MY 1996 MAZDA 626 HAD TRANSMISSION FAILURE, IT FAILED WITHOUT WARNING, WHILE DRIVING. I CONTACTED MAZDA AND FORD AND WAS TOLD THAT TRANSMISSION FAILURE WAS COMMON WITH THAT MODEL TRANSMISSION AND VEHICLE. I WAS ALSO TOLD THAT ANY REPAIR OF THE TRANSMISSION WOULD BE AT MY EXPENSE. I HAD THE TRANSMISSION REPAIRED, TO BE CORRECT…
Read full complaint
MY 1996 MAZDA 626 HAD TRANSMISSION FAILURE, IT FAILED WITHOUT WARNING, WHILE DRIVING. I CONTACTED MAZDA AND FORD AND WAS TOLD THAT TRANSMISSION FAILURE WAS COMMON WITH THAT MODEL TRANSMISSION AND VEHICLE. I WAS ALSO TOLD THAT ANY REPAIR OF THE TRANSMISSION WOULD BE AT MY EXPENSE. I HAD THE TRANSMISSION REPAIRED, TO BE CORRECT IT WAS REBUILT. MY CONCERN IS THAT IF FORD AND MAZDA KNOW THAT THERE OR PROBLEMS WITH THESE TRANSMISSIONS WHY DON'T THEY EXTEND WARRANTIES AND INFORM THERE CUSTOMERS. SECONDLY WHY HASN'T THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STEPPED IN AND FORCED THEM TO TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION. MY PARENTS ON A HONDA ACCORD, HONDA HAS ADMITTED THAT THEY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THEIR V6 TRANSMISSIONS, MY PARENTS CAR HAD PROBLEMS AFTER 50,000 MILES. HONDA REPLACED THEIR TRANSMISSION WITH AND UPDATED ONE AND EXTENDED THE TRANSMISSION WARRANTY FOR AN ADDITIONAL 100,000 MILE AFTER THE REPAIR. I FEEL THAT FORD AND MAZDA SHOULD DO THE SAME THING. WITH YOUR HELP I HOPE THAT WILL HAPPEN. *NM
NHTSA ODI #10107568
131,000 miles · Jan 10, 2005
Power Train
I PURCHASED THIS CAR USED IN NOVEMBER OF 2002 WITH APPROXIMATELY 90,000 MILES, TRANSMISSION FAILED ME IN TRAFFIC IN OCTOBER OF 2004, IT PRESENTLY HAS 131,000 MILES. TRANSMISSION WOULD SEEM TO ENGAGE AND THEN DISENGAGE VERY RAPIDLY UNTIL IT FINALLY COMPLETELY FAILED, AND NO LONGER WOULD ENGAGE. I WAS JUST ABLE TO GET OFF THE STR…
Read full complaint
I PURCHASED THIS CAR USED IN NOVEMBER OF 2002 WITH APPROXIMATELY 90,000 MILES, TRANSMISSION FAILED ME IN TRAFFIC IN OCTOBER OF 2004, IT PRESENTLY HAS 131,000 MILES. TRANSMISSION WOULD SEEM TO ENGAGE AND THEN DISENGAGE VERY RAPIDLY UNTIL IT FINALLY COMPLETELY FAILED, AND NO LONGER WOULD ENGAGE. I WAS JUST ABLE TO GET OFF THE STREET. TRANSMISSION SHOPS EST. COST TO BE BETWEEN $1200.00 AND $2500.00 DOLLARS TO REPAIR. I HAVE NOT HAD IT REPAIRED YET. I HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF PRIOR FAILURES OR COMPLAINTS. I HAVE SINCE SEARCHED THE INTERNET AND DISCOVERED THAT THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM FOR THIS CAR AND OTHER CARS SUCH AS THE FORD PROBE, WHICH USES THE SAME TRANSMISSION.*AK
NHTSA ODI #10106051
65,000 miles · Dec 28, 2004
Power Train
I BOUGHT A MAZDA 626 NEW IN 1996 I DRIVE THE CAR TWICE A WEEK... THE CAR HAS ABOUT 60,000 MILES ON IT.. THE TRANSMISSION WENT BAD. AND I WAS TOLD IT WAS A COMMON PROBLEM WITH THE CAR... I LOOKED THIS UP AND THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT THIS PROBLEM... PLEASE DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS, AS I DO NOT HAVE THE $2500.. AND 3 1…
