← New search

2012 Chrysler Town And Country

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Town And Country years

Owner complaints for the 2012 Chrysler Town And Country are substantially higher than the model-year median of 216.5.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

372 reports with mileage · 262 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Electrical System. Review the 395 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Engine. Review the 100 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Fuel/propulsion System. Review the 56 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

7 crash reports16 fire reports19 injury reports

Unknown Or Other complaints

58 reports
Clear category filter
58,000 miles · Dec 13, 2016
Electrical SystemUnknown Or Other

WE RECENTLY PURCHASED OUR SECOND TOWN AND COUNTRY AFTER HAVING REALLY LIKING OUR FIRST VAN. WE REALLY LIKED THE IDEA OF HAVING THE BLIND SPOT DETECTION SYSTEM. A YEAR OR SO INTO OWNING THE VAN WE STARTED GETTING A WARNING ABOUT THE BLIND SPOT SYSTEM NOT BEING AVAILABLE AND SAID THAT IT NEEDED SERVICE. IT STARTED HAPPENING WHEN T…

Read full complaint

WE RECENTLY PURCHASED OUR SECOND TOWN AND COUNTRY AFTER HAVING REALLY LIKING OUR FIRST VAN. WE REALLY LIKED THE IDEA OF HAVING THE BLIND SPOT DETECTION SYSTEM. A YEAR OR SO INTO OWNING THE VAN WE STARTED GETTING A WARNING ABOUT THE BLIND SPOT SYSTEM NOT BEING AVAILABLE AND SAID THAT IT NEEDED SERVICE. IT STARTED HAPPENING WHEN THE SNOW STARTED FLYING HERE IN MICHIGAN. NOW AS SOON AS YOU START THE VEHICLE IT STATES IT IS NOT AVAILABLE AND LEAVES THE TRIANGLES LIT IN THE MIRRORS WITH AN OCCASIONAL BEEPING SOUND. FROM OTHER POSTS AND RESEARCH I HAVE READ THIS SEEMS TO BE A COMMON ISSUE WITH WATER GETTING INTO THESE SENSORS AND SHORTING THEM OUT. WHY THESE SENSORS WEREN'T MADE MORE WEATHER PROOF IS BEYOND ME. SINCE THIS IS AN ADD ON TO MAKE DRIVING SAFER I THINK CHRYSLER SHOULD STEP UP, BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE AND RECALL THESE VERY EXPENSIVE SAFETY MODULES. TO HAVE JUST ONE OF THE TWO SENSORS REPLACED BY A DEALER IS $1200. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10935014

41,000 miles · Sep 16, 2016
Electrical SystemExterior LightingUnknown Or Other

THIS IS MY 7TH CHRYSLER OR DODGE MINIVAN - AND I LOVE THEM. I SEARCHED FOR 6 MONTHS TO FIND THE MODEL/COLOR/FEATURES I WANTED BEFORE FINDING THIS PARTICULAR VEHICLE. I WAS THRILLED THAT IT HAD ALL THE OPTIONS I WANTED - HIGHEST ON MY LIST IS THE 'BLIND SPOT SENSORS' AS I DO A LOT OF HIGHWAY DRIVING WITH KIDS IN THE CAR ON BUSY M…

Read full complaint

THIS IS MY 7TH CHRYSLER OR DODGE MINIVAN - AND I LOVE THEM. I SEARCHED FOR 6 MONTHS TO FIND THE MODEL/COLOR/FEATURES I WANTED BEFORE FINDING THIS PARTICULAR VEHICLE. I WAS THRILLED THAT IT HAD ALL THE OPTIONS I WANTED - HIGHEST ON MY LIST IS THE 'BLIND SPOT SENSORS' AS I DO A LOT OF HIGHWAY DRIVING WITH KIDS IN THE CAR ON BUSY MICHIGAN HIGHWAYS. A FEW WEEKS AGO THE SENSORS WOULD 'STICK' ON, BUT AFTER RESTARTING THE VAN IT THEY WOULD WORK PROPERLY FOR A WHILE, AND THEN 'STICK' ON AGAIN. NOW THEY ARE ALWAYS ON - MAKING AN EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE SAFETY FEATURE OPTION USELESS AS I HAVE HAD TO TURN THEM OFF TO STOP THE CONSTANT CHIMING AND FOR THE SENSOR LIGHTS IN MY SIDE-VIEW MIRRORS TO BE OFF. I HAVE LOOKED ALL OVER THE INTERNET AND APPARENTLY THIS IS AN EXTREMELY COMMON ISSUE. WHERE CAN I GET SERIOUS SAFETY THIS ISSUE FIXED? AS IT IS APPARENTLY SOME DESIGN FLAW I DO NOT BELIEVE *I* SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING FOR THESE REPAIRS AND IF IT CANNOT BE FIXED I SHOULD BE REIMBURSED THE STICKER COST OF THIS FEATURE AS IT CANNOT BE USED!

