← New search

2013 Ford Edge

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Edge years

Owner complaints for the 2013 Ford Edge are substantially higher than the model-year median of 724.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

1,793 reports with mileage · 651 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Electrical System. Review the 854 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 529 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Structure. Review the 300 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

33 crash reports7 fire reports24 injury reports

Service Brakes complaints

529 reports
Clear category filter
82,000 miles · Jun 28, 2019
Service Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2013 FORD EDGE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE BRAKES MALFUNCTIONED WHILE DRIVING 40 MPH. THE CONTACT HAD TO DEPRESS THE BRAKE PEDAL WITH FORCE TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO DITSCHMAN/FLEMINGTON FORD LINCOLN (215 US-202, FLEMINGTON, NJ 08822, (908) 905-0317) WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE BRA…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2013 FORD EDGE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE BRAKES MALFUNCTIONED WHILE DRIVING 40 MPH. THE CONTACT HAD TO DEPRESS THE BRAKE PEDAL WITH FORCE TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO DITSCHMAN/FLEMINGTON FORD LINCOLN (215 US-202, FLEMINGTON, NJ 08822, (908) 905-0317) WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE BRAKE BOOSTER NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED, PROVIDED A CASE NUMBER, AND STATED THAT THE VIN WAS NOT INCLUDED IN A RECALL. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 82,000. *BF *TR

NHTSA ODI #11223135

87,000 miles · Jun 26, 2019
Service Brakes

AS I WAS COMING TO A STOPLIGHT IN THE CITY AT ABOUT 25-30 MPH, MY BRAKES ENGAGED FOR ABOUT A QUARTER OF A SECOND, THEN GAVE OUT ALMOST ENTIRELY. I HAD TO PUMP BRAKES AND HIT THE EMERGENCY BRAKES TO STOP FROM HITTING A STOPPED AT AN INTERSECTION. THANKFULLY I BRAKE EARLY AND STOPPED SHORT A FEW INCHES. AFTER INSPECTION THE CULPRI…

Read full complaint

AS I WAS COMING TO A STOPLIGHT IN THE CITY AT ABOUT 25-30 MPH, MY BRAKES ENGAGED FOR ABOUT A QUARTER OF A SECOND, THEN GAVE OUT ALMOST ENTIRELY. I HAD TO PUMP BRAKES AND HIT THE EMERGENCY BRAKES TO STOP FROM HITTING A STOPPED AT AN INTERSECTION. THANKFULLY I BRAKE EARLY AND STOPPED SHORT A FEW INCHES. AFTER INSPECTION THE CULPRIT IS THE MASTER BRAKE CYLINDER.

NHTSA ODI #11222751

134,600 miles · Jun 20, 2019
Service Brakes

BRAKE VACUUM BOOSTER HAS FAILED. BRAKE STOPPING EFFORT CHANGES WITH ENGINE RPM. AT LOW ENGINE SPEEDS, THE CAR APPEARS TO HAVE NO BRAKES. NO WARNING LIGHTS ARE GIVEN TO OPERATOR TO KNOW THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH BRAKES. FORD HAS A VOLUNTARY SERVICE ACTION (13N02)TO CARS BUILT UNTIL MARCH 2013, BUT PROBLEM STILL EXIST IN CAR BUI…

Read full complaint

BRAKE VACUUM BOOSTER HAS FAILED. BRAKE STOPPING EFFORT CHANGES WITH ENGINE RPM. AT LOW ENGINE SPEEDS, THE CAR APPEARS TO HAVE NO BRAKES. NO WARNING LIGHTS ARE GIVEN TO OPERATOR TO KNOW THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH BRAKES. FORD HAS A VOLUNTARY SERVICE ACTION (13N02)TO CARS BUILT UNTIL MARCH 2013, BUT PROBLEM STILL EXIST IN CAR BUILT IN MAY

NHTSA ODI #11221428

78,520 miles · Jun 20, 2019
Service Brakes

AFTER HITTING A BUMP, POT HOLE, ETC. THE PEDAL GOES TO THE FLOOR AND IS SLOW TO STOP, CURRENTLY, THE PEDAL GOES ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR AND IS SLOW TO STOP, WHICH FROM WHAT I HAVE READ IS A COMMON PROBLEM,WITH THE HCU AND/OR POWER BREAK BOOSTER BUT NO OFFICIAL RECALL HAS BEEN ISSUED. ALTHOUGH THIS HAPPENED ONCE OR TWICE IN DEC…

Read full complaint

AFTER HITTING A BUMP, POT HOLE, ETC. THE PEDAL GOES TO THE FLOOR AND IS SLOW TO STOP, CURRENTLY, THE PEDAL GOES ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR AND IS SLOW TO STOP, WHICH FROM WHAT I HAVE READ IS A COMMON PROBLEM,WITH THE HCU AND/OR POWER BREAK BOOSTER BUT NO OFFICIAL RECALL HAS BEEN ISSUED. ALTHOUGH THIS HAPPENED ONCE OR TWICE IN DECEMBER OF 2018, IT HAS HAPPENED TWICE IN THE MONTH OF JUNE 2019 AND NOW IS CURRENTLY NOT IMPROVING.

