← New search

2011 Hyundai Genesis

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2011 Hyundai Genesis do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 109.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

99 reports with mileage · 23 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Electrical System. Review the 19 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Vehicle Speed Control. Review the 16 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 15 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

12 crash reports3 fire reports6 injury reports

What owners actually said

122 reports
25,000 miles · Oct 31, 2014
Service BrakesSteeringVehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury

I WAS DRIVING AT 35 MPH IN THE LANE, THE CAR ON THE LEFT LANE HIT THE REAR BODY AND TIRE OF DRIVER SIDE, BUT THE CAR DIDN'T STOP EVEN AFTER THE IMPACT. AFTER THE COLLISION, I PRESSED VERY HARD ON THE BRAKE PEDAL TO STOP, BUT IT KEPT MOVING, EVEN INCREASED ITS SPEED UP TO 60 MPH, AND TURNED INTO THE DIFFERENT DIRECTION. ALSO THE…

Read full complaint

I WAS DRIVING AT 35 MPH IN THE LANE, THE CAR ON THE LEFT LANE HIT THE REAR BODY AND TIRE OF DRIVER SIDE, BUT THE CAR DIDN'T STOP EVEN AFTER THE IMPACT. AFTER THE COLLISION, I PRESSED VERY HARD ON THE BRAKE PEDAL TO STOP, BUT IT KEPT MOVING, EVEN INCREASED ITS SPEED UP TO 60 MPH, AND TURNED INTO THE DIFFERENT DIRECTION. ALSO THE WHEEL WAS STUCK BY ITSELF AND I WAS NOT ABLE TO TURN ANYWHERE WITH MY HANDS. IT WENT OFF THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROAD WITHOUT ANY CONTROL. 20 YEARS OLD TOYOTA CAMRY WAS ABLE TO STOP AT THE SPOT OF COLLISION, BUT HYUNDAI GENESIS COULDN'T. THE WHEEL AND THE BRAKE WERE BOTH STUCK AND UNABLE TO BE CONTROLLED AND CRASHED INTO THE ELECTRIC POLE. THE AIR BAG WAS DEPLOYED, AND HYUNDAI GENESIS WAS TOTALED. IN 2014, THE BRAKE RECALL SERVICE WAS RECEIVED TWO TIMES FROM THE DEALER. THERE MUST BE THE MECHANICAL FAILURE IN THE BRAKE, SPEED CONTROL, AND THE WHEEL WHICH CAUSED THIS TOTAL LOSS. I WAS INJURED AND TAKEN BY THE AMBULANCE LATER. I NEVER HAD ANY ACCIDENTS LIKE THIS BEFORE WITH ANY OTHER CARS! *TR

NHTSA ODI #10651755

31,060 miles · Oct 3, 2014
Engine And Engine Cooling

I DROVE FROM PALM SPRINGS, CA TO SANTA MONICA, CA. MY AIR CONDITIONING WAS WORKING FINE. TWO DAYS LATER AFTER DRIVING AROUND SANTA MONICA MY AIR CONDITIONER DIDN'T WORK ANY LONGER. I DROVE BACK TO PALM SPRINGS AND WENT TO THE DEALER IMMEDIATELY. THEY DIAGNOSED MY CAR BY FRIDAY, OCTOBER 2,2012 AND TOLD ME THEIR WAS A HOLE IN …

Read full complaint

I DROVE FROM PALM SPRINGS, CA TO SANTA MONICA, CA. MY AIR CONDITIONING WAS WORKING FINE. TWO DAYS LATER AFTER DRIVING AROUND SANTA MONICA MY AIR CONDITIONER DIDN'T WORK ANY LONGER. I DROVE BACK TO PALM SPRINGS AND WENT TO THE DEALER IMMEDIATELY. THEY DIAGNOSED MY CAR BY FRIDAY, OCTOBER 2,2012 AND TOLD ME THEIR WAS A HOLE IN MY CONDENSER AND IT WAS NOT THEIR FAULT. IT WAS NOT COVERED BY THE WARRANTY. NEEDLESS TO SAY, I FEEL THAT EITHER THE GRILL OR DESIGN IS A DEFECT AND SHOULD NOT BE CHARGED. I TAKE EXCELLENT CARE OF MY CAR AND THERE HAS BEEN NO ACCIDENTS. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10641308

