← New search

2006 Lexus Is 250

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Is 250 years

Owner complaints for the 2006 Lexus Is 250 are substantially higher than the model-year median of 35.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

139 reports with mileage · 50 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Structure. Review the 53 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Air Bags. Review the 46 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Engine. Review the 19 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

10 crash reports3 fire reports11 injury reports

What owners actually said

189 reports
35,000 miles · Sep 30, 2009
Vehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2006 LEXUS IS 250. WHILE DRIVING 50 MPH THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL WAS STUCK UNDER THE FLOOR MAT. AS A CONSEQUENCE, HE HAD TO SHIFT THE VEHICLE INTO PARK TO DECELERATE WHICH CAUSED A TRUCK TO CRASH INTO THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS EXTENSIVELY DAMAGED. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. AN AUTHORIZED TECHNICI…

Read full complaint

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2006 LEXUS IS 250. WHILE DRIVING 50 MPH THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL WAS STUCK UNDER THE FLOOR MAT. AS A CONSEQUENCE, HE HAD TO SHIFT THE VEHICLE INTO PARK TO DECELERATE WHICH CAUSED A TRUCK TO CRASH INTO THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS EXTENSIVELY DAMAGED. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. AN AUTHORIZED TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THE FAILURE WAS NOT CAUSED BY A DEFECT. THE VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 35000. UPDATED 10/13/09. *LJ UPDATED 10/14/09

NHTSA ODI #10285810

45,000 miles · Sep 2, 2009
StructureInjury

I HAD A CAR ACCIDENT LAST FRIDAY ON HIGHWAY 75, AT APPROXIMATELY THE 248.7 MARK. I WAS GOING AT THE SPEED LIMIT, AND ALL OF A SUDDEN THE FRONT WHEEL CAME OFF FROM AXLE END AND HIT DIVIDER WALL ON THE INTERSTATE. I LOST CONTROL OF THE CAR AND BUMPED MY HEAD ON THE GLASS. MY INSURANCE COMPANY AND THE POLICE TOLD ME THAT I DON'T N…

Read full complaint

I HAD A CAR ACCIDENT LAST FRIDAY ON HIGHWAY 75, AT APPROXIMATELY THE 248.7 MARK. I WAS GOING AT THE SPEED LIMIT, AND ALL OF A SUDDEN THE FRONT WHEEL CAME OFF FROM AXLE END AND HIT DIVIDER WALL ON THE INTERSTATE. I LOST CONTROL OF THE CAR AND BUMPED MY HEAD ON THE GLASS. MY INSURANCE COMPANY AND THE POLICE TOLD ME THAT I DON'T NEED TO FILE REPORT SINCE NO OTHER PARTY WAS INVOLVED. I WOULD TO ATTACHED SOME PICTURES OF THE VEHICLE TAKEN AFTER THE ACCIDENT IF POSSIBLE. YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE ALL OF 5 BOLTS ARE STILL ATTACHED ON THE TIRES . IT IS VERY FRUSTRATING AND ASTONISHING THAT A HIGHLY REPUTABLE CAR MAKER WOULD HAVE ALLOWED SUCH POOR QUALITY ON THE BODY STRUCTURE. THERE WAS NO SIDE COLLISION AT THAT TIME, AND I WHEN THE TIRE CAME OFF LOOSE IT SCRATCHED AND MADE DAMAGES TO THE CAR. CURRENTLY MY CAR IS AT DEALER SHOP, WAITING FOR INSPECTION. I SINCERELY HOPE LEXUS OR NHTSA CAN START INVESTIGATING ON THIS MATTER AND PROVIDE ME AN EXPLANATION. NEEDLESS TO SAY, THIS IS A VERY SERIOUS SAFETY ISSUE. NO CAR OWNER WOULD HAVE EXPECTED ANY PART OF THEIR CAR TO BE DETACHED WHILE ON THE ROAD WITH NO REASON. IF YOU NEED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT ME. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10282618

69,000 miles · Aug 27, 2009
Structure

2006 LEXUS IS 250 AWD WITH JUST UNDER 70K MILES- NOTICED THAT CARPETING WAS SOAKING WET, WITH SIGNIFICANT WATER IN REAR PASSENGER AREA. TOOK CAR TO DEALERSHIP WHO SAID THAT THE A/C DRAIN HOSE WAS BLOCKED. LEXUS HAS A TSB WITH A NEW AND IMPROVED DRAIN HOSE, BUT THEY DID NOT COVER AS CAR WAS NO LONGER UNDER WARRANTY AND THEY REFU…

