← New search

2013 Ford Edge

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Edge years

Owner complaints for the 2013 Ford Edge are substantially higher than the model-year median of 724.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

1,793 reports with mileage · 651 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Electrical System. Review the 854 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 529 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Structure. Review the 300 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

33 crash reports7 fire reports24 injury reports

Service Brakes, Hydraulic complaints

105 reports
Clear category filter
257,000 miles · Apr 20, 2023
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving 45 MPH and depressing the brake pedal, the contact heard air coming from the brake pedal. The contact stated that the low brake air pressure warning light was illuminated. The contact stated that after pumping the brake pedal several timed the vehicle came to a …

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving 45 MPH and depressing the brake pedal, the contact heard air coming from the brake pedal. The contact stated that the low brake air pressure warning light was illuminated. The contact stated that after pumping the brake pedal several timed the vehicle came to a complete stop. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic and the mechanic stated that the brake booster needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The dealer was contacted but provide no assistance. The manufacturer was contacted, and the manufacturer stated that the vehicle was out of warranty. The contact was referred to the NHTSA Hotline for assistance. The failure mileage was 257,000.

NHTSA ODI #11518130

149,000 miles · Mar 16, 2023
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact’s husband owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while her son was driving 60 MPH, the brake pedal was depressed, but failed to respond and went down to the floorboard, almost causing a crash. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact ‘s son engaged the electronic parking brake and began to veer to the s…

Read full complaint

The contact’s husband owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while her son was driving 60 MPH, the brake pedal was depressed, but failed to respond and went down to the floorboard, almost causing a crash. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact ‘s son engaged the electronic parking brake and began to veer to the side of the road; however, the vehicle spun and stopped on the side of the road. The vehicle was towed to the residence. The vehicle was then towed to several independent mechanics, where the vehicle was diagnosed that the brake booster had failed and needed to be replaced. The dealer was notified of the failure and informed the contact that the vehicle could not be repaired under Ford Campaign Number: 13N02 because the vehicle was 4,000 miles over the Extended Warranty coverage mileage. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 149,000.

NHTSA ODI #11512255

105,607 miles · Feb 8, 2023
EngineService Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact called on behalf of a customer who owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who noticed that there was an abnormal hissing noise detected when the brake pedal was depressed. While driving, the vehicle was hesitating. The check engine warning light was illuminated…

Read full complaint

The contact called on behalf of a customer who owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who noticed that there was an abnormal hissing noise detected when the brake pedal was depressed. While driving, the vehicle was hesitating. The check engine warning light was illuminated. The mechanic informed the consumer that the brake booster needed to be replaced. The local dealer was contacted but the vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was contacted and referred the contact to the NHTSA Hotline. The failure mileage was approximately 105,607.

NHTSA ODI #11506204

120,500 miles · Jan 11, 2023
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving approximately 40 MPH and slowing for a traffic signal, she heard a hissing sound coming under the driver's side floorboard nearby the steering column. The contact stated that she continued to depress the brake pedal to stop the vehicle; however, the brake pedal …

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while driving approximately 40 MPH and slowing for a traffic signal, she heard a hissing sound coming under the driver's side floorboard nearby the steering column. The contact stated that she continued to depress the brake pedal to stop the vehicle; however, the brake pedal went down to the floorboard with an abnormal squealing sound. Additionally, the contact stated that the engine stalled. The contact stated that the low oil pressure warning light was illuminated. The contact had not taken the vehicle to a local dealer or independent mechanic to be diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer had been informed of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 120,500.

NHTSA ODI #11501353

94,000 miles · Jan 4, 2023
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while operating the vehicle, the braking system malfunctioned causing the brake pedal to become soft, hard, or extend to the floorboard while depressed, causing the braking distance to become extended. The vehicle was taken to the local mechanic who diagnosed that the br…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while operating the vehicle, the braking system malfunctioned causing the brake pedal to become soft, hard, or extend to the floorboard while depressed, causing the braking distance to become extended. The vehicle was taken to the local mechanic who diagnosed that the brake booster was faulty and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not yet repaired. The local dealer was notified of the failure, but no assistance was offered. The contact was informed that the Extended Warranty coverage related to the failure had expired. The failure mileage was 94,000.

NHTSA ODI #11500172

130,000 miles · Nov 21, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while driving at an unknown speed, the brakes became inoperable. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact stated while driving and attempting to slow down to stop, the brake pedal became soft, and depressed to the floorboard. The vehicle was taken to an indepe…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while driving at an unknown speed, the brakes became inoperable. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact stated while driving and attempting to slow down to stop, the brake pedal became soft, and depressed to the floorboard. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who bled the brake lines however, the failure recurred. The brake lines were bled again however, the mechanic was unable to determine the cause of the failure. The contact called the local dealer, but the vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was contacted but no additional assistance was provided. The approximate failure mileage was 130,000. The VIN was not available.