Mileage unknown · Sep 24, 2014
Tires

I BOUGHT 4 NEW MICHELIN PILOT SPORT A/S PLUS EARLY LAST YEAR. I HAVE PUT APPROXIMATELY 30K MILES ON THEM. I BROUGHT MY CAR INTO MY TIRE SHOP AND THE MANAGER TOLD ME MICHELIN WAS OFFERING MONEY TO REPLACE THE TIRES. I ASKED IF IT WAS A RECALL AND HE TOLD ME THAT IT WAS NOT. HE INSPECTED MY TIRES AND SHOWED ME THE TIRES WERE A…

Read full complaint

I BOUGHT 4 NEW MICHELIN PILOT SPORT A/S PLUS EARLY LAST YEAR. I HAVE PUT APPROXIMATELY 30K MILES ON THEM. I BROUGHT MY CAR INTO MY TIRE SHOP AND THE MANAGER TOLD ME MICHELIN WAS OFFERING MONEY TO REPLACE THE TIRES. I ASKED IF IT WAS A RECALL AND HE TOLD ME THAT IT WAS NOT. HE INSPECTED MY TIRES AND SHOWED ME THE TIRES WERE ACTUALLY FLAKING AND I COULD SEE TIRE CORDS SHOWING ON CERTAIN PARTS OF THE OUTER EDGE. I LOOKED UP TO SEE IF THERE IS A RECALL ON THE TIRE AND I COULD NOT FIND ANY MENTION OF THIS TIRE. WHY NOT? HUGE SAFETY CONCERN THAT HAS NOT YET BEEN ADDRESSED AND VERY FRUSTRATING TO THINK ACTION IS NOT BEING TAKEN. WAKE UP FOLKS!! I CANNOT BE THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS COMPLAINED. I WENT ONTO THE MICHELIN WEBSITE AND SAW NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS SIMILAR TO MINE ON THEIR SITE. WHAT DOES IT TAKE? A FATALITY BEFORE YOU "SPRING" INTO ACTION? *TR

NHTSA ODI #10638778

25,883 miles · Aug 24, 2014
Fuel System, GasolineVehicle Speed Control

CAR LOSS ALL FORWARD POWER, SPEED DROPPED TO 20 MPH ACCELERATOR HAD NO EFFECT. AFTER PULLING TO SIDE OF ROAD ENGINE WOULD NOT GO ABOVE 2000 RPM IN NEUTRAL. ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON, LIMPED TO DEALER. DEALER DIAGNOSED AS TROUBLE CODE C15, THROTTLE BODY ASSY. DEALER REPLACED THROTTLE BODY, DROVE CAR FOR 50 MILES IN 4 DAYS. NOW HAVE…

Read full complaint

CAR LOSS ALL FORWARD POWER, SPEED DROPPED TO 20 MPH ACCELERATOR HAD NO EFFECT. AFTER PULLING TO SIDE OF ROAD ENGINE WOULD NOT GO ABOVE 2000 RPM IN NEUTRAL. ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON, LIMPED TO DEALER. DEALER DIAGNOSED AS TROUBLE CODE C15, THROTTLE BODY ASSY. DEALER REPLACED THROTTLE BODY, DROVE CAR FOR 50 MILES IN 4 DAYS. NOW HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM, ENGINE LIGHT ON AND NO POWER. THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS PROBLEM. WILL HAVE CAR TOWED BACK TO DEALER. LOOSING POWER WITH NO WARNING WHILE DRIVING ON THE INTERSTATES OR PULLING OUT INTO TRAFFIC IS DANGEROUS AND SAFETY PROBLEM!!!!!!! *TR

NHTSA ODI #10627827

20,000 miles · Aug 21, 2014
Steering

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 HYUNDAI GENESIS. WHILE DRIVING 55 MPH, THE STEERING WHEEL SEIZED WITHOUT WARNING. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE THE TECHNICIAN DIAGNOSED THAT THE STEERING FAILED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 20,000.