Read full complaint
I BOUGHT A MAZDA 626 NEW IN 1996 I DRIVE THE CAR TWICE A WEEK... THE CAR HAS ABOUT 60,000 MILES ON IT.. THE TRANSMISSION WENT BAD. AND I WAS TOLD IT WAS A COMMON PROBLEM WITH THE CAR... I LOOKED THIS UP AND THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT THIS PROBLEM... PLEASE DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS, AS I DO NOT HAVE THE $2500.. AND 3 1/2 WEEKS IT TAKE TO DO THIS REPAIR... I HAVE TO DO IT.. BUT I CAN NOT AFFORD THE TIME OR MONEY. I CALLED MAZDA ABOUT IT AND THEY SAID IT DIDN'T MATTER THAT EVERY MAZDA 626 THEY HAVE SOLD HAS THIS PROBLEM.... PLEASE LOOK INTO THIS. *JB
NHTSA ODI #10104648
95,000 miles · Dec 23, 2004
Power Train
WHILE DRIVING THE VEHICLE THE TRANSMISSION BROKE.*AK
NHTSA ODI #10104407
51,290 miles · Dec 21, 2004
Power Train
THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE TRANSMISSION MALFUNCTIONED. THE ONLY GEAR THAT WAS RESPONSIVE WAS REVERSE. *AK *SC *JB
NHTSA ODI #10101350
12,000 miles · Dec 16, 2004
Power Train
TRANSMISSION FALIURE AT 72,000 MILES, DEALERSHIP REPLACED TRANSMISSION BEFORE AT 12,000 MILES. MY GUESS IT WAS CD4E TRANSMISSION. *AK
NHTSA ODI #10103983
126,415 miles · Dec 8, 2004
Power Train
1. TRANSMISSION WOULD NOT GO INTO GEAR. 2. HAD VEHICLE TOWED TO RESIDENCE. 3. TOLD THAT TRANSMISSION HAS TO BE REPLACED. COST ABOUT $2500. *JB
NHTSA ODI #10102346
150,168 miles · Nov 29, 2004
Power Train
I AM THE ORIGINAL OWNER OF A 1996 MAZDA 626. I HAVE ALREADY REPLACED MY TRANSMISSION 3 TIMES IN 8 YEARS AND LOOKING AT REPLACING IT AGAIN FOR A 4TH TIME. THE CAR ONLY HAS 150K MILES ON IT. THE TRANSMISSION ONLY LASTS ANYWHERE FROM 30K-40K BEFORE IT GOES OUT. I HAVE CONTACTED MAZDA AND THEY BASICALLY TURN THEIR SHOULDERS. I HAVE …
Read full complaint
I AM THE ORIGINAL OWNER OF A 1996 MAZDA 626. I HAVE ALREADY REPLACED MY TRANSMISSION 3 TIMES IN 8 YEARS AND LOOKING AT REPLACING IT AGAIN FOR A 4TH TIME. THE CAR ONLY HAS 150K MILES ON IT. THE TRANSMISSION ONLY LASTS ANYWHERE FROM 30K-40K BEFORE IT GOES OUT. I HAVE CONTACTED MAZDA AND THEY BASICALLY TURN THEIR SHOULDERS. I HAVE ALREADY SPENT DOUBLE WHAT I ORIGINALLY PAID FOR THE CAR. I WOULD BE HELPFUL IF MAZDA WOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE A SERIOUS TRANSMISSION ISSUE.*AK
NHTSA ODI #10100698
27,000 miles · Nov 5, 2004
Power Train
PURCHASED THE VEHICLE (1996 MAZDA 626) AT 27,000MI ON ODOMETER - TRANSMISSION HAD GONE BAD. BECAUSE IT WAS STILL IN WARRANTEE, THE MAZDA DEALERSHIP REPLACED THE TRANSMISSION. I TOOK IT BACK A FEW TIMES OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS BECAUSE OF LEAKING TRANSMISSION FLUID AND ENGINE LIGHT BEING ON. NOTHING WAS FOUND OR DONE. LAST DE…
Read full complaint
