VEHICLE EXPERIENCING PROBLEM WITH ENGINE STALLING AT 300 RPM; DEALER NOTIFIED AND INFORMED CONSUMER THAT A MODULE REPLACEMENT WAS NEEDED TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM AT CONSUMER'S COST OF $450.00 . *AK
1994 Ford Mustang
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
More warning signs than most Mustang years
Owner complaints for the 1994 Ford Mustang are substantially higher than the model-year median of 81.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Mustang years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
Limited mileage data: 35 of 356 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Engine And Engine Cooling. Review the 160 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Power Train. Review the 50 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Air Bags. Review the 35 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
Engine And Engine Cooling complaints
160 reportsVEHICLE SEEMS TO BE RUNNING HOT. THERMOSTAT NEEDLE WENT UP VEY HIGH, ALL THE WAY TO RED. UNABLE TO DRIVE VEHICLE. CONSUMER HAD IT TOWED TO DEALER WHO FOUND OUT THAT AN ENGINE HEAD GASKET BLEW OUT. *AK
THIS PROMBLEM ISS AMAJOR PROMBLEM IN MUSTANGS IN 1994-95 SAME ENGINE AS THE WINDSTAR AND LINCOLN THEY WERRE RECALLED FEEL THAT THE MUSTANG SHOULD BE TO. MY CAR WAS VERY WELL TAKEN CARE OF CHANGEE THE OIL EVERY THREE THOUSAND MILES AT VALVOLINE GOT THE RECORDS I FEEL FORD SHOULD COVER THE REPAIRS THERES TO MANY REPORTS OF BAD H…
Read full complaint
THIS PROMBLEM ISS AMAJOR PROMBLEM IN MUSTANGS IN 1994-95 SAME ENGINE AS THE WINDSTAR AND LINCOLN THEY WERRE RECALLED FEEL THAT THE MUSTANG SHOULD BE TO. MY CAR WAS VERY WELL TAKEN CARE OF CHANGEE THE OIL EVERY THREE THOUSAND MILES AT VALVOLINE GOT THE RECORDS I FEEL FORD SHOULD COVER THE REPAIRS THERES TO MANY REPORTS OF BAD HEAD GASKETS IN THIS MODEL IT HAS TO BE DEFAULT WITH THIS MANY MILES ON IT. A LOT OF THE WINDSTARSS HEAD GASKETS WWENT OUT AROUND 40000 THOUSSAND MILES TO SO IT MUST BE THE ENGINEEEE. HOW CAN THEY RECALL A COUPLE OTHER CCCARS AND NOT THE MUSSTANG ITS THE SAME ENGINE AND PROBLEM . THEY SHOULD COVER IT. IM THINKING ABOUT TAKEN THEM TO SMALL CLAIMS COURT IF YOU CAN HELP ME OR GIVE ME AA LIST OF ALL THE PEOPLE WHO GOT THE SAME PROBLEM THAT WOULD BE GREAT IF YOU COULS EEMAIL ABOUT THISTHANK YOU GREG ELFERING
ENGINE FAILURE DUE TO HEAD GASKET AND FRONT ENGINE GASKET FAILURE. *AK
HEAD GASKET FAILURE, CAUSING LARGE AMOUNTS OF WHITE SMOKE TO COME OUT THE EXAUST.*AK
DURING MY RESEARCH, I HAVE FOUND THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM AMONG TAURUS, MUSTANG AND WINDSTAR OWNERS. THOUGH, CURRENTLY, FORD HAS ONLY ELECTED TO COVER EVERYTHING BUT THE MUSTANG. THIS IS SOMETHING I WILL PURSUE TO GET MY MONEY BACK SINCE IT APPEARS FORD IS AT FAULT HERE. AS OF YET, THEY HAVE NOT BEEN HELPFUL. *AK
ENGINE HEAD GASKET IS LEAKING WHICH CAUSES VEHICLE TO OVERHEAT. DEALER IS AWARE OF THE PROBLEM. ENGINE HEAD GASKET IS BEING REPLACED BY DEALERSHIP. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION. *AK
THE DEALER DIAGNOSED PROBLEM AS HEAD GASKET. THIS IS A 3.8 ENGINE AND OTHERS HAVE BEENED RECALLEDABY FORD. FORD SHOULD ADDRESS THIS PROBLEM IN ALL 3.8 ENGINES. IT SHOULD NOT HAVE GONE OUT AT 80000. *AK
WHY IS FORD PAYING FOR REPAIRS ON OTHER 3.8 LTR VEHICLES THAT HAVE BLOWN HEAD GASKETS? *AK
BOTH ENGINE HEAD GASKETS BLEW OUT, CAUSING OTHER RELATED DAMAGE. HEAD GASKETS HAVE SINCE BEEN REDESIGNED BY FORD TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE, BUT NO RECALLS. OWNER WANTS REIMBURSEMENT FOR REPAIRS. *AK
Official recalls
401V318000 · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module
Oct 3, 2001
EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES THAT HAVE HAD THE DRIVER'S AIR BAG MODULE REPLACED AFTER APRIL 5, 2000. THE REPLACEMENT DRIVER'S AIR BAG MODULE INFLATOR MAY HAVE INSUFFICIENT WELDS THAT COULD PREVENT PROPER INFLATION OF THE AIR BAG.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH, THE DRIVER'S AIR BAG MAY NOT PROPERLY DEPLOY WHICH COULD POTENTIALLY RESULT IN LESS THAN THE INTENDED LEVEL OF OCCUPANT PROTECTION.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT AND, IF NECESSARY, REPLACE THE DRIVER'S AIR BAG MODULE. OWNER NOTIFICATION BEGAN OCTOBER 5, 2001. OWNERS WHO TAKE THEIR VEHICLES TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER ON AN AGREED UPON SERVICE DATE AND DO NOT RECEIVE THE FREE REMEDY WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME SHOULD CONTACT FORD AT 1-866-436-7332.