NHTSA ODI #10907193

30,000 miles · May 23, 2016
Unknown Or Other

CAR WAS PARKED. I HAD PREVIOUSLY USED IT THAT DAY. IT WOULD NOT START. PROBLEM IS INTERMITTENT. ON ONE OCCASION WHEN IT FINALLY STARTED IT DISPLAYED OBJECT IN THE REAR OF THE CAR MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH THERE WAS NO OBJECT.

NHTSA ODI #10870333

38,000 miles · Apr 13, 2016
Unknown Or Other

WE HAVE THE BLIND SPOT MONITORING SYSTEM ON THIS VAN - A SEVERAL THOUSAND DOLLAR OPTION. BOTH REAR SENSORS HAVE RUSTED/CORRODED OUT TWO YEARS AGO DUE TO A SUP-PAR DESIGN. THEY COST ABOUT FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS TO REPLACE. WHY DON' T CHRYSLER HAVE TO RECALL AND REPLACE THE DEFECTIVE SENSORS?

NHTSA ODI #10855260

80,000 miles · Mar 23, 2016
Unknown Or Other

AIR CONDITIONING WENT OUT ON THE CAR COSTING 1300 TO FIX. CAR IS ONLY 4 YEARS OLD.

NHTSA ODI #10851183

61,109 miles · Feb 11, 2016
Unknown Or Other

THE BLIND SPOT MONITOR SYSTEM HAS FAILED AT 61109 MILES. THE SENSORS NEED TO BE REPLACED AND THE VEHICLE IS OUT OF WARRANTY. THE COST IS $2200 AND HAS TO BE REPAIRED BY THE DEALER. I WILL HAVE TO TURN OFF THE SYSTEM AND DRIVE WITHOUT IT. AS A SAFETY SYSTEM OF THE VEHICLE, THE SYSTEM SHOULD BE UNDER WARRANTY FOR THE SAME TIME P…

Read full complaint

THE BLIND SPOT MONITOR SYSTEM HAS FAILED AT 61109 MILES. THE SENSORS NEED TO BE REPLACED AND THE VEHICLE IS OUT OF WARRANTY. THE COST IS $2200 AND HAS TO BE REPAIRED BY THE DEALER. I WILL HAVE TO TURN OFF THE SYSTEM AND DRIVE WITHOUT IT. AS A SAFETY SYSTEM OF THE VEHICLE, THE SYSTEM SHOULD BE UNDER WARRANTY FOR THE SAME TIME PERIOD AS THE EMISSIONS SYSTEM.

NHTSA ODI #10825532

62,125 miles · Jan 19, 2016
Unknown Or Other

JUST TODAY MY BLIND SPOT MONITORING SYSTEM SEEMS TO HAVE MALFUNCTIONED. THE VEHICLE HAS JUST OVER 62,000 MILES ON IT AND IS WELL MAINTAINED AND TAKEN CARE OF. THE SYSTEM FUNCTIONED PROPERLY YESTERDAY AND THEN WHEN MY WIFE DROVE IT TODAY SHE STARTED TO EXPERIENCE THE ISSUE. I HAD TO SHUT OFF THE MONITORING SYSTEM AS THE BLIND SPO…

Read full complaint

JUST TODAY MY BLIND SPOT MONITORING SYSTEM SEEMS TO HAVE MALFUNCTIONED. THE VEHICLE HAS JUST OVER 62,000 MILES ON IT AND IS WELL MAINTAINED AND TAKEN CARE OF. THE SYSTEM FUNCTIONED PROPERLY YESTERDAY AND THEN WHEN MY WIFE DROVE IT TODAY SHE STARTED TO EXPERIENCE THE ISSUE. I HAD TO SHUT OFF THE MONITORING SYSTEM AS THE BLIND SPOT INDICATORS REMAINED LIT SIMULTANEOUSLY AND THE VEHICLE INFORMATION CENTER CONTINUED TO CHIME WITH THE INDICATION TO "SERVICE BLIND SPOT SYSTEM." A SIMPLE ONLINE SEARCH OF "SERVICE BLIND SPOT SYSTEM" BRINGS UP MULTIPLE COMPLAINTS OF THE EXACT SAME THING HAVING HAPPENED TO OWNERS OF THIS VERY SAME YEAR, MAKE, AND MODEL OF THIS VEHICLE. ALL OF THESE COMPLAINTS, ON AVERAGE, HAD ROUGHLY THE SAME AMOUNT OF MILES AS MY VEHICLE DOES. ALL OF THE COMPLAINTS ALSO LIST A REPAIR COST OF $1,000 TO $2,000+ AND REMARK THAT IT MAY BE BOTH SENSORS THAT NEED TO BE REPLACED AND NOT JUST ONE OF THEM. IF THIS IS TRUE AND IT SEEMS TO BE A RECURRING THEME, WHY IS THERE NOT A RECALL FOR THIS ISSUE? BOTH SENSORS SHOULD BE REPLACED BY CHRYSLER AT NO COST TO THE MANUFACTURER AS IT SEEMS TO BE A RELATIVELY KNOWN ISSUE.

