HEADLIGHTS TOO WEAK TO ALLOW SAFE NIGHT DRIVING. NEED HIGH BEAMS CONTINUALLY.*AK
1995 Lincoln Mark Viii
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
Similar to other model years
Owner complaints for the 1995 Lincoln Mark Viii do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 86.5.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Mark Viii years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
Limited mileage data: 26 of 136 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Exterior Lighting. Review the 103 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 12 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Structure. Review the 6 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
What owners actually said
136 reportsLOW BEAM HEADLAMPS ARE INADEQUATE FOR SAFE NIGHT HIGHWAY DRIVING; INSUFFICIENT LIGHT.*AK
THE FACTORY HEADLIGHTS ARE SUBSTANDARD AT BEST AND DANGEROUS IN LOW LIGHT CONDITIONS, SUCH AS POORLY LIT STREETS.THE BRAKE ROTORS FRONT AND REAR ARE FAILING ON MY CAR AND MANY OTHERS CARS AT AN ALARMING RATE. I'VE CHANGED BRAKE PADS BEFORE IN AS LITTLE AS 5000 MILES, NEVER HAVE I HAD TO REPLACE A ROTOR AT 3000 MILES. 3000 MILES …
Read full complaint
THE FACTORY HEADLIGHTS ARE SUBSTANDARD AT BEST AND DANGEROUS IN LOW LIGHT CONDITIONS, SUCH AS POORLY LIT STREETS.THE BRAKE ROTORS FRONT AND REAR ARE FAILING ON MY CAR AND MANY OTHERS CARS AT AN ALARMING RATE. I'VE CHANGED BRAKE PADS BEFORE IN AS LITTLE AS 5000 MILES, NEVER HAVE I HAD TO REPLACE A ROTOR AT 3000 MILES. 3000 MILES IS AN INTERVAL FOR ENGINE SERVICE...NOT BRAKES, BRAKES SHOULD LAST 10,000 MILES EASY. MY ROTORS WERE WARPED IN 3000 MILES FROM THE PURCHASE. THIS IS CAUSEING BRAKE AND CONTROL PROBLEMS WITH MY CAR.*AK
EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO SEE WITH LOW BEAMS - HAVE TO USE HIGH BEAMS TO SEE FAIRLY WELL.*AK
HORRIBLE VISION WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT. REQUEST A FACTORY UPGRADE TO THE '1996 LIGHT SYSTEM.*AK
BOTH FRONT HEADLAMP ASSEMBLIES HAVE DETERIORATED TO THE POINT WHERE THE CAR WILL NOT PASS STATE INSPECTION, AND ALSO THE LIGHTS ARE SO DULL YOU CAN NOT SEE THE ROAD AT NIGHT. I HAVE BEEN USING MY HIGH BEAMS AT NIGHT FOR SEVERAL WEEKS AND THEY ARE SO DULL NO ONE KNOWS THAT THEY ARE THE HIGH BEAMS. THE DEALERSHIP REPLACED THE BULB…
Read full complaint
BOTH FRONT HEADLAMP ASSEMBLIES HAVE DETERIORATED TO THE POINT WHERE THE CAR WILL NOT PASS STATE INSPECTION, AND ALSO THE LIGHTS ARE SO DULL YOU CAN NOT SEE THE ROAD AT NIGHT. I HAVE BEEN USING MY HIGH BEAMS AT NIGHT FOR SEVERAL WEEKS AND THEY ARE SO DULL NO ONE KNOWS THAT THEY ARE THE HIGH BEAMS. THE DEALERSHIP REPLACED THE BULBS WITH NEW ONES AND PERFORMANCE DID NOT IMPROVE. THERE WAS NO INCREASE IN BRIGHTNESS IN THE HEADLAMPS. IT LOOKS LIKE THE OPACITY OF THE PLASTIC LENS HAS CLOUDED OR CHANGED AND WILL NOT LET LIGHT THROUGH. THE ENTIRE ASSEMBLY HAS TO BE REPLACED AT A COST OF $550. THE DEALER HAS TOLD ME THAT THESE HEADLAMPS HAVE FAILED IN OTHER LINCOLNS AND BEEN REPLACED AT THE DEALERSHIP. THIS IS ONLY A SMALL TOWN, I WONDER HOW MANY OF THESE HAVE FAILED ACROSS THE COUNTRY. I BELIEVE THIS IS A SAFETY DESIGN FLAW. THIS CAR HAS NEVER BEEN IN A COLLISION TO CAUSE THE DETERIORATION. LINCOLN HAS BEEN CONTACTED AND HAS NO DETAILS THAT THEY WOULD TELL ME ON THE FAILURE OF THE HEADLAMPS. I HAVE PREVIOUSLY REPORTED THIS TO YOU SEVERAL DAYS AGO AND HAD NOT RECEIVED ANY NOTICE THAT YOU HAD RECEIVED THE INFORMATION. THANK-YOU FOR LOOKING INTO THIS MATTER.