Read full complaint

2006 LEXUS IS 250 AWD WITH JUST UNDER 70K MILES- NOTICED THAT CARPETING WAS SOAKING WET, WITH SIGNIFICANT WATER IN REAR PASSENGER AREA. TOOK CAR TO DEALERSHIP WHO SAID THAT THE A/C DRAIN HOSE WAS BLOCKED. LEXUS HAS A TSB WITH A NEW AND IMPROVED DRAIN HOSE, BUT THEY DID NOT COVER AS CAR WAS NO LONGER UNDER WARRANTY AND THEY REFUSED TO ADMIT THAT THE PART WAS DEFECTIVE. COST TO REPLACE DRAIN HOSE (1700) AND REPLACE CARPET (2200) FOR A TOTAL OF 3900. LEXUS AGREED TO PAY 50% AS A GOODWILL GESTURE, BUT REFUSED TO ADMIT DESIGN DEFECT. I DISAGREE WITH THEIR ASSERTION. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10281942

Mileage unknown · Aug 23, 2009
Structure

MY CAR WAS DAMAGED BY SHIPPING COMPANY (MOMENTUM TRANSPORT) DURING SHIPMENT FROM TX TO VA. DAMAGE WAS DONE TO THE FRONT BUMPER AND REAR BUMPER. I CONTACTED THE COMPANY AFTER RECEIVING THE CAR AND WAS ASKED TO SEND PICS OF THE DAMAGE. I EMAILED PICS OF THE CAR BEFORE SHIPPING AND PICS OF DAMAGE AFTER SHIPPING AND HAVE NOT HEARD F…

Read full complaint

MY CAR WAS DAMAGED BY SHIPPING COMPANY (MOMENTUM TRANSPORT) DURING SHIPMENT FROM TX TO VA. DAMAGE WAS DONE TO THE FRONT BUMPER AND REAR BUMPER. I CONTACTED THE COMPANY AFTER RECEIVING THE CAR AND WAS ASKED TO SEND PICS OF THE DAMAGE. I EMAILED PICS OF THE CAR BEFORE SHIPPING AND PICS OF DAMAGE AFTER SHIPPING AND HAVE NOT HEARD FROM MOMENTUM TRANSPORT SINCE. I HAVE CALLED AND LEFT SEVERAL MESSAGES AND SENT EMAIL AND THE COMPANY CONTINUES TO IGNORE ME. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10281456

42,000 miles · Mar 16, 2009
Engine And Engine Cooling

CAR STARTED TO RUN ROUGH, SLOWED DOWN, CHECK ENGINE LIGHT AND SBS LIGHT CAME ON (ITHOUGHT IT WAS AN OXYGEN SENSOR). BOOK SAYS TO TAKE TO DEALER IMMEDIATELY. I TOOK IT IN, THEY DID A CHECK, TOLD ME IT WAS A 'LOOSE GAS CAP'. A MONTH LATER - SAME THING HAPPENED. I TOOK IT BACK, THEY KEPT THE CAR FOR TWO WEEKS - TOLD ME THE VALVE SP…

Read full complaint

CAR STARTED TO RUN ROUGH, SLOWED DOWN, CHECK ENGINE LIGHT AND SBS LIGHT CAME ON (ITHOUGHT IT WAS AN OXYGEN SENSOR). BOOK SAYS TO TAKE TO DEALER IMMEDIATELY. I TOOK IT IN, THEY DID A CHECK, TOLD ME IT WAS A 'LOOSE GAS CAP'. A MONTH LATER - SAME THING HAPPENED. I TOOK IT BACK, THEY KEPT THE CAR FOR TWO WEEKS - TOLD ME THE VALVE SPRINGS WERE NOT THE CORRECT LENGTH AND HAD TO BE REPLACED. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10261991

31,200 miles · Jan 12, 2009
Service Brakes, HydraulicVehicle Speed ControlCrashFire

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2006 LEXUS IS250. WHILE DRIVING 50 MPH, THE VEHICLE BEGAN ACCELERATING ON ITS OWN TO 80 MPH. THE VEHICLE FAILED TO COMPLETELY SLOW DOWN WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED. THE CONTACT WAS ABLE TO KEEP THE SPEED AT APPROXIMATELY 50 MPH; HOWEVER, THE VEHICLE WAS CONTINUOUSLY ACCELERATING TO HIGHER SPEEDS. …

