← New search

2013 Ford Edge

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Edge years

Owner complaints for the 2013 Ford Edge are substantially higher than the model-year median of 724.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

1,793 reports with mileage · 651 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Electrical System. Review the 854 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 529 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Structure. Review the 300 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

33 crash reports7 fire reports24 injury reports

Service Brakes, Hydraulic complaints

105 reports
Clear category filter
122,000 miles · Oct 5, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact received notification of a Manufacturer's campaign program for the brake booster. The contact stated that while driving at approximately 30 MPH, the pre-collision warning light was illuminated and the brake pedal was depressed and extended to the floorboard. The contact stated that …

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact received notification of a Manufacturer's campaign program for the brake booster. The contact stated that while driving at approximately 30 MPH, the pre-collision warning light was illuminated and the brake pedal was depressed and extended to the floorboard. The contact stated that the failure reoccurred after the pre-collision warning light was illuminated; she depressed the brake pedal and the brake pedal went to the floorboard and was delayed in returning to the normal position. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 122,000.

NHTSA ODI #11488084

43,209 miles · Sep 30, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving 35 MPH and depressing the brake pedal, the vehicle failed to stop as needed. The contact stated that the check engine warning light was illuminated. The contact continued to depress the brake pedal forcefully until the vehicle stopped. The contact was able to co…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving 35 MPH and depressing the brake pedal, the vehicle failed to stop as needed. The contact stated that the check engine warning light was illuminated. The contact continued to depress the brake pedal forcefully until the vehicle stopped. The contact was able to continue driving to the closest independent mechanic. The contact took the vehicle to an independent mechanic and was informed that the manifold vacuum supply line, the booster assembly, and the intake manifold gaskets needed to be replaced. The vehicle was repaired. The contact called the local dealer and made them aware of the failure. The manufacturer had not been informed of the failure. The failure mileage was 43,209. The contact was informed that their vehicle was not covered by the recall even though their vehicle experienced the same issues and was also manufactured at the same plant that made the other affected vehicles.

NHTSA ODI #11487301

108,000 miles · Sep 27, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while depressing the brake pedal, the brake pedal felt spongy and the vehicle failed to perform as designed. The contact had to apply a lot of pressure to the brake pedal to stop the vehicle. No warning light was illuminated. The contact referenced the Manufacturer recal…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while depressing the brake pedal, the brake pedal felt spongy and the vehicle failed to perform as designed. The contact had to apply a lot of pressure to the brake pedal to stop the vehicle. No warning light was illuminated. The contact referenced the Manufacturer recall number 13N02. The contact stated that the vehicle was taken to Pep Boys where it was diagnosed that the brake booster and brake master cylinder needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The dealer was not notified of the failure. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and the contact was informed that the warranty would not be honored and advised the contact to call the NHTSA Hotline. The failure mileage was approximately 108,000.

NHTSA ODI #11486728

106,000 miles · Sep 26, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that the brake pedal was emitting a hissing sound while depressed. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact stated while driving 55 MPH, the brake pedal was depressed and made a hissing sound. The vehicle failed to respond and the brake pedal went to the floorboard…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that the brake pedal was emitting a hissing sound while depressed. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact stated while driving 55 MPH, the brake pedal was depressed and made a hissing sound. The vehicle failed to respond and the brake pedal went to the floorboard. The contact stated that he pumped the brake pedal until the vehicle responded. There was 50-100 feet stopping distance delay. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who test drove the vehicle and diagnosed that the brake booster had failed and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The dealer was notified of the failure and referred the contact to the manufacturer for assistance. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and informed the contact that they could not assist as the VIN was not included in an unknown recall. A case was opened. The manufacturer referred the contact to the NHTSA Hotline. The failure mileage was approximately 106,000.

NHTSA ODI #11486453

67,860 miles · Sep 26, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 201 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, she depressed the brake pedal and the brake pedal felt spongy. The contact then stated that she intermittently heard a hissing sound coming from the brake pedal. There was no warning light illuminated. The vehicle was taken to an ind…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 201 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, she depressed the brake pedal and the brake pedal felt spongy. The contact then stated that she intermittently heard a hissing sound coming from the brake pedal. There was no warning light illuminated. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where it was diagnosed that the brake booster failed and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The dealer was not notified of the failure. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and the contact was provided a case number and directed to call the NHTSA Hotline. The failure mileage was 67,860.

NHTSA ODI #11486361

80,000 miles · Sep 16, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while attempting to stop the vehicle, the brake pedal was hard to depress. Additionally, there was a hissing sound while depressing the brake pedal. The vehicle was taken to the local mechanic who diagnosed that the brake booster was faulty and needed to be replaced. The…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while attempting to stop the vehicle, the brake pedal was hard to depress. Additionally, there was a hissing sound while depressing the brake pedal. The vehicle was taken to the local mechanic who diagnosed that the brake booster was faulty and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not yet repaired. The manufacturer and local dealer were notified of the failure but no assistance was offered. The contact was informed of an Extended Warranty Coverage: (13N02). The failure mileage was 80,000.

