2024 GMC Yukon

Oil consumption, vehicle is using 1 quart minimum every 2000 miles, has been through 3 service cycles in 17303 miles due to this issue. Has had recall test done by Morehart GMC in Durango, CO as well as oil consumption test completed by same dealership. The first time this occurred the vehicle was taken to Hi Country GMC in Farmington, New Mexico, USA, where the service manager blamed the issue on driving.

The contact owns a 2024 GMC Yukon. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, there was an abnormal burning odor entering the vehicle from the engine compartment. There was no warning light illuminated. Upon inspection, the contact observed that the vehicle was burning oil. The dealer was contacted, but the vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The contact expressed concerns that the issue might be related to carbon monoxide entering the engine compartment and cabin, which could pose a serious safety hazard. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 28,750.

On 15 Aug 2025, I was driving this vehicle on Rte 151 in raccoon township with my 2 children when the vehicle suddenly and unexpectedly experienced a “loss of propulsion” with a corresponding uncommanded shift to “neutral”. Attempts to shift the car back into drive were met with a “parameters not safe” caution. I was fortunate enough that the vehicle behind me was able to slow and an accident was avoided. The thought that this could have happened with my family on the highway, during adverse conditions, or any other scenario is frightening to say the least. Other owners of affected models weren’t as fortunate.

While driving on the interstate, I felt the engine "slip". Immediately afterwards, I heard a load knocking noise from under the hood, the check engine light came on, and the vehicle lost power. I was able to pull off the interstate. Called a towing company and got the vehicle towed to a GMC dealer. The dealership diagnosed the vehicle and noted a critical issue with the engine and transmission. Dealership recommends engine replacement. Vehicle is less than a year old with 15,400 miles on the odometer. This particular vehicle is not impacted by the GMC recall on their engine, however is has the same engine failure.

I have had several time that going down the highway at around 70 MPH with the cruise control on. Know other cars or trucks around me, my car loses power, put on the brakes. If I press on the gas petal, the car will accelerate. Never a warning, scares the heck out of you. Fortunately when this happens I have never had a car or truck behind me. If there would be a car or truck behind me, this could cause a collision for sure. No warning lights comes on. I've told the GMC dealer twice about this. Twice I was told to make another service appointment to bring my Yukon back. I was told that no service tech was available to look at this at this time.

I am the owner of a 2024 GMC Yukon Denali/AT4-T1, currently subject to GM Program #N252494000 for the L87 Engine Loss of Propulsion engine defect that can cause sudden engine failure, loss of power, and safety hazards. My vehicle has approximately 18,000 miles and is my primary mode of transportation. GM has informed me that I cannot request an immediate inspection and that they are randomly selecting affected vehicles for inspection without a clear timetable. This means I must continue driving a vehicle with a known safety defect that could fail at any moment — creating an unreasonable risk for myself, my passengers, and others on the road. My dealership has confirmed they cannot perform the inspection until GM activates my VIN in their system. No estimated timeframe has been provided. Given the severity of the defect and the potential for catastrophic failure without warning, I respectfully request that NHTSA investigate GM’s phased approach to inspections and determine whether this practice is consistent with the safety obligations under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 and related regulations. I also request guidance on how I can have my vehicle inspected immediately to mitigate risk. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

I had just backed the truck out of a parking space (while turning) and shifted the transmission into 'Drive' with my foot pressing the brake pedal (not the gas pedal). When I took my foot off the brake pedal in order to transfer it to the gas pedal the vehicle suddenly accelerated forward without my foot ever pressing the gas pedal. The vehicle traveled forward about 20 feet before I was able to stop it by pressing the brake pedal. I am a retired General Motors Safety engineer and I know I was not pressing the gas (accelerator) pedal when this sudden acceleration event occurred. I believe this type of event occurred one other time while I was driving this vehicle. However, I am not as clear about the circumstances surrounding this previous event.