Read full complaint

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2006 LEXUS IS250. WHILE DRIVING 50 MPH, THE VEHICLE BEGAN ACCELERATING ON ITS OWN TO 80 MPH. THE VEHICLE FAILED TO COMPLETELY SLOW DOWN WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED. THE CONTACT WAS ABLE TO KEEP THE SPEED AT APPROXIMATELY 50 MPH; HOWEVER, THE VEHICLE WAS CONTINUOUSLY ACCELERATING TO HIGHER SPEEDS. SHE WAS UNABLE TO SLOW THE VEHICLE DOWN AND CRASHED INTO A CURVE. THE CONTACT NOTICED THAT THE ROTORS WERE ORANGE AND THE REAR BRAKE PADS WERE MELTED INTO THE ROTORS. THE AXLE FAILED AND FRACTURED. THE CONTACT WAS NOT INJURED. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED AND THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THEY WOULD SEND A FIELD INSPECTOR TO INSPECT THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 31,200.

NHTSA ODI #10254688

30,100 miles · Jul 15, 2008
Latches/locks/linkages

THE ELECTRONIC KEY SOMEHOW LOCKED THE DOORS WITH THE KEY INSIDE. I OPENED UP THE FRONT PASSENGER DOOR, WHICH UNLOCKS ALL THE DOORS, SET MY PURSE WITH THE ELECTRONIC KEY ON THE FRONT SEAT, CLOSED THAT DOOR, OPENED THE BACK DOOR, PUT MY 15 MONTH-OLD GRANDDAUGHTER IN HER CAR SEAT, CLOSED HER DOOR, AND HEARD ALL THE DOORS LOCK. ON…

Read full complaint

THE ELECTRONIC KEY SOMEHOW LOCKED THE DOORS WITH THE KEY INSIDE. I OPENED UP THE FRONT PASSENGER DOOR, WHICH UNLOCKS ALL THE DOORS, SET MY PURSE WITH THE ELECTRONIC KEY ON THE FRONT SEAT, CLOSED THAT DOOR, OPENED THE BACK DOOR, PUT MY 15 MONTH-OLD GRANDDAUGHTER IN HER CAR SEAT, CLOSED HER DOOR, AND HEARD ALL THE DOORS LOCK. ONE OF THE SAFETY FEATURES OF THIS CAR IS THAT YOU ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE ABLE TO LOCK YOUR KEYS INSIDE. WE HAD TO CALL THE POLICE, AND THEY HAD TO BREAK A WINDOW TO GET THE CAR OPEN. IT WAS ABOUT 90 DEGREES OUTSIDE, AND SHE HAD BEEN IN THERE FOR ABOUT 12 MINUTES. LEXUS HAS NO IDEA WHY THIS OCCURRED, NOR ARE THEY TAKING FULL RESPONSIBILITY TO FIX MY DAMAGED WINDOWS--ONE IS BROKEN AND SEVERAL OTHERS ARE CHIPPED. THEY ARE "GOOD WILLING THE PARTS" ON THE BROKEN WINDOW. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10234445

22,500 miles · May 29, 2007
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

IN NOVEMBER 2006 I PURCHASED A NEW LEXUS IS250. I HAVE TAKEN IT TO A LEXUS DEALER FOR ALL SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE. THE LAST TIME THEY ROTATED THE TIRES. RIGHT AFTER THAT I NOTICED A 'NOISE' WITH THE BRAKES. AT THE NEXT SERVICE (22,500 MI) THEY ARE TELLING ME THAT THE ROTORS HAVE TO BE REPLACED AND THAT I SHOULD EXPECT THAT AGAIN I…

Read full complaint

IN NOVEMBER 2006 I PURCHASED A NEW LEXUS IS250. I HAVE TAKEN IT TO A LEXUS DEALER FOR ALL SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE. THE LAST TIME THEY ROTATED THE TIRES. RIGHT AFTER THAT I NOTICED A 'NOISE' WITH THE BRAKES. AT THE NEXT SERVICE (22,500 MI) THEY ARE TELLING ME THAT THE ROTORS HAVE TO BE REPLACED AND THAT I SHOULD EXPECT THAT AGAIN IN 20,000 MILES. I AM NOT AN AGGRESSIVE DRIVER. I HAD MY LAST CAR (MERCEDES) FOR 10+ YEARS WITH ZERO PROBLEMS WITH ROTORS. THIS SEEMS UNREASONABLE ON A NEW CAR. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10191917

