WAS BACKING OUT OF GARAGE WHEN I HEARD A LOUD SNAPPING NOISE AND THE DRIVER SIDE OF VAN WENT DOWN LIKE A TIRE HAD BLOWN. GOT OUT AND DISCOVERED THAT TIRES WERE OK, BUT FRONT END WAS SAGGING DOWN WITH HARDLY ANY ROOM IN WHEEL WELLS FOR TIRES TO TURN. CALLED TOW TRUCK AND HAD THEM TOW TO DEALERSHIP FOR INVESTIGATION OF PROBLEM. …
Read full complaint
WAS BACKING OUT OF GARAGE WHEN I HEARD A LOUD SNAPPING NOISE AND THE DRIVER SIDE OF VAN WENT DOWN LIKE A TIRE HAD BLOWN. GOT OUT AND DISCOVERED THAT TIRES WERE OK, BUT FRONT END WAS SAGGING DOWN WITH HARDLY ANY ROOM IN WHEEL WELLS FOR TIRES TO TURN. CALLED TOW TRUCK AND HAD THEM TOW TO DEALERSHIP FOR INVESTIGATION OF PROBLEM. THEY TOLD ME THAT BOTH TORSION BARS HAD BROKEN AND THAT THEY WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED AT A COST OF ~$700. I CONSIDER MYSELF REAL LUCKY BECAUSE I HAD JUST RETURNED FROM A TRIP OF OVER 900 MILES, PULLING A BOAT. IF THE BARS WOULD HAVE BROKEN WHILE TRAVELING ON INTERSTATE AT 65 - 70 MPH THERE IS NO TELLING WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED AS FAR AS A ACCIDENT IS CONCERNED. I BELIEVE THAT THIS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED A SAFETY HAZARD AND THE COST SHOULD BE PAID BY THE MANUFACTURE. THANKS. *NLM
NHTSA ODI #10023929
146,000 miles · Jun 18, 2003
Suspension
RIGHT TORSION BAR FAILED. HAD TO REPLACE BOTH BARS SINCE GM REDESIGNED THEM. COST $725. POWER STEERING SEEMS TO BE AFFECTED, BUT MECHANIC COULD NOT PIN POINT PROBLEM. *NLM
NHTSA ODI #10023290
Mileage unknown · Jun 3, 2003
Suspension
FRONT LEFT SIDE TORSION BAR BROKE WHILE SITTING IN THE GARAGE. DROVE THE VEHICLE THE DAY BEFORE. WIFE GOT INTO VEHICLE ON 6-2-03 AND FRONT END HAD SAGGED ON THE LEFT SIDE. VEHICLE TAKEN TO REPAIR FACILITY AND REPORTED THAT TORSION BAR HAD BROKEN. WHEN A GM DEALER WAS CONTACTED FOR PARTS, IT WAS STRESSED THAT BOTH SIDES BE REPAIR…
Read full complaint
FRONT LEFT SIDE TORSION BAR BROKE WHILE SITTING IN THE GARAGE. DROVE THE VEHICLE THE DAY BEFORE. WIFE GOT INTO VEHICLE ON 6-2-03 AND FRONT END HAD SAGGED ON THE LEFT SIDE. VEHICLE TAKEN TO REPAIR FACILITY AND REPORTED THAT TORSION BAR HAD BROKEN. WHEN A GM DEALER WAS CONTACTED FOR PARTS, IT WAS STRESSED THAT BOTH SIDES BE REPAIRED DUE TO HISTORY OF THIS ISSUE. *NLM
NHTSA ODI #10020976
Mileage unknown · May 30, 2003
Suspension
MY FAMILY AND I HAD JUST DRIVEN ABOUT 50 MILES AND WERE GOING TO EAT DINNER, WHILE TURNING RIGHT OFF A STREET WE HEARD A LOUD POP AND THE LEFT FRONT CORNER OF THE VAN FELL. I ASSUMED WE HAD BLOWN A TIRE, BUT WHEN I GOT OUT TO LOOK, THE TIRE WAS STILL UP. AFTER JACKING UP THE VAN AND LOOKING AT THE BALL JOINTS, TIE RODS, ETC., I …
Read full complaint
MY FAMILY AND I HAD JUST DRIVEN ABOUT 50 MILES AND WERE GOING TO EAT DINNER, WHILE TURNING RIGHT OFF A STREET WE HEARD A LOUD POP AND THE LEFT FRONT CORNER OF THE VAN FELL. I ASSUMED WE HAD BLOWN A TIRE, BUT WHEN I GOT OUT TO LOOK, THE TIRE WAS STILL UP. AFTER JACKING UP THE VAN AND LOOKING AT THE BALL JOINTS, TIE RODS, ETC., I REALIZED THAT TORSION BAR HAD SNAPPED. FORTUNATELY THIS OCCURRED AT A LOW SPEED AND DID NOT CAUSE ME TO LOSE CONTROL OF THE VAN - 2 MINUTES EARLIER AND IT WOULD PROBABLY BE A DIFFERENT STORY. THE FIRST DEALER I CONTACTED TOLD ME THE PART WAS DISCONTINUED AND I SHOULD TRY A JUNKYARD TO GET THE PART I NEEDED. THE SECOND DEALER I CONTACTED TOLD ME THERE WAS A CONVERSION KIT I COULD BUY, BUT I HAD TO CONVERT BOTH SIDES, AND THE COST WAS "AT LEAST" $500. IF I HAD KNOWN I NEEDED ANOTHER $500 AND WAS RISKING THE SAFETY OF MY FAMILY, I WOULD NOT HAVE PURCHASED THIS VEHICLE. HOW ABOUT SOME HELP GM?*AK
