OFF THE ROAD, THESE SITUATION HAVE BEEN VERY FRIGHTENING AND I FEAR FOR MY LIFE DRIVING SUCH A CAR. THE FIRST SITUATION OCCURRED AUGUST 2015 , WHILE TRAVELING ON A HIGH WAY AT 65MPH. THE CAR STOP ACCELERATED AND I LUCKLY MADE AN EMERGENCY LANE CHANGE WITHOUT HARM MYSELF, FAMILY CAR OR ANYONE ELSE. I IMMEDIATELY CONTACTED SOS ON MY CAR AND WAS TOLD THE CAR WAS SAFE TO DRIVE, AFTER I RESTARTED IT. I TOOK MY CAR IN FOR A REPAIR, THEY DID A SOFTWARE UPDATE AN PROMISED IT WONT HAPPEN AGAIN. OCCURRED AT 1500 MILES, ROUGHLY 2 MONTH AFTER PURCHASING THE CAR. 1500 MILES LATER, ABOUT 7 WEEKS, IT HAPPENS AGAIN. THIS TIME ON A SMALL ROAD, I ALSO HAVE VIDEO OF THE, CAR WHERE I AM NOT ABLE TO PUT THE CAR INTO DRIVE AND IT IS STUCK IN NEUTRAL BUT CAN GO INTO REVERSE/DRIVE. THE REGENERATION WAS AT 100% AND ALL WARNING LIGHT ON, SAME THING AS FIRST TIME. NOTE I STILL HAVE THE VIDEO TOOK THE CAR IN, DEMANDED THE CAR BE REPAIRED. DID SOME RESEARCH DETERMINE OTHER CAR HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM. EVEN THE RAV4 EV HAD A SIMILAR PROBLEM, COMMONALITY BETWEEN THE B-CLASS AND RAV4 IS THE TESLA BATTERY AND DRIVE TRAIN. I BELIEVE THIS HAS HAPPEN TO OTHER PEOPLES AND THIS IS DISASTER WAITING TO HAPPEN, THIS CAR SHOULD BE RECALLED FOR ALL OWNERS AND REPAIRED

NHTSA ODI #10764173

1,626 miles · Aug 31, 2015
Fuel/propulsion SystemVehicle Speed Control

I WAS DRIVING AT 55 MPH ON THE FREEWAY WITH BOTH HANDS ON THE WHEEL WHEN ALL OF A SUDDEN I LOST POWER TO THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL. NO MECHANICAL PROBLEM WAS INDICATED ON THE DASH: THE CAR WAS 'READY' AND WAS IN 'D' YET I HAD NO POWER WHATSOEVER TO THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL. I COULD NOT PULL OVER TO GET OUT OF TROUBLE BECAUSE I WAS SURR…

Read full complaint

I WAS DRIVING AT 55 MPH ON THE FREEWAY WITH BOTH HANDS ON THE WHEEL WHEN ALL OF A SUDDEN I LOST POWER TO THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL. NO MECHANICAL PROBLEM WAS INDICATED ON THE DASH: THE CAR WAS 'READY' AND WAS IN 'D' YET I HAD NO POWER WHATSOEVER TO THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL. I COULD NOT PULL OVER TO GET OUT OF TROUBLE BECAUSE I WAS SURROUNDED BY FAST MOVING TRAFFIC AND HAD NO POWER. I COULD NOT BRAKE TO TRY TO RESTART THE CAR WITHOUT BEING REAR ENDED BY THE CONSIDERABLE TRAFFIC BEHIND ME ON THE FREEWAY. MY ONLY OPTION WAS TO CONTINUE TO COAST FROM MY INITIAL SPEED WITH THE HAZARD LIGHTS ON EVEN THOUGH I WAS AT HIGH RISK OF BEING STRUCK BY ANOTHER DRIVER. ONCE STOPPED IN THE FAST LANE OF THE FREEWAY, IT TOOK 2 OR 3 ATTEMPTS AT SWITCHING THE POWER ON AND OFF BEFORE THE CAR WAS ABLE TO MOVE AGAIN. THE FAILURE SYMPTOMS APPEAR SIMILAR TO THE RAV4 EV THAT HAS THE SAME POWER COMPONENTS SUPPLIED BY TESLA, AND SINCE MARCH/APRIL 2015 IS THE SUBJECT OF A RECALL NOTICE FOR THIS POWER LOSS ISSUE. WE PURCHASED THIS NEW VEHICLE FROM AN AUTHORIZED MERCEDES DEALER ON JUNE 30, 2015, THERE WAS NO DISCLOSURE OF THIS ISSUE. THE MERCEDES ELECTRIC VEHICLE FAILURE PUT ME AND MY PASSENGER IN A POTENTIALLY FATAL SITUATION.

NHTSA ODI #10760362

2,380 miles · Aug 24, 2015
Fuel/propulsion SystemPower TrainVehicle Speed Control

SUDDEN LOSS OF POWER WHILE DRIVING ON A HIGHWAY AT 65-70MPH. NO INDICATION OF ANY PROBLEM ON DASH BOARD, EXCEPT AN INDICATION THAT IT WAS AT MAXIMUM REGENERATION. GEAR SELECTION INDICATOR DISPLAYED THAT THE CAR WAS IN DRIVE, NOT IN NEUTRAL. NO RESPONSE FROM THROTTLE PEDAL PRESSING. SLOWLY DRIFTED ACROSS MULTIPLE LANES OF HIG…

Read full complaint

SUDDEN LOSS OF POWER WHILE DRIVING ON A HIGHWAY AT 65-70MPH. NO INDICATION OF ANY PROBLEM ON DASH BOARD, EXCEPT AN INDICATION THAT IT WAS AT MAXIMUM REGENERATION. GEAR SELECTION INDICATOR DISPLAYED THAT THE CAR WAS IN DRIVE, NOT IN NEUTRAL. NO RESPONSE FROM THROTTLE PEDAL PRESSING. SLOWLY DRIFTED ACROSS MULTIPLE LANES OF HIGHWAY UNTIL I REACHED THE SHOULDER AND CAME TO A STOP. TURNED CAR OFF AND THEN BACK ON, AFTER WHICH THE CAR BEHAVED NORMALLY AGAIN.

