← New search

1995 Lincoln Mark Viii

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 1995 Lincoln Mark Viii do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 86.5.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Mark Viii years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

Limited mileage data: 26 of 136 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Exterior Lighting. Review the 103 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 12 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Structure. Review the 6 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

12 crash reports1 fire reports3 injury reports

Exterior Lighting complaints

103 reports
Clear category filter
Mileage unknown · Apr 4, 2002
Exterior Lighting

ESPECIALLY SINCE THE SEARCH FOR "HEAD LIGHTS" BRINGS NO REPORTS FROM THIS SITE. IN REGARDS TO THE 1993-1996 LINCOLN MARK VIII HEADLAMPS, THEY ARE DESTINED TO FAIL EVERY TIME. THE REFLECTOR COATING INSIDE THE ASSEMBLY IS HEATED BY THE 65 WATT 9005 BULB TO THE POINT THAT THE COATING IS REMOVED FROM THE BACK OF THE REFLECTOR, AS …

Read full complaint

ESPECIALLY SINCE THE SEARCH FOR "HEAD LIGHTS" BRINGS NO REPORTS FROM THIS SITE. IN REGARDS TO THE 1993-1996 LINCOLN MARK VIII HEADLAMPS, THEY ARE DESTINED TO FAIL EVERY TIME. THE REFLECTOR COATING INSIDE THE ASSEMBLY IS HEATED BY THE 65 WATT 9005 BULB TO THE POINT THAT THE COATING IS REMOVED FROM THE BACK OF THE REFLECTOR, AS WELL AS THE TOP OF THE REFLECTOR. THIS REDUCES THE AMOUNT OF LIGHT AT NIGHT, DUE TO THE FLAT WHITE PLASTIC THAT IS REVEALED. THE TOP OF THE REFLECTOR IS BROWNED AND BLACKENED FROM HEAT, FURTHER REDUCING THE LIGHT DUE TO ABSORBTION. ALSO, THE ASSEMBLY ITSELF IS DETERIORATING DUE TO THE HEAT, BUBBLING FROM THE INSIDE, AND IT IS BELIEVED BY SOME THAT THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ELECTRICAL FIRE. THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE ON *ALL* 1993-1996 HALOGEN EQUIPPED MARK VIIIS. FORD DID MAKE A SOLUTION, BUT IT WAS ONLY AN OPTION FOR 1996 MY LINCOLN MARK VIII LSC MODELS. THEY WERE DIRECT REPLACEMENT, HID ASSEMBLIES, ELEMENTS, AND BALLASTS. IT MUST BE QUESTIONED AS TO WHY, AS AT THE TIME, THE HID SOLUTIONS WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY COSTLY, IN COMPARISON. MY WEBSITE, HTTP://WEB.WT.NET/~HOUTEX/MARKLIGHTS.HTM, HAS A VERY DETAILED EXPLAINATION AND DIAGRAM CONCERING THIS POTENTIAL DEADLY SAFETY DEFECT. PLEASE, I URGE YOU TO RESPOND QUICKLY. A MR. [XXX] FROM YOUR ORGANIZATION WAS SUPPOSED TO BE INVOLVED IN AN INVESTIGATION, BUT I'VE NOT HAD A RESPONSE FROM HIM REGARDING MY EMAILS AT [XXX]. IF HE IS NOT THE CORRECT CONTACT, OR I HAVE INCORRECT INFORMATION, PLEASE, WOULD YOU INFORM ME AT [XXX]? THERE ARE A POTENTIAL 98000+ DEFECTIVE 1993-1996 MARK VIIIS OUT THERE. THAT'S A LOT OF POSSIBLE ACCIDENTS. I SURELY WOULD NOT WANT TO ACCIDENTALLY RUN SOMEONE OVER BECAUSE I WAS DRIVING MY MARK AT NIGHT AND DIDN'T SEE THEM DUE TO THE BAD LIGHTS. PLEASE HURRY. THANK YOU. SINCERELY, [XXX]. *AK PARTS OF THIS DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN REDACTED TO PROTECT PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6).