NHTSA ODI #10627110

97,200 miles · Apr 14, 2014
EngineVehicle Speed Control

GOT JACKRABBIT YESTERDAY EVENING(APRL. 13 SUNDAY 2014, 6:30PM ). WHEN I TRIED EXIT TO ROADWAY FROM PARKING LOT, MOTOR REV UP BY ITSELF AND BREAK SYSTEM COULD NOT STOPPED VEHICLE COMPLETELY. I COULD HEAR THE SQUEAKING NOISE FROM BREAKS EVEN I PUSH THE BREAK PEDAL DEEP, I STILL WAS IN THE PARKINIG LOT AND COULD STEER ONTO EMPTY PA…

Read full complaint

GOT JACKRABBIT YESTERDAY EVENING(APRL. 13 SUNDAY 2014, 6:30PM ). WHEN I TRIED EXIT TO ROADWAY FROM PARKING LOT, MOTOR REV UP BY ITSELF AND BREAK SYSTEM COULD NOT STOPPED VEHICLE COMPLETELY. I COULD HEAR THE SQUEAKING NOISE FROM BREAKS EVEN I PUSH THE BREAK PEDAL DEEP, I STILL WAS IN THE PARKINIG LOT AND COULD STEER ONTO EMPTY PARKING SPACE AND SHIFTED LEVER TO "NEUTRAL" AND RIGHT AFTER THAT, MOTOR RPM JUMPED OVER 6000 WITH LOUD MOTOR NOISE. I SHOT OFF THE MOTOR AND A LITTLE LATER, REIGNITE OVER AND OVER, SAME THING HAPPENED. ABOUT 20 MINUTES LATER, SYMPTOM DISAPPEARED BY ITSELF. I THINK I WAS LUCKY BECAUSE I WAS NOT ON THE HIGHWAY. I VIDEO RECORDED THIS WITH MY SMART PHONE. * JS

NHTSA ODI #10579697

73,400 miles · Jan 31, 2014
Service Brakes

TWICE IN LAST MONTH I WAS DRIVING IN TRAFFIC AND HAD A TOTAL LOSS OF BRAKES ALMOST HITTING THE CAR DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF ME. I PUSHED THE BRAKE PEDAL IN BOTH CASES TO THE FLOOR AND MY CAR WAS NOT STOPPING. I WAS ABLE TO GET THE CAR TO FINALLY SLOW DOWN AFTER PUSHING THE PETAL AGAINST THE FLOOR AS HARD AS I COULD. NEEDLESS TO SAY …

Read full complaint

TWICE IN LAST MONTH I WAS DRIVING IN TRAFFIC AND HAD A TOTAL LOSS OF BRAKES ALMOST HITTING THE CAR DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF ME. I PUSHED THE BRAKE PEDAL IN BOTH CASES TO THE FLOOR AND MY CAR WAS NOT STOPPING. I WAS ABLE TO GET THE CAR TO FINALLY SLOW DOWN AFTER PUSHING THE PETAL AGAINST THE FLOOR AS HARD AS I COULD. NEEDLESS TO SAY THIS WAS A VERY FRIGHTENING EXPERIENCE BOTH TIMES. I TOOK THE VEHICLE IN TO THE DEALERSHIP AFTER RECEIVING A RECALL NOTICE IN THE MAIL. I WAS TOLD THAT THEY REPLACED THE BRAKE FLUID PER THE 114 RECALL AND THAT THEY WERE ABLE TO REPRODUCE THE STOPPING ISSUE. THE DEALERSHIP STATED THAT THE ABS MODULE WAS NOT OPERATING PROPERLY AND THAT IT WAS GOING TO BE A $2200 FIX THAT I WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING FOR AND THAT THE RECALL DID NOT COVER THE REQUIRED PARTS AND LABOR AND THAT THE WARRANTY AND EXTENDED WARRANTY THAT I HAVE WOULD NOT COVER THE REPAIRS. IT SEEMS THEY ONLY REPLACED THE FLUID THAT WAS CAUSING THE ISSUE WITH THE MODULE, BUT WOULD NOT TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR REPLACING THE CRITICAL PARTS THAT THE BRAKE FLUID COMPROMISED. I CAN NOT AFFORD TO FIX THIS CAR AND AM BEING TREATED LIKE IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO FIX THE ISSUE THEY CAUSED. I AM STILL DRIVING AN UNSAFE CAR BECAUSE I HAVE NO CHOICE. WHAT IS MY RECOURSE? *TR