NHTSA ODI #10821141

41,000 miles · Jan 5, 2016
Electrical SystemFuel/propulsion SystemUnknown Or Other

ON 12/12/2015 BOUGHT A USED 2012 TOWN AND COUNTRY TOURING L WITH PUSH-TO-START FEATURE, WITH 40,500 MILES. STARTING 12/20/2015 I WOULD GET IN THE CAR, STEP ON BRAKE, PUSH THE START BUTTON, THE ENGINE STARTS UP, AND VROOM FOR A COUPLE SECONDS, THEN DIED. IF I PUSH THE START BUTTON AGAIN IT WOULD TRY CRANK ALL DAY BUT WOULD NOT ST…

Read full complaint

ON 12/12/2015 BOUGHT A USED 2012 TOWN AND COUNTRY TOURING L WITH PUSH-TO-START FEATURE, WITH 40,500 MILES. STARTING 12/20/2015 I WOULD GET IN THE CAR, STEP ON BRAKE, PUSH THE START BUTTON, THE ENGINE STARTS UP, AND VROOM FOR A COUPLE SECONDS, THEN DIED. IF I PUSH THE START BUTTON AGAIN IT WOULD TRY CRANK ALL DAY BUT WOULD NOT START. I'D HAVE TO FOOT-OFF THE BRAKE AND PUSH START TO HAVE IT IN THE OFF MODE, OPEN AND CLOSE THE DOOR TO "RESET" EVERYTHING AS I JUST GET IN THE CAR, AND RE-TRY AGAIN, AND IT WOULD START UP NORMALLY. IT WAS A ONCE A WEEK THING, AND NOW ONCE EVERY COUPLE DAYS. I FOUND A LARGE AMOUNT OF SIMILAR COMPLAINTS ONLINE AND ALL POINTS TO THE TIPM DEFECT. I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THE ISSUE, IN ADDITION TO START UP, MIGHT HAPPEN DURING DRIVING. MY CAR IS UNDER EXTENDED WARRANTY AND I'LL HAVE IT FIXED SOON, BUT I'M CONCERNED ABOUT IF THE REPLACEMENT WOULD BE THE SAME PARTS THAT WOULD GO BAD AGAIN IN THREE YEARS. CHRYSLERSHOULD ISSUE A RECALL WITH A NEW-AND-IMPROVED TIPM MODULE.

NHTSA ODI #10818109

41,170 miles · Oct 4, 2015
StructureUnknown Or OtherVisibility/wiper

MYSELF, THE DRIVER AND MY WIFE WERE (RIDING IN THE PASSENGER SEAT), WITH MY SON 2 YEAR OLD SITTING IN HIS CAR SEAT IN THE MIDDLE ROW. THE CURRENT OUTSIDE TEMPERATURE OUTSIDE WAS 70 DEGREES F . WE HAD JUST DROVE THROUGH A SMALL RESIDENTIAL AREA GOING APPROX. 30 MPH. WE CAME TO A STOP LIGHT , WHILE WAITING FOR THE LIGHT TO CHANGE …

Read full complaint

MYSELF, THE DRIVER AND MY WIFE WERE (RIDING IN THE PASSENGER SEAT), WITH MY SON 2 YEAR OLD SITTING IN HIS CAR SEAT IN THE MIDDLE ROW. THE CURRENT OUTSIDE TEMPERATURE OUTSIDE WAS 70 DEGREES F . WE HAD JUST DROVE THROUGH A SMALL RESIDENTIAL AREA GOING APPROX. 30 MPH. WE CAME TO A STOP LIGHT , WHILE WAITING FOR THE LIGHT TO CHANGE THERE WAS A LOUD POP , ALMOST SOUNDED LIKE A FIRE CRACKER GOING OFF. WE INSTANTLY TURNED AROUND TO FIND THE REAR GATE WINDOW SHATTER. AT FIRST I THOUGHT THE VEHICLE SITTING BEHIND ME AT THE LIGHT HAD HIT MY VEHICLE, BUT WHEN I LOOKED HE WAS PARKED NEARLY 8 FEET AWAY. I TALK TO THE GUY AND HIS WIFE SITTING BEHIND ME AND HE SAID , THAT IT WAS WEIRD IT LOOK AS IF THE WINDOW BLEW OUT FROM THE INSIDE. THE WINDOW JUST EXPLODE. HERE WERE THE CURRENT VARIABLES TAKING PLACE IN THE CAR WHILE AT STOP. 1. THE REAR DEFROST WAS NOT ON 2.THE REAR SIDE VENT WINDOWS WERE BOTH FULLY OPEN 3. OUTSIDE TEMPERATURE WAS A COMFORTABLE 70 DEGREES F. NOW AS FOR THE AFTER MATH THERE'S NOT REALLY MUCH TO TELL OTHER THAN THE WINDOW SHATTERED(COMPLETELY GONE) AND GLASS ALL OVER THE PLACE INCLUDING RIGHT NEXT TO MY SONS CAR SEAT. THE FOCAL POINT OF THE BREAK SEEMED TO BE LOCATED AT NEAR DEAD CENTER. I'VE JUST CONTACTED CHRYSLER ABOUT THIS AND I AM GOING TOMORROW TO SEE WHAT THEY SAY. WHEN I GOOGLED THIS PROBLEM I FOUND A HANDFUL OF TOWN AND COUNTRY FROM 01 TO 13 WITH THIS PROBLEM. BUT THEY TELL ME ON THE PHONE THIS IS NOT A COMMON THING AND WILL NEED FCA DEALER TO LOOK AT IT , WHICH IS FINE MY ONLY CONCERN IS THEY FIX THE ISSUE, BECAUSE I CAN REPLACE A WINDOW BUT THIS DOES NOT SOLVE THE UNDERLING PROBLEM. HAD THERE BEEN PEOPLE IN THE 3RD ROW SEATING WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPEN TO THEM? THIS VEHICLE (MINIVAN) WAS PURCHASED TO BE USED AS OUR FAMILY VEHICLE AND NOW SADLY I AM WORRIED TO DRIVE WITH MY TWO YEAR OLD SON IN IT. HOPEFULLY A RESOLUTION CAN BE MADE