NHTSA ODI #10759022

55 miles · Aug 19, 2015
Fuel/propulsion System

WHILE DRIVING 35 MPH ON TIMED LIGHT RUSH HOUR TRAFFIC ROAD, CAR LOST ACCELERATION CAPABILITY. INSTRUMENTATION PANEL DISPLAYED NORMALLY. CAR DID NOT RESPOND TO SWITCH TO SPORT MODE IN ATTEMPT TO GET MORE RESPONSE. DID NOT STALL COMPLETELY BUT NO ACCELERATION POSSIBLE. NORMAL AFTER TURNED OFF AND RE-START.

NHTSA ODI #10749642

2,100 miles · Aug 4, 2015
Fuel/propulsion System

MY 2015 MERCEDES BENZ B CLASS ELECTRIC DRIVE LOST POWER DURING MY EVENING COMMUTE TODAY LEAVING ME STALLED IN TRAFFIC. I WAS NOT ABLE TO MAKE IT ACROSS ALL 5 LANES OF A BUSY FREEWAY TO THE SHOULDER BEFORE COMING TO A COMPLETE STOP HALFWAY BETWEEN TWO LANES (ONE OF WHICH WAS A BUSY MERGE LANE FROM SFO AIRPORT). I TRIED TO RESTART…

Read full complaint

MY 2015 MERCEDES BENZ B CLASS ELECTRIC DRIVE LOST POWER DURING MY EVENING COMMUTE TODAY LEAVING ME STALLED IN TRAFFIC. I WAS NOT ABLE TO MAKE IT ACROSS ALL 5 LANES OF A BUSY FREEWAY TO THE SHOULDER BEFORE COMING TO A COMPLETE STOP HALFWAY BETWEEN TWO LANES (ONE OF WHICH WAS A BUSY MERGE LANE FROM SFO AIRPORT). I TRIED TO RESTART IT (KEYLESS) A COUPLE OF TIMES WITHOUT SUCCESS- NO MESSAGES ON DASH, REST OF ELECTRONICS (RADIO ETC) STILL WORKING FINE. I DID NOTICE THAT THE GAUGE DROPPED DOWN TO FULL "CHARGING" AS IF THE REGENERATIVE SYSTEM WERE FULLY ENGAGED BUT NOT ALL THE WAY TO OFF WHICH SEEMED ODD. I HIT THE SOS/ASSISTANCE BUTTON TO ASK THEM TO SEND CHP SINCE I WAS BLOCKING TRAFFIC AND GENUINELY FEARED FOR MY SAFETY. WHILE ON THE PHONE WITH THEM SOME GUYS STOPPED AND TRIED TO PUSH ME TO THE SHOULDER SINCE I WAS ONLY 3/4 OF A LANE AWAY BUT THE CAR WOULD NOT MOVE AT ALL. SHORTLY AFTER THEY GAVE UP, I RANDOMLY TRIED TO START THE CAR AGAIN AND IT DID START. I WAS ABLE TO PULL TO THE SHOULDER AND CALL OFF CHP. AFTER COLLECTING MY NERVES A BIT I HEADED FOR THE NEXT OFF RAMP AND MADE IT THE REST OF THE WAY HOME ON SURFACE STREETS WITHOUT INCIDENT. I WILL BE TAKING THE CAR TO THE DEALER IN THE MORNING.

NHTSA ODI #10746003

Official recalls

2

19V787000 · Communication

Nov 1, 2019

Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (MBUSA) is recalling certain 2013-2017 vehicles due to a software fault that may cause the date and time for the emergency call system (eCall) to differ from the actual date and time, potentially relaying an inaccurate vehicle location. For a full list of the affected models visit: https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2019/RMISC-19V787-4620.pdf

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An inaccurate vehicle location may delay emergency responders, increasing the risk of injury.

Remedy: MBUSA has initiated an Over the Air (OTA) remote update. MBUSA will also notify owners, and dealers will check software for a successful OTA or update the communication module software as needed, free of charge. The recall began December 23, 2019. Owners may contact MBUSA customer service at 1-800-367-6372. MBUSA's number for this recall is 2019120008.

15V655000 · Electrical System:propulsion System:traction Battery

Oct 14, 2015

Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA) is recalling certain model year 2014-2015 B-Class Electric Drive vehicles manufactured November 21, 2013, to May 26, 2015. Due to a communication error within the electric drive system, the electric powertrain unit may shut down, temporarily immobilizing the vehicle and resulting in a loss of propulsion power.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A vehicle stall increases the risk of a crash.

Remedy: MBUSA will notify owners, and dealers will update the electric drive system software, free of charge. The recall began on December 2, 2015. Owners may contact MBUSA customer service at 1-800-367-6372.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

2

DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds

Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System

NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.

EA21002 · Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture

Opened Sep 17, 2021 · No close date supplied

Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module; Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.