30,000 miles · Apr 6, 2007
Fuel System, GasolineInjury

ON APRIL 3, 2007 I TOOK MY 2006 LEXUS IS 250 AUTOMOBILE TO MY DEALER OF PURCHASE FOR DIAGNOSIS AFTER THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON THE DASHBOARD. DEALER PERFORMED ELECTRONIC TESTS ON THE CAR ON APRIL 4, 2007, AND DETERMINED THE PRIMARY ELECTRONIC GASOLINE FUEL PUMP WAS BAD , NOT SENDING ENOUGH PRESSURE AND FAULTY ELECTRICAL CON…

Read full complaint

ON APRIL 3, 2007 I TOOK MY 2006 LEXUS IS 250 AUTOMOBILE TO MY DEALER OF PURCHASE FOR DIAGNOSIS AFTER THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON THE DASHBOARD. DEALER PERFORMED ELECTRONIC TESTS ON THE CAR ON APRIL 4, 2007, AND DETERMINED THE PRIMARY ELECTRONIC GASOLINE FUEL PUMP WAS BAD , NOT SENDING ENOUGH PRESSURE AND FAULTY ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS. THE CAR IS 1 YEAR OLD AND HAS 30,000 MILES. THAT A PRIMARY GASOLINE FUEL PUMP WOULD GO BAD IN THE FIRST 30,000 MILES IS VERY RARE AND WORRISOME. AFTER PICKING UP MY CAR FROM SERVICE ON APRIL 4TH, I NOTICED A STRONG ODOR OF GASOLINE RAW FUEL FUMES WERE INSIDE THE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT AND IN THE REAR TRUNK OF THE CAR. I INFORMED THE AUTO DEALERSHIP SERVICE ADVISORS ON DUTY AT THE TIME OF PICKUP OF THE AUTOMOBILE, AND THEY STATED THAT BECAUSE THE FUEL PUMP THAT WAS REPLACED IS LOCATED INSIDE THE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT AND UNDERNEATH THE REAR PASSENGER SEAT, PERHAPS A SMALL AMOUNT OF FUEL HAD BEEN SPILLED INSIDE THE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT DURING THE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW FUEL PUMP. I WAS TOLD NO PROBLEM AND THAT THE SMELL OF RAW FUEL WOULD GO AWAY. I DROVE 14 MILES ON MY WAY HOME AND DECIDED TO FILL UP MY GAS TANK WITH 6 GALLONS OF FUEL. ONCE I FILLED THE GAS TANK WITH ADDITIONAL FUEL, THE SMELL OF INCREASING RAW FUEL FILLED THE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT. FOR FEAR OF A FIRE OR EXPLOSION OF THE RAW FUEL FUMES, I HAD THE CAR TOWED BACK TO THE DEALERSHIP, SEWELL LEXUS OF DALLAS, TEXAS. THE DEALERSHIP ON APRIL 5TH BEGAN TO DIAGNOSE THE PROBLEM AGAIN, BUT HAS NOT YET BEEN ABLE TO IDENTIFY THE SOURCE OF THE RAW GASOLINE FUEL FUMES THAT INCREASE IN THE ENGINE COMPARTMENT WHEN THE VEHICLE IS TURNED ON AND ACCELERATING. THIS DANGEROUS CONDITION WITH RAW GASOLINE FUEL FUMES COULD CAUSE A FIRE OR EXPLOSION THAT WOULD KILL ME AND THE OCCUPANTS OF THE CAR. AS A RESULT OF THE FUEL FUMES, I AND MY PASSENGER ON APRIL 5TH, HAVE ENDURED MIGRAINE HEADACHES AND DIZZINESS AFTER INGESTION THE RAW FUEL FUMES. *AK

NHTSA ODI #10187172

Mileage unknown · Mar 8, 2007
Visibility

ON JUNE 20, 2006, I BOUGHT A 2006 LEXUS IS250 AWD. MY PURCHASE WAS BASED ON THE EXCELLENT REPUTATION OF LEXUS AND THE OUTSTANDING REVIEWS OF THIS MODEL IN PARTICULAR. I HAVE BEEN GREATLY DISAPPOINTED ON BOTH COUNTS. I DISCOVERED THAT WHEN THE MOON ROOF IS OPEN, THE REARVIEW MIRROR VIBRATES SO DRAMATICALLY THAT IT IS USELESS AN…