NHTSA ODI #10779600

29,083 miles · Sep 17, 2015
Unknown Or Other

WE NOTICED THE AIR CONDITIONING WAS MAKING A HISSING NOISE. NO COOL AIR BLOWING OUT. WAS TOLD IT WAS OUR REAR EVAPORATOR. THE VAN ONLY HAS 29,083 MILES ON IT. BUT THE WARRANTY IS UP BECAUSE IT IS 3 YR. OLD IN JULY 2015. HAD A 2006 CHRYSLER MINIVAN AND HAD SAME THING HAPPEN BUT THEY HAD EXTENDED THE WARRANT TO 7 YR OR 70,000 MIL…

Read full complaint

WE NOTICED THE AIR CONDITIONING WAS MAKING A HISSING NOISE. NO COOL AIR BLOWING OUT. WAS TOLD IT WAS OUR REAR EVAPORATOR. THE VAN ONLY HAS 29,083 MILES ON IT. BUT THE WARRANTY IS UP BECAUSE IT IS 3 YR. OLD IN JULY 2015. HAD A 2006 CHRYSLER MINIVAN AND HAD SAME THING HAPPEN BUT THEY HAD EXTENDED THE WARRANT TO 7 YR OR 70,000 MILES, SO WE DIDN'T HAVE TO PAY. THIS REPAIR ON A 2012 CHRYSLER TOWN AND COUNTRY IS GOING TO BE $1100.00. VERY UNFAIR OF CHRYSLER NOT TO FIX THIS PROBLEM UNDER WARRANTY. VERY UNHAPPY WITH CHRYSLER.

NHTSA ODI #10764741

Official recalls

5

25V876000 · Equipment Adaptive/mobility:wheelchair Restraints/securement:latch/anchor:

Dec 17, 2025

Rollx Vans (Rollx) is recalling certain GMC Yukon, Sierra, Chevrolet Express 2500, Ford Transit, E-250, Toyota Sienna, Sienna Hybrid, Honda Odyssey, Chrysler Town and Country, Voyager, Pacifica, Dodge Grand Caravan, and Ram Promaster vehicles equipped with QRT-Deluxe and QRT-Max wheelchair restraints. Please refer to Rollx's recall report for specific model year information. The retractors may not lock, preventing the wheelchair from being properly secured.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An unsecured wheelchair can move during transit, increasing the risk of injury.

Remedy: Rollx will work with Q'Straint to inspect and replace the retractors as necessary, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed February 5, 2026. Owners may contact Rollx's customer service at 1-800-956-6668.

14V234000 · Electrical System

May 7, 2014

Chrysler Group, LLC (Chrysler) is recalling certain model year 2010-2014 Chrysler Town and Country and Dodge Grand Caravan vehicles manufactured August 25, 2010, through October 31, 2013. The affected vehicles may experience overheating of the vent window switch in the driver's door armrest.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An overheated switch may result in a vehicle fire.

Remedy: Chrysler will notify owners, and dealers will replace the vent window switch with a newer version, free of charge. The owner notification letter was issued and the remedy campaign launched on on December 31, 2014. Owners may contact Chrysler customer service at 1-800-853-1403. Chrysler's number for this recall is P25.

