WHILE DRIVINGMY FORD F350 CREW CAB LONGBED DIESEL 4X4 AT 70 MPH ON INTERSTATE 10, A 4 LANE HWY IN EACH DIRECTION, THE TRUCK LOST ALL ENGINE POWER AND POWER ASSIST TO THE BRAKES AND POWER STEERING. LUCKILY THE TRAFFIC WAS LIGHT AND I WAS ABLE TO MANEUVER THE OFF THE HWY WITHOUT COMING IN CONTACT WITH ANOTHER VEHICLE. THE TRUC…
Read full complaint
WHILE DRIVINGMY FORD F350 CREW CAB LONGBED DIESEL 4X4 AT 70 MPH ON INTERSTATE 10, A 4 LANE HWY IN EACH DIRECTION, THE TRUCK LOST ALL ENGINE POWER AND POWER ASSIST TO THE BRAKES AND POWER STEERING. LUCKILY THE TRAFFIC WAS LIGHT AND I WAS ABLE TO MANEUVER THE OFF THE HWY WITHOUT COMING IN CONTACT WITH ANOTHER VEHICLE. THE TRUCK WAS TOWED TO A FORD DEALERSHIP AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE HIGH PRESSURE FUEL PUMP CAME APART AND PUT METAL SHAVING EVERYWHERE THROUGHOUT THE FUEL SYSTEM. FORD RECOMMENDED REPLACING ALL OF THE HIGH PRESSURE SYSTEM THIS INCLUDED ALL NEW FUEL INJECTORS. THIS REPAIR COST $9,000.. A SEARCH OF THE INTERNET REVEALED THAT THIS IS A KNOWN FAILURE. I HAD AN INDEPENDENT LAB TEST THE FUEL. THERE WERE NO CONTAMINANTS IN THE FUEL EXCEPT THE METAL SHAVING FROM THE PUMP. ( THE FORD FUEL SYSTEM RECIRCULATES THE EXCESS FUEL BACK TO THE TANK) THE TRUCK HAS 115000 MILES. I HAD THE FORD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE 5000 MILE SERVICES OPTION. FORD HAS PROVIDED ALL OF THE SERVICE INCLUDING THE ONES AFTER THE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT ENDED. THIS IS A VERY EXPENSIVE REPAIR TO UNDERTAKE ON A 7 YEAR OLD VEHICLE. ENGINEERING CHANGES COULD HAVE PREVENTED THE EXTENT OF THE DAMAGE. A POST PUMP FILTER OR SCREEN WOULD HAVE PREVENTED THE REST OF THE HIGH PRESSURE SYSTEM FROM NEEDING REPLACEMENT. AN ADVISORY ABOUT THE POTENTIAL PUMP FAILURE AND REPLACING THE PUMP BEFORE FAILURE WOULD HAVE COSTED LESS THAN $2000. HAD I BEEN TOWING NEAR FULL GCWR, 21,000 LBS AND COME UP ON LOS ANGELES STOP AND GO TRAFFIC, THIS COULD HAVE BE A TERRIBLE ACCIDENT.
NHTSA ODI #11071983
Mileage unknown · Apr 25, 2017
EnginePower Train
2011 FORD F-350. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO DIESEL ENGINE FAILURE - SERVICE BULLETIN REFERS TO VEHICLE MISFIRE/ RUNS ROUGH DUE TO A BROKEN INJECTOR HOLD DOWN CLAMP. *SMD ..UPDATED 09/07/17*BF THE CONSUMER STATED WHILE DRIVING THE ENGINE SUDDENLY LOST POWER AND STOPPED. THE ENGINE WOULD NOT RESTART OR IDLE. THE CONSUMER AD…
Read full complaint
2011 FORD F-350. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO DIESEL ENGINE FAILURE - SERVICE BULLETIN REFERS TO VEHICLE MISFIRE/ RUNS ROUGH DUE TO A BROKEN INJECTOR HOLD DOWN CLAMP. *SMD ..UPDATED 09/07/17*BF THE CONSUMER STATED WHILE DRIVING THE ENGINE SUDDENLY LOST POWER AND STOPPED. THE ENGINE WOULD NOT RESTART OR IDLE. THE CONSUMER ADVISES THE FAILURE SHOULD BE A RECALL.. *JS UPDATED 9/5/18*JB
NHTSA ODI #10925828
29,998 miles · Aug 17, 2014
Fuel System, GasolinePower Train
I NOTICED THAT MY TRUCK WOULD SHIFT HARD WHEN I STARTED IT IN THE MORNING AT AROUND 24000 MILES. TOOK THE TRUCK TO FORD UNDER WARRANTY AND THEY TOLD ME THAT THEY COULD NOT DO ANYTHING THAT IT WAS THE NEW SIX SPEED. NOW I HAVE BEEN SMELLING FUEL SO I TOOK IT TO FORD AND THEY TOLD ME THAT IT WAS MORE THAN LIKELY A VARMINT CHEWED…
Read full complaint
