← New search

2011 Chrysler Town And Country

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Town And Country years

Owner complaints for the 2011 Chrysler Town And Country are substantially higher than the model-year median of 216.5.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

554 reports with mileage · 219 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Electrical System. Review the 523 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Engine. Review the 107 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Fuel/propulsion System. Review the 106 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

10 crash reports12 fire reports12 injury reports

Service Brakes complaints

51 reports
Clear category filter
17,000 miles · Jun 13, 2013
EngineService Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 CHRYSLER TOWN AND COUNTRY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 25 MPH, THE BRAKES WERE NOT ENGAGING PROPERLY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSIS. THE TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THE BRAKES WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED. ADDITIONALLY, WHILE THE CONTACT WAS ACCELERATING, THE VEHICL…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 CHRYSLER TOWN AND COUNTRY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 25 MPH, THE BRAKES WERE NOT ENGAGING PROPERLY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSIS. THE TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THE BRAKES WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED. ADDITIONALLY, WHILE THE CONTACT WAS ACCELERATING, THE VEHICLE BECAME HESITANT. THE TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THE ENGINE HEAD WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED BECAUSE IT WAS INSTALLED INCORRECTLY WHEN MANUFACTURED. THE PART FOR REPLACEMENT WAS ON BACKORDER. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 17,000. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10519606

27,201 miles · Apr 30, 2013
Service Brakes

REAR BRAKE PADS WORE OUT PREMATURELY AT 27,201 MILES AND REQUIRED REPLACEMENT. FRONT BRAKE PADS ARE WORN VERY LITTLE (DEALER RATES BRAKE PAD WEAR FROM RED TO GREEN WITH GREEN THE BEST). FRONT BRAKES WERE RATED GREEN WHILE REAR PADS WERE RATED RED. I HAVE NEVER HAD REAR BRAKE PADS ON A NEW CAR REQUIRE REPLACEMENT WITH ONLY 27,000…

Read full complaint

REAR BRAKE PADS WORE OUT PREMATURELY AT 27,201 MILES AND REQUIRED REPLACEMENT. FRONT BRAKE PADS ARE WORN VERY LITTLE (DEALER RATES BRAKE PAD WEAR FROM RED TO GREEN WITH GREEN THE BEST). FRONT BRAKES WERE RATED GREEN WHILE REAR PADS WERE RATED RED. I HAVE NEVER HAD REAR BRAKE PADS ON A NEW CAR REQUIRE REPLACEMENT WITH ONLY 27,000 MILES. I SUSPECT THERE IS SOMETHING DEFECTIVE WITH THE BRAKING SYSTEM OR A COMPONENT THEREOF. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10510182

28,000 miles · Apr 24, 2013
Service Brakes

WE NOTICED WHEN COMING OFF OF THE FREEWAY A PULSATING/RUMBLING NOISE COMING FROM THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE. TOOK IT TO THE DEALER AND THEY TOLD US THE BRAKES WERE WORN AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED SOMETIME SOON. OUR VAN NOW HAS 34,000 MI AND OUR REAR BRAKES ARE NOW METAL TO METAL. GOING TO NEED PADS AND ROTORS. NEVER HEARD OF BRAKES …

Read full complaint

WE NOTICED WHEN COMING OFF OF THE FREEWAY A PULSATING/RUMBLING NOISE COMING FROM THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE. TOOK IT TO THE DEALER AND THEY TOLD US THE BRAKES WERE WORN AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED SOMETIME SOON. OUR VAN NOW HAS 34,000 MI AND OUR REAR BRAKES ARE NOW METAL TO METAL. GOING TO NEED PADS AND ROTORS. NEVER HEARD OF BRAKES GOING OUT WITH THAT FEW MILES. DEALER SAYS THAT IS NORMAL. MY OTHER CAR HAS 240K ON THE ORIGINAL REAR BRAKES. WHAT'S WRONG CHRYSLER???? *TR

NHTSA ODI #10509453

18,816 miles · Apr 10, 2013
Service Brakes

I TOOK MY VEHICLE IN FOR SERVICE BECAUSE THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS VIBRATING. THE DEALER STATED THE REAR BRAKES WERE WORN OUT. I THINK THIS IS VERY UNCOMMON SINCE THE VEHICLE ONLY HAS 18816 MILES. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10505860

