← New search

2003 Ford Focus

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2003 Ford Focus do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 864.5.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

753 reports with mileage · 224 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Electrical System. Review the 522 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Latches/locks/linkages. Review the 82 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Steering. Review the 73 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

52 crash reports17 fire reports37 injury reports

Air Bags complaints

46 reports
Clear category filter
Mileage unknown · Nov 24, 2003
Air Bags

CONSUMER STATED WHILE DRIVING, THE PASSENGER SIDE AIR BAG DEPLOYED. SHE STATED SHE WAS THE ONLY ONE IN THE VEHICLE, SO NO ONE WAS INJURED. SHE STATED THERE WAS NO WARNING. *JB

NHTSA ODI #10048611

Mileage unknown · Nov 12, 2003
Air BagsInjury

WHILE DRIVING AT 25 MPH, THE SIDE AIR BAGS INADVERTENTLY DEPLOYED. THE DRIVER SUSTAINED INJURIES AS A RESULT. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE DEALERSHIP FOR INVESTIGATION. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION. *PH

NHTSA ODI #10047808

8,500 miles · Oct 22, 2003
Air BagsSeat BeltsCrashInjury

WHILE TRAVELING AT 40 MPH A DOG RAN INTO THE STREET AND CONSUMER'S VEHICLE HIT THE DOG. UPON IMPACT, NONE OF THE BAGS DEPLOYED, AND CONSUMER SUSTAINED CHEST INJURIES. IN ADDITION, DRIVER'S SIDE SEAT BELT FAILED, IT LOCKED THE DRIVER IN AFTER THE IMPACT. HOWEVER, PASSENGER'S SIDE SEAT BELT AND REAR SEAT BELTS FUNCTIONED P…

Read full complaint

WHILE TRAVELING AT 40 MPH A DOG RAN INTO THE STREET AND CONSUMER'S VEHICLE HIT THE DOG. UPON IMPACT, NONE OF THE BAGS DEPLOYED, AND CONSUMER SUSTAINED CHEST INJURIES. IN ADDITION, DRIVER'S SIDE SEAT BELT FAILED, IT LOCKED THE DRIVER IN AFTER THE IMPACT. HOWEVER, PASSENGER'S SIDE SEAT BELT AND REAR SEAT BELTS FUNCTIONED PROPERLY.*AK

NHTSA ODI #10044570

8,000 miles · Sep 30, 2003
Air BagsCrashInjury

VEHICLE WAS INVOLVED IN A FRONTAL COLLISION WHILE DRIVING AT 25/30 MPH. UPON IMPACT, NEITHER PASSENGER'S SIDE NOR DRIVER'S SIDE AIR BAGS DEPLOYED. PASSENGER SUSTAINED INJURES. *AK

NHTSA ODI #10041983

Mileage unknown · Aug 28, 2003
Air Bags

I BOUGHT MY FIRST BRAND NEW CAR, 2003 FORD FOCUS! SINCE IT'S A BRAND NEW CAR, I EXPECTED IT TO BE FLAWLESS. HOWEVER, I WAS SO DISAPPOINTED WHEN WE FOUND RUST ON THE MUFFLER, THEN ON THE METAL FRAME IN THE DASHBOARD AREA. WE TALKED TO THE ASST. MGR (JAY PARKER) ON 8/24. I ASKED FOR THE GM, BUT HE SAID TO CALL MONDAY, 8/25 T…

