← New search

2011 Ford Explorer

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2011 Ford Explorer do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 609.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

880 reports with mileage · 317 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Steering. Review the 742 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Structure. Review the 110 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 95 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

30 crash reports4 fire reports12 injury reports

Steering complaints

742 reports
Clear category filter
63,047 miles · Aug 7, 2013
Steering

THIS HAPPENED TO US 2 TIMES IN 2 WEEKS. POWER STEERING FAILURE LIGHT CAME ON ALONG WITH THE AUTO TRAC LIGHT. AT THIS POINT WE LOST POWER STEERING. WE WERE ON THE HIGHWAY AND WE WERE CLOSE TO A WALMART SO WE STOPPED AND LET THE CAR SIT AND WE WENT INTO WALMART .WHEN WE CAME OUT THE LIGHT WAS OFF AND THE POWER STEERING WAS FINE. M…

Read full complaint

THIS HAPPENED TO US 2 TIMES IN 2 WEEKS. POWER STEERING FAILURE LIGHT CAME ON ALONG WITH THE AUTO TRAC LIGHT. AT THIS POINT WE LOST POWER STEERING. WE WERE ON THE HIGHWAY AND WE WERE CLOSE TO A WALMART SO WE STOPPED AND LET THE CAR SIT AND WE WENT INTO WALMART .WHEN WE CAME OUT THE LIGHT WAS OFF AND THE POWER STEERING WAS FINE. MONDAY I WAS BACKING OUT OF MY GARAGE AND THE LIGHTS WENT ON AGAIN AND NO POWER STEERING. I WAS ABLE TO PULL THE CAR BACK INTO THE GARAGE AND THERE IT SITS. I CANT DRIVE IT AS IT IS TO HARD FOR ME TO TURN THE WHEEL. WE ARE TAKING IT INTO THE DEALER FRIDAY AND I CALLED THEM AND THEY HAVE NO RECALLS FOR THE CAR AND SAID THEY CANT FIND THE INFORMATION I FOUND ABOUT THE POWER STEERING THAT WAS REPORTED IN 2012. I AM JUST GLAD MY HUSBAND WAS DRIVING THE FIRST TIME. WE HAVE TRIED THE CAR SINCE MONDAY AND STILL NO POWER STEERING. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10534025

35,928 miles · Aug 6, 2013
Electrical SystemSteeringWheels

I WAS TRAVELING AT 40 MPH ON A BUSY CITY STREET WHEN ALL OF THE SUDDEN I HEARD A WARNING BING SOUND AND SAW THE POWER STEERING FAULT AND ALL TERRAIN MANAGEMENT FAILURE WARNINGS ON MY INSTRUMENT PANEL. LOST TOTAL ABILITY TO STEER THE VEHICLE AND HAD TO PUT ON EMERGENCY LIGHTS, STOP ON SIDE OF THE ROAD, TURN THE VEHICLE OFF AND ON…

Read full complaint

I WAS TRAVELING AT 40 MPH ON A BUSY CITY STREET WHEN ALL OF THE SUDDEN I HEARD A WARNING BING SOUND AND SAW THE POWER STEERING FAULT AND ALL TERRAIN MANAGEMENT FAILURE WARNINGS ON MY INSTRUMENT PANEL. LOST TOTAL ABILITY TO STEER THE VEHICLE AND HAD TO PUT ON EMERGENCY LIGHTS, STOP ON SIDE OF THE ROAD, TURN THE VEHICLE OFF AND ON (HOPING THAT IT WOULD RESET AND RESOLVE THE ISSUE) AND DOING THIS CLEARED THE WARNINGS AND I WAS ABLE TO STEER AGAIN. HOWEVER, TWO DAYS LATER THE PROBLEM HAPPENED AGAIN AFTER STARTING THE VEHICLE IN A PARKING LOT AND BEFORE STARTING TO BACK OUT OF THE PARKING SPACE. ONCE AGAIN TURNING THE VEHICLE OFF AND ON AGAIN RESET THE WARNING AND REGAINED STEERING ABILITY AGAIN. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10533937

51,000 miles · Aug 5, 2013
Steering

POWER STEERING ASSIST FAULT HAS HAPPENED 5 TIMES IN THE LAST MONTH AND THIS IS THE SECOND TIME I HAVE HAD IT AT THE DEALER. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10533731

10,100 miles · Aug 4, 2013
Power TrainSteeringSuspension

PLEASE REFERENCE PREVIOUS COMPLAINT CONFIRMATION NUMBER 10475098, SEPTEMBER 11, 2012. THE PROBLEM IS A COMPLETE LOSS OF POWER STEERING ASSIST THAT OCCURS INSTANTANEOUSLY, WITHOUT WARNING. THIS PROBLEM WAS SUPPOSEDLY REPAIRED BY MY FORD DEALER LAST FALL (SEPTEMBER, 2012) BY REPROGRAMMING A CONTROL UNIT. THE PROBLEM HAS NOW BEE…