32,545 miles · Feb 22, 2013
Service Brakes

PREMATURE FAILURE OF BRAKES/ROTORS. WAS EXPLAINED TO ME AT THE DEALERSHIP THAT IT'S NORMAL FOR THIS TO HAPPEN...CALIPERS STICKING WEARING BRAKES. CAUSED BY MY DRIVING? REPAIR COST OVER $400. FROM WHAT I READ ONLINE, I GOT LUCKY WITH GETTING 32K OUT OF MY REAR BRAKES. A COWORKER WITH THE SAME YEAR TOWN & COUNTRY 28K HAD THE SAME …

Read full complaint

PREMATURE FAILURE OF BRAKES/ROTORS. WAS EXPLAINED TO ME AT THE DEALERSHIP THAT IT'S NORMAL FOR THIS TO HAPPEN...CALIPERS STICKING WEARING BRAKES. CAUSED BY MY DRIVING? REPAIR COST OVER $400. FROM WHAT I READ ONLINE, I GOT LUCKY WITH GETTING 32K OUT OF MY REAR BRAKES. A COWORKER WITH THE SAME YEAR TOWN & COUNTRY 28K HAD THE SAME PROBLEM. CHRYSLER HAS A SERIOUS BRAKE PROBLEM THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. CHRYSLER CUSTOMER CARE IS NOT CONCERNED. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10499674

8,743 miles · Jan 25, 2013
Service Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 CHRYSLER TOWN AND COUNTRY. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 55 MPH WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED AND THE VEHICLE BEGAN TO SHAKE ABNORMALLY. THE FAILURE RECURRED WHENEVER THE VEHICLE WAS IN OPERATION. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER FIVE TIMES FOR THE FAILURE. THE DEALER PERFORM…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 CHRYSLER TOWN AND COUNTRY. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 55 MPH WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED AND THE VEHICLE BEGAN TO SHAKE ABNORMALLY. THE FAILURE RECURRED WHENEVER THE VEHICLE WAS IN OPERATION. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER FIVE TIMES FOR THE FAILURE. THE DEALER PERFORMED VARIOUS REPAIRS TO THE VEHICLE WHICH CONSISTED OF THE FRONT BRAKES BEING REPLACED FOUR TIMES AND FRONT ROTORS TWICE. IN ADDITION, THE FRONT ROTORS WERE RESURFACED ON TWO SEPARATE OCCASIONS AND BOTH FRONT TIRES WERE REPLACED DUE TO PREMATURE WEAR. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE PROBLEM. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 8,743.

NHTSA ODI #10494723

17,000 miles · Dec 19, 2012
Service Brakes

WHEN MY VEHICLE HAD ABOUT 16000 MILES ON IT, I NOTICED THAT WHEN BREAKING DURING HIGHWAY SPEEDS, THE VEHICLE WOULD VIBRATE. I TOOK THE VEHICLE TO MY DEALER AT ABOUT 17000 MILES AND WAS INFORMED THE ISSUE WAS CAUSED BY WARPED ROTORS. THE BRAKE PADS WERE FINE, BUT THE ROTORS WOULD NEED TO BE MACHINED OR REPLACED. I OPENED A TIC…