NHTSA ODI #11484767

82,928 miles · Sep 9, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving approximately 35 MPH, the brake pedal was hard to operate and sluggish. There were no warning lights illuminated. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic. The vehicle was diagnosed with brake booster failure. The brake booster was replaced. The manufact…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving approximately 35 MPH, the brake pedal was hard to operate and sluggish. There were no warning lights illuminated. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic. The vehicle was diagnosed with brake booster failure. The brake booster was replaced. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The contact related the failure to Ford Technical Service Bulletin: 13N02. The approximate failure mileage was 82,928

NHTSA ODI #11483662

114,000 miles · Sep 9, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, the brake pedal was depressed and went to the floorboard, and failed to stop the vehicle immediately. The vehicle was towed to the dealer; however, the vehicle was not diagnosed nor repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the f…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, the brake pedal was depressed and went to the floorboard, and failed to stop the vehicle immediately. The vehicle was towed to the dealer; however, the vehicle was not diagnosed nor repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and advised the contact to file a complaint with the NHTSA Hotline. The contact related the failure to Customer Satisfaction Program: 13N02 (Extended Warranty Coverage on Brake Booster) however, the VIN was not included. The failure mileage was approximately 114,000.

NHTSA ODI #11483661

121,000 miles · Sep 6, 2022
Service BrakesService Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated there was a recall for brakes booster in 2019. The contact stated while driving approximately 35 MPH, the brake pedal was depressed; however, the contact felt as though the brakes were slipping. There were no warning lights illuminated. The contact related the failure to Ford…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated there was a recall for brakes booster in 2019. The contact stated while driving approximately 35 MPH, the brake pedal was depressed; however, the contact felt as though the brakes were slipping. There were no warning lights illuminated. The contact related the failure to Ford Customer Satisfaction Program: 13N02. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 121,000.

NHTSA ODI #11483046

89,250 miles · Aug 4, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving at various speeds and depressing the brake pedal, the brake pedal travelled to the floorboard, causing the stopping distance to be extended. The contact took the vehicle to the dealer who repaired the power brake booster. The manufacturer was made aware of the f…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving at various speeds and depressing the brake pedal, the brake pedal travelled to the floorboard, causing the stopping distance to be extended. The contact took the vehicle to the dealer who repaired the power brake booster. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and confirmed the repair was not covered under warranty or recall. The approximate failure mileage was 89,250.

NHTSA ODI #11477623

Official recalls

2

14V393000 · Power Train:axle Assembly:axle Shaft

Jul 2, 2014

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2014 Ford Edge and Lincoln MKX vehicles manufactured September 2, 2010, to November 30, 2013; 2013-2014 Ford Taurus and Lincoln MKS vehicles manufactured August 25, 2011, to November 30, 2013; and 2013-2014 Ford Flex and Lincoln MKT vehicles manufactured September 12, 2011, to November 30, 2013. In the affected vehicles, the halfshaft retention circlip may not have been properly installed, and as a result, the halfshaft may move outward and disengage from the linkshaft while driving and without prior warning.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the halfshaft and linkshaft become disengaged while driving, power will no longer be transmitted to the wheels, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash. Additionally, if the parking brake is not applied before exiting the vehicle, the vehicle may roll away despite the transmission being placed in 'Park', increasing the risk of injury to exiting occupants and bystanders.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the vehicles to make sure that the halfshaft is properly retained. If it is not, dealers will replace the linkshaft and also replace the halfshaft if it shows evidence of spline damage, free of charge. The recall began on August 4, 2014. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-800-392-3673. Ford's number for this recall is 14S10.

14V002000 · Fuel System, Gasoline

Jan 6, 2014

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2013 Edge vehicles manufactured from September 2, 2010, through April 25, 2013, and equipped with 2.0L engines. The fuel line pulse damper metal housing may crack as a result of an improper manufacturing process. A cracked fuel line pulse damper housing may result in a combination of fuel odor, weepage, or a continuous leak while the fuel system is pressurized.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the fuel line with one that does not have a damper, free of charge. The safety recall began on February 25, 2014. Owners may contact Ford at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 13S13. IMPORTANT: This recall supersedes recall 12V-438. All vehicles that have been remedied under the previous recall need to have the current remedy applied.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE16012 · Door Ajar Warning Light Always On

Opened Sep 28, 2016 · Closed Mar 20, 2017

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Interior Lighting; Latches/locks/linkages; Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Additional source detail variants (3)

Interior Lighting

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Latches/locks/linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.