Read full complaint

PLEASE REFERENCE PREVIOUS COMPLAINT CONFIRMATION NUMBER 10475098, SEPTEMBER 11, 2012. THE PROBLEM IS A COMPLETE LOSS OF POWER STEERING ASSIST THAT OCCURS INSTANTANEOUSLY, WITHOUT WARNING. THIS PROBLEM WAS SUPPOSEDLY REPAIRED BY MY FORD DEALER LAST FALL (SEPTEMBER, 2012) BY REPROGRAMMING A CONTROL UNIT. THE PROBLEM HAS NOW BEEN RECURRING AGAIN, ALMOST WEEKLY (THREE TIMES IN FOUR WEEKS). I FEEL THIS IS A VERY SERIOUS SAFETY ISSUE. DURING THE MOST RECENT INCIDENT, MY WIFE WAS DRIVING BY HERSELF. SHE DOES NOT HAVE THE STRENGTH TO DRIVE THIS CAR WITHOUT POWER STEERING ASSIST. LUCKILY SHE WAS TRAVELING IN A STRAIGHT LINE AND COULD BRING THE CAR TO A STOP. IF SHE HAD BEEN TURNING A CORNER OR ROUNDING A CURVE, SHE WOULD HAVE GONE OFF THE ROAD. I HAVE SEEN ON THE INTERNET THAT OTHER DRIVERS HAVE HAD THE SAME PROBLEM. I WILL TAKE THE CAR BACK TO THE DEALER, BUT FORD NEEDS TO OWN UP TO THIS PROBLEM AND FIGURE OUT A PERMANENT FIX. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10533476

49,700 miles · Aug 3, 2013
Steering

TRAVELLING ON THE FREEWAY AT 78 MPH, AN ALARM SOUNDED, FOLLOWED BY A MESSAGE THAT SAID "POWER STEERING ASSIST FAULT (OR FAILURE, I DON'T REMEMBER EXACTLY WHICH TERM WAS USED)", AT THE SAME TIME, I SUDDENLY HAD NO POWER STEERING. THE WARNING ALSO STATED "SERVICE ADVANCE TRAC" AND AN ICON SHOWING A CAR WITH SKID MARKS BEHIND IT, …

Read full complaint

TRAVELLING ON THE FREEWAY AT 78 MPH, AN ALARM SOUNDED, FOLLOWED BY A MESSAGE THAT SAID "POWER STEERING ASSIST FAULT (OR FAILURE, I DON'T REMEMBER EXACTLY WHICH TERM WAS USED)", AT THE SAME TIME, I SUDDENLY HAD NO POWER STEERING. THE WARNING ALSO STATED "SERVICE ADVANCE TRAC" AND AN ICON SHOWING A CAR WITH SKID MARKS BEHIND IT, DISPLAYED ON THE DASH. HAD MY WIFE, OR ONE OF MY CHILDREN BEEN DRIVING WHEN THIS OCCURED, I'M CERTAIN THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN A SERIOUS ACCIDENT. I WAS ABLE TO MANUEVER OFF THE FREEWAY AND TURN INTO A PARKING LOT. I HAD A CAR WITHOUT POWER STEERING WHEN I WAS VERY YOUNG, AND I DON'T RECALL IT BEING THIS DIFFICULT TO USE. I TURNED THE CAR OFF, AND GOOGLED THE ISSUE, TO FIND I'M NOT THE FIRST TO HAVE THIS HAPPEN. AFTER READING THAT IT RESETS, I RE-STARTED MY CAR AND THE POWER STEERING WAS BACK. IT TOOK A FEW SECONDS FOR THE "SERVICE ADVANCE TRAC" MESSAGE TO CLEAR, BUT IT DID AS WELL. I WAS ABLE TO DRIVE THE CAR AFTERWARD, FOR APPROXIMATELY 40 MILES, WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. THIS WAS ON A FRIDAY AFTERNOON, TOO LATE TO GET TO A DEALER. I WILL TAKE IT IN ON MONDAY MORNING, FIRST THING. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10533359

59,000 miles · Aug 1, 2013
Steering

AFTER FILLING UP WITH GAS, I STARTED AND WENT ABOUT 6 FEET AND THE CODES OF POWER STEERING ASSIST ALONG WITH A COUPLE OTHERS CAME UP. I TRIED RESTARTED THE EXPLORER AND IT DID THE SAME THING. I THEN LET IT SIT FOR 5 MINUTES AND RESTARTED IT AGAIN. THE SAME THING OCCURRED. I HAVE NOW BROUGHT IT IN AND AFTER LOOKING INTO IT. MANY …