NHTSA ODI #760234

Mileage unknown · Apr 2, 2002
Exterior Lighting

HEADLIGHTS ARE POOR QUALITY AND WERE UPGRADED IN 1996-1997 MODELS. *AK

NHTSA ODI #760161

Mileage unknown · Mar 18, 2002
Exterior Lighting

THIS IS TO REGISTER A COMPLAINT ABOUT THE INADEQUATE LIGHTING SYSTEM OF THE GENERATION 1 MARK VIII, MINE IS YEAR 1995. THIS HEADLIGHT SYSTEM IS TOTALLY INADEQUATE AT NIGHT TIME, AND FREQUENTLY REQUIRES I USE MY "HIGH BEAMS" TO SEE APPROPRIATELY, EVEN WITH LAMP POSTS ON AND SHINING. I'VE OFTEN FOUND MYSELF SWERVING TO AVOID BAD…

Read full complaint

THIS IS TO REGISTER A COMPLAINT ABOUT THE INADEQUATE LIGHTING SYSTEM OF THE GENERATION 1 MARK VIII, MINE IS YEAR 1995. THIS HEADLIGHT SYSTEM IS TOTALLY INADEQUATE AT NIGHT TIME, AND FREQUENTLY REQUIRES I USE MY "HIGH BEAMS" TO SEE APPROPRIATELY, EVEN WITH LAMP POSTS ON AND SHINING. I'VE OFTEN FOUND MYSELF SWERVING TO AVOID BADLY MARKED CURBS ON THE LEFT SIDE, FOR EXAMPLE, BECAUSE BY THE TIME I SEE THESE CURBS, I'M ALMOST ON TOP OF THEM. THIS IS NOT AN INDICATION OF BAD DRIVING, IT'S JUST PLAIN BAD LIGHTS. FORD FIXES THIS PROBLEM WITH THEIR HID LAMPS IN THE 1996 LSC, WHICH ACCORDING TO MANY, IS A "DIRECT FIT" REPLACEMENT FOR THESE GEN 1 MARK VIIIS. I AM UNSURE HOW MANY OF THESE BAD LIGHT SYSTEMS ARE OUT ON THE ROAD, BUT I AM ABSOLUTELY SURE THAT WITH ENOUGH OF A SAFETLY CONCERN, THESE SHOULD BE FIXED. IT IS IMPERATIVE THIS BE ADDRESSED. I DO NOT FEEL THAT I PAID FOR A LUXURY CAR TO HAVE TO SPEND AN EXTRA 1000 OR MORE TO BE ABLE TO BE SAFE AT NIGHT. IF FORD HAD PROPERLY TESTED THEIR SYSTEM, IT WOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE TODAY. REPLACEMENT LENSES ALONE WILL NOT WORK, AS THEY WILL FAIL TO PROVIDE LIGHT AS QUICKLY AS THE CURRENT ONES DID, NEGATING THE BENEFITS. BRIGHTER BULBS ALSO DO NOT WORK, EITHER DUE TO THE BAD LENSES, OR FAILURE OF THE SOCKETS AND HOUSINGS DUE TO THE HIGHER HEAT. AND IF *THAT* ISN'T A SAFTEY ISSUE (ELECTRICAL FIRE DUE TO HIGHER WATTAGE BY AN ATTEMPT TO FIX A KNOWN PROBLEM) I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS. FORD NEEDS TO FIX THIS ISSUE, BOTTOM LINE, FOR THE SAFTEY OF NOT ONLY THE OWNERS OF THE GEN1 MARK VIIIS, BUT FOR THE OTHERS ON THE ROAD AS WELL. THANK YOU FOR YOUR INQUIRY INTO THIS MATTER. SINCERELY, [XXX]. *AK PARTS OF THIS DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN REDACTED TO PROTECT PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6).

NHTSA ODI #759482

Mileage unknown · Mar 16, 2002
Exterior Lighting

HEADLAMPS ARE DIM AND SEEM TO BE GETTING DIMMER AS THEY AGE. AFTER CHANGING THE BULBS IN THE LENS ASSEMBLIES AND NOTING THAT THE LIGHTS DID NOT IMPROVE, INSPECTION OF THE LENS UNIT REVEALED BURN MARKS AND PEELING OFF OF THE REFLECTIVE COATING INSIDE THE UNIT. IT IS SO BAD ON THE RIGHT SIDE THAT A CRACK HAS APPEARED AND MOISTUR…