12V191000 · Equipment

May 2, 2012

CHRYSLER IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2012 TOWN AND COUNTRY AND DODGE GRAND CARAVAN VEHICLES, MANUFACTURED FROM MARCH 9, 2012 THROUGH MARCH 12, 2012. SOME VEHICLES MAY BE EQUIPPED WITH A RIGHT SIDE LIFTGATE PINCH SENSOR THAT DOES NOT FUNCTION PROPERLY. AS A RESULT, INCREASED FORCE MAY BE REQUIRED IN ORDER TO STOP THE POWER LIFTGATE DURING FINAL CLOSING STAGES.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: THE POWER LIFTGATE DOOR MAY CLOSE ON AN APPENDAGE, INCREASING THE RISK OF INJURY.

Remedy: CHRYSLER WILL NOTIFY OWNERS, AND DEALERS WILL INSPECT AND REPLACE THE RIGHT SIDE LIFTGATE PINCH SENSORS, FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 18, 2012. OWNERS MAY CONTACT CHRYSLER AT 1-800-853-1403.

12V141000 · Suspension:rear

Apr 3, 2012

CHRYSLER IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2012 TOWN AND COUNTRY AND DODGE GRAND CARAVAN VEHICLES MANUFACTURED FROM NOVEMBER 15, 2011, THROUGH NOVEMBER 21, 2011. SOME VEHICLES MAY BE EQUIPPED WITH RIGHT REAR HUB AND BEARING ASSEMBLIES THAT WERE NOT FULLY MACHINED.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: THIS COULD RESULT IN A DECREASE IN DURABILITY, WHICH MAY LEAD TO WHEEL SEPARATION, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: CHRYSLER WILL NOTIFY OWNERS, AND DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE RIGHT REAR HUB AND BEARING ASSEMBLY, FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON APRIL 27, 2012. OWNERS MAY CONTACT CHRYSLER AT 1-800-853-1403.

11V487000 · Engine And Engine Cooling

Sep 29, 2011

CHRYSLER IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2012 CHRYSLER VEHICLES, INCLUDING 200 AND TOWN AND COUNTRY MODELS, DODGE VEHICLES, INCLUDING CHARGER, DURANGO, GRAND CARAVAN AND JOURNEY MODELS AND JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE VEHICLES MANUFACTURED FROM AUGUST 31, 2011, THROUGH SEPTEMBER 13, 2011, THAT ARE EQUIPPED WITH 3.6L ENGINES. THESE ENGINES MAY EXPERIENCE CONNECTING ROD BEARING FAILURE DUE TO DEBRIS INSIDE THE ENGINE BLOCK.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: CONNECTING ROD FAILURE MAY LEAD TO ENGINE SEIZURE WHICH MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: CHRYSLER WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE ENGINE FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 18, 2011. OWNERS MAY CONTACT CHRYSLER AT 1-800-853-1403.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

2

PE19014 · Active Head Rest Inadvertent Deployment

Opened Sep 9, 2019 · Closed Feb 25, 2026

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Seats; Seats:front Assembly:head Restraint