Read full complaint

AFTER FILLING UP WITH GAS, I STARTED AND WENT ABOUT 6 FEET AND THE CODES OF POWER STEERING ASSIST ALONG WITH A COUPLE OTHERS CAME UP. I TRIED RESTARTED THE EXPLORER AND IT DID THE SAME THING. I THEN LET IT SIT FOR 5 MINUTES AND RESTARTED IT AGAIN. THE SAME THING OCCURRED. I HAVE NOW BROUGHT IT IN AND AFTER LOOKING INTO IT. MANY PEOPLE HAVE HAD THE SAME ISSUE. I HAD MY 1 YEAR OLD SON IN THE CAR AND TO BE HONEST. THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE THAT SHOULD BE TAKEN CARE OF BY THE MANUFACTURER. IF I WERE IN THE MIDDLE OF AN ON OR OFF RAMP IN A TURN. WHAT WOULD HAPPEN? *TR

NHTSA ODI #10533051

26,514 miles · Jul 30, 2013
Steering

MY WIFE AND I HAD JUST TRADED OUR CAR IN FOR A 2011 FORD EXPLORER. SHE WAS ON HER WAY HOME AND THE POWER STEERING LOCKED UP ON HER WITH A WARNING MESSAGE ON THE DASH. SHE WAS BARELY ABLE TO CONTROL THE VEHICLE FROM CRASHING INTO THE OTHER CARS AROUND HER. SHE TURNED OFF THE VEHICLE AND RESTARTED IT AND EVERYTHING RETURNED TO N…

Read full complaint

MY WIFE AND I HAD JUST TRADED OUR CAR IN FOR A 2011 FORD EXPLORER. SHE WAS ON HER WAY HOME AND THE POWER STEERING LOCKED UP ON HER WITH A WARNING MESSAGE ON THE DASH. SHE WAS BARELY ABLE TO CONTROL THE VEHICLE FROM CRASHING INTO THE OTHER CARS AROUND HER. SHE TURNED OFF THE VEHICLE AND RESTARTED IT AND EVERYTHING RETURNED TO NORMAL. WE CALLED THE DEALER WHO PROMPTLY HAD THE VEHICLE TOWED TO THE NEAREST DEALERSHIP. THEY REPLACED THE STEERING COLUMN AND EVERYTHING SEEMS FINE NOW. WHEN LOOKING UP THIS PROBLEM ONLINE WE FOUND THAT THIS WAS NOT THE FIRST TIME THIS HAPPENED AS FORD HAD SAID OVER THE PHONE TO ME. I POINTED OUT THAT THE NHTSA HAD AN ACTION # PE12017 FILED AND THIS WAS OBVIOUSLY NOT THE FIRST TIME THIS HAD HAPPENED. THEY BASICALLY CALLED ME A LIAR. FORD NEEDS TO DO A RECALL ON THIS ISSUE BEFORE SOMEONE OR GOD FORBID A FAMILY GETS KILLED DUE TO THIS ISSUE. MY WIFE AND STEPDAUGHTER ARE OK ONLY DUE TO THE QUICK THINKING OF MY WIFE. FORD NEEDS TO STEP UP AND CORRECT THIS ISSUE ASAP AND STAND BEHIND THEIR PRODUCT, NOT COVER UP THIS HUGE PROBLEM. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10532654

41,000 miles · Jul 26, 2013
Electronic Stability Control (esc)Steering

THE POWER STEERING GOES OUT AND THEN A WARNING APPEARS STATING A MALFUNCTION WITH THE ALL TERRAIN STABILITY CONTROL. NOT ONLY DOES THE POWER STEERING STOPS WORKING, BUT IT FEELS LIKE THE VEHICLE IS GOING TO TURN OVER FOR A COUPLE OF SECONDS. THIS HAS OCCURRED THREE TIMES; OUR FORD DEALERSHIP HAS MADE TWO ATTEMPTS TO REPAIR THE…

Read full complaint

THE POWER STEERING GOES OUT AND THEN A WARNING APPEARS STATING A MALFUNCTION WITH THE ALL TERRAIN STABILITY CONTROL. NOT ONLY DOES THE POWER STEERING STOPS WORKING, BUT IT FEELS LIKE THE VEHICLE IS GOING TO TURN OVER FOR A COUPLE OF SECONDS. THIS HAS OCCURRED THREE TIMES; OUR FORD DEALERSHIP HAS MADE TWO ATTEMPTS TO REPAIR THE PROBLEM WITH A THIRD ATTEMPT SCHEDULED NEXT WEEK. THE LAST EVENT WAS DAY BEFORE YESTERDAY WHILE I WAS DRIVING ON I-26 AT 70MPH (SPEED LIMIT) AND NEARLY CAUSED ME TO HAVE AN ACCIDENT. THE DEALERSHIP STATES THAT THEY JUST DON'T KNOW WHAT THE PROBLEM IS AND TOLD ME THEY ARE SPEAKING WITH FORD ABOUT THE PROBLEM. I FEEL THAT THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS PROBLEM AND I DON'T THINK FORD KNOWS HOW TO FIX IT. THANK YOU. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10531958