NHTSA ODI #11221376

Mileage unknown · Jun 13, 2019
Service Brakes

MY MECHANIC HAS INFORMED ME THAT MY MASTER CYLINDERS ARE BAD. THAT THIS PART ON THE FORD EDGE LEAKS FLUID INTO THE POWER BOOSTER WHICH COMPROMISES THE BOOSTER'S DIAPHRAGM AND IS UNDER A CURRENT RECALL WITH FORD. I HAD MY POWER BOOSTER REPLACED LAST OCTOBER, BECAUSE MY BRAKE PEDAL WOULD BECOME STIFF AND DIFFICULT TO DEPRESS. SINC…

Read full complaint

MY MECHANIC HAS INFORMED ME THAT MY MASTER CYLINDERS ARE BAD. THAT THIS PART ON THE FORD EDGE LEAKS FLUID INTO THE POWER BOOSTER WHICH COMPROMISES THE BOOSTER'S DIAPHRAGM AND IS UNDER A CURRENT RECALL WITH FORD. I HAD MY POWER BOOSTER REPLACED LAST OCTOBER, BECAUSE MY BRAKE PEDAL WOULD BECOME STIFF AND DIFFICULT TO DEPRESS. SINCE HAVING THE BOOSTERS REPLACED, I HAVE THE OPPOSITE PROBLEM. THE BRAKE PEDAL DEPRESSES ALMOST TO THE FLOOR BEFORE ENGAGING. BECAUSE THE MASTER CYLINDER AND BRAKE BOOSTER WORK IN TANDEM, IT MAKES NO SENSE TO REPLACE ONE WITHOUT REPLACING THE OTHER, ESPECIALLY SINCE IT HAS BEEN NOTED THAT THE MASTER CYLINDER IS THE CAUSATION OF THE POWER BOOSTER'S FAILURE. I IMPLORE YOU TO ISSUE A CORRESPONDING RECALL FOR THE MASTER CYLINDER OR AMMEND THE RECALL ON THE POWER BOOSTER TO INCLUDE THIS COMPONENT.

NHTSA ODI #11219782

75,000 miles · Jun 13, 2019
Service Brakes

BRAKES ARE NOT WORKING PROPERLY. WHEN I PUSH DOWN ON BRAKES IT FEELS VERY SPONGY LIKE THERE'S AIR STUCK IN THERE. MAKES A HISSING SOUND. I STEP ON THE BRAKES AND IT FEELS LIKE THE CAR KEEPS ROLLING. AND I HAVE TO SLAM ON THE BRAKES.

NHTSA ODI #11219705

71,000 miles · Jun 10, 2019
Service Brakes

SMALL TEAR IN BREAK BOOSTER. FORD KNOWS ABOUT THIS ISSUE AND COVERED A LOT OF VEHICLES IN THE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION PROGRAM 13N02. MY CAR IS NOT COVERED EVEN THOUGH IT WAS MADE AT THE SAME FACTORY DURING THE SAME TIME PERIOD OF THE ONES THAT WERE COVERED. IT WAS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS WHEN IT BROKE AND ALMOST CAUSED ME TO GET IN AN…

Read full complaint

SMALL TEAR IN BREAK BOOSTER. FORD KNOWS ABOUT THIS ISSUE AND COVERED A LOT OF VEHICLES IN THE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION PROGRAM 13N02. MY CAR IS NOT COVERED EVEN THOUGH IT WAS MADE AT THE SAME FACTORY DURING THE SAME TIME PERIOD OF THE ONES THAT WERE COVERED. IT WAS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS WHEN IT BROKE AND ALMOST CAUSED ME TO GET IN AN ACCIDENT. FORD HAS REFUSED TO DO ANYTHING EVEN THOUGH THIS IS CLEARLY AN ISSUE. I FOUND A LARGE AMOUNT OF DRIVERS THAT HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM I DO WITH THEIR 2013 FORD EDGES THAT WERE NOT COVERED BY FORD.