I NOTICED THAT MY TRUCK WOULD SHIFT HARD WHEN I STARTED IT IN THE MORNING AT AROUND 24000 MILES. TOOK THE TRUCK TO FORD UNDER WARRANTY AND THEY TOLD ME THAT THEY COULD NOT DO ANYTHING THAT IT WAS THE NEW SIX SPEED. NOW I HAVE BEEN SMELLING FUEL SO I TOOK IT TO FORD AND THEY TOLD ME THAT IT WAS MORE THAN LIKELY A VARMINT CHEWED THE LINE AND THAT I WAS OVER MONTHS ON MY 2011 MODEL TRUCK BUT NOT MILES, COULD NOT HELP ME EVEN THOUGH IT IS A FIRE HAZARD. I DECIDED TO SEE WHAT I COULD FIND AND FOUND THAT IT WAS LEAKING AROUND THE FUEL SENDING UNIT FROM A POSSIBLE FUEL LINE SEAL, STILL HAVE NOT FIXED BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO BUY ALL NEW LINES AND REPLACE AT A LARGE COST. TOLD FORD THINKING I WOULD RECEIVE SOME HELP SINCE IT IS LESS THAN 36000 MILES AND THEIR MECHANIC SAID THAT IS THE SHIFT PROBLEM IN THE MORNING WHICH WAS UNDER WARRANTY WHEN REPORTED AND STILL GOT SHOT DOWN. MY BABY TO FIX AT MY COST. I HAVE OWNED NOTHING BUT FORDS MY ENTIRE LIFE AND NOW CONSIDERING GMC. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10625878
35,000 miles · Oct 8, 2013
Power Train
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD F350. THE CONTACT STATED THAT AFTER SHIFTING INTO PARK, THE VEHICLE ROLLED AWAY IN REVERSE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSIS BUT THEY WERE UNABLE TO DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 35,000.
NHTSA ODI #10547208
36,285 miles · May 29, 2013
Power Train
TO DATE THIS VEHICLE HAS BEEN IN 5 TIMES FOR EMISSION WORK. TROUBLE CODES INCLUDE, I DON'T HAVE THE PAPERWORK YET FOR ALL INCIDENTS, P207F, P20EE & P2200. PRIOR TO THIS IT WAS IN 1 TIME UNDER RECALL FOR AN EMISSIONS SYSTEM "FLASH." OUT OF SERVICE TIME HAS TO BE AROUND 3+ WEEKS AT (NOT BUSINESS DAYS) THIS POINT WITH ADDITIONAL TI…
Read full complaint
TO DATE THIS VEHICLE HAS BEEN IN 5 TIMES FOR EMISSION WORK. TROUBLE CODES INCLUDE, I DON'T HAVE THE PAPERWORK YET FOR ALL INCIDENTS, P207F, P20EE & P2200. PRIOR TO THIS IT WAS IN 1 TIME UNDER RECALL FOR AN EMISSIONS SYSTEM "FLASH." OUT OF SERVICE TIME HAS TO BE AROUND 3+ WEEKS AT (NOT BUSINESS DAYS) THIS POINT WITH ADDITIONAL TIME SITTING AT HOME WAITING FOR SHOP SPACE TO OPEN UP. THE POWERTRAIN ON THIS VEHICLE IS STOCK AND HAS NEVER BEEN MODIFIED. REPLACEMENT PARTS HAVE BEEN AT THE REGIONAL REPS DIRECTION AND NOT WHAT THE SERVICE TECH'S WANTED. MY FEELING IS THAT RELATIVELY INEXPENSIVE PARTS ARE BEING "THROWN" AT THIS WITH NO ATTEMPT TO FIX THE UNDERLYING PROBLEM. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10514078
29,000 miles · Feb 19, 2013
EngineFuel/propulsion SystemPower Train
ACCORDING TO FORD THE TRUCK'S FUEL PUMP WENT OUT. THEY SAID IT WAS BACK ORDERED. 1100 TRUCKS AFFECTED. I DON'T BELIEVE FORD IS SUPPLYING THE WHOLE STORY ON THE ISSUE AND THEIR IS A LOT MORE TO IT. FORD IS HIDING SOMETHING AND YOU SHOULD LOOK INTO IT. I FORTUNATELY WAS IN A SAFE PLACE WHEN THE PUMP WENT OUT BUT OTHERS MAY NO…
Read full complaint
ACCORDING TO FORD THE TRUCK'S FUEL PUMP WENT OUT. THEY SAID IT WAS BACK ORDERED. 1100 TRUCKS AFFECTED. I DON'T BELIEVE FORD IS SUPPLYING THE WHOLE STORY ON THE ISSUE AND THEIR IS A LOT MORE TO IT. FORD IS HIDING SOMETHING AND YOU SHOULD LOOK INTO IT. I FORTUNATELY WAS IN A SAFE PLACE WHEN THE PUMP WENT OUT BUT OTHERS MAY NOT BE. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10499297
30,000 miles · Mar 14, 2012
Engine And Engine CoolingPower TrainService Brakes, Hydraulic