Read full complaint

WHEN MY VEHICLE HAD ABOUT 16000 MILES ON IT, I NOTICED THAT WHEN BREAKING DURING HIGHWAY SPEEDS, THE VEHICLE WOULD VIBRATE. I TOOK THE VEHICLE TO MY DEALER AT ABOUT 17000 MILES AND WAS INFORMED THE ISSUE WAS CAUSED BY WARPED ROTORS. THE BRAKE PADS WERE FINE, BUT THE ROTORS WOULD NEED TO BE MACHINED OR REPLACED. I OPENED A TICKET WITH CHRYSLER SINCE THE BRAKES WERE OUT OF WARRANTY AT 12000 MILES. THE AGREED TO COVER THE REPAIR. I ASKED FOR NEW ROTORS, BUT WAS INFORMED THAT THEY WERE ON A 4 MONTH BACK ORDER. I HAD HEM MACHINED INSTEAD, THOUGH I KNEW I WOULD BE BACK IN THE SAME BOAT SOON. ON 12-19-12, FOUR MONTHS LATER WITH 6000 MORE MILES, I TOOK THE VAN BACK INTO THE DEALER WITH THE SAME VIBRATING ISSUE, AND WAS AGAIN INFORMED THAT MY ROTORS WERE WARPED. THE BRAKES WERE FINE WITH 7/32 LEFT ON THEM. THE ROTORS WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED THIS TIME. AT 23000 MILES, THIS WOULD BE THE 2ND ROTOR ISSUE. I WAS INFORMED THE REPAIR WOULD COST $248, BUT CHRYSLER WOULD SPLIT IT WITH ME, WITH MY PART DOWN TO $124. THE SERVICE MGR STATED HE FELT THE ROTORS WEREN'T MADE WELL. THE TECH TOLD ME THIS KEEPS HAPPENING, AND THE CHRYSLER REP INFORMED ME THE NEW ROTORS WERE DIFFERENT, SO I SHOULDN'T HAVE THIS ISSUE AGAIN. IN MY MIND, THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF A DEFECT. I DO NO THINK I SHOULD HAVE TO PAY ANYTHING TO FIX A DEFECT. SOME 2011 TOWN AND COUNTRY VANS HAVE BEEN GRANTED AN EXTENDED WARRANTY ON THE BREAKS, BUT MINE IS NOT COVERED. I WAS ACTUALLY TOLD BY THE CHRYSLER REP THAT IT WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA TO POST THIS WITH THE NHTSA IN THE HOPES OF TRIGGERING A RECALL.I PLAN ON GETTING THE ROTORS NEXT WEEK, AS THEY ARE ON SPECIAL ORDER, BECAUSE THEY AREN'T AVAILABLE LOCALLY. IN 18 YEARS OF DRIVING, I HAVE NEVER REPLACED ROTORS BEFORE 60,000 MILES. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10489314

8,000 miles · Dec 2, 2012
Service Brakes

AFTER 8000 MILES, VEHICLE BEGAN TO SHAKE WHEN APPLYING BRAKES AT SPEEDS OVER 50 MPH. DEALER REPLACED BRAKES. NOW SIX MONTHS LATER AT ABOUT 15,000 MILES VEHICLE IS SHAKING AGAIN WHEN APPLYING BRAKES AT SPEEDS OVER 50 MPH. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10486703

9,000 miles · Oct 7, 2012
Service BrakesSteeringSuspension

SLIGHTLY BEFORE 9,000 MILES I STARTED NOTICING A SLIGHT SHIMMY OF THE STEERING WHEEL WHEN THE BRAKES WERE APPLIED WHEN DRIVING OVER 50MPH. THIS CONDITION DID NOT OCCUR CONSISTENTLY, BUT WAS SPORADIC. AS TIME HAS PAST, THIS CONDITION HAS BECOME MUCH MORE FREQUENT, THE STEERING WHEEL SHIMMY HAS BECOME MUCH MORE SEVERE, AND IS NOW …

Read full complaint

SLIGHTLY BEFORE 9,000 MILES I STARTED NOTICING A SLIGHT SHIMMY OF THE STEERING WHEEL WHEN THE BRAKES WERE APPLIED WHEN DRIVING OVER 50MPH. THIS CONDITION DID NOT OCCUR CONSISTENTLY, BUT WAS SPORADIC. AS TIME HAS PAST, THIS CONDITION HAS BECOME MUCH MORE FREQUENT, THE STEERING WHEEL SHIMMY HAS BECOME MUCH MORE SEVERE, AND IS NOW OCCURRING AT SPEEDS AS LOW AS 35MPH. I HAVE OWNED CHRYSLER TOWN AND COUNTRY VANS OVER THE PAST 16 YEARS (TRADING UP EVERY 2 YEARS) AND CAN TESTIFY THAT THEIR BRAKES HAVE BEEN A CONSISTENT WEAKNESS (TYPICALLY WARPED DISCS). MY PREVIOUS 2009 CHRYSLER T&C EVEN HAD A RECALL FOR THEIR BRAKES. HOWEVER, THIS SEVERE STEERING WHEEL SHIMMY THING IS SOMETHING THAT I HAVE NEVER SEEN IN THE PAST AND I AM AFRAID THAT IT IS APPROACHING A VIOLENT SITUATION THAT MAY CAUSE LOSS OF CONTROL. THE MILEAGE ON THE VEHICLE IS FAR TOO LOW FOR A BRAKE WEAR ISSUE. FURTHERMORE, A WARPED DISC WOULD BE NOTICEABLE WHEN BREAKING AT ALL SPEEDS. I AM ABOUT TO GO TO MY DEALER WITH THIS, BUT AM CHECKING THE INTERNET TO SEE IF THIS IS A KNOWN ISSUE AND IF THERE ARE ANY EXISTING RECALLS. THESE OBSERVATIONS ARE MADE FROM MY 30 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE AS A MECHANICAL ENGINEER AND FORMER HEAD OF PRODUCT RELIABILITY AT MOTOROLA. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10478904