Read full complaint

HEADLAMPS ARE DIM AND SEEM TO BE GETTING DIMMER AS THEY AGE. AFTER CHANGING THE BULBS IN THE LENS ASSEMBLIES AND NOTING THAT THE LIGHTS DID NOT IMPROVE, INSPECTION OF THE LENS UNIT REVEALED BURN MARKS AND PEELING OFF OF THE REFLECTIVE COATING INSIDE THE UNIT. IT IS SO BAD ON THE RIGHT SIDE THAT A CRACK HAS APPEARED AND MOISTURE IS ENTERING THE UNIT. MANY OWNERS WILL NOT THINK IT IS THEIR HEADLAMPS THAT ARE AT FAULT WHEN THEY HAVE DIFFICULTY SEEING AT NIGHT. I THOUGHT IT WAS MY EYESIGHT THAT WAS GOING BAD. I FEEL THIS IS A SAFETY HAZARD THAT SOULD BE CORRECTED BY THE MANUFACTURER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. I'VE SEEN SOME OTHER MARK 8'S WITH THIS SAME MOISTURE ON THE LENS SO I THINK THIS IS A VERY COMMON PROBLEM. WE NEED YOUR HELP. *AK

NHTSA ODI #759441

Mileage unknown · Mar 15, 2002
Exterior Lighting

MAIN BEAMS ARE EXTREMELY DIM, AND HIGH BEAMS ARE ADEQUATE FOR NORMAL DRIVING, WHICH IS COMPLETELY WRONG, OF COURSE. FORD APPARENTLY HAS A "FIX" THAT WE CAN PURCHASE FOR ABOUT $900 IN PARTS, THEY ARE CALLED HID HEAD LAMP ASSEMBLIES. THIS PROBLEM IS VEHICLE DESIGN WIDE FOR GENERATION 1 MARK VIII YEARS 1993-1996. SOME LATE GEN 1 MA…

Read full complaint

MAIN BEAMS ARE EXTREMELY DIM, AND HIGH BEAMS ARE ADEQUATE FOR NORMAL DRIVING, WHICH IS COMPLETELY WRONG, OF COURSE. FORD APPARENTLY HAS A "FIX" THAT WE CAN PURCHASE FOR ABOUT $900 IN PARTS, THEY ARE CALLED HID HEAD LAMP ASSEMBLIES. THIS PROBLEM IS VEHICLE DESIGN WIDE FOR GENERATION 1 MARK VIII YEARS 1993-1996. SOME LATE GEN 1 MARK VIIIS WERE LSC MODELS AND THEY CAME WITH THE HIDS. THERE IS A PROCEEDURE, AND MANY DOCUMENTS, REGARDING THIS ISSUE AT WWW.MARKVIII.ORG, THEIR FORUMS ARE LITTERED WITH THE ISSUE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. FIX THIS PROBLEM BEFORE PEOPLE CRASH BECAUSE THEY CANT SEE AT NIGHT AND DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!*AK

NHTSA ODI #759399

Mileage unknown · Mar 3, 2002
Exterior Lighting

THE HEADLIGHTS ON THIS VEHICLES ARE VERY DIM. YEARS '1993-1995 THE LIGHTS ARE SO BAD AND IT IS A SAFETY ISSUE. YOU CANNOT SEE ANYTHING AND FORD KNOWS ABOUT THE PROBLEM AND WANTS $1600 TO FIX IT.*AK

NHTSA ODI #758886

Mileage unknown · Mar 3, 2002
Exterior Lighting

MY COMPLAINT ON THESE HEADLIGHTS IS THE LACK OF GOOD LIGHTING. UNLIKE OTHER OWNERS, MY LIGHTS HAVE NOT YELLOWED NOR HAS ANY OF THE REFLECTIVE MATERIAL PEELED INSIDE THE HOUSING. THESE LIGHTS PLAIN SUCK. FORD/LINCOLN SAW FIT TO EQUIP THE LSC MODELS OF THE MARK VIII (1995-1996) WITH HID LIGHTING SYSTEMS, WHILE THE BASE MODEL MARK …