NHTSA ODI #10020762
120,000 miles · Apr 18, 2003
Suspension
I HAVE A 1995 CHEVROLET ASTRO VAN. ON THE WAY HOME, I HEARD A LOUD BANG, LIKE A TIRE HAD BLOWN. WHEN I PARKED THE CAR AT HOME, I NOTICED THE FRONT DRIVER'S SIDE WAS VISIBLY SAGGING. I TOOK IT TO MY MECHANIC AND HE SAID THE TORSION BAR HAD BROKE. HE ALSO SAID THIS WAS A COMMON PROBLEM IN THIS YEAR OF VEHICLE. I CALLED GENERA…
Read full complaint
I HAVE A 1995 CHEVROLET ASTRO VAN. ON THE WAY HOME, I HEARD A LOUD BANG, LIKE A TIRE HAD BLOWN. WHEN I PARKED THE CAR AT HOME, I NOTICED THE FRONT DRIVER'S SIDE WAS VISIBLY SAGGING. I TOOK IT TO MY MECHANIC AND HE SAID THE TORSION BAR HAD BROKE. HE ALSO SAID THIS WAS A COMMON PROBLEM IN THIS YEAR OF VEHICLE. I CALLED GENERAL MOTORS TO SEE IF THERE WAS A RECALL CAMPAIGN AND THERE IS NOT. I HAVE TO BUY TWO NEW TORSION BARS BECAUSE THERE IS AN UPDATE TO THE VERSION. THE REPAIRS ARE $700.00. *NLM
NHTSA ODI #10016163
Mileage unknown · Dec 6, 2002
Suspension
WHY HASN'T THIS COMPONENT BEEN RECALLED WHEN WE HAVE HEARD THAT MANY HAVE BROKE AND WHEN REPLACING YOU HAVE TO REPLACE BOTH SIDES BECAUSE THERE IS A NEW DESIGN. DT
NHTSA ODI #770527
Mileage unknown · Sep 23, 2002
Suspension
CONSUMER STATES THAT THE FRONT TORSION BAR BROKE ON THE LEFT FRONT SIDE AND FELL ON THE TIRE. VEHICLE TAKEN TO A REPAIRS SHOP. DEALER NOTIFIED. FEEL FREE TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION.*JB
NHTSA ODI #8019223
Mileage unknown · Aug 22, 2002
Suspension
VAN WAS SITTING ON DRIVEWAY WE HEARD A POP AND FRONT DRIVER'S SIDE DROPPED ONTO THE TIRE. HAD IT TOWED TO DEALER, DRIVER SAID THIS WAS THE 2ND ONE THAT WEEK. DEALER SAID IT WAS THE TORSION BAR AND THEY NEEDED TO CHANGE BOTH. ADAPTERS WERE ON 1 WEEK BACK ORDER. WAS TOLD THAT THE DESIGN HAD CHANGED. TALKED TO SEVERAL OTHER ASTR…
Read full complaint
VAN WAS SITTING ON DRIVEWAY WE HEARD A POP AND FRONT DRIVER'S SIDE DROPPED ONTO THE TIRE. HAD IT TOWED TO DEALER, DRIVER SAID THIS WAS THE 2ND ONE THAT WEEK. DEALER SAID IT WAS THE TORSION BAR AND THEY NEEDED TO CHANGE BOTH. ADAPTERS WERE ON 1 WEEK BACK ORDER. WAS TOLD THAT THE DESIGN HAD CHANGED. TALKED TO SEVERAL OTHER ASTRO OWNERS - THIS SEEMS TO BE A COMMON PROBLEM.*AK
NHTSA ODI #766034
Mileage unknown · Jul 31, 2002
Suspension
WHILE DRIVING TORSION BAR BROKE, AND BOTH FRONT CONTROL ARMS BROKE, RESULTING IN FRONT END FALLING DOWN. CONTACTED DEALER.*AK
NHTSA ODI #8015195
Mileage unknown · Jul 2, 2002
Suspension
VEHICLE WAS PARKED .CONSUMER REALIZED VEHICLE WAS DROPPING. HAD VEHICLE TOWED TO DEALER, AND MECHANIC STATED TORSON BAR WAS CORRODED, RESULTING IN VEHICLE DROPPING. *AK
ON CERTAIN MINIVANS, PICKUP TRUCKS, AND SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES WITH CERTAIN MODEL-ENGINE COMBINATIONS, THE WINDSHIELD WIPER MOTOR MAY FAIL DUE TO CRACKED SOLDER JOINTS ON THE CONTROLLER CIRCUIT BOARD. THE WINDSHIELD WIPERS COULD WORK INTERMITTENTLY OR NOT AT ALL.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF THIS WERE TO OCCUR DURING BAD WEATHER, DRIVER VISIBILITY WOULD BE REDUCED, WHICH COULD RESULT IN A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE WIPER MOTOR CIRCUIT BOARD AND COVER. OWNER NOTIFICATION BEGAN ON JUNE 19, 2003. OWNERS WHO TAKE THEIR VEHICLES TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER ON AN AGREED UPON SERVICE DATE AND DO NOT RECEIVE THE FREE REMEDY WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME SHOULD CONTACT CHEVROLET AT 1-800-222-1020, GMC AT 1-800-462-8782, OR OLDSMOBILE AT 1-800-442-6537.