NHTSA ODI #10562441

105,000 miles · Dec 3, 2013
Exterior Lighting

WHEN USING TURN SIGNAL AT NIGHT THE HEADLIGHTS TURN OFF FOR A FEW SECONDS. ITS DONE IT SINCE ALMOST NEW INTERMITTENTLY. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10554593

Mileage unknown · Nov 15, 2013
Service Brakes

WHEN THE BRAKE ASSIST SYSTEM IS ACTIVE AND THE CAR WAS STOPPED IT WOULD NOT MOVE AN INCH. NOW THE VEHICLE INCHES FORWARD AND MAKES A VIBRATION SOUND UNTIL EVENTUALLY THE DISC BRAKES LOCK UP AND THE CAR STOPS ROLLING. I TOOK MY CAR TO HYUNDAI OF ORANGE PARK AND SHOWED THE SERVICE WRITER THE ISSUE. WHEN THE CAR WAS RETURNED…

Read full complaint

WHEN THE BRAKE ASSIST SYSTEM IS ACTIVE AND THE CAR WAS STOPPED IT WOULD NOT MOVE AN INCH. NOW THE VEHICLE INCHES FORWARD AND MAKES A VIBRATION SOUND UNTIL EVENTUALLY THE DISC BRAKES LOCK UP AND THE CAR STOPS ROLLING. I TOOK MY CAR TO HYUNDAI OF ORANGE PARK AND SHOWED THE SERVICE WRITER THE ISSUE. WHEN THE CAR WAS RETURNED, THEY SAID THERE WAS NO PROBLEM. SINCE THIS HAS NEVER OCCURRED UNTIL RECENTLY, AND I HAVE OWNED THE CAR FOR 3 YEARS, THERE IS DEFINITELY AN ISSUE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10552395

59,101 miles · Aug 20, 2013
Vehicle Speed Control

TWICE TODAY, WHILE DRIVING IN STOP/GO TRAFFIC, THE CAR FELT AS IF IT WAS ACCELERATING ON ITS OWN. WHEN I TOOK THE FOOT OF THE BRAKE TO GO, THE CAR WOULD JOLT FORWARD ON ITS OWN. HAD TO PRESS THE BRAKE BERY HARD TO MAKE SURE IT WOULDNT GO BY ITSELF. I HAD TO PULL OVER, AFRAID I WOULD HIT CAR. WHEN I PUT IT ON NEUTRAL, THE ENGINE …

Read full complaint

TWICE TODAY, WHILE DRIVING IN STOP/GO TRAFFIC, THE CAR FELT AS IF IT WAS ACCELERATING ON ITS OWN. WHEN I TOOK THE FOOT OF THE BRAKE TO GO, THE CAR WOULD JOLT FORWARD ON ITS OWN. HAD TO PRESS THE BRAKE BERY HARD TO MAKE SURE IT WOULDNT GO BY ITSELF. I HAD TO PULL OVER, AFRAID I WOULD HIT CAR. WHEN I PUT IT ON NEUTRAL, THE ENGINE REVVED TO 3000RPMS AND IT STAYED THERE. MY FOOT WAS NOT ON THE GAS PEDAL AT ALL. WHEN I TRIED SHIFTING BACK TO DRIVE, IT JOLTED FORWARD. THE ONLY WAY TO GET IT TO STOP DOING THIS WAS TO TURN THE ENGINE OFF. AFTER THE FIRST TIME, I DROVE ABOUT 30 MIN IN 40MPH TRAFFIC, BEFORE IT DID IT AGAIN. AT TIMES THE CAR FELT LIKE IT DIDNT WANT TO ACCELERATE WHEN I WANTED TO. THEN AS TRAFFIC SLOWED DOWN, STARTED ACCELERATING ON ITS OWN AGAIN. THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME THIS HAPPENS. I BROUGHT THE CAR TO THE HYUNDAI DEALERSHIP SEVERAL MONTHS BACK FOR THE SAME ISSUE AND THEY SAID THEY FOUND NOTHING WRONG. SOMEONE NEEDS TO LOOK INTO THIS BEFORE SOMEONE GETS HURT. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10536316

Official recalls

3

14V713000 · Exterior Lighting:brake Lights:switch

Nov 7, 2014

Hyundai Motor America (Hyundai) is recalling certain 2009-2011 Hyundai Genesis vehicles manufactured April 30, 2008, to November 21, 2010, and 2011 Hyundai Equus vehicles manufactured July 31, 2010, to November 21, 2010. Due to a circuit failure, the stop lamps in the affected vehicles may not illuminate.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A following vehicle may not recognize that the vehicle is slowing or coming to a stop if the stop lamps on the vehicle do not illuminate as expected. There is an increased risk of a rear-end crash as a result.