MY WIFE AND I WENT TO PICK UP THE 5TH WHEEL CAMPER FROM THE STORAGE AREA. I BACKED UP TO THE CAMPER, PUT THE TRUCK IN PARK AND DID A FEW THINGS BEFORE MY WIFE GOT OUT. AS SHE WAS GETTING OUT I MASHED THE BRAKE PEDAL FAIRLY HARD AND PLACED THE TRANSMISSION IN REVERSE. I DIDN'T WANT THE TRUCK MOVING WITH THE PASSENGER FRONT DOOR O…
Read full complaint
MY WIFE AND I WENT TO PICK UP THE 5TH WHEEL CAMPER FROM THE STORAGE AREA. I BACKED UP TO THE CAMPER, PUT THE TRUCK IN PARK AND DID A FEW THINGS BEFORE MY WIFE GOT OUT. AS SHE WAS GETTING OUT I MASHED THE BRAKE PEDAL FAIRLY HARD AND PLACED THE TRANSMISSION IN REVERSE. I DIDN'T WANT THE TRUCK MOVING WITH THE PASSENGER FRONT DOOR OPEN AND WHACKING MY WOMAN. AS THE WIFE WAS GETTING READY TO SHUT THE DOOR THE ENGINE RPM WENT SKY HIGH ON ITS OWN. MY WIFE LOOKED AT ME AS IF TO SAY WHAT THE HECK ARE YOU DOING! I GAVE HER A BLANK/SCARED LOOK AS IT WAS NOTHING I DID TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN. I GLANCED AT THE TACH AND I WAS UP OVER 2500 RPM, IN REVERSE, BUT THE TRUCK WASN'T TRYING TO GO ANYWHERE. IT WAS AS IF IT HAD DISENGAGED FROM REVERSE AND WAS RUNNING WILD. I PUT THE TRANSMISSION BACK INTO PARK AND LET GO OF THE BRAKE. THE ENGINE CONTINUED AT HIGH RPM FOR ANOTHER FEW SECONDS (SEEMED LIKE FOREVER) AND THEN WENT BACK TO IDLE. I SHUT THE ENGINE OFF, SAT FOR A FEW MOMENTS TO COLLECT MY SENSES AND THEN RE-STARTED THE ENGINE. RAN THROUGH ALL OF THE GEARS AND ALL WAS WORKING FINE. I THEN CONTINUED THE EFFORT TO CONNECT MY CAMPER TO THE TRUCK AND ALL WENT WELL. FACTS: 1. I AM 100% ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN MY FOOT WAS NOT ON THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL AND THE BRAKE AT THE SAME TIME. I NEVER DO THIS AND HAVE NEVER DONE THIS BY ACCIDENT. 2. I HAVE A WITNESS AND SHE WAS SCARED TO DEATH! 3. TSBS WERE CURRENT AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. 4. THIS PROBLEM HAS NEVER HAPPENED IN THE PAST. 5. MY TRUCK STILL HAS THE INFAMOUS SHIFTING ISSUES (TIP-IN, 2-3 SNAP-SHIFTS AMONGST OTHER GEAR SHIFTING ISSUES) EVEN AFTER THE 2011-7-?? TSB. 6. I CANNOT REPLICATE THIS SITUATION. IF THESE TRUCKS HAD BLACK BOX RECORDERS ON THEM, WHEN ISSUES LIKE THIS OCCUR WE COULD SHUT OFF THE TRUCK, PULL THE BLACK BOX AND TAKE IT TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSIS. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10451650
5,000 miles · Jan 12, 2012
Power Train
UPON ACCELERATION TRANSMISSION GOES INTO NEUTRAL BETWEEN 2ND AND 3RD GEAR ALLOWING THE MOTOR TO RACE WHILE THE TRUCK GOES INTO COAST ONLY MODE. THIS CAN PUT YOU AT THE MERCY OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC IF PULLING ON TO THE ROAD. HARD SHIFTS IN THE UPPER GEARS BOTH UP SHIFTING AND DOWN SHIFTING, OFTEN BONE JARRINGLY HARD. THIS CAUSES…
Read full complaint
UPON ACCELERATION TRANSMISSION GOES INTO NEUTRAL BETWEEN 2ND AND 3RD GEAR ALLOWING THE MOTOR TO RACE WHILE THE TRUCK GOES INTO COAST ONLY MODE. THIS CAN PUT YOU AT THE MERCY OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC IF PULLING ON TO THE ROAD. HARD SHIFTS IN THE UPPER GEARS BOTH UP SHIFTING AND DOWN SHIFTING, OFTEN BONE JARRINGLY HARD. THIS CAUSES THE TRUCK TO BREAK TRACTION WITH THE ROAD WHEN WET, SNOW COVERED OR WITH LOOSE GRAVEL PRESENT. MY LAST EXPERIENCE WITH THIS NEARLY CAUSED ME TO JACK KNIFE A TRAILER ON A STEEP SNOW COVERED DOWNGRADE. THIS IS NOT AN UNCOMMON PROBLEM THERE SEVERAL POST ABOUT IT AT HTTP://WWW.THEDIESELSTOP.COM/FORUMS/F149/, HTTP://WWW.POWERSTROKE.ORG/FORUM/6-7-TRANNY-PROBLEMS/ AND OTHERS, PROBABLY JUST THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG. DEALER ORIGINALLY DEALER SAID IT WAS NOT A PROBLEM NOW THEY SAY MY WARRANTY IS UP GIVE US $199.99 AND WE WILL DO UP TO TWO HOURS OF TESTING. THERE IS A TSB ON THIS BUT IT DOESN'T APPEAR TO WORK FOR EVERYONE. IF THIS WERE A RECALL FORD WOULD HAVE TO ADDRESS THE SAFETY OF ALL INVOLVED. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10443602
1,500 miles · Aug 23, 2011
Power Train
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD F-350. WHEN ATTEMPTING TO SHIFT BETWEEN GEARS THE VEHICLE WOULD HESITATE. THE VEHICLE WOULD ALSO DOWN SHIFT INTO NEUTRAL GEAR WHILE THE RPMS INCREASED BUT THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL DID NOT RESPOND. THE FAILURE OCCURRED INTERMITTENTLY SINCE THE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED IN AUGUST 2010. THE DEALER MADE …
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 FORD F-350. WHEN ATTEMPTING TO SHIFT BETWEEN GEARS THE VEHICLE WOULD HESITATE. THE VEHICLE WOULD ALSO DOWN SHIFT INTO NEUTRAL GEAR WHILE THE RPMS INCREASED BUT THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL DID NOT RESPOND. THE FAILURE OCCURRED INTERMITTENTLY SINCE THE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED IN AUGUST 2010. THE DEALER MADE TWO ATTEMPTS TO DUPLICATE THE FAILURE. THE PERFORMANCE WAS MONITORED BY THE DVR SYSTEM; HOWEVER, THE SYSTEM COULD NOT DETECT ANY CODES. THE MANUFACTURER WAS AWARE OF THE FAILURE; HOWEVER, THEY DID NOT OFFER ANY ASSISTANCE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 31,000. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 1,500.
PJ's Truck Bodies & Equipment Co., (PJ's) is recalling certain 2009-2013 Ford F-350, F-450, and F-550 Super Duty chassis modified by PJ's and equipped with certain Muncie Power Products PTO Assemblies. In the affected vehicles, oil may leak from the PTO pressure switch onto a thermal blanket covering the exhaust.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: The leaking oil may soak into the thermal blanket covering the exhaust, which when combined with heat from exhaust, may result in an increased risk of fire.
Remedy: PJ's has notified owners and dealers will install a new pressure switch kit that moves the switch away from the exhaust system, free of charge. The recall began on August 28, 2014. Owners may contact PJ's customer service at 1-866-475-8782.
Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2011-2012 F-350/450/550 Ambulance Package vehicles manufactured February 22, 2010, through October 19, 2012 and equipped with a 6.7L diesel engine. Due to an exhaust sensor problem, the vehicles may experience loss of power followed by an engine stall.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: An unexpected engine stall increases the risk of a crash. Additionally, if this were to occur when the ambulance is transporting a patient, there is an increased risk of injury to the patient.
Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the exhaust gas temperature sensor, free of charge. The recall began on November 25, 2013. Owners may contact Ford Motor Company Customer Relationship Center at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's recall campaign number is 13S10.