00V349000 · Parking Brake:conventional
Oct 30, 2000
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH MANUAL TRANSMISSIONS. IF A VEHICLE IS PARKED WITH THE PARKING BRAKE NOT FULLY APPLIED AND NOT IN FIRST GEAR, AS DIRECTED IN THE OWNER GUIDE, AND THE SELF ADJUSTMENT PAWL SUBSEQUENTLY SKIPS ONE OR TWO TEETH, THE VEHICLE COULD MOVE ON SOME GRADES.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THIS COULD RESULT IN UNINTENDED VEHICLE MOVEMENT AND A VEHICLE CRASH WITHOUT PRIOR WARNING.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL MODIFY THE PARKING BRAKE CONTROL AND INSTALL A PLATE OR OVER-BRACKET TO THE CONTROL TO LOCK THE SELF ADJUST MECHANISM IN POSITION FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENT.
97V180000 · Structure:body:hood
Oct 20, 1997
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES AND MINI VANS. TEARING OF THE BOND BETWEEN THE INNER AND OUTER HOOD PANELS DURING MINOR FRONT END COLLISIONS CAN RESULT IN A GAP AT THE LEADING EDGE OF THE HOOD. AIR FORCED BETWEEN THE INNER AND OUTER PANELS CAN PRODUCE ENOUGH PRESSURE TO FORCE THE OUTER PANEL UPWARD.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THIS CONDITION CAN RESULT IN TOTAL SEPARATION OF THE OUTER HOOD PANEL.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE HOOD AREA FOR ANY DAMAGE ALONG THE LEADING EDGE OF THE HOOD. IF THERE IS ANY EVIDENCE OF BOND SEPARATION, THE HOOD WILL BE REPLACED. IF THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF BOND SEPARATION, ADDITIONAL ADHESIVE WILL BE APPLIED BETWEEN THE INNER AND OUTER HOOD PANELS.
95V062000 · Seats
Mar 27, 1995
THE WIRE HARNESS ON THESE SEATS IS BANDED TO THE FRONT SEAT CUSHION SUPPORTS. THE END OF ONE OF THE SUPPORTS CAN PUNCTURE THE HARNESS, RESULTING IN A HIGH RESISTANCE ELECTRICAL SHORT.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: OVERHEATING CAN RESULT, AND MELTING, SMOKE AND POSSIBLE IGNITION OF THE SURROUNDING MATERIALS CAN OCCUR.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REMOVE THE TIE STRAP FROM EACH OF THE FRONT SEATS.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
4EA98013 · Parking Brake
Opened May 27, 1998 · Closed Oct 31, 2000
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic
There is no summary currently available
PE97051 · Parking Brake Failure
Opened Dec 23, 1997 · Closed May 27, 1998
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic
THE NUMBER OF CRASHES REPORTED TOT HE MANUFACTURER WARRANTS FURTHER THIS INVESTIGATION
EA97018 · Outer Hood Panel Detachment
Opened Sep 30, 1997 · Closed Oct 22, 1997
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Structure
There is no summary currently available
PE97011 · Outer Hood Panel Detachment
Opened Mar 13, 1997 · Closed Sep 30, 1997
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Structure
THE OFFICE OF DEFECTS INVESTIGATION HAS RECEIVED 6 REPORTS INDICATING THE OUTER HOOD PANEL SEPARATED FROM THE VEHICLES AS THEY WERE BEING DRIVEN.FORD HAS PROVIDE 39 ADDITIONAL REPORTS THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH ODI REPORTS.FORD INDICATES THAT THE LIKELY CAUSE IS PRIOR COLLISION DAMAGE.THIS INVESTIGATION IS BEING UPGRADED TO FURTHER STUDY THIS ISSUE.
Illustration