NHTSA ODI #11219123

90,000 miles · Jun 5, 2019
Service Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2013 FORD EDGE. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 25 MPH AND ATTEMPTING TO STOP THE VEHICLE, THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED AND FELT EXTREMELY STIFF. IN ORDER TO AVOID A COLLISION, THE VEHICLE WAS SHIFTED INTO PARK. THE CONTACT MENTIONED THAT THE FAILURE OCCURRED ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS. IN ORDER FOR THE VEHICLE TO …

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2013 FORD EDGE. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 25 MPH AND ATTEMPTING TO STOP THE VEHICLE, THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED AND FELT EXTREMELY STIFF. IN ORDER TO AVOID A COLLISION, THE VEHICLE WAS SHIFTED INTO PARK. THE CONTACT MENTIONED THAT THE FAILURE OCCURRED ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS. IN ORDER FOR THE VEHICLE TO STOP, IT WAS SHIFTED INTO PARK OR THE IGNITION WAS TURNED OFF. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO TWO INDEPENDENT MECHANICS WHO TEST DROVE THE VEHICLE AND INFORMED THE CONTACT THAT THE POWER BRAKE BOOSTER NEEDED TO BE REPAIRED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO JOE COOPER FORD YUKON (1780 GARTH BROOKS BLVD, YUKON, OK 73099, (405) 354-1111), BUT THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE AND INFORMED THE CONTACT TO CALL NHTSA. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 90,000.

NHTSA ODI #11218081

125,000 miles · Jun 4, 2019
Service Brakes

THERE IS A FORD CUSTOMER SATISFACTION PROGRAM 13N02 2013-2013 FORD EDGE, BUT MY 2013 FORD EDGE IS NOT COVERED. NOW I AM HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THE BRAKE BOOSTER AND FORD WILL NOT HELP ME. I HAVE 125,000 MILES, SO SHOULD BE COVERED, BUT FORD SAYS NO. THE BRAKE BOOSTER ON MY EDGE IS THE SAME ONE COVERED BY THE PROGRAM, AND IT'S NOW …

Read full complaint

THERE IS A FORD CUSTOMER SATISFACTION PROGRAM 13N02 2013-2013 FORD EDGE, BUT MY 2013 FORD EDGE IS NOT COVERED. NOW I AM HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THE BRAKE BOOSTER AND FORD WILL NOT HELP ME. I HAVE 125,000 MILES, SO SHOULD BE COVERED, BUT FORD SAYS NO. THE BRAKE BOOSTER ON MY EDGE IS THE SAME ONE COVERED BY THE PROGRAM, AND IT'S NOW BAD, AND NEEDS TO BE REPLACED. I HOPE YOU HELP WITH THIS PROBLEM. WHEN DRIVING IT HAS NO BRAKES, OR VERY LITTLE BRAKES.

NHTSA ODI #11217804

80,400 miles · Jun 4, 2019
Service Brakes

BRAKE BOOSTER FAILURE CAUSING DIFFICULTY BRINGING VEHICLE TO FULL STOP. VERY HARD PEDAL. I ALMOST WENT INTO CROSS TRAFFIC, WHICH WAS GOING AT 55MPH. I NEEDED TWO FEET TO BRING CAR TO FULL STOP.

NHTSA ODI #11217725

Official recalls

2

14V393000 · Power Train:axle Assembly:axle Shaft

Jul 2, 2014

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2014 Ford Edge and Lincoln MKX vehicles manufactured September 2, 2010, to November 30, 2013; 2013-2014 Ford Taurus and Lincoln MKS vehicles manufactured August 25, 2011, to November 30, 2013; and 2013-2014 Ford Flex and Lincoln MKT vehicles manufactured September 12, 2011, to November 30, 2013. In the affected vehicles, the halfshaft retention circlip may not have been properly installed, and as a result, the halfshaft may move outward and disengage from the linkshaft while driving and without prior warning.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the halfshaft and linkshaft become disengaged while driving, power will no longer be transmitted to the wheels, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash. Additionally, if the parking brake is not applied before exiting the vehicle, the vehicle may roll away despite the transmission being placed in 'Park', increasing the risk of injury to exiting occupants and bystanders.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the vehicles to make sure that the halfshaft is properly retained. If it is not, dealers will replace the linkshaft and also replace the halfshaft if it shows evidence of spline damage, free of charge. The recall began on August 4, 2014. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-800-392-3673. Ford's number for this recall is 14S10.

14V002000 · Fuel System, Gasoline

Jan 6, 2014

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2013 Edge vehicles manufactured from September 2, 2010, through April 25, 2013, and equipped with 2.0L engines. The fuel line pulse damper metal housing may crack as a result of an improper manufacturing process. A cracked fuel line pulse damper housing may result in a combination of fuel odor, weepage, or a continuous leak while the fuel system is pressurized.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the fuel line with one that does not have a damper, free of charge. The safety recall began on February 25, 2014. Owners may contact Ford at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 13S13. IMPORTANT: This recall supersedes recall 12V-438. All vehicles that have been remedied under the previous recall need to have the current remedy applied.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE16012 · Door Ajar Warning Light Always On

Opened Sep 28, 2016 · Closed Mar 20, 2017

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Interior Lighting; Latches/locks/linkages; Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Additional source detail variants (3)

Interior Lighting

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Latches/locks/linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.