NHTSA ODI #11494413

116,000 miles · Nov 15, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, the brake pedal depressed the floorboard intermittently. There were no warning lights illuminated. The vehicle was taken to the local dealer; however, the mechanic was unable to duplicate the failure. The failure continued and the v…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, the brake pedal depressed the floorboard intermittently. There were no warning lights illuminated. The vehicle was taken to the local dealer; however, the mechanic was unable to duplicate the failure. The failure continued and the vehicle was taken back to the local dealer where it was diagnosed that the rear differential, the brake booster, and the brake master cylinder needed to be replaced. The vehicle was repaired; however, the failure persisted. The manufacturer was not contacted. The failure mileage was approximately 116,000.

NHTSA ODI #11493703

151,000 miles · Nov 8, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while depressing the brake pedal, there was an abnormal hissing sound. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact also stated that the brake pedal was firm upon depression. The dealer was notified of the failure and informed him that the warranty related to the …

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while depressing the brake pedal, there was an abnormal hissing sound. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact also stated that the brake pedal was firm upon depression. The dealer was notified of the failure and informed him that the warranty related to the failure had expired; the contact was then referred to the manufacturer for assistance. The manufacturer provided the same information as the dealer and referred him to the NHTSA Hotline for assistance. The vehicle had yet to be repaired. The failure mileage was 151,000.

NHTSA ODI #11492735

74,000 miles · Nov 2, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact's daughter owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while her daughter was driving 35 MPH, the brake pedal was depressed and hesitated to respond, causing a 10-foot stopping distance delay. The contact stated that the failure had been reoccurring while depressing the brake pedal. The vehicle was taken to an independ…

Read full complaint

The contact's daughter owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while her daughter was driving 35 MPH, the brake pedal was depressed and hesitated to respond, causing a 10-foot stopping distance delay. The contact stated that the failure had been reoccurring while depressing the brake pedal. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where it was diagnosed that the brake booster needed to be replaced. The dealer and the manufacturer were notified of the failure and informed the contact that the vehicle could not be repaired under Ford Customer Satisfaction Program Campaign Number: 13N02 as it had expired. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 74,000.

NHTSA ODI #11491991

144,000 miles · Oct 11, 2022
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while her son was driving at an undisclosed speed, the brake pedal was depressed but felt rigid. The contact's son then applied more pressure to the brake pedal until it responded. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact stated that the failure had been reoccurrin…

Read full complaint

The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated while her son was driving at an undisclosed speed, the brake pedal was depressed but felt rigid. The contact's son then applied more pressure to the brake pedal until it responded. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact stated that the failure had been reoccurring. The power train warning light was illuminated. The vehicle was taken to local Pep Boys where it was diagnosed that the brake booster had failed and needed to be replaced. The dealer and the manufacturer were not notified of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 144,000.

NHTSA ODI #11488859

Official recalls

2

14V393000 · Power Train:axle Assembly:axle Shaft

Jul 2, 2014

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2014 Ford Edge and Lincoln MKX vehicles manufactured September 2, 2010, to November 30, 2013; 2013-2014 Ford Taurus and Lincoln MKS vehicles manufactured August 25, 2011, to November 30, 2013; and 2013-2014 Ford Flex and Lincoln MKT vehicles manufactured September 12, 2011, to November 30, 2013. In the affected vehicles, the halfshaft retention circlip may not have been properly installed, and as a result, the halfshaft may move outward and disengage from the linkshaft while driving and without prior warning.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the halfshaft and linkshaft become disengaged while driving, power will no longer be transmitted to the wheels, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash. Additionally, if the parking brake is not applied before exiting the vehicle, the vehicle may roll away despite the transmission being placed in 'Park', increasing the risk of injury to exiting occupants and bystanders.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the vehicles to make sure that the halfshaft is properly retained. If it is not, dealers will replace the linkshaft and also replace the halfshaft if it shows evidence of spline damage, free of charge. The recall began on August 4, 2014. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-800-392-3673. Ford's number for this recall is 14S10.

14V002000 · Fuel System, Gasoline

Jan 6, 2014

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2013 Edge vehicles manufactured from September 2, 2010, through April 25, 2013, and equipped with 2.0L engines. The fuel line pulse damper metal housing may crack as a result of an improper manufacturing process. A cracked fuel line pulse damper housing may result in a combination of fuel odor, weepage, or a continuous leak while the fuel system is pressurized.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the fuel line with one that does not have a damper, free of charge. The safety recall began on February 25, 2014. Owners may contact Ford at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 13S13. IMPORTANT: This recall supersedes recall 12V-438. All vehicles that have been remedied under the previous recall need to have the current remedy applied.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE16012 · Door Ajar Warning Light Always On

Opened Sep 28, 2016 · Closed Mar 20, 2017

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Interior Lighting; Latches/locks/linkages; Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Additional source detail variants (3)

Interior Lighting

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Latches/locks/linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.