NHTSA Complaint: Campaign 25V274 Vehicle: 2024 GMC Yukon (VIN: [XXX], 33,293 miles) GM Case [XXX] Recall: N252494000 (NHTSA 25V274), issued April 24, 2025; related bulletins N252494001, N252494002, N252494003 Defect: Manufacturing defects in the 6.2L V8 (L87) engine’s connecting rod and/or crankshaft, risking engine failure and crashes. GM acknowledges 12 potentially related alleged crashes and 12 alleged injuries in the U.S. Issue: My vehicle has been at Royal Buick GMC, Inc. (355 Rte 23 N, Sussex, NJ 07461) since April 10, 2025 (106 days as of July 25, 2025). The recall remedy (inspection for DTC P0016, oil change to 0W-40 if passed, or engine replacement per N252494002 if failed) is unavailable, with no engine repairs performed per invoice RO# [XXX] (dated July 22, 2025, check-in April 10, 2025, 9:30 PM, ready July 22, 2025, 9:48 AM). The invoice shows only a multi-point inspection ($50.00, Customer Pay), next appointment ($50.00), and courtesy transportation (no charge). A condition report dated July 24, 2025, notes “4 issues” from a visual inspection, recommending a complete dealership check, indicating unresolved safety concerns. The dealership provided a lesser-value loaner, inadequate for a premium SUV. The vehicle was purchased on [XXX], for $87,821.64 (per Acceptance_Declination Sheet_[XXX}), entitling me to a safe vehicle under warranty. On July 23, 2025, at 3:30 PM EDT, Tom McGillis texted, “Hello, Your vehicle is in the shop and should be done first thing tomorrow. I have it schedule for a wash tomorrow. I will follow up mid-afternoon on its status. ty!” No recall repairs mentioned. Maggie stated they were waiting for the “new car shine to dry,” confirmed no solution, and said engine replacement queries were “above her paygrade.” I instructed her I will not accept an unsafe vehicle. On July 24, 2025, at 8:45 AM EDT, Andrew Wilson confirmed no remedy, stated rear differential repairs are complete (not reflected in invoice), and INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA),

NHTSA Complaint: Campaign 25V274 Vehicle: 2024 GMC Yukon (VIN: [XXX] , 33,294 miles) GM Case #[XXX] Recall: N252494000 (NHTSA 25V274), issued April 24, 2025; related bulletins N252494001 (dealer inventory), N252494002 (engine replacement) Defect: Manufacturing defects in the 6.2L V8 (L87) engine’s connecting rod and/or crankshaft, risking engine failure and crashes. Issue: My vehicle has been at Royal Buick GMC, Inc. (355 Rte 23 N, Sussex, NJ 07461) since April 10, 2025 (104 days as of July 23, 2025). The recall remedy (inspection for DTC P0016, oil change to 0W-40 if passed, or engine replacement per N252494002 if failed) is unavailable, with no repairs performed per invoice RO# [XXX} (July 22, 2025). The dealership provided a lesser-value loaner, inadequate for a premium SUV. On July 23, 2025, at 5:03 PM EDT, the dealership texted, “Your vehicle is in the shop and should be done first thing tomorrow. I have it schedule for a wash tomorrow. I will follow up mid-afternoon on its status. ty!” Maggie stated they were waiting for the “new car shine to dry.” When asked if the engine was replaced, Maggie said it was “above her paygrade” and confirmed no solution exists, with no timeline for remedy availability. I instructed her I will not accept an unsafe vehicle and to relay this to the service manager. NHTSA.gov [XXX] ) confirms the recall is unrepaired, remedy not available. Communications with GM: July 15, 2025, 3:00 PM EDT: GM Customer Support Supervisor Rochelle confirmed no parts or resolution timeline. July 15, 2025, 3:30 PM EDT: SMS to Tom McGillis, service advisor, requesting update. No actionable GM response. July 23, 2025, 1:32 PM EDT: GM representative Cynthia stated GM had not heard from the dealership and escalated Case [XXX] to internal corporate resolution. No parts or timeline provided. Complaint: GM’s 104-day delay in providing a recall remedy (N252494000/N252494002), inadequate loaner, INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)