FORD IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2011 FORD F-150, F-250, F-350, F-450, F-550, EDGE, AND LINCOLN MKX TRUCKS MANUFACTURED FROM OCTOBER 25, 2010, THROUGH NOVEMBER 20, 2010. THESE VEHICLES WERE INSPECTED USING INTEGRATED DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM (IDS) THAT HAD A CUSTOM SOFTWARE ROUTINE TO READ THE SUSPECT BODY CONTROL MODULE (BCM) SERIAL NUMBER. BASED ON THE SERIAL NUMBER THE BCM WAS EITHER NOT AFFECTED OR REPLACED. THE CUSTOM SOFTWARE ROUTINE WAS NOT READING THE CORRECT SET OF CHARACTERS, AND WAS NOT ABLE TO IDENTIFY A BCM THAT REQUIRED REPLACEMENT AFFECTED BCMS MAY HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR AN INTERNAL SHORT.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF AN ELECTRICAL SHORT DEVELOPS, AN OVERHEATING CONDITION MAY OCCUR WHICH COULD RESULT IN A VEHICLE FIRE.
Remedy: DEALER WILL INSPECT THE BODY CONTROL MODULE AND IF NECESSARY REPLACE IT FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MARCH 7, 2011. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD MOTOR COMPANY CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP CENTER AT 1-866-436-7332.
FORD IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2011 F-150, F-250, F-350, F-450, F-550, EDGE AND LINCOLN MKX VEHICLES. DURING A SIX-DAY PRODUCTION PERIOD, THE SUPPLIER OF THE BODY CONTROL MODULE MANUFACTURED MODULES THAT MAY HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR AN INTERNAL SHORT.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF AN ELECTRICAL SHORT DEVELOPS, AN OVERHEATING CONDITION MAY OCCUR WHICH CAN RESULT IN AN UNATTENDED VEHICLE FIRE.
Remedy: DEALER WILL REPLACE THE BODY CONTROL MODULE IF NECESSARY FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON JANUARY 11, 2011. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-866-436-7332.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
1
RQ14005 · Vehicle Commanded Engine Shutdown
Opened Jan 13, 2015 · Closed Mar 15, 2016
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:software; Engine; Engine And Engine Cooling:engine:diesel; Engine And Engine Cooling:exhaust System; Engine And Engine Cooling:exhaust System:emission Control
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this RQ to investigate allegations that the scope and remedy of safety recall 13V-535 were inadequate. Recall 13V-535 was limited to a relatively small population of Ambulance Package vehicles and ODI received complaints of pickup trucks and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles being affected by the same defect. Ford manufactured approximately 555,985 subject vehicles between February 22, 2010 and January 30, 2015 that may be affected by defective EGT sensors and Powertrain Control Module (PCM) software calibration. The subject vehicles are equipped with four (4) EGT sensors to monitor engine operating conditions. An EGT sensor fault may produce false exhaust over-temperature signals. If these signals are produced, the Powertrain Control Module (PCM) implements a Failure Management Effects Mode (FMEM) and the driver receives a Stop Safely Now (SSN) system warning on the instrument cluster message center. The FMEM triggers a 70% reduction in available engine power over a period of no more than 45 seconds, during which it may not be possible to accelerate or maintain vehicle speed. The PCM then commands the engine to shut down when vehicle speed reaches approximately 1 mph. There is no immediate restart capability. Depending on the PCM software calibration, ignition key position and ambient temperature conditions, the engine may not restart until the end of a 10-60 minute cool down period.Ford and its component supplier(s) made numerous changes to the PCM software calibration and the design, material and manufacture of the EGT sensors over the period of subject vehicle production. This continuous product improvement affected vehicle performance regarding the alleged defect. Ford acknowledges the defect condition in the subject vehicles but argues that an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety is limited to Ambulance Package and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles where commanded shutdown could impact emergency response and patient care. Ford also argues that the defect trend is in decline. Ford also initiated a new safety recall (15V-175) to address the 13V-535 remedy concerns in the Ambulance Package vehicles and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles. The 15V-175 remedy reprograms the PCM with a new software calibration that stops a single EGT sensor fault to cause the vehicle to enter the FMEM shutdown mode.Ford also initiated an EPA emissions recall (14E03) for all subject vehicles that reprograms the PCM with the software calibration employed in safety recall 15V-175. Finally, Ford initiated a Customer Satisfaction Program (15M01) providing extended warranty coverage of 8 years or 80,000 miles for the the EGT sensors on certain MY2011-2012 subject vehicles.Due to the EPA emissions recall, that had a 66.6% completion rate in Ford's December 2015 progress report to the EPA, the defect trend is in decline. ODI is not aware of any crashes, deaths or injuries related to the alleged defect.ODI believes the alleged defect poses a safety risk but notes that the EPA emissions recall is addressing the safety problem.Compelling issuance of a duplicate recall would not represent a wise use of agency resources.Accordingly, this Recall Query is closed.This action is not a finding that no defect exists and NHTSA will take further action if such action is warranted.