4,000 miles · Jul 31, 2012
Service Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 CHRYSLER TOWN AND COUNTRY TOURING. THE CONTACT WAS TRAVELING 55 MPH WHEN THE BRAKES WERE DEPRESSED AND THE VEHICLE STARTED TO SHAKE. THE VEHICLE ALSO FAILED TO STOP PROPERLY. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO THE DEALER. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS …

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 CHRYSLER TOWN AND COUNTRY TOURING. THE CONTACT WAS TRAVELING 55 MPH WHEN THE BRAKES WERE DEPRESSED AND THE VEHICLE STARTED TO SHAKE. THE VEHICLE ALSO FAILED TO STOP PROPERLY. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO THE DEALER. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 4,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 4,600.

NHTSA ODI #10468397

Official recalls

3

25V876000 · Equipment Adaptive/mobility:wheelchair Restraints/securement:latch/anchor:

Dec 17, 2025

Rollx Vans (Rollx) is recalling certain GMC Yukon, Sierra, Chevrolet Express 2500, Ford Transit, E-250, Toyota Sienna, Sienna Hybrid, Honda Odyssey, Chrysler Town and Country, Voyager, Pacifica, Dodge Grand Caravan, and Ram Promaster vehicles equipped with QRT-Deluxe and QRT-Max wheelchair restraints. Please refer to Rollx's recall report for specific model year information. The retractors may not lock, preventing the wheelchair from being properly secured.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An unsecured wheelchair can move during transit, increasing the risk of injury.

Remedy: Rollx will work with Q'Straint to inspect and replace the retractors as necessary, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed February 5, 2026. Owners may contact Rollx's customer service at 1-800-956-6668.

14V234000 · Electrical System

May 7, 2014

Chrysler Group, LLC (Chrysler) is recalling certain model year 2010-2014 Chrysler Town and Country and Dodge Grand Caravan vehicles manufactured August 25, 2010, through October 31, 2013. The affected vehicles may experience overheating of the vent window switch in the driver's door armrest.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An overheated switch may result in a vehicle fire.

Remedy: Chrysler will notify owners, and dealers will replace the vent window switch with a newer version, free of charge. The owner notification letter was issued and the remedy campaign launched on on December 31, 2014. Owners may contact Chrysler customer service at 1-800-853-1403. Chrysler's number for this recall is P25.

11V315000 · Steering:column

Jun 8, 2011

CHRYSLER IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2011DODGE JOURNEY, JEEP WRANGLER, CHRYSLER 200, CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE, DODGE AVENGER, DODGE NITRO, JEEP LIBERTY, DODGE CALIBER, JEEP COMPASS, JEEP PATRIOT, DODGE GRAND CARAVAN AND CHRYSLER TOWN & COUNTRY VEHICLES. SOME OF THESE VEHICLES MAY HAVE BEEN BUILT WITH A MISSING OR INCORRECTLY INSTALLED STEERING COLUMN PIVOT RIVET.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A MISSING OR INCORRECTLY INSTALLED RIVET COULD COMPROMISE THE ABILITY OF THE STEERING COLUMN TO SUPPORT THE OCCUPANT LOADS IN THE EVENT OF A FRONTAL CRASH, DECREASING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE FRONTAL IMPACT SAFETY SYSTEM. AS A RESULT, THE CONDITION MAY INCREASE THE POTENTIAL FOR INJURY IN A FRONTAL CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT FOR RIVET PRESENCE AND ALIGNMENT AND REPAIR THE STEERING COLUMN PIVOT AS REQUIRED, FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON JULY 4, 2011. OWNERS MAY CONTACT CHRYSLER AT 1-800-853-1403.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