25,000 miles · Jul 26, 2013
Steering

2011 EXPLORER WAS PARKED, ENGINE RUNNING. ATTEMPTED TO BACK UP AND UNABLE TO STEER VEHICLE. POWER ASSIST FAILURE AND POWER STEERING FAIL LIGHTS CAME ON. I TURNED VEHICLE OFF, WAITING A FEW MINUTES, TURNED VEHICLE BACK ON, NO FURTHER WARNING LIGHTS CAME ON. WAS ABLE TO DRIVE NORMALLY. I DID NOT REPORT THIS INCIDENT TO FORD. …

Read full complaint

2011 EXPLORER WAS PARKED, ENGINE RUNNING. ATTEMPTED TO BACK UP AND UNABLE TO STEER VEHICLE. POWER ASSIST FAILURE AND POWER STEERING FAIL LIGHTS CAME ON. I TURNED VEHICLE OFF, WAITING A FEW MINUTES, TURNED VEHICLE BACK ON, NO FURTHER WARNING LIGHTS CAME ON. WAS ABLE TO DRIVE NORMALLY. I DID NOT REPORT THIS INCIDENT TO FORD. ABOUT A MONTH LATER I WAS SLOWING DOWN AT AN INTERSECTION AND THE SAME WARNING LIGHTS CAME ON. I WAS ABLE TO PULL OVER TO THE SIDE WITH MUCH DIFFICULTY IN STEERING. I CALLED MY LOCAL FORD DEALER, THEY SUGGESTED I CALL ROAD SIDE ASSISTANCE. I INFORMED THEM THIS HAPPENED TO ME A FEW WEEKS AGO AND I WAS ABLE TO DRIVE AFTER TURNING OFF THE CAR AND RESTARTING. I DID JUST THAT AND ONCE AGAIN WAS ABLE TO DRIVE MY VEHICLE. I BROUGHT MY VEHICLE TO LOCAL FORD DEALER. TWO DAYS LATER I RECEIVED A PHONE CALL FROM DEALER SAYING THEY WERE NOT ABLE TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM AND I COULD PICK UP THE VEHICLE. I INFORMED THEM SOMETHING WAS TERRIBLY WRONG AND THEY NEEDED TO DO MORE INVESTIGATING ON THIS PROBLEM BEFORE I WOULD PICK UP MY VEHICLE. SERVICE TECH SAID SHE WOULD LET THE SERVICE MANAGER KNOW. PLEASE HELP. THANK YOU. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10531923

76,981 miles · Jul 23, 2013
Steering

UPON BACKING DOWN DRIVEWAY, VEHICLE STEERING LOCKED UP AND WOULD NOT TURN. I STOPPED AND TURNED OFF THE IGNITION. THEN RESTARTED THE VEHICLE. POWER STEERING RETURNED. LEFT DRIVEWAY AND PROCEEDED TO NEXT INTERSECTION WHERE STEERING FAILED AGAIN AND LOCKED UP. THIS REPEATED ONCE AGAIN BEFORE MY HUSBAND HAD TO DRIVE VEHICLE WITHOUT…

Read full complaint

UPON BACKING DOWN DRIVEWAY, VEHICLE STEERING LOCKED UP AND WOULD NOT TURN. I STOPPED AND TURNED OFF THE IGNITION. THEN RESTARTED THE VEHICLE. POWER STEERING RETURNED. LEFT DRIVEWAY AND PROCEEDED TO NEXT INTERSECTION WHERE STEERING FAILED AGAIN AND LOCKED UP. THIS REPEATED ONCE AGAIN BEFORE MY HUSBAND HAD TO DRIVE VEHICLE WITHOUT POWER STEERING TO THE DEALERSHIP. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10531498

Official recalls

6

24V031000 · Structure:body:roof And Pillars

Jan 19, 2024

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2011-2019 Explorer vehicles. The A-pillar trim retention clips may not be properly engaged, allowing the trim to detach.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A detached trim piece can fall off the vehicle, becoming a road hazard and increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Dealers will inspect and replace the A-pillar trim as necessary, free of charge. This will be a phased campaign, with the remedy becoming available in different phases based on model years. Owner notification letters were mailed between July 18, 2024 and December 16, 2025. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 24S02.

21V746000 · Suspension:rear

Sep 22, 2021

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2011-2013 Explorer vehicles originally sold, or currently registered in Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. These vehicles may be equipped with a cross-axis ball joint (CABJ) replacement part that could seize, and result in a fracture of the outboard section of the rear suspension toe link.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A rear toe link fracture can result in a loss of steering control, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Dealer will inspect for the presence of a CABJ. If a CABJ of any design is found, the dealer will inspect the tightness of the CABJ, and replace the CABJ, knuckle, and/or toe link as necessary, free of charge. Interim notification letters were mailed November 10, 2021. Owner notification letters were mailed on March 17, 2022. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 21S43.