Remedy: Hyundai will notify owners, and dealers will repair the stop lamp switch circuit, free of charge. Hyundai issued an interim notification to owners on January 6, 2015. The recall began on March 23, 2015. Owners may contact Hyundai customer service at 1-855-671-3059. Hyundai's number for this recall is 125.

13V489000 · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:fluid

Oct 29, 2013

Hyundai is recalling certain model year 2009-2012 Genesis vehicles manufactured April 30, 2008, through March 28, 2012. The vehicles may contain brake fluid which does not protect against corrosion of the Hydraulic Electronic Control Unit (HECU).

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the module corrodes, reduced brake effectiveness may result, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Hyundai will notify owners and instruct them to bring their vehicle to a dealer for service. Hyundai will inspect the HECU module for proper operation, and will replace the modules as necessary. Hyundai will replace the factory brake fluid in those vehicles that have not previously had the factory brake fluid replaced. These repairs will be done free of charge. The recall began on December 24, 2013. Owners may contact Hyundai at 1-800-633-5151 or by email at consumeraffairs@hmausa.com. Hyundai's recall number is 114.

13V113000 · Exterior Lighting:brake Lights:switch

Apr 1, 2013

Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai) is recalling certain model year 2006-2009 Accent, model year 2007-2011 Azera, Sonata and Sante Fe,2006-2011 Tucson, 2009-2011 Elantra Touring, 2007-2010 Elantra, 2008-2011 Veracruz, 2009-2011 Genesis, 2010-2011 Genesis Coupe, 2007-2008 Entourage, and 2006-2008 Tiburon vehicles. Originally, in April 2013, Hyundai recalled 1,059,824 model year 2007-2009 Accent and Tucson, model year 2007-2010 Elantra, model year 2007-2011 Santa Fe, model year 2008-2009 Veracruz, model year 2010-2011 Genesis Coupe, and model year 2011 Sonata vehicles. In September 2013, Hyundai informed the agency that it was adding more vehicles to this campaign, representing an additional 652,512 units. The total number of vehicles being recalled is now 1,712,336. In the affected vehicles, the stop lamp switch may malfunction. A malfunctioning stop lamp switch may cause the brake lights to not illuminate when the brake pedal is depressed or may cause an inability to deactivate the cruise control by depressing the brake pedal. Additionally, a malfunctioning stop lamp switch may also result in intermittent operation of the push-button start feature, affect the operation of the brake transmission shift interlock feature, preventing the shifter from being moved out of the PARK position and cause the Electronic Stability Control (ESC) malfunction light to illuminate.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Failure to illuminate the stop lamps during braking or inability to disengage the cruise control could increase the risk of a crash. Additionally, when the ignition is in the 'ON' position, the transmission shifter may be able to be moved out of Park without first applying the brake. This may lead to unintentional movement of the car which may increase the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Hyundai will notify owners, and dealers will replace the stop lamp switch, free of charge. The safety recall began on April 22, 2013. Owners may contact Hyundai at 1-800-633-5151. Hyundai's recall campaign number is 110.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE13033 · Brake Hydraulic Control Module Failure

Opened Oct 17, 2013 · Closed Apr 4, 2014

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic; Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip; Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip:control Unit/module