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened PE19014 on September 9, 2019, to investigate 128 consumer complaints alleging that the Active Head Rest (AHR) inadvertently deployed without the occurrence of a crash or other rear impact event in model year (MY) 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles.When ODI opened the investigation, ODI was aware of thirteen alleged injuries.A small number of Early Warning Reports identified driver and/or passenger front seat AHR inadvertent deployments without a rear impact event.Reported safety consequences resulting from the AHR deployments include concussions, headaches, soft tissue injuries, disorientation, nausea, vomiting and/or loss of vehicle control as a result of being surprised and distracted by being struck in the head by the inadvertent AHR deployment. On September 24, 2019, ODI sent an Information Request (IR) letter to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA).ODI requested certain detailed information from FCA related to the following subject vehicles: MY 2010-2014 Dodge Avenger 200, MY 2010-2014 Dodge Calber, MY 2010-2014 Chrysler Sebring, MY 2013-2015 Ram Tradesman, MY 2012 Ram Van, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Grand Caravan, MY 2010-2016 Chrysler Town and Country, MY 2010-2017 Jeep Compass, MY 2011-2020 Dodge Durango, MY 2011-2020 Jeep Grand Cherokee, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Journey, MY 2010-2012 Jeep Liberty, MY 2010-2011 Jeep Nitro, and MY 2010-2011 Jeep Patriot vehicles.On December 2, 2019, ODI received a response from FCA that included vehicle production data, consumer complaints, field reports, warranty claims, manufacturer actions, production changes, and other data related to the alleged defect from the start of production (2010) through September 24, 2019.On January 27, 2020, ODI received an update to the December 2, 2019, IR response from FCA.On September 22, 2020, ODI requested additional subject vehicle AHR information from FCA.ODI received FCA's response on October 21, 2020.ODI subsequently received an update to FCA's October 21, 2020, response on February 16, 2021.During the investigation, ODI requested updates to certain IR questions on two occasions.FCA provided updates to question #2 on March 5, 2021, and questions #2 and #5 on May 26, 2023. FCA’s IR response data identified approximately 7.5 million subject vehicles (with approximately 15 million AHR assemblies).Due to the large number of vehicles and failure reports, ODI focused its analysis on the FCA vehicle model with the highest failure rate to represent the worst-case scenario.For this purpose, ODI focused on MY 2012-2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles for its analysis.This population includes 710,890 vehicles that FCA manufactured between August 19, 2011, and August 8, 2015.ODI identified 2,839 alleged AHR failures within this limited population.ODI identified 263 alleged injuries that were caused by AHR failures in MY 2012-2015 Grand Cherokees vehicles.Of these alleged injuries, ODI categorized them as eighty-two (82) soft tissue (neck/whiplash, bruise) injuries, four (4) concussions, fifty-nine (59) headaches, and one hundred eighteen (118) without a specific injury description.Although complainants have alleged injuries, ODI has been unable to obtain evidence to substantiate or validate any injuries where medical treatment was required.Consumer outreach was conducted by ODI, where sixty-three (63) FCA complainants with alleged injuries were contacted.Twelve of the sixty-three FCA consumers responded and were interviewed by ODI.ODI requested medical records, however, only one response was provided. Attorneys representing the responding complainant provided a synopsis that indicated they had experienced prior neck-related injuries dating to the mid-1990s.ODI also contacted one hundred (100) consumers who submitted Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (VOQ) in an attempt to validate alleged injuries. Despite the efforts of ODI, the office has been unsuccessful at obtaining substantive documentation/evidence supporting complaints that allege serious injuries (where pre-existing medical conditions did not already exist). In addition to the low severity of alleged injuries caused by AHR deployments, there have been eleven alleged crashes and two alleged lane departures within the entire subject vehicle population that has been in the field up to sixteen years (with over 8,500 AHR inadvertent deployments).ODI was not able to validate that the alleged crashes were the result of inadvertent head rest deployments, and the crashes were minor in nature. ODI has conducted a thorough investigation of the alleged safety defect and with up to sixteen years of exposure for some vehicles and over 8,500 inadvertent AHR deployments, no serious crashes or injuries could be validated in the sub-population of focus.The lack of serious injuries validated by ODI with such large period of field exposure is consistent with thework done by NHTSA’s Human Injury Research Division and the Biodynamic Research Corporation, which support that an inadvertent AHR deployment is not likely to cause serious injury.In addition to the low risk of injury, FCA released an extended warranty program that covers inadvertent AHR deployment for ten years / unlimited mileage from the vehicle's in-service date. PE19014 is closed with the FCA extended warranty program.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist, and the Agency reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by new circumstances. To review a complete closing summary, please the attached closing report. To review the ODI reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Seats

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened PE19014 on September 9, 2019, to investigate 128 consumer complaints alleging that the Active Head Rest (AHR) inadvertently deployed without the occurrence of a crash or other rear impact event in model year (MY) 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles.When ODI opened the investigation, ODI was aware of thirteen alleged injuries.A small number of Early Warning Reports identified driver and/or passenger front seat AHR inadvertent deployments without a rear impact event.Reported safety consequences resulting from the AHR deployments include concussions, headaches, soft tissue injuries, disorientation, nausea, vomiting and/or loss of vehicle control as a result of being surprised and distracted by being struck in the head by the inadvertent AHR deployment. On September 24, 2019, ODI sent an Information Request (IR) letter to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA).ODI requested certain detailed information from FCA related to the following subject vehicles: MY 2010-2014 Dodge Avenger 200, MY 2010-2014 Dodge Calber, MY 2010-2014 Chrysler Sebring, MY 2013-2015 Ram Tradesman, MY 2012 Ram Van, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Grand Caravan, MY 2010-2016 Chrysler Town and Country, MY 2010-2017 Jeep Compass, MY 2011-2020 Dodge Durango, MY 2011-2020 Jeep Grand Cherokee, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Journey, MY 2010-2012 Jeep Liberty, MY 2010-2011 Jeep Nitro, and MY 2010-2011 Jeep Patriot vehicles.On December 2, 2019, ODI received a response from FCA that included vehicle production data, consumer complaints, field reports, warranty claims, manufacturer actions, production changes, and other data related to the alleged defect from the start of production (2010) through September 24, 2019.On January 27, 2020, ODI received an update to the December 2, 2019, IR response from FCA.On September 22, 2020, ODI requested additional subject vehicle AHR information from FCA.ODI received FCA's response on October 21, 2020.ODI subsequently received an update to FCA's October 21, 2020, response on February 16, 2021.During the investigation, ODI requested updates to certain IR questions on two occasions.FCA provided updates to question #2 on March 5, 2021, and questions #2 and #5 on May 26, 2023. FCA’s IR response data identified approximately 7.5 million subject vehicles (with approximately 15 million AHR assemblies).Due to the large number of vehicles and failure reports, ODI focused its analysis on the FCA vehicle model with the highest failure rate to represent the worst-case scenario.For this purpose, ODI focused on MY 2012-2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles for its analysis.This population includes 710,890 vehicles that FCA manufactured between August 19, 2011, and August 8, 2015.ODI identified 2,839 alleged AHR failures within this limited population.ODI identified 263 alleged injuries that were caused by AHR failures in MY 2012-2015 Grand Cherokees vehicles.Of these alleged injuries, ODI categorized them as eighty-two (82) soft tissue (neck/whiplash, bruise) injuries, four (4) concussions, fifty-nine (59) headaches, and one hundred eighteen (118) without a specific injury description.Although complainants have alleged injuries, ODI has been unable to obtain evidence to substantiate or validate any injuries where medical treatment was required.Consumer outreach was conducted by ODI, where sixty-three (63) FCA complainants with alleged injuries were contacted.Twelve of the sixty-three FCA consumers responded and were interviewed by ODI.ODI requested medical records, however, only one response was provided. Attorneys representing the responding complainant provided a synopsis that indicated they had experienced prior neck-related injuries dating to the mid-1990s.ODI also contacted one hundred (100) consumers who submitted Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (VOQ) in an attempt to validate alleged injuries. Despite the efforts of ODI, the office has been unsuccessful at obtaining substantive documentation/evidence supporting complaints that allege serious injuries (where pre-existing medical conditions did not already exist). In addition to the low severity of alleged injuries caused by AHR deployments, there have been eleven alleged crashes and two alleged lane departures within the entire subject vehicle population that has been in the field up to sixteen years (with over 8,500 AHR inadvertent deployments).ODI was not able to validate that the alleged crashes were the result of inadvertent head rest deployments, and the crashes were minor in nature. ODI has conducted a thorough investigation of the alleged safety defect and with up to sixteen years of exposure for some vehicles and over 8,500 inadvertent AHR deployments, no serious crashes or injuries could be validated in the sub-population of focus.The lack of serious injuries validated by ODI with such large period of field exposure is consistent with thework done by NHTSA’s Human Injury Research Division and the Biodynamic Research Corporation, which support that an inadvertent AHR deployment is not likely to cause serious injury.In addition to the low risk of injury, FCA released an extended warranty program that covers inadvertent AHR deployment for ten years / unlimited mileage from the vehicle's in-service date. PE19014 is closed with the FCA extended warranty program.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist, and the Agency reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by new circumstances. To review a complete closing summary, please the attached closing report. To review the ODI reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.