2

PE19014 · Active Head Rest Inadvertent Deployment

Opened Sep 9, 2019 · Closed Feb 25, 2026

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Seats; Seats:front Assembly:head Restraint

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened PE19014 on September 9, 2019, to investigate 128 consumer complaints alleging that the Active Head Rest (AHR) inadvertently deployed without the occurrence of a crash or other rear impact event in model year (MY) 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles.When ODI opened the investigation, ODI was aware of thirteen alleged injuries.A small number of Early Warning Reports identified driver and/or passenger front seat AHR inadvertent deployments without a rear impact event.Reported safety consequences resulting from the AHR deployments include concussions, headaches, soft tissue injuries, disorientation, nausea, vomiting and/or loss of vehicle control as a result of being surprised and distracted by being struck in the head by the inadvertent AHR deployment. On September 24, 2019, ODI sent an Information Request (IR) letter to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA).ODI requested certain detailed information from FCA related to the following subject vehicles: MY 2010-2014 Dodge Avenger 200, MY 2010-2014 Dodge Calber, MY 2010-2014 Chrysler Sebring, MY 2013-2015 Ram Tradesman, MY 2012 Ram Van, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Grand Caravan, MY 2010-2016 Chrysler Town and Country, MY 2010-2017 Jeep Compass, MY 2011-2020 Dodge Durango, MY 2011-2020 Jeep Grand Cherokee, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Journey, MY 2010-2012 Jeep Liberty, MY 2010-2011 Jeep Nitro, and MY 2010-2011 Jeep Patriot vehicles.On December 2, 2019, ODI received a response from FCA that included vehicle production data, consumer complaints, field reports, warranty claims, manufacturer actions, production changes, and other data related to the alleged defect from the start of production (2010) through September 24, 2019.On January 27, 2020, ODI received an update to the December 2, 2019, IR response from FCA.On September 22, 2020, ODI requested additional subject vehicle AHR information from FCA.ODI received FCA's response on October 21, 2020.ODI subsequently received an update to FCA's October 21, 2020, response on February 16, 2021.During the investigation, ODI requested updates to certain IR questions on two occasions.FCA provided updates to question #2 on March 5, 2021, and questions #2 and #5 on May 26, 2023. FCA’s IR response data identified approximately 7.5 million subject vehicles (with approximately 15 million AHR assemblies).Due to the large number of vehicles and failure reports, ODI focused its analysis on the FCA vehicle model with the highest failure rate to represent the worst-case scenario.For this purpose, ODI focused on MY 2012-2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles for its analysis.This population includes 710,890 vehicles that FCA manufactured between August 19, 2011, and August 8, 2015.ODI identified 2,839 alleged AHR failures within this limited population.ODI identified 263 alleged injuries that were caused by AHR failures in MY 2012-2015 Grand Cherokees vehicles.Of these alleged injuries, ODI categorized them as eighty-two (82) soft tissue (neck/whiplash, bruise) injuries, four (4) concussions, fifty-nine (59) headaches, and one hundred eighteen (118) without a specific injury description.Although complainants have alleged injuries, ODI has been unable to obtain evidence to substantiate or validate any injuries where medical treatment was required.Consumer outreach was conducted by ODI, where sixty-three (63) FCA complainants with alleged injuries were contacted.Twelve of the sixty-three FCA consumers responded and were interviewed by ODI.ODI requested medical records, however, only one response was provided. Attorneys representing the responding complainant provided a synopsis that indicated they had experienced prior neck-related injuries dating to the mid-1990s.ODI also contacted one hundred (100) consumers who submitted Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (VOQ) in an attempt to validate alleged injuries. Despite the efforts of ODI, the office has been unsuccessful at obtaining substantive documentation/evidence supporting complaints that allege serious injuries (where pre-existing medical conditions did not already exist). In addition to the low severity of alleged injuries caused by AHR deployments, there have been eleven alleged crashes and two alleged lane departures within the entire subject vehicle population that has been in the field up to sixteen years (with over 8,500 AHR inadvertent deployments).ODI was not able to validate that the alleged crashes were the result of inadvertent head rest deployments, and the crashes were minor in nature. ODI has conducted a thorough investigation of the alleged safety defect and with up to sixteen years of exposure for some vehicles and over 8,500 inadvertent AHR deployments, no serious crashes or injuries could be validated in the sub-population of focus.The lack of serious injuries validated by ODI with such large period of field exposure is consistent with thework done by NHTSA’s Human Injury Research Division and the Biodynamic Research Corporation, which support that an inadvertent AHR deployment is not likely to cause serious injury.In addition to the low risk of injury, FCA released an extended warranty program that covers inadvertent AHR deployment for ten years / unlimited mileage from the vehicle's in-service date. PE19014 is closed with the FCA extended warranty program.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist, and the Agency reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by new circumstances. To review a complete closing summary, please the attached closing report. To review the ODI reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Seats

