ABS BRAKES MALFUNCTIONED, RESULTING IN EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCE. *AK *ML
1994 Chevrolet Blazer
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
More warning signs than most Blazer years
Owner complaints for the 1994 Chevrolet Blazer are substantially higher than the model-year median of 32.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Blazer years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
Limited mileage data: 26 of 620 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 429 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Visibility. Review the 50 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Fuel System, Gasoline. Review the 45 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
What owners actually said
620 reportsAPPROACHING AN INTERSECTION, BRAKES WERE APPLIED WITH NO BRAKING ACTION OCCURRING. THE ANTILOCK SYSTEM MADE NOISES AS THOUGH CAR WAS ON A SLIPPERY SURFACE, BUT ROAD WAS CLEAR AND DRY WITH NO LOOSE GRAVEL. BRAKE PEDAL WAS THEN PUSHED VERY HARD, AGAIN WITH NO BRAKING ACTION. THE CAR PROCEEDED INTO THE INTERSECTION IMPACTING ANO…
Read full complaint
APPROACHING AN INTERSECTION, BRAKES WERE APPLIED WITH NO BRAKING ACTION OCCURRING. THE ANTILOCK SYSTEM MADE NOISES AS THOUGH CAR WAS ON A SLIPPERY SURFACE, BUT ROAD WAS CLEAR AND DRY WITH NO LOOSE GRAVEL. BRAKE PEDAL WAS THEN PUSHED VERY HARD, AGAIN WITH NO BRAKING ACTION. THE CAR PROCEEDED INTO THE INTERSECTION IMPACTING ANOTHER VEHICLE. BOTH DRIVERS RECEIVED MINOR INJURIES. THE BLAZER WAS A TOTAL LOSS. *AK
WHILE DRIVING THE ABS LIGHT CAME ON. WHEN STEPPING ON THE BRAKES, BRAKES FAILED, RESULTING IN EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCE JUST AS MENTIONED IN MANUFACTURER'S RECALLS 9335 AND 9332 THE REPAIRS NEEDED DO NOT FALL UNDER THE RECALL, AND OWNER MUST PAY FOR REPAIRS NEEDED. *AK *ML
ABS BRAKES AND LINEAR EXHAUST GAS RECIRCULATION VALVE (EGR VALVE) FAILED. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. *AK
BRAKES MAKE NOISE ALL THE TIME, BUT DID NOT THE NIGHT OF THE ACCIDENT. CONDITIONS WERE SNOWY. *AK
VEHICLE HAD ROUGH IDLE, CLEANED EGR VALVE. REOCCURRING PROBLEM. *AK
I HAVE CONTACTED (2) CHEVORLET DEALERS AND THEY CAN NOT FIND THE PROBLEM,THEY DID TELL ME THEIR WAS A RECALL ,BUT WE HAVE NOT BEEN CONTACTED AT THIS POINT . I WOULD GREATLEY APPRICIATE YOUR HELP ON THIS MATTER. NO SAFETY DEFECT LISTED WITHIN SUMMARY. *AK
AFTER THE ACCIDENT; I FOUND BY RESEARCHING YOUR SITE THAT THERE ARE TWO RECALLS ON DEFECTS PERTAINING TO THE BRAKES ON MY VEHICLE. MFG.# 99I006000- MAILING OF RECALL NOTICE TO BEGIN MAY OF 2000. ALSO MFG. CAMPAIGN # 99041- MAILING TO BEGIN MAY, 20000. I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY MAILING TO WARN ME OF THIS DEFECT. MAY OF 2000 IS …
Read full complaint
AFTER THE ACCIDENT; I FOUND BY RESEARCHING YOUR SITE THAT THERE ARE TWO RECALLS ON DEFECTS PERTAINING TO THE BRAKES ON MY VEHICLE. MFG.# 99I006000- MAILING OF RECALL NOTICE TO BEGIN MAY OF 2000. ALSO MFG. CAMPAIGN # 99041- MAILING TO BEGIN MAY, 20000. I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY MAILING TO WARN ME OF THIS DEFECT. MAY OF 2000 IS TOO LATE. I HAVE ALREADY HAD THE ACCIDENT!!!!*AK
CALLED/ EMAILED GM AND ALTHOUGH I HAD A FAILURE THE DAY AFTER MY NEW BRAKES WERE DEALER INSTALLED AND EVEN THOUGH I HAVE A BLAZER IN THE YEARS RECALLED I AM NOT SUBJECT TO THE RECALL. THIS REALLY UPSETS ME BECAUSE I COULD INJURED SOMEONEON THE STREET ON IN MY CAR AND THEY CONTINUE TO PRETEND THAT THIS DID NOT HAPPEN. I FILED A R…
Read full complaint
CALLED/ EMAILED GM AND ALTHOUGH I HAD A FAILURE THE DAY AFTER MY NEW BRAKES WERE DEALER INSTALLED AND EVEN THOUGH I HAVE A BLAZER IN THE YEARS RECALLED I AM NOT SUBJECT TO THE RECALL. THIS REALLY UPSETS ME BECAUSE I COULD INJURED SOMEONEON THE STREET ON IN MY CAR AND THEY CONTINUE TO PRETEND THAT THIS DID NOT HAPPEN. I FILED A REPORT W/ YOU IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE INCIDENT- BRAKES PUT ON ONE DAY- NEXT DAY I AM, FORTUNATELY, MAKING A SLOW TURN AS I HEAD TO COURT, CANNOT NEGOTIATE THE TURN BECAUSE I HAVE NO BRAKES AND SLAM INTON AND ON TOP OF A FIRE HYDRANT. THE TOW TRUCK DRIVER/ MECHANIC AT THE SCENE AND THE OFFICER AT THE SCENE BOTH DEPRESSED THE PEDAL AND CONFIRMED WHAT I SAID. THE DEALER AND GM DENIED IT AND- EVEN THOUGH THERE IS A MAJOR RECALL- AND I AM A TRUE VICTIM- AM IGNORED AND THEY ARE "PLEASED TO TELL ME THAT MY VEHICLE IS NOT SUBJECT TO RECALL". THIS IS GARBAGE AND CLEARLY THE REASON THAT I WILL NEVER SUPPORT GM OR ANY OF THEIR PRODUCT. I AM DISGUSTED WITH THIS WHOLE PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER- I APPRECIATE WHAT YOU HAVE DONE ON BEHALF OF THOSE MULTITHOUSAND OF OWNERS WHO HAVE NEVER HAD A PROBLEM- BUT IT WAS OF NO BENEFIT TO ME. *AK