NO SUMMARY
NEED LAMPS REPLACED DUE TO MANUFACTURE PROBLEM
THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ON THIS CAR HAVE BEEN INADEQUATE FROM DAY ONE. VISIBILITY IS EXTREMELY LIMITED, AND LARGE SUMS OF MONEY HAVE BEEN SPENT TO TRY AND REMEDY THE SITUATION TO NO AVAIL. THE SQUAT DESIGN OF THE LAMPS REDUCES THE AVAILABLE SIZE OF THE REFLECTOR. THEN, THE CLOSE PROXIMITY OF THE BULB TO THE REFLECTOR CAUSES T…
Read full complaint
THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ON THIS CAR HAVE BEEN INADEQUATE FROM DAY ONE. VISIBILITY IS EXTREMELY LIMITED, AND LARGE SUMS OF MONEY HAVE BEEN SPENT TO TRY AND REMEDY THE SITUATION TO NO AVAIL. THE SQUAT DESIGN OF THE LAMPS REDUCES THE AVAILABLE SIZE OF THE REFLECTOR. THEN, THE CLOSE PROXIMITY OF THE BULB TO THE REFLECTOR CAUSES THE REFLECTIVE COATING TO COOK AND BURN OFF. I HAVE HAD SEVERAL CLOSE CALLS WHEN DRIVING THIS CAR AT NIGHT, AND AVOID DOING SO ANYMORE. LINCOLN IS AWARE OF THIS PROBLEM, BUT HAS DONE NOTHING TO RESOLVE IT.
NO SUMMARY
Official recalls
107V336000 · Vehicle Speed Control
Aug 3, 2007
ON CERTAIN PICKUP TRUCKS, PASSENGER VEHICLES, SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, AND MOTOR HOMES CHASSIS, THE SPEED CONTROL DEACTIVATION SWITCH MAY, UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS, LEAK INTERNALLY AND THEN OVERHEAT, SMOKE, OR BURN.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THIS COULD RESULT IN AN UNDERHOOD FIRE.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL A FUSED WIRING HARNESS. OWNERS OF THE PASSENGER CARS INCLUDED IN THIS CAMPAIGN WILL BE INSTRUCTED TO RETURN THEIR VEHICLES TO THEIR DEALERS TO HAVE THE SPEED CONTROL DEACTIVATION SWITCH DISCONNECTED AS AN INTERIM REPAIR. AS SOON AS REPAIR PARTS ARE AVAILABLE (EXPECTED OCTOBER 2007), OWNERS WILL BE INSTRUCTED TO RETURN TO THE DEALERS FOR INSTALLATION OF A FUSED WIRING HARNESS. THE RECALL BEGAN ON AUGUST 13, 2007, AND MAILING COMPLETED BY SEPTEMBER 19, 2007. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-888-222-2751.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
2EA96019 · Headlight Failure
Opened Jul 31, 1996 · Closed Jan 26, 1998
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Exterior Lighting
EXCESSIVE HEAT IN AN IMPROPERLY MANUFACTURED CIRCUIT BREAKER WITHIN THE HEADLIGHT SWITCH CAUSED THAT CIRCUIT BREAKER TO OPEN FOR TIME PERIODS OF VARYING LENGTH TO COOL OFF.OPENING OF THE CIRCUIT BREAKER IN THIS MANNER INTERRUPTS ELECTRIC CURRENT FLOW TO THE HEADLIGHTS, SHUTTING THEM OFF.HEADLIGHT OUTAGES HAVE RANGER FROM BRIEF FLICKERS (LESS THAN ONE SECOND) TO GREATER THAN 20 SECONDS.OVER TIME, THE OUTAGES GROW IN LENGTH AND DURATION BECAUSE OF HEAT-INDUCED DETERIORATION OF THE SWITCH AND ASSOCIATED WIRING.RECALL 98V-009 WILL APPLY TO APPROXIMATELY 506,000 TAURUS, SABLE, MARK VIII, AND CONTINENTAL VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM 1-DEC.-92 THROUGH 30-SEP-93 AT THE ATLANTA, CHICAGO,AND WIXOM ASSEMBLY PLANTS.87% OF MY 1992-1995 TAURUS/SABLE AND 97% OF MY 1993-1995 MARK VIII WARRANTY REPAIRS (HEADLIGHT SWITCH REPLACEMENT) INVOLVED VEHICLES BUILT DURING THE DEC. 92 - OCT. 93 BUILD RANGE.
PE95007 · Brake Pedal Separation From Pivot Arm
Opened Feb 1, 1995 · Closed May 4, 1995
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic
There is no summary currently available
Illustration