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened PE19014 on September 9, 2019, to investigate 128 consumer complaints alleging that the Active Head Rest (AHR) inadvertently deployed without the occurrence of a crash or other rear impact event in model year (MY) 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles.When ODI opened the investigation, ODI was aware of thirteen alleged injuries.A small number of Early Warning Reports identified driver and/or passenger front seat AHR inadvertent deployments without a rear impact event.Reported safety consequences resulting from the AHR deployments include concussions, headaches, soft tissue injuries, disorientation, nausea, vomiting and/or loss of vehicle control as a result of being surprised and distracted by being struck in the head by the inadvertent AHR deployment. On September 24, 2019, ODI sent an Information Request (IR) letter to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA).ODI requested certain detailed information from FCA related to the following subject vehicles: MY 2010-2014 Dodge Avenger 200, MY 2010-2014 Dodge Calber, MY 2010-2014 Chrysler Sebring, MY 2013-2015 Ram Tradesman, MY 2012 Ram Van, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Grand Caravan, MY 2010-2016 Chrysler Town and Country, MY 2010-2017 Jeep Compass, MY 2011-2020 Dodge Durango, MY 2011-2020 Jeep Grand Cherokee, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Journey, MY 2010-2012 Jeep Liberty, MY 2010-2011 Jeep Nitro, and MY 2010-2011 Jeep Patriot vehicles.On December 2, 2019, ODI received a response from FCA that included vehicle production data, consumer complaints, field reports, warranty claims, manufacturer actions, production changes, and other data related to the alleged defect from the start of production (2010) through September 24, 2019.On January 27, 2020, ODI received an update to the December 2, 2019, IR response from FCA.On September 22, 2020, ODI requested additional subject vehicle AHR information from FCA.ODI received FCA's response on October 21, 2020.ODI subsequently received an update to FCA's October 21, 2020, response on February 16, 2021.During the investigation, ODI requested updates to certain IR questions on two occasions.FCA provided updates to question #2 on March 5, 2021, and questions #2 and #5 on May 26, 2023. FCA’s IR response data identified approximately 7.5 million subject vehicles (with approximately 15 million AHR assemblies).Due to the large number of vehicles and failure reports, ODI focused its analysis on the FCA vehicle model with the highest failure rate to represent the worst-case scenario.For this purpose, ODI focused on MY 2012-2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles for its analysis.This population includes 710,890 vehicles that FCA manufactured between August 19, 2011, and August 8, 2015.ODI identified 2,839 alleged AHR failures within this limited population.ODI identified 263 alleged injuries that were caused by AHR failures in MY 2012-2015 Grand Cherokees vehicles.Of these alleged injuries, ODI categorized them as eighty-two (82) soft tissue (neck/whiplash, bruise) injuries, four (4) concussions, fifty-nine (59) headaches, and one hundred eighteen (118) without a specific injury description.Although complainants have alleged injuries, ODI has been unable to obtain evidence to substantiate or validate any injuries where medical treatment was required.Consumer outreach was conducted by ODI, where sixty-three (63) FCA complainants with alleged injuries were contacted.Twelve of the sixty-three FCA consumers responded and were interviewed by ODI.ODI requested medical records, however, only one response was provided. Attorneys representing the responding complainant provided a synopsis that indicated they had experienced prior neck-related injuries dating to the mid-1990s.ODI also contacted one hundred (100) consumers who submitted Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (VOQ) in an attempt to validate alleged injuries. Despite the efforts of ODI, the office has been unsuccessful at obtaining substantive documentation/evidence supporting complaints that allege serious injuries (where pre-existing medical conditions did not already exist). In addition to the low severity of alleged injuries caused by AHR deployments, there have been eleven alleged crashes and two alleged lane departures within the entire subject vehicle population that has been in the field up to sixteen years (with over 8,500 AHR inadvertent deployments).ODI was not able to validate that the alleged crashes were the result of inadvertent head rest deployments, and the crashes were minor in nature. ODI has conducted a thorough investigation of the alleged safety defect and with up to sixteen years of exposure for some vehicles and over 8,500 inadvertent AHR deployments, no serious crashes or injuries could be validated in the sub-population of focus.The lack of serious injuries validated by ODI with such large period of field exposure is consistent with thework done by NHTSA’s Human Injury Research Division and the Biodynamic Research Corporation, which support that an inadvertent AHR deployment is not likely to cause serious injury.In addition to the low risk of injury, FCA released an extended warranty program that covers inadvertent AHR deployment for ten years / unlimited mileage from the vehicle's in-service date. PE19014 is closed with the FCA extended warranty program.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist, and the Agency reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by new circumstances. To review a complete closing summary, please the attached closing report. To review the ODI reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.