Additional source detail variants (5)
Electrical System:software
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this RQ to investigate allegations that the scope and remedy of safety recall 13V-535 were inadequate. Recall 13V-535 was limited to a relatively small population of Ambulance Package vehicles and ODI received complaints of pickup trucks and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles being affected by the same defect. Ford manufactured approximately 555,985 subject vehicles between February 22, 2010 and January 30, 2015 that may be affected by defective EGT sensors and Powertrain Control Module (PCM) software calibration. The subject vehicles are equipped with four (4) EGT sensors to monitor engine operating conditions. An EGT sensor fault may produce false exhaust over-temperature signals. If these signals are produced, the Powertrain Control Module (PCM) implements a Failure Management Effects Mode (FMEM) and the driver receives a Stop Safely Now (SSN) system warning on the instrument cluster message center. The FMEM triggers a 70% reduction in available engine power over a period of no more than 45 seconds, during which it may not be possible to accelerate or maintain vehicle speed. The PCM then commands the engine to shut down when vehicle speed reaches approximately 1 mph. There is no immediate restart capability. Depending on the PCM software calibration, ignition key position and ambient temperature conditions, the engine may not restart until the end of a 10-60 minute cool down period.Ford and its component supplier(s) made numerous changes to the PCM software calibration and the design, material and manufacture of the EGT sensors over the period of subject vehicle production. This continuous product improvement affected vehicle performance regarding the alleged defect. Ford acknowledges the defect condition in the subject vehicles but argues that an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety is limited to Ambulance Package and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles where commanded shutdown could impact emergency response and patient care. Ford also argues that the defect trend is in decline. Ford also initiated a new safety recall (15V-175) to address the 13V-535 remedy concerns in the Ambulance Package vehicles and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles. The 15V-175 remedy reprograms the PCM with a new software calibration that stops a single EGT sensor fault to cause the vehicle to enter the FMEM shutdown mode.Ford also initiated an EPA emissions recall (14E03) for all subject vehicles that reprograms the PCM with the software calibration employed in safety recall 15V-175. Finally, Ford initiated a Customer Satisfaction Program (15M01) providing extended warranty coverage of 8 years or 80,000 miles for the the EGT sensors on certain MY2011-2012 subject vehicles.Due to the EPA emissions recall, that had a 66.6% completion rate in Ford's December 2015 progress report to the EPA, the defect trend is in decline. ODI is not aware of any crashes, deaths or injuries related to the alleged defect.ODI believes the alleged defect poses a safety risk but notes that the EPA emissions recall is addressing the safety problem.Compelling issuance of a duplicate recall would not represent a wise use of agency resources.Accordingly, this Recall Query is closed.This action is not a finding that no defect exists and NHTSA will take further action if such action is warranted.
Engine And Engine Cooling:engine:diesel
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this RQ to investigate allegations that the scope and remedy of safety recall 13V-535 were inadequate. Recall 13V-535 was limited to a relatively small population of Ambulance Package vehicles and ODI received complaints of pickup trucks and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles being affected by the same defect. Ford manufactured approximately 555,985 subject vehicles between February 22, 2010 and January 30, 2015 that may be affected by defective EGT sensors and Powertrain Control Module (PCM) software calibration. The subject vehicles are equipped with four (4) EGT sensors to monitor engine operating conditions. An EGT sensor fault may produce false exhaust over-temperature signals. If these signals are produced, the Powertrain Control Module (PCM) implements a Failure Management Effects Mode (FMEM) and the driver receives a Stop Safely Now (SSN) system warning on the instrument cluster message center. The FMEM triggers a 70% reduction in available engine power over a period of no more than 45 seconds, during which it may not be possible to accelerate or maintain vehicle speed. The PCM then commands the engine to shut down when vehicle speed reaches approximately 1 mph. There is no immediate restart capability. Depending on the PCM software calibration, ignition key position and ambient temperature conditions, the engine may not restart until the end of a 10-60 minute cool down period.Ford and its component supplier(s) made numerous changes to the PCM software calibration and the design, material and manufacture of the EGT sensors over the period of subject vehicle production. This continuous product improvement affected vehicle performance regarding the alleged defect. Ford acknowledges the defect condition in the subject vehicles but argues that an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety is limited to Ambulance Package and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles where commanded shutdown could impact emergency response and patient care. Ford also argues that the defect trend is in decline. Ford also initiated a new safety recall (15V-175) to address the 13V-535 remedy concerns in the Ambulance Package vehicles and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles. The 15V-175 remedy reprograms the PCM with a new software calibration that stops a single EGT sensor fault to cause the vehicle to enter the FMEM shutdown mode.Ford also initiated an EPA emissions recall (14E03) for all subject vehicles that reprograms the PCM with the software calibration employed in safety recall 15V-175. Finally, Ford initiated a Customer Satisfaction Program (15M01) providing extended warranty coverage of 8 years or 80,000 miles for the the EGT sensors on certain MY2011-2012 subject vehicles.Due to the EPA emissions recall, that had a 66.6% completion rate in Ford's December 2015 progress report to the EPA, the defect trend is in decline. ODI is not aware of any crashes, deaths or injuries related to the alleged defect.ODI believes the alleged defect poses a safety risk but notes that the EPA emissions recall is addressing the safety problem.Compelling issuance of a duplicate recall would not represent a wise use of agency resources.Accordingly, this Recall Query is closed.This action is not a finding that no defect exists and NHTSA will take further action if such action is warranted.