19V435000 · Suspension:rear

Jun 10, 2019

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2011-2017 Explorer vehicles. The rear suspension toe links may fracture due to stress on the rear suspension.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A fractured rear toe link will cause a sudden change in vehicle handling and increase the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the rear suspension toe links, and inspect both rear toe link ball joints, replacing the rear wheel knuckle(s), if necessary, free of charge. The recall began June 26, 2019. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 19S17.

15V171000 · Structure:body:door

Mar 24, 2015

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2011-2013 Explorer vehicles. In the affected vehicles, the interior door handle return spring may unseat, resulting in interior door handle that does not return to the fully stowed position after actuation.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the interior door handle return spring is unseated, the door may unlatch in the event of a side impact crash, increasing the risk of personal injury.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will inspect all four of the interior door handles and either repair or replace them, free of charge. The recall began on July 23, 2015. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 15S11.

14V286000 · Steering:electric Power Assist System

May 29, 2014

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2011-2013 Ford Explorer vehicles manufactured May 17, 2010, through February 28, 2012. The affected vehicles may experience an intermittent connection in the electric power steering gear, which can cause a loss of the motor position sensor signal resulting in a shut down of the power steering assist.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the vehicle experiences a loss of power steering assist it will require extra steering effort at lower speeds, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will update the Power Steering Control Module (PSCM) software, free of charge. If a vehicle shows a history of a loss of motor position sensor signal when the vehicle is brought in for the recall remedy, its steering rack assembly will be replaced, free of charge. The recall began on July 23, 2014. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-800-392-3673. Ford's number for this recall is 14S06.

11V063000 · Seats

Feb 2, 2011

FORD IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2011 EXPLORER VEHICLES MANUFACTURED FROM JULY 15, 2010, THROUGH DECEMBER 13, 2010, EQUIPPED WITH SECOND ROW 60% SEATS WITH MANUAL RECLINER MECHANISMS THAT MAY HAVE COMPONENTS THAT ARE OUT OF DIMENSIONAL SPECIFICATION. THESE SEATS FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 207, "SEATING SYSTEMS."

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH, THE SEAT BACK MAY NOT PROVIDE THE REQUIRED STRENGTH, INCREASING THE RISK OF INJURY.

Remedy: FORD WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND DEALERS WILL REPAIR THE SEATS FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON FEBRUARY 15, 2011. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD MOTOR COMPANY CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP CENTER AT 1-866-436-7332.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

4

PE23001 · Windshield Trim Molding Item Detachment

Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Feb 8, 2024

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Structure:body:roof And Pillars

On January 27, 2023, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened PE23-001 to investigate allegations of A-pillar trim panel detachment on model year (MY) 2011-2019 Ford Explorer vehicles. At the time of opening, the office had received 164 Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (VOQs) reporting this failure. ODI has received 671 VOQs regarding this failure, including 1 alleged crash and 2 alleged injuries. Some consumers have reported that the failure occurred while they were driving at highway speeds, with the detached trim panel entering the path of travel of the vehicle behind them, requiring the driver of the following vehicle to take evasive action. It is noteworthy that motorists who experience this type of road hazard are less likely to accurately identify the subject vehicle the item detached from and report the event to the NHTSA. In its April 17, 2023 response to ODI’s information request, Ford provided 175 consumer complaints (including field reports) and 14,162 warranty claims related to A-pillar trim panel detachment. Ford relayed that the subject vehicles utilize a plastic A-pillar bracket, which is bolted to the vehicle structure during assembly. The A-pillar trim panel is attached to the bracket utilizing 7 plastic clips. Contributory factors which have been identified by Ford as leading to the subject defect include incomplete installation at the assembly plant, inadequate part stack up, damage to fasteners during installation, and failure to follow proper repair procedure during windshield replacements or other services. On January 19, 2024, Ford filed safety recall 24V-031 for MY 2011-2019 Ford Explorer vehicles to address the subject defect. In the Part 573 Safety Recall Report, Ford identified that a detached A-pillar trim panel can create a road hazard for other road users, increasing the risk of a crash. The recall remedy includes an inspection of the existing A-pillar trim panel and, if necessary, the replacement of the component. The remedy A-pillar trim panels will be installed with an additional adhesive for robustness and utilize an inspection procedure to ensure full engagement of all the retention clips during installation. In view of the recall action being taken by Ford, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. The agency reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances. To review the reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.

