IllustrationFRONT END SHIMMIES AT 50-60 MPH. *DSH
1995 Chevrolet Camaro
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
More warning signs than most Camaro years
Owner complaints for the 1995 Chevrolet Camaro are substantially higher than the model-year median of 32.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Camaro years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
Limited mileage data: 11 of 216 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 60 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Air Bags. Review the 32 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Power Train. Review the 23 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
39 crash reports22 fire reports20 injury reports
What owners actually said
216 reportsPROBLEM WITH PASSENGER'S SUNVISOR. *AK
ABS BRAKING PROBLEMS. TT WHNE THIS VEHICLE IS DRIVEN IN THE RAON, THE BRAKING ABILITY IS ALMOST NON EXISTENT UNLESS VEHICLE IS DRIVEN WITH BRAKES APPLIED TO HEAT AND TEMPORARILY DRY OUT FRONT BRAKE ASSEMBLIES, VEHICLE IS ALSO VERY UNSTABLE ON WET ROADS AS FACTORY TIRES HYDROPLANE WITH NO WARNING AT ANY SPEED FROM 35 MPH AND UP,…
Read full complaint
ABS BRAKING PROBLEMS. TT WHNE THIS VEHICLE IS DRIVEN IN THE RAON, THE BRAKING ABILITY IS ALMOST NON EXISTENT UNLESS VEHICLE IS DRIVEN WITH BRAKES APPLIED TO HEAT AND TEMPORARILY DRY OUT FRONT BRAKE ASSEMBLIES, VEHICLE IS ALSO VERY UNSTABLE ON WET ROADS AS FACTORY TIRES HYDROPLANE WITH NO WARNING AT ANY SPEED FROM 35 MPH AND UP, DEALERSHIP DID A COMPLETE INSPECTION OF BRAKE SYSTEM AND FOUND NO DEFECTIVE PARTS IN THE BRAKING SYSTEM.*JB
NO DEPLOYMENT OF DRIVER'S AIRBAG, CAUSING INJURY IN ABOVE ACCIDENT. *SD
MANUAL TRANSMISSION WOULD NOT GO INTO GEAR AT STOP. *TT
DEPLOYMENT OF AIRBAGS WAS VIOLENT, CAUSING BURN INJURIES TO CHEST/ARMS/SCALP AND SCARRING OF VOCAL CORDS. *SD
THE DRIVERS AIR BAG DIDN'T DEPLOY CONSUMER WAS INJURED IN THE CAR . TT *JB
W/EMERGENCY BRAKE APPLIED, DRIVER GOT OUT OF CAR. OWNER WALKED AWAY HEARD POP SOUND, VEHICLE BEGAN TO ROLL HITTING (3) CARS. PLEASE DESCRIBE DETAILS. TT
CAR HYDROPLANED, SPINNING, HIT GUARD RAIL, NEITHER AIR BAG DEPLOYED. TT
EXPERIENCING INTERMITTENT STALLING PROBLEM, CANNOT IDENTIFY PROBLEM COMPONENT. TT
Official recalls
195V046000 · Steering:gear Box (other Than Rack And Pinion)
Mar 22, 1995
THE STEERING INTERMEDIATE SHAFT COULD HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY ASSEMBLED CAUSING THE SHAFT LOWER COUPLING TO LOOSEN AND ROTATE ON THE STEERING GEAR INPUT SHAFT.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THIS CONDITION CAN RESULT IN A LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL INCREASING THE POTENTIAL FOR A VEHICLE ACCIDENT.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE INTERMEDIATE STEERING SHAFT FOR THE CORRECT LOWER COUPLING AND REPLACE IT AS REQUIRED.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
2EA97024 · Fuel Tube Retaining Clip Failure
Opened Nov 13, 1997 · Closed Sep 29, 1998
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Vehicle Speed Control:linkages
MOST OF THE REPORTS REVIEWED IN THIS INVESTIGATION ARE FIRE INCIDENTS IN WHICH FUEL LEAKAGE HAS BEEN ALLEGED AS THE CAUSE OR THE AREA OF ORIGIN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ALLEGED DEFECT.THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THE SUBJECT CLIP WAS A FACTOR IN ANY OF THESE FIRE INCIDENTS AND NHTSA TESTING INDICATES THATBROKEN OR DISLODGED RETENTION CLIP DOES NOT RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT MOVEMENT OF THE FUEL LINE BUNDLE TOWARD THE LEFT SECONDARY AIR INJECTION CHECK VALVE.FAILURE OF THE CLIP PLACES THE FUEL LINE BUNDLE ASSEMBLY IN THE SAME CONFIGURATION AS THE 1993 MODEL YEAR LTI VEHICLES.A SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT TREND HAS NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED AT THIS TIME AND FURTHER USE OF AGENCY RESOURCES DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE WARRANTED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE FURTHER ACTION IF WARRANTED BY THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
PE97036 · Fuel Tub Retaining Clip Failure
Opened Jul 24, 1997 · Closed Nov 13, 1997
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Vehicle Speed Control:linkages
OWNERS HAVE REPORTED FAILURES OF THE FUEL TUBE RETENTION CLIP THAT ATTACHES TO THE PLASTIC THROTTLE LINKAGE COVER.ACCORDING TO GM, THE SUBJECT RETENTION CLIP (P/N 12048089) WAS IMPLEMENTED IN PRODUCTION ON OCTOBER 12, 1993, TO ADDRESS A CONCERN WITH INCORRECT ASSEMBLY PLANT FUEL LINE ROUTING.MIS-ROUTED FUEL TUBES MAY FAIL FROM CONTACT WITH A HOT AIR CHECK VALVE, CREATING A FIRE HAZARD IN THE ENGINE COMPARTMENT.GM MAINTAINS THAT NO PROBLEMS SHOULD OCCUR IF THE CLIP IS PROPERLY INSTALLED AND ISN'T MISHANDLED DURING SUBSEQUENT SERVICE OPERATIONS.SOME OWNERS HAVE ALLEGED TO ODI THAT THE SUBJECT CLIP BECOMES BRITTLE OVER TIME AND MAY ALSO PULL FREE OF THE THROTTLE LINKAGE COVER ATTACHMENT HOLE.