On October 28, 2013, Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA describing a safety defect in the braking system of approximately 43,500 model year (MY) 2009 through 2012 Hyundai Genesis sedans (NHTSA Recall No. 13V-489).The Hyundai report indicates that the recalled vehicles may contain brake fluid that does not sufficiently inhibit corrosion on the zinc plating of control valve armatures in the Hydraulic Electronic Control Unit (HECU) module. The DIR indicated that, over time, the build-up of corrosion products may affect operation of HECU control valves, resulting in a low/soft brake pedal with reduced brake effectiveness, which may increase the risk of a crash.In October 2011, the HECU supplier notified Hyundai that the brake fluid used in production plants was causing corrosion of valve armatures in the control module.The supplier changed the coating of the valve armatures in late March 2012 to correct the problem in production vehicles.Hyundai's recall includes Genesis vehicles produced prior to the implementation of the HECU change.In March 2013, Hyundai initiated a Service Campaign (TL6) to replace brake fluid in the subject vehicles with brake fluid with better corrosion resistance properties.According to Hyundai's DIR letter, after PE13-033 was opened, the company noted that some of the vehicles serviced in the TL6 campaign subsequently required HECU replacement.This was an indication that internal corrosion had progressed enough to affect valve operation and brake performance, prompting Hyundai to conduct a safety recall.Hyundai's repair procedures for 13V-489 require brake system flushing and replacement in all recalled vehicles with a new fluid containing the necessary corrosion inhibitor.In addition, for vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, dealers will perform an inspection procedure to verify that the HECU is functioning properly and replace units that do not meet the test requirements.Hyundai indicated that, based on analysis of claim data, only vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010 have been in service long enough to require the additional inspection/replacement of the HECU. Analysis of failure data reported to NHTSA and provided by Hyundai in response to ODI's information request letter for PE13-033 identified 756 complaints and 1,683 warranty claims for 30,114 subject vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, resulting in a complaint rate of 25.1 incidents per thousand vehicles (IPTV) and a claim rate of 5.6 percent.The MY 2009 vehicles, with the longest exposure times, experienced the highest complaint (33.5 IPTV) and warranty (7.0 percent) rates.For the 45,639 subject vehicles produced after June 1, 2010, ODI identified 13 complaints and 34 warranty claims, resulting in a complaint rate of 0.3 IPTV and a warranty claim rate of 0.1 percent, indicating that the brake fluid corrosion concern had not progressed far enough to result in significant rates of brake system performance symptoms in those vehicles.This investigation is closed.ODI will continue to monitor complaints to evaluate the effectiveness of Hyundai's recall.The VOQs noted in the Failure Report are: 10569231, 10560898, 10560495, 10559360, 10558279, 10558264, 10556964, 10556631, 10556577, 10556322, 10554988, 10554802, 10554122, 10552958, 10551817, 10551157, 10551110, 10551092, 10550791, 10550773, 10550431, 10549750, 10549634, 10549629, 10549567, 10549402, 10549376, 10549270, 10549228, 10549186, 10549021, 10548903, 10548823, 10548791, 10548737, 10548722, 10548716, 10548705, 10546565, 10544803, 10543663, 10542962, 10541959, 10541741, 10538208, 10537934, 10536652, 105354

Additional source detail variants (3)

Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip:control Unit/module

On October 28, 2013, Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA describing a safety defect in the braking system of approximately 43,500 model year (MY) 2009 through 2012 Hyundai Genesis sedans (NHTSA Recall No. 13V-489).The Hyundai report indicates that the recalled vehicles may contain brake fluid that does not sufficiently inhibit corrosion on the zinc plating of control valve armatures in the Hydraulic Electronic Control Unit (HECU) module. The DIR indicated that, over time, the build-up of corrosion products may affect operation of HECU control valves, resulting in a low/soft brake pedal with reduced brake effectiveness, which may increase the risk of a crash.In October 2011, the HECU supplier notified Hyundai that the brake fluid used in production plants was causing corrosion of valve armatures in the control module.The supplier changed the coating of the valve armatures in late March 2012 to correct the problem in production vehicles.Hyundai's recall includes Genesis vehicles produced prior to the implementation of the HECU change.In March 2013, Hyundai initiated a Service Campaign (TL6) to replace brake fluid in the subject vehicles with brake fluid with better corrosion resistance properties.According to Hyundai's DIR letter, after PE13-033 was opened, the company noted that some of the vehicles serviced in the TL6 campaign subsequently required HECU replacement.This was an indication that internal corrosion had progressed enough to affect valve operation and brake performance, prompting Hyundai to conduct a safety recall.Hyundai's repair procedures for 13V-489 require brake system flushing and replacement in all recalled vehicles with a new fluid containing the necessary corrosion inhibitor.In addition, for vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, dealers will perform an inspection procedure to verify that the HECU is functioning properly and replace units that do not meet the test requirements.Hyundai indicated that, based on analysis of claim data, only vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010 have been in service long enough to require the additional inspection/replacement of the HECU. Analysis of failure data reported to NHTSA and provided by Hyundai in response to ODI's information request letter for PE13-033 identified 756 complaints and 1,683 warranty claims for 30,114 subject vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, resulting in a complaint rate of 25.1 incidents per thousand vehicles (IPTV) and a claim rate of 5.6 percent.The MY 2009 vehicles, with the longest exposure times, experienced the highest complaint (33.5 IPTV) and warranty (7.0 percent) rates.For the 45,639 subject vehicles produced after June 1, 2010, ODI identified 13 complaints and 34 warranty claims, resulting in a complaint rate of 0.3 IPTV and a warranty claim rate of 0.1 percent, indicating that the brake fluid corrosion concern had not progressed far enough to result in significant rates of brake system performance symptoms in those vehicles.This investigation is closed.ODI will continue to monitor complaints to evaluate the effectiveness of Hyundai's recall.The VOQs noted in the Failure Report are: 10569231, 10560898, 10560495, 10559360, 10558279, 10558264, 10556964, 10556631, 10556577, 10556322, 10554988, 10554802, 10554122, 10552958, 10551817, 10551157, 10551110, 10551092, 10550791, 10550773, 10550431, 10549750, 10549634, 10549629, 10549567, 10549402, 10549376, 10549270, 10549228, 10549186, 10549021, 10548903, 10548823, 10548791, 10548737, 10548722, 10548716, 10548705, 10546565, 10544803, 10543663, 10542962, 10541959, 10541741, 10538208, 10537934, 10536652, 105354

Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip

On October 28, 2013, Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA describing a safety defect in the braking system of approximately 43,500 model year (MY) 2009 through 2012 Hyundai Genesis sedans (NHTSA Recall No. 13V-489).The Hyundai report indicates that the recalled vehicles may contain brake fluid that does not sufficiently inhibit corrosion on the zinc plating of control valve armatures in the Hydraulic Electronic Control Unit (HECU) module. The DIR indicated that, over time, the build-up of corrosion products may affect operation of HECU control valves, resulting in a low/soft brake pedal with reduced brake effectiveness, which may increase the risk of a crash.In October 2011, the HECU supplier notified Hyundai that the brake fluid used in production plants was causing corrosion of valve armatures in the control module.The supplier changed the coating of the valve armatures in late March 2012 to correct the problem in production vehicles.Hyundai's recall includes Genesis vehicles produced prior to the implementation of the HECU change.In March 2013, Hyundai initiated a Service Campaign (TL6) to replace brake fluid in the subject vehicles with brake fluid with better corrosion resistance properties.According to Hyundai's DIR letter, after PE13-033 was opened, the company noted that some of the vehicles serviced in the TL6 campaign subsequently required HECU replacement.This was an indication that internal corrosion had progressed enough to affect valve operation and brake performance, prompting Hyundai to conduct a safety recall.Hyundai's repair procedures for 13V-489 require brake system flushing and replacement in all recalled vehicles with a new fluid containing the necessary corrosion inhibitor.In addition, for vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, dealers will perform an inspection procedure to verify that the HECU is functioning properly and replace units that do not meet the test requirements.Hyundai indicated that, based on analysis of claim data, only vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010 have been in service long enough to require the additional inspection/replacement of the HECU. Analysis of failure data reported to NHTSA and provided by Hyundai in response to ODI's information request letter for PE13-033 identified 756 complaints and 1,683 warranty claims for 30,114 subject vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, resulting in a complaint rate of 25.1 incidents per thousand vehicles (IPTV) and a claim rate of 5.6 percent.The MY 2009 vehicles, with the longest exposure times, experienced the highest complaint (33.5 IPTV) and warranty (7.0 percent) rates.For the 45,639 subject vehicles produced after June 1, 2010, ODI identified 13 complaints and 34 warranty claims, resulting in a complaint rate of 0.3 IPTV and a warranty claim rate of 0.1 percent, indicating that the brake fluid corrosion concern had not progressed far enough to result in significant rates of brake system performance symptoms in those vehicles.This investigation is closed.ODI will continue to monitor complaints to evaluate the effectiveness of Hyundai's recall.The VOQs noted in the Failure Report are: 10569231, 10560898, 10560495, 10559360, 10558279, 10558264, 10556964, 10556631, 10556577, 10556322, 10554988, 10554802, 10554122, 10552958, 10551817, 10551157, 10551110, 10551092, 10550791, 10550773, 10550431, 10549750, 10549634, 10549629, 10549567, 10549402, 10549376, 10549270, 10549228, 10549186, 10549021, 10548903, 10548823, 10548791, 10548737, 10548722, 10548716, 10548705, 10546565, 10544803, 10543663, 10542962, 10541959, 10541741, 10538208, 10537934, 10536652, 105354