Seats:front Assembly:head Restraint

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened PE19014 on September 9, 2019, to investigate 128 consumer complaints alleging that the Active Head Rest (AHR) inadvertently deployed without the occurrence of a crash or other rear impact event in model year (MY) 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles.When ODI opened the investigation, ODI was aware of thirteen alleged injuries.A small number of Early Warning Reports identified driver and/or passenger front seat AHR inadvertent deployments without a rear impact event.Reported safety consequences resulting from the AHR deployments include concussions, headaches, soft tissue injuries, disorientation, nausea, vomiting and/or loss of vehicle control as a result of being surprised and distracted by being struck in the head by the inadvertent AHR deployment. On September 24, 2019, ODI sent an Information Request (IR) letter to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA).ODI requested certain detailed information from FCA related to the following subject vehicles: MY 2010-2014 Dodge Avenger 200, MY 2010-2014 Dodge Calber, MY 2010-2014 Chrysler Sebring, MY 2013-2015 Ram Tradesman, MY 2012 Ram Van, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Grand Caravan, MY 2010-2016 Chrysler Town and Country, MY 2010-2017 Jeep Compass, MY 2011-2020 Dodge Durango, MY 2011-2020 Jeep Grand Cherokee, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Journey, MY 2010-2012 Jeep Liberty, MY 2010-2011 Jeep Nitro, and MY 2010-2011 Jeep Patriot vehicles.On December 2, 2019, ODI received a response from FCA that included vehicle production data, consumer complaints, field reports, warranty claims, manufacturer actions, production changes, and other data related to the alleged defect from the start of production (2010) through September 24, 2019.On January 27, 2020, ODI received an update to the December 2, 2019, IR response from FCA.On September 22, 2020, ODI requested additional subject vehicle AHR information from FCA.ODI received FCA's response on October 21, 2020.ODI subsequently received an update to FCA's October 21, 2020, response on February 16, 2021.During the investigation, ODI requested updates to certain IR questions on two occasions.FCA provided updates to question #2 on March 5, 2021, and questions #2 and #5 on May 26, 2023. FCA’s IR response data identified approximately 7.5 million subject vehicles (with approximately 15 million AHR assemblies).Due to the large number of vehicles and failure reports, ODI focused its analysis on the FCA vehicle model with the highest failure rate to represent the worst-case scenario.For this purpose, ODI focused on MY 2012-2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles for its analysis.This population includes 710,890 vehicles that FCA manufactured between August 19, 2011, and August 8, 2015.ODI identified 2,839 alleged AHR failures within this limited population.ODI identified 263 alleged injuries that were caused by AHR failures in MY 2012-2015 Grand Cherokees vehicles.Of these alleged injuries, ODI categorized them as eighty-two (82) soft tissue (neck/whiplash, bruise) injuries, four (4) concussions, fifty-nine (59) headaches, and one hundred eighteen (118) without a specific injury description.Although complainants have alleged injuries, ODI has been unable to obtain evidence to substantiate or validate any injuries where medical treatment was required.Consumer outreach was conducted by ODI, where sixty-three (63) FCA complainants with alleged injuries were contacted.Twelve of the sixty-three FCA consumers responded and were interviewed by ODI.ODI requested medical records, however, only one response was provided. Attorneys representing the responding complainant provided a synopsis that indicated they had experienced prior neck-related injuries dating to the mid-1990s.ODI also contacted one hundred (100) consumers who submitted Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (VOQ) in an attempt to validate alleged injuries. Despite the efforts of ODI, the office has been unsuccessful at obtaining substantive documentation/evidence supporting complaints that allege serious injuries (where pre-existing medical conditions did not already exist). In addition to the low severity of alleged injuries caused by AHR deployments, there have been eleven alleged crashes and two alleged lane departures within the entire subject vehicle population that has been in the field up to sixteen years (with over 8,500 AHR inadvertent deployments).ODI was not able to validate that the alleged crashes were the result of inadvertent head rest deployments, and the crashes were minor in nature. ODI has conducted a thorough investigation of the alleged safety defect and with up to sixteen years of exposure for some vehicles and over 8,500 inadvertent AHR deployments, no serious crashes or injuries could be validated in the sub-population of focus.The lack of serious injuries validated by ODI with such large period of field exposure is consistent with thework done by NHTSA’s Human Injury Research Division and the Biodynamic Research Corporation, which support that an inadvertent AHR deployment is not likely to cause serious injury.In addition to the low risk of injury, FCA released an extended warranty program that covers inadvertent AHR deployment for ten years / unlimited mileage from the vehicle's in-service date. PE19014 is closed with the FCA extended warranty program.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist, and the Agency reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by new circumstances. To review a complete closing summary, please the attached closing report. To review the ODI reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.