Seats:front Assembly:head Restraint

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened PE19014 on September 9, 2019, to investigate 128 consumer complaints alleging that the Active Head Rest (AHR) inadvertently deployed without the occurrence of a crash or other rear impact event in model year (MY) 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles.When ODI opened the investigation, ODI was aware of thirteen alleged injuries.A small number of Early Warning Reports identified driver and/or passenger front seat AHR inadvertent deployments without a rear impact event.Reported safety consequences resulting from the AHR deployments include concussions, headaches, soft tissue injuries, disorientation, nausea, vomiting and/or loss of vehicle control as a result of being surprised and distracted by being struck in the head by the inadvertent AHR deployment. On September 24, 2019, ODI sent an Information Request (IR) letter to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA).ODI requested certain detailed information from FCA related to the following subject vehicles: MY 2010-2014 Dodge Avenger 200, MY 2010-2014 Dodge Calber, MY 2010-2014 Chrysler Sebring, MY 2013-2015 Ram Tradesman, MY 2012 Ram Van, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Grand Caravan, MY 2010-2016 Chrysler Town and Country, MY 2010-2017 Jeep Compass, MY 2011-2020 Dodge Durango, MY 2011-2020 Jeep Grand Cherokee, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Journey, MY 2010-2012 Jeep Liberty, MY 2010-2011 Jeep Nitro, and MY 2010-2011 Jeep Patriot vehicles.On December 2, 2019, ODI received a response from FCA that included vehicle production data, consumer complaints, field reports, warranty claims, manufacturer actions, production changes, and other data related to the alleged defect from the start of production (2010) through September 24, 2019.On January 27, 2020, ODI received an update to the December 2, 2019, IR response from FCA.On September 22, 2020, ODI requested additional subject vehicle AHR information from FCA.ODI received FCA's response on October 21, 2020.ODI subsequently received an update to FCA's October 21, 2020, response on February 16, 2021.During the investigation, ODI requested updates to certain IR questions on two occasions.FCA provided updates to question #2 on March 5, 2021, and questions #2 and #5 on May 26, 2023. FCA’s IR response data identified approximately 7.5 million subject vehicles (with approximately 15 million AHR assemblies).Due to the large number of vehicles and failure reports, ODI focused its analysis on the FCA vehicle model with the highest failure rate to represent the worst-case scenario.For this purpose, ODI focused on MY 2012-2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles for its analysis.This population includes 710,890 vehicles that FCA manufactured between August 19, 2011, and August 8, 2015.ODI identified 2,839 alleged AHR failures within this limited population.ODI identified 263 alleged injuries that were caused by AHR failures in MY 2012-2015 Grand Cherokees vehicles.Of these alleged injuries, ODI categorized them as eighty-two (82) soft tissue (neck/whiplash, bruise) injuries, four (4) concussions, fifty-nine (59) headaches, and one hundred eighteen (118) without a specific injury description.Although complainants have alleged injuries, ODI has been unable to obtain evidence to substantiate or validate any injuries where medical treatment was required.Consumer outreach was conducted by ODI, where sixty-three (63) FCA complainants with alleged injuries were contacted.Twelve of the sixty-three FCA consumers responded and were interviewed by ODI.ODI requested medical records, however, only one response was provided. Attorneys representing the responding complainant provided a synopsis that indicated they had experienced prior neck-related injuries dating to the mid-1990s.ODI also contacted one hundred (100) consumers who submitted Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (VOQ) in an attempt to validate alleged injuries. Despite the efforts of ODI, the office has been unsuccessful at obtaining substantive documentation/evidence supporting complaints that allege serious injuries (where pre-existing medical conditions did not already exist). In addition to the low severity of alleged injuries caused by AHR deployments, there have been eleven alleged crashes and two alleged lane departures within the entire subject vehicle population that has been in the field up to sixteen years (with over 8,500 AHR inadvertent deployments).ODI was not able to validate that the alleged crashes were the result of inadvertent head rest deployments, and the crashes were minor in nature. ODI has conducted a thorough investigation of the alleged safety defect and with up to sixteen years of exposure for some vehicles and over 8,500 inadvertent AHR deployments, no serious crashes or injuries could be validated in the sub-population of focus.The lack of serious injuries validated by ODI with such large period of field exposure is consistent with thework done by NHTSA’s Human Injury Research Division and the Biodynamic Research Corporation, which support that an inadvertent AHR deployment is not likely to cause serious injury.In addition to the low risk of injury, FCA released an extended warranty program that covers inadvertent AHR deployment for ten years / unlimited mileage from the vehicle's in-service date. PE19014 is closed with the FCA extended warranty program.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist, and the Agency reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by new circumstances. To review a complete closing summary, please the attached closing report. To review the ODI reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.

