ON OR ABOUT APRIL 5, 2007, I BROUGHT MY 2001 DODGE CARAVAN TO A LOCAL DODGE DEALER FOR THE REPAIR OF THE SPEEDOMETER ON MY CAR WHICH STOPPED FUNCTIONING & STOPPED MEASURING THE SPEED OF MY VEHICLE. THE DEALER KEPT THE CAR FOR ONE DAY AND CLAIMED THAT THEY RECALIBRATED THE SPEEDOMETER AND "ALL IS WELL." APPROXIMATELY THREE MONTHS…
Read full complaint
ON OR ABOUT APRIL 5, 2007, I BROUGHT MY 2001 DODGE CARAVAN TO A LOCAL DODGE DEALER FOR THE REPAIR OF THE SPEEDOMETER ON MY CAR WHICH STOPPED FUNCTIONING & STOPPED MEASURING THE SPEED OF MY VEHICLE. THE DEALER KEPT THE CAR FOR ONE DAY AND CLAIMED THAT THEY RECALIBRATED THE SPEEDOMETER AND "ALL IS WELL." APPROXIMATELY THREE MONTHS LATER, THE SPEEDOMETER CEASED WORKING AGAIN. SO, ON OR ABOUT JULY 19,2007, I CALLED MERRICK DODGE & REQUESTED AN IMMEDIATE APPOINTMENT BECAUSE OF THE SAFETY HAZARD OF DRIVING A VEHICLE WITHOUT A WORKING SPEEDOMETER. ON JULY 23, 2007, I CALLED AND REQUESTED AN IMMEDIATE APPOINTMENT BUT WAS ADVISED THAT I COULD NOT RECEIVE AN APPOINTMENT UNTIL 8/8. I TOLD THE REPRESENTATIVE THAT WAS UNACCEPTABLE IN VIEW OF THE POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS CONDITION AS WELL AS VIOLATION OF NY STATE VEHICLE & TRAFFIC LAW SEC. 375 IF I DROVE A VEHICLE WITHOUT A WORKING SPEEDOMETER. THEREAFTER, I WAS GIVEN AN APPOINTMENT ON 7/26/07. ON 7/26, I ARRIVED AT THE NEW ADDRESS OF THE DEALER AT OR ABOUT 8 AM AND WAS ASSURED THAT THE VEHICLE WOULD BE REPAIRED THE SAME DAY. I DID NOT RECEIVE A PHONE CALL BY 1 PM SO I CALLED THE DEALER AND WAS ADVISED THAT THEY HAD NOT REACHED THE CAR AS OF THAT TIME. THEREAFTER, I CALLED THE DEALER AT ABOUT 4:45 TO INQUIRE AS TO THE STATUS OF MY CAR AND WAS ADVISED THAT A RECALIBRATING OF THE SPEEDOMETER FAILED SO A NEW "CLUSTER FOR THE SPEEDOMETER" WOULD HAVE TO BE ORDERED. I WAS ALSO ADVISED THAT UNDER MY 7 YEAR 60K MILE SERVICE CONTRACT, I WOULD HAVE TO PAY A $100 DEDUCTIBLE EVENTHOUGH THIS WAS A RECURRING CONDITION THAT WAS ADDRESSED A MERE THREE MONTHS AGO. THE CAR HAS APPROXIMATELY 42,000 MILES ON IT. I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT I SHOULD HAVE TO PAY THE DEDUCTIBLE WHEN THERE CLEARLY IS A MANUFACTURING DEFECT. I ADVISED CHRYSLER THAT I WOULD NOT PAY THE DEDUCTIBLE FOR A RECURRING CONDITION THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED A "LEMON" UNDER NEW YORK STATE'S LEMON LAW. I WOULD APPRECIATE WHATEVER ASSISTANCE YOUR AGENCY CAN GIVE ME WITH THIS PROBLEM. THANK YOU. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10197620
Mileage unknown · May 4, 2006
Electrical System
WHENEVER THE DRIVING OR HEADLIGHTS ARE ON THE SWITCH GETS WARM TO THE TOUCH. *NM
NHTSA ODI #10156794
4,827 miles · Jun 9, 2004
Electrical SystemFire
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS 2001 DODGE B VAN WITH 4827 MILES. THE VAN WAS PARKED IN A CUSTOMER'S DRIVEWAY WHILE THE DRIVER PERFORMED PHONE REPAIRS INSIDE THEIR HOUSE. THE CUSTOMER NOTICED THE VAN BURNING. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT EXTINGUISHED THE FIRE. AN INVESTIGATION BY TROOPER INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES CONCLUDED THAT THE FIRE WAS ELECTRIC…
Read full complaint
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS 2001 DODGE B VAN WITH 4827 MILES. THE VAN WAS PARKED IN A CUSTOMER'S DRIVEWAY WHILE THE DRIVER PERFORMED PHONE REPAIRS INSIDE THEIR HOUSE. THE CUSTOMER NOTICED THE VAN BURNING. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT EXTINGUISHED THE FIRE. AN INVESTIGATION BY TROOPER INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES CONCLUDED THAT THE FIRE WAS ELECTRICAL IN NATURE AND STARTED IN THE HEATER BOX AREA OF THE VAN. RESULTS OF A FIRE INVESTIGATION BY DODGE HAVE NEVER BEEN RELEASED TO VERIZON. VERIZON HAS EXPERIENCED MANY BLOWER MOTOR FAILURES AND BLOWER RESISTOR FAILURES IN THIS MODEL VEHICLE. VERIZON HAS EXPERIENCED SIMILAR FIRES IN THIS MODEL VEHICLE AND FEELS THAT THESE FIRES WARRANT FURTHER INVESTIGATION. *AK
NHTSA ODI #10075094
Official recalls
0
No recalls in this snapshot.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
0
No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.
2001 Dodge Van Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year