DP14004 · Totally Integrated Power Module Failure

Opened Sep 25, 2014 · Closed Jul 24, 2015

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System

In a letter dated August 21, 2014, the Center for Auto Safety (CAS) petitioned the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to initiate a defect investigation of alleged failures associated with the Totally Integrated Power Module (TIPM) installed in Chrysler SUV?s, trucks, and vans beginning in the 2007 model year. The petitioner alleges that TIPM defects may result in engine stall, airbag non-deployment, failure of fuel pump shutoff resulting in unintended acceleration, fire, and other symptoms. On September 25, 2014, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened DP14-004 to evaluate the petition for a grant or deny decision. ODI analyzed complaint data provided by CAS as well as complaints submitted to ODI from consumers. In total, there were 296 complaints submitted by the petitioner in the original petition and five supplements, including 271 complaints related to the subject vehicles equipped with TIPM-7. Approximately 3 percent of CAS complaints are related to vehicles equipped with TIPM-6 and ODI?s review of these complaints did not identify any safety defect trends. ODI conducted a detailed review of complaints narratives submitted by CAS and consumers including careful analysis of vehicle repair histories, warranty claims obtained from the manufacturer and any available Customer Assistance Inquiry reports (CAIR). Analysis of the field data indicated that MY2011-2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles exhibited significantly higher complaint rates related to fuel pump relay (FPR) failures than other subject vehicles. In a September 3, 2014 letter to NHTSA, Chrysler submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) identifying a defect in the FPR within the TIPM-7 which can result in a no start or stall condition in approximately 188,723 model year (MY) 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (WK) and Dodge Durango (WD) vehicles manufactured from January 5, 2010 through July 20, 2011 (14V-530).In a February 24, 2015 letter, Chrysler submitted a second DIR expanding the scope of the FPR defect condition to include an additional 338,216 MY 2012 through 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles manufactured from September 17, 2010 through August 19, 2013 and MY 2012 through 2013 Dodge Durango vehicles manufactured from January 18, 2011 through August 19, 2013 (15V-115).ODI analysis of the CAS allegations of TIPM defects resulting in stall while driving, airbag non-deployment, unintended acceleration, fire and other faults identified a single defect condition related to 1 of over 60 different circuits in the TIPM assembly. The most common effect of this defect condition, related to the fuel pump relay, was a no-start concern, but it could also result in stall while driving (76 complaints). No valid evidence was presented in support of claims related to airbag non-deployment, unintended acceleration or fire resulting from TIPM faults and these claims were found to be wholly without merit based on review of the field data and design of the relevant systems and components.Except insofar as the petitioner's contentions relate to the defect condition addressed by the Chrysler recalls, the factual bases of the petitioner's contentions that any further investigation is necessary are unsupported. In our view, additional investigation is unlikely to result in a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists or a NHTSA order for the notification and remedy of a safety-related defect as alleged by the petitioner at the conclusion of the requested investigation. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA's limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is den