DP14004 · Totally Integrated Power Module Failure

Opened Sep 25, 2014 · Closed Jul 24, 2015

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System

In a letter dated August 21, 2014, the Center for Auto Safety (CAS) petitioned the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to initiate a defect investigation of alleged failures associated with the Totally Integrated Power Module (TIPM) installed in Chrysler SUV?s, trucks, and vans beginning in the 2007 model year. The petitioner alleges that TIPM defects may result in engine stall, airbag non-deployment, failure of fuel pump shutoff resulting in unintended acceleration, fire, and other symptoms. On September 25, 2014, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened DP14-004 to evaluate the petition for a grant or deny decision. ODI analyzed complaint data provided by CAS as well as complaints submitted to ODI from consumers. In total, there were 296 complaints submitted by the petitioner in the original petition and five supplements, including 271 complaints related to the subject vehicles equipped with TIPM-7. Approximately 3 percent of CAS complaints are related to vehicles equipped with TIPM-6 and ODI?s review of these complaints did not identify any safety defect trends. ODI conducted a detailed review of complaints narratives submitted by CAS and consumers including careful analysis of vehicle repair histories, warranty claims obtained from the manufacturer and any available Customer Assistance Inquiry reports (CAIR). Analysis of the field data indicated that MY2011-2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles exhibited significantly higher complaint rates related to fuel pump relay (FPR) failures than other subject vehicles. In a September 3, 2014 letter to NHTSA, Chrysler submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) identifying a defect in the FPR within the TIPM-7 which can result in a no start or stall condition in approximately 188,723 model year (MY) 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (WK) and Dodge Durango (WD) vehicles manufactured from January 5, 2010 through July 20, 2011 (14V-530).In a February 24, 2015 letter, Chrysler submitted a second DIR expanding the scope of the FPR defect condition to include an additional 338,216 MY 2012 through 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles manufactured from September 17, 2010 through August 19, 2013 and MY 2012 through 2013 Dodge Durango vehicles manufactured from January 18, 2011 through August 19, 2013 (15V-115).ODI analysis of the CAS allegations of TIPM defects resulting in stall while driving, airbag non-deployment, unintended acceleration, fire and other faults identified a single defect condition related to 1 of over 60 different circuits in the TIPM assembly. The most common effect of this defect condition, related to the fuel pump relay, was a no-start concern, but it could also result in stall while driving (76 complaints). No valid evidence was presented in support of claims related to airbag non-deployment, unintended acceleration or fire resulting from TIPM faults and these claims were found to be wholly without merit based on review of the field data and design of the relevant systems and components.Except insofar as the petitioner's contentions relate to the defect condition addressed by the Chrysler recalls, the factual bases of the petitioner's contentions that any further investigation is necessary are unsupported. In our view, additional investigation is unlikely to result in a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists or a NHTSA order for the notification and remedy of a safety-related defect as alleged by the petitioner at the conclusion of the requested investigation. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA's limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is den