Read full complaint

I BOUGHT MY FIRST BRAND NEW CAR, 2003 FORD FOCUS! SINCE IT'S A BRAND NEW CAR, I EXPECTED IT TO BE FLAWLESS. HOWEVER, I WAS SO DISAPPOINTED WHEN WE FOUND RUST ON THE MUFFLER, THEN ON THE METAL FRAME IN THE DASHBOARD AREA. WE TALKED TO THE ASST. MGR (JAY PARKER) ON 8/24. I ASKED FOR THE GM, BUT HE SAID TO CALL MONDAY, 8/25 TO SEE IF HE'S IN. HE WAS IN ON MONDAY, BUT THEY HAD ME TALK TO ANOTHER PERSON, EDDIE SUZUI. HE SAID TO BRING THE CAR IN AND ASK FOR HIM. AS SOON AS WE GOT THERE, WE WERE TOLD TO BRING THE CAR TO THE SERVICE AREA, AND ROBERT ENRIQUES, THE SERVICE ADVISOR EXAMINED THE CAR, AND WENT THROUGH THE LIST OF PROBLEMS ABOUT THE CAR. HE DID SAY THE RUST ON THE MUFFLER IS JUST "SURFACE" RUST, BUT THE OTHER RUST IS "MORE THAN SURFACE RUST". I ASKED HIM WHY FORD SELLS CARS WITH RUST IN IT. HE JUST SHRUGGED HIS SHOULDERS AND SAID NOTHING. I TOLD HIM THAT I DIDN'T WANT THE CAR ANYMORE, SO I ASKED TO SEE THE GM. ROBERT SAID HE'LL GET THE GM, BUT A FEW MINUTES LATER, THE ASST. MGR CAME TO TALK TO US. BASICALLY, JAY CONFIRMED WHAT ROBERT ALREADY TOLD US, AND TRULY EMPHASIZED THAT THE CAR DOES HAVE SERIOUS RUST ON THE FRAME, AND THAT WE'RE NOT JUST IMAGINING IT! IT IS NOT JUST SURFACE RUST!ROBERT ENRIQUES TOOK PICTURES OF THE RUST AND SENT THEM TO DIGITAL IMAGING. ROBERT TOLD ME THAT MANUFACTURER WON'T TAKE THE CAR BACK. HE ALSO SAID THAT THE FORD SERVICE REP WILL BE HERE IN HAWAII ON 9/8, AND HE'LL SHOW THE PICTURES TO HIM THEN AND DECISION WILL BE MADE. I FINALLY GOT TO TALK TO THE GM (8/27), AND TOLD HIM ALL THE PROBLEMS WITH THE CAR. HE SAID HE'LL TAKE CARE OF THE RUST, AND ALL THE OTHER THINGS CAN BE TAKEN CARE OF, BUT THEY'RE ALL MINOR PROBLEMS. I DON'T THINK THEY ARE! NOT ON A BRAND NEW CAR! JAY PARKER TOLD US ON MONDAY, 8/25 THAT THIS BRAND NEW CAR DOES HAVE SOME SERIOUS RUSH, AND IF THE MANUFACTURER IS NOT GOING TO TAKE BACK THE CAR, I COULD GO FOR ARBITRATION. THIS CAR COULD BE CLASSIFIED AS A "LEMON" CAR. THANKS FOR YOUR HELP.

NHTSA ODI #10036798

Mileage unknown · Jul 8, 2003
Air BagsCrashInjury

THE ACCIDENT THAT TOOK PLACE ON 5/29/03 INVOLVED A 2003 FORD FOCUS STATION WAGON DRIVEN BY MY SON. THERE WAS IMPACT WHERE A PARKED CAR AND A TREE WAS INVOLVED,AND THE AIRBAGS DID NOT DEPLOY AT ALL. I THOUGHT AIRBAGS WERE A SAFETY FEATURE THAT SHOULD HELP PREVENT BODILY INJURIES. I WROT A LETTER TO FORD MOTOR COMPANY YET I HAVE R…