EA17002 · Exhaust Odor In Passenger Cab

Opened Jul 27, 2017 · Closed Jan 17, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Engine And Engine Cooling:exhaust System:manifold/header/muffler/tail Pipe; Structure:body

During the EA17-002 investigation, the agency reviewed and analyzed reports of exhaust odors in the passenger cabins of Model Year 2011 to 2017 Ford Explorers. This investigation required an approach that incorporated knowledge and expertise from the automotive, medical, environmental health, and occupational safety fields. The agency conducted an in-depth investigation that encompassed the review of over 6,500 consumer complaints, conducting field inspections, and testing the relevant vehicles, both independently and in coordination with Ford and other entities. During the investigation, the evolution of Ford service bulletins intended to reduce the level of exhaust odors and carbon monoxide (CO) entering the occupant compartment was examined and independent tests to evaluate the effectiveness of the final Field Service Actions (FSA) for both consumer and police vehicles were conducted. As part of the investigation, the agency also examined the effects of cracked exhaust mani-cats on the measured CO levels in the vehicles and tested the FSA repairs to ensure they did not adversely impact occupant compartment CO levels due to cracked mani-cats.The investigation identified upfitting issues for Police Interceptor vehicles. Upfitting (sirens, lights, cages, auxiliary power, etc.) is typically performed by governmental fleet operations, independent repair facilities, or local Ford dealers after the sale of the new vehicle. Sealing issues caused by upfitting were responsible for the highest measured carbon monoxide levels in tested vehicles. The police FSA instructs how to inspect the quality of the vehicle upfits and how to properly seal any leaks caused by these upfits, at no cost to the police agency. Similarly, the highest CO levels measured in consumer vehicles were usually traced to sealing issues caused by rear crash damage where the repairs did not ensure sealing integrity. The most recent Ford FSA procedure for both the police (17B25) and consumer vehicles (17N03) includes an HVAC reprogramming operation. Tests by Ford and NHTSA have demonstrated a substantial reduction of CO levels due solely to the HVAC reprogramming. Other FSA repairs also demonstrated measurable contributions to CO level reductions during controlled tests.Throughout the investigation, vehicles accurately measured with higher levels of carbon monoxide were almost always affected by upfitter alterations, damage, or other causes compromising rear passenger cabin seals.NHTSA received thousands of reports alleging odors which triggered a variety of physiological responses, predominately nausea, headaches, and lightheadedness. NHTSA focused the investigation on accurately measuring vehicle CO levels, and accurately measuring carboxyhemoglobin (COHB) levels from properly administered blood tests. Using rigorous test methods to produce exhaust gas intrusion in vehicles with a properly performed FSA, occupant compartment CO levels remained below current environmental limits for CO in any environment (EPA ambient air quality standards). Furthermore, even without FSA repairs, no vehicles unaffected by upfitter issues or prior crash damage were identified with CO levels that exceed accepted occupational CO exposure levels. This investigation finds that the 2011-2017 Ford Explorer vehicles when accurately measured produce occupant compartment CO levels which fall below current accepted health standards, and could not identify COHB levels for vehicle drivers or other occupants, which exceeded thresholds for acute physiological effects. Therefore, the agency has not identified a defect that represents an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety.This inve

Additional source detail variants (2)

Engine And Engine Cooling:exhaust System:manifold/header/muffler/tail Pipe

During the EA17-002 investigation, the agency reviewed and analyzed reports of exhaust odors in the passenger cabins of Model Year 2011 to 2017 Ford Explorers. This investigation required an approach that incorporated knowledge and expertise from the automotive, medical, environmental health, and occupational safety fields. The agency conducted an in-depth investigation that encompassed the review of over 6,500 consumer complaints, conducting field inspections, and testing the relevant vehicles, both independently and in coordination with Ford and other entities. During the investigation, the evolution of Ford service bulletins intended to reduce the level of exhaust odors and carbon monoxide (CO) entering the occupant compartment was examined and independent tests to evaluate the effectiveness of the final Field Service Actions (FSA) for both consumer and police vehicles were conducted. As part of the investigation, the agency also examined the effects of cracked exhaust mani-cats on the measured CO levels in the vehicles and tested the FSA repairs to ensure they did not adversely impact occupant compartment CO levels due to cracked mani-cats.The investigation identified upfitting issues for Police Interceptor vehicles. Upfitting (sirens, lights, cages, auxiliary power, etc.) is typically performed by governmental fleet operations, independent repair facilities, or local Ford dealers after the sale of the new vehicle. Sealing issues caused by upfitting were responsible for the highest measured carbon monoxide levels in tested vehicles. The police FSA instructs how to inspect the quality of the vehicle upfits and how to properly seal any leaks caused by these upfits, at no cost to the police agency. Similarly, the highest CO levels measured in consumer vehicles were usually traced to sealing issues caused by rear crash damage where the repairs did not ensure sealing integrity. The most recent Ford FSA procedure for both the police (17B25) and consumer vehicles (17N03) includes an HVAC reprogramming operation. Tests by Ford and NHTSA have demonstrated a substantial reduction of CO levels due solely to the HVAC reprogramming. Other FSA repairs also demonstrated measurable contributions to CO level reductions during controlled tests.Throughout the investigation, vehicles accurately measured with higher levels of carbon monoxide were almost always affected by upfitter alterations, damage, or other causes compromising rear passenger cabin seals.NHTSA received thousands of reports alleging odors which triggered a variety of physiological responses, predominately nausea, headaches, and lightheadedness. NHTSA focused the investigation on accurately measuring vehicle CO levels, and accurately measuring carboxyhemoglobin (COHB) levels from properly administered blood tests. Using rigorous test methods to produce exhaust gas intrusion in vehicles with a properly performed FSA, occupant compartment CO levels remained below current environmental limits for CO in any environment (EPA ambient air quality standards). Furthermore, even without FSA repairs, no vehicles unaffected by upfitter issues or prior crash damage were identified with CO levels that exceed accepted occupational CO exposure levels. This investigation finds that the 2011-2017 Ford Explorer vehicles when accurately measured produce occupant compartment CO levels which fall below current accepted health standards, and could not identify COHB levels for vehicle drivers or other occupants, which exceeded thresholds for acute physiological effects. Therefore, the agency has not identified a defect that represents an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety.This inve