Read full complaint

ON JUNE 20, 2006, I BOUGHT A 2006 LEXUS IS250 AWD. MY PURCHASE WAS BASED ON THE EXCELLENT REPUTATION OF LEXUS AND THE OUTSTANDING REVIEWS OF THIS MODEL IN PARTICULAR. I HAVE BEEN GREATLY DISAPPOINTED ON BOTH COUNTS. I DISCOVERED THAT WHEN THE MOON ROOF IS OPEN, THE REARVIEW MIRROR VIBRATES SO DRAMATICALLY THAT IT IS USELESS AND AS A RESULT CREATES AN UNSAFE DRIVING CONDITION. I IMMEDIATELY REPORTED THIS TO THE DEALERSHIP WHERE I BOUGHT THE CAR (RAMSEY) AND WAS ASKED TO BRING THE CAR IN FOR THEIR INSPECTION. ON 9/21/06, I DID AND WHEN I RETURNED TO PICK UP THE CAR, I WAS TOLD IT WAS FIXED. WHEN I DROVE OUT, THE SAME CONDITION EXISTED. I SPOKE WITH THE SERVICE MANAGER. I BROUGHT THE CAR BACK ON 10/9 AND THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT WAS UNABLE TO RESOLVE THE PROBLEM. I SPOKE WITH THE SERVICE MANAGER AGAIN HIS RECOMMENDATION WAS TO GIVE HIM TIME TO RESEARCH THE PROBLEM WITH LEXUS HEADQUARTERS ENGINEERING AND SINCE I NEEDED TO BRING THE CAR FOR ROUTINE SERVICE IN THREE MONTHS, I COULD BRING IT BACK AND HE WOULD HAVE THE RESOLUTION THEN. ON 1/19/07, I DID RETURN THE CAR FOR ROUTINE SERVICE AND TO HAVE THE MIRROR VIBRATION REMEDIED. ALTHOUGH THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT ATTEMPTED SOME OTHER "FIX", THE MIRROR REMAINS THE SAME. I WAS SUBSEQUENTLY TOLD BY THE SERVICE MANAGER THAT THERE ISN'T A WAY TO FIX THIS PROBLEM AND THAT I WASN'T THE ONLY OWNER EXPERIENCING THIS. I WAS TOLD THAT THE ENGINEERS WERE WORKING ON IT. WHEN I ASKED HOW LONG THIS WOULD TAKE, I WAS TOLD IT COULD BE TWO MONTHS OR A YEAR. HE HAD NO WAY OF KNOWING. I THEN CALLED LEXUS HEADQUARTERS CUSTOMER SERVICE ON 2/11 TO VOICE MY COMPLAINT. THE COMPANY RESPONSE WAS THAT THERE IS NO SOLUTION TO MY PROBLEM AND THAT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IS AWARE OF THE PROBLEM BUT HAVE NO TIME FRAME FOR A SOLUTION. I WANTED TO MAKE YOU AWARE OF THIS SERIOUS SAFETY ISSUE WITH THE 2006 LEXUS IS 250 AWD. *JB

NHTSA ODI #10184499

Official recalls

6

19V741000 · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module; Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