PURCHASED THE VEHICLE (1996 MAZDA 626) AT 27,000MI ON ODOMETER - TRANSMISSION HAD GONE BAD. BECAUSE IT WAS STILL IN WARRANTEE, THE MAZDA DEALERSHIP REPLACED THE TRANSMISSION. I TOOK IT BACK A FEW TIMES OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS BECAUSE OF LEAKING TRANSMISSION FLUID AND ENGINE LIGHT BEING ON. NOTHING WAS FOUND OR DONE. LAST DECEMBER, AT 96,000MI, THE TRANSMISSION BURNED OUT AGAIN. I TOOK IT TO THE DEALERSHIP WHO SAID THE TRANSMISSION WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED AGAIN. THIS WOULD BE THE 3RD TRANSMISSION IN UNDER 100,000 MILES!! AS MAZDA WOULD NOT ASSIST IN THE COST OF REPLACEMENT, IN JULY I HAD THE CAR TOWED TO A LOCAL MECHANIC WHO REPLACED THE TRANSMISSION WITH A REBUILT ONE. A FEW WEEKS AGO (OCTOBER 2004) THE O/D LIGHT STARTED BLINKING AND I TOOK IT BACK TO THE MECHANIC WHO REPLACED THE TRANSMISSION. HE SEARCHED DEEPER AND FOUND THAT THE CUPHOLDER IS PLACED DIRECTLY OVER THE CAR'S COMPUTER, AND HAD BEEN LEAKING ANY SPILLED FLUID ONTO IT, SHORTING OUT THE OVERDRIVE, CAUSING THE TRANSMISSION SOLONOID TO BURN OUT. HE CLEANED THE COMPUTER AND REPLACED THE TCC SOLENOID, MAZDA TAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY EVEN THOUGH THEIR TECHNICIANS HAD THE CAR SEVERAL TIMES WITHOUT PROPERLY DIAGNOSING THE PROBLEM.*AK
NHTSA ODI #10098320
57,000 miles · Nov 1, 2004
Power Train
TRANSMISSION HAD BIG PROBLEMS, EVEN AFTER USING THE CAR EXTREMELY CAREFULLY. JUST HAD 57000 MILES AND HAD TO GET MAJOR REPAIRS DONE TO THE TRANSMISSION. *AK
Mazda North American Operations (Mazda) is recalling certain model year 1989-1998 MPV, 1990-1995 323, 1990-1998 Protege, 1992-1993 MX-3, 1993-1995 929, 1993-1997 MX-6, and 1993-1998 626 vehicles. In the affected vehicles, grease applied to the contact points inside the ignition switch may become conductive and overheat.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: If the ignition switch overheats there would be an increased risk of a fire.
Remedy: Mazda will notify owners, and dealers will replace the ignition switch, free of charge. The recall began on December 17, 2015. Owners may contact Mazda Customer Experience Center at 1-800-222-5500, option#6. Mazda's number for this recall is 8715J.
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH THE SAS SENSOR UNIT. THESE VEHICLES CAN EXPERIENCE AIR BAG DEPLOYMENTS IN MINOR UNDERCARRIAGE IMPACTS.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: UNEXPECTED AIR BAG DEPLOYMENT CAN RESULT IN OCCUPANT INJURY.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPROGRAM THE SAS UNIT TO REDUCE THE PROBABILITY OF UNNECESSARY DEPLOYMENTS IN LOW SPEED UNDERCARRIAGE IMPACTS.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
4
RQ99022 · Headlight Failure
Opened Dec 20, 1999 · Closed Aug 30, 2000
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Exterior Lighting
OBTAINED RECALL 99V-358
SQ98024 · Speedometer Inoperative
Opened Oct 29, 1998 · Closed Sep 10, 1999
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Power Train
SEE RESUME FOR DETAILS.