Structure:body

During the EA17-002 investigation, the agency reviewed and analyzed reports of exhaust odors in the passenger cabins of Model Year 2011 to 2017 Ford Explorers. This investigation required an approach that incorporated knowledge and expertise from the automotive, medical, environmental health, and occupational safety fields. The agency conducted an in-depth investigation that encompassed the review of over 6,500 consumer complaints, conducting field inspections, and testing the relevant vehicles, both independently and in coordination with Ford and other entities. During the investigation, the evolution of Ford service bulletins intended to reduce the level of exhaust odors and carbon monoxide (CO) entering the occupant compartment was examined and independent tests to evaluate the effectiveness of the final Field Service Actions (FSA) for both consumer and police vehicles were conducted. As part of the investigation, the agency also examined the effects of cracked exhaust mani-cats on the measured CO levels in the vehicles and tested the FSA repairs to ensure they did not adversely impact occupant compartment CO levels due to cracked mani-cats.The investigation identified upfitting issues for Police Interceptor vehicles. Upfitting (sirens, lights, cages, auxiliary power, etc.) is typically performed by governmental fleet operations, independent repair facilities, or local Ford dealers after the sale of the new vehicle. Sealing issues caused by upfitting were responsible for the highest measured carbon monoxide levels in tested vehicles. The police FSA instructs how to inspect the quality of the vehicle upfits and how to properly seal any leaks caused by these upfits, at no cost to the police agency. Similarly, the highest CO levels measured in consumer vehicles were usually traced to sealing issues caused by rear crash damage where the repairs did not ensure sealing integrity. The most recent Ford FSA procedure for both the police (17B25) and consumer vehicles (17N03) includes an HVAC reprogramming operation. Tests by Ford and NHTSA have demonstrated a substantial reduction of CO levels due solely to the HVAC reprogramming. Other FSA repairs also demonstrated measurable contributions to CO level reductions during controlled tests.Throughout the investigation, vehicles accurately measured with higher levels of carbon monoxide were almost always affected by upfitter alterations, damage, or other causes compromising rear passenger cabin seals.NHTSA received thousands of reports alleging odors which triggered a variety of physiological responses, predominately nausea, headaches, and lightheadedness. NHTSA focused the investigation on accurately measuring vehicle CO levels, and accurately measuring carboxyhemoglobin (COHB) levels from properly administered blood tests. Using rigorous test methods to produce exhaust gas intrusion in vehicles with a properly performed FSA, occupant compartment CO levels remained below current environmental limits for CO in any environment (EPA ambient air quality standards). Furthermore, even without FSA repairs, no vehicles unaffected by upfitter issues or prior crash damage were identified with CO levels that exceed accepted occupational CO exposure levels. This investigation finds that the 2011-2017 Ford Explorer vehicles when accurately measured produce occupant compartment CO levels which fall below current accepted health standards, and could not identify COHB levels for vehicle drivers or other occupants, which exceeded thresholds for acute physiological effects. Therefore, the agency has not identified a defect that represents an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety.This inve

PE16008 · Ford Explorer Exhaust Odor

Opened Jul 1, 2016 · Closed Sep 12, 2017

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Engine And Engine Cooling:exhaust System; Structure:body

During the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration?s (NHTSA?s) investigation into the Ford carbon monoxide allegations, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) identified additional Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) reports with similar exhaust odor claims.Presently, ODI has identified 791 VOQs for Model Year 2011-2017 Ford Explorers pertaining to exhaust odor claims.ODI has identified three crashes and 41 injuries potentially linked this issue.The reported injuries range from unspecified to loss of consciousness, with the majority being nausea, headaches, or dizziness ? all of which can be symptomatic of carbon monoxide exposure.Additionally, Ford provided 2,400 reports including owner complaints, warranty claims, dealer field reports, and legal claims, that involve 2,051 vehicles that may be connected to the exhaust odor issue.NHTSA's Vehicle Test and Research Center tested multiple vehicles, including complaint vehicles, during the investigation.ODI also conducted field inspections of complaint vehicles and crashes involving police units that occurred while the officers were on duty.When possible, data was collected to quantify carbon monoxide levels in the examined vehicles.Based on the information gathered to date, NHTSA upgraded this investigation to an Engineering Analysis (EA17-002).