Oct 17, 2019

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2010-2016 4Runner, 2003-2006 Tundra, 2003-2013 Corolla, 2009-2010 Corolla Matrix, 2004-2005 RAV4, 2002-2007 Sequoia, 2011-2013 Sienna, 2008-2012 Scion xB, 2008-2009 Lexus IS-F, 2007-2012 Yaris and Lexus ES350, 2010-2017 Lexus GX460, 2002-2010 Lexus SC430, 2006-2012 Lexus IS250 and IS350 and 2010-2015 Lexus IS250C and IS350C vehicles. These vehicles had their driver or passenger frontal air bag inflators previously replaced under a prior recall using inflators of the same design. The inflators may explode due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to high absolute humidity, temperature and temperature cycling.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An inflator explosion may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners. Depending on the vehicle model, dealers will replace the front driver inflator, front passenger airbag inflator, the airbag assembly, or the front passenger airbag sub-assembly and inflator. The recall began November 20, 2019. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-888-270-9371 or Lexus customer service at 1-800-255-3987. Toyota's numbers for this recall are J0A, J0B, and J0C. Lexus' numbers for this recall are JLI, JLJ, and JLK.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2010-2016 4Runner, 2003-2006 Tundra, 2003-2013 Corolla, 2009-2010 Corolla Matrix, 2004-2005 RAV4, 2002-2007 Sequoia, 2011-2013 Sienna, 2008-2012 Scion xB, 2008-2009 Lexus IS-F, 2007-2012 Yaris and Lexus ES350, 2010-2017 Lexus GX460, 2002-2010 Lexus SC430, 2006-2012 Lexus IS250 and IS350 and 2010-2015 Lexus IS250C and IS350C vehicles. These vehicles had their driver or passenger frontal air bag inflators previously replaced under a prior recall using inflators of the same design. The inflators may explode due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to high absolute humidity, temperature and temperature cycling.

Consequence: An inflator explosion may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners. Depending on the vehicle model, dealers will replace the front driver inflator, front passenger airbag inflator, the airbag assembly, or the front passenger airbag sub-assembly and inflator. The recall began November 20, 2019. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-888-270-9371 or Lexus customer service at 1-800-255-3987. Toyota's numbers for this recall are J0A, J0B, and J0C. Lexus' numbers for this recall are JLI, JLJ, and JLK.

Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2010-2016 4Runner, 2003-2006 Tundra, 2003-2013 Corolla, 2009-2010 Corolla Matrix, 2004-2005 RAV4, 2002-2007 Sequoia, 2011-2013 Sienna, 2008-2012 Scion xB, 2008-2009 Lexus IS-F, 2007-2012 Yaris and Lexus ES350, 2010-2017 Lexus GX460, 2002-2010 Lexus SC430, 2006-2012 Lexus IS250 and IS350 and 2010-2015 Lexus IS250C and IS350C vehicles. These vehicles had their driver or passenger frontal air bag inflators previously replaced under a prior recall using inflators of the same design. The inflators may explode due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to high absolute humidity, temperature and temperature cycling.

Consequence: An inflator explosion may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners. Depending on the vehicle model, dealers will replace the front driver inflator, front passenger airbag inflator, the airbag assembly, or the front passenger airbag sub-assembly and inflator. The recall began November 20, 2019. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-888-270-9371 or Lexus customer service at 1-800-255-3987. Toyota's numbers for this recall are J0A, J0B, and J0C. Lexus' numbers for this recall are JLI, JLJ, and JLK.

17V006000 · Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

Jan 9, 2017

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2012 Toyota 4Runner, Corolla, Corolla Matrix, Sienna, Yaris, Scion xB, Lexus ES350, GX460, IS-F, IS250, IS350, IS250C, IS350C, and Lexus LFA vehicles originally sold, or ever registered, in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands (Saipan), and the U.S. Virgin Islands, or "Zone A." Additionally, unless included in "Zone A" above, Toyota is recalling certain 2009 Toyota Corolla, Corolla Matrix, Yaris, Yaris HB, Scion xB, Pontiac Vibe, Lexus, ES350, IS250, IS350, and IS-F vehicles originally sold, or ever registered, in Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, or "Zone B." Additionally, unless included in "Zone A" or "Zone B" above, Toyota is recalling certain 2006-2008 Lexus IS250 and IS350, 2007-2008 Lexus ES350, Toyota Yaris, Yaris HB, and 2008 Lexus IS-F and Scion xB vehicles originally sold, or ever registered in Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. These vehicles are equipped with certain air bag inflators assembled as part of the passenger frontal air bag modules used as original equipment or replacement equipment. In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the passenger frontal air bag, these inflators may rupture due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to absolute humidity and temperature cycling.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An inflator rupture may result in metal fragments striking the vehicle occupants resulting in serious injury or death.

Remedy: Toyota will notify the Toyota, Scion and Lexus owners. General Motors will contact the Pontiac owners. Depending on the model, dealers will replace the passenger frontal air bag inflator or the air bag assembly, free of charge. The recall began on February 1, 2017. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331, or Pontiac customer service at 1-800-762-2737. Toyota's numbers for final remedy for this campaign are G0P (Toyota Zone A), G0R (Toyota Zone B), H0A (Toyota Zone C), GLG (Lexus Zone A), GLH (Lexus Zone B) and HLA (Lexus Zone C).