Engine And Engine Cooling:exhaust System:emission Control
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this RQ to investigate allegations that the scope and remedy of safety recall 13V-535 were inadequate. Recall 13V-535 was limited to a relatively small population of Ambulance Package vehicles and ODI received complaints of pickup trucks and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles being affected by the same defect. Ford manufactured approximately 555,985 subject vehicles between February 22, 2010 and January 30, 2015 that may be affected by defective EGT sensors and Powertrain Control Module (PCM) software calibration. The subject vehicles are equipped with four (4) EGT sensors to monitor engine operating conditions. An EGT sensor fault may produce false exhaust over-temperature signals. If these signals are produced, the Powertrain Control Module (PCM) implements a Failure Management Effects Mode (FMEM) and the driver receives a Stop Safely Now (SSN) system warning on the instrument cluster message center. The FMEM triggers a 70% reduction in available engine power over a period of no more than 45 seconds, during which it may not be possible to accelerate or maintain vehicle speed. The PCM then commands the engine to shut down when vehicle speed reaches approximately 1 mph. There is no immediate restart capability. Depending on the PCM software calibration, ignition key position and ambient temperature conditions, the engine may not restart until the end of a 10-60 minute cool down period.Ford and its component supplier(s) made numerous changes to the PCM software calibration and the design, material and manufacture of the EGT sensors over the period of subject vehicle production. This continuous product improvement affected vehicle performance regarding the alleged defect. Ford acknowledges the defect condition in the subject vehicles but argues that an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety is limited to Ambulance Package and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles where commanded shutdown could impact emergency response and patient care. Ford also argues that the defect trend is in decline. Ford also initiated a new safety recall (15V-175) to address the 13V-535 remedy concerns in the Ambulance Package vehicles and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles. The 15V-175 remedy reprograms the PCM with a new software calibration that stops a single EGT sensor fault to cause the vehicle to enter the FMEM shutdown mode.Ford also initiated an EPA emissions recall (14E03) for all subject vehicles that reprograms the PCM with the software calibration employed in safety recall 15V-175. Finally, Ford initiated a Customer Satisfaction Program (15M01) providing extended warranty coverage of 8 years or 80,000 miles for the the EGT sensors on certain MY2011-2012 subject vehicles.Due to the EPA emissions recall, that had a 66.6% completion rate in Ford's December 2015 progress report to the EPA, the defect trend is in decline. ODI is not aware of any crashes, deaths or injuries related to the alleged defect.ODI believes the alleged defect poses a safety risk but notes that the EPA emissions recall is addressing the safety problem.Compelling issuance of a duplicate recall would not represent a wise use of agency resources.Accordingly, this Recall Query is closed.This action is not a finding that no defect exists and NHTSA will take further action if such action is warranted.