Additional source detail variants (2)

Engine And Engine Cooling:exhaust System

During the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration?s (NHTSA?s) investigation into the Ford carbon monoxide allegations, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) identified additional Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) reports with similar exhaust odor claims.Presently, ODI has identified 791 VOQs for Model Year 2011-2017 Ford Explorers pertaining to exhaust odor claims.ODI has identified three crashes and 41 injuries potentially linked this issue.The reported injuries range from unspecified to loss of consciousness, with the majority being nausea, headaches, or dizziness ? all of which can be symptomatic of carbon monoxide exposure.Additionally, Ford provided 2,400 reports including owner complaints, warranty claims, dealer field reports, and legal claims, that involve 2,051 vehicles that may be connected to the exhaust odor issue.NHTSA's Vehicle Test and Research Center tested multiple vehicles, including complaint vehicles, during the investigation.ODI also conducted field inspections of complaint vehicles and crashes involving police units that occurred while the officers were on duty.When possible, data was collected to quantify carbon monoxide levels in the examined vehicles.Based on the information gathered to date, NHTSA upgraded this investigation to an Engineering Analysis (EA17-002).

Structure:body

During the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration?s (NHTSA?s) investigation into the Ford carbon monoxide allegations, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) identified additional Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) reports with similar exhaust odor claims.Presently, ODI has identified 791 VOQs for Model Year 2011-2017 Ford Explorers pertaining to exhaust odor claims.ODI has identified three crashes and 41 injuries potentially linked this issue.The reported injuries range from unspecified to loss of consciousness, with the majority being nausea, headaches, or dizziness ? all of which can be symptomatic of carbon monoxide exposure.Additionally, Ford provided 2,400 reports including owner complaints, warranty claims, dealer field reports, and legal claims, that involve 2,051 vehicles that may be connected to the exhaust odor issue.NHTSA's Vehicle Test and Research Center tested multiple vehicles, including complaint vehicles, during the investigation.ODI also conducted field inspections of complaint vehicles and crashes involving police units that occurred while the officers were on duty.When possible, data was collected to quantify carbon monoxide levels in the examined vehicles.Based on the information gathered to date, NHTSA upgraded this investigation to an Engineering Analysis (EA17-002).

PE12017 · Electric Power Steering Failure

Opened Jun 19, 2012 · Closed Jun 12, 2014

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Steering:electric Power Assist System

On May 27, 2014 and amended June 2, 2014, Ford Motor Company (Ford) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA describing a safety defect that may result in a sudden loss of power steering assist in approximately 179,027 model year (MY) 2011 through 2013 Ford Explorer vehicles equipped with electric power assisted steering (EPAS), including 82,328 MY 2011 Explorersthat are the subject of PE12-017.Ford has assigned the recall number 14S06.The NHTSA recall number is 14V-286.Ford's DIR indicates that loss of power steering assist while driving would require higher steering effort at lower vehicle speeds, which may result in an increased risk of a crash.Sudden loss of power steering assist while driving can occur in the subject vehicles if the system loses electrical power or whenever the system detects a fault that requires it to enter fail-safe mode, which removes power from the EPAS motor and defaults to manual steering.Ford's DIR indicates that the majority of steering assist failures in the recalled vehicles have been caused by an intermittent electrical connection in the Power Steering Control Module (PSCM) that can lead to a loss of the motor position sensor signal.Ford's remedy instructs dealers to check the PSCM for diagnostic trouble codes (DTC).If upon initial inspection a loss of steering assist DTC is present, dealers will replace the steering gear at no charge to the owner and update the PSCM with revised software.Following detection of a motor position sensor signal fault, the revised software will provide audible and visual warnings to the driver that a power steering system fault has been detected and will maintain steering assist for the remainder of that drive cycle.If no DTC is present, dealers will reprogram the PSCM with the revised software. Analysis of information from all sources identified a total of 969 complaints and 4,059 warranty claims related to loss of power steering assist while driving in the MY 2011 through 2012 Explorer vehicles, resulting in a complaint rate of 5.4 incidents per thousand vehicles and a warranty claim rate of 2.3 percent.ODI identified 15 crashes with evidence indicating loss of power steering assist may have been a factor.All 15 crashes involved low-speed impacts with roadside objects during turning maneuvers, resulting in minor vehicle damage or no damage.In one incident that occurred in a low-speed curve, the driver attempted to brake in response to the sudden increase in steering effort and inadvertently applied the accelerator pedal instead.This caused the vehicle to run off the side of the road and strike a wooden pole at approximately 15 mph.Another incident occurred when the driver was unable to to negotiate a left-turn at an intersection and ran off the road into a shallow ditch, resulting in moderate front-end damage to the vehicle and minor injuries to the driver that did not require medical treatment. This investigation is closed.All ODI complaints associated with this closing resume are listed in the Attachment 1.

Go deeper into Ford Explorer problems