Read full complaint

MY COMPLAINT ON THESE HEADLIGHTS IS THE LACK OF GOOD LIGHTING. UNLIKE OTHER OWNERS, MY LIGHTS HAVE NOT YELLOWED NOR HAS ANY OF THE REFLECTIVE MATERIAL PEELED INSIDE THE HOUSING. THESE LIGHTS PLAIN SUCK. FORD/LINCOLN SAW FIT TO EQUIP THE LSC MODELS OF THE MARK VIII (1995-1996) WITH HID LIGHTING SYSTEMS, WHILE THE BASE MODEL MARK VIII FROM 1993-1996 USED STANDARD HALOGEN LIGHTING. THE HALOGEN LIGHTS ARE ABOUT AS EFFECTIVE AS A CANDEL IN A HURRICANE, AND IN MY OPINION AND THE OPINIONS OF OTHER OWNERS CREATES A VERY REAL HAZZARD FOR NIGHT TIME DRIVING. 1997-98 MARK VIII HAD HID LIGHTS ON ALL MODELS, AND THE HOUSINGS ARE A BIT LARGER, WHICH LEADS ME TO BELIEVE THAT THEY KNEW THE STANDARD HALOGEN LIGHTS WERE A BAD DESIGN FROM THE BEGINNING, AND WAITED 4 YEARS TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM. SYLVANIA, THE MANUFACTURER OF THE HEADLIGHT HOUSINGS IS JUST AS MUCH TO BLAME AS FORD/LINCOLN FOR THE FLAWS IN THESE UNITS. KNOWING THE HALOGEN UNITS ARE AS INNEFFECTIVE AS THEY ARE, THE HID LIGHTS SHOULD HAVE BEEN STANDAR EQUIPMENT ON ALL MODELS, AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN A WARRANTY UPGRADE FOR ALL CARS NOT SO EQUIPPED FROM THE FACTORY INCLUDING THE 1993-94 MODELS AS WELL AS THE 1995-96 MODELS. THIS IS NOT FORD BASHING, I AM A FORD GUY ALL THE WAY, BUT THIS TYPE OF BAD DESIGN IS JUST WRONG, AND COULD LEAD TO SERIOUS INJURY.*AK

NHTSA ODI #758874

Mileage unknown · Mar 1, 2002
Exterior Lighting

ALL 1995 MARKVIII CARS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH THE HID HEADLIGHTS THAT WERE INCLUDED IN SOME OF THE LSC MODELS OF THESE CARS ARE A DANGER TO THE PUBLIC AND THE DRIVERS OF THESE CARS. THE LIGHTING IS INADEQUATE FOR SAFE NIGHT TIME DRIVING. THE LIGHTS ARE VERY DIM AND I HAVE HAD CLOSE CALLS BECAUSE OF THIS. I AM ALWAYS HAVI…

Read full complaint

ALL 1995 MARKVIII CARS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH THE HID HEADLIGHTS THAT WERE INCLUDED IN SOME OF THE LSC MODELS OF THESE CARS ARE A DANGER TO THE PUBLIC AND THE DRIVERS OF THESE CARS. THE LIGHTING IS INADEQUATE FOR SAFE NIGHT TIME DRIVING. THE LIGHTS ARE VERY DIM AND I HAVE HAD CLOSE CALLS BECAUSE OF THIS. I AM ALWAYS HAVING TO DRIVE THE CAR WITH THE HIGH BEAMS ON JUST SO I CAN SAFELY SEE THE ROAD. THE HIGH BEAMS BEING ON CAN CAUSE DANGEROUS CONDITIONS FOR ONCOMING VEHICLES SO I AM CONSTANTLY HAVING TO SWITCH FROM LOW TO HIGH BEAMS. THIS PROBLEM AFFECTS EVERY NON HID EQUIPPED MARKVIII VEHICLES AND I AM HOPING THAT SOMETHING CAN BE DONE TO CORRECT THIS. *AK

NHTSA ODI #758823

Mileage unknown · Mar 1, 2002
Exterior Lighting

I HATE THE POOR LIGHTING THESE HEADLIGHTS PROVIDE. MANT MARK VIII OWNERS RUN THE HIGH BEAMS ALL THE TIME WITH THE ADJUSTMENTS SET SO THEY DON'T AIM INTO UNCOMING DRIVERS EYES. I BELIEVE THE MANUFACTURER NEEDS TO RECTIFY THIS, AND THEY ALREADY HAVE THE "HID'' LIGHTS AVAILABLE AS THESE UNITS WERE INSTALLED ON MID-YEAR 1995S AND 19…

Read full complaint

I HATE THE POOR LIGHTING THESE HEADLIGHTS PROVIDE. MANT MARK VIII OWNERS RUN THE HIGH BEAMS ALL THE TIME WITH THE ADJUSTMENTS SET SO THEY DON'T AIM INTO UNCOMING DRIVERS EYES. I BELIEVE THE MANUFACTURER NEEDS TO RECTIFY THIS, AND THEY ALREADY HAVE THE "HID'' LIGHTS AVAILABLE AS THESE UNITS WERE INSTALLED ON MID-YEAR 1995S AND 1996S THAT WERE CALLED LSCS. HID LIGHTING ON THESE CARS IS GREAT!'*AK