EA97012 · Oversensitive Air Bag Deployment
Opened May 23, 1997 · Closed Oct 9, 1998
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags
IN MAY OF 1997, ODI UPGRADED TO AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH 51 COMPLAINTS.ODI IS NOW AWARE OF 88 COMPLAINTS OF ALLEGED INAPPROPRIATE AIRBAG DEPLOYMENTS.TYPICAL COMPLAINTS ALLEGE THAT THE AIRBAGS DEPLOYED AFTER THE VEHICLE HIT A POT HOLE AT BETWEEN 20 AND 45 MPH, OR THAT THE AIRBAGS DEPLOYED WHILE DRIVING AT BETWEEN 20 OR 60 MPH FOR NO APPARENT REASON.APPROXIMATELY 25 DRIVERS ALLEGED THAT THEY DID NOT HIT ANYTHING IN THE ROADWAY.MAZDA WILL CONDUCT A SAFETY RECALL OFALL 1995 AND 1996 MODELS OF THE MAZDA 626 AND MX-6, AS WELL AS A SMALL NUMBER OF 1997 MAZDA 626 MODELS, EQUIPPED WITH THE SAME SAS UNIT.THE SAS UNIT CONTROLS THE AIRBAG SYSTEMIT CONTAINS A BUILT-IN CRASH SENSOR TO DETECT VEHICLE DECELERATION DURING A COLLISION.AFFECTED MODELS WERE ASSEMBLED FROM JUNE 1, 1994 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 10, 1996 AND HAVE A VIN WITHIN THE FOLLOWING RANGES: MAZDA 626:1YVGE22**S5300001 THROUGH 1YVGE22**V5599030 MAZDA MX-6: 1YVGE31**S5300001 THROUGH 1YVGE31**T5589965ALL OWNERS WILL BE NOTIFIED OF THE POSSIBILITY THAT THEIR VEHICLE MAY EXPERIENCE AN UNNECESSARY AIRBAG DEPOYMENT IN CERTAIN SITUATIONS.THEY WILL BE INSTRUCTED TO BRING THEIR VEHICLE TO A MAZDA DEALER TO REPROGRAM THE SAS UNIT TO REDUCE THE FREQUENCY OF UNNECESSARY DEPLOYMENTS.
PE97006 · Inappropriate Air Bag Deployment
Opened Jan 30, 1997 · Closed May 23, 1997
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags
IN JANUARY OF 1997, ODI OPENED A PE BASED ON 9 ODI COMPLAINTS.ODI IS NOW AWARE OF 51 COMPLAINTS OF ALLEGED INAPPROPRIATE AIR BAG DEPLOYMENTS.TYPICAL COMPLAINTS INCLUDE AIR BAG DEPLOYMENTS AFTER THE VEHICLE HIT A POT HOLE WHILE DRIVING BETWEEN 20 AND 45 MPH AND AIR BAG DEPLOYMENTS WHILE DRIVING AT SPEEDS BETWEEN 20 AND 60 MPH FOR NO APPARENT REASON.APPROXIMATELY 21 DRIVERS ALLEGED THAT THEY DID NOT HIT ANYTHING PRIOR TO THE AIR BAG DEPLOYMENT.IN FOUR OF THESE INCIDENTS THE DRIVER CLAIMS TO HAVE LOST CONTROL AND HIT A CURB AFTER THE AIR BAGS DEPLOYED.IN ADDITION THERE ARE FOUR INCIDENTS WHERE THE DRIVER ALLEGES THAT THE AIR BAGS DEPLOYED AFTER A TIRE BLOWOUT WHILE DRIVING.LESS COMMON INCIDENTS INCLUDE ALLEGATIONS OF THE AIR BAGS DEPLOYING AFTER PARKING THE VEHICLE AND REMOVING THE KEY, CROSSING RAILROAD TRACKS, WHILE BEING TOWED, WHILE BRAKING, AFTER HITTING A CURB, AND AFTER HITTING A MANHOLE COVER.ODI IS UPGRADING THIS INVESTIGATION TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE REPORTS GATHERED TO DATE, THE SENSORS USED IN THE VEHICLES, AND TO ASSESS THE IMPACT THAT THE ALLEGED DEFECT HAS ON HIGHWAY SAFETY.
1996 Mazda 626 Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year