THESE VEHICLES WERE ASSEMBLED WITH THE LEFT-HAND LOWER CONTROL ARM-TO-FRAME REAR NUT NOT TIGHTENED TO THE SPECIFIED TORQUE.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: LOW TORQUE CAN ALLOW THE ATTACHMENT BOLT TO LOOSEN AND SUBSEQUENTLY FATIGUE AND BREAK. THIS CAN RESULT IN SEPARATION OF THE LEFT-HAND CONTROL ARM FROM THE FRAME INCREASING THE POTENTIAL FOR A VEHICLE ACCIDENT.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL TIGHTEN THE LEFT-HAND LOWER CONTROL ARM-TO- FRAME REAR NUT TO THE PROPER TORQUE SPECIFICATION.
THE FUEL LINES ATTACHED TO THE FUEL TANK WERE NOT PROPERLY TIGHTENED.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THESE FUEL LINES CAN LOOSEN TO THE POINT OF ALLOWING FUEL TO LEAK FROM THE LINES RESULTING IN A VEHICLE FIRE.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL LOWER THE FUEL TANK AND TIGHTEN THE FUEL TANK LINES TO THE PROPER TORQUE VALUE.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
3
EA02006 · Windshield Wiper Failure
Opened May 31, 2002 · Closed Jul 23, 2003
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Visibility:windshield Wiper/washer:motor
AS A RESULT OF THIS, AND THE PRECEDINGINVESTIGATION, RQ99-003, GM HAS EXPANDED THE POPULATION OF SAFETY RECALL 98V-150 (REPLACEMENT OF THE WINDSHIELD WIPER CONTROL MODULE) TO INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL 1.77 MILLION VEHICLES.INCLUDED ARE VARIOUS 1994-1997 MY M/L VANS, S/T TRUCKS AND SUVS, & C/K TRUCKS AND SUVS.SEE ATTACHED TECHNICAL REPORT FOR DETAILS.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Visibility:windshield Wiper/washer:motor
AS A RESULT OF THIS, AND THE PRECEDINGINVESTIGATION, RQ99-003, GM HAS EXPANDED THE POPULATION OF SAFETY RECALL 98V-150 (REPLACEMENT OF THE WINDSHIELD WIPER CONTROL MODULE) TO INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL 1.77 MILLION VEHICLES.INCLUDED ARE VARIOUS 1994-1997 MY M/L VANS, S/T TRUCKS AND SUVS, & C/K TRUCKS AND SUVS.SEE ATTACHED TECHNICAL REPORT FOR DETAILS.
Visibility:windshield Wiper/washer:motor
AS A RESULT OF THIS, AND THE PRECEDINGINVESTIGATION, RQ99-003, GM HAS EXPANDED THE POPULATION OF SAFETY RECALL 98V-150 (REPLACEMENT OF THE WINDSHIELD WIPER CONTROL MODULE) TO INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL 1.77 MILLION VEHICLES.INCLUDED ARE VARIOUS 1994-1997 MY M/L VANS, S/T TRUCKS AND SUVS, & C/K TRUCKS AND SUVS.SEE ATTACHED TECHNICAL REPORT FOR DETAILS.
EA00008 · Loss Of Power Assist
Opened Mar 16, 2000 · Closed Aug 31, 2001
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic
There is no summary currently available
RQ99003 · Windshield Wiper
Opened Mar 8, 1999 · Closed May 31, 2002
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Visibility:windshield Wiper/washer
No summary supplied.
1995 Chevrolet Astro Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year