Engine And Engine Cooling:exhaust System
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this RQ to investigate allegations that the scope and remedy of safety recall 13V-535 were inadequate. Recall 13V-535 was limited to a relatively small population of Ambulance Package vehicles and ODI received complaints of pickup trucks and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles being affected by the same defect. Ford manufactured approximately 555,985 subject vehicles between February 22, 2010 and January 30, 2015 that may be affected by defective EGT sensors and Powertrain Control Module (PCM) software calibration. The subject vehicles are equipped with four (4) EGT sensors to monitor engine operating conditions. An EGT sensor fault may produce false exhaust over-temperature signals. If these signals are produced, the Powertrain Control Module (PCM) implements a Failure Management Effects Mode (FMEM) and the driver receives a Stop Safely Now (SSN) system warning on the instrument cluster message center. The FMEM triggers a 70% reduction in available engine power over a period of no more than 45 seconds, during which it may not be possible to accelerate or maintain vehicle speed. The PCM then commands the engine to shut down when vehicle speed reaches approximately 1 mph. There is no immediate restart capability. Depending on the PCM software calibration, ignition key position and ambient temperature conditions, the engine may not restart until the end of a 10-60 minute cool down period.Ford and its component supplier(s) made numerous changes to the PCM software calibration and the design, material and manufacture of the EGT sensors over the period of subject vehicle production. This continuous product improvement affected vehicle performance regarding the alleged defect. Ford acknowledges the defect condition in the subject vehicles but argues that an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety is limited to Ambulance Package and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles where commanded shutdown could impact emergency response and patient care. Ford also argues that the defect trend is in decline. Ford also initiated a new safety recall (15V-175) to address the 13V-535 remedy concerns in the Ambulance Package vehicles and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles. The 15V-175 remedy reprograms the PCM with a new software calibration that stops a single EGT sensor fault to cause the vehicle to enter the FMEM shutdown mode.Ford also initiated an EPA emissions recall (14E03) for all subject vehicles that reprograms the PCM with the software calibration employed in safety recall 15V-175. Finally, Ford initiated a Customer Satisfaction Program (15M01) providing extended warranty coverage of 8 years or 80,000 miles for the the EGT sensors on certain MY2011-2012 subject vehicles.Due to the EPA emissions recall, that had a 66.6% completion rate in Ford's December 2015 progress report to the EPA, the defect trend is in decline. ODI is not aware of any crashes, deaths or injuries related to the alleged defect.ODI believes the alleged defect poses a safety risk but notes that the EPA emissions recall is addressing the safety problem.Compelling issuance of a duplicate recall would not represent a wise use of agency resources.Accordingly, this Recall Query is closed.This action is not a finding that no defect exists and NHTSA will take further action if such action is warranted.
Engine
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this RQ to investigate allegations that the scope and remedy of safety recall 13V-535 were inadequate. Recall 13V-535 was limited to a relatively small population of Ambulance Package vehicles and ODI received complaints of pickup trucks and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles being affected by the same defect. Ford manufactured approximately 555,985 subject vehicles between February 22, 2010 and January 30, 2015 that may be affected by defective EGT sensors and Powertrain Control Module (PCM) software calibration. The subject vehicles are equipped with four (4) EGT sensors to monitor engine operating conditions. An EGT sensor fault may produce false exhaust over-temperature signals. If these signals are produced, the Powertrain Control Module (PCM) implements a Failure Management Effects Mode (FMEM) and the driver receives a Stop Safely Now (SSN) system warning on the instrument cluster message center. The FMEM triggers a 70% reduction in available engine power over a period of no more than 45 seconds, during which it may not be possible to accelerate or maintain vehicle speed. The PCM then commands the engine to shut down when vehicle speed reaches approximately 1 mph. There is no immediate restart capability. Depending on the PCM software calibration, ignition key position and ambient temperature conditions, the engine may not restart until the end of a 10-60 minute cool down period.Ford and its component supplier(s) made numerous changes to the PCM software calibration and the design, material and manufacture of the EGT sensors over the period of subject vehicle production. This continuous product improvement affected vehicle performance regarding the alleged defect. Ford acknowledges the defect condition in the subject vehicles but argues that an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety is limited to Ambulance Package and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles where commanded shutdown could impact emergency response and patient care. Ford also argues that the defect trend is in decline. Ford also initiated a new safety recall (15V-175) to address the 13V-535 remedy concerns in the Ambulance Package vehicles and Fire Engine Prep Package vehicles. The 15V-175 remedy reprograms the PCM with a new software calibration that stops a single EGT sensor fault to cause the vehicle to enter the FMEM shutdown mode.Ford also initiated an EPA emissions recall (14E03) for all subject vehicles that reprograms the PCM with the software calibration employed in safety recall 15V-175. Finally, Ford initiated a Customer Satisfaction Program (15M01) providing extended warranty coverage of 8 years or 80,000 miles for the the EGT sensors on certain MY2011-2012 subject vehicles.Due to the EPA emissions recall, that had a 66.6% completion rate in Ford's December 2015 progress report to the EPA, the defect trend is in decline. ODI is not aware of any crashes, deaths or injuries related to the alleged defect.ODI believes the alleged defect poses a safety risk but notes that the EPA emissions recall is addressing the safety problem.Compelling issuance of a duplicate recall would not represent a wise use of agency resources.Accordingly, this Recall Query is closed.This action is not a finding that no defect exists and NHTSA will take further action if such action is warranted.
2011 Ford F-350 Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year
Illustration