Read full complaint

THE ACCIDENT THAT TOOK PLACE ON 5/29/03 INVOLVED A 2003 FORD FOCUS STATION WAGON DRIVEN BY MY SON. THERE WAS IMPACT WHERE A PARKED CAR AND A TREE WAS INVOLVED,AND THE AIRBAGS DID NOT DEPLOY AT ALL. I THOUGHT AIRBAGS WERE A SAFETY FEATURE THAT SHOULD HELP PREVENT BODILY INJURIES. I WROT A LETTER TO FORD MOTOR COMPANY YET I HAVE RECEIVED NO RESPONSE TO THIS MATTER. I ALSO SPOKE TO ONE OF THEIR REPRESENTATIVES BY THE NAME OF "MARY" WHO WAS SUPPOSE TO BE GIVING THE INFORMATION TO THE ENGINEERING STAFF THAT HANDLES THESE TYPES OF PROBLEMS,"YET NO RESPONSE. WHEN THIS CAR WAS PURCHASED I DIDN'T EXPECT MECHANICAL FAILURE TO OCCUR. I'AM NOT PLEASED AT ALL THAT FORD MOTOR HAS NOT CONTACTED ME CONCERNING THIS MATTER. THE PEOPLE THAT WERE INJURED IN THE ACCIDENT ARE NOW SUING MY INSURANCE COMPANY AND MYSELF DUE TO THE ACCIDENT AND AIRBAGS NOT DEPLOYING AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT. THEN WHEN SPEAKING TO THEIR REPRESENTATIVE SHE STATED IT WAS MY RESPONSIBILTY TO GET THE CAR OVER TO A FORD DEALER TO HAVE THE AIRBAGS INSPECTED,"I DONT'T THINK SO". I WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO DRIVE THIS VEHICLE DUE TO THE NATURE OF AIRBAG MECHANICAL FAILURE. MY CAR IS STILL IN THE SHOP AND I MYSELF REFUSE TO HAVE IT REPAIRED UNTIL FORD MOTOR COMPANY SENDS SOMEONE TO INSPECT THIS VEHICLE.*AK

NHTSA ODI #10025668

Official recalls

1

05V030000 · Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch

Feb 1, 2005

CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES WITH FOUR OR FIVE DOORS AND ORIGINALLY SOLD IN OR CURRENTLY REGISTERED IN CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, IOWA, MAINE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSOURI, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE ISLAND, VERMONT, WEST VIRGINIA, WISCONSIN, AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, A BUILD-UP OF CORROSION AT THE PAWL PIVOT AREA OF THE REAR DOOR LATCH CAN CAUSE A BINDING CONDITION OF THE PAWL THAT MAY AFFECT PROPER ENGAGEMENT OF THE PAWL INTO THE CATCH. THE OCCUPANT MAY EXPERIENCE DIFFICULTY OPENING OR CLOSING A REAR DOOR, AND EVENTUALLY THE REAR DOOR MAY NOT LATCH PROPERLY.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: IF NOT LATCHED PROPERLY, THE DOOR MAY OPEN WHILE THE VEHICLE IS IN MOTION. IF AN OCCUPANT FELL OUT OF THE VEHICLE, PERSONAL INJURIES COULD OCCUR.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL HAVE A LOWER ROCKER SEAL ADDED TO THE DOOR AND HAVE THE REAR DOOR LATCHES EVALUATED FREE OF CHARGE. A LATCH THAT PASSES THE EVALUATION WILL BE LUBRICATED TO PREVENT FUTURE CORROSION. A LATCH THAT DOES NOT PASS THE EVALUATION WILL BE REPLACED. IN ADDITION, A STICKER WILL BE AFFIXED TO THE REAR DOORS ADVISING THE OWNERS TO USE THE RECOMMENDED LUBRICANT. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MARCH 9, 2005. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-800-392-3673.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

AQ10001 · Fleet Vehicle Recall Completion Audit

Opened Nov 18, 2010 · Closed Dec 28, 2015

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Unknown Or Other

On November 18, 2010, NHTSA's Recall Management Division (RMD) opened an audit query (AQ10-001) to investigate recall remedy completion by rental car companies on safety recall campaigns.It was expected to provide the agency an indication of how completely and how quickly rental car fleets perform necessary recall-related remedies on the vehicles owned and then rented/leased for use on the roadways.RMD queried three (3) major motor vehicle manufacturers (Ford, Chrysler, and General Motors) and requested data regarding completion figures for fifteen (15) discreet safety recalls.Analysis of this data demonstrated that rental car recalls completion was neither complete nor consistent.The rental car companies representing the largest market share in the industry were then queried as to their respective policies for the rental, lease, and sale of vehicles with open recalls.The data and responses from the manufacturers and the rental car companies can be found in the document repository by accessing the ?Associated Documents link above.In December 2015, Congress enacted the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act.One section of the Act prohibits rental car companies from renting, leasing, or selling motor vehicles subject to open safety recalls.With the passage of the FAST Act and its prohibition, there is no continuing need for the agency to investigate rental car recall completions.Accordingly, this investigation is closed.The agency reserves the right to open any future investigations, including audits of individual recalls, or groups of recalls, or rental car companies, to examine more closely safety recalls performance and completion issues in this area.