AT LOW SPEED, APPROXIMATELY 30MPH, I HAD TO STOP SUDDENLY. AT THE FIRST INSTANCE OF BRAKING THE BRAKES BEGAN TO STOP ME. THEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT SLOWLY TO THE FLOOR AND BRAKING CEASED. I REAR ENDED THE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF ME AT APPROXIMATELY 10 MPH. THE ABS FAILED IN SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES IN MARCH OF 1995, ALSO CAUSING A …
Read full complaint
AT LOW SPEED, APPROXIMATELY 30MPH, I HAD TO STOP SUDDENLY. AT THE FIRST INSTANCE OF BRAKING THE BRAKES BEGAN TO STOP ME. THEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT SLOWLY TO THE FLOOR AND BRAKING CEASED. I REAR ENDED THE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF ME AT APPROXIMATELY 10 MPH. THE ABS FAILED IN SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES IN MARCH OF 1995, ALSO CAUSING A REAR-END COLLISION. THIS INCIDENT WAS ALSO REPORTED TO THE NTSA AS WELL AS TO CHEVROLET. AT THAT TIME THE BRAKES WERE INSPECTED BY A CHEVROLET DEALERS SERVICE DEPARTMENT. CHEVROLET MADE THE DETERMINATION THAT THERE WAS NOTHING DEFECTIVE ABOUT THE BRAKES. THIS PROBLEM DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CONSTANT AND IS APPARENTLY NOT REPEATABLE ON DEMAND. *AK
Official recalls
299V193000 · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip
Jul 19, 1999
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: CERTAIN 4-WHEEL DRIVE PICKUP TRUCKS AND SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH ABS (ANTILOCK BRAKING SYSTEM) MANUFACTURED FROM SEPTEMBER 1989 THROUGH AUGUST 1996. UNDER CERTAIN DRIVING CONDITIONS THE SWITCH WHICH SIGNALS THE ABS SYSTEM WHETHER THE VEHICLE IS IN 2-WHEEL OR 4-WHEEL DRIVE CAN MALFUNCTION CAUSING INCREASED STOPPING DISTANCES DURING ABS STOPS WHILE IN THE TWO-WHEEL DRIVE MODE.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF THIS OCCURRED AT A TIME WHEN MINIMUM STOPPING DISTANCE WAS REQUIRED, A VEHICLE CRASH COULD OCCUR WITHOUT PRIOR WARNING.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE OR REPAIR THE 4-WHEEL/2-WHEEL DRIVE SWITCH.
94V114000 · Trailer Hitches
Jun 20, 1994
THE TRAILER HITCH ATTACHING BOLTS WERE NOT TIGHTENED TO THE SPECIFIED TORQUE. THIS CAN LEAD TO LOOSENING AND SUBSEQUENT BREAKAGE OF THE FASTENERS.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF THIS WERE TO OCCUR WHILE THE TRAILER WAS BEING PULLED, THE HITCH AND TRAILER CAN SEPARATE FROM THE VEHICLE.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL TORQUE ALL EIGHT TRAILER HITCH BOLTS TO THE CORRECT TORQUE.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
6EA01019 · Front Seat Recliner Bolt
Opened Dec 28, 2001 · Closed Sep 27, 2002
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Seats:front Assembly:recliner
There is no summary currently available
RQ99015 · Front Seat Recliner Bolt Failure
Opened Jul 14, 1999 · Closed Dec 28, 2001
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Seats:front Assembly:recliner
No summary supplied.
PE96045 · Alleged Failure Of Rear Leaf Springs
Opened Jul 12, 1996 · Closed Dec 16, 1996
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Suspension
BREAKAGE OF A LEAF SPRING MAY ALLOW PARTIAL COLLAPSE OF THE REAR SUSPENSION AND INCREASE THE POTENTIAL FOR LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL.
PE95010 · Brake Pedal Separation From Pivot Arm
Opened Feb 15, 1995 · Closed May 26, 1995
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic
There is no summary currently available
EA94038 · Abs Braking System
Opened Oct 31, 1994 · Closed Feb 28, 2000
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic
THIS INVESTIGATION RESULTED IN A SAFETY RECALL, 99V-193, AND A SERVICE CAMPAIGN, 99I-006.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
THIS INVESTIGATION RESULTED IN A SAFETY RECALL, 99V-193, AND A SERVICE CAMPAIGN, 99I-006.
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
THIS INVESTIGATION RESULTED IN A SAFETY RECALL, 99V-193, AND A SERVICE CAMPAIGN, 99I-006.
PE94046 · Abs Braking System Fails
Opened Jun 17, 1994 · Closed Oct 31, 1994
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic
There is no summary currently available
Illustration