16V340000 · Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

May 23, 2016

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2008-2011 Scion xB and Lexus IS F, 2009-2011 Toyota Corolla and Corolla Matrix, 2006-2011 Toyota Yaris, Lexus IS250 and Lexus IS350, 2010-2011 Toyota 4Runner, Lexus IS250C, Lexus IS350C and Lexus GX460, 2011 Sienna, 2007-2011 Lexus ES350, and 2009-2010 Pontiac Vibe vehicles, originally sold, or ever registered, in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands (Saipan), and the U.S. Virgin Islands, or "Zone A." Additionally, unless included in "Zone A" above, Toyota is recalling certain model year 2008 Scion xB and Lexus IS F, 2007-2008 Toyota Yaris, 2006-2008 Lexus IS250 and Lexus IS350 and 2007-2008 Lexus ES350 vehicles, originally sold, or ever registered, in Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, or "Zone B." Vehicles of these model years and models that were not originally sold or ever registered in either Zones A or B are not subject to this safety recall. These vehicles are equipped with certain air bag inflators assembled as part of the passenger frontal air bag modules, and used as original equipment or replacement equipment. In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the front air bags, these inflators may rupture due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to absolute humidity and temperature cycling.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An inflator rupture may result in metal fragments striking the vehicle occupants resulting in serious injury or death.

Remedy: Toyota will notify the Toyota and Lexus owners. General Motors will contact the Pontiac owners. Depending on the model, dealers will replace the passenger frontal air bag inflator or the air bag assembly, free of charge. The recall began on December 6, 2016. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331. Toyota's numbers for interim notification for this campaign are G1P (Toyota Zone A), G1R (Toyota Zone B), G2G (Lexus Zone A), and G2H (Lexus Zone B). Toyota's numbers for final remedy for this campaign are G0P (Toyota Zone A), G0R (Toyota Zone B), GLG (Lexus Zone A), and GLH (Lexus Zone B).

14V647000 · Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:hoses, Lines/piping, And Fittings

Oct 15, 2014

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2007-2010 Lexus LS vehicles manufactured May 9, 2006, to July 20, 2010, 2006-2011 Lexus GS vehicles manufactured January 6, 2005, to September 10, 2010, and 2006-2011 Lexus IS vehicles manufactured August 30, 2005, to September 10, 2010. Due to anti-corrosion plating remnants, fuel may leak from where the fuel pressure sensor is attached to the fuel delivery pipe.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source increases the risk of a fire.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will clean and reseal the fuel pressure sensor mounting area, free of charge. The recall began March 3, 2015. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331.

13V030000 · Visibility/wiper

Jan 30, 2013

Toyota is recalling certain model year 2006-2012 Lexus IS250 and IS350 vehicles manufactured August 23, 2005, through October 5, 2011; 2010-2012 Lexus IS250C and IS350C vehicles manufactured April 10, 2009, through October 6, 2011; and 2008-2011 Lexus IS-F vehicles manufactured December 14, 2007, through July 10, 2011. The nuts that fasten the wiper arms may be insufficiently torqued such that if the wiper arms are restricted by an external load, such as a buildup of heavy snow, one or both of the wipers may become inoperative.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Inoperative wipers could reduce driver visibility and increase the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Toyota will notify owners, and Lexus dealers will install new wiper arm nuts, free of charge. An interim letter was mailed to owners on April 4, 2013. Owners may contact Toyota at 1-800-331-4331.

05V565000 · Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

Dec 19, 2005

ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES, THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY TEMPORARILY BECOME STUCK IN THE PARTIALLY DEPRESSED POSITION DUE TO INADEQUATE CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL LINKAGE AND A PLASTIC PAD EMBEDDED INTO THE VEHICLE'S CARPET.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: THIS CONDITION MAY INTERFERE WITH THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL RETURNING TO THE IDLE POSITION, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE CLEARANCE OF THE ACCELERATION PEDAL AND CARPET, REPLACE THE PEDAL ASSEMBLY WITH A REVISED ASSEMBLY, AND MODIFY THE CARPET FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON DECEMBER 27, 2005. OWNERS MAY CONTACT LEXUS AT 1-800-255-3987.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

EA21002 · Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture

Opened Sep 17, 2021 · No close date supplied

Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module; Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.