Service Brakes, Hydraulic

On October 28, 2013, Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA describing a safety defect in the braking system of approximately 43,500 model year (MY) 2009 through 2012 Hyundai Genesis sedans (NHTSA Recall No. 13V-489).The Hyundai report indicates that the recalled vehicles may contain brake fluid that does not sufficiently inhibit corrosion on the zinc plating of control valve armatures in the Hydraulic Electronic Control Unit (HECU) module. The DIR indicated that, over time, the build-up of corrosion products may affect operation of HECU control valves, resulting in a low/soft brake pedal with reduced brake effectiveness, which may increase the risk of a crash.In October 2011, the HECU supplier notified Hyundai that the brake fluid used in production plants was causing corrosion of valve armatures in the control module.The supplier changed the coating of the valve armatures in late March 2012 to correct the problem in production vehicles.Hyundai's recall includes Genesis vehicles produced prior to the implementation of the HECU change.In March 2013, Hyundai initiated a Service Campaign (TL6) to replace brake fluid in the subject vehicles with brake fluid with better corrosion resistance properties.According to Hyundai's DIR letter, after PE13-033 was opened, the company noted that some of the vehicles serviced in the TL6 campaign subsequently required HECU replacement.This was an indication that internal corrosion had progressed enough to affect valve operation and brake performance, prompting Hyundai to conduct a safety recall.Hyundai's repair procedures for 13V-489 require brake system flushing and replacement in all recalled vehicles with a new fluid containing the necessary corrosion inhibitor.In addition, for vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, dealers will perform an inspection procedure to verify that the HECU is functioning properly and replace units that do not meet the test requirements.Hyundai indicated that, based on analysis of claim data, only vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010 have been in service long enough to require the additional inspection/replacement of the HECU. Analysis of failure data reported to NHTSA and provided by Hyundai in response to ODI's information request letter for PE13-033 identified 756 complaints and 1,683 warranty claims for 30,114 subject vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, resulting in a complaint rate of 25.1 incidents per thousand vehicles (IPTV) and a claim rate of 5.6 percent.The MY 2009 vehicles, with the longest exposure times, experienced the highest complaint (33.5 IPTV) and warranty (7.0 percent) rates.For the 45,639 subject vehicles produced after June 1, 2010, ODI identified 13 complaints and 34 warranty claims, resulting in a complaint rate of 0.3 IPTV and a warranty claim rate of 0.1 percent, indicating that the brake fluid corrosion concern had not progressed far enough to result in significant rates of brake system performance symptoms in those vehicles.This investigation is closed.ODI will continue to monitor complaints to evaluate the effectiveness of Hyundai's recall.The VOQs noted in the Failure Report are: 10569231, 10560898, 10560495, 10559360, 10558279, 10558264, 10556964, 10556631, 10556577, 10556322, 10554988, 10554802, 10554122, 10552958, 10551817, 10551157, 10551110, 10551092, 10550791, 10550773, 10550431, 10549750, 10549634, 10549629, 10549567, 10549402, 10549376, 10549270, 10549228, 10549186, 10549021, 10548903, 10548823, 10548791, 10548737, 10548722, 10548716, 10548705, 10546565, 10544803, 10543663, 10542962, 10541959, 10541741, 10538208, 10537934, 10536652, 105354