NHTSA ODI #758792

Mileage unknown · Feb 27, 2002
Exterior Lighting

MAIN BEAMS ARE EXTREMELY DIM, AND HIGH BEAMS ARE ADEQUATE FOR NORMAL DRIVING, WHICH IS COMPLETELY WRONG, OF COURSE. FORD APPARENTLY HAS A "FIX" THAT WE CAN PURCHASE FOR ABOUT $900 IN PARTS, THEY ARE CALLED HID HEAD LAMP ASSEMBLIES. THIS PROBLEM IS VEHICLE DESIGN WIDE FOR GENERATION 1 MARK VIII YEARS 1993-1996. SOME LATE GEN 1…

Read full complaint

MAIN BEAMS ARE EXTREMELY DIM, AND HIGH BEAMS ARE ADEQUATE FOR NORMAL DRIVING, WHICH IS COMPLETELY WRONG, OF COURSE. FORD APPARENTLY HAS A "FIX" THAT WE CAN PURCHASE FOR ABOUT $900 IN PARTS, THEY ARE CALLED HID HEAD LAMP ASSEMBLIES. THIS PROBLEM IS VEHICLE DESIGN WIDE FOR GENERATION 1 MARK VIII YEARS 1993-1996. SOME LATE GEN 1 MARK VIIIS WERE LSC MODELS AND THEY CAME WITH THE HIDS. THERE IS A PROCEEDURE, AND MANY DOCUMENTS, REGARDING THIS ISSUE AT WWW.MARKVIII.ORG, THEIR FORUMS ARE LITTERED WITH THE ISSUE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. *AK

NHTSA ODI #758710

Official recalls

1

07V336000 · Vehicle Speed Control

Aug 3, 2007

ON CERTAIN PICKUP TRUCKS, PASSENGER VEHICLES, SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, AND MOTOR HOMES CHASSIS, THE SPEED CONTROL DEACTIVATION SWITCH MAY, UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS, LEAK INTERNALLY AND THEN OVERHEAT, SMOKE, OR BURN.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: THIS COULD RESULT IN AN UNDERHOOD FIRE.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL A FUSED WIRING HARNESS. OWNERS OF THE PASSENGER CARS INCLUDED IN THIS CAMPAIGN WILL BE INSTRUCTED TO RETURN THEIR VEHICLES TO THEIR DEALERS TO HAVE THE SPEED CONTROL DEACTIVATION SWITCH DISCONNECTED AS AN INTERIM REPAIR. AS SOON AS REPAIR PARTS ARE AVAILABLE (EXPECTED OCTOBER 2007), OWNERS WILL BE INSTRUCTED TO RETURN TO THE DEALERS FOR INSTALLATION OF A FUSED WIRING HARNESS. THE RECALL BEGAN ON AUGUST 13, 2007, AND MAILING COMPLETED BY SEPTEMBER 19, 2007. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-888-222-2751.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

2

EA96019 · Headlight Failure

Opened Jul 31, 1996 · Closed Jan 26, 1998

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Exterior Lighting

EXCESSIVE HEAT IN AN IMPROPERLY MANUFACTURED CIRCUIT BREAKER WITHIN THE HEADLIGHT SWITCH CAUSED THAT CIRCUIT BREAKER TO OPEN FOR TIME PERIODS OF VARYING LENGTH TO COOL OFF.OPENING OF THE CIRCUIT BREAKER IN THIS MANNER INTERRUPTS ELECTRIC CURRENT FLOW TO THE HEADLIGHTS, SHUTTING THEM OFF.HEADLIGHT OUTAGES HAVE RANGER FROM BRIEF FLICKERS (LESS THAN ONE SECOND) TO GREATER THAN 20 SECONDS.OVER TIME, THE OUTAGES GROW IN LENGTH AND DURATION BECAUSE OF HEAT-INDUCED DETERIORATION OF THE SWITCH AND ASSOCIATED WIRING.RECALL 98V-009 WILL APPLY TO APPROXIMATELY 506,000 TAURUS, SABLE, MARK VIII, AND CONTINENTAL VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM 1-DEC.-92 THROUGH 30-SEP-93 AT THE ATLANTA, CHICAGO,AND WIXOM ASSEMBLY PLANTS.87% OF MY 1992-1995 TAURUS/SABLE AND 97% OF MY 1993-1995 MARK VIII WARRANTY REPAIRS (HEADLIGHT SWITCH REPLACEMENT) INVOLVED VEHICLES BUILT DURING THE DEC. 92 - OCT. 93 BUILD RANGE.

PE95007 · Brake Pedal Separation From Pivot Arm

Opened Feb 1, 1995 · Closed May 4, 1995

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic

There is no summary currently available